Search

Background and Aims: Detecting NASH remains challenging, while at-risk NASH (steatohepatitis and F≥ 2) tends to progress and is of interest for drug development and clinical application. We developed prediction models by supervised machine learning techniques, with clinical data and biomarkers to stage and grade patients with NAFLD., Approach and Results: Learning data were collected in the Liver Investigation: Testing Marker Utility in Steatohepatitis metacohort (966 biopsy-proven NAFLD adults), staged and graded according to NASH CRN. Conditions of interest were the clinical trial definition of NASH (NAS ≥ 4;53%), at-risk NASH (NASH with F ≥ 2;35%), significant (F ≥ 2;47%), and advanced fibrosis (F ≥ 3;28%). Thirty-five predictors were included. Missing data were handled by multiple imputations. Data were randomly split into training/validation (75/25) sets. A gradient boosting machine was applied to develop 2 models for each condition: clinical versus extended (clinical and biomarkers). Two variants of the NASH and at-risk NASH models were constructed: direct and composite models.Clinical gradient boosting machine models for steatosis/inflammation/ballooning had AUCs of 0.94/0.79/0.72. There were no improvements when biomarkers were included. The direct NASH model produced AUCs (clinical/extended) of 0.61/0.65. The composite NASH model performed significantly better (0.71) for both variants. The composite at-risk NASH model had an AUC of 0.83 (clinical and extended), an improvement over the direct model. Significant fibrosis models had AUCs (clinical/extended) of 0.76/0.78. The extended advanced fibrosis model (0.86) performed significantly better than the clinical version (0.82)., Conclusions: Detection of NASH and at-risk NASH can be improved by constructing independent machine learning models for each component, using only clinical predictors. Adding biomarkers only improved the accuracy of fibrosis., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background and Aims: Chronic hepatitis B infection (defined as sustained detection of hepatitis B virus [HBV] surface antigen [HBsAg] protein in serum) is a leading cause of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related deaths. A situation analysis carried out by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health estimated the HBsAg prevalence in Switzerland to be 0.53% (95% CI: 0.32-0.89%) in 2015 (~44,000 cases). A lower prevalence of chronic HBV in the younger generation and the adoption of universal coverage in the first year of life are expected to decrease the burden of HBV; however, a number of people in key populations (including migrants) remain undiagnosed and untreated, and infected individuals remain at risk of progressing to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and death. Our primary objective was to examine the current and estimate the future disease burden of HBV in Switzerland and the impact of migration. The secondary objective was to estimate the impact of changing future treatment numbers., Methods: A modelling study was performed using an existing, validated model (PRoGReSs Model) applied to the Swiss context. Model inputs were selected through a literature search and expert consensus. Population data from the Federal Statistical Office were used alongside prevalence data from the Polaris Observatory to estimate the number of HBV infections among people born abroad. The PRoGReSs Model was populated with and calibrated to the available data and what-if scenarios were developed to explore the impact of intervention on the future burden of disease. A Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate 95% uncertainty intervals (95% UIs)., Results: In 2020, there were an estimated 50,100 (95% UI: 47,500-55,000) HBsAg+ cases among people born abroad. Among people born in Switzerland, there were approximately 62,700 (UI: 58,900-68,400) total HBV infections (0.72% [UI: 0.68-0.79%] prevalence). Prevalence among infants and children under the age of 5 were both <0.1%. By 2030, prevalence of HBV is expected to decrease, although morbidity and mortality will increase. Increasing diagnosis (90%) and treatment (80% of those eligible) to meet the global health sector strategy on viral hepatitis programme targets could prevent 120 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and 120 liver-related deaths., Conclusions: Thanks to the historical vaccination programmes and the continued rollout of universal 3-dose coverage in the first year of life, Switzerland is expected to exceed the global health sector strategy targets for the reduction of incidence. While overall prevalence is decreasing, the current diagnosis and treatment levels remain below global health sector strategy targets.

Background: Episodic angioedema with eosinophilia (EAE) (Gleich syndrome) is a rare disorder consisting of recurrent episodes of angioedema, hypereosinophilia, and frequent elevated serum IgM level., Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter nationwide study regarding the clinical spectrum and therapeutic management of patients with EAE in France., Results: A total of 30 patients with a median age at diagnosis of 41 years (range, 5-84) were included. The median duration of each crisis was 5.5 days (range, 1-90), with swelling affecting mainly the face and the upper limbs. Total serum IgM levels were increased in 20 patients (67%). Abnormal T-cell immunophenotypes were detected in 12 patients (40%), of whom 5 (17%) showed evidence of clonal T-cell receptor gamma locus gene (TRG) rearrangement. The median duration of follow-up was 53 months (range, 31-99). The presence of an abnormal T-cell population was the sole factor associated with a shorter time to flare (hazard ratio, 4.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-14.66; P = .02). At last follow-up, 3 patients (10%) were able to have all treatments withdrawn and 11 (37%) were in clinical and biologic remission with less than 10 mg of prednisone daily., Conclusion: EAE is a heterogeneous condition that encompasses several disease forms. Although patients usually respond well to glucocorticoids, those with evidence of abnormal T-cell phenotype have a shorter time to flare., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: We analysed the impact of perceived liver donor quality on transplant recipient outcomes., Methods: this prospective cohort study included all deceased liver donors during 2008-2018 in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. Perceived low-quality liver donors were defined when refused for ≥5 top listed recipients or for all recipients in at least one centre before being transplanted. The effect of liver donor quality on relisting or recipient death at 1 week and 1 year after transplantation was analysed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models. A 1:3 matching was also performed using a recipient score., Results: Of 973 liver donors, 187 (19.2%) had perceived poor-quality. Males, obesity, donation after circulatory death and alanine aminotransferase values were significantly associated with perceived poor-quality, with no significant effect of the perceived quality on re-listing or death within the first week and first year post-transplant [(aHR) = 1.45, 95% CI: (0.6, 3.5), P = 0.41 and aHR = 1.52 (95% CI 0.98-2.35), P = 0.06], adjusting by recipient age and gender, obesity, diabetes, prior liver transplantation and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. At 1 year, prior liver transplantation and higher MELD score associated with higher risk of re-listing or death., Conclusion: Comparable post-transplant outcomes with different perceived quality liver donors stresses the need to improve donor selection in liver transplantation., (© 2023 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.)

Biomarkers have the potential to accelerate drug development, as early indicators of improved clinical response, to improve patient safety, and for personalised medicine. However, few have been approved through the biomarker qualification pathways of the regulatory agencies. This paper outlines how biomarkers can accelerate drug development, and reviews the lessons learned by the EU IMI2-funded LITMUS consortium, which has had several interactions with regulatory agencies in both the US and EU regarding biomarker qualification in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Sharing knowledge of such interactions with the scientific community is of paramount importance to increase the chances of qualification of relevant biomarkers that may accelerate drug development, and thereby help patients, across disease indications. A qualified biomarker enables a decision to be made that all understand and support in a common framework., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Over the last decade, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has become an important public health issue worldwide. In many countries, MAFLD has become the most common cause of chronic liver disease. On the contrary, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mortality is rising. Liver tumors have become the third cause of cancer mortality worldwide. HCC is the most frequent liver tumor. While the burden of HCC related to viral hepatitis is declining, the prevalence of MAFLD-related HCC is rising rapidly. Classical screening criteria for HCC consider cirrhotic, advanced fibrosis, and viral hepatitis patients. Metabolic syndrome with liver involvement or MAFLD is associated with a higher risk of HCC development, even in the absence of cirrhosis. The question about the cost effectiveness of surveillance for HCC in MAFLD is yet not fully answered. There are no guidelines that address the question of when to start or how to define the population who can benefit of surveillance for HCC in MAFLD patients. This review aims to revise the evidence of HCC development in MAFLD. It hopes to be a step closer to defining screening criteria for HCC in MAFLD., Competing Interests: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: J.F.D. Advisory committees: Alentis, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Enyo, Esai, Falk, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Inventiva, Ipsen, Lilly, Madrigal, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Roche. Speaking and teaching: Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Intercept, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, and Roche. B.N.: none., (© The Author(s), 2023.)

Background & Aims: Lipid metabolism plays an important role in liver pathophysiology. The liver lobule asymmetrically distributes oxygen and nutrition, resulting in heterogeneous metabolic functions. Periportal and pericentral hepatocytes have different metabolic functions, which lead to generating liver zonation. We developed spatial metabolic imaging using desorption electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry to investigate lipid distribution across liver zonation with high reproducibility and accuracy., Methods: Fresh frozen livers from healthy mice with control diet were analysed using desorption electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry imaging. Imaging was performed at 50 μm × 50 μm pixel size. Regions of interest (ROIs) were manually created by co-registering with histological data to determine the spatial hepatic lipids across liver zonation. The ROIs were confirmed by double immunofluorescence. The mass list of specific ROIs was automatically created, and univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were performed to identify statistically significant lipids across liver zonation., Results: A wide range of lipid species was identified, including fatty acids, phospholipids, triacylglycerols, diacylglycerols, ceramides, and sphingolipids. We characterised hepatic lipid signatures in three different liver zones (periportal zone, midzone, and pericentral zone) and validated the reproducibility of our method for measuring a wide range of lipids. Fatty acids were predominantly detected in the periportal region, whereas phospholipids were distributed in both the periportal and pericentral zones. Interestingly, phosphatidylinositols, PI(36:2), PI(36:3), PI(36:4), PI(38:5), and PI(40:6) were located predominantly in the midzone (zone 2). Triacylglycerols and diacylglycerols were detected mainly in the pericentral region. De novo triacylglycerol biosynthesis appeared to be the most influenced pathway across the three zones., Conclusions: The ability to accurately assess zone-specific hepatic lipid distribution in the liver could lead to a better understanding of lipid metabolism during the progression of liver disease., Impact and Implications: Zone-specific hepatic lipid metabolism could play an important role in lipid homoeostasis during disease progression. Herein, we defined the zone-specific references of hepatic lipid species in the three liver zones using molecular imaging. The de novo triacylglycerol biosynthesis was highlighted as the most influenced pathway across the three zones., Competing Interests: EC is an employee of Waters Corporation. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background and Aims: Frailty is frequent in cirrhosis and associated with skeletal muscle abnormalities and worse prognosis. 2D shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE) could mirror biomechanical properties of skeletal muscle reflecting muscle quality. However, there is no data on 2D-SWE on skeletal muscle stiffness assessment in cirrhosis and on frailty., Methods: Outpatients with cirrhosis were prospectively included in a single center. Skeletal muscle stiffness was studied at the rectus femoris by 2D-SWE. Ileo-psoas area and index (area/height 2 ), and antero-posterior diameter of rectus femoris (RF) was measured on ultrasound., Results: We included 44 patients (24 male, age 59 [IQR 49-66]) with a median liver frailty index (LFI) of 3.7 (IQR 3.2-4.0). Measurement of RF muscle stiffness (RFMS) was feasible in all with high inter-measurement reproducibility. RFMS did not correlate with LFI, liver function and skeletal muscle diameters. Ileo-psoas index was lower in frail patients (1.7 vs 1.0 cm 2 /m 2 , p = 0.024). RF antero-posterior diameter inversely correlated with LFI (r -0.578: p<0.001)., Conclusion: RFMS by 2D-SWE is feasible and reproducible in cirrhosis and is independent of liver function and LFI, and warrants further studies in this setting. RF antero-posterior diameter could be reported as an objective parameter mirroring sarcopenia and frailty., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background: Liver biopsy for the diagnosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is limited by its inherent invasiveness and possible sampling errors. Some studies have shown that cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) concentrations may be useful in diagnosing NASH, but results across studies have been inconsistent. We aimed to identify the utility of CK-18 M30 concentrations as an alternative to liver biopsy for non-invasive identification of NASH., Methods: Individual data were collected from 14 registry centers on patients with biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and in all patients, circulating CK-18 M30 levels were measured. Individuals with a NAFLD activity score (NAS) ≥5 with a score of ≥1 for each of steatosis, ballooning, and lobular inflammation were diagnosed as having definite NASH; individuals with a NAS ≤2 and no fibrosis were diagnosed as having non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL)., Results: A total of 2571 participants were screened, and 1008 (153 with NAFL and 855 with NASH) were finally enrolled. Median CK-18 M30 levels were higher in patients with NASH than in those with NAFL (mean difference 177 U/L; standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.87 [0.69-1.04]). There was an interaction between CK-18 M30 levels and serum alanine aminotransferase, body mass index (BMI), and hypertension ( P  < 0.001, P  = 0.026 and P  = 0.049, respectively). CK-18 M30 levels were positively associated with histological NAS in most centers. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) for NASH was 0.750 (95% confidence intervals: 0.714-0.787), and CK-18 M30 at Youden's index maximum was 275.7 U/L. Both sensitivity (55% [52%-59%]) and positive predictive value (59%) were not ideal., Conclusion: This large multicenter registry study shows that CK-18 M30 measurement in isolation is of limited value for non-invasively diagnosing NASH., (Copyright © 2023 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license.)

Surgical liver failure (SLF) develops when a marginal amount of hepatic mass is left after surgery, such as following excessive resection. SLF is the commonest cause of death due to liver surgery; however, its etiology remains obscure. Using mouse models of standard hepatectomy (sHx) (68%, resulting in full regeneration) or extended hepatectomy (eHx) (86%/91%, causing SLF), we explored the causes of early SLF related to portal hyperafflux. Assessing the levels of HIF2A with or without oxygenating agent inositol trispyrophosphate (ITPP) indicated hypoxia early after eHx. Subsequently, lipid oxidation (PPARA/PGC1α) was downregulated and associated with persisting steatosis. Mild oxidation with low-dose ITPP reduced the levels of HIF2A, restored downstream PPARA/PGC1α expression along with lipid oxidation activities (LOAs), and normalized steatosis and other metabolic or regenerative SLF deficiencies. Promotion of LOA with L-carnitine likewise normalized the SLF phenotype, and both ITPP and L-carnitine markedly raised survival in lethal SLF. In patients who underwent hepatectomy, pronounced increases in serum carnitine levels (reflecting LOA) were associated with better recovery. Lipid oxidation thus provides a link between the hyperafflux of O 2 -poor portal blood, the metabolic/regenerative deficits, and the increased mortality typifying SLF. Stimulation of lipid oxidation-the prime regenerative energy source-particularly through L-carnitine may offer a safe and feasible way to reduce SLF risks in the clinic., (Copyright © 2022 American Society of Transplantation & American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often develops in patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis at an annual risk of up to 2.5%. Some host genetic risk factors have been identified but do not account for the majority of the variance in occurrence. This study aimed to identify novel susceptibility loci for the development of HCC in people with alcohol related cirrhosis., Design: Patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis and HCC (cases: n=1214) and controls without HCC (n=1866), recruited from Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Italy and the UK, were included in a two-stage genome-wide association study using a case-control design. A validation cohort of 1520 people misusing alcohol but with no evidence of liver disease was included to control for possible association effects with alcohol misuse. Genotyping was performed using the InfiniumGlobal Screening Array (V.24v2, Illumina) and the OmniExpress Array (V.24v1-0a, Illumina)., Results: Associations with variants rs738409 in PNPLA3 and rs58542926 in TM6SF2 previously associated with an increased risk of HCC in patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis were confirmed at genome-wide significance. A novel locus rs2242652(A) in TERT (telomerase reverse transcriptase) was also associated with a decreased risk of HCC, in the combined meta-analysis, at genome-wide significance (p=6.41×10 -9 , OR=0.61 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.70). This protective association remained significant after correction for sex, age, body mass index and type 2 diabetes (p=7.94×10 -5 , OR=0.63 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.79). Carriage of rs2242652(A) in TERT was associated with an increased leucocyte telomere length (p=2.12×10 -44 )., Conclusion: This study identifies rs2242652 in TERT as a novel protective factor for HCC in patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JT has received speaking and/or consulting fees from Versantis, Gore, Bayer, Alexion, Norgine, Grifols and CSL Behring., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Background & Aims: Single-agent anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors convey outstanding clinical benefits in a small fraction (∼20%) of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) but the molecular mechanisms determining response are unknown. To fill this gap, we herein analyze the molecular and immune traits of aHCC in patients treated with anti-PD1., Methods: Overall, 111 tumor samples from patients with aHCC were obtained from 13 centers before systemic therapies. We performed molecular analysis and immune deconvolution using whole-genome expression data (n = 83), mutational analysis (n = 72), and histologic evaluation with an endpoint of objective response., Results: Among 83 patients with transcriptomic data, 28 were treated in frontline, whereas 55 patients were treated after tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) either in second or third line. Responders treated in frontline showed upregulated interferon-γ signaling and major histocompatibility complex II-related antigen presentation. We generated an 11-gene signature (IFNAP), capturing these molecular features, which predicts response and survival in patients treated with anti-PD1 in frontline. The signature was validated in a separate cohort of aHCC and >240 patients with other solid cancer types where it also predicted response and survival. Of note, the same signature was unable to predict response in archival tissue of patients treated with frontline TKIs, highlighting the need for fresh biopsies before immunotherapy., Conclusion: Interferon signaling and major histocompatibility complex-related genes are key molecular features of HCCs responding to anti-PD1. A novel 11-gene signature predicts response in frontline aHCC, but not in patients pretreated with TKIs. These results must be confirmed in prospective studies and highlights the need for biopsies before immunotherapy to identify biomarkers of response., (Copyright © 2023 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Knowledge on SARS-CoV-2 infection and its resultant COVID-19 in liver diseases has rapidly increased during the pandemic. Hereby, we review COVID-19 liver manifestations and pathophysiological aspects related to SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients without liver disease as well as the impact of COVID-19 in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), particularly cirrhosis and liver transplantation (LT). SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with overt proinflammatory cytokine profile, which probably contributes substantially to the observed early and late liver abnormalities. CLD, particularly decompensated cirrhosis, should be regarded as a risk factor for severe COVID-19 and death. LT was impacted during the pandemic, mainly due to concerns regarding donation and infection in recipients. However, LT did not represent a risk factor per se of worse outcome. Even though scarce, data regarding COVID-19 specific therapy in special populations such as LT recipients seem promising. COVID-19 vaccine-induced immunity seems impaired in CLD and LT recipients, advocating for a revised schedule of vaccine administration in this population., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: The frequency of vasculitis may be increased in patients with Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF), according to several studies. Our aim was to assess the characteristics of French adult patients with both diseases., Methods: Patients with vasculitis were selected from patients followed for FMF in the French JIR-cohort., Results: Twenty-two patients were included [polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) n = 10, IgA vasculitis n = 8, unclassified vasculitis n = 2, granulomatosis with polyangiitis n = 1, and microscopic polyangiitis n = 1]. Pathogenic mutations in exon 10 were found in all 21 patients (96%) for which MEFV testing results were available, and 18 (82%) had two pathogenic mutations. Histology showed vasculitis in 59% of patients. Most patients with FMF-associated PAN were HBV-negative and had an inactive FMF before PAN onset, and 40% had a peri-renal or central nervous system bleeding. Most patients with FMF-associated IgA vasculitis had an active FMF before vasculitis onset, and 25% had digestive bleeding. Both patients with unclassified vasculitis had ischemic and/or hemorrhagic complications., Conclusion: This study confirms the predominance of PAN and IgA vasculitis in patients with FMF and the high frequency of bleeding in FMF-associated PAN. FMF should be considered in case of persistent symptoms and/or inflammatory syndrome despite vasculitis treatment in Mediterranean patients., Competing Interests: SG-L and GG received honoraria as speakers or occasional consultants for the SOBI and Novartis laboratories (5000 euros). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Abbara, Monfort, Savey, Moguelet, Saadoun, Bachmeyer, Fain, Terrier, Amoura, Mathian, Gilardin, Buob, Job-Deslandre, Dufour, Sberro-Soussan, Grateau and Georgin-Lavialle.)

In the last decade, body composition (BC) assessment has emerged as an innovative tool that can offer valuable data concerning nutritional status in addition to the information provided by the classical parameters (i.e., body mass index, albumin). Furthermore, published data have revealed that different types of body composition are associated with different outcomes. For example, abnormalities of skeletal muscle, a common finding in cirrhotic and oncologic patients, are associated with poor outcome (i.e., high morbidity and high mortality). The disposition (visceral/subcutaneous adipose tissue) and radiodensity of adipose tissue proved to also be determinant factors for HCC outcome. Despite all the advantages, BC assessment is not part of the standard pre-therapeutic workup. The main reasons are the high heterogeneity of data, the paucity of prospective studies, the lack of a standard assessment method, and the interpopulation variation of BC. This paper aims to review the available evidence regarding the role of BC as a prognostic tool in the HCC population undergoing various therapies.

Background & Aims: We investigated the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received ICI-based therapies in a previous systemic line., Methods: In this international, retrospective multicenter study, patients with HCC who received at least two lines of ICI-based therapies (ICI-1, ICI-2) at 14 institutions were eligible. The main outcomes included best overall response and treatment-related adverse events., Results: Of 994 ICI-treated patients screened, a total of 58 patients (male, n = 41; 71%) with a mean age of 65.0±9.0 years were included. Median systemic treatment lines of ICI-1 and ICI-2 were 1 (range, 1-4) and 3 (range, 2-9), respectively. ICI-based therapies used at ICI-1 and ICI-2 included ICI alone (ICI-1, n = 26, 45%; ICI-2, n = 4, 7%), dual ICI regimens (n = 1, 2%; n = 12, 21%), or ICI combined with targeted therapies/anti-VEGF (n = 31, 53%; n = 42, 72%). Most patients discontinued ICI-1 due to progression (n = 52, 90%). Objective response rate was 22% at ICI-1 and 26% at ICI-2. Responses at ICI-2 were also seen in patients who had progressive disease as best overall response at ICI-1 (n = 11/21; 52%). Median time-to-progression at ICI-1 and ICI-2 was 5.4 (95% CI 3.0-7.7) months and 5.2 (95% CI 3.3-7.0) months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-4 at ICI-1 and ICI-2 were observed in 9 (16%) and 10 (17%) patients, respectively., Conclusions: ICI rechallenge was safe and resulted in a treatment benefit in a meaningful proportion of patients with HCC. These data provide a rationale for investigating ICI-based regimens in patients who progressed on first-line immunotherapy in prospective trials., Impact and Implications: Therapeutic sequencing after first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a challenge as no available second-line treatment options have been studied in immunotherapy-pretreated patients. Particularly, the role of ICI rechallenge in patients with HCC is unclear, as data from prospective trials are lacking. We investigated the efficacy and safety of ICI-based regimens in patients with HCC pretreated with immunotherapy in a retrospective, international, multicenter study. Our data provide the rationale for prospective trials investigating the role of ICI-based regimens in patients who have progressed on first-line immunotherapy., Competing Interests: BS received travel support from AbbVie, Ipsen and Gilead. DR has received advisory fees from Bayer and speakers fees as well as travel grants from Ipsen. He is an investigator for Bayer, BMS, Lilly, AstraZeneca and Roche. SP has nothing to disclose. ML has nothing to disclose. KP has nothing to disclose. TP received consulting fees from IQVIA and Bayer; and institutional research funding from Lilly, Roche, Bayer. AC has nothing to disclose. TWF has nothing to disclose. JVF has received advisory board fees from Roche. KS served as consultant for Ipsen and Bayer, and conducts studies for Bayer, Roche, Lilly, MSD, and BMS. VH has nothing to disclose. FF received travel support from Abbvie and Novartis, and speaker fees from Abbvie and MSD. AD has nothing to disclose. ARS has served at advisory boards and received consulting honoraria from AMGEN, AAA, Bayer, BMS, IPSEN, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Servier. KS has nothing to disclose. PR has nothing to disclose. BiS has nothing to disclose. MPE received consulting honoraria from BMS and MSD. AT received consulting honoraria and/or lecture fees from Bayer, IPSEN, Lilly, BMS, Eisai Novartis, Roche, Intercept, Falk, AbbVie, and Gilead. He received travel grants from IPSEN, AbbVie, and Gilead. He is an investigator for IPSEN and GILEAD. AngD received advisory board fees from Roche and BMS, and travel support from Roche and Ipsen. FH received travel support from Bayer, Abbvie, and Gilead. LB has nothing to disclose. ABP has nothing to disclose. DH received research support from Pfizer. MV received speaker fees from Nordic Pharma, Ipsen, Merck Serono, Bayer Vital, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), and Sirtex, advisory board fees from Roche, Ipsen, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Eisai, AstraZeneca and Amgen, research grants from Sirtex. FS has nothing to disclose. MT received speaker fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Falk Foundation, Gilead, Intercept and Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD); advisory board fees from Abbvie, Albireo, Boehringer Ingelheim, BiomX, Falk Pharma GmbH, GENFIT, Gilead, Intercept, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Phenex, Regulus and Shire; travel grants from AbbVie, Falk, Gilead, and Intercept; and research grants from Albireo, CymaBay, Falk, Gilead, Intercept, MSD, and Takeda. He is also coinventor of patents on the medical use of norUDCA filed by the Medical University of Graz. ADA received travel support and consultancy fees from Roche. CAMF has nothing to disclose. DJP received lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare, Bayer Healthcare, BMS, Roche, Eisai, Falk Foundation, travel expenses from BMS and Bayer Healthcare; consulting fees for Mina Therapeutics, EISAI, Roche, DaVolterra, Mursla, Exact Sciences and Astra Zeneca; research funding (to institution) from MSD and BMS. MPR is advisor/consultant for Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, and Roche; he served as a speaker for Bayer, Eisai, Ipsen, Lilly, and Roche; he is an investigator for Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Exelixis, Lilly, and Roche. JFD received compensations as a member of scientific advisory boards of Abbvie, Bayer, Bristol–Myers Squibb, Falk, Galapagos, Genfit, Genkyotex, Gilead Sciences, HepaRegenix, Intercept, Lilly, Merck, and Novartis. AW received compensations as a member of scientific advisory boards for BMS, Wako and Sanofi. He served as a speaker for Leo Pharma, Eisai, Ipsen and Roche and received travel support from Merck and Servier. AEK has received consulting fees from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Bayer, CymaBay, Escient, FMC, Gilead, GSK, Guidepoint, Intercept, Mirum, Medscape, MSD, Myr, Viofor; lecture fees from Abbvie, AOP Orphan, Bayer, BMS, CMS, CymaBay, Eisai, Falk, Gilead, GSK, Intercept, Janssen, Newbridge, Novartis, Lilly, MSD, Zambon; and institutional research funding from Intercept. AGS served on advisory boards and as a consultant for Genentech, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Bayer, Exelixis, TARGET RWE, FujiFilm Medical Sciences, Glycotest, Exact Sciences, GRAIL, and Freenome. ENDT has served as a paid consultant for AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, EISAI, Eli Lilly & Co, MSD, Mallinckrodt, Omega, Pfizer, IPSEN, Terumo and Roche. He has received reimbursement of meeting attendance fees and travel expenses from Arqule, Astrazeneca, BMS, Bayer, Celsion and Roche, and lecture honoraria from BMS and Falk. He has received third-party funding for scientific research from Arqule, AstraZeneca, BMS, Bayer, Eli Lilly, and IPSEN and Roche. LR has received consulting fees from Amgen, ArQule, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, Exelixis, Genenta, Hengrui, Incyte, Ipsen, IQVIA, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Taiho Oncology, Zymeworks; lectures fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Eisai, Gilead, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi, Servier; travel expenses from AstraZeneca; and institutional research funding from Agios, ARMO BioSciences, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Eisai, Exelixis, Fibrogen, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Zymeworks. MP is an investigator for Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Lilly, and Roche; he received speaker honoraria from Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Lilly, MSD, and Roche; he is a consultant for Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, and Roche; he received travel support from Bayer, BMS, and Roche. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (© 2022 The Author(s).)

Background: There is limited information on the effects of statins on the outcomes of liver transplantation (LT), regarding either their use by LT recipients or donors., Aim: To analyse the association between statin exposure and recipient and graft survival., Methods: We included adult LT recipients with deceased donors in a nationwide prospective database study. Using a multistate modelling approach, we examined the effect of statins on the transition hazard between LT, biliary and vascular complications and death, allowing for recurring events. The observation time was 3 years., Results: We included 998 (696 male, 70%, mean age 54.46 ± 11.14 years) LT recipients. 14% of donors and 19% of recipients were exposed to statins during the study period. During follow-up, 141 patients died; there were 40 re-LT and 363 complications, with 66 patients having two or more complications. Treatment with statins in the recipient was modelled as a concurrent covariate and associated with lower mortality after LT (HR = 0.35; 95% CI 0.12-0.98; p = 0.047), as well as a significant reduction of re-LT (p = 0.004). However, it was not associated with lower incidence of complications (HR = 1.25; 95% CI = 0.85-1.83; p = 0.266). Moreover, in patients developing complications, statin use was significantly associated with decreased mortality (HR = 0.10; 95% CI = 0.01-0.81; p = 0.030), and reduced recurrence of complications (HR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.20-0.93; p = 0.032)., Conclusions: Statin use by LT recipients may confer a survival advantage. Statin administration should be encouraged in LT recipients when clinically indicated., (© 2022 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: To describe the characteristics, treatment and outcome of patients with immune thrombocytopenia with clinical significance (ITPCS) associated with SLE., Methods: This retrospective multicentre study included SLE patients who experienced ≥1 ITPCS (defined as ITP with attributable bleeding disorders and/or a platelet count <30×109/l). Other causes of secondary thrombocytopenia were excluded. Major bleeding event (MBG) was defined as Khellaf score >8 and/or WHO score >2., Results: A total of 90 patients were included, the median (range) follow-up duration was 80 (6-446) months. ITP was diagnosed before SLE in 25 patients. They presented a high rate of autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (15%), antiphospholipid antibody (62%) and antiphospholipid syndrome (19%). The 25 (28%) patients who experienced MBG had significantly more bleedings at ITP diagnosis and higher bleeding scores, and serositis and thrombosis during follow-up. They required significantly more treatment lines, transfusions and hospitalizations. The 11 (12%) patients who experienced no bleeding event presented a significantly more restricted SLE phenotype (cutaneous and/or articular). Patients received a mean (range) of 4.2 (1-11) treatment lines. Corticosteroids and HCQ allowed ITPCS overall response in one-third of patients. The median relapse-free survival of rituximab (n = 34), AZA (n = 19), MMF (n = 8), thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (n = 16) and splenectomy (n = 19) were 53, 31.5, 61, 24.5 and 78 months, respectively. Four patients experienced thrombotic events after splenectomy and one occurred under thrombopoietin-receptor agonist treatment., Conclusion: SLE-ITCS patients displayed a high rate of haematological abnormalities and MBG patients exhibited higher morbidity. Management of thrombocytopenia was highly heterogeneous and many options seem viable., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims of the Study: Since 2014, the Swiss Hepatitis Strategy (SHS) has targeted the elimination of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) in Switzerland. The epidemiology of HCV is diverse across Swiss cantons, therefore cantonal-level screening and treatment strategies should be developed. This study aimed to identify scenarios to achieve HCV elimination in the canton of Bern by 2030., Methods: A preexisting Markov disease burden model was populated with data for Bern, and used to forecast the current and future prevalence of HCV, annual liver-related deaths (LRDs), and incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma and decompensated cirrhosis until 2030. Scenarios were developed to assess the current standard of care and potential long-term impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the HCV infected population. Additionally, potential scenarios for achieving the WHO 2030 targets and the SHS 2025 and 2030 targets (reduction of new cases of HCV, HCV-related mortality and viremic HCV cases) were identified., Results: In 2019, there were an estimated 4,600 (95% UI: 3,330-4,940) viremic infections in the canton of Bern and 57% (n = 2,600) of viremic cases were diagnosed. This modelling forecasted a 10% increase in LRDs (28 in 2020 to 31 in 2030) with the current standard of care and a 50% increase in LRDs in a scenario assuming long-term delays. To achieve the WHO and SHS targets, the canton of Bern needs to increase the annual number of patients diagnosed (from 90 in 2019 to 250 per year in 2022-2024 [WHO], or 500 per year in 2022-2025 [SHS]) and treated (from 130 in 2019 to 340 per year in 2022-2024 [WHO] or 670 per year in 2022-2025 [SHS])., Conclusions: The SHS goals and the WHO targets for HCV elimination can be achieved in the Swiss canton of Bern by 2030; however, not at the current pace of screening, linkage to care and treatment., Competing Interests: Olivier Schorr was a Master in Public Health university student at the time this work was completed and an employee of Gilead Sciences; This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

The interaction between the mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is essential for hepatocyte function. An increase in ER-mitochondria contacts (ERMCs) is associated with various metabolic diseases. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes, and its progressive form non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) can lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the role of ERMCs in the progression of NAFL to NASH is still unclear. We assessed whether ERMCs could correlate with NAFLD severity. We used a proximity ligation assay to measure the abundance of ERMCs in liver biopsies from patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD ( n = 48) and correlated the results with histological and metabolic syndrome (MetS) features. NAFLD patients were included according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then assigned to NAFL ( n = 9) and NASH ( n = 39) groups. ERMCs density could discriminate NASH from NAFL (sensitivity 61.5%, specificity 100%). ERMCs abundance correlated with hepatocellular ballooning. Moreover, the density of ERMCs increased with an increase in the number of MetS features. In conclusion, ERMCs increased from NAFL to NASH, in parallel with the number of MetS features, supporting a role for this interaction in the pathophysiology of NASH.

Background: MELD exceptions are designed to equipoise liver transplant waiting list survival. We aimed to analyze the impact of the MELD Upgrade rule and all other MELD exceptions on the liver transplant waiting list outcomes during 2012-2017 in Switzerland., Methods: We conducted a nationwide cohort study including all adult patients registered on the Swiss liver transplant waiting list between 2012 and 2017. Waiting list mortality and access to transplantation were analyzed, considering MELD exceptions as time-dependent covariates., Results: 730 patients were included. Patients with MELD Upgrade exceptions had a higher risk of dying while on the waiting list (OR 2.13; CI 95% 1.30-3.47) and also an increased likelihood of receiving a liver transplantation, when compared to patients without MELD exceptions. Patients with any type of MELD exceptions were more likely to be transplanted when compared to patients without MELD exceptions. The proportion of patients with MELD exceptions increased from 2012 to 2017 (44% vs 88%). Allocation MELD at the time of transplantation showed an annual increase (23 ± 8 points vs 32 ± 5 points, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Only patients with MELD Upgrade exceptions had the expected combination of higher waiting list mortality and quicker access to liver transplantation., (Copyright © 2021 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Objectives: Percutaneous liver biopsy is an essential diagnostic investigation in hepatology. Among complications, which are rare, bleeding is the most feared. Many patients scheduled for a liver biopsy are taking aspirin. Surprisingly no information is available in the literature on this frequent clinical situation. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) position paper on percutaneous liver biopsy does not specifically recommend stopping low dose aspirin prior to an elective percutaneous liver biopsy. The European Association for the Study of the Liver also remains unspecific without giving clear recommendation on stopping or not low dose aspirin before the procedure. The aim of this study is to document current practice concerning the management of patients scheduled for an elective percutaneous biopsy and taking low dose aspirin., Design: An online questionnaire was designed to gather data on current practice on the perioperative management of percutaneous liver biopsy and use of aspirin., Settings: The questionnaire was emailed to AASLD members in September 2018., Participants: Four hundred sixty six responses were collected., Results: Seventy eight percent postpone elective percutaneous liver biopsy if International Normalised Ratio is ≥1.5 or Quick ≤50%. Ninety five percent postpone biopsy if platelet count is ≤50,000 × 10 6 /L. Seventy five percent stop low dose aspirin, on average, 6 days prior to the percutaneous liver biopsy. This choice of management does not seem to be related to previous complications since 86% report not having experienced any bleeding in patients taking low dose aspirin. Nevertheless, this practice has logistic consequences since 61% of the respondents postponed a liver biopsy due to intake of low dose aspirin., Conclusions: Despite the lack of clear statement in guidelines and evidence supporting this practice, three quarters of physicians practicing in hepatology stop low dose aspirin before elective percutaneous liver biopsy., (© 2022 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.)

Background: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-activated transcription factors known to regulate glucose and fatty acid metabolism, inflammation, endothelial function and fibrosis. PPAR isoforms have been extensively studied in metabolic diseases, including type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Recent data extend the key role of PPARs to liver diseases coursing with vascular dysfunction, including nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)., Aim: This review summarises and discusses the pathobiological role of PPARs in cardiovascular diseases with a special focus on their impact and therapeutic potential in NAFLD and NASH., Results and Conclusions: PPARs may be attractive for the treatment of NASH due to their liver-specific effects but also because of their efficacy in improving cardiovascular outcomes, which may later impact liver disease. Assessment of cardiovascular disease in the context of NASH trials is, therefore, of the utmost importance, both from a safety and efficacy perspective., (© 2022 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis is becoming the most important aetiology for advanced liver disease. There has been important progress in the field in recent years and the complexity of the pathophysiology of NASH is better understood. Multiple non-invasive circulating and imaging biomarkers have been tested. The importance of lifestyle has been recognised and several drugs are being tested in clinical trials. This review addresses the challenges that healthcare professionals face in the management of NASH patients., Competing Interests: Competing interests: J-FD: Advisory committees : Abbvie, Alientis, Allergan, Axcella, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Enyo Pharma, Falk, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, HepaRegeniX, Intercept, Ipsen, Inventiva, Madrigal, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Trilliome DTx. Speaking and teaching : Bayer, Intercept, Genfit. Royalties : BMJ Journals, Springer, UpToDate. Quentin Anstee: Research Grant Funding: Abbvie, Allergan/Tobira, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, GlympseBio, Novartis Pharma AG, Pfizer. Active Research Collaborations (including research supported through the EU IMI2 LITMUS Consortium*). Abbvie, Antaros Medical*, Allergan/Tobira, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International*, Ellegaard Gottingen Minipigs AS*, Eli Lilly & Company*, Exalenz Bioscience*, Genfit SA*, GlaxoSmithKline, HistoIndex, Intercept Pharma Europe*, iXscient*, Nordic Bioscience*, Novartis Pharma AG*, Novo Nordisk A/S*, One Way Liver Genomics SL*, Perspectum Diagnostics*, Pfizer.*, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland*, SomaLogic*, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International SA*. Consultancy (undertaken on behalf of Newcastle University): Abbott Laboratories, Acuitas Medical, Allergan/Tobira, E3Bio, EcoR1, Eli Lilly & Company, Galmed, Genfit SA, Gilead, Grunthal, HistoIndex, Imperial Innovations, Intercept Pharma Europe, Inventiva, IQVIA, Janssen, Madrigal, MedImmune, NewGene, NGMBio, Novartis, Novo Nordisk A/S, Pfizer, Poxel, Raptor Pharma, Servier, Viking. Speaker: Abbott Laboratories, Allergan/Tobira, BMS, Clinical Care Options, Falk, Genfit SA, Gilead, Kenes. Elisabetta Bugianesi: Consultant: Gilead Sciences, Intercept, BMS, NovoNordisk, Pfeizer, Inventiva, Genfit, Lilly, MSD. Stephen Harrison: Scientific advisor or consultant for Akero, Alentis, Altimmune, Arrowhead, Axcella, Cirius, Cymabay, Echosens, Fibronostics, Forest Labs, Galectin, Genfit, Gilead,Hepagene, Hepion, HistoIndex, Intercept, Madrigal, Medpace, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Poxel, Sagimet, Terns, Viking, 89 Bio. Stock options: Akero, Cirius, Galectin, Genfit, Hepion, HistoIndex, PathAI, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea. Grant/Research support: Akero, Axcella, BMS, Cirius, CiVi Biopharma, Conatus, Cymabay, Enyo, Galectin, Genentech, Genfit, Gilead, Hepion, Hightide, Intercept, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Northsea, Pfizer, Sagimet, Viking. Rohit Loomba: Research supported by PI, R01DK106419, NIDDK, NIH; PI, R01DK121378, NIDDK, NIH; PI, R01 DK124318, NIDDK, NIH; PI, U01, NASH-CRN, NIDDK, NIH; PI, U01, AA029019, NIAAA, NIH; Project PI, P01HL147835, NHLBI; Investigator Initiated Research Grant, Astrazeneca; Investigator initiated Research Grant, Gilead Inc. Investigator initiated Research grant, Janssen Inc. Valérie Paradis: Consultant: Inventiva; Teaching: Novartis. Vincent Wong: Consultancy: 3V-BIO, AbbVie, Allergan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Gilead Sciences, Inventiva, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, ProSciento, Sagimet Biosciences, TARGET PharmaSolutions, Terns. Lectures: Abbott, AbbVie, Echosens, Gilead Sciences, Novo Nordisk. Research grants: Gilead Sciences Stock: Co-founder of Illuminatio Medical Technology., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background & Aims: Obesity-associated inflammation is a key player in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, the role of macrophage scavenger receptor 1 (MSR1, CD204) remains incompletely understood., Methods: A total of 170 NAFLD liver biopsies were processed for transcriptomic analysis and correlated with clinicopathological features. Msr1 -/- and wild-type mice were subjected to a 16-week high-fat and high-cholesterol diet. Mice and ex vivo human liver slices were treated with a monoclonal antibody against MSR1. Genetic susceptibility was assessed using genome-wide association study data from 1,483 patients with NAFLD and 430,101 participants of the UK Biobank., Results: MSR1 expression was associated with the occurrence of hepatic lipid-laden foamy macrophages and correlated with the degree of steatosis and steatohepatitis in patients with NAFLD. Mice lacking Msr1 were protected against diet-induced metabolic disorder, showing fewer hepatic foamy macrophages, less hepatic inflammation, improved dyslipidaemia and glucose tolerance, and altered hepatic lipid metabolism. Upon induction by saturated fatty acids, MSR1 induced a pro-inflammatory response via the JNK signalling pathway. In vitro blockade of the receptor prevented the accumulation of lipids in primary macrophages which inhibited the switch towards a pro-inflammatory phenotype and the release of cytokines such as TNF-ɑ. Targeting MSR1 using monoclonal antibody therapy in an obesity-associated NAFLD mouse model and human liver slices resulted in the prevention of foamy macrophage formation and inflammation. Moreover, we identified that rs41505344, a polymorphism in the upstream transcriptional region of MSR1, was associated with altered serum triglycerides and aspartate aminotransferase levels in a cohort of over 400,000 patients., Conclusions: Taken together, our data suggest that MSR1 plays a critical role in lipid-induced inflammation and could thus be a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of NAFLD., Lay Summary: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a chronic disease primarily caused by excessive consumption of fat and sugar combined with a lack of exercise or a sedentary lifestyle. Herein, we show that the macrophage scavenger receptor MSR1, an innate immune receptor, mediates lipid uptake and accumulation in Kupffer cells, resulting in liver inflammation and thereby promoting the progression of NAFLD in humans and mice., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors have no potential conflicts (financial, professional or personal) directly relevant to the manuscript. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR), ligand-activated transcription factors of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, have been identified as key metabolic regulators in the liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue, among others. As a leading cause of liver disease worldwide, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cause a significant burden worldwide and therapeutic strategies are needed. This review provides an overview of the evidence on PPAR-targeted treatment of NAFLD and NASH in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We considered current evidence from clinical trials and observational studies as well as the impact of treatment on comorbid metabolic conditions such as obesity, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disease. Future areas of research, such as possible sexually dimorphic effects of PPAR-targeted therapies, are briefly reviewed.

Background and Objectives: Spinal cord sarcoidosis is a rare manifestation of sarcoidosis with a consequent risk of neurologic sequelae for the patient. We investigated prognostic factors and efficacy of immunosuppressive treatments in a longitudinal cohort., Methods: We retrospectively studied patients with spinal cord sarcoidosis followed between 1995 and 2021 in 7 centers in France. Patients with definite, probable, or possible spinal cord sarcoidosis according to the Neurosarcoidosis Consortium Consensus Group criteria and with spinal cord involvement confirmed by MRI were included. We analyzed relapse or progression rate with a Poisson model, initial Rankin score with a linear model, and change in the Rankin score during follow-up with a logistic model., Results: A total of 97 patients were followed for a median of 7.8 years. Overall mean relapse or progression rate was 0.17 per person-year and decreased over time. At last visit, 46 (47.4%) patients had a loss of autonomy (Rankin score ≥2). The main prognostic factors significantly associated with relapse or progression rate were gadolinium enhancement (relative rate [95% CI] 0.61 [0.4, 0.95]) or meningeal involvement (relative rate [95% CI] 2.05 [1.31, 3.19]) on spinal cord MRI and cell count (relative rate [95% CI] per 1 log increase 1.16 [1.01, 1.33]) on CSF analysis. Relapse or progression rate was not significantly associated with initial Rankin score or Expanded Disability Status Scale. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) antagonists significantly decreased relapse or progression rate compared with corticosteroids alone (relative rate [95% CI] 0.33 [0.11, 0.98]). Azathioprine was significantly less effective than methotrexate on relapse or progression rate (relative rate [95% CI] 2.83 [1.04, 7.75]) and change in Rankin score (mean difference [95% CI] 0.65 [0.23, 1.08])., Discussion: Regarding the relapse or progression rate, meningeal localization of sarcoidosis was associated with a worse prognosis, TNF-α antagonists resulted in a significant decrease compared to corticosteroids alone, and methotrexate was more effective than azathioprine., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that in individuals with spinal cord neurosarcoidosis, TNF-α antagonists were associated with decreased relapse or progression rate compared to corticosteroids alone, but other therapies showed no significant benefit., (© 2022 American Academy of Neurology.)

Polarizing opinions have recently arisen in hepatology on the name and redefinition of fatty liver disease associated with metabolic dysfunction. In spite of growing and robust evidence of the superior utility of the term metabolic (dysfunction) associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) definition for clinical and academic practice, controversy abounds. It should therefore come, as no surprise that the most common arguments used in contrarian op-eds is that there are no consensus on any name change. In this context, we suggest that discourse on an accurate understanding of what scientific consensus means, the various methods of achieving consensus, as well as other alternative models for reaching agreement is pivotal for the field. In this opinion piece, we provide an overview of these aspects as it applies to the case of fatty liver disease. We provide evidence that consensus on a change from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to MAFLD has already been achieved. We believe that the time has come for redirecting stakeholder focus and energy on capitalizing on the momentum generated by the debate to improve the lives of people at its centre, our patients., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S . Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: Immunosuppressive agents are known to interfere with T and/or B lymphocytes, which are required to mount an adequate serologic response. Therefore, we aim to investigate the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in liver transplant (LT) recipients after COVID-19., Design: Prospective multicentre case-control study, analysing antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein, spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 and their neutralising activity in LT recipients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19-LT) compared with immunocompetent patients (COVID-19-immunocompetent) and LT recipients without COVID-19 symptoms (non-COVID-19-LT)., Results: Overall, 35 LT recipients were included in the COVID-19-LT cohort. 35 and 70 subjects fulfilling the matching criteria were assigned to the COVID-19-immunocompetent and non-COVID-19-LT cohorts, respectively. We showed that LT recipients, despite immunosuppression and less symptoms, mounted a detectable antinucleocapsid antibody titre in 80% of the cases, although significantly lower compared with the COVID-19-immunocompetent cohort (3.73 vs 7.36 index level, p<0.001). When analysing anti-S antibody response, no difference in positivity rate was found between the COVID-19-LT and COVID-19-immunocompetent cohorts (97.1% vs 100%, p=0.314). Functional antibody testing showed neutralising activity in 82.9% of LT recipients (vs 100% in COVID-19-immunocompetent cohort, p=0.024)., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the humoral response of LT recipients is only slightly lower than expected, compared with COVID-19 immunocompetent controls. Testing for anti-S antibodies alone can lead to an overestimation of the neutralising ability in LT recipients. Altogether, routine antibody testing against separate SARS-CoV-2 antigens and functional testing show that the far majority of LT patients are capable of mounting an adequate antibody response with neutralising ability., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Aims: Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the main cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). An HCC screening initiative was piloted in an established cohort of individuals co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HBV on antiretroviral therapy (ART) at two outpatient clinics in Lusaka, Zambia., Methods: All patients underwent abdominal ultrasound (AUS) and transient elastography., Results: Among 279 patients co-infected with HIV/HBV, 165 (59.1%) were men, median age was 34 years [interquartile range (IQR) 28-39 years] and median CD4 count was 246 cells/µL (IQR 112-355 cells/µL) at ART initiation. While 102 (55.7%) individuals had elevated transaminases, 114 (59.7%) had HBV levels >2000 IU/mL and 59 (24.6%) had significant fibrosis. At their first AUS measurement, 75 (26.9%) participants had hepatomegaly and 69 (24.7%) had periportal fibrosis. Five patients had a liver lesion >1 cm, an indication for confirmatory imaging., Conclusions: In one of the first HCC screening initiatives in SSA, 2% of patients co-infected with HIV/HBV had significant liver lesions, and one-quarter had findings suggestive of schistosomiasis-induced liver damage., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The benefit of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) against HCV following successful treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. This meta-analysis of individual patient data assessed HCC recurrence risk following DAA administration., Design: We pooled the data of 977 consecutive patients from 21 studies of HCV-related cirrhosis and HCC, who achieved complete radiological response after surgical/locoregional treatments and received DAAs (DAA group). Recurrence or death risk was expressed as HCC recurrence or death per 100 person-years (100PY). Propensity score-matched patients from the ITA.LI.CA. cohort (n=328) served as DAA-unexposed controls (no-DAA group). Risk factors for HCC recurrence were identified using random-effects Poisson., Results: Recurrence rate and death risk per 100PY in DAA-treated patients were 20 (95% CI 13.9 to 29.8, I 2 =74.6%) and 5.7 (2.5 to 15.3, I 2 =54.3), respectively. Predictive factors for recurrence were alpha-fetoprotein logarithm (relative risk (RR)=1.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.19; p=0.01, per 1 log of ng/mL), HCC recurrence history pre-DAA initiation (RR=1.11, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.16; p<0.001), performance status (2 vs 0, RR=4.35, 95% CI 1.54 to 11.11; 2 vs 1, RR=3.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 11.11; p=0.01) and tumour burden pre-HCC treatment (multifocal vs solitary nodule, RR=1.75, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.43; p<0.001). No significant difference was observed in RR between the DAA-exposed and DAA-unexposed groups in propensity score-matched patients (RR=0.64, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.1; p=0.1)., Conclusion: Effects of DAA exposure on HCC recurrence risk remain inconclusive. Active clinical and radiological follow-up of patients with HCC after HCV eradication with DAA is justified., Competing Interests: Competing interests: VS: travel funding from Bayer. FT: DSMB fees from Basilea Pharmaceutica International and ROVI; educational fees from Janssen and Ferrer. PN: consults for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Gilead, Ipsen, Roche. He received grants from AbbVie and BMS. ZM: speaker fees and consultancy for Gilead and AbbVie. RT: personal fees from Merk Sharp & Dorme, Giliad Sciences and AbbVie GK. TM: personal fees from Merk Sharp & Dorme, Giliad Sciences and AbbVie GK. XF: consultancy fees for AbbVie and Gilead Sciences. HT: speaker fees from AbbVie, Gildead, MSD and Bayer. SB: consultancy fees and educational grants from: Gilead Sciences, MSD, Intercept. ED: advisory board from AbbVie; speaking and teaching from Gilead, MSD, AbbVie. M-LY: research grant from Abbott, BMS, Gilead and Merck; consultant of AbbVie, Abbott, BMS, Gilead, Merck and Roche; speaker of AbbVie, Abbott, BMS, Gilead and Merck. YA: donation-funded department funded by Toray Industries Inc., Gilead Sciences, AbbVie GK and Fuji Rebio Inc. AS: has received research funding from AbbVie and Gilead. He has served as a consultant for Wako Diagnostics, Glycotest, Exact Sciences, Roche, GRAIL, Genentech, Bayer, Eisai, Exelixis, AstraZeneca, BMS and TARGET Pharmasolutions. MK: lecture fees from Abott and AstraZeneca. J-FD: advisory committees: AbbVie, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Falk, Genfit, Genkyotex, Gilead Sciences, HepaRegenix, Intercept, Lilly, Merck, Novartis. Speaking and teaching: Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Intercept, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Roche. NM: research founding, lecture fees, advisory committees and travel grants from MSD. Lecture fees, advisory committees and travel grants from AbbVie and Gilead. SP: consulting and lecturing fees from Janssen, Gilead, MSD, AbbVie, Biotest, Shinogui, Viiv and grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Roche and MSD, without relation to this manuscript. JC: grants and research support from Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, MSD, Shionogi and Intercept Pharmaceuticals (all outside the submitted work). Is a speaker for Gilead Sciences and AbbVie. JLC: reports grant support and/or consultancy and lecture fees from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen and MSD. RV: research grant from AbbVie. GS: consultancy fees and lecture fees from Gilead and AbbVie. FPR: lecture fees AbbVie, Gilead, MSD, Biotest; travel funds AbbVie, Biotest, Kedrion; research funds AbbVie, Gilead, MSD. RB: research grants from MSD, AbbVie and Gilead. JR: educational grants from Amgen, Grüenenthal Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim España, Janssen-Cilag, Ferrer International, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche Farma. FT: consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai and Sirtex. Lecture fees from AlfaSigma and Bayer. Research grants from Bayer. CC: consultancy fees from Bayer, EISAI, MSD, Gilead, ABV. JB: consultancy fees from Arqule, Bayer, Novartis, BMS, BTG-Biocompatibles, Eisai, Kowa, Terumo, Gilead, Bio-Alliance/Onxeo, Roche, AbbVie, Merck, Sirtex, Ipsen, Astra-Medimmune, Incyte, Quirem, Adaptimmune, Lilly, Basilea, Nerviano. Research grants from Bayer and BTG. Educational grants from Bayer and BTG. Lecture fees from Bayer, BTG-Biocompatibles, Eisai, Terumo, Sirtex, Ipsen. GC: consultancy fees from Bayer, Ipsen. MR: consultancy fees from Bayer, BMS, Roche, Ipsen, AstraZeneca and Lilly. Lecture fees from Bayer, BMS, Gilead, Lilly and Roche. Research grants from Bayer and Ipsen., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background & Aims: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic, progressive fibrotic liver disease that can lead to cirrhosis. While liver biopsy is considered the reference standard for the histologic diagnosis of NASH and staging of fibrosis, its use in clinical practice is limited. Non-invasive tests (NITs) are increasingly being used to identify and stage liver fibrosis in patients with NASH, and several can assess liver-related outcomes. We report changes in various NITs in patients treated with obeticholic acid (OCA) or placebo in the phase III REGENERATE study., Methods: Patients with NASH and fibrosis stage F2 or F3 (n = 931) were randomized (1:1:1) to receive placebo, OCA 10 mg, or OCA 25 mg once daily. Various NITs based on clinical chemistry and/or imaging were evaluated at baseline and throughout the study., Results: Rapid, sustained reductions from baseline in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and gamma-glutamyltransferase levels, as well as in Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), FibroTest, FibroMeter, and FibroScan-AST scores were observed in OCA-treated vs. placebo-treated patients. Reduction in liver stiffness by vibration-controlled transient elastography was observed in the OCA 25 mg group vs. the placebo group at Month 18. NIT changes were associated with shifts in histologic fibrosis stage. The greatest improvements were observed in patients with ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement; however, improvements in ALT, AST, FIB-4, and FibroTest were also observed in OCA-treated patients whose histologic fibrosis remained stable., Conclusions: Based on the REGENERATE Month 18 interim analysis, rapid and sustained improvements in various NITs were observed with OCA treatment. Dynamic changes in selected NITs separated histologic responders from non-responders. These results suggest that NITs may be useful in assessing histologic response to OCA therapy. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Number: NCT02548351 LAY SUMMARY: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic, progressive liver disease that can lead to cirrhosis. To diagnose and assess liver fibrosis (scarring) in patients with NASH, non-invasive tests (NITs) are increasingly being used rather than liver biopsy, which is invasive, expensive, and can be risky. In the REGENERATE study, which is evaluating the effects of obeticholic acid vs. placebo in patients with NASH, various NITs were also evaluated. This analysis shows that improvements in levels of certain blood components, as well as favorable results of ultrasound imaging and proprietary tests of liver function, were associated with improvements in liver fibrosis after treatment with obeticholic acid, suggesting that NITs may be useful alternatives to liver biopsy in assessing NASH patients' response to therapy., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest MR was a consultant over the past 36 months for Alnylam, Amgen, AMRA, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Centara, Coherus, Enanta, Galecto, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Madrigal, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Fractyl, Gelesis, Siemens, Thetis, Terns, Rivus, 3vbio (Sagimet), 89Bio, and Novartis. She currently has no active consulting contracts. J-FD reports advisory committee participation for AbbVie, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Falk, Genfit, Genkyotex, Gilead Sciences, HepaRegeniX, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly, Merck, Novartis; speaking and teaching fees from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Roche. QMA reports support from Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in relation to the present study; research funds as Coordinator of the EU IMI-2 LITMUS consortium, which is funded by the EU Horizon 2020 programme and EFPIA. This multi-stakeholder consortium includes industry partners, in addition, Allergan/Tobira, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Glympse Bio, Novartis Pharma AG, Pfizer Ltd; royalties or licenses from Elsevier Ltd; consulting fees from 89Bio, Allergan/Tobira, Altimmune, AstraZeneca, Axcella, Blade, BMS, BNN Cardio, Cirius, CymaBay, EcoR1, E3Bio, Eli Lilly & Company Ltd., Galmed, Genentech, Genfit SA, Gilead, Grunthal, HistoIndex, Indalo, Intercept Pharma Europe Ltd., Inventiva, IQVIA, Janssen, Madrigal, MedImmune, Medpace, Metacrine, NGMBio, North Sea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk A/S, PathAI, Pfizer Ltd., Poxel, ProSciento, Raptor Pharma, Roche, Servier, Terns, The Medicines Company, Viking Therapeutics; honoraria from Abbott Laboratories, Allergan/Tobira, BMS, Clinical Care Options, Falk, Fishawack, Genfit SA, Gilead, Integritas Communications, Kenes, Medscape; member of advisory board for Medpace (NorthSea Therapeutics). ZG has no conflicts to report. ZY reports consulting fees and research grants from Gilead Sciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., BMS, Novo Nordisk, Viking, Terns, Siemens, Quest, AbbVie, Madrigal, Merck, and Novartis. SAH reports consulting/advisory, stock ownership/equity from Akero, Galectin, Genfit, Madrigal, Metacrine, Histoindex and NGM Bio; grants from Axcella, Cirius, CymaBay, Galectin, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead, HighTide, Madrigal, NGM, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Second Genome; consulting/advisory for Alentis, Axcella, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, CiVi, CLDF, Corcept, Echosens, , Gilead, HighTide, Medpace, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Perspectum, Prometric, Viking, Hepagene, Hepion, and Terns. RL reports research grants from Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer -Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galectin Therapeutics, Galmed Pharmaceuticals, Genfit, Gilead, Inventiva, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Merck, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Siemens; consulting fees from Anylam/Regeneron, Amgen, Ar Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CohBar, Eli Lilly, Galmed, Gilead, Glympse Bio, Inipharm, Intercept, Ionis, Janssen Inc., Madrigal, Metacrine, Inc., NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sagimet, 89Bio, Viking Therapeutics; advisory committee participation for Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; co-founder of Liponexus, Inc. AJS is President of Sanyal Biotechnology; he reports stock options in Sanyal Bio, Exhalenz, Akarna, GenFit, Hemoshear, Durect, Indalo, Tiziana, Rivus; paid consultant to 89Bio, Albireo, Amgen, Ardelyx, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bird Rock, Bristol-Myers, Conatus, Covance, Echosens-Sandhill, ENYO, Genentech, General Electric, Genfit, Gilead, Hemoshear, HistoIndex, Inventiva, Janssen, Lilly, Madrigal, Mallinckrodt, Merck, NGM Bio, Nimbus, NorthSea, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Owl, PathAI, Perspectum, Pfizer, Poxel, Prosciento, Regeneron, Rivus, Roche, Salix, Sanofi, Second Genome, Servier, Siemens, Takeda, Terns, Tiziana, Zydus; unpaid consultant to Immuron, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Galectin, Sequana, Fractyl; Durect, Indalo, Allergan, Chemomab, Affimune, Teva, BASF, AMRA, Perspectum, Biocellvia; advisory board member for Immuron; royalties from Elsevier and UptoDate; grant support from Gilead, Mallinckrodt, Salix, Novartis, Galectin, Bristol-Myers, Sequana; receipt of equipment from Echosens-Sandhill; ongoing research collaboration with Echosens-Sandhill, Owl, Second Genome, Siemens; his institution has received grant support from Conatus, Gilead, Mallinckrodt, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Bristol-Myers, Merck, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Fractyl, Madrigal, Inventiva, Covance; his institution has received fees from AstraZeneca. MB reports employment at and stock ownership in Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at the time of the study. AT reports employment at and stock ownership in Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. MN reports employment at and stock ownership in Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at the time of the study. RS reports employment at and stock ownership in Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at the time of the study. TG reports employment at and stock ownership in Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at the time of the study. AV reports employment at Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at the time of the study. VR reports consulting fees from Galmed, Genfit, Madrigal, NGM, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Theratechnologies, Terns; advisory committee participation for Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Switzerland has made strides towards hepatitis C virus elimination, but as of 2019, elimination was not guaranteed. However, political interest in viral hepatitis has been increasing. We sought to develop a better understanding of Switzerland's progress towards HCV elimination and the profile of remaining HCV-RNA-positive patients., Methods: A previously described Markov model was updated with recent diagnosis and treatment data and run to generate new forecasts for HCV disease burden. Two scenarios were developed to evaluate HCV morbidity and mortality under the status quo and a scenario that achieves the Swiss Hepatitis Strategy Elimination targets. Next, an analysis was conducted to identify population segments bearing a high burden of disease, where future elimination efforts could be directed., Results: At the beginning of 2020, an estimated 32 100 viremic infections remained in Switzerland (0.37% viremic prevalence). Adult (≥18 years of age) permanent residents born abroad represented the largest subpopulation, accounting for 56% of HCV infections. Thirteen countries accounted for ≥60% of viremic infections amongst permanent residents born abroad, with most people currently residing in Zurich, Vaud, Geneva, Bern, Aargau and Ticino. Amongst Swiss-born HCV-RNA-positive persons, two-thirds had a history of IDU, corresponding to 33% of total infections., Conclusions: In Switzerland, extra efforts for diagnosis and linkage to care are warranted in foreign-born populations and people with a history of drug use. Population-level measures (eg increasing the number of providers, increase screening) can identify patients who may have otherwise fallen through the gaps or avoided care because of stigma., (© 2021 The Authors. Liver International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background & Aims: Immunotherapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab represents the new standard of care in systemic front-line treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, biomarkers that predict treatment success and survival remain an unmet need., Methods: Patients with HCC put on PD-(L)1-based immunotherapy were included in a training set (n = 190; 6 European centers) and a validation set (n = 102; 8 European centers). We investigated the prognostic value of baseline variables on overall survival using a Cox model in the training set and developed the easily applicable CRAFITY (CRP and AFP in ImmunoTherapY) score. The score was validated in the independent, external cohort, and evaluated in a cohort of patients treated with sorafenib (n = 204)., Results: Baseline serum alpha-fetoprotein ≥100 ng/ml (hazard ratio [HR] 1.7; p = 0.007) and C-reactive protein ≥1 mg/dl (HR, 1.7; p = 0.007) were identified as independent prognostic factors in multivariable analysis and were used to develop the CRAFITY score. Patients who fulfilled no criterion (0 points; CRAFITY-low) had the longest median overall survival (27.6 (95% CI 19.5-35.8) months), followed by those fulfilling 1 criterion (1 point; CRAFITY-intermediate; 11.3 (95% CI 8.0-14.6) months), and patients meeting both criteria (2 points; CRAFITY-high; 6.4 (95% CI 4.8-8.1) months; p <0.001). Additionally, best radiological response (complete response/partial response/stable disease/progressive disease) was significantly better in patients with lower CRAFITY score (CRAFITY-low: 9%/20%/52%/20% vs. CRAFITY-intermediate: 3%/25%/36%/36% vs. CRAFITY-high: 2%/15%/22%/61%; p = 0.003). These results were confirmed in the independent validation set and in different subgroups, including Child-Pugh A and B, performance status 0 and ≥1, and first-line and later lines. In the sorafenib cohort, CRAFITY was associated with survival, but not radiological response., Conclusions: The CRAFITY score is associated with survival and radiological response in patients receiving PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. The score may help with patient counseling but requires prospective validation., Lay Summary: The immunotherapy-based regimen of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab represents the new standard of care in systemic first-line therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Biomarkers to predict treatment outcome are an unmet need in patients undergoing immunotherapy for HCC. We developed and externally validated a score that predicts outcome in patients with HCC undergoing immunotherapy with immune checkpoint blockers., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest B.S. received travel support from AbbVie, Ipsen and Gilead. K.P. nothing to disclose. M.K. received honoraria from BMS and AstraZeneca as consultant and is an investigator for AstraZeneca. F.H. received travel support from Bayer, Abbvie, and Gilead. F.F. received travel support from Abbvie and Novartis, and speaker fees from Abbvie and MSD. O.W. served as consultant for Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Servier, and Shire. He served as a speaker for Abbvie, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Falk, Ipsen, Novartis, Roche, and Shire. He received travel support from Abbvie, BMS, Ipsen, Novartis, and Servier. V.H. has nothing to disclose. K.S. Served as consultant for Ipsen and Bayer, and conducts studies for Bayer, Roche, Lilly, MSD, and BMS. J.v.F. has received advisory board fees from Roche. T.W.F. has nothing to disclose. M.S. has nothing to disclose. H.H. received compensations as a member of a scientific advisory board of Lilly. K.S. has nothing to disclose. S.S. has nothing to disclose. P.R. has nothing to disclose. A.R.S. has served at advisory boards and received consulting honoraria from AMGEN, AAA, Bayer, BMS, IPSEN, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Servier. J.C.M. has received consulting honoraria from Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Gilead, Incyte, Intercept, MSD, Sanofi, Vifor for work performed outside the current study. N.N.R. has nothing to disclose. F.K. received speakers' fees from Bayer, Ipsen, MSD, Eisai, Shire, Sirtex and has received travel grants from Eisai, Janssen, Ipsen and Novartis. D.T.W. served as speaker/expert testimony for AstraZeneca, Eisai, BMS, Celgene, Incyte, Ipsen, Falk, Novartis, Roche Pharma AG, Servier, Shire Baxelta, and Sirtex; he received travel support from Bayer Health Pharma, Celgene, Ipsen, Novartis, and SIRTEX, and research grants/funding from Servier. M.P.E. received consulting honoraria from BMS and MSD. A.T. received consulting honoraria and /or lecture fees from Bayer, IPSEN, Lilly, BMS, Eisai Novartis, Roche, Intercept, Falk, AbbVie, and Gilead. He received and travel grants from IPSEN, AbbVie, and Gilead. He is an investigator for IPSEN and GILEAD. S.D.D. received consulting honoraria from Amgen, Bayer, BMS, IPSEN, Lilly, Merck, BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Servier, and travel grants from Amgen, BMS, IPSEN, Roche, and Servier. D.J.P. received lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare, Bayer Healthcare, Falk, BMS, EISAI and Roche; travel expenses from BMS, MSD and Bayer Healthcare; consulting fees for Mina Therapeutics, EISAI, H3B, Roche, Astra Zeneca, and DaVolterra; research funding (to institution) from MSD, BMS. T.P. received consulting fees from IQVIA and Bayer; and institutional research funding from Lilly, Roche, Bayer. T.M. has nothing to disclose. L.B. has nothing to disclose. C.M. has nothing to disclose. M.M. served as a speaker and/or consultant and/or advisory board member for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Collective Acumen, Gilead, and W. L. Gore & Associates and received travel support from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Gilead. T.R. received speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, W.L. Gore and MSD, grant support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Gilead, Guerbet, Abbvie, Phenex Pharmaceuticals, Philips, W.L. Gore, and MSD, served as a consultant for Abbvie, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, Intercept and MSD and received travel support from Gilead, Roche, MSD, and Gore. M.T. received speaker fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Falk Foundation, Gilead, Intercept and Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD); advisory board fees from Abbvie, Albireo, Boehringer Ingelheim, BiomX, Falk Pharma GmbH, GENFIT, Gilead, Intercept, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Phenex, Regulus and Shire; travel grants from AbbVie, Falk, Gilead, and Intercept; and research grants from Albireo, CymaBay, Falk, Gilead, Intercept, MSD, and Takeda. He is also coinventor of patents on the medical use of norUDCA filed by the Medical University of Graz. N.P. received consulting fees from Amgen, Merck Serono, Servier; lectures fees from AbbVie, Gilead, Lilly; travel fees from Amgen, ArQule; and institutional research funding from Basilea, Merck Serono, Servier. L.R. has received consulting fees from Amgen, ArQule, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, Exelixis, Genenta, Hengrui, Incyte, Ipsen, IQVIA, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Sanofi, Zymeworks; lectures fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Eisai, Gilead, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi; travel expenses from Ipsen; and institutional research funding from Agios, ARMO BioSciences, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Eisai, Exelixis, Fibrogen, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Zymeworks. M.B. received compensations as a member of scientific advisory boards of Bayer, Bristol–Meyers Squibb, EISAI, IPSEN, and MSD. J.T. served as consultant for Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Ipsen, and Roche, received travel support from BMS and Ipsen, and speaking fees from Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Ipsen, and Roche. He is also an investigator for Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Ipsen, and Roche. A.W. received compensations as a member of scientific advisory boards for BMS, Wako, Sanofi and. He served as a speaker for Leo Pharma, Eisai, Ipsen and Roche and received travel support from Merck and Servier. H.W. served as speaker for Bayer, Eisai, Ipsen, and Roche, and as a consultant for Bayer, Eisai, Lilly, BMS, Roche, and Ipsen. He conducts studies for Bayer, Roche, Lilly, MSD, and BMS. J.F.D. received compensations as a member of scientific advisory boards of Abbvie, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Falk, Galapagos, Genfit, Genkyotex, Gilead Sciences, HepaRegenix, Intercept, Lilly, Merck, and Novartis. M.P.R. is advisor/consultant for Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, and Roche; he served as a speaker for Bayer, Eisai, Ipsen, Lilly, and Roche; he is an investigator for Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Exelixis, Lilly, and Roche. A.V. served as consultant for Roche, Bayer, Lilly, BMS, Eisai, and Ipsen, and received speaking fees form Roche, Bayer, Lilly, BMS, Eisai, and Ipsen. He is also an investigator for Roche, Bayer, Lilly, BMS, Eisai, and Ipsen. M.P. is an investigator for Bayer, BMS, Lilly, and Roche, he received speaker honoraria from Bayer, BMS, Eisai, and MSD, he is a consultant for Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, Eisai, Lilly, Roche, and MSD, and he received travel support from Bayer, BMS, and Roche. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the impact of the severity of steatosis and inflammatory activity on the accuracy of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography (TE) and by two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in staging liver fibrosis is still debated and scarce. We aimed to focus on this aspect., Methods: We prospectively studied 104 patients requiring biopsy for the assessment of NAFLD. We used ordinary least squares regression to test for differences in the association between fibrosis and LSM by TE and 2D-SWE when other factors (steatosis and inflammatory activity) are considered., Results: Among 104 patients, 102 had reliable LSM by TE, and 88 had valid LSM by 2D-SWE. The association between fibrosis based on histology and LSM was significantly stronger when 2D-SWE assessed LSM compared to TE (Spearman's correlation coefficient of .71; P < .001 vs .51, P < .001; Z = 2.21, P = .027). Inflammatory activity was an independent predictor of LSM by TE but not of LSM by 2D-SWE. After controlling for fibrosis, age, sex and body mass index, the inflammatory activity and the interaction between inflammatory activity and fibrosis independently explained 11% and 13% of variance in LSM by TE respectively. Steatosis did not affect the association of fibrosis and LSM by either method., Conclusion: Inflammatory activity on histology significantly affects LSM by TE, but not LSM by 2D-SWE in NAFLD. LSM by 2D-SWE reflects liver fibrosis more accurately than LSM by TE. Furthermore, the severity of steatosis on histology did not influence the association of LSM and fibrosis by either elastography method., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The time for battling cancer has never been more suitable than nowadays and fortunately against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) we do have a far-reaching arsenal. Moreover, because liver cancer comprises a plethora of stages-from very early to advanced disease and with many treatment options-from surgery to immunotherapy trials-it leaves the clinician a wide range of options. The scope of our review is to throw light on combination treatments that seem to be beyond guidelines and to highlight these using evidence-based analysis of the most frequently used combination therapies, discussing their advantages and flaws in comparison to the current standard of care. One particular combination therapy seems to be in the forefront: Transarterial chemoembolization plus ablation for medium-size non-resectable HCC (3-5 cm), which is currently at the frontier between Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification A and B. Not only does it improve the outcome in contrast to each individual therapy, but it also seems to have similar results to surgery. Also, the abundance of immune checkpoint inhibitors that have appeared lately in clinical trials are bringing promising results against HCC. Although the path of combination therapies in HCC is still filled with uncertainty and caveats, in the following years the hepatology and oncology fields could witness an HCC guideline revolution., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: Jean-François Dufour: Advisory committees: Abbvie, Bayer, BMS, Falk, Genfit, Genkyotex, Gilead Science, HepaRegenix, Intercept, Lilly, Merck, Novartis. Speaking and teaching: Abbvie, Bayer, BMS, Genfit, Gilead Science, Novartis., (©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common liver diseases worldwide and is often associated with aspects of metabolic syndrome. Despite its prevalence and the importance of early diagnosis, there is a lack of robustly validated biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of disease progression in response to a given treatment. In this Review, we provide an overview of the contribution of metabolomics and lipidomics in clinical studies to identify biomarkers associated with NAFLD and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). In addition, we highlight the key metabolic pathways in NAFLD and NASH that have been identified by metabolomics and lipidomics approaches and could potentially be used as biomarkers for non-invasive diagnostic tests. Overall, the studies demonstrated alterations in amino acid metabolism and several aspects of lipid metabolism including circulating fatty acids, triglycerides, phospholipids and bile acids. Although we report several studies that identified potential biomarkers, few have been validated., (© 2021. Springer Nature Limited.)

Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

In many countries worldwide, the burden of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is increasing. Preventive strategies are needed to counteract this trend. In this review, we provide an overview of the evidence on preventive strategies in NAFLD-associated HCC. We consider the impact of lifestyle factors such as weight loss, physical activity, smoking, dietary patterns and food items, including coffee and alcohol, on both HCC and NAFLD/NASH. Furthermore, evidence on chemopreventive treatments, including aspirin, antidiabetic treatments and statins is summarised. The role of adjuvant therapies for tertiary prevention of HCC is briefly reviewed., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors have no potential conflicts (financial, professional, or personal) that are relevant to the manuscript to disclose. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The microRNA 21 (miR-21) is upregulated in almost all known human cancers and is considered a highly potent oncogene and potential therapeutic target for cancer treatment. In the liver, miR-21 was reported to promote hepatic steatosis and inflammation, but whether miR-21 also drives hepatocarcinogenesis remains poorly investigated in vivo. Here we show using both carcinogen (Diethylnitrosamine, DEN) or genetically (PTEN deficiency)-induced mouse models of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), total or hepatocyte-specific genetic deletion of this microRNA fosters HCC development-contrasting the expected oncogenic role of miR-21. Gene and protein expression analyses of mouse liver tissues further indicate that total or hepatocyte-specific miR-21 deficiency is associated with an increased expression of oncogenes such as Cdc25a , subtle deregulations of the MAPK, HiPPO, and STAT3 signaling pathways, as well as alterations of the inflammatory/immune anti-tumoral responses in the liver. Together, our data show that miR-21 deficiency promotes a pro-tumoral microenvironment, which over time fosters HCC development via pleiotropic and complex mechanisms. These results question the current dogma of miR-21 being a potent oncomiR in the liver and call for cautiousness when considering miR-21 inhibition for therapeutic purposes in HCC.

Background and Aims: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing globally, but its molecular features are not well defined. We aimed to identify unique molecular traits characterising NASH-HCC compared to other HCC aetiologies., Methods: We collected 80 NASH-HCC and 125 NASH samples from 5 institutions. Expression array (n = 53 NASH-HCC; n = 74 NASH) and whole exome sequencing (n = 52 NASH-HCC) data were compared to HCCs of other aetiologies (n = 184). Three NASH-HCC mouse models were analysed by RNA-seq/expression-array (n = 20). Activin A receptor type 2A (ACVR2A) was silenced in HCC cells and proliferation assessed by colorimetric and colony formation assays., Results: Mutational profiling of NASH-HCC tumours revealed TERT promoter (56%), CTNNB1 (28%), TP53 (18%) and ACVR2A (10%) as the most frequently mutated genes. ACVR2A mutation rates were higher in NASH-HCC than in other HCC aetiologies (10% vs. 3%, p <0.05). In vitro, ACVR2A silencing prompted a significant increase in cell proliferation in HCC cells. We identified a novel mutational signature (MutSig-NASH-HCC) significantly associated with NASH-HCC (16% vs. 2% in viral/alcohol-HCC, p = 0.03). Tumour mutational burden was higher in non-cirrhotic than in cirrhotic NASH-HCCs (1.45 vs. 0.94 mutations/megabase; p <0.0017). Compared to other aetiologies of HCC, NASH-HCCs were enriched in bile and fatty acid signalling, oxidative stress and inflammation, and presented a higher fraction of Wnt/TGF-β proliferation subclass tumours (42% vs. 26%, p = 0.01) and a lower prevalence of the CTNNB1 subclass. Compared to other aetiologies, NASH-HCC showed a significantly higher prevalence of an immunosuppressive cancer field. In 3 murine models of NASH-HCC, key features of human NASH-HCC were preserved., Conclusions: NASH-HCCs display unique molecular features including higher rates of ACVR2A mutations and the presence of a newly identified mutational signature., Lay Summary: The prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is increasing globally, but its molecular traits are not well characterised. In this study, we uncovered higher rates of ACVR2A mutations (10%) - a potential tumour suppressor - and the presence of a novel mutational signature that characterises NASH-related HCC., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest J.M.L. receives research support from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Eisai Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim and Ipsen, and consulting fees from Eli Lilly, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai Inc, Celsion Corporation, Exelixis, Merck, Ipsen, Genentech, Roche, Glycotest, Leerink Swann LLC, Fortress Biotech, Nucleix, Can-Fite Biopharma, Sirtex, Mina Alpha Ltd and AstraZeneca. S.L.F consults for the following companies: 89 Bio, Amgen, Axcella Health, Blade Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Can-Fite Biopharma, ChemomAb, Escient Pharmaceuticals, Forbion, Foresite laboratories, Galmed, Gordian Biotechnology, Glycotest, Glympse Bio, Hepgene, In sitro, Morphic Therapeutics, North Sea Therapeutics, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Scholar Rock Surrozen. He has stock options in the following companies: Blade Therapeutics, Escient, Galectin, Galmed, Genfit, Glympse, Hepgene, Lifemax, Metacrine, Morphic Therapeutics, Nimbus, North Sea Therapeutics, Scholar Rock, Surrozen. He receives research support from Morphic Therapeutics, Novo Nordisk, and Galmed, and has an SBIR grant with Abalone Bio. A.L. is a consultant for Neuwave and Histosonics. C.P.M.S.O. consults for Bayer, Novartis, Novonordisk, Allergan, Pfizer, Roche and Zambon. P.S. is receiving research grants from BMS, Roche, Incyte, Chugai and consulting fees from BMS, MSD, Incyte, Janssen, Roche, AstraZeneca and Amgen. H.W., P.T., and A.V.U. are or were salaried employees of Sema4 at the time of the study. H.W., P.T., and A.V.U. hold Sema4 stock options. B.M. received consultancy fees from Bayer-Shering Pharma, and speaker fees from Eisai and MSD. The rest of authors have nothing to disclose. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Liver transplant (LT) recipients are considered a vulnerable population amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. To date, available data have been heterogeneous and scarce. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review identifying English-language articles published in PubMed between November 2019 and 30 May 2021. We aimed to explore three areas: (1) outcome and clinical course; (2) immunological response after COVID-19 in LT recipients; and (3) vaccination response. After systematic selection, 35, 4, and 5 articles, respectively, were considered suitable for each area of analysis. Despite the heterogeneity of the reports included in this study, we found that gastrointestinal symptoms were common in LT recipients. The outcome of the LT population was not per se worse compared to the general population, although careful management of immunosuppressive therapy is required. While a complete therapy discontinuation is not encouraged, caution needs to be taken with use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), favoring tacrolimus (TAC) use. Although data conflicted about acquired immunity after SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccine immunogenicity appeared to be low, suggesting that the level of surveillance should be kept high in this population.

Background and Aim: Treatment with sorafenib causes diverse side effects, which limits adherence. This work assesses whether Home Care, a psychosocial nursing intervention, prolongs the duration of treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and if it influences health-related quality of life (HRQL)., Methods and Results: This is a cohort study using data from patients receiving sorafenib in the prospective Bern HCC Cohort at the University Hospital. Duration of treatment, overall survival, and HRQL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary questionnaire were compared in the two groups. A total of 173 patients were eligible for the analysis. Among them, 141 were in the Home Care program, and 32 were not. Patients with Home Care had a significantly longer duration of treatment (265 days vs 152 days, P  = 0.003) and a better functional well-being (17.7 vs 12.5, P  = 0.015)., Conclusion: Psychosocial interventions such as Home Care are a valid method in improving adherence to sorafenib and can therefore be recommended., (© 2021 The Authors. JGH Open published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background and Aims: The multikinase inhibitor cabozantinib has been approved for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) previously treated with sorafenib. We report safety and efficacy data of an international, multicenter, real-life cohort of patients with advanced HCC treated with cabozantinib., Methods: Patients with HCC who were treated with cabozantinib were retrospectively identified across 11 centers in Austria, Switzerland, and Germany. Patients' characteristics, adverse events, duration of treatment and overall survival (OS) data were analyzed until April 1, 2020., Results: Eighty-eight patients from 11 centers were included. The predominant underlying liver diseases were NAFLD/NASH in 26 (30%) and hepatitis C infection in 21 (24%) patients. Seventy-eight patients (89%) were classified as Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage C. Sixty patients (68%) were Child-Pugh A, whereas 22 (25%) were Child-Pugh B, respectively. Cabozantinib was used as systemic second- and third-line or later treatment in 41 (47%) and 46 (52%) patients, respectively. The following best responses under cabozantinib were documented: partial response in 6 (7%), stable disease in 28 (32%), and progressive disease in 28 (32%) patients, respectively. Fifty-two patients (59%) died during follow-up. The median OS from start of cabozantinib treatment was 7.0 months in the entire cohort and 9.7 months in Child-Pugh A patients, while Child-Pugh B patients had a median OS of 3.4 months, respectively. Thirty-seven (42%) patients fulfilled the CELESTIAL inclusion and exclusion criteria, showing a median OS of 11.1 months. Most common adverse events were fatigue (15.6%) and diarrhea (15.6%)., Conclusion: Cabozantinib treatment was effective, safe, and feasible in patients with advanced HCC in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Patients in the real-life setting had more advanced liver disease - in which 25% of patients were Child-Pugh B. However, OS in patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis was similar to that reported in the phase 3 trial (CELESTIAL)., Competing Interests: F.F. received travel support from Abbvie and Ipsen and speaker fees from AbbVie. B.S. received travel support from AbbVie, Gilead, and Ipsen. C.L. reports no conflicts of interest. J.B. served as Consultant for BTGPLC, BMS, MSD, Roche, and Eisai. He served as a Speaker for BTGPLC, Eisai, and Novartis. He received travel support from Ipsen, BTGPLC, and BMS. He is an investigator for MSD, BMS, Lilly. T.W.F. reports no conflicts of interest. C.C. received fees and travel support from Eisai, MSD, Ipsen, and Falk Foundation. A.B. reports no conflicts of interest. D.B. served as a consultant for Bayer Healthcare, Boston Scientific, and Falk Foundation. J.W. served as a consultant/speaker and received travel support from BMS, Eisai, Falk, Gilead, Ipsen, MSD, and Novartis. He is an investigator for MSD. T.M. reports no conflicts of interest. F.K. has received speakers' fees from Bayer, Ipsen, MSD, Eisai, Shire, Sirtex and has received travel grants from Eisai, Janssen, Ipsen, and Novartis. D.T.W. reports no conflicts of interest. M.S. served as a consult for Bayer Healthcare, and Falk Foundation. T.J.E: served as a speaker and/or consultant for AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, Incyte, Ipsen, Merck Serono, MSD, Roche, and Servier. He received travel support from Ipsen. He received financial support for scientific projects from Servier. A.W. is an Editorial Board Member of Liver Cancer. H.W. served as speaker for Bayer, Eisai, and Ipsen, and as a consultant for Bayer, Eisai, Lilly, BMS, Roche, and Ipsen. He conducts studies for Bayer, Roche, Lilly, MSD, and BMS. M.V. received honoraria from Merck Serono, Bayer Vital, and Sirtex and is a member of the advisory boards of Ipsen, Roche, Bayer, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, BMS, MSD, and Amgen. C.L. served as a speaker and/or consultant for AbbVie, Gilead, MSD, Norgine, Falk, Eisai, Roche, Behring, and travel received support from AbbVie and Gilead. M.P. is an investigator for Bayer, BMS, Lilly, and Roche; he received speaker honoraria from Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Lilly, and MSD; he is a consultant for Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, Eisai, Lilly, MSD, and Roche; he received travel support from Bayer and BMS. J-F.D. served in advisory committees: Abbvie, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Falk, Genfit, Genkyotex, Gilead Sciences, HepaRegenix, Intercept, Lilly, Merck, and Novartis. Speaking and teaching: Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Intercept, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, and Roche. O.W. served as a speaker and/or consultant for AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, Incyte, Ipsen, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Servier, and Shire. He received travel support from Abbvie, Bayer, BMS, Gilead, Ipsen, Medac, and Merck. He received financial support for scientific projects from Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung, IPSEN, Medac, Merck Serono, and Novartis. He is an investigator for Basilea, Incyte, and MSD., (Copyright © 2021 by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Factors and outcomes associated with decompensation of liver disease and liver failure in obese patients who underwent modern bariatric surgery are unclear. We present here a cohort of seventeen consecutive patients referred because of decompensation of liver disease following laparoscopic bariatric surgery. All patients showed signs of malnutrition (sarcopenia in 76.5%). In ten (58.8%), decompensation was associated with alcohol ingestion, which started after bariatric surgery in six patients. One patient died and three patients required liver transplantation, in one case preceded by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). However, thirteen patients achieved stabilization or full re-compensation with medical therapy and nutritional support. Our cases underline the risk of alcohol intake and malnutrition after laparoscopic bariatric surgery as causes of severe liver decompensation and underline the need for careful interdisciplinary care of these patients after surgery to early identify and treat alcohol misuse, malnutrition, and liver disease.