Search

Sympathetic nervous system regulation by the α(1)-adrenergic receptor (AR) subtypes (α(1A), α(1B), α(1D)) is complex, whereby chronic activity can be either detrimental or protective for both heart and brain function. This review will summarize the evidence that this dual regulation can be mediated through the different α(1)-AR subtypes in the context of cardiac hypertrophy, heart failure, apoptosis, ischemic preconditioning, neurogenesis, locomotion, neurodegeneration, cognition, neuroplasticity, depression, anxiety, epilepsy, and mental illness.

The sympathetic nervous system regulates human immune system functions through epinephrine (Epi) and norepinephrine (NE) activation of adrenergic receptors (AR) expressed on immunocompetent cell populations. The anti-inflammatory effects that are most often attributed to increased sympathetic activity have been shown to occur through β2- and α2-AR stimulation. However, dichotomous AR effects on immune system function are becoming increasingly apparent. Reports of α1-AR expression on immune cell populations have been conflicting due to a lack of specific antibodies or subtype-selective receptor ligands. This has made α1-AR identification difficult and further characterization of α1-AR subtype expression limited. Nevertheless, there is some evidence suggesting an induction of α1-AR expression on immunocompetent cells under certain physiological conditions and disease states. Also, the function of α1-AR activation to modulate immune responses is just beginning to emerge in the literature. Changes in the secretion of inflammatory mediators as well as increased cell migration and differentiation have been described following α1-AR stimulation on immunocompetent cells. These observations demonstrate the significance of α1-AR activity in immune cell biology and emphasize the importance for understanding α1-AR effects on the immune system.

alpha 1-Adrenergic receptors (ARs) are members of the guanine nucleotide-binding protein-coupled receptor superfamily. The genes for all ARs described thus far are intronless. We report here the cloning and the nucleotide sequence of the gene for the human alpha 1B-AR. It consists of two exons and a single large intron of at least 20 kilobases which interrupts the coding region at the end of the putative sixth transmembrane domain. The deduced amino acid sequence of the encoded receptor has a high degree of homology to the cloned hamster, rat, and dog alpha 1B-ARs. To characterize the encoded protein, a fusion gene constructed by splicing together exon 1 and exon 2 was expressed transiently in COS-1 cells. The transfected gene fusion product resulted in the production of an alpha 1B-AR with ligand binding characteristics indistinguishable from those of the expressed hamster alpha 1B cDNA. Evidence that the human alpha 1B-AR gene we have isolated is indeed transcribed is the finding of similar sized (2.8-kilobase) transcripts in human heart and other tissues by Northern blot analysis when either exon 1 or exon 2 is used as a probe. Moreover, using primers designed to span the exon 1/exon 2 boundary, a polymerase chain reaction product generated from single-stranded DNA prepared from human heart mRNA had the exact size and nucleotide sequence predicted for a transcript in which exon 1 is spliced to exon 2. The 5'-flanking region (924 base pairs (bp)) of exon 1 contains neither a TATA box nor a CAAT box but is high in GC content (70%) and contains several Sp1 binding sites (GC boxes), consistent with promoters described for housekeeping genes. The 5'-untranslated region also contains a putative cyclic AMP response element. Primer extension studies and RNase protection assays suggested that there are several potential transcription start sites in most tissues with a predominant site located 173 bp upstream from the translation start site. The 3'-flanking region contains a putative polyadenylation signal (ATTAAA) 492 bp downstream from the stop codon. The genomic organization of the human alpha 1B-AR with a single large intron interrupting its coding region differs from those of other ARs as well as muscarinic and 5-hydroxy-tryptamine receptors, which are intronless. The location of the intron in the human alpha 1B-AR gene is also unique among those members of the G-protein-coupled receptor family that do possess introns.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The understanding of the function of alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors in the brain has been limited due to a lack of specific ligands and antibodies. We circumvented this problem by using transgenic mice engineered to overexpress either wild-type receptor tagged with enhanced green fluorescent protein or constitutively active mutant alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor subtypes in tissues in which they are normally expressed. We identified intriguing alpha(1A)-adrenergic receptor subtype-expressing cells with a migratory morphology in the adult subventricular zone that coexpressed markers of neural stem cell and/or progenitors. Incorporation of 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine in vivo increased in neurogenic areas in adult alpha(1A)-adrenergic receptor transgenic mice or normal mice given the alpha(1A)-adrenergic receptor-selective agonist, cirazoline. Neonatal neurospheres isolated from normal mice expressed a mixture of alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor subtypes, and stimulation of these receptors resulted in increased expression of the alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor subtype, proneural basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors, and the differentiation and migration of neuronal progenitors for catecholaminergic neurons and interneurons. alpha(1)-Adrenergic receptor stimulation increased the apoptosis of astrocytes and regulated survival of neonatal neurons through phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling. However, in adult normal neurospheres, alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor stimulation increased the expression of glial markers at the expense of neuronal differentiation. In vivo, S100-positive glial and betaIII tubulin neuronal progenitors colocalized with either alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor subtype in the olfactory bulb. Our results indicate that alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors can regulate both neurogenesis and gliogenesis that may be developmentally dependent. Our findings may lead to new therapies to treat neurodegenerative diseases.

We have recently identified and characterized a chymotrypsin-like serine proteinase in human heart (human heart chymase) that is the most catalytically efficient enzyme described, thus far, for the cleavage of angiotensin I to yield angiotensin II and the dipeptide His-Leu. Compared to other chymases, this enzyme also has an unusually high degree of specificity for the substrate angiotensin I. We report here the molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of the gene and cDNA encoding human heart chymase, and determination of its entire deduced amino acid sequence. These data indicate that human heart chymase is highly homologous to other members of the chymase subfamily of chymotrypsin-like proteinases and, most likely, all evolved from a common ancestral gene. Potential regulatory elements found in the 5'-untranslated region of other chymases are also found in the human heart chymase gene. However, this gene lacks mast cell-specific sequences found in the 5'- and 3'-untranslated regions of the rat chymase II gene. In addition, human heart chymase contains clusters of unique amino acid sequences located at key positions likely involved in substrate binding, which may contribute to its high substrate specificity. These contrasting features of the human heart chymase gene and cDNA, and the potential determinants of its primary structure that underlie its unique functional characteristics are considered.

Background— Antibodies to the β 1 -adrenergic receptor (β 1 AR) are detected in a substantial number of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The mechanism whereby these autoantibodies exert their pathogenic effect is unknown. Here, we define a causal mechanism whereby β 1 AR-specific autoantibodies mediate noninflammatory cardiomyocyte cell death during murine DCM. Methods and Results— We used the β 1 AR protein as an immunogen in SWXJ mice and generated a polyclonal battery of autoantibodies that showed selective binding to the β 1 AR. After transfer into naive male hosts, β 1 AR antibodies elicited fulminant DCM at high frequency. DCM was attenuated after immunoadsorption of β 1 AR IgG before transfer and by selective pharmacological antagonism of host β 1 AR but not β 2 AR. We found that β 1 AR autoantibodies shifted the β 1 AR into the agonist-coupled high-affinity state and activated the canonical cAMP-dependent protein kinase A signaling pathway in cardiomyocytes. These events led to functional alterations in intracellular calcium handling and contractile function. Sustained agonism by β 1 AR autoantibodies elicited caspase-3 activation, cardiomyocyte apoptosis, and DCM in vivo, and these processes were prevented by in vivo treatment with the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK. Conclusions— Our data show how β 1 AR-specific autoantibodies elicit DCM by agonistically inducing cardiomyocyte apoptosis.

The function and distribution of alpha1-adrenergic receptor (AR) subtypes in prostate cancer cells is well characterized. Previous studies have used RNA localization or low-avidity antibodies in tissue or cell lines to determine the alpha1-AR subtype and suggested that the alpha1A-AR is dominant. Two androgen-insensitive, human metastatic cancer cell lines DU145 and PC3 were used as well as the mouse TRAMP C1-C3 primary and clonal cell lines. The density of alpha1-ARs was determined by saturation binding and the distribution of the different alpha1-AR subtypes was examined by competition-binding experiments. In contrast to previous studies, the major alpha1-AR subtype in DU145, PC3 and all of the TRAMP cell lines is the alpha1B-AR. DU145 cells contained 100% of the alpha1B-AR subtype, whereas PC3 cells were composed of 21% alpha1 A-AR and 79% alpha1B-AR. TRAMP cell lines contained between 66% and 79% of the alpha1B-AR with minor fractions of the other two subtypes. Faster doubling time in the TRAMP cell lines correlated with decreasing alpha 1B-AR and increasing alpha1 A- and alpha1D-AR densities. Transfection with EGFP-tagged alpha1B-ARs revealed that localization was mainly intracellular, but the majority of the receptors translocated to the cell surface after extended preincubation (18 hr) with either agonist or antagonist. Localization was confirmed by ligand-binding studies and inositol phosphate assays where prolonged preincubation with either agonist and/or antagonist increased the density and function of alpha 1-ARs, suggesting that the native receptors were mostly intracellular and nonfunctional. Our studies indicate that alpha1B-ARs are the major alpha1-AR subtype expressed in DU145, PC3, and all TRAMP cell lines, but most of the receptor is localized in intracellular compartments in a nonfunctional state, which can be rescued upon prolonged incubation with any ligand.

Transactivation of EGF receptors by G protein-coupled receptors is a well-known phenomenon. This process involves the ectodomain shedding of growth factors in the EGF family by matrix metalloproteinases. However, many of these studies employ transformed and/or cultured cells that overexpress labeled growth factors. In addition, few studies have shown that EGF itself is the growth factor that is shed and is responsible for transactivation of the EGF receptor. In this study, we show that freshly isolated, nontransformed lacrimal gland acini express two of the three known α1-adrenergic receptors (ARs), namely, α1B- and α1D-ARs. α1D-ARs mediate phenylephrine (an α1-adrenergic agonist)-induced protein secretion and activation of p42/p44 MAPK, because the α1D-AR inhibitor BMY-7378, but not the α1A-AR inhibitor 5-methylurapidil, inhibits these processes. Activation of p42/p44 MAPK occurs through transactivation of the EGF receptor, which is inhibited by the matrix metalloproteinase ADAM17 inhibitor TAPI-1. In addition, phenylephrine caused the shedding of EGF from freshly isolated acini into the buffer. Incubation of freshly isolated cells with conditioned buffer from cells treated with phenylephrine resulted in activation of the EGF receptor and p42/p44 MAPK. The EGF receptor inhibitor AG1478 and an EGF-neutralizing antibody blocked this activation of p42/p44 MAPK. We conclude that in freshly isolated lacrimal gland acini, α1-adrenergic agonists activate the α1D-AR to stimulate protein secretion and the ectodomain shedding of EGF to transactivate the EGF receptor, potentially via ADAM17, which activates p42/p44 MAPK to negatively modulate protein secretion.

Although the adrenergic receptors have been cloned since the late 1980s and early 1990s, analysis of the expression of the subtypes in specific tissues and cell types has been hampered because of the lack of high-affinity and high-avidity antibodies. Most of the antibodies currently available have limited use in transfected systems in which receptor density is high but give poor results when used to determine endogenous expression. This limitation in antibody avidity is common in membrane proteins and in G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) because of poor protein purification and membrane epitope recognition. Although analysis of ligand binding to tissue homogenates yields an estimate of the tissue content of the various adrenergic receptor subtypes, it does not have sufficient resolution to determine cell type distribution. Currently, methods useful for determining receptor localization are in situ hybridization histochemistry and receptor autoradiography. This chapter reviews the localization of the various adrenergic receptors using these methods. I also introduce the concept and utility of using transgenic mice expressing fluorescenttagged adrenergic receptor subtypes to determine the cell type-specific localization of these receptors using the α1-adrenergic receptor as a model system.

The advent of DNA microarray technology has provided a means to identify changes in the expression of thousands of genes simultaneously. This research tool has enabled investigators to study the effects of adrenergic receptor (AR) stimulation on gene expression on a large scale and has led to the identification of many genes that are regulated by adrenergic receptors (ARs). Microarrays have been used to compare the effects of α1A-AR, α1B-AR, and α1D-AR stimulation on gene expression. This work demonstrated that all three α1-AR subtypes commonly regulate many types of genes. However, genes that are regulated by only one or two α1-AR subtypes have also been identified. These data provide evidence that the physiological roles of the three α1-AR subtypes are not redundant despite their activation by the same ligand, use of common signal transduction pathways, and overlapping tissue distributions. Microarray studies have also identified genes that underlie AR-mediated regulation of the cell cycle, apoptosis, neuronal differentiation, cell hypertrophy, and other biological processes that are regulated by ARs. In addition, microarrays have identified changes in gene expression that accompany AR-mediated disease states, including cardiac hypertrophy, neurodegeneration, and hypermetabolism. The purpose of this chapter is to review how microarrays have contributed to our understanding of AR function at the genomic level.

The first half of the 20th century saw the development of the concept of a receptor and the isolation of the first hormone. The last half of the 20th century revealed that there are many subtypes of the adrenergic receptors with different pharmacological properties, and that they are coupled to different G proteins and signal transduction mechanisms. We then basically determined how the ligands bind to the receptor, how G proteins become activated, and how G proteins can selectively couple to receptors through interactions with the intracellular loops of the receptor. We also determined which tissues contain the different subtypes and some of the physiological processes that are regulated by the receptors. The century ended with the cloning of the receptors and the application of basic molecular biological techniques to discern the roles of the individual subtypes. Although much information was garnered in cell lines, there remained a noticeable lack of information in integrated systems and whole animal physiology.

Background The authors tested the hypothesis that the intravenous anesthetic fentanyl would attenuate the pulmonary vasoconstrictor response to alpha1-adrenoceptor activation. They also investigated the alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes that could potentially mediate this effect of fentanyl. Methods Endothelium-denuded canine pulmonary arterial rings were suspended for isometric tension recording. Dose-response curves for the alpha1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine were generated in the absence and presence of fentanyl. The effects of inhibiting alpha2 (rauwolscine), alpha1 (prazosin), alpha1A (5-methylurapidil), alpha1B (chloroethylclonidine), and alpha1D (BMY 7378) adrenoceptors on phenylephrine contraction were also investigated. Receptor "protection" studies were performed to investigate the specific role of alpha1B adrenoceptors in mediating fentanyl-induced changes in phenylephrine contraction. Finally, competition binding studies were performed in rat-1 fibroblasts stably transfected with human alpha1-adrenoceptor complementary DNAs corresponding to the alpha1A-, alpha1B-, or alpha1D-adrenoceptor subtypes to directly assess whether fentanyl can compete for the alpha1-adrenoceptor activation pocket. Results Fentanyl attenuated phenylephrine contraction in a dose-dependent fashion. Rauwolscine had no effect on phenylephrine contraction. Phenylephrine contraction was inhibited by prazosin and abolished by chloroethylclonidine but was relatively resistant to inhibition by 5-methylurapidil and BMY 7378. Pretreatment with fentanyl before exposure to chloroethylclonidine increased the maximal contractile response to phenylephrine compared to chloroethylclonidine pretreatment alone. Competition binding studies revealed that fentanyl binds to all three alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes, with a fivefold greater affinity for the alpha1B-adrenoceptor compared with the alpha1D-adrenoceptor subtype. Conclusion Phenylephrine-induced contraction is primarily mediated by alpha1B-adrenoceptor activation in canine pulmonary artery. Fentanyl attenuates phenylephrine contraction by binding to alpha1B adrenoceptors.

Studies have been amassed in the past several years indicating that an agonist can conform a receptor into an activation state that is dependent upon an intrinsic property of the agonist usually based upon its chemical composition. Theoretically, each different agonist could impart its own unique activation state. Evidence for multiple signaling states for the G-protein-coupled receptors will be reviewed and is derived from many different pharmacological behaviors: efficacy, kinetics, protean agonism, differential desensitization and internalization, inverse agonism, and fusion chimeras. A recent extension of the ternary complex model is suggested by evidence that the different processes that govern deactivation, such as desensitization and internalization, is also regulated by conformers specific to the agonist. Rhodopsin may serve as a primer for the study of multiple activation states. Therapeutic implications that utilize multiple signaling states hold vast promise in the rationale design of drugs.

This Perspective focuses on the article by Fredriksson and Schiöth in the May [corrected] 2005 issue of Molecular Pharmacology. Their article describes the expansion and evolution of G protein-coupled receptors during the nematode-to-chordate split.

Adrenergic receptors (ARs) play an important role in the regulation of cardiac function. Cardiac inotropy is primarily regulated by beta(1)-ARs. However, alpha(1)-ARs may play an important role in inotropy during heart failure. Previous work has suggested that the alpha(1B)-AR modulates beta(1)-AR function in the heart. The potential role of the alpha(1A)-AR has not been previously studied. We used transgenic mice that express constitutively active mutant (CAM) forms of the alpha(1A)-AR or alpha(1B)-AR regulated by their endogenous promoters. Expression of the CAM alpha(1A)-AR or CAM alpha(1B)-AR had no effect on basal cardiac function (developed pressure, +dP/dT, -dP/dT, heart rate, flow rate). However, both alpha(1)-AR subtypes significantly decreased isoproterenol-stimulated +dP/dT. Pertussis toxin had no effect on +dP/dT in CAM alpha(1A)-AR hearts but restored +dP/dT to non-transgenic values in CAM alpha(1B)-AR hearts. Radioligand binding indicated a selective decrease in the density of beta(1)-ARs in both CAM mice. However, G-proteins, cAMP, or the percentage of high and low affinity states were unchanged in either transgenic compared with control. These data demonstrate that CAM alpha(1A)- and alpha(1B)-ARs both down regulate beta(1)-AR-mediated inotropy in the mouse heart. However, alpha(1)-AR subtypes are coupled to different beta-AR mediated signaling pathways with the alpha(1B)-AR being pertussis toxin sensitive.

Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is an adult-onset sporadic progressive neurodegenerative disorder of unknown etiology that is clinically characterized by the variable combination of signs of autonomic failure parkinsonism, cerebellar ataxia, and pyramidal signs. MSA affects both men and women in their 6th decade and progresses relentlessly until death after an average of nine years' survival from the onset of symptoms. Currently available therapeutic strategies for MSA are to keep the patient comfortable and to provide some respite for the patient's symptoms. To date, there are no treatment strategies that arrest or delay the progression of MSA. This chapter focuses on a transgenic mouse model that systemically overexpresses the α 1s -adrenergic receptor. Adrenergic receptors mediate the sympathetic nervous system by binding epinephrine and norepinephrine. The role of this receptor in the central nervous system is unknown but is thought to be stimulatory in nature, to affect the release of other neurotransmitters, and to be involved in locomotion. Nevertheless, this mouse model is useful in deciphering the neurotransmission pathways involved with MSA and may lead to some therapeutic recourse for patients.

Alpha(1)-Adrenergic receptors have been implicated in growth-promoting pathways. A microarray study of individual alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor subtypes (alpha(1A), alpha(1B), and alpha(1D)) expressed in Rat-1 fibroblasts revealed that epinephrine altered the transcription of several cell cycle regulatory genes in a direction consistent with the alpha(1A)- and alpha(1D)-adrenergic receptors mediating G(1)-S cell cycle arrest and the alpha(1B-)mediating cell-cycle progression. A time course indicated that in alpha(1A) cells, epinephrine stimulated a G(1)-S arrest, which began after 8 h of stimulation and maximized at 16 h, at which point was completely blocked with cycloheximide. The alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor profile also showed unchecked cell cycle progression, even under low serum conditions and induced foci formation. The G(1)-S arrest induced by alpha(1A)- and alpha(1D)-adrenergic receptors was associated with decreased cyclin-dependent kinase-6 and cyclin E-associated kinase activities and increased expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27(Kip1), all of which were blocked by prazosin. There were no differences in kinase activities and/or expression of p27(Kip1) in epinephrine alpha(1B)-AR fibroblasts, although the microarray did indicate differences in p27(Kip1) RNA levels. Cell counts proved the antimitotic effect of epinephrine in alpha(1A) and alpha(1D) cells and indicated that alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor subtype expression was sufficient to cause proliferation of Rat-1 fibroblasts independent of agonist stimulation. Analysis in transfected PC12 cells also confirmed the alpha(1A)- and alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor effect. The alpha(1B)-subtype native to DDT1-MF2 cells, a smooth muscle cell line, caused progression of the cell cycle. These results indicate that the alpha(1A)- and alpha(1D)-adrenergic receptors mediate G(1)-S cell-cycle arrest, whereas alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor expression causes a cell cycle progression and may induce transformation in sensitive cell lines.

Brief periods of ischemia stimulate an endogenous mechanism in the heart that protects the myocardium from subsequent ischemic injury. alpha1-Adrenergic receptors (ARs) have been implicated in this process. However, the lack of sufficiently selective antagonists has made it difficult to determine which alpha1-AR subtype protects the heart from ischemic injury. The goal of this study was to identify the alpha1-AR subtype that is involved in ischemic preconditioning.We developed transgenic mice that express constitutively active mutant (CAM) forms of the alpha1A-AR or the alpha1B-AR regulated by their endogenous promoters. Hearts isolated from transgenic and non-transgenic mice were perfused by the Langendorff method using an ischemic preconditioning perfusion protocol or a non-preconditioning perfusion protocol prior to 30-min ischemia and 40-min reperfusion. Contractile function was continuously monitored through an intraventricular balloon.The contractile function of non-transgenic hearts perfused according to the ischemic preconditioning protocol completely recovered from 30-min ischemia. However, non-transgenic hearts perfused according to the non-preconditioning protocol recovered only 60% of their contractile function. The contractile function of CAM alpha1A-AR hearts, but not CAM alpha1B-AR hearts, completely recovered from 30-min ischemia even though they were perfused according to the non-preconditioning protocol. Thus, CAM alpha1A-AR hearts, but not CAM alpha1B-AR hearts, were inherently preconditioned against ischemic injury. Staurosporine, but not chelerythrine, completely reversed the preconditioning effect of CAM alpha1A-ARs.These data demonstrate that alpha1A-ARs protect the heart from ischemic injury through a staurosporine-sensitive signaling pathway that is independent of protein kinase C.

Alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes (alpha(1A)-, alpha(1B)-, alpha(1D)-) are known to couple to similar signaling pathways, although differences among the subtypes do exist. As a more sensitive assay, we used oligonucleotide microarrays to identify gene expression changes in Rat-1 fibroblasts stably expressing each individual subtype. We report the gene expressions that change by at least a factor of 2 or more. Gene expression profiles significantly changed equally among all three subtypes, despite the unequal efficacy of the inositol phosphate response. Gene expressions were clustered into cytokines/growth factors, transcription factors, enzymes, and extracellular matrix proteins. There were also a number of individual subtype-specific changes in gene expression, suggesting a link to independent pathways. In addition, all three alpha(1)-AR subtypes robustly stimulated the transcription of the prohypertrophic cytokine interleukin (IL)-6, but differentially altered members of the IL-6 signaling pathway (gp-130 and STAT3). This was confirmed by measurement of secreted IL-6, activated STAT3, and gp-130 levels. Activation of STAT3 Tyr705 phosphorylation by the alpha(1)-ARs was not through IL-6 activation but was synergistic with IL-6, suggesting direct effects. Interestingly, alpha(1B)-AR stimulation caused the dimerization-dependent phosphorylation of Tyr705 on STAT3 but did not activate the transcriptional-dependent phosphorylation of Ser727. The alpha(1B)-AR also constitutively down-regulated the protein levels of gp-130. These results suggest that the alpha(1B)-AR has differential effects on the phosphorylation status of the STAT3 pathway and may not be as prohypertrophic as the other two subtypes.

The regulation of cardiac and vascular function by the alpha 1B- and alpha 1D-adrenoceptors (ARs) has been assessed in two lines of transgenic mice, one over-expressing a constitutively active alpha 1B-AR mutation (alpha 1B-ARC128F) and the other an alpha 1D-AR knockout line. The advantage of using mice expressing a constitutively active alpha 1B-AR is that the receptor is tonically active, thus avoiding the use of nonselective agonists that can activate all subtypes. In hearts from animals expressing alpha 1B-ARC128F, the activities of the mitogen-activated protein kinases, extracellular signal-regulated kinase, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase were significantly elevated compared with nontransgenic control animals. Mice over-expressing the alpha 1B-ARC128F had echocardiographic evidence of contractile dysfunction and increases in chamber dimensions. In isolated-perfused hearts or left ventricular slices from alpha 1B-ARC128F-expressing animals, the ability of isoproterenol to increase contractile force or increase cAMP levels was significantly decreased. In contrast to the prominent effects on the heart, constitutive activation of the alpha 1B-AR had little effect on the ability of phenylephrine to induce vascular smooth muscle contraction in the isolated aorta. The ability of phenylephrine to stimulate coronary vasoconstriction was diminished in alpha 1D-AR knockout mice. In alpha 1D-AR knockout animals, no negative effects on cardiac contractile function were noted. These results show that the alpha1-ARs regulate distinctly different physiologic processes. The alpha 1B-AR appears to be involved in the regulation of cardiac growth and contractile function, whereas the alpha 1D-AR is coupled to smooth muscle contraction and the regulation of systemic arterial blood pressure.

We had previously reported that systemic overexpression of the alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor (AR) in a transgenic mouse induced a neurodegenerative disease that resembled the parkinsonian-like syndrome called multiple system atrophy (MSA). We now report that our mouse model has cytoplasmic inclusion bodies that colocalize with oligodendrocytes and neurons, are positive for alpha-synuclein and ubiquitin, and therefore may be classified as a synucleinopathy. Alpha-synuclein monomers as well as multimers were present in brain extracts from both normal and transgenic mice. However, similar to human MSA and other synucleinopathies, transgenic mice showed an increase in abnormal aggregated forms of alpha-synuclein, which also increased its nitrated content with age. However, the same extracts displayed decreased phosphorylation of alpha-synuclein. Other traits particular to MSA such as Purkinje cell loss in the cerebellum and degeneration of the intermediolateral cell columns of the spinal cord also exist in our mouse model but differences still exist between them. Interestingly, long-term therapy with the alpha(1)-AR antagonist, terazosin, resulted in protection against the symptomatic as well as the neurodegeneration and alpha-synuclein inclusion body formation, suggesting that signaling of the alpha(1B)-AR is the cause of the pathology. We conclude that overexpression of the alpha(1B)-AR can cause a synucleinopathy similar to other parkinsonian syndromes.

Progress toward elucidating the function of alpha1B-adrenergic receptors (alpha1BARs) in the central nervous system has been constrained by a lack of agonists and antagonists with adequate alpha1B-specificity. We have obviated this constraint by generating transgenic mice engineered to overexpress either wild-type or constitutively active alpha1BARs in tissues that normally express the receptor, including the brain. All transgenic lines showed granulovacular neurodegeneration, beginning in alpha1B-expressing domains of the brain and progressing with age to encompass all areas. The degeneration was apoptotic and did not occur in non-transgenic mice. Correspondingly, transgenic mice showed an age-progressive hindlimb disorder that was parkinsonian-like, as demonstrated by rescue of the dysfunction by 3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalanine and considerable dopaminergic-neuronal degeneration in the substantia nigra. Transgenic mice also had a grand mal seizure disorder accompanied by a corresponding dysplasia and neurodegeneration of the cerebral cortex. Both behavioral phenotypes (locomotor impairment and seizure) could be partially rescued with the alpha1AR antagonist terazosin, indicating that alpha1AR signaling participated directly in the pathology. Our results indicate that overstimulation of alpha1BAR leads to apoptotic neurodegeneration with a corresponding multiple system atrophy indicative of Shy-Drager syndrome, a disease whose etiology is unknown.

We examined the role that aromatic residues located in the transmembrane helices of the alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptor play in promoting antagonist binding. Since alpha(1)-antagonists display low affinity binding at beta(2)-adrenergic receptors, two phenylalanine residues, Phe-163 and Phe-187, of the alpha(1a)-AR were mutated to the corresponding beta(2)-residue. Neither F163Q nor F187A mutations of the alpha(1a) had any effect on the affinity of the alpha(1)-antagonists. However, the affinity of the endogenous agonist epinephrine was reduced 12.5- and 8-fold by the F163Q and F187A mutations, respectively. An additive loss in affinity (150-fold) for epinephrine was observed at an alpha(1a) containing both mutations. The loss of agonist affinity scenario could be reversed by a gain of affinity with mutation of the corresponding residues in the beta(2) to the phenylalanine residues in the alpha(1a). We propose that both Phe-163 and Phe-187 are involved in independent aromatic interactions with the catechol ring of agonists. The potency but not the efficacy of epinephrine in stimulating phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis was reduced 35-fold at the F163Q/F187A alpha(1a) relative to the wild type receptor. Therefore, Phe-163 and Phe-187 represent novel binding contacts in the agonist binding pocket of the alpha(1a)-AR, but are not involved directly in receptor activation.

The functionality of a 3422-base pair promoter fragment from the mouse alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(1B)AR) gene was examined. This fragment, cloned from a mouse genomic library, was found to have significant sequence homology to the known human and rat alpha(1B)AR promoters. However, the consensus motif of several key cis-acting elements is not conserved among the rat, human, and mouse genes, suggesting species specificity. Confirming fidelity of the murine promoter, robust in vitro expression of a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter was detected in known alpha(1B)AR-expressing BC(3)H1, NB41A3, and DDT(1)MF-2 cells transiently transfected with a promoter-CAT construct. Conversely, minimal CAT expression was detected in known alpha(1B)AR-negative RAT-1 and R3T3 cells. These findings were extended by transfecting the same promoter-CAT construct into various primary cell types. In support of the hypothesis that alpha(1)ARs are differentially expressed in the smooth muscle of the vasculature, primary cultures of superior mesenteric and renal artery vascular smooth muscle cells showed significantly stronger CAT expression than did vascular smooth muscle cells derived from pulmonary, femoral, and iliac arteries. Primary osteoblastic bone-forming cells, which are known to be alpha(1B)AR negative, showed minimal CAT expression. Indicating regulatory function through cis-acting elements, RAT-1, R3T3, NB41A3, BC(3)H1, and DDT(1)MF2 cells transfected with the promoter-CAT construct all showed increased CAT production when challenged with forskolin or hypoxic conditions. Additionally, tissue-specific regulation of the promoter was observed when cells were simultaneously challenged with both forskolin and hypoxia. These results collectively demonstrate that a 3.4-kb PvuII fragment of the murine alpha(1B)AR gene promoter can: 1) drive tissue-specific production of a CAT reporter in both clonal and primary cell lines; and 2) confer tissue-specific regulation of that CAT reporter when induced by challenge with forskolin and/or hypoxic conditions.

Alpha 1-adrenergic receptor (AR) activation is thought to be initiated by disruption of a constraining interhelical salt bridge (). Disruption of this salt bridge is achieved through a competition for the aspartic acid residue in transmembrane domain three by the protonated amine of the endogenous ligand norepinephrine and a lysine residue in transmembrane domain seven. To further test this hypothesis, we investigated the possibility that a simple amine could mimic an important functional group of the endogenous ligand and break this alpha 1-AR ionic constraint leading to agonism. Triethylamine (TEA) was able to generate concentration-dependent increases of soluble inositol phosphates in COS-1 cells transiently transfected with the hamster alpha 1b-AR and in Rat-1 fibroblasts stably transfected with the human alpha 1a-AR subtype. TEA was also able to synergistically potentiate the second messenger production by weak partial alpha 1-AR agonists and this effect was fully inhibited by the alpha 1-AR antagonist prazosin. However, this synergistic potentiation was not observed for full alpha 1-AR agonists. Instead, TEA caused a parallel rightward shift of the dose-response curve, consistent with the properties of competitive antagonism. TEA specifically bound to a single population of alpha 1-ARs with a Ki of 28.7 +/- 4.7 mM. In addition, the site of binding by TEA to the alpha 1-AR is at the conserved aspartic acid residue in transmembrane domain three, which is part of the constraining salt bridge. These results indicate a direct interaction of TEA in the receptor agonist binding pocket that leads to a disruption of the constraining salt bridge, thereby initiating alpha 1-AR activation.

Publisher Summary To rationally design selective drugs, an understanding of subtype differences in the ligand binding pockets would be invaluable. It is hypothesized that only a few nonconserved residues are critical for the ligand-binding specificity of each α 1 AR subtype. Nothing is known about the agonist-dependent molecular mechanisms of α 1 AR stimulation. The activation mechanism for a related G-protein-coupled receptor, rhodopsin, has been studied. The ligand isomerization of retinal when exposed to light breaks a constraining salt-bridge between transmembranes (TMs) 3 and 7, allowing the rhodopsin receptor to adopt an active conformation that can now signal through transducin. A “constraining factor” has also been postulated for the α 1b AR subtype, holding the receptor in a basal configuration until bound by a receptor agonist. However, no molecular evidence for this α 1 BR constraining factor has been presented. In this chapter, the activational mechanism is also explored by testing the hypothesis that α 1 ARs conserved the activational mechanism of rhodopsin in which a saltbridge between TM 3 and TM 7 is disrupted. If the salt-bridge hypothesis is correct, eliminating the negative charge at position 125 should also generate constitutively active α 1b ARs. To investigate this possibility, the D 125 of the WT α 1b AR was changed to an A or a K. The binding properties for these D 125 mutations showed no significant changes in affinity for antagonists when compared with the WT (wild-type) receptor. However, there was a significantly lowered epinephrine affinity (threefold) for these D 125 mutant receptors when compared with the WT α 1b R. This decrease in the epinephrine-binding affinity is likely because of the elimination of the conserved negative charged at position 125, shown in the β AR system to be responsible for docking with the protonated amine of epinephrine.

This review is intended to discuss recent developments in the molecular pharmacology of the alpha 1-adrenergic receptor (alpha 1-AR) subtypes. After a brief historical development, we will focus on the more contemporary issues having to do with this receptor family. Emphasis will be put on recent data regarding the cloning, nomenclature, signalling mechanisms, and genomic organization of the alpha 1-AR subtypes. We will also highlight recent mutational studies that identify key amino acid residues involved in ligand binding, as well as the role of the alpha 1-AR subtypes in regulating physiologic processes.

Activation of the beta2- and alpha2-adrenergic receptors (AR) involves hydrogen bonding of serine residues in the fifth transmembrane segment (TMV) to the catechol hydroxyls of the endogenous agonists, epinephrine and norepinephrine. With the beta2-AR both Ser204 and Ser207 but not a third TMV serine (Ser203) are required for binding and full agonist activity. However, with the alpha2a-AR only one of two TMV serines (Ser204, equivalent to Ser207 in the beta-AR) appears to contribute partially to agonist-binding and activation. Because the alpha1a-AR uniquely contains only two TMV serines, this subtype was used to systematically evaluate the role of hydrogen bonding in alpha1-AR activation. Binding of epinephrine or its monohydroxyl congeners, phenylephrine and synephrine, was not decreased when tested with alanine- substitution mutants that lacked either Ser188 (Ser188--Ala) or Ser192 (Ser192--Ala). With the substitution of both serines in the double mutant, Ser188/192--Ala, binding of all three ligands was significantly reduced (10- 100-fold) consistent with a single hydrogen bond interaction. However, receptor-mediated inositol phosphate production was markedly attenuated only with the Ser188--Ala mutation and not with Ser192--Ala. In support of the importance of Ser188, binding of phenylephrine (meta-hydroxyl only) by Ser192--Ala increased 7-fold over that observed with either the wild type receptor or the Ser188--Ala mutation. Binding of synephrine (para-hydroxyl only) was unchanged with the Ser192--Ala mutation. In addition, when combined with a recently described constitutively active alpha1a-AR mutation (Met292--Leu), only the Ser188--Ala mutation and not Ser192--Ala relieved the high affinity binding and increased agonist potency observed with the Met292--Leu mutation. A simple interpretation of these findings is that the meta-hydroxyl of the endogenous agonists preferentially binds to Ser188, and it is this hydrogen bond interaction, and not that between the para-hydroxyl and Ser192, that allows receptor activation. Furthermore, since Ser188 and Ser192 are separated by three residues on the TMV alpha-helix, whereas Ser204 and Ser207 of the beta2-AR are separated by only two residues, the orientation of the catechol ring in the alpha1-AR binding pocket appears to be unique and rotated approximately 120 degrees to that in the beta2-AR.

alpha 1-Adrenergic receptor (AR) subtypes mediate many effects of the sympathetic nervous system. The three cloned subtypes (alpha 1a-AR, alpha 1b-AR, alpha 1d-AR), although structurally similar, bind a series of ligands with different relative potencies. This is particularly true for the alpha 1a-AR, which recognizes a number of agonists and antagonists with 5-50-fold higher affinity than the alpha 1b- or alpha 1d- subtypes. Since ligands bind to receptor-residues that are located in the transmembrane spanning domains, we hypothesize that subtype differences in ligand recognition are due to differences in the binding properties of nonconserved transmembrane residues. Using site-directed mutagenesis, selected putative ligand-binding residues in the alpha 1b-AR were converted, either individually or in combination, to the corresponding residues in the alpha 1a-AR. Mutation of two such residues (of approximately 172 amino acids in the transmembrane domains) converted the agonist binding profile entirely to that of the alpha 1a-AR. Over 80% of this conversion was due to an Ala204--Val substitution; the remainder was due to the additional substitution of Leu314--Met. To confirm that Ala204 and Leu314 are indeed critical for agonist subtype-selectivity, the equivalent residues in the alpha 1a-AR (Val185 and Met293) were reversed of that of the alpha 1b-AR. Correspondingly, the agonist-binding profile of this double alpha 1a-AR mutant reverted to that of the alpha 1b-AR. From these data, in conjunction with macromolecular modeling of the ligand-binding pocket, a model has been developed, which indicates that the determinants of these two residues for agonist subtype-selectivity are due not only to interactions between their side chains and specific ligand moieties but also to a critical interaction between these two amino acids.

Reply to “Overstimulation of the α 1B -adrenergic receptor causes a “seizure plus” syndrome”

Background One main research challenge in the post-genomic era is to understand the relationship between protein sequences and their biological functions. In recent years, several automated annotation systems have been developed for the functional assignment of uncharacterized proteins. The underlying assumption of these systems is that similar sequences imply similar biological functions. However, it has been noted that matching sequences do not always infer similar functions. Results In this paper, we present the correlation between protein sequences and protein functions for the yeast proteome in the context of gene ontology. A novel measure is introduced to define the overall similarity between two protein sequences. The effects of the level as well as the size of a gene ontology group on the degree of similarity were studied. The similarity distributions at different levels of gene ontology trees are presented. To evaluate the theoretical prediction power of similar sequences, we computed the posterior probability of correct predictions. Conclusion The results indicate that protein pairs of similar biological functions tend to have higher sequence similarity, although the similarity distribution in each functional group is heterogeneous and varies from group to group. We conclude that sequence similarity can serve as a key measure in protein function prediction. However, the resulting annotations must be verified through other means. A method that combines a broader range of measures is more likely to provide more accurate prediction. Our study indicates that the posterior probability of a correct prediction could serve as one of the key measures.

4-Hydroxy-3,5-dinitroacetophenone anion inhibits erythrocyte anion transport with a K 50 of 220 μ m in 165 m m KCl, pH 7.3, at 0°C. Substitution of bromine atoms on the α-carbon greatly enhances the inhibitory potency of this class of compounds. Thus, α-bromo-4-hydroxy-3,5-dinitroacetophenone ( III ) anion inhibits chloride transport in erythrocyte ghosts with K 50 values of 13 and 5.3 μ m when [Cl] o = 165 and 16.5 m m KCl, respectively, and [Cl] i = 165 m m . α,α-Dibromo-4-hydroxy-3,5-dinitroacetophenone ( IV ) anion has K 50 values of 0.73 and 0.36 μ m under identical conditions. IV , which can cause >99.9% inhibition without allowing nonspecific leakage of Cl − across the membrane, is one of the most potent monoanion inhibitors of erythrocyte anion transport yet reported. The crystal structure of III has been determined [ P2 1 2 1 2 1 , a = 9.805(1), b = 20.691(2), c = 5.013(1) A , R = 0.042, R w = 0.045 ]. The substituted aromatic ring and the α-bromoacetophenone group form a planar molecule. The bromine atom is within 0.0844(1) A of the plane of the aromatic ring, and the CBr bond is quite short [1.914(6) A]. Both of these observations suggest considerable delocalization of the bromine lone pair electrons into the π system of the molecule.