Search

Purpose: In esophageal surgery, total minimally invasive techniques compete with hybrid and robot-assisted procedures. The benefit of the individual techniques for the patient remains vague. At our institution, the hybrid minimally invasive laparoscopic-thoracotomic esophagectomy (HMIE) has been routinely applied since 2013. We conducted this retrospective study to analyze the perioperative outcome. Methods: Since 2013, 60 patients were operated in HMIE technique for esophageal cancer. Each of these patients was paired according to the criteria of gender, BMI, age, tumor histology, pulmonary preexisting conditions, and a history of smoking with a patient treated by open esophagectomy (OE). Perioperative parameters were extracted from our prospectively maintained database and compared among the groups. Results: The HMIE and OE groups were homogeneous in terms of patient- and tumor-related data. There was no difference in lymph nodes harvested (22 vs. 20, p = 0.459) and R0-resection rate (95 vs. 93%, p = 0.500). The operation time for the HMIE was significantly shorter (329 vs. 407 min, p < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups with respect to surgical complications (37 vs. 37%, p = 0.575), but the patients undergoing hybrid technique showed more delayed gastric emptying (23 vs. 10%, p = 0.042). Pulmonary morbidity was significantly reduced after HMIE (20 vs. 42%, p = 0.009). This affected both the occurrence of pneumonia and pleural effusions. The difference in the overall complication rate was not significant (50 vs. 60%, p = 0.179), but life-threatening complications (Clavien/Dindo 4/5) were less frequent (2 vs. 12%, p = 0.031). Overall, there was significantly less need for transfusion after HMIE (18 vs. 50%, p < 0.001), and hospital (and IMC) stay was significantly shorter (14 (6) vs. 18 (7) days, p = 0.002 (0.003)). The multivariate analysis confirms the surgical procedure as an independent risk factor for the development of pulmonary complications (OR 3.2, p = 0.011). Furthermore, preexisting pulmonary conditions were identified as a risk factor (OR 3.6, p = 0.006). Conclusion: Our retrospective analysis shows that reduction of postoperative pulmonary morbidity, perioperative blood loss, and shortening of hospital stay can be achieved by HMIE. The procedure is safe, and the rate of surgical complications and oncological radicality is comparable to the conventional procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Esophageal replacement (ER) with gastric pull-up (GPU) or jejunal interposition (JI) used to be the standard treatment for long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). Changes of the ER grafts on a macro- and microscopic level however, are unknown., Aim: To evaluate long-term clinical symptoms and anatomical and mucosal changes in adolescents and adults after ER for LGEA., Methods: A cohort study was conducted including all LGEA patients ≥ 16 years who had undergone GPU or JI between 1985-2003 at two tertiary referral centers in the Netherlands. Patients underwent clinical assessment, contrast study and endoscopy with biopsy. Data was collected prospectively. Group differences between JI and GPU patients, and associations between different outcome measures were assessed using the Fisher's exact test for bivariate variables and the Mann-Whitney U -test for continuous variables. Differences with a P -value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant., Results: Nine GPU patients and eleven JI patients were included. Median age at follow-up was 21.5 years and 24.4 years, respectively. Reflux was reported in six GPU patients (67%) vs four JI patients (36%) ( P = 0.37). Dysphagia symptoms were reported in 64% of JI patients, compared to 22% of GPU patients ( P = 0.09). Contrast studies showed dilatation of the jejunal graft in six patients (55%) and graft lengthening in four of these six patients. Endoscopy revealed columnar-lined esophagus in three GPU patients (33%) and intestinal metaplasia was histologically confirmed in two patients (22%). No association was found between reflux symptoms and macroscopic anomalies or intestinal metaplasia. Three GPU patients (33%) experienced severe feeding problems vs none in the JI group. The median body mass index of JI patients was 20.9 kg/m 2 vs 19.5 kg/m 2 in GPU patients ( P = 0.08)., Conclusion: The majority of GPU patients had reflux and intestinal metaplasia in 22%. The majority of JI patients had dysphagia and a dilated graft. Follow-up after ER for LGEA is essential., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article., (©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

In the developing countries, the babies with pure esophageal atresia undergo an esophagostomy and feeding gastrostomy at birth. It assists in early discharge from hospital. Esophageal substitution in these babies around six months is recommended. We report the first laparoscopic and thoracoscopic gastric pull up in early infancy from India.

Durante el período comprendido entre 1990 y 2006, 28 pacientes fueron sometidos a resección esofágica por cáncer en el Servicio de Cirugía de Tórax del Hospital Dr. Rafael Á. Calderón Guardia. La edad promedio fue de 65 años y la relación hombre mujer, de 6 a 1. El antecedente de tabaquismo se confirmó en un 80%, etilismo en un 75% y 8 pacientes eran conocidos portadores de esófago de Barret. Disfagia, dolor epigástrico y pérdida de peso fueron los síntomas más frecuentes; siendo la epigastralgia debida a otra patología digestiva coexistente, como reflujo o enfermedad péptica. Los pacientes clasificados como estadio IIb, III y IV recibieron terapia de inducción y aunque en 3 de estos no se encontró tumor residual en la pieza quirúrgica, en 2 casos quedó tumor adherido a la aorta. A 21 pacientes se les realizó esofagectomía total con ascenso gástrico y anastomosis cervical y a 7 esofagectomía parcial con ascenso gástrico al tórax en 5 y 2 esófago-yeyuno anastomosis, una intratorácica y otra abdominal. La complicación más frecuente fue la claudicación respiratoria por bronconeumonía, que se produjo en 7 pacientes y que fue mortal en 3. Dos de estos pacientes presentaron además fuga de anastomosis, una en el cuello y otra en el tórax. A largo plazo la complicación más frecuente fue estrechez de la anastomosis, que en los 7 casos se ha manejado con dilataciones. La mortalidad quirúrgica fue del 10.7% y en los 3 casos la bronconeumonía fue la causa principal. La supervivencia a 5 y 10 años fue del 31.5% y el 18%, respectivamente.Between 1990 and 2006, 28 patients had esophageal cancer resection at the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Hospital Calderón Guardia of the Costa Rican Social Security System. The mean age was 65 years with a high male predominance of 6:1. Eighty percent of the patients were smokers, 75% drinkers and 8 patients had previous diagnosis of Barret’s esophagus. Dysphagia, epigastric pain and weight loss were the most frequent symptoms but the pain was related to preexisting peptic disease or esophagitis secondary to gastric reflux. Stage IIb, III and IV patients received neoadyuvant therapy. Three of these cases did not show residual tumor and 2 had residual aortic disease. Twenty one patients had total esophagectomy and 7 patiens had partial esophagectomies with gastric anastomosis in 5 and 2 esophagojejunostomies. Major complications were respiratory distress and bronchopneumonia in 7 patients, and anastomotic leak in 2. Thirty days mortality was 10.7%. The 3 patients died with bronconeumonía and one with cervical and other thoracic leak. Seven patients developed anastomotic strictures treated with dilatations. Survival at 5 and 10 years was 31.5% and 18% respectively.

A simple, rapid, reliable technique to close an anterior neck defect is presented. This technique involves skin grafting directly onto the de-serosalized stomach wall following gastric pull-up reconstruction for a hypopharyngeal cancer.

Introduction: The objective of the study to compare outcome and complications of Colonic interposition and Gastric pull-up in treatment of corrosive esophageal stricture. Methodology: This cohort study was conducted on the patients admitted in the surgical wards of SMIMER hospital, Surat with clinically diagnosed corrosive esophageal stricture. The cases were then followed for a period of 6 months from the date of commencement of surgical procedure. Results: The study included 25 patients of corrosive oesophageal stricture, 12 were operated by colonic interposition and 13 were operated by gastric pull up method. Most common reason for indication of surgery was failure to dilatation. Mean duration of surgery of patients operated by colonic interposition method was 5.41 hours while it was 3.57 hours for patients operated by gastric pull-up method. Mean post-operative pain score of patients operated by colonic interposition method was 4 while it was 2.77 for patients operated by gastric pull-up method. Conclusion: Gastric pull up was better method compared to colonic interposition in the management of corrosive oesophageal stricture due to the relative technical ease, excellent healing power of the anastomosis, wide anastomotic stoma at the neck and only one single anastomosis is required.

Replacement of the esophagus in children can be performed in cases of malformations, injuries, or acquired conditions. The new esophagus should allow normal oral feeding, with little or no gastroesophageal reflux, and be able to work well for the lifetime of the patient. For over a century, many substitutes have been used, such as segments of colon, the entire stomach, gastric tubes, or parts of the small bowel, but none are perfect or function like a normal esophagus. Esophageal replacements are demanding challenges for pediatric surgeons. Here, I review the different techniques and the pitfalls related to these procedures on the basis of our experience of more than 300 esophageal replacements in children performed since 1989. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The aim of this study was to report the results of pediatric esophageal substitution by gastric pull-up (GPU) and gastric tube (GT) from a tertiary care pediatric center. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of the surgical techniques, results, complications, and final outcome of all pediatric patients who underwent esophageal substitution in a single institution was performed. Results: Twenty-four esophageal substitutions were performed over 15-year period. The indications were pure esophageal atresia (EA)-19, EA with distal trachea-esophageal fistula-2, EA with proximal pouch fistula-1, and esophageal stricture in two patients. Mean age and weight at operation were 17 months and 9.5 kg, respectively. GPU was the most common procedure (19) followed by reverse GT (4) and gastric fundal tube (1). Posterior mediastinal and retrosternal routes were used in 17 and 7 cases, respectively. Major complications included three deaths in GPU cases resulting from postoperative tachyarrhythmias leading to cardiac arrest, cervical anastomotic leak-17, and anastomotic stricture in six cases. Perioperative tachyarrhythmias (10/19) and transient hypertension (2/19) were observed in GPU patients, and they were managed with beta blocker drugs. Postoperative ventilation in Intensive Care Unit was performed for all GPU, but none of the GT patients. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 15 years that showed short-term feeding difficulties and no major growth-related problems. Conclusions: Perioperative tachyarrhythmias are common following GPU which mandates close intensive care monitoring with ventilation and judicious use of beta blocking drugs. Retrosternal GT with a staged neck anastomosis can be performed without postoperative ventilation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy with tracheal resection is an uncommon procedure. The resectability of a hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal tumor typically depends on the ability to obtain clean surgical margins. The extent of the resection requires careful surgical planning and execution. Concomitant tracheal resection and manubriectomy due to tracheal invasion increases the complexity of these already challenging conditions. Although gastric pull-up procedures have been used to successfully reconstruct laryngopharyngoesophageal defects after tumor resection, a free tissue augmented reconstructive approach should be considered in more aggressive tumors with invasion of surrounding structures. Herein, we describe the use of combining gastric pull-up with anterolateral thigh free tissue transfer for optimal repair after radical tumor resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Esophagectomy and subsequent reconstruction represent major physiological insults to the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, which as a consequence can lead to malnutrition, dysphagia and reflux. From a technical perspective, operative reconstruction involving gastric pull-up with a 2-3 cm wide tube and an anastomosis cranial to the azygos vein may minimize the symptoms. Overall, the problems tend to improve approximately 6 months after the operation. Newly occurring delayed physical functional impairments with previously known underlying malignant disease may be indicative of cancer relapse. Interventional techniques, such as stent placement or brachytherapy may be better suited for treatment of recurrent disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reconstruction for patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx (SCCHP) after radical surgery is a challenge for head and neck surgeons, especially when one flap alone cannot entirely cover the defects. In this report, we describe the successful use of gastric pull-up combined with pectoralis major flaps for single-stage reconstruction after total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy in patients with SCCHP. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 23 patients with stage IV SCCHP who underwent this reconstructive procedure. Surgical details and perioperative morbidity were described, and functional and oncologic outcomes were evaluated. We used the gastric pull-up and pectoralis major flap procedure to reconstruct the defects for all 23 patients. In 13 patients the combined flaps were used to restore intestinal continuity, and in 10 patients the defects were repaired using gastric pull-up alone and covered by the pectoralis major flap. All the combined flaps worked well, and patients recovered normal swallowing function a mean 19.6 days after surgery. After an overall mean follow-up time of 25.3 months, six patients were still alive at the time of this analysis with no evidence of disease. Our results indicate that for patients with advanced SCCHP after total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy, using a pectoralis major flap combined with gastric pull-up enables one-stage reconstruction even when gastric pull-up alone cannot restore intestinal continuity. Furthermore, the functional and oncologic outcomes from this study suggest that this reconstructive procedure is safe and reliable, and more patients with advanced disease could be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Of the Study: To determine the appropriate salvage method after total necrosis of a jejunal graft after reconstruction of total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy or a larynx-preserving operation, considering the complexity of medical service in China.Procedures: We reviewed 5 patients with a mean age of 61 years who developed total jejunal graft necrosis and underwent reconstruction of a free jejunal transfer in our hospital. The total number and choice of salvage procedures, the symptoms and the results of salvage for the 5 patients have been reviewed.Results: Four of the 5 patients survived. One of them underwent gastric pull-up reconstruction and recovered well. One patient died due to severe infection after the loss of the jejunal graft and secondary gastric pull-up reconstruction. A temporary external fistula was formed in 3 patients after the initial jejunal graft necrosis, 2 of which underwent fistula repair 6 and 5 months later, while one went on long-term gastric tube feeding.Conclusion: Our results suggest that a temporary external fistula formation is an optional secondary salvage procedure after total necrosis of an initial jejunal graft, considering the relatively low quality of medical service in China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study was to analyze outcomes of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) treated with partial gastric pull-up (PGP) into the thorax. Methods: The medical records of all children who had undergone PGP for LGEA from 1999 to 2012 were reviewed. Preoperative data, initial postoperative course, complications, time to full oral nutrition, follow-up diagnostics and nutritional status were assessed. Results: Nine children who had undergone PGP were followed up for a mean period of 6.2±3.1 years. Their median gestational age was 37±2 weeks, and mean birth weight 2462±658 g. Eight children were primarily treated with a gastrostomy, their mean age at PGP was 11.4±10.9 weeks and mean weight was 4484±1966 g. Their mean operation time was 199±51 minutes. Leakage was an early postoperative complication in three children, one of whom had a consecutive stricture resection. Late complications were stenosis ( n=7) and gastro-esophageal reflux ( n=5). The general status of the children was judged as 'good' or 'very good' on the last presentation. The median percentile of the body-mass-index was 25. Gastroscopy at 3.7±3.2 years after the operation revealed a grade I esophagitis in two children. There was no death in this group of children. Conclusions: Because of its high complication rate, partial gastric pull-up cannot be recommended as an alternative for the treatment of LGEA at present. A final judgment could be made on the basis of a comparative study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Gastric drainage disorder is one of the complications of gastric pullup and esophagectomy after surgery which might lead to esophageal cancer and benign strictures. The aim of this study was to determine the role of pyloromyotomy on gastric drainage. Materials and Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial study, we studied 51 patients in two matched groups from July 2008 to August 2010 in Imam Reza Hospital, Tabriz, Iran. Twenty-seven patients in group one had no pyloromyotomy and 24 patients in group two had pyloromyotomy after transhiatal esophagectomy and gastric pull-up procedure. The outcomes were measured as the incidence of gastric outlet compromise which was diagnosed 12 months after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up. Regurgitation, fullness, respiratory distress, coughing and, clinical delayed gastric emptying were observed and compared in two groups by radioisotope gastric emptying scanning. Results: A total number of 51 patients, 19 (37.25%) male and 32 (62.75%) female were studied in this research. The overall incidence of delayed gastric emptying was 19 /51 (37.25%). Pyloromyotomy did not reduce the incidence of delayed gastric emptying. There was no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay in study groups (group 1= 11 days versus 12 days in group 2, P=0.41). There was no statistical difference in anastomotic leak or anastomotic stricture (P= 0.72). Mortality was two (one patient, 3.7%, in group 1 and one patient, 4.2%, in group 2). The incidences of regurgitation and increased gastric emptying were not statistically different in two groups. Conclusion: Pyloromyotomy could not reduce the incidence of delayed gastric emptying after transhiatal esophagectomy, and vagotomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose When restoration of the anatomical continuity in case of long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is not feasible, esophageal replacement surgery becomes mandatory. The aim of this paper is to critically compare the experience of two tertiary referral centers in The Netherlands performing either gastric pull-up (GPU) or jejunal interposition (JI). Methods Retrospective chart review of all the patients with LGEA who underwent GPU in the University Medical Center Groningen and JI in the University Medical Center Utrecht. Main endpoints were short term morbidity, mortality and long term functional outcome (digestive functioning and growth). Descriptive analyses conducted using Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Results Nine children underwent GPU and 15 JI. Median age (years) at last follow up was fourteen (GPU) and eight (JI). One patient died, 10 years after JI. No grafts were lost. Perioperative anastomotic complications were reported more often after JI (73% vs. 22%, p = 0.03). However reintervention rate was the same in both groups (33%). Among long term outcomes, functional obstruction was not registered after GPU, while it was recorded in 46% after JI (p = 0.02). No other significant differences were found apart from some tendencies concerning full oral nutrition and gastroesophageal reflux (GPU > JI). Conclusion Comparative data from this study reveal no mortality but significant morbidity in both groups. No graft was lost. Although not statistically different as a result of small patient numbers, clinically important differences regarding gastrointestinal system were noted. Growth should be monitored closely in both groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Conditions requiring an esophagectomy and esophageal replacement are rare in children. The preferred method and ideal replacement organ continue to be debated. We present long-term outcomes in children treated with esophagectomy and gastric pull-up.Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all the patients who underwent a esophagectomy and gastric pull-up at two major pediatric institutions from 2004 to 2015. Follow-up data were obtained for children when available, including any postoperative complications, need for dilation of strictures, and current feeding method.Results: Minimally invasive procedures were performed on 7 patients (5 female and 2 male) with a median age of 3 years (range 2-20, standard deviation = 8). Three patients successfully underwent laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy and cervical gastric pull-up, and three patients successfully underwent combined laparoscopic and right thoracoscopic (Ivor-Lewis) esophagectomy and cervical gastric pull-up. We identified an additional 3 patients who had an open esophagectomy and gastric pull-up. Seven patients had tubularized gastric conduits, six without pyloroplasty and one with pyloroplasty. For those patients with tubularized conduits, the average time to achieve full oral feeds was 16 days, with 1 patient with pyloroplasty who took 27 days. Of the three whole-stomach conduits, one reached oral independence at 19 days and the other two had yet tolerated anything per os. Follow-up data were available for all patients. At the average 5 years follow-up (ranging from 1 month to 7 years), all but two were thriving well with full oral feeds.Conclusions: Minimally invasive esophagectomy and gastric pull-up is a good alternative in managing pediatric patients in need of esophagectomy and replacement; it offers acceptable early and long-term outcomes. Tubularized conduit appears to be superior to using the whole stomach and potentially avoids pyloroplasty. Ongoing study is needed to validate our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In the past decades various techniques of esophagectomy for the curative treatment of esophageal cancer have been described. Especially minimally invasive techniques of esophagectomy have been used increasingly in the last decade. Technical issues and results of hybrid laparoscopic-thoracotomic en bloc esophagectomy with intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis (HMIE) are presented and discussed in the article. Patients and methods: Between May 2013 and April 2014 a total of 23 patients underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer at the University of Freiburg Medical Center. Of these patients 10 were treated by HMIE and the other 13 patients had open esophagectomy (OE). Results: A detailed description of the operative technique of HMIE is given in a step-by-step fashion. Margin negative resection was achieved in all patients after HMIE and OE and the median lymph node yield of lymphadenectomy in HMIE and OE (29 vs. 27) was nearly the same. The medium duration of the operation (347 min vs. 412 min) and median length of stay on the intensive care unit (6 days vs. 9 days) and hospital (13 days vs. 17 days) were decreased in HMIE patients compared to OE, respectively. Overall postoperative morbidity (40 % vs. 69 %) and especially pulmonary morbidity (10 % vs. 46 %) were also favorable in HMIE. No anastomotic leakage and postoperative in-hospital mortality occurred after HMIE. Conclusion: The HMIE procedure combines the advantages of minimally invasive operative approaches on especially postoperative pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy with the high safety of anastomosis and reconstruction achieved in OE. Further advantages are shorter duration of operation and shorter length of hospital stay in HMIE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background and aims: Caustic esophageal injury is a rare clinical condition in adult patients. Although dilatation, or the conservative approach, is the primary treatment method, some patients require surgical intervention. Because of the rarity of such cases, standard surgical treatment algorithms cannot be utilized. In this article, we present our surgical experience and discuss the challenges in the surgical management of corrosive injury of the esophagus in adults. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 28 patients who suffered from a corrosive esophageal injury between 1996 and 2011. Patient demographics, history of corrosive material ingestion, preoperative findings, treatment strategy, operative technique, postoperative course, requirements for further treatment, and the current status of the patients were investigated. Results: All patients underwent a transhiatal esophagectomy in addition to a gastric pull-up with a cervical esophagogastrostomy. The mean follow-up time was 62 (12–140) months. One patient developed a deep surgical infection; anastomotic stenosis was noted and treated with dilatation in 13 patients. The mean time period between the operation and the first dilatation for 12 patients was 81 (45–161) days. The mean dilatation count for the patients was 3 (1–10). Conclusion: Although it comes with high anastomotic stenosis rates, transhiatal esophagectomy and gastric pull-up with cervical anastomosis is a safe procedure, which can be performed for the treatment of corrosive esophageal stricture. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Hypopharyngeal cancers are uncommon. The management of advanced hypopharyngeal carcinomas has been a difficult problem. Surgical resection has been more successful. While many surgical methods have been used and reported pharyngolaryngo esophagectomy with gastric pull up remains the best option. This study documents our experience with patients who underwent total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy with immediate gastric pull-up for advanced carcinoma hypopharynx. The clinical data of 17 patients treated with pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy for advanced carcinoma of the hypopharynx between 2001 and 2004 was analyzed. All patients had advanced disease and required a gastric pull-up for reconstruction. Data obtained included age, sex, site, stage, post op complication, duration of follow up, recurrence & survival. Average age was 37.7 years and ranged from 27 to 56 years. There were 13 female patients and 4 male patients .13 patients presented with postcricoid tumours and 4 with posterior pharyngeal wall tumors, 13 patients presented with stage 3 tumors and 4 patients presented with stage 4 tumors. Wound infection was present in 2 patients (11.7%), anastomotic leak in 1(5.8%), hypocalcemia in 1(5.8%) and malignant pleural effusion in 1 patient (5.8%). Local recurrence occurred in 1(5.8%) while nodal recurrence occurred in 5(29.4%) patient. The average over all survival in our study was 19.5 months and ranged from 2 to 101 months. The gastric pull-up operation is a useful and effective method for the immediate reconstruction of the advanced hypopharyngeal malignancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Minimally invasive esophagectomy and gastric pull-up is a widely accepted method in adults. However, the experience in the pediatric population is limited. Minimally invasive esophagectomy represents a new alternative technique to the conventional open approach. We wish to report our small case series of minimally invasive esophagectomy and gastric pull-up in pediatric patients. The aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of the procedure.Methods: Three patients (2 girls and 1 boy) with average age 46 months (34-57 months) and average weight 12.6 kg (11-15 kg) underwent the procedure. The indications for esophagectomy were esophageal stricture from caustic ingestion (2 patients) and failed repair of esophageal atresia (1 patient).Results: Average operative time was 7 h (0519-0752 hours). There were no intraoperative complications with the average blood loss of 50 cc (5-125 cc). No anastomotic leaks were noted on the initial esophagrams that were obtained on postoperative day five or six. One patient developed a cervical wound infection on postoperative day seven due to a retained piece of Penrose, which required a neck exploration, removal of foreign body and repair of a small leak. One patient developed an anastomotic stricture at the 7-month follow-up. She was successfully treated with two balloon dilatations. One patient developed a delayed esophagogastric anastomotic leak at 3 months. The leak spontaneously closed after surgical drainage. At average of 22-month follow-up (15-36 months), all patients were eating regular food with excellent weight gain.Conclusion: Minimally invasive esophagectomy and gastric pull-up is technically challenging but feasible and safe with acceptable outcomes. However, further study is needed to further validate the approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine the early and long-term morbidity of patients treated with a total laryngopharyngectomy and reconstruction using a jejunum interposition or gastric pull-up procedure. It is a retrospective study; and it is conducted in tertiairy referral center. Sixty-three patients were included in whom 70 reconstructions were performed (51 jejunum interpositions and 19 gastric pull-up procedures) between 1990 and 2007. The studied parameters were success rate of the reconstruction, early and long-term complication rate, and functional outcome including quality of life. Subjective quality of life analysis was determined by two questionnaires: the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 Dutch version 3.0, and the EORTC-Head and Neck (H & N 35). The success rates were 84 and 74%, respectively. The procedures were associated with a high complication rate (63% after jejunum interposition and 89% after gastric pull-up), and a lengthy rehabilitation. Surviving patients were found to have a good long-term quality of life. Complete oral intake was achieved in 97%, and speech rehabilitation in 95%. These procedures are associated with significant morbidity, high complication rates, lengthy rehabilitation, but a good long-term quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of European Surgery: ACA Acta Chirurgica Austriaca is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

We present two patients who developed delayed fistulisation following esophageal replacement surgery. The first is a 13-year-old child who, at the age of 3 years, underwent a trans-mediastinal colonic esophageal replacement for a refractory corrosive injury followed by a retrosternal reverse gastric tube after an early catastrophic leak. Ten years later, he presented with a history of intermittent chest pain for 6 months. He developed a tension pneumopericardial tamponade caused by a fistula between gastric tube and pericardium. He recovered after sternotomy. The second was born prematurely with type C esophageal atresia and other malformations. After esophageal anastomosis, he developed a refractory stricture that was resected at 10 months. Despite a fundoplication at 4 years, the recurrent esophageal stricture required resection at 14 years, accomplished by mobilizing the stomach into the chest through a left thoracoabdominal incision. The postoperative course was complicated by a gastric leak in the chest with empyema, but the patient recovered and was able to eat. Five years later, he underwent an anterior spinal fusion to correct a worsening kyphoscoliosis. Postoperatively, he developed an ARDS picture, leakage of air through the gastrostomy, and a fatal pulmonary hemorrhage secondary to a gastrobronchial fistula. Fistulisation from esophageal replacement surgery represents a rare long-term complication that pediatric surgeons need to be aware of. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the operative outcomes of a gastric pull-up and free jejunal graft reconstruction after resection of hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal carcinoma. Records of all patients who underwent esophageal resection for carcinoma of the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus were reviewed. Reconstruction after esophagectomy was performed using the gastric pull-up ( n = 38) or free jejunal graft ( n = 14) techniques. The hypopharynx was the most common primary tumor site for the free jejunal graft group, whereas the gastric pull-up group had lesions more frequently in the cervical esophagus ( P < 0.05). Both operative time and blood loss in the gastric pull-up group were significantly longer and excessive than those of the free jejunal graft group ( P < 0.05). The graft survival rate was 95% (32/34) in the gastric pull-up group and 93% (13/14) for the free jejunal transfer group. The overall leakage rate was 1.9% (1/52). Three patients died (6%) in the postoperative period. There was no significant difference with regard to operative morbidity and mortality between the gastric pull-up group and free jejunal graft group. In conclusion, both free jejunal graft and gastric pull-up are safe and effective methods for the immediate restoration of alimentary continuity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gastric pull-up is the most frequent reconstruction after esophagectomy. In this report we aimed to compare gastric pull-up with colonic interposition in terms of graft function and patient satisfaction. Of 62 patients undergoing esophagectomy, reconstruction was performed by colonic interposition in 11 and gastric pull-up in 51 (without pyloric drainage in 44 and with pyloric drainage in 7). All esophagectomies were performed transhiatally. Patient follow-up ranged from 6 to 132 months (median 14 months). Follow-up examinations were performed 1, 9, 15, and 24 months postoperatively. The following factors were evaluated: time to the start of oral liquid and solid nutrients without vomiting, frequency of regurgitation, presence of pillow staining (night regurgitation), postprandial fullness, and degree of satisfaction during and after eating compared between groups undergoing colonic interposition and gastric pull-up with or without pyloric drainage. Among patients undergoing gastric pull-up, regurgitation was observed in 22% to 27% during follow-up. None of the patients with colonic interposition had reflux or regurgitation. Twenty-five percent of patients with gastric pull-up without drainage and 66% of patients with gastric pull-up plus drainage had reflux esophagitis at 15 months. No esophagitis was observed in patients with colonic interposition during the same period. Overall satisfaction was superior in patients undergoing colonic interposition followed by gastric pull-up with no drainage. Colonic interposition after esophageal resection is a viable option. Our study suggests that function of the replacement is better in this group of patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We present what we believe to be the first case of a bronchogastric fistula successfully treated with a plastic-covered metallic bronchial stent. This developed 5 years after a transhiatal oesophagectomy with gastric pull-up for carcinoma of the oesophagus. The successful outcome in this case suggests that this method of treatment should be considered in patients in whom this post-operative complication cannot be managed easily by other means. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Between 1991 and 1998, 28 out of 356 neonates with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EATEF) required esophageal substitution. As only 8 returned (28%) for the esophageal replacement after initial esophagostomy and gastrostomy at our center, we were prompted to offer single-stage esophageal replacement when the primary repair had either failed or was not found feasible. Twelve full-term neonates (mean birth weight 2.32 kg) with EATEF who underwent esophageal replacement by gastric pull-up between 1998 and 2000 were reviewed. The indications were: major leak after primary repair (n=9); pure EA (n=2); and EATEF with a very wide gap (n=1). The average ages at presentation and gastric pull-up were 6.0 and 8.5 days, respectively. The patients were evaluated for gastric transit by a colloid radiopharmaceutical, for duodenogastric reflux (DGR) by hepatic immunodiacetic acid (HIDA) scan, and for gastric clearance and transit by contrast studies. Three patients had minimal leaks from the neck site, all of which healed well. Follow-up with nuclear scans and contrast studies to evaluate gastric emptying revealed obstruction in 1 case and DGR in 25% of cases. There were 2 deaths (16%), 1 due to complex congenital cardiac disease and the other due to septicemia. In view of the acceptable morbidity, mortality, and functional outcome following gastric pull-up, we recommend this procedure if it becomes inevitable in the neonatal period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]