51. Probabilistic Evaluation of Drought in CMIP6 Simulations
- Author
-
Chandra Rupa Rajulapati, Efi Foufoula-Georgiou, Martyn P. Clark, Konstantinos M. Andreadis, Kevin E. Trenberth, and Simon Michael Papalexiou
- Subjects
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,02 engineering and technology ,Debris Flow and Landslides ,Biogeosciences ,Volcanic Effects ,01 natural sciences ,Standard deviation ,Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience ,Global Change from Geodesy ,Volcanic Hazards and Risks ,Oceans ,Sea Level Change ,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) ,GE1-350 ,Hellinger distance ,Disaster Risk Analysis and Assessment ,QH540-549.5 ,General Environmental Science ,reliability of climate models ,droughts ,Climate and Interannual Variability ,Variance (accounting) ,Climate Impact ,climate change ,Earthquake Ground Motions and Engineering Seismology ,Explosive Volcanism ,Earth System Modeling ,Atmospheric Processes ,CMIP6: Trends, Interactions, Evaluation, and Impacts ,Ocean Monitoring with Geodetic Techniques ,Ocean/Atmosphere Interactions ,Atmospheric ,Regional Modeling ,Global Climate Models ,Atmospheric Effects ,0207 environmental engineering ,Volcanology ,Hydrological Cycles and Budgets ,Decadal Ocean Variability ,Land/Atmosphere Interactions ,Geodesy and Gravity ,Global Change ,Precipitation ,Air/Sea Interactions ,Numerical Modeling ,Solid Earth ,CMIP6 ,Geological ,Ocean/Earth/atmosphere/hydrosphere/cryosphere interactions ,Water Cycles ,Modeling ,Avalanches ,Volcano Seismology ,15. Life on land ,Benefit‐cost Analysis ,Summary statistics ,Computational Geophysics ,Regional Climate Change ,Natural Hazards ,Abrupt/Rapid Climate Change ,Informatics ,Surface Waves and Tides ,Atmospheric Composition and Structure ,Volcano Monitoring ,Statistics ,Hydrological ,020701 environmental engineering ,Seismology ,Climatology ,Ecology ,Radio Oceanography ,Gravity and Isostasy ,Marine Geology and Geophysics ,Physical Modeling ,Oceanography: General ,Cryosphere ,Impacts of Global Change ,Oceanography: Physical ,Research Article ,Risk ,Oceanic ,Environmental Science and Management ,Theoretical Modeling ,Climate change ,precipitation ,Radio Science ,Atmospheric Sciences ,Tsunamis and Storm Surges ,Paleoceanography ,Climate Dynamics ,Numerical Solutions ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Climate Change and Variability ,Effusive Volcanism ,Drought ,Climate Variability ,Probabilistic logic ,General Circulation ,Policy Sciences ,Climate Impacts ,Floods ,Mud Volcanism ,Air/Sea Constituent Fluxes ,Environmental sciences ,Climate Action ,Mass Balance ,Ocean influence of Earth rotation ,13. Climate action ,Volcano/Climate Interactions ,Environmental science ,Climate model ,Hydrology ,Sea Level: Variations and Mean - Abstract
As droughts have widespread social and ecological impacts, it is critical to develop long‐term adaptation and mitigation strategies to reduce drought vulnerability. Climate models are important in quantifying drought changes. Here, we assess the ability of 285 CMIP6 historical simulations, from 17 models, to reproduce drought duration and severity in three observational data sets using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). We used summary statistics beyond the mean and standard deviation, and devised a novel probabilistic framework, based on the Hellinger distance, to quantify the difference between observed and simulated drought characteristics. Results show that many simulations have less than ±10% error in reproducing the observed drought summary statistics. The hypothesis that simulations and observations are described by the same distribution cannot be rejected for more than 80% of the grids based on our H distance framework. No single model stood out as demonstrating consistently better performance over large regions of the globe. The variance in drought statistics among the simulations is higher in the tropics compared to other latitudinal zones. Though the models capture the characteristics of dry spells well, there is considerable bias in low precipitation values. Good model performance in terms of SPI does not imply good performance in simulating low precipitation. Our study emphasizes the need to probabilistically evaluate climate model simulations in order to both pinpoint model weaknesses and identify a subset of best‐performing models that are useful for impact assessments., Key Points Simulations reproduce observed drought duration and severity in terms of the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) but simulated low precipitation is considerably biasedVariance in drought statistics among the simulations is higher in the tropics compared to other latitudinal zonesGood model performance in terms of SPI does not imply that low precipitation values are well simulated by the climate models
- Published
- 2021