Search

Your search keyword '"Gayet B"' showing total 691 results
Start Over Author "Gayet B"
691 results on '"Gayet B"'

51. Laparoscopic extended versus open extended distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma: A pan-European propensity-score matched study

Author

Balduzzi, A., primary, Van Hilst, J., additional, Korrel, M., additional, Lof, S., additional, Al-Sarireh, B., additional, Alseidi, A., additional, Berrevoet, F., additional, Bjo¨rnsson, B., additional, Van den Boezem, P., additional, Boggi, U., additional, Busch, O., additional, Butturini, G., additional, Casadei, R., additional, Van dam, R., additional, Dokmak, S., additional, Edwin, B., additional, Fabre, J.M., additional, Falconi, M., additional, Forgione, A., additional, Gayet, B., additional, Gomez, D., additional, Koerkamp, B Groot, additional, Hackert, T., additional, Keck, T., additional, Khatkov, I., additional, Marudanayagam, R., additional, Menon, K., additional, Pietrabissa, A., additional, Poves, I., additional, Salvia, R., additional, and Sa´nchez-Cabu´s, S., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

52. Pure laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: A critical assessment and realistic expectations. A propensity score based analysis of right and left hemihepatectomies from 9 European tertiary referral centers

Author

Cipriani, F., primary, Alzoubi, M., additional, Fuks, D., additional, Ratti, F., additional, Kawai, T., additional, Berardi, G., additional, Barkhatov, L., additional, Lainas, P., additional, Van der Poel, M., additional, Faoury, M., additional, Besselink, M., additional, D'Hondt, M., additional, Dagher, I., additional, Edwin, B., additional, Troisi, R., additional, Scatton, O., additional, Gayet, B., additional, Aldrighetti, L., additional, and Hilal, M Abu, additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

53. Specific features of colorectal cancer in patients with metabolic syndrome: a matched case-control analysis of 772 patients

Author

Zarzavadjian Le Bian A, Denet C, Tabchouri N, Donatelli G, Wind P, Louvet C, Bennamoun M, Christidis C, Perniceni T, Fuks D, Gayet B., Zarzavadjian Le Bian, A, Denet, C, Tabchouri, N, Donatelli, G, Wind, P, Louvet, C, Bennamoun, M, Christidis, C, Perniceni, T, Fuks, D, and Gayet, B.

Abstract

Purpose: Although association between colorectal cancer (CRC) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) is established, specific features of CRC arising in patients presenting with MetS have not been clearly identified. Method: All patients who underwent colectomy for CRC from January 2005 to December 2014 at Institut Mutualiste Montsouris were identified from a prospectively collected database and characteristics were compared in the entire population and in a 1:2 matched case-control analysis [variables on which matching was performed were CRC localization (right- or left-sided) and AJCC stage (0 to IV)]. Results: Out of the 772 identified patients, 98 (12.7%) presented with MetS. Entire population analysis revealed that CRC associated with MetS was more frequent in men (71.4 vs. 47.8%, p < 0.001), more often right-sided (71.4 vs. 50.4%, p < 0.001) and presented with less synchronous liver metastasis (4.1 vs. 8.7%, p = 0.002). Case-control analysis confirmed the gender association (p < 0.001) and showed HNPCC (p < 0.001) and history family of CRC (p = 0.010) to be significantly more frequent in Non-MetS patients. Conclusions: CRC associated with MetS is more frequent in men, more often right-sided, and presents with fewer synchronous metastasis. Further investigations should be designed in order to confirm these results and to enhance our knowledge of carcinogenesis related to MetS.

Published
2018

54. Recurrence patterns after laparoscopic resection of colorectal liver metastases

Author

Tabchouri N, Gayet B, Okumura S, Donatelli G, Beaussier M, Bennamoun M, Louvet C, Fuks D., Tabchouri, N, Gayet, B, Okumura, S, Donatelli, G, Beaussier, M, Bennamoun, M, Louvet, C, and Fuks, D.

Abstract

Background: The major issue after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is the high incidence of recurrence. Unlike open liver resection (OLR), recurrence following laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is not well documented. The aim of this study was to analyze recurrence patterns and treatment following LLR for CRLM. Study design: All patients who underwent LLR for CRLM from 2000 to 2016 were reviewed. Patients who presented with recurrence were compared to those who did not. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and risk of recurrence and survival prognostic factors were analyzed. Results: Overall, 273 patients were included, of which 157 (57.5%) were treated for one liver metastasis (LM). Median follow-up was 41 (12-187) months and associated extrahepatic disease was present in 27% of patients (mainly pulmonary, 65%). After a median of 16 (3-151) months, 197 (72%) patients presented with recurrence. Recurrences were early (< 6 months) in 22.8% of cases, occured in a single site in 66% and were intrahepatic, extrahepatic, or both in 44, 30, and 26%, respectively. Recurrences were treated with surgery or chemotherapy only in 45 and 47%, respectively. 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS was 82, 71, and 43%, respectively. Independent risk factors for recurrence were node-positive primary tumor, extrahepatic disease before hepatectomy, and R1 resection. Conclusion: LLR for CRLM does not seem to be associated with distinctive recurrence patterns. LLR for CRLM yielded satisfying RFS and OS and should therefore be considered whenever possible.

Published
2018

56. Minimally Invasive versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA)

Author

van Hilst, J, de Rooij, T, Klompmaker, S, Rawashdeh, M, Aleotti, F, Al-Sarireh, B, Alseidi, A, Ateeb, Z, Balzano, G, Berrevoet, F, Bjornsson, B, Boggi, U, Busch, Or, Butturini, G, Casadei, R, Del Chiaro, M, Chikhladze, S, Cipriani, F, van Dam, R, Damoli, I, van Dieren, S, Dokmak, S, Edwin, B, van Eijck, C, Fabre, Jm, Falconi, M, Farges, O, Fernandez-Cruz, L, Forgione, A, Frigerio, I, Fuks, D, Gavazzi, F, Gayet, B, Giardino, A, Koerkamp, Bg, Hackert, T, Hassenpflug, M, Kabir, I, Keck, T, Khatkov, I, Kusar, M, Lombardo, C, Marchegiani, G, Marshall, R, Menon, Kv, Montorsi, M, Orville, M, de Pastena, M, Pietrabissa, A, Poves, I, Primrose, J, Pugliese, R, Ricci, C, Roberts, K, Rosok, B, Sahakyan, Ma, Sanchez-Cabus, S, Sandstrom, P, Scovel, L, Solaini, L, Soonawalla, Z, Souche, Fr, Sutcliffe, Rp, Tiberio, Ga, Tomazic, A, Troisi, R, Wellner, U, White, S, Wittel, Ua, Zerbi, A, Bassi, C, Besselink, Mg, and Abu Hilal, M

Subjects
Male, robot-assisted, laparoscopic, Pancreatectomy, Postoperative Complications, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Humans, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, distal pancreatectomy, Propensity Score, Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies, Incidence, Carcinoma, Length of Stay, left pancreatectomy, minimally invasive, Pancreatic Ductal, Europe, Female, Laparoscopy, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal
Published
2019

67. Multicentre propensity score-matched study of laparoscopic versus open repeat liver resection for colorectal liver metastases

Author

van der Poel, M J, primary, Barkhatov, L, additional, Fuks, D, additional, Berardi, G, additional, Cipriani, F, additional, Aljaiuossi, A, additional, Lainas, P, additional, Dagher, I, additional, D'Hondt, M, additional, Rotellar, F, additional, Besselink, M G, additional, Aldrighetti, L, additional, Troisi, R I, additional, Gayet, B, additional, Edwin, B, additional, and Abu Hilal, M, additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

68. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): a pan-European propensity score matched study

Author

van Hilst, J., primary, de Rooij, T., additional, Klompmaker, S., additional, Rawashdeh, M., additional, Aleotti, F., additional, Al-Sarireh, B., additional, Alseidi, A., additional, Ateeb, Z., additional, Balzano, G., additional, Berrevoet, F., additional, Björnsson, B., additional, Boggi, U., additional, Busch, O., additional, Butturini, G., additional, Casadei, R., additional, del Chiaro, M., additional, Cipriani, F., additional, van Dam, R., additional, Damoli, I., additional, Dokmak, S., additional, Edwin, B., additional, van Eijck, C., additional, Fabre, J., additional, Falconi, M., additional, Farges, O., additional, Fernández-Cruz, L., additional, Forgione, A., additional, Frigerio, I., additional, Fuks, D., additional, Gavazzi, F., additional, Gayet, B., additional, Giardino, A., additional, Groot Koerkamp, B., additional, Hackert, T., additional, Hassenpflug, M., additional, Kabir, I., additional, Keck, T., additional, Khatkov, I., additional, Klock, A., additional, Kusar, M., additional, Lombardo, C., additional, Marchegiani, G., additional, Marshall, R., additional, Menon, K., additional, Montorsi, M., additional, Nowbray, N., additional, Orville, M., additional, Pietrabissa, A., additional, Poves, I., additional, Primrose, J., additional, Pugliese, R., additional, Ricci, C., additional, Roberts, K., additional, Røsok, B., additional, Sahakyan, M., additional, Sánchez-Cabús, S., additional, Sandström, P., additional, Scovel, L., additional, Solaini, L., additional, Soonawalla, Z., additional, Souche, R., additional, Sutcliffe, R., additional, Tiberio, G., additional, Tomazic, A., additional, Troisi, R., additional, Wellner, U., additional, White, S., additional, Wittel, U., additional, Zerbi, A., additional, Bassi, C., additional, Besselink, M., additional, and Abu Hilal, M., additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

75. Impact of cirrhosis in patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection in a nationwide multicentre survey.

Author

Hobeika, C., Fuks, D., Cauchy, F., Goumard, C., Soubrane, O., Gayet, B., Salamé, E., Cherqui, D., Vibert, E., Scatton, O., Nomi, T., Oudafal, N., Kawai, T., Komatsu, S., Okumura, S., Petrucciani, N., Laurent, A., Bucur, P., Barbier, L., and Trechot, B.

Subjects
LAPAROSCOPIC surgery, LIVER surgery, CIRRHOSIS of the liver, PROPENSITY score matching, DEMOGRAPHIC characteristics, LIVER failure
Abstract

Copyright of British Journal of Surgery is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

81. Should we blindly believe in liver volumetry?

Author

Golse, N., primary, Cosse, C., additional, Gayet, B., additional, Tréchot, B., additional, Rode, A., additional, Lewin, M., additional, Le Roy, B., additional, Gallon, A., additional, Adam, R., additional, and Vibert, E., additional

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

83. Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic neoplasms: the European association for endoscopic surgery clinical consensus conference

Author

Edwin, B, Sahakyan, M, Abu Hilal, M, Besselink, M, Braga, M, Fabre, J, Fernández-Cruz, L, Gayet, B, Kim, S, Khatkov, I, Baichorov, M, De Rooij, T, Genç, C, Haugvik, S, Izrailov, R, Khisamov, A, Sánchez-Cabús, S, Souche, R, Van Hilst, J, Edwin, Bjørn, Sahakyan, Mushegh A., Abu Hilal, Mohammad, Besselink, Marc G., Braga, Marco, Fabre, Jean-Michel, Fernández-Cruz, Laureano, Gayet, Brice, Kim, Song Cheol, Khatkov, Igor E., Baichorov, Magomet E., De Rooij, Thijs, Genç, Cansu G., Haugvik, Sven-Petter, Izrailov, Roman E., Khisamov, Arthur A., Sánchez-Cabús, Santiago, Souche, Régis, Van Hilst, Jony, Edwin, B, Sahakyan, M, Abu Hilal, M, Besselink, M, Braga, M, Fabre, J, Fernández-Cruz, L, Gayet, B, Kim, S, Khatkov, I, Baichorov, M, De Rooij, T, Genç, C, Haugvik, S, Izrailov, R, Khisamov, A, Sánchez-Cabús, S, Souche, R, Van Hilst, J, Edwin, Bjørn, Sahakyan, Mushegh A., Abu Hilal, Mohammad, Besselink, Marc G., Braga, Marco, Fabre, Jean-Michel, Fernández-Cruz, Laureano, Gayet, Brice, Kim, Song Cheol, Khatkov, Igor E., Baichorov, Magomet E., De Rooij, Thijs, Genç, Cansu G., Haugvik, Sven-Petter, Izrailov, Roman E., Khisamov, Arthur A., Sánchez-Cabús, Santiago, Souche, Régis, and Van Hilst, Jony

Abstract

Background: Introduced more than 20 years ago, laparoscopic pancreatic surgery (LAPS) has not reached a uniform acceptance among HPB surgeons. As a result, there is no consensus regarding its use in patients with pancreatic neoplasms. This study, organized by the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), aimed to develop consensus statements and clinical recommendations on the application of LAPS in these patients. Methods: An international panel of experts was selected based on their clinical and scientific expertise in laparoscopic and open pancreatic surgery. Each panelist performed a critical appraisal of the literature and prepared evidence-based statements assessed by other panelists during Delphi process. The statements were further discussed during a one-day face-to-face meeting followed by the second round of Delphi. Modified statements were presented at the plenary session of the 24th International Congress of the EAES in Amsterdam and in a web-based survey. Results: LAPS included laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD), enucleation, central pancreatectomy, and ultrasound. In general, LAPS was found to be safe, especially in experienced hands, and also advantageous over an open approach in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery, and quality of life. Eighty-five percent or higher proportion of responders agreed with the majority (69.5%) of statements. However, the evidence is predominantly based on retrospective case–control studies and systematic reviews of these studies, clearly affected by selection bias. Furthermore, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been published to date, although four RCTs are currently underway in Europe. Conclusions: LAPS is currently in its development and exploration stages, as defined by the international IDEAL framework for surgical innovation. LDP is feasible and safe, performed in many centers, while LPD is limited to few centers. RCTs and registry studies

Published
2017

93. Factors influencing recurrence following initial hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases

Author

Hallet, J, primary, Sa Cunha, A, additional, Adam, R, additional, Goéré, D, additional, Bachellier, P, additional, Azoulay, D, additional, Ayav, A, additional, Grégoire, E, additional, Navarro, F, additional, Pessaux, P, additional, Cosse, C, additional, Lignier, D, additional, Régimbeau, J-M, additional, Barbieux, J, additional, Lermite, E, additional, Hamy, A, additional, Mauvais, F, additional, Naasan, I A, additional, Cerda, C, additional, Compagnon, P, additional, Salloum, C, additional, Lim, C, additional, Laurent, A, additional, Rivoire, M, additional, Baulieux, J, additional, Darnis, B, additional, Mabrut, J Y, additional, Ducerf, C, additional, Kepenekian, V, additional, Perinel, J, additional, Adham, M, additional, Passot, G, additional, Glehen, O, additional, Le Treur, Y P, additional, Hardwigsen, J, additional, Palen, A, additional, Delpero, J R, additional, Turrini, O, additional, Herrero, A, additional, Panaro, F, additional, Bresler, L, additional, Rauch, P, additional, Guillemin, F, additional, Marchal, F, additional, Benoist, S, additional, Brouquet, A, additional, Lo Dico, R, additional, Pocard, M, additional, Brouquier, A, additional, Penna, C, additional, Scatton, O, additional, Soubrane, O, additional, Fuks, D, additional, Gayet, B, additional, Piardi, T, additional, Sommacale, D, additional, Kianmanesh, R, additional, Lepere, M, additional, Oussoultzoglou, E, additional, Addeo, P F, additional, Ntourakis, D, additional, Mutter, D, additional, Marescaux, J, additional, Raoux, L, additional, Suc, B, additional, Muscari, F, additional, Castaing, D, additional, Cherqui, D, additional, Gelli, M, additional, Allard, M A, additional, Vibert, E, additional, Pittau, G, additional, Ciacio, O, additional, Elias, D, additional, and Vittadello, F, additional

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results