Search

Background: Graft denervation in heart transplant recipients causes sinus tachycardia, occasionally requiring pharmacologic heart rate reduction. Currently, no 12-month data regarding effects of the novel I(f) channel antagonist ivabradine on heart rate control, effects on left ventricular mass, tolerability, and safety are available in patients after heart transplantation (HTX)., Methods: Mean heart rate, left ventricular mass indexed (LVMI) to body surface area, tolerability, and safety of ivabradine therapy were evaluated at baseline and after 12 months in 30 HTX recipients with marked sinus tachycardia., Results: In three patients (10.0% of total), ivabradine medication was discontinued. Further analysis was based on 27 patients with 12-month drug exposure. Mean patient age was 53.3+/-11.3 years, and mean time after HTX was 5.0+/-4.8 years. Mean ivabradine dose was 12.5 mg/day (+/-3.3 mg). Mean heart rate was reduced from 96.2+/-8.6 beats per minute (bpm) at baseline to 80.9+/-8.1 bpm at follow-up (P<0.0001). A statistically significant effect of heart rate reduction on LVMI was observed (104.3+/-22.7 g at baseline vs. 95.9+/-18.5 g at follow-up, P=0.04). No statistically significant changes in immunosuppressive drug dosage or blood levels were observed, except from a lower mycophenolate mofetil dose at follow-up (P=0.01). Safety laboratory values were unchanged. No phosphenes were observed., Conclusions: Heart rate reduction with ivabradine is effective and safe in heart transplant recipients. After 12 months, significant effects on LVMI were observed. Therefore, ivabradine may offer a beneficial effect on left ventricular remodelling in HTX patients.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate functional effects of immunoadsorption (IA) in severely limited study patients with chronic nonfamilial dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and to analyze the prevalence of Troponin I (TNI) autoantibodies., Background: Immunoadsorption (IA) has been shown to induce early hemodynamic improvement in patients with nonfamilial DCM., Methods: We performed IA using Immunosorba columns on five consecutive days in 27 patients with chronic DCM, congestive heart failure of NYHA class >or=II, left ventricular ejection fraction below 40%, and mean time since initial diagnosis of 7.2 +/- 6.8 years., Results: Immediately after IA, IgG decreased by 87.7% and IgG3 by 58.5%. Median NT-pro BNP was reduced from 1740.0 ng/L at baseline to 1504.0 ng/L after 6 months (P = 0.004). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was not significantly improved overall (24.1 +/- 7.8% to 25.4 +/- 10.4% after 6 months, P = 0.38), but LVEF improved >or=5% (absolute) in 9 of 27 (33%) patients. Bicycle spiroergometry showed a significant increase in exercise capacity from 73.7 +/- 29.4 Watts to 88.8 +/- 31.1 Watts (P = 0.003) after 6 months while VO2max rose from 13.7 +/- 3.8 to 14.9 +/- 3.0 mL/min kg after 6 months (P = 0.09). Subgroup analysis revealed a higher NT-pro BNP reduction in patients with shorter disease duration (P = 0.03) and without TNI autoantibodies at baseline (P = 0.05). All 9 patients with an absolute increase of LVEF of >or=5.0% were diabetic (P = 0.0001)., Conclusions: In this study, on severely limited heart failure patients with nonfamilial DCM, IA therapy moderately improved markers of heart failure severity in a limited subgroup of patients. This may be due to the selected study population with end-stage heart failure patients and the lower reduction of IgG3 compared to previous studies. Future blinded multicenter studies are necessary to identify those patients that benefit most.

Development of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a serious complication following heart transplantation (HTX). This study investigates EBV DNA load in adult heart transplant recipients, its association with immunosuppression, and its potential as a marker for development of PTLD. EBV DNA load was measured prospectively by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 172 stable HTX patients. Sixty-seven patients (39.0% of total) had a positive EBV PCR at initial examination [median 4.9 (range 1.1-16.9) years post-HTX]. In follow-up testing of 67 positive patients 6 months later, 36 patients continued to have a positive EBV PCR. Overall incidence of EBV DNA was significantly associated with calcineurin inihibitors, azathioprine medication, and with the absence of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment. In patients with positive EBV DNA levels at initial examination and negative levels at retesting, cyclosporine A levels were found to be significantly higher at initial examination (148.4 +/- 70.2 vs. 119.6 +/- 53.5 ng/ml, P < 0.05). Three patients (1.7%, 3/172) were diagnosed with PTLD during the course of the study (mean follow up 4.0 years). EBV DNA viral load determination does not appear to be useful for risk prediction or early diagnosis of PTLD in adults after HTX, but an association of EBV DNA load with qualitative and quantitative immunosuppression is demonstrated.

Background: Graft denervation in heart transplant recipients causes sinus tachycardia, occasionally requiring pharmacologic heart rate reduction. The If channel antagonist ivabradine has not been compared to beta-blocker after heart transplantation. Heart rate control, tolerability, short-term safety, and effects on exercise capacity were studied consecutively with an established heart rate-reducing drug (metoprolol succinate) compared to a novel agent (ivabradine) in heart transplant recipients., Methods: In 25 heart transplant recipients, heart rate, exercise capacity, and patient preference were assessed under no medication (baseline) and after consecutive 8-week treatment periods under metoprolol and ivabradine., Results: Drug discontinuation following side effects occurred in 5 patients (metoprolol: 4, ivabradine: 1); per-protocol analysis was performed on 20 patients completing both consecutive treatment periods. Mean heart rate was reduced from baseline (96.5+/-7.0 bpm) to 84.4+/-8.8 bpm on beta-blocker (P=0.0004 vs. baseline) and to 76.2+/-8.9 bpm with ivabradine (P=0.0001 vs. baseline and P=0.003 vs. beta-blocker). Exercise capacity by spiroergometry was not altered by either drug. Relevant pharmacokinetic interaction with immunosuppressants was not seen under ivabradine; safety laboratory values were unchanged. Mild adverse effects were noted in 45% of patients during beta-blocker and 20% during ivabradine treatment. Questionnaire analysis demonstrated patient preference for heart rate reduction with ivabradine., Conclusions: Heart rate reduction with ivabradine is effective and potentially better tolerated than beta-blocker therapy in heart transplant recipients. Although the prognostic role of heart rate after HTX is unknown, ivabradine may offer relevant symptomatic benefit, especially in cases of beta-blocker intolerance.