Search

Abstract Mutual adaptive timing (MAT), the capacity to adapt one's timing to the timing of a partner, is a form of interpersonal entrainment necessary to play music in ensemble. To this respect, two questions can be advanced. First, whether MAT can be seen also in non-musician populations. This might imply interesting theoretical consequences with respect to the hypothesis of an innate inter-subjective musicality. Second, whether subject's MAT can be influenced by the position of the partner's body. This might imply that MAT modulation is guided by changes in the feeling of body ownership and agency, which in turn would affect subject's cortico-spinal excitability patterns. In order to test these hypotheses, we employed an alternate joint finger tapping task (which can be easily carried out without being expert performers), while single-pulse TMS was delivered on M1. This experimental design allowed us to test MAT in non-musicians and to study cortico-spinal excitability patterns while manipulating partners' body position. Ownership and agency were tested by ad hoc questionnaires. We first found that MAT was present also in a non-musicians population and was not affected by the position of the partner, thus pointing to the universality of such a joint proto-musical competence. Moreover, cortico-spinal excitability was similar when the subject tapped alone ('solo condition') and when the subject tapped with the partner in a position congruent with the subject's body (the 'egocentric condition'). On the contrary, when the subject tapped with the partner placed in front of him (the 'allocentric' condition') cortico-spinal excitability was higher with respect to the solo and egocentric conditions. These results show that, despite the fact that the partner was present both in the egocentric and in the allocentric position, only the allocentric condition was treated as a social ensemble. Interestingly, in the egocentric condition the partner's body seemed to be treated as the subject's 'own' body. The subjective feeling of ownership and agency were coherent with the physiological data. Highlights • Mutual adaptive timing (MAT) was found in pairs of non musicians tapping in alternation. • MAT is not affected by the partners' body position, allocentric (A) or egocentric (E). • In E the other's hand was treated as one's own while in A as social ensemble. • Motor evoked potentials to TMS over M1 were higher in the A condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent studies show that motor responses similar to those present in one's own pain (freezing effect) occur as a result of observation of pain in others. This finding has been interpreted as the physiological basis of empathy. Alternatively, it can represent the physiological counterpart of an embodiment phenomenon related to the sense of body ownership. We compared the empathy and the ownership hypotheses by manipulating the perspective of the observed hand model receiving pain so that it could be a first-person perspective, the one in which embodiment occurs, or a third-person perspective, the one in which we usually perceive the others. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) by TMS over M1 were recorded from first dorsal interosseous muscle, whereas participants observed video clips showing (a) a needle penetrating or (b) a Q-tip touching a hand model, presented either in first-person or in third-person perspective. We found that a pain-specific inhibition of MEP amplitude (a significantly greater MEP reduction in the "pain" compared with the "touch" conditions) only pertains to the first-person perspective, and it is related to the strength of the self-reported embodiment. We interpreted this corticospinal modulation according to an "affective" conception of body ownership, suggesting that the body I feel as my own is the body I care more about. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the study of bodily awareness, the predictive coding theory has revealed that our brain continuously modulates sensory experiences to integrate them into a unitary body representation. Indeed, during multisensory illusions (e.g., the rubber hand illusion, RHI), the synchronous stroking of the participant's concealed hand and a fake visible one creates a visuotactile conflict, generating a prediction error. Within the predictive coding framework, through sensory processing modulation, prediction errors are solved, inducing participants to feel as if touches originated from the fake hand, thus ascribing the fake hand to their own body. Here, we aimed to address sensory processing modulation under multisensory conflict, by disentangling somatosensory and visual stimuli processing that are intrinsically associated during the illusion induction. To this aim, we designed two EEG experiments, in which somatosensory- (SEPs; Experiment 1; N  = 18; F  = 10) and visual-evoked potentials (VEPs; Experiment 2; N  = 18; F  = 9) were recorded in human males and females following the RHI. Our results show that, in both experiments, ERP amplitude is significantly modulated in the illusion as compared with both control and baseline conditions, with a modality-dependent diametrical pattern showing decreased SEP amplitude and increased VEP amplitude. Importantly, both somatosensory and visual modulations occur in long-latency time windows previously associated with tactile and visual awareness, thus explaining the illusion of perceiving touch at the sight location. In conclusion, we describe a diametrical modulation of somatosensory and visual processing as the neural mechanism that allows maintaining a stable body representation, by restoring visuotactile congruency under the occurrence of multisensory conflicts., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing financial interest., (Copyright © 2024 the authors.)

Peripersonal space (PPS) is a highly plastic "invisible bubble" surrounding the body whose boundaries are mapped through multisensory integration. Yet, it is unclear how the spatial proximity to others alters PPS boundaries. Across five experiments (N = 80), by recording behavioral and electrophysiological responses to visuo-tactile stimuli, we demonstrate that the proximity to others induces plastic changes in the neural PPS representation. The spatial proximity to someone else's hand shrinks the portion of space within which multisensory responses occur, thus reducing the PPS boundaries. This suggests that PPS representation, built from bodily and multisensory signals, plastically adapts to the presence of conspecifics to define the self-other boundaries, so that what is usually coded as "my space" is recoded as "your space". When the space is shared with conspecifics, it seems adaptive to move the other-space away from the self-space to discriminate whether external events pertain to the self-body or to other-bodies., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2022 The Author(s).)