Search

Anal carcinoma is an uncommon disorder accounting for less than 2% of large bowel malignancies and 1-6% of anorectal tumours. Its incidence ranges between 0.5 and 1% per 100,000. Local staging should be done with MR imaging using an external pelvic phased-array coil. Treatment strategy should be optimally discussed in a multidisciplinary team. HIV-positive patients seem to achieve similar response rate and overall survival to HIV-negative patients but with increased toxicity and higher local recurrences. Combined modality treatment with irradiation and chemotherapy has resulted in complete response over 90% and local control over 85%. This guide gives recommendations for diagnosis, staging and treatment.

Purpose: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the treatment of choice for rectal cancer (RC), but half of the patients do not respond, suffer unnecessary toxicities, and surgery delays. We aimed to develop a model that could predict a clinically meaningful response to CRT by using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsies., Experimental Design: We first carried out an exploratory screening of candidate genes by using SAGE technology to evaluate dynamic changes in the RC transcriptome in selected refractory patients before and after CRT. Next, 53 genes (24 from SAGE and 29 from the literature) were analyzed by qPCR arrays in FFPE initial biopsies from 94 stage II/III RC patients who were preoperatively treated with CRT. Tumor response was defined by using Dworak's tumor regression grade (2-3-4 vs. 0-1). Multivariate Cox methods and stepwise algorithms were applied to generate an optimized predictor of response and outcome., Results: In the training cohort (57 patients), a 13-gene signature predicted tumor response with 86% accuracy, 87% sensitivity, and 82% specificity. In a testing cohort (37 patients), the model correctly classified 6 of 7 nonresponders, with an overall accuracy of 76%. A signature-based score identified patients with a higher risk of relapse in univariate (3-year disease-free survival 64% vs. 90%, P = 0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR = 4.35 95% CI: 1.2-15.75, P = 0.02), in which it remained the only statistically significant prognostic factor., Conclusions: A basal 13-gene signature efficiently predicted CRT response and outcome. Multicentric validation by the GEMCAD collaborative group is currently ongoing. If confirmed, the predictor could be used to improve patient selection in RC studies., (©2011 AACR.)

The purpose of the study was to prospectively explore the role of serum MMP-7 as a predictive and prognostic marker of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy and irinotecan efficacy in third-line advanced colorectal cancer therapy. One hundred patients were recruited prospectively from six Spanish hospitals. Patients were treated with biweekly irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) and cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) (loading dose) and weekly cetuximab 250 mg/m(2) until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Baseline MMP-7 was determined using a quantitative solid-phase sandwich ELISA. KRAS and BRAF mutational status were also assessed. The clinical endpoints examined were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response rate. No association between serum MMP-7 and neither KRAS nor BRAF mutational status was found. The multivariate analysis revealed that MMP-7 predicts PFS both in wild-type (WT) KRAS patients (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06; p = 0.046) and in mutant KRAS patients (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.35; p = 0.036). The presence of mutant BRAF was associated with shorter PFS (HR 8.49, 95% CI 2.88-25.0; p < 0.001) and worse OS (HR 3.55, 95% CI 1.39-9.09; p = 0.008) in the subset of WT KRAS patients. Serum MMP-7 is associated with PFS in colorectal patients treated with anti-EGFR therapy as third-line treatment independently of KRAS status.

Background: By transactivacion, phosphorylated insulin growth factor receptor I (IGF-1R) can activate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). MMP-7, produced by colorectal cancer cells, also can activate IGF-1R by degrading IGFBP-3 and releasing IGF-I., Methods: A cohort of patients (pts) with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), under second- or third-line treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab, was tested using immunohistochemistry for expression of the activated form of IGF-1R (p-IGF-1R) and MMP-7. KRAS and BRAF mutation status was determined by sequencing and allelic discrimination analysis, respectively. Analyses were performed in primary CRC tumor samples or metastases, and the association of immunohistochemistry findings, mutational results, and treatment outcomes was investigated in both univariate and multivariate analyses., Results: Expression of activated IGF-1R and MMP-7 was observed in 51 and 49% of pts, respectively. Co-expression of MMP-7 and pIGF-1R (double positivity, DP) was observed in 28 pts (25%). There was no association between KRAS or BRAF mutational status and DP (p=0.52). Pts with DP responded more poorly to first-line chemotherapy (p=0.005) and to anti-EGFR treatment (p=0.01) than non-DP pts. In wild type (WT) KRAS pts, those with DP have poorer PFS (2.7 months vs. 3.5m, p=0.036; HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.05-3.75) and OS (6.4 months vs. 8.6 m, p=0.010; HR 2.33, 95%CI 1.23-4.43) in the adjusted multivariate analysis., Conclusions: Our study suggests that concomitant expression of MMP-7 and activation of p-IGF-1R (DP) correlates with poor prognosis in WT KRAS pts treated with anti-EGFR.

The annual regeneration cycle of deer (Cervidae, Artiodactyla) antlers represents a unique model of epimorphic regeneration and rapid growth in adult mammals. Regenerating antlers are innervated by trigeminal sensory axons growing through the velvet, the modified form of skin that envelopes the antler, at elongation velocities that reach one centimetre per day in the common deer (Cervus elaphus). Several axon growth promoters like NT-3, NGF or IGF-1 have been described in the antler. To increase the knowledge on the axon growth environment, we have combined different gene-expression techniques to identify and characterize the expression of promoting molecules not previously described in the antler velvet. Cross-species microarray analyses of deer samples on human arrays allowed us to build up a list of 90 extracellular or membrane molecules involved in axon growth that were potentially being expressed in the antler. Fifteen of these genes were analysed using PCR and sequencing techniques to confirm their expression in the velvet and to compare it with the expression in other antler and skin samples. Expression of 8 axon growth promoters was confirmed in the velvet, 5 of them not previously described in the antler. In conclusion, our work shows that antler velvet provides growing axons with a variety of promoters of axon growth, sharing many of them with deer's normal and pedicle skin.

PURPOSE The optimal therapeutic sequence of the adjuvant chemotherapy component of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is controversial. Induction chemotherapy before preoperative CRT may be associated with better efficacy and compliance. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 108 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were randomly assigned to arm A-preoperative CRT with capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and concurrent radiation followed by surgery and four cycles of postoperative adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX)-or arm B-induction CAPOX followed by CRT and surgery. The primary end point was pathologic complete response rate (pCR). Results On an intention-to-treat basis, the pCR for arms A and B were 13.5% (95% CI, 5.6% to 25.8%) and 14.3% (95% CI, 6.4% to 26.2%), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in other end points, including downstaging, tumor regression, and R0 resection. Overall, chemotherapy treatment exposure was higher in arm B than in arm A for both oxaliplatin (P < .0001) and capecitabine (P < .0001). During CRT, grades 3 to 4 adverse events were similar in both arms but were significantly higher in arm A during postoperative adjuvant CT than with induction CT in arm B. There were three deaths in each arm during the treatment period. CONCLUSION Compared with postoperative adjuvant CAPOX, induction CAPOX before CRT had similar pCR and complete resection rates. It did achieve more favorable compliance and toxicity profiles. On the basis of these findings, a phase III study to definitively test the induction strategy is warranted.

Purpose: To assess tolerance and efficacy of preoperative treatment with uracil/tegafur and radiotherapy (RT) followed by surgery and postoperative flurouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) in patients with rectal cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients (n = 94) with potentially resectable tumors, ultrasound at stages T2N+ (n = 4), T3 (n = 77), T4 (n = 13) were treated with UFT (400 mg/m2/d, 5 days a week for 5 weeks) and concomitant RT to the pelvis (45 Gy; 1.8 Gy/d over 5 weeks). Patients underwent surgery 5 to 6 weeks later followed by four cycles of FU/LV. Primary end points included downstaging, pathologic responses, and sphincter-preserving surgery. Secondary end points were recurrence-free survival and overall survival., Results: All patients received the full RT dose. Fifteen patients (16%) needed UFT dose reduction. Preoperative G3+ toxicities included diarrhea (14%), leukopenia (1%), thrombocytopenia (1%), and nausea (4%). The downstaging rate was 54%, pathologic complete response (pCR) was 9% and, in an additional 23%, there were only residual microscopic foci. When cellular viability criteria were taken into account, the pCR was 15%. From 43 patients with abdominoperineal resection indication, 11 (25%) had sphincter-preserving surgery performed. Postoperative scheduled chemotherapy dose was not administered to 24% of patients because of G3+ toxicity (diarrhea, 8%; mucositis, 9%; and leukopenia, 7%). Patients with downstaging had significantly higher survival and recurrence-free survival rates than those without. At 3 years, actuarial patterns of failure were pelvic, 5% and distant, 11%. OS was 75%., Conclusion: UFT combined with RT is safe and effective. In resectable rectal cancer, if preoperative treatment is considered, this approach can be an option., (Copyright 2004 American Society of Clinical Onocology)

The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of tegafur and uracil (UFT; 1:4 molar ratio) plus leucovorin (LV) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. One hundred forty-one patients were entered into the study. The treatment schedule consisted of UFT 300 mg/m2/day (in three divided doses) plus oral LV 150 mg/day (50 mg t.i.d.) over 28 days. The treatment cycle was repeated every 5 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity was observed. The treatment was interrupted if grade 3/4 toxicity appeared and was resumed at the same dosage on recovery. One hundred thirty-six patients were evaluable for response and 141 were evaluable for toxicity. The response rate was 19.9% (95% confidence interval: 12%-28%). The total number of patients without progression (objective response + stable disease) was 76 (55.9%). The median time to progression was 5.6 months, and the overall survival was 11.6 months. The toxicity profile was low, with 11% of patients experiencing grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting, while 17% had grade 3/4 diarrhea. Oral administration of UFT modulated with LV is a comfortable regimen of chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Mitonafide was the first synthetized compound of a new series of 3-nitronaphthalimides with intercalative properties. A phase I study with a conventional escalation scheme was developed. The schedule of drug administration was a daily x 5 days by short (1 h) intravenous (i.v.) infusion, every 21 days. Thirty evaluable patients were treated at doses from 15.4 mg/m2/d x 5 days to 138.6 mg/m2/d x 5 days. The study was interrupted due to appearance of central nervous system toxicity in 5 patients treated at doses above 118 mg/m2 x 5 days. This toxicity consisted firstly of loss of memory in all patients. It was irreversible and progressed in 3 patients to disorientation and confusion, leading to dementia in one of them. This was considered to be dose-limiting toxicity, and since it appeared to be related to the administration schedule, no further studies with short i.v. infusions of mitonafide are recommended. A phase I study utilizing a more desirable administration schedule over longer periods of time is ongoing in other centers.