Search

Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVIs) have arisen in recent years as an alternative treatment of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in high risk patients. TTVIs can be classified as annuloplasty devices, caval valve implantation (CAVI), tricuspid valve replacement and coaptation devices. The FORMA repair system (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) aims to improve the coaptation of tricuspid leaflets by occupying the regurgitant orifice with a balloon spacer, which reduces the regurgitant orifice area. After the first-in-human reported case back in 2015, data from 18 patients treated under compassionate clinical use conditions and from 29 patients under the US early feasibility (EFS) trial have been published. The two studies included very high-risk surgical patients (Euroscore II8 in both cohorts). Implantation success was achieved in 16 (89%) and 27 (93%) of patients, respectively. In the US EFS trial, results at 30 days showed improvements in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (NYHA class ≥ III in 28% vs 84% at baseline, p =0.0002), 6-minute walking test (increase by 21 m, p =0.012) and in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (increase by 29 points, p 0001). In addition, the Core Lab evaluation at 30 days showed statistically significant reductions in TR severity grading in the 25 available patients. Regarding the compassionate cohort, 15 patients had available data at long-term follow-up (≥ 2 years). NYHA functional class ≥ III was reduced from 93% to 34% (p 0.001). However, two-thirds of the patients remained with significant TR at last available follow-up, and there were no significant changes in EROA (0.92 vs. 0.77 cm

This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic performance of transcatheter and surgical aortic valves in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus (SAA) and to determine the valve hemodynamics according to transcatheter valve type. Consecutive surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients with SAA were case-matched (1:1) on the basis of sex, body surface area, aortic annulus diameter, and left ventricular ejection fraction. A total of 357 patients in each group constituted the final study population. A second match on the basis of aortic annulus diameter and valve/annulus calcium burden was performed within the TAVR group to compare the valve performance between balloon- (n = 52) and self-expanding (n = 52) transcatheter valve systems (BEV, SEV). The echocardiograms performed at hospital discharge were used for evaluating valve hemodynamics. The mean annulus diameter of the study population was 19.2 ± 0.3 mm. The TAVR group (vs SAVR) exhibited lower mean gradient (12 ± 7 mm Hg vs 15 ± 6 mm Hg, p0.001), larger effective orifice area (1.46 ± 0.39 cm

Aims The clinical impact of new-onset persistent left bundle branch block (NOP-LBBB) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) recipients remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the impact of (i) periprocedural NOP-LBBB and PPI post-TAVR on 1-year all-cause death, cardiac death, and heart failure hospitalization and (ii) NOP-LBBB on the need for PPI at 1-year follow-up. Methods and results We performed a systematic search from PubMed and EMBASE databases for studies reporting raw data on 1-year clinical impact of NOP-LBBB or periprocedural PPI post-TAVR. Data from 30 studies, including 7792 patients (12 studies) and 42 927 patients (21 studies) for the evaluation of the impact of NOP-LBBB and PPI after TAVR were sourced, respectively. NOP-LBBB was associated with an increased risk of all-cause death [risk ratio (RR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17–1.49; P Conclusion NOP-LBBB and PPI after TAVR are associated with an increased risk of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization at 1-year follow-up. Periprocedural NOP-LBBB also increased the risk of cardiac death and PPI within the year following the procedure. Further studies are urgently warranted to enhance preventive measures and optimize the management of conduction disturbances post-TAVR.

This study sought to determine the incidence, clinical characteristics, associated factors, and outcomes of late cerebrovascular events (LCVEs) (30 days post-procedure) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).Scarce data exist on LCVEs following TAVR.This was a multicenter study including 3,750 consecutive patients (mean age, 80 ± 8 years; 50.5% of women) who underwent TAVR and survived beyond 30 days. LCVEs were defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 (VARC 2) criteria.LCVEs occurred in 192 (5.1%) patients (stroke, 80.2%; transient ischemic attack, 19.8%) after a median follow-up of 2 (1 to 4) years. Late stroke was of ischemic, hemorrhagic, and undetermined origin in 80.5%, 18.8%, and 0.7% of patients, respectively. Older age, previous cerebrovascular disease, higher mean aortic gradient at baseline, the occurrence of stroke during the periprocedural TAVR period, and the lack of anticoagulation (novel oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists) post-TAVR were independent factors associated with late ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (p 0.05 for all). Echocardiographic data at the time of the LCVE showed no signs of valve thrombosis or degeneration in the vast majority (97%) patients. Late stroke was disabling in 107 (69.5%) patients (ischemic, 68%; hemorrhagic, 79%), and associated with an in-hospital mortality rate of 29.2%.LCVEs occurred in 5.1% of TAVR recipients after a median follow-up of 2 years. LCVEs were ischemic in most cases, with older age, previous cerebrovascular events, higher mean aortic gradient at baseline, the occurrence during the periprocedural TAVR period, and lack of anticoagulation (but not valve thrombosis/degeneration) determining an increased risk. Late stroke was disabling in most cases and associated with dreadful early and midterm outcomes.

Transcatheter aortic replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the treatment of aortic stenosis during the last years. Despite improvements in transcatheter heart valve systems, the rate of conduction disturbances after TAVR, particularly new-onset left bundle branch block (new-onset LBBB), has not decreased over time.Overview of the current data regarding new-onset LBBB post-TAVR focusing on clinical outcomes.New-onset LBBB remains the most common complication after TAVR, occurring in 6-77% of cases with the use of newer generation transcatheter valve systems. The most consistent factor determining new-onset LBBB post-TAVR has been prosthesis implantation depth. The potential evolution to high degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) and the chronic effect on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may impact the clinical outcomes in this subset of patients. New-onset LBBB has been associated with an increased risk of PPM after TAVR. Conversely, inconsistent results have been reported regarding the impact of LBBB on hospitalization for heart failure and mortality. Current data do not support an indication for 'prophylactic' PPM in all new-onset LBBB patients. However, a specific subset of patients (those with either a very long PR or wide QRS) may benefit from a PPM to prevent HAVB or sudden death.

About one-half of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) candidates have coronary artery disease (CAD), and controversial results have been reported regarding the effect of the presence and severity of CAD on clinical outcomes post-TAVR. In addition to coronary angiography, promising data has been recently reported on both the use of computed tomography angiography and the functional invasive assessment of coronary lesions in the work-up pre-TAVR. While waiting for the results of ongoing randomized trials, percutaneous revascularization of significant coronary lesions has been the routine strategy in TAVR candidates with CAD. Also, scarce data exists on the incidence, characteristics, and management of coronary events post-TAVR, and increasing interest exist on potential coronary access challenges in patients requiring coronary angiography/intervention post-TAVR. This review provides an updated overview of the current landscape of CAD in TAVR recipients, focusing on its prevalence, clinical impact, pre- and post-procedural evaluation and management, unresolved issues and future perspectives.

Despite major improvements in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) periprocedural complications in recent years, the occurrence of conduction disturbances has not decreased over time and remains the most frequent complication of the procedure. Additionally, there has been an important lack of consensus on the management of these complications, which has indeed translated into a high degree of uncertainty regarding the most appropriate treatment of a large proportion of such patients along with major differences between centers and studies in pacemaker rates post-TAVR. There is therefore an urgent need for a uniform strategy regarding the management of conduction disturbances after TAVR. The present expert consensus scientific panel document has been formulated by a multidisciplinary group of interventional cardiologists, electrophysiologists, and cardiac surgeons as an initial attempt to provide a guide for the management of conduction disturbances after TAVR based on the best available data and group expertise.

Sixty-four year-old male patient with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction due to occlusion of his anterior descending artery who received one 3 × 18 mm direct bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) (figure 1A-C). Then he received acetylsalicylic acid and atorvastatin. Fifty-two months later he experienced an anterior reinfarction due to the occlusion of the same segment of the anterior descending artery. Thrombo-aspiration with flow recovery (figure 1D-E) was conducted and the optical coherence tomography showed strut remnants almost indistinguishable in the BVS segment. Thrombosis was attributed to a tear in the neoatherosclerotic lipid plaque (figura 1H-I, video of the supplementary data). Figures figura 1G-L show the BVS markers (pound sign) and the presence of the aforementioned torn lipid plaque (asterisk and arrow, respectively). One drug-eluting metallic stent was implanted inside the stent (figura 1F). Figure 1. The primary goal of BVSs is to eliminate the risk of very late thrombosis once the device is gone. In several series of very late thromboses in drug-eluting metallic stents, one of the main causes seen in the optical coherence tomography is the tear of the neoatherosclerotic lipid-laden plaque (26% to 31%). Therefore, we should expect a significant drop in...

BACKGROUND Tricuspid regurgitation is associated with increased rates of heart failure (HF) and mortality. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) are promising, but the clinical benefit is unknown. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential benefit of TTVI over medical therapy in a propensity score matched population. METHODS The TriValve (Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapies) registry collected 472 patients from 22 European and North American centers who underwent TTVI from 2016 to 2018. A control cohort formed by 2 large retrospective registries enrolling medically managed patients with >= moderate tricuspid regurgitation in Europe and North America (n = 1,179) were propensity score 1:1 matched (distance +/- 0.2 SD) using age, EuroSCORE II, and systolic pulmonary artery pressure. Survival was tested with Cox regression analysis. Primary endpoint was 1-year mortality or HF rehospitalization or the composite. RESULTS After matching, 268 adequately matched pairs of patients were identified. Compared with control subjects, TTVI patients had lower 1-year mortality (23 +/- 3% vs. 36 +/- 3%; p = 0.001), rehospitalization (26 +/- 3% vs. 47 +/- 3%; p < 0.0001), and composite endpoint (32 +/- 4% vs. 49 +/- 3%; p = 0.0003). TTVI was associated with greater survival and freedom from HF rehospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46 to 0.79; p = 0.003 unadjusted), which remained significant after adjusting for sex, New York Heart Association functional class, right ventricular dysfunction, and atrial fibrillation (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.59; p < 0.0001) and after further adjustment for mitral regurgitation and pacemaker/defibrillator (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.54; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In this propensity-matched case-control study, TTVI is associated with greater survival and reduced HF rehospitalization compared with medical therapy alone. Randomized trials should be performed to confirm these results. (C) 2019 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a relatively new technology that has grown exponentially over the past decade. Although it was initially restricted to elderly patients at very high or prohibitive surgical risk, it is currently being evaluated as a treatment option in younger and lower risk patients. The increasing experience of the Heart Teams, along with the continued refinement of transcatheter valve technology has resulted in TAVR achieving results comparable to those of surgery for treating intermediate-risk patients. Furthermore, promising preliminary results have been obtained from observational and propensity matched studies in low risk patients, and a small randomized trial showed the non-inferiority of TAVR vs. SAVR regarding early and late (up to 6 years) outcomes. Three ongoing randomized trials will provide the definite response about the safety and efficacy of TAVR for treating low risk patients with severe aortic stenosis in the near future. The (expected) positive results of these studies would establish the basis for TAVR as the preferred treatment for the majority of patients with aortic stenosis. However, continuous research efforts for better determining valve durability among TAVR recipients, as well as reducing some of the genuine and frequent complications of TAVR (e.g. conduction disturbances) are important in this final effort for making TAVR the default treatment for aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND Coronary perforations (CP) have been described as a rare but potentially fatal complication in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Our aim is to compare temporal trends in frequency, management and outcomes of coronary perforations (CP). METHODS All cases of CP recorded in our prospective institutional percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) registry from 2003 to 2015 were included. Patients were divided in 2 groups according to the time frame in which the CP occurred: the early period (before 2009, when the chronic total occlusions and primary PCI programs started) and the current period. The primary endpoint was the composite of in-hospital serious adverse events, including final TIMI flow 0-1, cardiac tamponade, emergent cardiac surgery or death. RESULTS Overall, 88 CP occurred in 17,566 procedures (0.50%). Of these, 17 (0.26%) occurred during the early period and 71 (0.64%) during the current period (P

We read with interest the study of Mitomo et al1 reporting the feasibility and safety of chronic total occlusions (CTO) revascularization with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. The authors should be congratulated on the outstanding clinical results at follow-up (453 days); target lesion failure and scaffold thrombosis (ST) rates were zero, despite the high-risk characteristics of the population for late complications, such as ST and in-stent restenosis. There have been concerns regarding the somewhat unpredictable behavior of bioresorbable vascular scaffold, especially with regards to the apparent overall increase in late events. Indeed, the perceived increase in late events might discourage their use in scenarios, such as CTO. However, we …