Search

The generation of functional mRNA in eukaryotes requires the accurate removal of noncoding regions (introns) from pre-mRNA by a process termed pre-mRNA splicing (14, 25). Splicing takes place in the spliceosome, a dynamic RNA-protein complex that assembles in a stepwise manner on the pre-mRNA (10, 14). The spliceosome is composed of small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) and extrinsic (non-snRNP) factors. The recognition of exon/intron boundaries, the splice sites, by the splicing apparatus is a critical step in processing of both constitutively and alternatively spliced pre-mRNAs. U1 snRNP defines the 5′ splice site, and U2 snRNP defines the branchpoint sequence (3, 10, 14, 17). Since in most cases the first AG dinucleotide downstream of the branchpoint is used as the 3′ splice site, by defining the branchpoint, U2 snRNP defines the 3′ splice site (18, 27). Targeting of U2 snRNP to the branch site requires the extrinsic splicing factor U2 snRNP auxiliary factor (U2AF). U2AF binds site specifically to the intron pyrimidine tract between the branchpoint sequence and 3′ splice site at an early step in spliceosome assembly and recruits U2 snRNP to the branch site (22, 29, 42). Regulation of 3′ splice site choice, both positive and negative, can be realized by influencing the pyrimidine tract binding of U2AF (33, 35, 45). Because U2AF is a major determinant in 3′ splice site selection, it has been the subject of extensive biochemical and genetic investigation. Human U2AF is a heterodimer composed of a 65-kDa large subunit (hU2AF65) and a 35-kDa small subunit (hU2AF35) (41). Both subunits are conserved in other organisms (40), and U2AF homologs have been identified in Drosophila melanogaster (9, 21), Schizosaccharomyces pombe (16, 36), and Caenorhabditis elegans (3a, 39). The Drosophila U2AF large (dU2AF50)- and small (dU2AF38)-subunit homologs are 50 and 38 kDa, respectively (9, 21). The U2AF large subunit contains three RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) and an amino-terminal arginine-serine-rich (RS) domain (42). The small subunit contains a highly degenerate RRM (pseudo-RRM) (2), two Zn2+ binding motifs (37), and a carboxyl-terminal RS domain and glycine-rich region (43). Both U2AF subunits are involved in recognition of the intron pyrimidine tract. The large subunit (hU2AF65 and dU2AF50) is required for site-specific pyrimidine tract binding (9, 42). The small subunit acts as a cofactor to stabilize the large subunit on the pyrimidine tract, apparently through protein-protein interactions with constitutive and alternative splicing factors (38, 45). While it has been firmly established that all three RRMs on hU2AF65 are necessary for high-affinity RNA binding, a role for the large-subunit RS domain in RNA binding remains unresolved (11, 42). In one study removal of the hU2AF65 RS domain had a modest effect on RNA binding (42). In a second study, the RS domain was found to be absolutely required for RNA binding (11). In vitro splicing assays using U2AF-depleted extracts prepared by two independent methods have identified independent and essential roles for the two U2AF RS domains: the large-subunit RS domain is required to target U2 snRNP to the branch site (34, 42), and in the immunodepleted extracts under certain conditions, the small-subunit RS domain is apparently necessary for protein-protein interactions with constitutive and alternative splicing factors to stabilize hU2AF65 on the pyrimidine tract (38, 45). In contrast to the essential roles assigned to the two U2AF RS domains in vitro, molecular genetic analysis of the Drosophila U2AF RS domains indicates that either one of the RS domains is dispensable in vivo (19). Importantly, at least one RS domain on U2AF is essential for viability (19). The observation that the dU2AF38 RS domain is not essential in vivo (19) refocused our attention on domains present in the U2AF small subunit that are phylogenetically conserved. In an exhaustive database search for proteins containing RRMs, some of the signature sequences of this motif were identified in hU2AF35 (2). These sequences are also present in the Drosophila and S. pombe small-subunit homologs (21, 36). Although some of the most conserved residues in the RNA recognition motif are present in the U2AF small subunits, the RNP-1 octamer is highly degenerate and the RNP-2 hexamer is absent. Since these defining submotifs and other conserved residues are not present in the U2AF small-subunit RRM, it was termed a degenerate RRM or pseudo-RRM (2). Degenerate RRMs have been identified in a collection of RNA binding proteins, including several of the SR proteins, the pyrimidine tract binding protein, and the large subunit of U2AF (10). The degenerate RRMs in SRp30a (ASF/SF2) (4, 46), pyrimidine tract-binding protein (15), and hU2AF65 (42) were all found to be required for high-affinity RNA binding. Two putative Zn2+ binding domains, one on either side of the pseudo-RRM, were recently identified in hU2AF35 in a database search (37). These Cys3His Zn2+ binding motifs are conserved in all three small subunit homologs. Though sequence-specific RNA binding has not been described for proteins that contain this type of Zn2+ binding motif, several proteins that have this domain are involved in RNA metabolism (37). The evolutionary conservation of the pseudo-RRM and the two Zn2+ binding motifs in all three U2AF small subunit homologs suggested to us that these domains are important for function. The lack of requirement for the dU2AF38 RS domain in vivo prompted us to search for novel biochemical activities associated with the small subunit. The phylogenetically conserved, degenerate RRM (2) and two Zn2+ binding motifs (37) in the small subunit suggested that it might participate in RNA binding. While we detected weak RNA binding activity for the Drosophila small subunit on its own, we found that when complexed with the large subunit, dU2AF pyrimidine tract binding affinity increased 20-fold. This increase in RNA binding activity was not specific to Drosophila U2AF; the human U2AF heterodimer bound RNA with 15-fold-higher affinity than hU2AF65. Surprisingly, removal of the dU2AF38 RS domain abolished the increase in binding activity of the dU2AF heterodimer, indicating that the RS domain is necessary for high-affinity binding. Deletion of the dU2AF50 RS domain (dU2AF50ΔRS) dramatically reduced RNA binding activity of the large-subunit monomer. High-affinity binding was restored when the dU2AF38 RS domain was supplied in trans to dU2AF50ΔRS. These data suggest that high-affinity RNA binding activity requires at least one RS domain on U2AF, which is consistent with the requirement for at least one RS domain in vivo.

The pre-mRNA splicing factor U2AF (U2 snRNP auxiliary factor) has an essential role in 3' splice site selection. U2AF binds the intron pyrimidine tract between the branchpoint and the 3' splice site and recruits U2 snRNP to the branch site at an early step in spliceosome assembly. Human U2AF is a heterodimer composed of large (hU2AF65) and small (hU2AF35) subunits. Both subunits contain a domain enriched in arginine-serine dipeptide repeats termed an RS domain. The two U2AF RS domains have been assigned essential and independent roles in spliceosome assembly in vitro-the hU2AF65 RS domain is required to target U2 snRNP to the branch site and the hU2AF35 RS domain is necessary for protein-protein interactions with constitutive and alternative splicing factors. We have investigated the functional requirements for the RS domains on the Drosophila U2AF homolog in vivo. In sharp contrast to its essential role in U2 snRNP recruitment in vitro, the RS domain on the Drosophila large subunit homolog (dU2AF50) was completely dispensable in vivo. Prompted by this unexpected result, we analyzed the RS domain on the Drosophila small subunit homolog (dU2AF38). Despite its requirement for enhancer-dependent splicing activity in vitro, the dU2AF38 RS domain was also inessential in vivo. Finally, we have tested whether the Drosophila U2AF heterodimer requires any RS domain. Flies mutant for both the small and large subunits could not be rescued by dU2AF50deltaRS and dU2AF38deltaRS transgenes. Therefore, in contrast to the separate roles assigned to the U2AF RS domains in vitro, our genetic data suggest that they may have redundant functions in vivo.

The Drosophila melanogaster hnRNP protein, hrp48, is an abundant heterogeneous nuclear RNA-associated protein. Previous biochemical studies have implicated hrp48 as a component of a ribonucleoprotein complex involved in the regulation of the tissue-specific alternative splicing of the P-element third intron (IVS3). We have taken a genetic approach to analyzing the role of hrp48. Mutations in the hrp48 gene were identified and characterized. hrp48 is an essential gene. Hypomorphic mutations which reduce the level of hrp48 protein display developmental defects, including reduced numbers of ommatidia in the eye and morphological bristle abnormalities. Using a P-element third-intron reporter transgene, we found that reduced levels of hrp48 partially relieve IVS3 splicing inhibition in somatic cells. This is the first direct evidence that hrp48 plays a functional role in IVS3 splicing inhibition.

In mammalian cells, the Ku heterodimer is involved in DNA double-strand-break recognition and repair. We have established in yeast a connection between Ku activity and DNA double-strand-break damage repair, and a connection between Ku activity and commitment to DNA replication. We generated double-stranded DNA breaks in yeast cells in vivo by expressing a restriction endonuclease and have shown that yeast mutants lacking Ku p70 activity died while isogenic wild-type cells did not. Moreover, we have discovered that DNA damage occurs spontaneously during normal yeast mitotic growth, and that Ku functions in repair of this damage. We also observed that mitotically growing Ku p70 mutants have an anomalously high DNA content, suggesting a role for Ku in regulation of DNA synthesis. Finally, we present evidence that Ku p70 function is conserved between yeast, Drosophila , and humans.

When a large amount (milligram quantities) of RNA is desired (e.g., for making RNAs for RNA interference studies or for structural analyses), it is advantageous to use optimized transcription conditions. The method described here uses high millimolar concentrations of rNTPs, pyrophosphatase, and a specially formulated high-yield transcription buffer. These conditions prevent product (pyrophosphate) inhibition of RNA polymerase, which permits the accumulation of large quantities of RNA.

Transcription and pre-mRNA alternative splicing are highly regulated processes that play major roles in modulating eukaryotic gene expression. It is increasingly apparent that other pathways of RNA metabolism, including small RNA biogenesis, can regulate these processes. However, a direct link between alternative pre-mRNA splicing and small RNA pathways has remained elusive. Here we show that the small RNA pathway protein Argonaute-2 (Ago-2) regulates alternative pre-mRNA splicing patterns of specific transcripts in the Drosophila nucleus using genome-wide methods in conjunction with RNAi in cell culture and Ago-2 deletion or catalytic site mutations in Drosophila adults. Moreover, we show that nuclear Argonaute-2 binds to specific chromatin sites near gene promoters and negatively regulates the transcription of the Ago-2-associated target genes. These transcriptional target genes are also bound by Polycomb group (PcG) transcriptional repressor proteins and change during development, implying that Ago-2 may regulate Drosophila development. Importantly, both of these activities were independent of the catalytic activity of Ago-2, suggesting new roles for Ago-2 in the nucleus. Finally, we determined the nuclear RNA-binding profile of Ago-2, found it bound to several splicing target transcripts, and identified a G-rich RNA-binding site for Ago-2 that was enriched in these transcripts. These results suggest two new nuclear roles for Ago-2: one in pre-mRNA splicing and one in transcriptional repression.

Drosophila P elements are mobile DNA elements that encode an 87-kDa transposase enzyme and transpositional repressor proteins. One of these repressor proteins is the 207-amino-acid KP protein which is encoded by a naturally occurring P element with an internal deletion. To study the molecular mechanisms by which KP represses transposition, the protein was expressed, purified, and characterized. We show that the KP protein binds to multiple sites on the ends of P-element DNA, unlike the full-length transposase protein. These sites include the high-affinity transposase binding site, an 11-bp transpositional enhancer, and, at the highest concentrations tested, the terminal 31-hp inverted repeats. The DNA binding domain was localized to the N-terminal 98 amino acids and contains a CCHC sequence, a potential metal binding motif. We also demonstrate that the KP repressor protein can dimerize and contains two protein-protein interaction regions and that this dimerization is essential for high-affinity DNA binding.

During the past year, significant advances have been made in the field of pre-mRNA splicing. It is now clear that members of the serine-arginine-rich protein family are key players in exon definition and function at multiple steps in the spliceosome cycle. Novel findings have been made concerning the role of exon sequences, which function as both constitutive and regulated enhancers of splicing, in trans-splicing and as targets for tissue-specific control of splicing patterns. By combining biochemical approaches in human and yeast extracts with genetic analysis, much has been learned about the RNA-RNA and RNA-protein interactions that are necessary to assemble the various complexes that are found along the pathway to the catalytically active spliceosome.

Mobilizing Transposable Elements Transposable elements are parasitic DNA elements that can jump around the genome. They make up large portions of eukaryotic genomes (up to 50% of the human genome). In the short term, transposable elements can generate mutations and cause large-scale damage; but, in the long term, they can drive evolution. Majumdar et al. (p. 446 ) show that the human THAP9 gene (hTh9), which contains a THAP DNA binding domain also found in the Drosophila P -element transposase, is capable of mobilizing P -elements in Drosophila cells. The hTH9 gene also caused the excision of plasmid-borne Drosophila P -elements in human cells. Furthermore, hTh9 is able to nick P -element DNA and direct its transposition into the human genome.

Alternative splicing of pre-mRNA is a highly regulated process that allows cells to change their genetic informational output. These changes are mediated by protein factors that directly bind specific pre-mRNA sequences. Although much is known about how these splicing factors regulate pre-mRNA splicing events, comparatively little is known about the regulation of the splicing factors themselves. Here, we show that the Drosophila splicing factor P element Somatic Inhibitor (PSI) is phosphorylated at at least two different sites by at minimum two different kinases, casein kinase II (CK II) and tousled-like kinase (tlk). These phosphorylation events may be important for regulating protein-protein interactions involving PSI. Additionally, we show that PSI interacts with several proteins in Drosophila S2 tissue culture cells, the majority of which are splicing factors.

PSI is an RNA-binding protein involved in repressing splicing of the P element third intron in Drosophila somatic cell extracts. PSI produced in bacteria restores splicing inhibition to an extract relieved of inhibitory activity, indicating that PSI plays a direct role in somatic inhibition. Sequence analysis of cDNAs encoding PSI reveals three KH RNA-binding domains, a conserved motif also found in the yeast splicing regulator MER1. Notably, PSI is expressed highly in somatic embryonic nuclei but is undetectable in germ-line cells. In contrast, hrp48, another protein implicated in somatic inhibition, is found in the nucleus and cytoplasm of both tissues. The splicing inhibitory properties and soma-specific expression of PSI may be sufficient to explain the germ-line-specific transposition of P elements.

One of the oldest and simplest (and still very useful) methods for detecting RNA–protein interactions is the filter-binding assay. If a mixture of RNA and protein is passed through a nitrocellulose filter, the protein will be retained and the RNA will pass through. But if the protein is capable of binding RNA, then RNA will be retained on the filter as well. This protocol requires a purified protein (or chromatographic fractions) of interest and 32P-labeled RNA. To perform the assay, the protein sample is serially diluted to several concentrations. It is then mixed with a fixed amount of radioactive RNA and allowed to bind under desired conditions for 30–60 min. The binding reactions are then applied to a 96-well dot-blot apparatus with low vacuum to trap the complexes on three membranes: The top membrane traps aggregates, the middle membrane (nitrocellulose) binds proteins and RNA–protein complexes, and the bottom membrane (which is charged) collects free RNA. After washing and drying, the membranes are exposed to phosphor-imaging screens for quantitation. Alternatively, single, larger filters (that can be counted in a scintillation counter) and a filter manifold can be used.

The RNA-binding protein Sex-lethal (Sxl) is a critical regulator of sexual differentiation and dosage compensation in Drosophila. This regulatory activity is a consequence of the ability of Sxl to bind uridine-rich RNA tracts involved in pre-mRNA splicing. Sxl contains two RNP consensus-type RNA-binding domains (RBDs). A structural study of a portion of Sxl (amino acids 199-294) containing the second RNA-binding domain (RBD-2) using multidimensional heteronuclear NMR is presented here. Nearly complete 1H, 13C, and 15N resonance assignments have been obtained from 15N- and 13C/15N-uniformly labeled protein. These assignments were used to analyze 3D 15N-separated NOESY and 13C/13C-separated 4D NOESY spectra which produced 494 total and 169 long-range NOE-derived distance restraints. Along with 41 backbone dihedral restraints, these distance restraints were employed to generate an intermediate-resolution family of calculated structures, which exhibits the beta alpha beta-beta alpha beta tertiary fold found in other RBD-containing proteins. The RMSD to the average structure for the backbone atoms of residues 11-93 is 1.55 +/- 0.30 A, while the RMSD for backbone atoms involved in secondary structure is 0.76 +/- 0.14 A. A capping box [Harper, E.T., & Rose, G.D. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 7605-7609] was identified at the N-terminus of the first helix and has been characterized by short- and medium-range NOEs. Finally, significant structural similarities and differences between Sxl RBD-2 and other RBD-containing proteins are discussed.

The large subunit of the human pre-messenger RNA splicing factor U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein auxiliary factor (hU2AF65) is required for spliceosome assembly in vitro. A complementary DNA clone encoding the large subunit of Drosophila U2AF (dU2AF50) has been isolated. The dU2AF50 protein is closely related to its mammalian counterpart and contains three carboxyl-terminal ribonucleoprotein consensus sequence RNA binding domains and an amino-terminal arginine- and serine-rich (R/S) domain. Recombinant dU2AF50 protein complements mammalian splicing extracts depleted of U2AF activity. Germline transformation of Drosophila with the dU2AF50 complementary DNA rescues a lethal mutation, establishing that the dU2AF50 gene is essential for viability. R/S domains have been found in numerous metazoan splicing factors, but their function is unknown. The mutation in Drosophila U2AF will allow in vivo analysis of a conserved R/S domain-containing general splicing factor.

Over the past year, significant progress has been made in the understanding of how RNA-binding factors may facilitate splice-site selection and spliceosome assembly, and confer fidelity to the pre-mRNA splicing reaction. In addition, a number of studies have revealed a complex network of RNA-RNA interactions in the spliceosome, strengthening the structural and functional parallels between nuclear pre-mRNA splicing and the self-splicing group I and group II introns. These new data further support the idea that pre-mRNA splicing occurs by RNA-mediated catalysis and illustrate quite dramatically the dynamic nature of conformational changes in the spliceosome cycle. With respect to tissue-specific pre-mRNA splicing, a number of studies have begun to illuminate mechanisms underlying control of splice-site selection and how so-called 'general' RNA-binding proteins, such as heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins, may be involved in determining different splicing patterns. Finally, an emerging theme involving the role of splicing in development is that differential transcriptional programs can be triggered in different cell types by alternative splicing patterns that generate transcription factor isoforms with different activities or DNA-binding specificities.

Splicing factor 1 (SF1) binds to the branch point sequence (BPS) of mammalian introns and is believed to be important for the splicing of some, but not all, introns. To help identify BPSs, particularly those that depend on SF1, we generated a BPS profile model in which SF1 binding affinity data, validated by branch point mapping, were iteratively incorporated into computational models. We searched a data set of 117,499 human introns for best matches to the SF1 Affinity Model above a threshold, and counted the number of matches at each intronic position. After subtracting a background value, we found that 87.9% of remaining high-scoring matches identified were located in a region upstream of 3'-splice sites where BPSs are typically found. Since U2AF65 recognizes the polypyrimidine tract (PPT) and forms a cooperative RNA complex with SF1, we combined the SF1 model with a PPT model computed from high affinity binding sequences for U2AF65. The combined model, together with binding site location constraints, accurately identified introns bound by SF1 that are candidates for SF1-dependent splicing.

The spliceosome, a dynamic assembly of proteins and RNAs, catalyzes the excision of intron sequences from nascent mRNAs. Recent work has suggested that the activity and composition of the spliceosome are regulated by ubiquitination, but the underlying mechanisms have not been elucidated. Here, we report that the spliceosomal Prp19 complex modifies Prp3, a component of the U4 snRNP, with nonproteolytic K63-linked ubiquitin chains. The K63-linked chains increase the affinity of Prp3 for the U5 snRNP component Prp8, thereby allowing for the stabilization of the U4/U6.U5 snRNP. Prp3 is deubiquitinated by Usp4 and its substrate targeting factor, the U4/U6 recycling protein Sart3, which likely facilitates ejection of U4 proteins from the spliceosome during maturation of its active site. Loss of Usp4 in cells interferes with the accumulation of correctly spliced mRNAs, including those for α-tubulin and Bub1, and impairs cell cycle progression. We propose that the reversible ubiquitination of spliceosomal proteins, such as Prp3, guides rearrangements in the composition of the spliceosome at distinct steps of the splicing reaction.

INTRODUCTIONMore than 95% of total RNA is composed of ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) (28S, 18S, 5.8S, and 5S). Here, we present a method that is effective in removing rRNA before extraction and purification of total RNA. If you choose to prepare cytoplasmic RNA and wish to analyze any RNA other than rRNA, it is desirable to eliminate the rRNAs by taking advantage of the fact that the ribosomal subunits are very large (40S and 60S). Few, if any, other cellular RNAs are present in such large macromolecular complexes. The vast majority of rRNAs can be removed by sedimentation. Of course, steps must be taken to avoid co-sedimentation of desired RNAs. Co-sedimentation can be greatly reduced by first dissociating ribosomes into their respective subunits by EDTA treatment. The subunits are then “cleaned” by treatment with high salt and nonionic detergent. Ribosomal subunits remain intact under these conditions and can be sedimented free of other RNAs. Subsequently, the remaining RNAs (messenger RNAs [mRNAs] and all other RNAs) can be purified and analyzed by a variety of methods.

INTRODUCTIONAfter any RNA purification by any method, it is necessary to ascertain both the amount (yield) and the integrity (quality) of the RNA obtained. This is essential for any subsequent analysis and critical for any comparative analyses. This article discusses several methods for RNA quantitation and provides tips for each.

INTRODUCTIONDNA contamination of RNA preparations can present significant problems, especially for polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based applications. No RNA extraction procedure excludes DNA entirely. Cytoplasmic RNA can be contaminated with DNA because of nuclei breakage during preparation. Moreover, TRIzol preparations do not exclude plasmids or other small DNA fragments. This article describes the reliable and effective method of eliminating DNA from RNA preparations via DNase digestion. DNase I specifically digests DNA into small oligonucleotides, leaving RNA intact.

Perhaps the most important and certainly the most often used technique in RNA analysis is gel electrophoresis. This technique is generally applicable for RNA detection, quantification, purification by size, and quality assessment. Because RNAs are negatively charged, they migrate toward the anode in the presence of electric current. The gel acts as a sieve to selectively impede the migration of the RNA in proportion to its mass, given that its mass is generally proportional to its charge. Because mass is approximately related to chain length, the length of an RNA is more generally determined by its migration. In addition, topology (i.e., circularity) can affect migration, making RNAs appear longer on the gel than they actually are. Gels are used in a wide variety of techniques, including Northern blotting, primer extension, footprinting, and analyzing processing reactions. They are invaluable as preparative and fractionating tools. There are two common types of gel: polyacrylamide and agarose. For most applications, denaturing acrylamide gels are most appropriate. These gels are extremely versatile and can resolve RNAs from ~600 to/=20 nucleotides (nt). In certain circumstances, e.g., resolving different conformers of RNAs or RNA-protein complexes, native gels are appropriate. The only disadvantage to acrylamide gels is that they are not suitable for analyzing large RNAs (or =600 nt); for such applications, agarose gels are preferred. This protocol describes how to prepare, load, and run polyacrylamide gels for RNA analysis.

INTRODUCTIONRecovery of deproteinized RNA almost always is performed via precipitation with ethanol. If the RNA is free of contaminants (i.e., it is well extracted) as determined by spectrophotometry, it will resuspend easily and be ready for any subsequent manipulation. Ethanol precipitation is quite useful because it provides quantitative recovery of any-sized RNA, from several kilobases to 20 nucleotides (nt). Major considerations in this protocol are RNA concentration, pellet identification, and resuspension.

Somatic inhibition restricts splicing of the Drosophila P-element third intron (IVS3) to the germ line. We have exploited this simple system to provide a model for a mechanism of alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Biochemical complementation experiments revealed that Drosophila somatic extracts inhibited U1 snRNP binding to the 5' splice site. Using sensitive RNase protection and modification-interference assays, we found that U1 snRNP bound to a pseudo-5' splice site in the 5' exon and that multiprotein complexes bound to an adjacent site. Binding of these factors appeared to mediate the inhibitory effect, because mutations in the pseudo-5' splice sites blocked binding and activated splicing in vitro. Likewise, wild-type, but not mutant, 5' exon RNA titrated inhibitory factors away from the pre-mRNA and activated splicing. Thus, we have defined the pseudo-5' splice sites as crucial components of the regulatory element, correlated the inhibitory activity with specific RNA binding factors from Drosophila somatic cells, and provided a mechanistic description of somatic inhibition. Because the inhibitory activity involves general splicing functions such as protein recognition of 5' splice site sequences and changes in the distribution of bound U1 snRNP, our data may also provide insights into how splice sites are selected.

We have developed an in vitro reaction system for Drosophila P element transposition. Transposition products were recovered by selection in E. coli, and contained simple P element insertions flanked by 8 bp target site duplications as observed in vivo. Transposition required Mg +2 and partially purified P element transposase. Unlike other DNA rearrangement reactions, P element transposition in vitro used GTP as a cofactor; deoxyGTP, dideoxyGTP, or the nonhydrolyzable GTP analogs GMP-PNP or GMP-PCP were also used. Transposon DNA molecules cleaved at the P element termini were able to transpose, but those lacking 3′-hydroxyl groups were inactive. These biochemical data are consistent with genetic data suggesting that P element transposition occurs via a "cut-and-paste" mechanism.

THAP-family C(2)CH zinc-coordinating DNA-binding proteins function in diverse eukaryotic cellular processes, such as transposition, transcriptional repression, stem-cell pluripotency, angiogenesis and neurological function. To determine the molecular basis for sequence-specific DNA recognition by THAP proteins, we solved the crystal structure of the Drosophila melanogaster P element transposase THAP domain (DmTHAP) in complex with a natural 10-base-pair site. In contrast to C(2)H(2) zinc fingers, DmTHAP docks a conserved beta-sheet into the major groove and a basic C-terminal loop into the adjacent minor groove. We confirmed specific protein-DNA interactions by mutagenesis and DNA-binding assays. Sequence analysis of natural and in vitro-selected binding sites suggests that several THAPs (DmTHAP and human THAP1 and THAP9) recognize a bipartite TXXGGGX(A/T) consensus motif; homology suggests THAP proteins bind DNA through a bipartite interaction. These findings reveal the conserved mechanisms by which THAP-family proteins engage specific chromosomal target elements.

Alternative mRNA splicing adds a layer of regulation to the expression of thousands of genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Not all alternative splicing results in functional protein; it can also yield mRNA isoforms with premature stop codons that are degraded by the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) pathway. This coupling of alternative splicing and NMD provides a mechanism for gene regulation that is highly conserved in mammals. NMD is also active in Drosophila, but its effect on the repertoire of alternative splice forms has been unknown, as has the mechanism by which it recognizes targets. Here, we have employed a custom splicing-sensitive microarray to globally measure the effect of alternative mRNA processing and NMD on Drosophila gene expression. We have developed a new algorithm to infer the expression change of each mRNA isoform of a gene based on the microarray measurements. This method is of general utility for interpreting splicing-sensitive microarrays and high-throughput sequence data. Using this approach, we have identified a high-confidence set of 45 genes where NMD has a differential effect on distinct alternative isoforms, including numerous RNA–binding and ribosomal proteins. Coupled alternative splicing and NMD decrease expression of these genes, which may in turn have a downstream effect on expression of other genes. The NMD–affected genes are enriched for roles in translation and mitosis, perhaps underlying the previously observed role of NMD factors in cell cycle progression. Our results have general implications for understanding the NMD mechanism in fly. Most notably, we found that the NMD–target mRNAs had significantly longer 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) than the nontarget isoforms of the same genes, supporting a role for 3′ UTR length in the recognition of NMD targets in fly., Author Summary A gene can be processed into multiple mRNAs through alternative splicing. Alternative splicing increases the number of proteins encoded by the genome, but not all alternative mRNAs produce protein. Instead, some are degraded by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), a surveillance system that was originally identified as a means of clearing the cell of mRNAs with nonsense, or stop codon, mutations. Alternative splicing that introduces early stop codons will lead to NMD, offering a way for the cell to down-regulate gene expression after a gene has been transcribed. In this paper, we have developed a new analysis method to study the combined effect of alternative splicing and degradation in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster using microarrays. We have found a stringently defined set of 45 genes that can be spliced either into an mRNA that encodes a protein or into an mRNA that is degraded by NMD, down-regulating the overall gene expression. The affected genes include a number that are central to the cell's regulatory processes, including translation, RNA splicing, and cell cycle progression. Our results also help shed light on how NMD determines whether a stop codon is premature, and thus whether to target an mRNA for degradation.

Structure of RNA Prediction and experimental investigation of RNA secondary and tertiary foldings Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase-tRNA recognition RNA-protein interactions in ribosomes RNA-protein interactions in RNase P Structure and function of hnRNP proteins RNA-protein interactions in the splicing snRNPs Interaction of 5S with TFIIIA Control of human immunodeficiency virus gene expression by the RNA-binding proteins tat and rev Using peptides to study RNA-protein recognition Study of RNA-protein recognition by in vitro selection.

Mobility of P transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster depends on the 87-kDa transposase protein encoded by the P element. Transposase recognizes a 10-base-pair DNA sequence that overlaps an A + T-rich region essential for transcription from the P-element promoter. We report here that transposase represses transcription from the P-element promoter in vitro. This transcriptional repression is blocked by prior formation of an RNA polymerase II transcription complex on the template DNA. Binding of transposase on the P-element promoter is blocked by prior binding of either the Drosophila RNA polymerase II complex or the yeast transcription factor TFIID. These data suggest that transposase represses transcription by preventing assembly of an RNA polymerase II complex at the P-element promoter.

Drosophila P transposable elements are the best-studied family of eukaryotic non-retroviral transposons. P element transposition is regulated in several different ways and has thus provided a unique system with which to study the control of DNA rearrangements and gene expression in metazoans. Recent genetic and biochemical experiments have begun to shed light on the mechanism of P element transposition and the mechanisms controlling the temporal and spatial patterns of transposition.

Drosophila P transposable elements encode two proteins, an 87 kd transposase protein and a 66 kd protein that has been hypothesized to repress transposition. We have made germline transformants carrying modified P element derivatives that encode only the 66 kd protein and shown that these elements repress transposase activity in both the germline and the soma. The position of these elements in the genome quantitatively affected their ability to negatively regulate transposase and to express the 66 kd protein. Single 66 kd element-containing strains did not exhibit the maternal inheritance of P cytotype characteristic of P strains. However, we demonstrated that a true P strain produced higher levels of the 66 kd protein during oogenesis than single 66 kd P elements. Thus, the expression of the 66 kd repressor during oogenesis may be a major determinant of the maternal effect of P cytotype.

Drosophila P-element somatic inhibitor protein (PSI) regulates splicing of the P-element transposase pre-mRNA by binding a pseudo-splice site upstream of the authentic splice site using four tandem KH-type RNA binding motifs. While the binding domains and specificity of PSI have been established, little is known about the contributions of each PSI KH domain to overall protein stability and RNA binding affinity. Using a construct containing only the RNA binding domain of PSI (PSI-KH03), we introduced a physiologically relevant point mutation into each KH domain of PSI individually and measured stability and RNA binding affinity of the resulting mutant proteins. Although secondary structure, as measured by circular dichroism spectroscopy, is only subtly changed for each mutant protein relative to wild type, RNA binding affinity is reduced in each case. Mutations in the second or third KH domains of the protein are significantly more deleterious to substrate recognition than mutation of the outer (first and fourth) domains. These results show that despite the ability of a single KH domain to bind RNA in some systems, PSI requires multiple tandem KH domains for specific and high-affinity recognition of substrate RNA.

To gain insight into splicing regulation, we developed a microarray to assay all annotated alternative splicing events in Drosophila melanogaster and identified the alternative splice events controlled by four splicing regulators: dASF/SF2, B52/SRp55, hrp48, and PSI. The number of events controlled by each of these factors was found to be highly variable: dASF/SF2 strongly affects >300 splicing events, whereas PSI strongly affects only 43 events. Pairwise analysis also revealed many instances of splice site usage affected by multiple factors and provides the framework to understand the network controlling the alternatively spliced mRNA isoforms that compose the Drosophila transcriptome.

P transposable elements in Drosophila are members of a larger class of mobile elements that move using a cut-and-paste mechanism. P-element transposase uses guanosine triphosphate (GTP) as a cofactor for transposition. Here, we use atomic force microscopy (AFM) to visualize protein-DNA complexes formed during the initial stages of P-element transposition. These studies reveal that GTP acts to promote assembly of the first detectable noncovalent precleavage synaptic complex. This initial complex then randomly and independently cleaves each P-element end. These data show that GTP acts to promote protein-DNA assembly, and may explain why P-element excision often leads to unidirectional deletions.

Pre-mRNA adenosine deaminase (ADAR) is involved in many physiological processes by either directly converting adenosine to inosine in certain pre-mRNAs or indirectly regulating expression of certain genes. Mutations of Drosophila ADAR (dADAR) results in neuronal dysfunction and hypersensitivity to oxygen deprivation. Recently, we found that the mutant flies were very resistant to paraquat, a compound that generates free radicals. In order to further characterize the neuronal role of dADAR and understand the basis for the resistance to the oxidative stress, we investigated the effect of dADAR on the expression of genes encoding scavengers of cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) in both dADAR mutant and overexpression flies. Our data show that the expression of the genes encoding known ROS scavengers [superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase] is not regulated by dADAR. However, the transcripts of genes encoding two potential ROS scavengers (dhd and Cyp4g1) were robustly increased in dADAR mutant flies, and conversely both were significantly decreased in dADAR overexpressing flies. Using dhd [encoding a Drosophila homolog of the mammalian protein thioredoxin (Trx)] transgenic flies, we confirmed that the resistance of dADAR mutant flies to paraquat resulted, at least partially, from the up-regulation of dhd gene in dADAR mutant flies. Our data not only confirm the importance of ADAR in maintenance of neuronal function but also reveal its regulatory role in the expression of genes encoding ROS scavengers.

P element excision generates a DNA double-strand break at the transposon donor site. Genetic studies have demonstrated a strong bias toward repair of P element-induced DNA breaks by homologous recombination with the sister chromatid, suggesting that P element excision occurs after DNA replication, in G2 of the cell cycle. We developed methods to arrest Drosophila tissue culture cells and assay P element excision in either G1- or G2-arrested cells. Dacapo or tribbles transgene expression arrests cells in either G2 or G2, respectively. RNA-mediated gene interference (RNAi) directed against cyclin E or cyclin A arrests cells in G1 or G2, respectively. P element excision occurs efficiently in both G1- and G2-arrested cells, suggesting that cell cycle regulation of P element transposase does not occur in our somatic cell system. DNA double-strand break repair occurs by two predominant mechanisms: homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). HR is thought to be restricted to the post-replicative, G2, phase of the cell cycle, while NHEJ may occur throughout the cell cycle. Our results indicate that NHEJ repair of an extrachromasomal plasmid substrate occurs at least as efficiently in G2-arrested cells as in asynchronous cells or in G1-arrested cells.

P transposable elements in Drosophila are mobilized via a cut-and-paste mechanism. The broken DNA ends generated during transposition can be repaired via the homology-directed synthesis-dependent strand annealing or by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). Genetic studies have demonstrated an interaction between the gene ( mus309 , for mutagen-sensitive) encoding the Drosophila Bloom's syndrome helicase homolog (DmBLM) and the Ku70 gene, which is involved in NHEJ. We have used RNA interference (RNAi) to knock down expression of DmBLM and one or both of the Drosophila Ku subunits, DmKu70 or DmKu80. Our results show that upon reduction of DmKu, an increase in small deletions (1–49 bp) and large deletions (≥50 bp) flanking the site of P element-induced breaks is observed, and a reduction in large deletions at these sites is found upon reduction of DmBLM. Moreover, double RNAi of DmKu and DmBLM results in an increase in small deletions characteristic of the DmKu RNAi and also partially suppresses the reduction in repair efficiency observed with DmKu RNAi. These results suggest that there are DNA double-strand break recognition and/or processing events involving DmKu and DmBLM that, when eliminated by RNAi, lead to deletions. Finally, these results raise the possibility that, unlike the situation in mammals, where BLM appears to function exclusively in the homologous repair pathway, in Drosophila , DmBLM may be directly involved in, or at least influence the double-strand break recognition that leads to the NHEJ repair pathway.

Transposition in many organisms is regulated to control the frequency of DNA damage caused by the DNA breakage and joining reactions. However, genetic studies in prokaryotic systems have led to the isolation of mutant transposase proteins with higher or novel activities compared to those of the wild-type protein. In the course of our study of the effects of mutating potential ATM-family DNA damage checkpoint protein kinase sites in the Drosophila P-element transposase protein, we found one mutation, S129A, that resulted in an elevated level of transposase activity using in vivo recombination assays, including P-element-mediated germline transformation. In vitro assays for P-element transposase activity indicate that the S129A mutant exhibits elevated donor DNA cleavage activity when compared to the wild-type protein, whereas the strand-transfer activity is similar to that of wild type. This difference may reflect the nature of the in vitro assays and that normally in vivo the two reactions may proceed in concert. The P-element transposase protein contains 10 potential consensus phosphorylation sites for the ATM family of PI3-related protein kinases. Of these 10 sites, 8 affect transposase activity either positively or negatively when substituted individually with alanine and tested in vivo. A mutant transposase protein that contains all eight N-terminal serine and threonine residues substituted with alanine is inactive and can be restored to full activity by substitution of wild-type amino acids back at only 3 of the 8 positions. These data suggest that the activity of P-element transposase may be regulated by phosphorylation and demonstrate that one mutation, S129A, results in hyperactive transposition.

Direct interactions between RNA-binding proteins and snRNP particles modulate eukaryotic pre-mRNA processing patterns to control gene expression. Here, we report that the conserved U1 snRNP-interacting RNA-binding protein PSI is essential for Drosophila viability. A null PSI mutation is recessive lethal at the first-instar larval stage, and lethality is fully rescued by transgenes expressing the PSI protein. A mutant transgene that lacks the PSI–U1 snRNP-interaction domain restores viability but shows courtship behavior abnormalities and meiosis defects during spermatogenesis, resulting in a complete male sterility phenotype. Using cDNA microarrays, we have identified specific target mRNAs with altered expression profiles in these mutant males. A subset of these transcripts is also found associated with PSI in endogenous immunopurified ribonucleoprotein complexes. One specific target, the hrp40/squid transcript, shows an altered pre-mRNA splicing pattern in PSI mutant testes. We conclude that a functional association between the PSI protein and the spliceosomal U1 snRNP particle is required for normal Drosophila development and for the processing of specific PSI-interacting cellular transcripts. These results also validate the use of cDNA microarrays to characterize in vivo RNA-processing defects and alternative pre-mRNA splicing patterns.

Reverse transcription coupled to the polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) is commonly used to detect the presence of mRNAs, pre-mRNAs, or other types of RNA such as noncoding RNAs. The method involves using a primer annealed to the RNA of interest. For mRNA, the primer is usually a synthetic oligo(dT)15–18, a random hexamer mixture (dN)6, or a synthetic DNA oligonucleotide that is complementary to a specific transcript (a gene-specific primer). This DNA:RNA hybrid serves as a template during reverse transcription, in which the enzyme reverse transcriptase (RT) generates a single-stranded cDNA copy of a portion of the target RNA molecule. Using random hexamer priming, it is possible to obtain representative cDNA copies of sequences from the entire length of the mRNAs and pre-mRNAs in a population. This cDNA can then be used as a template for PCR. On addition of gene-specific primers, a specific DNA fragment corresponding to a portion of the RNA of interest is generated.

The electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA), or gel mobility shift assay, is a popular and powerful technique for the detection of RNA–protein interactions. It relies on the fact that naked RNA has certain mobility on nondenaturing gels, but if the RNA is bound by protein, the mobility of the RNA is reduced. Therefore, the binding of protein results in a characteristic upward shift of the RNA on a gel, as monitored using radiolabeled RNA. For reasons that are not completely understood, most RNA–protein complexes—particularly those that result from high-affinity interactions—do not dissociate during the prolonged times required for electrophoretic separation. Because high-affinity interactions are more stable, it is often possible to identify specific interactions over a “background” of weak interactions. Accordingly, EMSAs can be performed using complex mixtures of proteins such as cell extracts. They can be used to investigate a wide range of RNA–protein interactions—from single protein-binding events to assembly of large complexes such as the spliceosome. EMSAs can also be useful for determining kinetic parameters (such as affinity constants) for RNA–protein interactions.

Here we describe how to prepare nucleoplasmic extracts from suspension cultures of Drosophila S2 (Schneider Line 2) cells. Harvested cells are washed in phosphate-buffered saline supplemented with MgCl2, resuspended in hypotonic buffer, and homogenized. Nuclei are isolated by centrifugation and then sonicated. The nuclear sonicate is placed on a 30% sucrose cushion and sedimented. The soluble nuclear ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes remain in the supernatant and the nuclear membrane fragments and chromatin pellet through the sucrose cushion.

P-element somatic inhibitor (PSI) is a KH domain-containing splicing factor highly expressed in Drosophila somatic tissues. Here we have identified a direct association of PSI with the spliceosomal U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) particle in somatic nuclear extracts. This interaction is mediated by highly conserved residues within the PSI C-terminal AB motif and the U1 snRNP-specific 70K protein. Through the AB motif, PSI modulates U1 snRNP binding on the P-element third intron (IVS3) 5′ splice site and its upstream exonic regulatory element. Ectopic expression experiments in the Drosophila female germline demonstrate that the AB motif also contributes to IVS3 splicing inhibition in vivo. These data show that the processing of specific target transcripts, such as the P-element mRNA, is regulated by a functional PSI-U1 snRNP interaction in Drosophila .

U1 snRNP is required at an early stage during assembly of the spliceosome, the dynamic ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex that performs nuclear pre-mRNA splicing. Here, we report the purification of U1 snRNP particles from Drosophila nuclear extracts and the characterization of their biochemical properties, polypeptide contents, and splicing activities. On the basis of their antigenicity, apparent molecular weight, and by peptide sequencing, the Drosophila 70K, SNF, B, U1-C, D1, D2, D3, E, F, and G proteins are shown to be integral components of these particles. Sequence database searches revealed that both the U1-specific and the Sm proteins are extensively conserved between human and Drosophila snRNPs. Furthermore, both species possess a conserved intrinsic U1-associated kinase activity with identical substrate specificity in vitro. Finally, our results demonstrate that a second type of functional U1 particle, completely lacking the U1/U2-specific protein SNF and the associated protein kinase activity, can be isolated from cultured Kc cell or Canton S embryonic nuclear extracts. This work describes the first characterization of a purified Drosophila snRNP particle and reinforces the view that their activity and composition, with the exception of the atypical bifunctional U1-A/U2-B" SNF protein, are highly conserved in metazoans.

Drosophila P-element transposition is regulated by a maternally inherited state known as P cytotype. An important aspect of P cytotype is transcriptional repression of the P-element promoter. P cytotype can also repress non-P-element promoters within P-element ends, suggesting that P cytotype repression might involve chromatin-based transcriptional silencing. To learn more about the role of chromatin in P cytotype repression, we have been studying the P strain Lk-P(1A). This strain contains two full-length P elements inserted in the heterochromatic telomere-associated sequences (TAS elements) at cytological location 1A. Mutations in the Polycomb group gene (Pc-G gene), Enhancer of zeste (E(z)), whose protein product binds at 1A, resulted in a loss of Lk-P(1A) cytotype control. E(z) mutations also affected the trans-silencing of heterologous promoters between P-element termini by P-element transgenes inserted in the TAS repeats. These data suggest that pairing interactions between P elements, resulting in exchange of chromatin structures, may be a mechanism for controlling the expression and activity of P elements.

P elements are a family of mobile DNA elements found in Drosophila . P‐element transposition is tightly regulated, and P‐element‐encoded repressor proteins are responsible for inhibiting transposition in vivo . To investigate the molecular mechanisms by which one of these repressors, the KP protein, inhibits transposition, a variety of mutant KP proteins were prepared and tested for their biochemical activities. The repressor activities of the wild‐type and mutant KP proteins were tested in vitro using several different assays for P‐element transposase activity. These studies indicate that the site‐specific DNA‐binding activity of the KP protein is essential for repressing transposase activity. The DNA‐binding domain of the KP repressor protein is also shared with the transposase protein and resides in the N‐terminal 88 amino acids. Within this region, there is a C 2 HC putative metal‐binding motif that is required for site‐specific DNA binding. In vitro the KP protein inhibits transposition by competing with the transposase enzyme for DNA‐binding sites near the P‐element termini.

The heterodimeric pre-mRNA splicing factor, U2AF (U2 snRNP auxiliary factor), plays a critical role in 3′ splice site selection. Although the U2AF subunits associate in a tight complex, biochemical experiments designed to address the requirement for both subunits in splicing have yielded conflicting results. We have taken a genetic approach to assess the requirement for the Drosophila U2AF heterodimer in vivo. We developed a novel Escherichia coli copurification assay to map the domain on the Drosophila U2AF large subunit (dU2AF50) that interacts with the Drosophila small subunit (dU2AF38). A 28-amino-acid fragment on dU2AF50 that is both necessary and sufficient for interaction with dU2AF38 was identified. Using the copurification assay, we scanned this 28-amino-acid interaction domain for mutations that abrogate heterodimer formation. A collection of these dU2AF50 point mutants was then tested in vivo for genetic complementation of a recessive lethal dU2AF50 allele. A mutation that completely abolished interaction with dU2AF38 was incapable of complementation, whereas dU2AF50 mutations that did not effect heterodimer formation rescued the recessive lethal dU2AF50 allele. Analysis of heterodimer formation in embryo extracts derived from these interaction mutant lines revealed a perfect correlation between the efficiency of subunit association and the ability to complement the dU2AF50 recessive lethal allele. These data indicate that Drosophila U2AF heterodimer formation is essential for viability in vivo, consistent with a requirement for both subunits in splicing in vitro.

We developed in vitro assays to study the first step of the P-element transposition reaction: donor DNA cleavage. We found that P-element transposase required both 5′ and 3′ P-element termini for efficient DNA cleavage to occur, suggesting that a synaptic complex forms prior to cleavage. Transposase made a staggered cleavage at the P-element termini that is novel for all known site-specific endonucleases: the 3′ cleavage site is at the end of the P-element, whereas the 5′ cleavage site is 17 bp within the P-element 31-bp inverted repeats. The P-element termini were protected from exonucleolytic degradation following the cleavage reaction, suggesting that a stable protein complex remains bound to the element termini after cleavage. These data are consistent with a cut-and-paste mechanism for P-element transposition and may explain why P elements predominantly excise imprecisely in vivo.

RNA is photoreactive on exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light in the 250- to 270-nm range. On UV treatment, RNA bases absorb energy to generate free radicals that can covalently attach to nearby amino acid residues in RNA-bound proteins. UV cross-linking experiments have been extensively used to identify and characterize RNA-binding proteins. The method described here involves the use of 32P-labeled RNA and crude extracts or purified proteins.

For large-scale transcription reactions or for cost savings, a laboratory may want to prepare its own recombinant T7-, SP6-, or T3-phage RNA polymerases. It is convenient to perform this preparation every 2–3 years and have a consistent and reliable source of phage RNA polymerase for many in vitro transcription reactions. In the protocol presented here, the recombinant plasmid expressing T7 RNA polymerase (RNAP) as a his6-tagged molecule is under an isopropyl β-d-1-thio-galactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible promoter. The bacteria are lysed by sonication, the his6-tagged protein in the bacterial lysate is purified by binding to Ni-NTA agarose, and the resin is then extensively washed and eluted with imidazole. The purified enzyme is dialyzed against a glycerol-containing storage buffer and can then be stored for months or years at −20°C.