51. The Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve
- Author
-
Marc P. Pelletier, Ramsey G. Powell, Michael W.A. Chu, Denis Bouchard, Corey Adams, and Kevin N. Melvin
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Aortic valve ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Hemodynamics ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Prosthesis ,law.invention ,Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ,03 medical and health sciences ,Postoperative Complications ,0302 clinical medicine ,Aortic valve replacement ,law ,Internal medicine ,Minimally invasive cardiac surgery ,Cardiopulmonary bypass ,Humans ,Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ,Medicine ,Endocarditis ,Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ,business.industry ,Aortic Valve Stenosis ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Stenosis ,Treatment Outcome ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,030228 respiratory system ,Aortic Valve ,Heart Valve Prosthesis ,Cardiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Surgical aortic valve replacement with a stented prosthesis has been the standard of care procedure for aortic stenosis. The Perceval (LivaNova, London, United Kingdom) is a sutureless aortic valve bioprosthesis currently implanted in more than 20,000 patients. The purpose of this article was to review the literature available after 9 years of clinical experience of the Perceval aortic valve. PubMED, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched. A meta-analysis of summary statistics from individual studies was conducted. A total of 333 studies were identified and 84 studies were included. Thirty-day mortality and 5-year survival ranged from 0% to 4.9% and 71.3% to 85.5%, respectively. Compared with stented prosthesis, pooled analysis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times (minutes) with Perceval (38.6 vs 63.3 and 61.4 vs 84.9, P < 0.00001, respectively). Compared with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, pooled analysis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction with Perceval in paravalvular leakage (1.26% vs 14.31%) and early mortality (2.3% vs 6.9%). Favorable hemodynamics, acceptable valve durability, and ease of implantation in minimally invasive cases were reported as benefits. A trend toward increased rates of permanent pacemaker implantation and low postoperative platelet count were identified. Special use and off-label procedures described included bicuspid aortic valves, valve-in-valve for homo-graft and stentless prosthesis failure, concomitant valvular procedures, porcelain aorta, and endocarditis. The Perceval valve has shown safe clinical and hemodynamic outcomes. Outcomes support its continued usage and potential expansion.
- Published
- 2017