Search

Summary. Objective. To analyze the cost of monotherapeutic treatment of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Patients and methods. We analysed the cost of treatment with lamotrigine (LTG), carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT) and valproic acid (VPA) using published data regarding the efficacy and tolerability of comparative clinical trials of monotherapy. We established a model of treatment for newly diagnosed patients during the first 12 months after diagnosis. A panel of doctors reached a consensus on the use of resources, costs and model of treatment in Spain. We made a cost minimization analysis for economic assessment of the data based on the fact that randomised trials indicated that CBZ, LTG, PHT and VPA were of similar efficacy. Analysis was done as ‘intention to treat’. Only direct medical costs were considered. Results. In Spain treatment with LTG is twice or three times as expensive as treatment with the other drugs. Sensitivity analysis showed that variations in the interval of use of resources and of costs (defined by the panel of doctors) did not significantly alter the results. Conclusions. Treatment with LTG is more expensive than treatment with the classical drugs. In view of the methodological limitations of this study, further analysis is necessary, particularly of the methodology of cost-benefit, to evaluate the economic impact of the new antiepileptic drugs and determine whether their use is justified as drugs of first choice. [REV NEUROL 2000; 31: 828-32] [http://www.revneurol.com/3109/j090828.pdf]

EDITOR,—Having read Brian Hurwitz's editorial considering the fate of doctors who deviate from clinical guidelines and how they might fare in court,1 I thought that the everyday reality of clinical guidelines as seen from the perspective of a senior house officer might be of interest. Clinical guidelines are usually issued by specialist departments as an aid to staff. The number of guidelines gradually proliferates: most hospitals …

A recent United Kingdom cost minimization analysis (CMA) of four antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used to treat newly diagnosed adult epilepsy demonstrated that a new drug, lamotrigine (LTG), incurred higher costs than carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), and valproate (VPA), whose costs were similar. This analysis took account of each drug's side effect and tolerability profile. The present analysis investigated the costs of treatment with LTG, CBZ, PI-IT, and VPA in 12 European countries. Data were derived from published sources and from a panel of locally based experts. When no published data were available, estimates were obtained using expert opinion by a consensus method. These data were incorporated into a treatment pathway model, which considered the treatment of patients during the first 12 months after diagnosis. The primary outcome considered was seizure freedom. Randomized controlled trials demonstrate that the drugs considered are equally effective in terms of their ability to achieve seizure freedom, and thus the most appropriate form of economic evaluation is a CMA. These trials provided data on the incidence of side effects, dosages, and retention rates. The economic perspective taken was that of society as a whole and the analysis was calculated on an "intent-to-treat" basis. Only direct medical costs were considered. In each country considered, LTG was twofold to threefold more expensive than the other drugs considered. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that varying each of the assumptions (range defined by expert panels) did not significantly alter the results obtained.