Search

Since there is no universal standard of beauty, each aesthetic provider's definition may shape his/her practice of aesthetic procedures. Beauty and attractiveness are commonly defined by both mathematical and cultural influences and are shaped by our surroundings and what is most familiar to us. Therefore, we thoroughly explored the literature to better elucidate these variables and biases that affect the perception of beauty, in order to better provide appropriate and customized aesthetic procedures that preserve each individuals' own unique beauty. Understanding how each provider's own bias and aesthetic preferences differs from that of his/her patients may go a long way to improving communication in the consultation process and patient satisfaction with the outcomes achieved. We know that clinicians many times superimpose their biases onto their patients, so it is important that each practitioner accounts for bias in aesthetic medicine when consulting with patients and colleagues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Selfies and filtered selfies are becoming more prevalent throughout society and in the facial plastic surgery clinic. The term "Snapchat dysmorphia" has been used to describe patients seeking procedures to look like their selfie or filtered selfie. This is particularly frequent in the Millennial population, aged 22 to 37 years.Objectives: The authors sought to determine the effects on first impression from different photograph types: selfies, filtered selfies, a rear-facing smartphone camera, and a digital camera (DC). We hypothesize that the DC photographs will have the highest rated first impressions among evaluators despite the popularity of selfies and filtered selfies.Methods: This study included 240 evaluators and 4 patients each completing the 4 different photograph types. The evaluators completed a survey rating first impression on various measures of success for each photograph type.Results: A total of 960 first impressions were recorded for each of the 8 subscales, yielding 7680 individual assessments of first impression. The DC photograph was found to have the highest first impression scores among the 4 photograph types. There was no statistical difference between selfies and filtered selfies. The rear-facing smartphone camera received the lowest first impression scores.Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the standard DC photograph taken during a preoperative consultation has higher first impressions than selfies or filtered selfies. Although "Snapchat dysmorphia" may continue to be a growing trend in the near future, our findings provide important information to discuss with patients in the preoperative visit to set realistic expectations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A subset of facelift patients have premature redevelopment of skin laxity in the lower face and neck. Many patients seek alternatives to revision facelifts to avoid high risks and costs. Radiofrequency‐assisted lipolysis (RFAL) with Radiofrequency (RF) microneedling may be alternative minimally invasive options. Objective/Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency energy devices for treatment of premature jowl and neck skin laxity following facialplasty. Methods: This is a single‐center, prospective study of patients seeking treatment for jowl and neck skin laxity 1‐5 years following facialplasty. Treatment was performed with the InMode radiofrequency AccuTite® and Morpheus8® systems. Study duration was 12 months with 6 months of follow‐up. Endpoints included improvement in skin tightening assessed by blinded investigators, and investigator and subject assessment of skin appearance. Subjects also rated satisfaction with treatment and pain levels. Results: The study protocol was completed by nine patients. Based on investigator evaluations, 33% had marked improvement at 3 months, which increased to 55% at 6‐month postprocedure. Patient‐reported improvement was "markedly improved" in 67%, "moderate improvement" in 11%, and "slight improvement" in 22% at 3 months. Overall patient satisfaction was rated as "very satisfied" by 33% and "satisfied" by 67% at 3 months. There were no adverse events reported. Conclusion: The results of this study provide supporting evidence that RFAL technology can provide a safe, minimally invasive, and effective treatment for skin laxity in the jowls and neck in patients who desire further correction after undergoing primary facelift. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Synthetic soft tissue fillers frequently used to restore facial volume do not provide a regenerative framework, limiting their sustained efficacy. Autologous fat transfer for facial rejuvenation supports tissue regeneration but has unpredictable outcomes depending on the quality of harvesting, processing, and implantation. Aims: Exploration of the pros and cons of available tissue fillers and the role of an injectable Allograft Adipose Matrix (AAM) for facial rejuvenation. Methods: The results of a literature review conducted by two clinicians with extensive experience in this field were discussed by a panel of dermatologists and surgeons who regularly treat patients with signs and symptoms of facial aging. A manuscript was prepared and reviewed by the panel taking into account the evidence and their clinical experience treating patients for facial rejuvenation. Results: Facial rejuvenation needs to address the volume deficiency and repositioning of ptotic soft tissues. Frequently used synthetic fillers are suitable candidates for improving the facial appearance of fine lines and for molding. A better understanding of facial volume loss has allowed the use of adipose fat cells for facial rejuvenation. The injectable AAM is readily available and provides a regenerative framework for sustainable results. Prospective clinical and randomized studies support the effective and safe use of AAM for facial rejuvenation. Conclusion: AAM may offer an alternative to synthetic fillers and autologous fat implantation in the face without the cumbersome process of fat harvesting and processing. More robust studies are to confirm the positive results obtained in smaller studies using the soft tissue bio stimulatory injectable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This is the first study to evaluate the effect of premaxillary filler injection on nasal tip projection, upper lip projection, and upper lip vermilion height.Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to analyze the change in nasal tip projection (measured by the Goode ratio) and the change in upper lip projection (measured by the Z angle) following premaxillary hyaluronic acid injection. A secondary objective was to measure the change in upper lip vermilion height. We hypothesized that treated subjects will show an increase in nasal tip projection, upper lip projection, and upper lip vermilion height.Methods: Twenty volunteer patients with signs of perioral aging or poor upper lip projection were enrolled in this prospective cohort study and underwent premaxillary hyaluronic acid filler injection between November 2017 and June 2018. Nasal tip projection, upper lip projection, and upper lip vermilion height were assessed from baseline and posttreatment photographs based on the Goode ratio, Z angle, and lip vermilion height ratio, respectively.Results: No significant change was noted between pre- and posttreatment Goode ratio measurements (P = 0.841). There was a significant decrease in Z angle and therefore significant increase in upper lip projection with treatment (P < 0.001). The lip vermilion height ratio demonstrated a trend of increased upper lip vermilion height but this did not achieve statistical significance (P = 0.561).Conclusions: Premaxillary filler treatment resulted in a significant increase in upper lip projection. Premaxillary filler injection when performed in a safe manner is a valuable treatment option for perioral rejuvenation.Level Of Evidence:4: [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cosmeceutical therapies including face washes, moisturizers, chemical peels and antioxidant formulations are intended to improve the esthetic appearance of skin. The use of these products as adjuncts to full facial rejuvenation with hyaluronic acid filler and abobotulinumtoxinA may improve cosmetic and socio‐esthetic outcomes. Objective: To characterize the effect of skin care products in subjects undergoing full facial rejuvenation with abobotulinumtoxinA and hyaluronic acid in improving facial skin appearance, patient satisfaction, and projected first impressions. Methods: Twenty subjects were recruited and divided into two treatment groups. Subjects in Group A followed a standard skin care regimen, whereas subjects in Group B received a more robust skin care regimen including chemical peels and antioxidant formulations. All subjects underwent facial rejuvenation treatments with hyaluronic acid at Visit 2 and with abobotulinumtoxinA at Visit 7. Patient esthetic improvement, satisfaction, self‐esteem, and first impression were evaluated via the Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Assessment Scale, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, Skin Quality Assessment, Heatherton & Polivy State Self‐Esteem Scale, Subject Satisfaction Scale, and the First Impressions Questionnaire. Results: Both treatment groups experienced significant improvements in the Skin Quality Assessment, Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Assessment Scale, Heatherton and Polivy State Self‐Esteem Scale, and First Impressions Questionnaire. Conclusion: The cosmeceutical therapies used in this study in combination with abobotulinumtoxinA and hyaluronic acid filler improved subjects' skin quality, self‐esteem, and projected first impressions. Larger studies are needed to determine the most efficacious combination of topical skin therapies with facial rejuvenation therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]