Search

Background Most information on the comparative effectiveness and survival of methotrexate (MTX) and adalimumab (ADA) in the treatment of psoriasis is from randomized control trials and may not translate to the everyday clinical setting. Objectives To determine the real-world effectiveness and survival of MTX and ADA in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis registered in the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR). Methods Eligible patients were registered in BADBIR, ≥ 16 years of age and receiving a first course of MTX or ADA between September 2007 and December 2021, with ≥ 6 months of follow-up. Effectiveness was defined as achieving an absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≤ 2 reported ≥ 13 weeks after the treatment start date until the stop date. The average treatment effect (ATE) was estimated using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity score, including baseline covariates. ATE results were presented as risk ratios (RR). A flexible parametric model was used to estimate adjusted standardized average survival, defined as treatment discontinuation associated with ineffectiveness or the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) at 6, 12 and 24 months. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) at 2 years of treatment exposure was calculated. Results In total, 6575 patients (median age 44 years; 44% female) were analysed; 2659 (40.4%) were prescribed MTX and 3916 (59.5%) ADA. The proportion of patients achieving PASI ≤ 2 was higher in the ADA cohort (77.4%) than in the MTX cohort (37.4%). ADA was more effective than MTX [RR 2.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.98–2.45]. Overall survival associated with ineffectiveness or AEs was lower in the MTX cohort than in the ADA cohort at 6 months [survival estimate 69.7 (95% CI 67.9–71.5) vs. 90.6 (95% CI 89.8–91.4)], 1 year [survival estimate 52.5 (95% CI 50.4–54.8) vs. 80.6 (95% CI 79.5–81.8)] and 2 years [survival estimate 34.8 (95% CI 32.5–37.2) vs. 68.6 (95% CI 67.2–70.0)]. The difference in RMST (years) overall, or when stratified by ineffectiveness and AEs, was 0.53 (95% CI 0.49–0.58), 0.37 (95% CI 0.33–0.42) and 0.29 (95% CI 0.25–0.33), respectively. Conclusions Patients on ADA were twice as likely to be clear or nearly clear of psoriasis and were less likely to discontinue their medication than patients on MTX. Findings from this real-world cohort provide important information to aid clinicians managing patients with psoriasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a systemic inflammatory disease that can be severe, debilitating and life threatening. Uncontrolled activation of interleukin (IL)-36 proinflammatory activity may underlie the pathogenesis of GPP. Currently, GPP-specific treatment options are limited. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anti-IL-36 receptor antibody imsidolimab in patients with GPP. Methods In an open-label, single-arm, multiple-dose study, patients with GPP were treated with imsidolimab to assess clinical efficacy, tolerability and safety. Patients received an intravenous dose of imsidolimab 750 mg on day 1, followed by three subcutaneous doses of imsidolimab 100 mg administered on days 29, 57 and 85. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a clinical response at weeks 4 and 16 following treatment with imsidolimab, as measured by the Clinical Global Impression scale. Results Eight patients were enrolled and six completed the study. Responses were observed as early as day 3, most rapidly for pustulation relative to other manifestations of GPP, with continued and consistent improvement across multiple efficacy assessments at day 8, day 29 and through day 113. Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild to moderate in severity. No patient discontinued the study owing to a nonserious TEAE. Two patients experienced serious adverse events (SAEs); no deaths were reported. Conclusions Imsidolimab demonstrated a rapid and sustained resolution of symptoms and pustular eruptions in patients with GPP. It was generally well tolerated, with an acceptable safety profile, and is advancing to phase III trials. These data support the targeting of IL-36 signalling with a specific antibody – imsidolimab – as a therapeutic option for this severely debilitating condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Biologic and nonbiologic immunomodulators, used to treat immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), could impair the immune response to COVID-19 vaccines and thus vaccine effectiveness. Objectives Our objective was to investigate the association between biologic and nonbiologic immunomodulators and seroconversion following the first and second dose of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with IMIDs. Methods Serum samples were collected following the first or second dose of the BNT162b2 or AZD1222 vaccines from patients receiving biologic and/or nonbiologic immunomodulators for one or more of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease or systemic lupus erythematosus. Seroconversion was defined as a positive Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (spike protein subunit S1/receptor binding domain) immunoassay (≥ 0.8 U mL– 1 ). Association between immunomodulator exposure and seroconversion was assessed using logistic regression, adjusting for age and sex. Results After excluding those with prior COVID-19, post-first vaccine dose samples from 193 participants and post-second dose samples from 312 participants were included in the analysis. Following the first vaccine dose, 17.6% (n = 34) of participants did not seroconvert. Seroconversion was reduced for those on nonbiologic [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12–0.69] or combined nonbiologic and biologic treatment (adjusted OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.045–0.45) compared with those on biologic monotherapy. Subgroup analysis demonstrated reduced odds of seroconversion in those on methotrexate (adjusted OR 0.097, 95% CI 0.19–0.49) or prednisolone treatment (adjusted OR 0.044, 95% CI 0.002–1.00) relative to tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor monotherapy. No participants receiving rituximab (n < 5) seroconverted after the first vaccine dose. Following the second vaccine dose, 1.6% of all participants did not seroconvert. Non-seroconversion was associated with receiving rituximab (n = 3 of 4) compared with those receiving other therapies (n = 2 of 308, P < 0.001). Post hoc analyses demonstrated that non-seroconversion was associated with age [adjusted OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.037–0.93 for those aged 60 years and over (reference category age 18–39 years)], but not sex, ethnicity or vaccine type. Conclusions Treatment with nonbiologics, particularly methotrexate, is associated with impaired seroconversion following two BNT162b2 or AZD1222 vaccine doses, in patients with IMIDs. These findings are consistent with those of other published studies. While this could indicate reduced protection against COVID-19, the immunological parameters that correlate most closely with vaccine effectiveness need to be defined to reach this conclusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Sufficient data on access to systemic treatment for patients with psoriasis living in Latin America (LA) including Brazil and Chile are lacking. Understanding the availability and limiting factors of access to treatments can help to improve patient care and decrease long-term healthcare costs. Objectives In association with the Global Psoriasis Atlas, this cross-sectional survey study analysed the availability and insurance reimbursement of systemic treatments for adult patients with psoriasis in Brazil and Chile. Methods A multicentre, cross-sectional Global Healthcare Study on Psoriasis was performed in Brazil and Chile in 2020. For each eligible adult patient with psoriasis, doctors and nurses completed a 48-item questionnaire about clinical aspects of psoriasis including the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA) score and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), as well as the availability of systemic treatments and insurance reimbursement status. Between-country differences were compared with Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables, and a χ2-test or Fisher's exact test, where appropriate, for categorical variables. The median and interquartile range (IQR) was calculated for non-normal distributed data. Results A total of 1424 patients with psoriasis from 43 centres [27 centres in Brazil (n = 826) and 16 in Chile (n = 598)], were included with a mean (SD) age of 49.1 (16.3) and 49.2 (15.1) years, respectively. Unstratified analyses revealed that patients with psoriasis in Chile had more severe disease than those in Brazil [PASI 11.6 vs. 8.4 (P < 0.001) and BSA 14.7 vs. 12.0 (P = 0.003), respectively]. For patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, defined as PASI and/or BSA ≥ 10, systemic nonbiologic drugs were available (81.2% in Brazil and 65.3% in Chile, P ≤ 0.001), but only 37.0% of patients in Brazil and 27.3% in Chile received biologics (P = 0.01). Lack of availability and/or lack of insurance reimbursement for biologic drugs for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis was reported for 22.2% (50 of 225) in Brazil and 67.9% (148 of 218) in Chile (P < 0.001). Patients with no access to biologic therapies due to lack of availability/insurance reimbursement had a median PASI of 9.15 (IQR 3.00–14.25) in Brazil and 12.0 (IQR 5.00–19.00) in Chile (P = 0.007), as well as a median BSA of 7.0 (IQR 3.00–15.00) and 12.0 (IQR 5.00–22.50) (P = 0.002), and median DLQI of 11.0 (6.00–15.00) and 21.0 (6.50–25.00) (P = 0.007), respectively. Conclusions Chilean patients had significantly more severe psoriasis compared with Brazilian patients in our study. While nonbiologic treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis were available in both LA countries, there is a high need for improvement in access to more effective psoriasis treatments including biologics. Our results highlight a significant gap between treatment recommendations in international psoriasis guidelines and real-world situations in Brazil and Chile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare auto‐inflammatory skin disease characterised by acute episodes of sterile pustule formation. Diagnosis and treatment of the disease have historically been complicated by a lack of awareness, and no consistent global definition or clinical coding standards. Now acknowledged as a distinct clinical entity with a recognised genetic component, GPP can take a serious and life‐threatening course due to systemic inflammatory complications and its association with various comorbidities. As with other rare diseases, there are significant challenges to understanding the epidemiology of GPP, notably a small patient population, non‐standardised study methodologies and ethnic differences in its presentation. A clearer understanding of GPP is therefore required for clinicians to better manage patients with this rare condition. In this review article, we present an overview of the available data on GPP prevalence estimates in key demographics and report the frequency of genetic mutations associated with the disease. We detail the incidence of known comorbidities and summarise the data on mortality and assigned causes of death. Lastly, we discuss the various factors that impact the collection, interpretation and comparison of these data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although several studies have reported the prevalence and sex distribution of psoriasis in different populations in North America, Europe and Asia, limited data on the prevalence of psoriasis among the indigenous peoples of South America are available. Https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljad165 Dear Editor, Psoriasis is a common immune-mediated inflammatory disease that affects at least 60 million people worldwide.[1] Prevalence rates vary mostly according to age, ethnic group and geographical location, with the highest prevalence rates seen in Northern Europe and North America. This study provides important information on the prevalence of psoriasis in the Amazon Rainforest and adds to our body of knowledge on the worldwide distribution of the disease, as mapped by the GPA. [Extracted from the article]

The influence of comorbidities on the efficacy and safety of biologic therapies in psoriasis has not been rigorously explored. To assess the incremental burden of comorbidities on clinical efficacy and safety of secukinumab vs. etanercept and placebo among patients with plaque psoriasis pooled from 4 phase 3 trials. Efficacy was assessed at week 12 according to achievement of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA; modified 2011) responses. Efficacy comparisons between treatment arms stratified by comorbidity status were made using logistic regression analysis with nonresponder imputation. Relationships between baseline characteristics and clinical responses were evaluated by χ2 tests. Of 2401 patients, 1469 (61.2%) had ≥1 active baseline comorbidity. Regardless of comorbidity status, patients receiving secukinumab were more likely to achieve PASI and IGA responses than those receiving etanercept or placebo at week 12 (p <.05 for all comparisons). Body weight of ≥90 kg was consistently associated with a decreased likelihood of achieving PASI and IGA responses (p <.01 for all comparisons). Safety was comparable across treatment arms stratified by comorbidity. Secukinumab improved clinical outcomes and was well tolerated in patients with concomitant baseline comorbid conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]