Search

Androgen receptor signaling fuels prostate cancer and is a major therapeutic target. However, mechanisms of resistance to therapeutic androgen ablation are not well understood. Here, using a prostate cancer mouse model, Ptenpc−/−, carrying a prostate epithelial-specific Pten deletion, we show that the αvβ6 integrin is required for tumor growth in vivo of castrated as well as of noncastrated mice. We describe a novel signaling pathway that couples the αvβ6 integrin cell surface receptor to androgen receptor via activation of JNK1 and causes increased nuclear localization and activity of androgen receptor. This downstream kinase activation by αvβ6 is specific for JNK1, with no involvement of p38 or ERK kinase. In addition, differential phosphorylation of Akt is not observed under these conditions, nor is cell morphology affected by αvβ6 expression. This pathway, which is specific for αvβ6, because it is not regulated by a different αv-containing integrin, αvβ3, promotes upregulation of survivin, which in turn supports anchorage-independent growth of αvβ6-expressing cells. Consistently, both αvβ6 and survivin are significantly increased in prostatic adenocarcinoma, but are not detected in normal prostatic epithelium. Neither XIAP nor Bcl-2 is affected by αvβ6 expression. In conclusion, we show that αvβ6 expression is required for prostate cancer progression, including castrate-resistant prostate cancer; mechanistically, by promoting activation of JNK1, the αvβ6 integrin causes androgen receptor–increased activity in the absence of androgen and consequent upregulation of survivin. These preclinical results pave the way for further clinical development of αvβ6 antagonists for prostate cancer therapy. Cancer Res; 76(17); 5163–74. ©2016 AACR.

SummarySpinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) is a neurodegenerative disease caused by a polyglutamine expansion in the androgen receptor (AR) and is associated with misfolding and aggregation of the mutant AR. We investigated the role of an interdomain interaction between the amino (N)-terminal FxxLF motif and carboxyl (C)-terminal AF-2 domain in a mouse model of SBMA. Male transgenic mice expressing polyQ-expanded AR with a mutation in the FxxLF motif (F23A) to prevent the N/C interaction displayed substantially improved motor function compared with N/C-intact AR-expressing mice and showed reduced pathological features of SBMA. Serine 16 phosphorylation was substantially enhanced by the F23A mutation; moreover, the protective effect of AR F23A was dependent on this phosphorylation. These results reveal an important role for the N/C interaction on disease onset in mice and suggest that targeting AR conformation could be a therapeutic strategy for patients with SBMA.

// Devin G. Roller 1 , Brian Capaldo 2 , Stefan Bekiranov 2 , Aaron J. Mackey 3 , Mark R. Conaway 3 , Emanuel F. Petricoin 4 , Daniel Gioeli 1 , Michael J. Weber 1 1 Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Cancer Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22908 USA 2 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22908 USA 3 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22908 USA 4 Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, School of Systems Biology, College of Science, George Mason University, Manassas, VA 20110, USA Correspondence to: Michael J. Weber, e-mail: mjw@virginia.edu Keywords: melanoma, therapeutic resistance, cell signaling, BRAF, MAP Kinase Received: August 20, 2015 Accepted: November 21, 2015 Published: December 10, 2015 ABSTRACT Over half of BRAFV600E melanomas display intrinsic resistance to BRAF inhibitors, in part due to adaptive signaling responses. In this communication we ask whether BRAFV600E melanomas share common adaptive responses to BRAF inhibition that can provide clinically relevant targets for drug combinations. We screened a panel of 12 treatment-naive BRAFV600E melanoma cell lines with MAP Kinase pathway inhibitors in pairwise combination with 58 signaling inhibitors, assaying for synergistic cytotoxicity. We found enormous diversity in the drug combinations that showed synergy, with no two cell lines having an identical profile. Although the 6 lines most resistant to BRAF inhibition showed synergistic benefit from combination with lapatinib, the signaling mechanisms by which this combination generated synergistic cytotoxicity differed between the cell lines. We conclude that adaptive responses to inhibition of the primary oncogenic driver (BRAFV600E) are determined not only by the primary oncogenic driver but also by diverse secondary genetic and epigenetic changes (“back-seat drivers”) and hence optimal drug combinations will be variable. Because upregulation of receptor tyrosine kinases is a major source of drug resistance arising from diverse adaptive responses, we propose that inhibitors of these receptors may have substantial clinical utility in combination with inhibitors of the MAP Kinase pathway.

Background. In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), resistance to single-agent targeted therapy may be overcome by co-targeting of compensatory signaling pathways. Methods. A targeted drug screen with 120 combinations was used on 9 HNSCC cell lines. Results. Multiple novel drug combinations demonstrated synergistic growth inhibition. Combining the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) inhibitor, BMS754807, with either the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-family inhibitor, BMS599626, or the Src-family kinase inhibitor, dasatinib, resulted in substantial synergy and growth inhibition. Depending on the cell line, these combinations induced syner- gistic or additive apoptosis; when synergistic apoptosis was observed, AKT phosphorylation was inhibited to a greater extent than either drug alone. Conversely, when additive apoptosis occurred, AKT phosphoryla- tion was not reduced by the drug combination. Conclusion. Combined IGF-1R/HER family and IGF-1R/Src family inhibi- tion may have therapeutic potential in HNSCC. AKT may be a node of convergence between IGF-1R signaling and pathways that compensate for IGF-1R inhibition. V C 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 00: 000- 000, 2014

The androgen receptor (AR) is a critical oncogene in prostate cancer (PCa) development and progression. In this study, we demonstrate cell-cycle-dependent regulation of AR activity, localization, and phosphorylation. We show that for three AR-target genes, androgen-stimulated AR transactivation is highest during the G1 phase, decreased during S-phase, and abrogated during G2/M. This change in AR transactivation parallels changes in AR localization and phosphorylation. A combination of imaging techniques and quantitative analysis reveals nuclear AR localization during interphase and the exclusion of the majority, but not all, AR from chromatin during mitosis. Flow cytometry analyses using a phospho-S308 AR-specific antibody in asynchronous and chemically enriched G2/M PCa cells revealed ligand-independent induction of S308 phosphorylation in mitosis when CDK1 is activated. Consistent with our flow cytometry data, IP-western blotting revealed an increase in S308 phosphorylation in G2/M, and the results of anin vitrokinase assay indicated that CDK1 was able to phosphorylate the AR on S308. Pharmacological inhibition of CDK1 activity resulted in decreased S308 phosphorylation in PCa cells. Importantly, using a combination of anti-total AR and phospho-S308-specific antibodies in immunofluorescence experiments, we showed that the AR is excluded from condensed chromatin in mitotic cells when it was phosphorylated on S308. In summary, we show that the phosphorylation of the AR on S308 by CDK1 during mitosis regulates AR localization and correlates with changes inARtranscriptional activity. These findings have important implications for understanding the function ofARas an oncogene.

Background The mesenchymal phenotype in glioblastoma (GBM) and other cancers drives aggressiveness and treatment resistance, leading to therapeutic failure and recurrence of disease. Currently, there is no successful treatment option available against the mesenchymal phenotype. Methods We classified patient-derived GBM stem cell lines into 3 subtypes: proneural, mesenchymal, and other/classical. Each subtype's response to the inhibition of diacylglycerol kinase alpha (DGKα) was compared both in vitro and in vivo. RhoA activation, liposome binding, immunoblot, and kinase assays were utilized to elucidate the novel link between DGKα and geranylgeranyltransferase I (GGTase I). Results Here we show that inhibition of DGKα with a small-molecule inhibitor, ritanserin, or RNA interference preferentially targets the mesenchymal subtype of GBM. We show that the mesenchymal phenotype creates the sensitivity to DGKα inhibition; shifting GBM cells from the proneural to the mesenchymal subtype increases ritanserin activity, with similar effects in epithelial-mesenchymal transition models of lung and pancreatic carcinoma. This enhanced sensitivity of mesenchymal cancer cells to ritanserin is through inhibition of GGTase I and downstream mediators previously associated with the mesenchymal cancer phenotype, including RhoA and nuclear factor-kappaB. DGKα inhibition is synergistic with both radiation and imatinib, a drug preferentially affecting proneural GBM. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that a DGKα-GGTase I pathway can be targeted to combat the treatment-resistant mesenchymal cancer phenotype. Combining therapies with greater activity against each GBM subtype may represent a viable therapeutic option against GBM.

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-regulated transcription factor that belongs to the family of nuclear receptors. In addition to regulation by steroid, the AR is also regulated by post-translational modifications generated by signal transduction pathways. Thus, the AR functions not only as a transcription factor but also as a node that integrates multiple extracellular signals. The AR plays an important role in many diseases, including complete androgen insensitivity syndrome, spinal bulbar muscular atrophy, prostate and breast cancer, etc. In the case of prostate cancer, dependence on AR signaling has been exploited for therapeutic intervention for decades. However, the effectiveness of these therapies is limited in advanced disease due to restoration of AR signaling. Greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in AR action will enable the development of improved therapeutics to treat the wide range of AR-dependent diseases. The AR is subject to regulation by a number of kinases through post-translational modifications on serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues. In this paper, we review the AR phosphorylation sites, the kinases responsible for these phosphorylations, as well as the biological context and the functional consequences of these phosphorylations. Finally, what is known about the state of AR phosphorylation in clinical samples is discussed.

// Mark Axelrod 1 , Vicki L. Gordon 1 , Mark Conaway 2 , Adel Tarcsafalvi 1,3 , Daniel J. Neitzke 1,4 , Daniel Gioeli 1 , and Michael J. Weber 1 1 Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Cancer Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA 2 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA 3 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA 4 Medical Scientist Training Program, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA Correspondence: Michael J. Weber, email: // Keywords : Targeted therapies, Compensatory signaling, Pathway interactions, Crosstalk, Feedback inhibition Received : March 15, 2013 Accepted : April 9, 2013 Published : April 10, 2013 Abstract Constitutively activated signaling molecules are often the primary drivers of malignancy, and are favored targets for therapeutic intervention. However, the effectiveness of targeted inhibition of cell signaling can be blunted by compensatory signaling which generates adaptive resistance mechanisms and reduces therapeutic responses. Therefore, it is important to identify and target these compensatory pathways with combinations of targeted agents to achieve durable clinical benefit. In this report, we demonstrate the use of high-throughput combinatorial drug screening as a discovery tool to identify compensatory pathways that generate resistance to the cytotoxic effects of targeted therapy. We screened 420 drug combinations in 14 different cell lines representing three cancer lineages, and assessed the ability of each combination to cause synergistic cytotoxicity. Drug substitution studies were used to validate the functionally important drug targets. Of the 84 combinations that caused robust synergy in multiple cell lines, none were synergistic in more than half of the lines tested, and we observed no pattern of lineage specificity in the observed synergies. This reflects the plasticity of cell signaling networks, even among cell lines of the same tissue of origin. Mechanistic analysis of one novel synergistic combination identified in the screen, the multi-kinase inhibitor Ro31-8220 and lapatinib, demonstrated compensatory crosstalk between the p70S6 kinase and EGF receptor pathways. In addition, we identified BAD as a node of convergence between these two pathways that may be playing a role in the enhanced apoptosis observed upon combination treatment.

Recent data show that extracellular signals are transmitted through a network of proteins rather than hierarchical signaling pathways, suggesting that the inhibition of a single component of a canonical pathway is insufficient for the treatment of cancer. The biologic outcome of signaling through a network is inherently more robust and resistant to inhibition of a single network component. In this study, we conducted a functional chemical genetic screen to identify novel interactions between signaling inhibitors that would not be predicted on the basis of our current understanding of signaling networks. We screened over 300 drug combinations in nine melanoma cell lines and have identified pairs of compounds that show synergistic cytotoxicity. The synergistic cytotoxicities identified did not correlate with the known RAS and BRAF mutational status of the melanoma cell lines. Among the most robust results was synergy between sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor with activity against RAF, and diclofenac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). Drug substitution experiments using the NSAIDs celecoxib and ibuprofen or the MAP–ERK kinase inhibitor PD325901 and the RAF inhibitor RAF265 suggest that inhibition of COX and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling are targets for the synergistic cytotoxicity of sorafenib and diclofenac. Cotreatment with sorafenib and diclofenac interrupts a positive feedback signaling loop involving extracellular signal–regulated kinase, cellular phospholipase A2, and COX. Genome-wide expression profiling shows synergy-specific downregulation of survival-related genes. This study has uncovered novel functional drug combinations and suggests that the underlying signaling networks that control responses to targeted agents can vary substantially, depending on unexplored components of the cell genotype. Mol Cancer Ther; 11(11); 2505–15. ©2012 AACR.

Regulation of the androgen receptor (AR) by its cognate ligand is well established, but how post-translational modification modulates AR activity is only emerging. The AR is subject to modification by phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, SUMOylation, and ubiquitination. As several of the enzymes that modify the AR are altered in prostate cancer, defining the context and physiological effects of these modifications could provide insight into mechanisms that underpin human disease. Here, we review how post-translational modification contributes to AR function as a transcription factor with particular emphasis on phosphorylation and dephosphorylation mechanisms.

Targeted therapies have often given disappointing results when used as single agents in solid tumors, suggesting the importance of devising rational combinations of targeted drugs. We hypothesized that construction of such combinations could be guided by identification of growth and survival pathways whose activity or expression become upregulated in response to single-agent drug treatment. We mapped alterations in signaling pathways assessed by gene array and protein phosphorylation to identify compensatory signal transduction pathways in prostate cancer xenografts treated with a MAP/ERK kinase (MEK) inhibitor PD325901. In addition to numerous components of the extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway, components of the IKK, hedgehog, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt/mTOR pathways were upregulated following treatment with PD325901. Combinations of PD325901 with inhibitors of any one of these upregulated pathways provided synergistically greater growth inhibition of in vitro cell growth and survival than the individual drugs alone. Thus, the identification of compensatory signal transduction pathways paves the way for rational combinatorial therapies for the effective treatment of prostate cancer. Mol Cancer Ther; 10(9); 1581–90. ©2011 AACR.

Previously we determined that S81 is the highest stoichiometric phosphorylation on the androgen receptor (AR) in response to hormone. To explore the role of this phosphorylation on growth, we stably expressed wild-type and S81A mutant AR in LHS and LAPC4 cells. The cells with increased wild-type AR expression grow faster compared with parental cells and S81A mutant-expressing cells, indicating that loss of S81 phosphorylation limits cell growth. To explore how S81 regulates cell growth, we tested whether S81 phosphorylation regulates AR transcriptional activity. LHS cells stably expressing wild-type and S81A mutant AR showed differences in the regulation of endogenous AR target genes, suggesting that S81 phosphorylation regulates promoter selectivity. We next sought to identify the S81 kinase using ion trap mass spectrometry to analyze AR-associated proteins in immunoprecipitates from cells. We observed cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)9 association with the AR. CDK9 phosphorylates the AR on S81 in vitro. Phosphorylation is specific to S81 because CDK9 did not phosphorylate the AR on other serine phosphorylation sites. Overexpression of CDK9 with its cognate cyclin, Cyclin T, increased S81 phosphorylation levels in cells. Small interfering RNA knockdown of CDK9 protein levels decreased hormone-induced S81 phosphorylation. Additionally, treatment of LNCaP cells with the CDK9 inhibitors, 5,6-dichloro-1-β-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole and Flavopiridol, reduced S81 phosphorylation further, suggesting that CDK9 regulates S81 phosphorylation. Pharmacological inhibition of CDK9 also resulted in decreased AR transcription in LNCaP cells. Collectively these results suggest that CDK9 phosphorylation of AR S81 is an important step in regulating AR transcriptional activity and prostate cancer cell growth.

BACKGROUND: Despite the known growth-promoting role of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown low efficacy in this disease. The insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) has been shown to induce resistance to EGFR TKIs in HNSCC predominantly through anti-apoptotic pathways. PRAS40 is an inhibitor of mTOR that ceases inhibition upon phosphorylation by Akt. Phosphorylated PRAS40 in turn inhibits FOXO3a, contributing to an overall pro-survival state. This study evaluates the role of PRAS40 in IGF-1R mediated resistance to EGFR TKIs. METHODS: In vitro experiments using alamarBlue, CyQuant, reverse phase protein microarray (RPPA), and immunoblot techniques to evaluate protein expression/phosphorylation and correlate with cell physiologic behavior. RESULTS: Proliferation assays were used to separate 6 HNSCC cell lines into 2 groups: those rescued from EGFR inhibition by IGF-1R activation and those not rescued. RPPA analysis identified a correlation between PRAS40 phosphorylation and rescue status. Immunoblot analysis confirmed the RPPA findings: in rescued cell lines, PRAS40 phosphorylation decreases with EGFR inhibition, but phosphorylation is restored by IGF-1R activation. However, these treatments have little effect on PRAS40 phosphorylation in non-rescued cell lines. In a representative cell line from each group, p70S6K phosphorylation was found to follow this pattern as well, suggesting possible involvement of mTOR in the rescue mechanism. However the addition of temsirolimus, an mTORC1 inhibitor, to treatment with an EGFR TKI was not sufficient to overcome IGF-induced rescue. CONCLUSIONS: PRAS40 phosphorylation is tightly correlated with IGF1R activation in HNSCC cells that exhibit IGF1R-induced rescue from EGFR TKI treatment. This phenomenon is absent in non-rescued cells, suggesting a potential role for pPRAS40 in IGF1R-based therapeutic resistance. While PRAS40 phosphorylation results in mTOR activation, the inability of mTOR inhibition to overcome IGF-induced rescue from EGFR antagonism suggests an important alternative downstream pathway. One possible mechanism is through inhibition of FOXO3a, a function of pPRAS40 that has been previously reported in other cell types. Citation Format: Michael I. Dougherty, Christine E. Lehman, Rolando E. Mendez, Linnea E. Taniguchi, Julie Wulfkuhle, Emanuel F. Petricoin, Daniel G. Gioeli, Mark J. Jameson. PRAS40 as a mediator of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor-induced resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition in head and neck cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1829.

Prostate cancer remains the most diagnosed cancer among men in the United States behind skin cancer, and advanced prostate cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths, with a 5-year survival rate of 26%. Radiation is the standard of care for the treatment of prostate cancer at the early and late stages. Checkpoint kinase 2 (CHK2) is a serine/threonine protein kinase whose main function is regulating the DNA damage response (DDR) induced by ionizing radiation. The androgen receptor (AR) is a major driver of prostate cancer, even at the castration-resistant stage of the disease. The development of the second-generation anti-androgen enzalutamide, which is a selective AR antagonist, highlights the enduring importance of the AR. We have previously demonstrated that CHK2 is a critical negative regulator of prostate cancer cell growth, androgen sensitivity, and AR transcriptional activity. We have now uncovered novel molecular interactions between CHK2 and AR that provide mechanistic insight into our observation that CHK2 regulates prostate cancer growth. The AR directly interacts with CHK2, and that interaction increases with radiation. We found that the interaction of CHK2 and AR occurs at sites of DNA damage. The binding of CHK2 with AR can be disrupted with CHK2 kinase inhibitors suggesting that the kinase activity of CHK2 is required. This was verified using kinase-impaired CHK2 variants, including the K373E variant associated with 4.2% of prostate cancer. Furthermore, the radiation-induced increase in CHK2-AR interactions requires AR phosphorylation on both serine 81 and serine 308. Interestingly, CHK2-depletion in LNCaP cells increases ionizing radiation induced AR expression and DNA damage. Together, these data provide the rationale for targeting the CHK2-AR signaling axis to improve the effectiveness of prostate cancer therapies. The combination of CHK2 or CDK1 inhibitors with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiation shows an additive effect on the repression of tumor cell growth. Nearly every patient with disseminated prostate cancer will relapse following ADT and develop incurable castration-resistant prostate cancer. We have uncovered the molecular details of a signaling axis involving CHK2 and AR that, when perturbed in combination with ADT and/or ionizing radiation, effectively inhibits prostate cancer cell growth. This may enable resensitization of castration-resistant prostate cancer to the currently approved treatment options. Citation Format: Huy Q. Ta, Natalia Dworak, Rosalie Sleppy, Jeffery A. Allende, Daniel Gioeli. Translating the functional interactions of checkpoint kinase 2 and the androgen receptor into more effective therapies for the treatment of prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3747.

Activation of androgen receptor (AR) may have a role in the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Two intracellular tyrosine kinases, Ack1 (activated cdc42-associated kinase) and Src, phosphorylate and enhance AR activity and promote prostate xenograft tumor growth in castrated animals. However, the upstream signals that activate these kinases and lead to AR activation are incompletely characterized. In this study, we investigated AR phosphorylation in response to non-androgen ligand stimulation using phospho-specific antibodies. Treatment of LNCaP and LAPC-4 cells with epidermal growth factor (EGF), heregulin, Gas6 (ligand binding to the Mer receptor tyrosine kinase and activating Ack1 downstream), interleukin (IL)-6 or bombesin stimulated cell proliferation in the absence of androgen. Treatment of LNCaP and LAPC-4 cells with EGF, heregulin or Gas6 induced AR phosphorylation at Tyr-267, whereas IL-6 or bombesin treatment did not. AR phosphorylation at Tyr-534 was induced by treatment with EGF, IL-6 or bombesin, but not by heregulin or Gas6. Small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of Ack1 or Src showed that Ack1 mediates heregulin- and Gas6-induced AR Tyr-267 phosphorylation, whereas Src mediates Tyr-534 phosphorylation induced by EGF, IL-6 and bombesin. Dasatinib, a Src inhibitor, blocked EGF-induced Tyr-534 phosphorylation. In addition, we showed that dasatinib also inhibited Ack1 kinase. Dasatinib inhibited heregulin-induced Ack1 kinase activity and AR Tyr-267 phosphorylation. In addition, dasatinib inhibited heregulin-induced AR-dependent reporter activity. Dasatinib also inhibited heregulin-induced expression of endogenous AR target genes. Dasatinib inhibited Ack1-dependent colony formation and prostate xenograft tumor growth in castrated mice. Interestingly, Ack1 or Src knockdown or dasatinib did not inhibit EGF-induced AR Tyr-267 phosphorylation or EGF-stimulated AR activity, suggesting the existence of an additional tyrosine kinase that phosphorylates AR at Tyr-267. These data suggest that specific tyrosine kinases phosphorylate AR at distinct sites and that dasatinib may exert antitumor activity in prostate cancer through inhibition of Ack1.

The androgen receptor undergoes nuclear import in response to ligand, but the mechanism by which it undergoes nuclear export is poorly understood. We developed a permeabilized cell assay to characterize nuclear export of the androgen receptor in LNCaP prostate cancer cells. We found that nuclear export of endogenous androgen receptor can be stimulated by short double-stranded DNA oligonucleotides. This androgen receptor export pathway is dependent on ATP hydrolysis and is enhanced by phosphatase inhibition with okadaic acid. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching in permeabilized cells, under the conditions that stimulate androgen receptor export, suggested that double-stranded DNA-dependent export does not simply reflect the relief of a nuclear retention mechanism. A radiolabeled androgen was used to show that the androgen receptor remains ligand-bound during translocation through the nuclear pore complex. A specific inhibitor to the DNA-dependent protein kinase, NU7026, inhibits androgen receptor export and phosphorylation. In living cells, NU7026 treatment increases androgen-dependent transcription from endogenous genes that are regulated by androgen receptor. We suggest that DNA-dependent protein kinase phosphorylation of the androgen receptor, or an interacting component, helps target the androgen receptor for export from the nucleus.

INTRODUCTION—Prostate cancer (CaP) progression from an androgen-dependent to an androgen-independent state is associated with overexpression of EGFR family members or activation of their downstream signaling pathways, such as PI3K-Akt and MAPK. Although there are data implicating PI3K-Akt or MAPK pathway activation with resistance to EGFR inhibitors in CaP, the potential cross-talk between these pathways in response to EGFR or MAPK inhibitors remains to be examined. METHODS—Cross-talk between PTEN and MAPK signaling and its effects on CaP cell sensitivity to EGFR or MAPK inhibitors were examined in a PTEN-null C4-2 CaP cell, pTetOn PTEN C4-2, where PTEN expression was restored conditionally. RESULTS—Expression of PTEN in C4-2 cells exposed to EGF or serum was associated with increased phospho-ERK levels compared to cells without PTEN expression. Similar hypersensitivity of MAPK signaling was observed when cells were treated with a PI3K inhibitor LY294002. This enhanced sensitivity of MAPK signaling in PTEN-expressing cells was associated with a growth stimulatory effect in response to EGF. Furthermore, EGFR inhibitors gefitinib and lapatinib abrogated hypersensitivity of MAPK signaling and cooperated with PTEN expression to inhibit cell growth in both monolayer and anchorage-independent conditions. Similar cooperative growth inhibition was observed when cells were treated with the MEK inhibitor, CI1040, in combination with PTEN expression suggesting that inhibition of MAPK signaling could mediate the cooperation of EGFR inhibitors with PTEN expression. CONCLUSIONS—Our results suggest that signaling cross-talk between the PI3K-Akt and MAPK pathways occurs in CaP cells, highlighting the potential benefit of targeting both the PI3K-Akt and MAPK pathways in CaP treatment.

Although the steady-state distribution of the androgen receptor (AR) is predominantly nuclear in androgen-treated cells, androgen-bound AR shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. In the present study we have addressed how nucleocytoplasmic shuttling contributes to the regulation of AR. Nuclear transport signal fusions were used to force AR localization to the nucleus or cytoplasm of prostate cancer cells, and the effect of localization on shuttling, transcription, androgen binding, and phosphorylation was determined. Fusing the simian virus 40 nuclear localization signal or c-Abl nuclear export signal to AR resulted in androgen-independent localization to the nucleus or cytoplasm, respectively. AR forced to the nucleus was transcriptionally active on prostate-specific antigen and mouse mammary tumor virus promoters driving reporter genes. AR forced to the cytoplasm was largely inactive on the prostate-specific antigen promoter, but, surprisingly, AR was active on the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter and on two endogenous genes examined. Thus, highly transient nuclear localization of AR is sufficient to activate transcription. Androgen dissociation rates and the dissociation constant (KD) of AR for androgen were similar whether AR was localized to the cytoplasm or the nucleus, suggesting the ligand-binding cycle of AR is not strictly linked to its compartmentalization. Using phosphosite antibodies, we found that compartmentalization influences the phosphorylation state of AR. We show there is a bias for androgen-dependent phosphorylation of Ser81, Ser256, and Ser308 in the nucleus and androgen-independent phosphorylation of Ser94 in the cytoplasm. We propose that one function of nucleocytoplasmic shuttling is to integrate the signaling environment in the cytoplasm with AR activity in the nucleus.

BACKGROUND Progression of prostate cancer to a fatal androgen-independent disease is associated with activation of MAP kinase, consistent with chronic stimulation of the Ras-signaling pathway. We have previously shown that Ras activation is sufficient to induce androgen-independent growth of prostate cancer cells. One mechanism of MAP kinase regulation is modulation of Ras signaling by other Ras family members, the Rap gene paralogs Rap1a/b and Rap2a/b. Here we ask if Rap proteins play a role in determining androgen sensitivity of human prostate cancer cells either alone or in the context of an activated Ras. METHODS To evaluate the role of Rap proteins in androgen responsiveness we use Rap over-expression with or without mutated Ras co-transfection and Rap siRNA knockdown to evaluate androgen-dependent prostate-specific antigen (PSA) promoter reporter expression and cell growth in androgen-dependent LNCaP and independent C4-2 human prostate cancer cells. RESULTS Rap1 is equally expressed between LNCaP and C4-2 cells and thus we focused on Rap2 which is minimally expressed in C4-2. Rap2a affects androgen-dependent PSA reporter expression in a dose-dependent manner in LNCaP and C4-2 cells. Low levels of Rap2a enhance PSA reporter expression, whereas higher concentrations inhibit expression. We show that Rap2a antagonizes the enhanced PSA reporter expression conferred by an active RasV12 gene in prostate cancer cells. siRNA knockdown data indicate that Rap2 has a greater effect on androgen-stimulated growth in LNCaP than in C4-2 cells. CONCLUSIONS We show that Rap2 is involved in androgen-mediated transcriptional and growth responses of human prostate cancer cells. Prostate 67: 1590–1599, 2007. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Steroid hormone receptors (SRs) are ligand-activated transcription factors and sensors for growth factor–initiated signaling pathways in hormonally regulated tissues, such as the breast or prostate. Recent discoveries suggest that several protein kinases are rapidly activated in response to steroid hormone binding to cytoplasmic SRs. Induction of rapid signaling upon SR ligand binding ensures that receptors and coregulators are appropriately phosphorylated as part of optimal transcription complexes. Alternatively, SR-activated kinase cascades provide additional avenues for SR-regulated gene expression independent of SR nuclear action. We provide an overview of SR and signaling cross talk in breast and prostate cancers, using the human progesterone receptor (PR) and androgen receptor (AR) as models. Kinases are emerging as key mediators of SR action. Cross talk between SR and membrane-initiated signaling events suggests a mechanism for coordinate regulation of gene subsets by mitogenic stimuli in hormonally responsive normal tissues; such cross talk is suspected to contribute to cancer biology.

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in American men, and curing metastatic disease remains a significant challenge. Nearly all patients with disseminated prostate cancer initially respond to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), but virtually all patients will relapse and develop incurable castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). A high-throughput RNAi screen to identify signaling pathways regulating prostate cancer cell growth led to our discovery that checkpoint kinase 2 (CHK2) knockdown dramatically increased prostate cancer growth and hypersensitized cells to low androgen levels. Mechanistic investigations revealed that the effects of CHK2 were dependent on the downstream signaling proteins CDC25C and CDK1. Moreover, CHK2 depletion increased androgen receptor (AR) transcriptional activity on androgen-regulated genes, substantiating the finding that CHK2 affects prostate cancer proliferation, partly, through the AR. Remarkably, we further show that CHK2 is a novel AR-repressed gene, suggestive of a negative feedback loop between CHK2 and AR. In addition, we provide evidence that CHK2 physically associates with the AR and that cell-cycle inhibition increased this association. Finally, IHC analysis of CHK2 in prostate cancer patient samples demonstrated a decrease in CHK2 expression in high-grade tumors. In conclusion, we propose that CHK2 is a negative regulator of androgen sensitivity and prostate cancer growth, and that CHK2 signaling is lost during prostate cancer progression to castration resistance. Thus, perturbing CHK2 signaling may offer a new therapeutic approach for sensitizing CRPC to ADT and radiation. Cancer Res; 75(23); 5093–105. ©2015 AACR.

The androgen receptor (AR) remains functionally important in the development and progression of prostate cancer even when the disease seems androgen “independent.” Because signal transduction by growth factor receptors increases in advanced prostate cancer and is capable of sensitizing the AR to androgen, there is considerable interest in determining the mechanisms by which signaling systems can modulate AR function. We show herein that the adaptor/scaffolding protein receptor for activated C kinase 1 (RACK1), which was previously reported to interact with the AR, modulates the tyrosine phosphorylation of AR and its interaction with the Src tyrosine kinase. We also show that down-regulation of RACK1 by short interfering RNA inhibits growth and stimulates prostate-specific antigen transcription in androgen-treated prostate cancer cells. Our results suggest that RACK1 mediates the cross-talk of AR with additional binding partners, such as Src, and facilitates the tyrosine phosphorylation and transcriptional activity of the AR. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(22): 11047-54)

The androgen receptor (AR) regulates ligand-dependent gene transcription upon binding specific DNA sequences. The AR conveys both trans-activation and trans-repression functions, which together contribute to prostate cellular growth, differentiation, and apoptosis. Like histone H3, the AR is post-translationally modified by both acetylation and phosphorylation. The histone acetyltransferase p300 transactivates the AR and directly acetylates the AR in vitro at a conserved motif. Point mutations of the AR acetylation motif that abrogate acetylation reduce trans-activation by p300 without affecting the trans-repression function of the AR. The current studies assessed the functional relationship between acetylation and phosphorylation of the AR. Herein trans-activation of the AR acetylation site mutants were enhanced by the p42/p44 MAPK pathway but were defective in regulation by protein kinase A (PKA) signaling. PKA inhibition augmented ARwt activity but not AR acetylation mutant gene reporter activity and association at an androgen response element in chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. Mutations of the lysine residues at the AR acetylation site reduced trichostatin A (TSA) responsiveness and ligand-induced phosphorylation of the AR. The AR acetylation site mutant formed ligand-induced phosphorylation-dependent isoforms with distinguishable characteristics from wild type AR as determined with two-dimensional electrophoresis. Conversely, point mutation of a subset of AR phosphorylation sites reduced trichostatin A responsiveness and trans-activation by histone acetyltransferases. Together these studies suggest that acetylation and phosphorylation of the AR are linked events and that the conserved AR lysine motif contributes to a select subset of pathways governing AR activity.

Here we report that mutations within the DNA-binding domain of AR, shown previously to inhibit nuclear export to the cytoplasm, cause an androgen-dependent defect in intranuclear trafficking of AR. Mutation of two conserved phenylalanines within the DNA recognition helix (F582, 583A) results in androgen-dependent arrest of AR in multiple subnuclear foci. A point mutation in one of the conserved phenylalanines (DeltaF582, F582Y) is known to cause androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS). Both AIS mutants (DeltaF582, F582Y) and the export mutant (F582, 583A) displayed androgen-dependent arrest in foci, and all three mutants promoted androgen-dependent accumulation of the histone acetyl transferase CREB binding protein (CBP) in the foci. The foci correspond to a subnuclear compartment that is highly enriched for the steroid receptor coactivator glucocorticoid receptor-interacting protein (GRIP)-1. Agonist-bound wild-type AR induces the redistribution of GRIP-1 from foci to the nucleoplasm. This likely reflects a direct interaction between these proteins because mutation of a conserved residue within the major coactivator binding site on AR (K720A) inhibits AR-dependent dissociation of GRIP-1 from foci. GRIP-1 also remains foci-associated in the presence of agonist-bound F582, 583A, DeltaF582, or F582Y forms of AR. Two-dimensional phospho-peptide mapping and analysis with a phospho-specific antibody revealed that mutant forms of AR that arrest in the subnuclear foci are hypophosphorylated at Ser81, a site that normally undergoes androgen-dependent phosphorylation. Our working model is that the subnuclear foci are sites where AR undergoes ligand-dependent engagement with GRIP-1 and CBP, a recruitment step that occurs before Ser81 phosphorylation and association with promoters of target genes.

When prostate cancer is first detected it generally is dependent on the presence of androgens for growth, and responds to androgen ablation therapies. However, the disease often recurs in a disseminated and apparently androgen independent (AI) form, and in this state is almost invariably fatal. Considerable evidence indicates that the Androgen receptor (AR) continues to be required even in androgen independent (AI) disease. Thus, a key to understanding hormone independent prostate cancer is to determine the mechanism(s) by which the AR can function even in the absence of physiologic levels of androgen. In this article, we argue that growth factors and receptors that utilize Ras family members drive prostate cancer progression to a state of androgen hypersensitivity; and that post-translational modifications (e.g., phosphorylations) of transcriptional cofactors might be responsible for modulating the function of the AR so that it is active even at low concentrations of androgen.

Activation of signal transduction kinase cascades has been shown to alter androgen receptor (AR) activity. Although it has been suggested that changes in AR phosphorylation might be directly responsible, the basal and regulated phosphorylations of the AR have not been fully determined. We have identified the major sites of AR phosphorylation on ARs expressed in COS-1 cells using a combination of peptide mapping, Edman degradation, and mass spectrometry. We describe the identification of seven AR phosphorylation sites, show that the phosphopeptides seen with exogenously expressed ARs are highly similar to those seen with endogenous ARs in LNCaP cells and show that specific agonists differentially regulate the phosphorylation state of endogenous ARs in LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Treatment of LNCaP cells with the synthetic androgen, R1881, elevates phosphorylation of serines 16, 81, 256, 308, 424, and 650. Ser-94 appears constitutively phosphorylated. Forskolin, epidermal growth factor, and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate increase the phosphorylation of Ser-650. The kinetics of phosphorylation of most sites in response to hormone or forskolin is temporally delayed, reaching a maximum at 2 h post-stimulation. The exception is Ser-81, which continues to display increasing phosphorylation at 6 h. These data provide a basis for analyzing mechanisms of cross-talk between growth factor signaling and androgen in prostate development, physiology, and cancer.

The development of drugs to treat cancer is severely hampered by the inefficiency of translating pre-clinical in vitro and mouse studies into clinical benefit. Over 90% of drugs that progress through pre-clinical studies fail in human trials. Therefore, there is a critical need to improve the accuracy of evaluating pre-clinical drug efficacy through the development of more physiologically relevant human models. This is especially the case for pancreatic cancer, the 4th leading cause of cancer deaths with a 5-year survival rate of Citation Format: Daniel G. Gioeli, Chelsi Snow, Michael Simmers, Robert Figler, J. Thomase Parsons, Stephen Hoang, Todd Bauer, Brian Wamhoff. Development of a human pancreatic tumor microenvironment system (TMeS) for evaluation of novel therapeutics [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4935. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4935

Diacylglycerol kinases (DGKs) are a family of highly conserved enzymes that are promiscuously responsive to growth factors and other mitogenic signaling cascades. DGKs are activated by binding of Ca2+ and phosphoserine, and catalyze conversion of diacylglycerol (DAG) to phosphatidic acid (PA). PA has multiple effects on downstream cellular signaling, while activated DGKs can associate with scaffolding proteins, or undergo degradation or translocation to the nucleus through atypical localization signals and thereby promote cell division and survival. A repurposed small-molecule inhibitor of DGKα activity is shown here to antagonize tumor growth in xenografts of primary and metastatic brain tumors and syngeneic mouse tumor grafts. Based on recent prior research and in this work in xenograft models, DGKα inhibition may arrest or kill tumors through cancer addiction to DGKα activity. Here, in syngeneic tumor models of primary and metastatic brain tumors, an additional anti-tumor effect of DGKα inhibition via up-regulation of normal immune function is possibly present. This work uses two syngeneic in vivo tumor models to compare DGKα inhibition with the monoclonal antibody immunotherapy anti-CTLA-4, and also tests the effect of combination of the two treatments on survival, tumor size, and immunologic activity. The anti-tumor activity of the DGKα inhibitor and the contribution of other DGK family members is shown using cell-based toxicity and flow cytometry assays. Direct interaction between the inhibitor and DGKα is shown with biochemical reconstitution of inhibitor-enzyme interactions These early results suggest that DGKα inhibition may be a promising strategy for patients with glioblastoma and melanoma brain metastasis.

It is increasingly clear that Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer is dependent on the Androgen Receptor. This has led to the use of anti-androgen therapies that reduce endogenous steroid hormone production as well as the use of androgen receptor antagonists. However, the androgen receptor does not act in isolation and integrates with a milieu of cell signaling proteins to affect cell biology. It is well established that cancer is a genetic disease resulting from the accumulation of mutations and chromosomal translocations that enables cancer cells to survive, proliferate, and disseminate. To maintain genomic integrity, there exists conserved checkpoint signaling pathways to facilitate cell cycle delay, DNA repair, and/or apoptosis in response to DNA damage. The androgen receptor interacts with, affects, and is affected by these DNA damage response proteins. This review will focus on the connections between checkpoint signaling and the androgen receptor in prostate cancer. We will describe what is known about how components of checkpoint signaling regulate androgen receptor activity and what questions still face the field.

Therapies targeting oncogenic drivers rapidly induce compensatory adaptive responses that blunt drug effectiveness, contributing to therapeutic resistance. Adaptive responses are characteristic of robust cell signaling networks, and thus there is increasing interest in drug combinations that co-target the driver and the adaptive response. An alternative approach to co-inhibiting oncogenic and adaptive targets is to identify a critical node where the activities of these targets converge. Nodes of convergence between signaling modules represent potential therapeutic vulnerabilities because their inhibition could result in the collapse of the network, leading to enhanced cytotoxicity. In this report we demonstrate that p70S6 kinase (p70S6K) can function as a critical node linking HER-family and phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway signaling. We used high-throughput combinatorial drug screening to identify adaptive survival responses to targeted therapies, and found that HER-family and PI3K represented compensatory signaling pathways. Co-targeting these pathways with drug combinations caused synergistic cytotoxicity in cases where inhibition of neither target was effective as a monotherapy. We utilized Reverse Phase Protein Arrays and determined that phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 was synergistically down-regulated upon HER-family and PI3K/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) co-inhibition. Expression of constitutively active p70S6K protected against apoptosis induced by combined HER-family and PI3K/mTOR inhibition. Direct inhibition of p70S6K with small molecule inhibitors phenocopied HER-family and PI3K/mTOR co-inhibition. These data implicate p70S6K as a critical node in the HER-family/PI3K signaling network. The ability of direct inhibitors of p70S6K to phenocopy co-inhibition of two upstream signaling targets indicates that identification and targeting of critical nodes can overcome adaptive resistance to targeted therapies.

Using a series of tumorigenic and non-tumorigenic somatic cell hybrids that resulted from the fusion of the human osteosarcoma cell line OHS50-P16T (P16T) with the HeLa cell line D98OR, we investigated the role that genetic mutations, including alterations of oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, and chromosomes, play in P16T tumorigenicity. Analysis of a previously identified oncogene mutation, c-myc amplification, in the P16T cell line demonstrated that both the tumorigenic and non-tumorigenic hybrids contained the amplified c-myc gene. Analysis of previously identified P16T tumor suppressor gene alterations, p53 mutation, and loss of RB1 expression demonstrated that the mutated p53 gene was selectively maintained in both the non-tumorigenic and tumorigenic hybrids, whereas loss of RB1 expression was not maintained in either the non-tumorigenic or tumorigenic hybrids. Chromosomes 11, 13, 17, and 22 were analyzed for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) to characterize the status of these previously described chromosomal alterations in the tumorigenic and non-tumorigenic hybrids. Loss of HeLa D98OR chromosome 22, with maintenance of P16T chromosome 22, was observed in the tumorigenic hybrids, a result confirmed by LOH analysis, which demonstrated the specific loss of HeLa chromosome 22 genetic material in the tumorigenic segregants. Together, these results demonstrated that amplified c-myc, mutant p53, and RB1 genes seem to be important in osteosarcoma tumorigenicity and that an additional altered gene or genes on chromosome 22 may play a key role in osteosarcoma tumorigenicity.

Somatic cell genetic studies gave the first proof that functional tumor suppressor genes exist in mammalian genomes. Initial studies showed that whole-cell hybrids between tumorigenic mouse or human cell lines and their normal counterparts became nontumorigenic upon inoculation into animals. However, identification of the operative tumor suppressor gene proved difficult due to the presence of the entire chromosomal complement of the normal cell parent. The development of the technique of microcell hybridization has provided a powerful method for overcoming this obstacle. Suppression of transformed properties of a cancer cell line upon transfer of single human chromosomes from normal cells directly maps the location of tumor suppressor activity. One can then use positional cloning techniques or differential expression strategies to isolate the functional tumor suppressor gene. We present a general strategy for the mapping of tumor suppressor genes in mammalian cells. We also outline some of the important control experiments as well as pitfalls encountered in such studies.

Prostate cancer remains the second most common type of cancer and frequent cause of cancer-related mortality in American men. Even though many patients with metastatic prostate cancer will initially respond to androgen deprivation therapy, virtually all patients will relapse and develop lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are emerging as critical regulatory elements of many cellular biological processes, and there is increasing evidence demonstrating that dysregulation of lncRNAs is associated with many human cancers, including cancers of the prostate, breast, and lung. We have discovered in a high-throughput RNAi screen identifying regulators of prostate cancer cell growth that knockdown of lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (LCK) significantly decreases growth of prostate cancer cells in the presence and absence of androgen. Surprisingly, immunoprecipitation and western blot analyses show that LCK is not expressed at the protein level in prostate cancer cells. Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) and sequencing have revealed that a previously unannotated lncRNA lies within exon six and the 3’UTR of the LCK gene. While short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) targeting the carboxy-terminus of the LCK gene decreases cell growth, expression of shRNAs specific for the amino-terminus has no effect on growth. Furthermore, only quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) primers directed toward the 3’ section of the LCK gene yield detectable levels of transcript. These data provide further validation for the existence of a lncRNA within the LCK gene locus. Remarkably, the lncRNA situated within the LCK gene is dramatically upregulated in response to androgen. Therefore, we have labeled this lncRNA “HULLK” for Hormone-upregulated lncRNA within LCK. Cellular fractionation and qPCR show that HULLK predominantly localizes to the cytoplasm. In addition to the effects on prostate cancer cell growth, we have data that alludes to the increase in transcript levels of several Src family members following depletion of HULLK. Thus, these studies indicate that the LCK gene contains a lncRNA involved in the regulation of prostate cancer cell growth and perhaps transcription. While additional analyses will be required to fully characterize HULLK, our data suggest that it may serve as a novel regulator of prostate cancer proliferation. Citation Format: Huy Q. Ta, Samuel R. Jackson, Hilary Whitworth, Shriti Bhadel, Daniel Gioeli. Identification of a novel long noncoding RNA within the LCK gene locus that regulates prostate cancer cell growth. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 979.

As prostate cancer progresses to castration-resistant disease, there is an increase in signal transduction activity. Most castration-resistant prostate tumors continue to express the androgen receptor (AR) as well as androgen-responsive genes, despite the near absence of circulating androgen in these patients. The AR is regulated not only by its cognate steroid hormone, but also by interactions with a constellation of co-regulatory and signaling molecules. Thus, the elevated signaling activity that occurs during progression to castration resistance can affect prostate cancer cell growth either through the AR or independent of the AR. In order to identify signaling pathways that regulate prostate cancer cell growth, we screened a panel of shRNAs targeting 673 human kinases against LNCaP prostate cancer cells grown in the presence and absence of hormone. The screen identified multiple shRNA clones against known and novel gene targets that regulate prostate cancer cell growth. Based on the magnitude of effect on growth, we selected six kinases for further study: MAP3K11, DGKD, ICK, CIT, GALK2, and PSKH1. Knockdown of these kinases decreased cell growth in both androgen-dependent and castration-resistant prostate cancer cells. However, these kinases had different effects on basal or androgen-induced transcriptional activity of AR target genes. MAP3K11 knockdown most consistently altered transcription of AR target genes, suggesting that MAP3K11 affected its growth inhibitory effect by modulating the AR transcriptional program. Consistent with MAP3K11 acting on the AR, knockdown of MAP3K11 inhibited AR Ser 650 phosphorylation, further supporting stress kinase regulation of AR phosphorylation. This study demonstrates the applicability of lentiviral-based shRNA for conducting phenotypic screens and identifies MAP3K11, DGKD, ICK, CIT, GALK2, and PSKH1 as regulators of prostate cancer cell growth. The thorough evaluation of these kinase targets will pave the way for developing more effective treatments for castration-resistant prostate cancer.

The MST1 serine–threonine kinase, a component of the RASSF1-LATS tumor suppressor network, is involved in cell proliferation and apoptosis and has been implicated in cancer. However, the physiologic role of MST1 in prostate cancer (PCa) is not well understood. Here, we investigated the possibility of a biochemical and functional link between androgen receptor (AR) and MST1 signaling. We showed that MST1 forms a protein complex with AR and antagonizes AR transcriptional activity as shown by coimmunoprecipitation (co-IP), promoter reporter analysis, and molecular genetic methods. In vitro kinase and site-specific mutagenesis approaches indicate that MST1 is a potent AR kinase; however, the kinase activity of MST1 and its proapoptotic functions were shown not to be involved in inhibition of AR. MST1 was also found in AR–chromatin complexes, and enforced expression of MST1 reduced the binding of AR to a well-characterized, androgen-responsive region within the prostate-specific antigen promoter. MST1 suppressed PCa cell growth in vitro and tumor growth in mice. Because MST1 is also involved in regulating the AKT1 pathway, this kinase may be an important new link between androgenic and growth factor signaling and a novel therapeutic target in PCa. Cancer Res; 71(12); 4303–13. ©2011 AACR.

Molecular targeted therapies against signaling molecules that are active in ­cancer have shown only incomplete and temporary clinical benefit when used as single agents. One explanation for the limited clinical benefit is that extracellular signals are transmitted through a network of proteins rather than through hierarchical signaling pathways; a network inhibition of a single component is insufficient to have dramatic effects on the treatment of cancer since the biological outcome of signals propagated through a network is inherently more resistant to perturbations. In this chapter, we discuss the major mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapeutics using alterations in the cell signaling network. We present specific examples of redundant (intrinsic) and compensatory (acquired) signaling leading to resistance. These include the redundant mechanisms of (1) mutation in a downstream effector rendering inhibition of an upstream activator ineffective and (2) the presence of redundant signaling pathways regulating cancer cell growth as well as the compensatory resistance mechanisms including (3) the upregulation of a second signaling pathway which substitutes for the targeted pathway, and (4) loss of feedback control when inhibiting a downstream effector which facilitates activation of upstream components of the signaling pathway. We also discuss the general implications of the cell signaling network on resistance and the design of effective drug treatments.

Background Classical nuclear localization signal (NLS) dependent nuclear import is carried out by a heterodimer of importin α and importin β. NLS cargo is recognized by importin α, which is bound by importin β. Importin β mediates translocation of the complex through the central channel of the nuclear pore, and upon reaching the nucleus, RanGTP binding to importin β triggers disassembly of the complex. To date, six importin α family members, encoded by separate genes, have been described in humans. Results We sequenced and characterized a seventh member of the importin α family of transport factors, karyopherin α 7 (KPNA7), which is most closely related to KPNA2. The domain of KPNA7 that binds Importin β (IBB) is divergent, and shows stronger binding to importin β than the IBB domains from of other importin α family members. With regard to NLS recognition, KPNA7 binds to the retinoblastoma (RB) NLS to a similar degree as KPNA2, but it fails to bind the SV40-NLS and the human nucleoplasmin (NPM) NLS. KPNA7 shows a predominantly nuclear distribution under steady state conditions, which contrasts with KPNA2 which is primarily cytoplasmic. Conclusion KPNA7 is a novel importin α family member in humans that belongs to the importin α2 subfamily. KPNA7 shows different subcellular localization and NLS binding characteristics compared to other members of the importin α family. These properties suggest that KPNA7 could be specialized for interactions with select NLS-containing proteins, potentially impacting developmental regulation.

Prostate cancer progression to the androgen-independent (AI) state involves acquisition of pathways that allow tumor growth under low-androgen conditions. We hypothesized that expression of molecular chaperones that modulate androgen binding to AR might be altered in prostate cancer and contribute to progression to the AI state. Here, we report that the Hsp90 cochaperone FKBP51 is upregulated in LAPC-4 AI tumors grown in castrated mice and describe a molecular mechanism by which FKBP51 regulates AR activity. Using recombinant proteins, we show that FKBP51 stimulates recruitment of the cochaperone p23 to the ATP-bound form of Hsp90, forming an FKBP51-Hsp90-p23 superchaperone complex. In cells, FKBP51 expression promotes superchaperone complex association with AR and increases the number of AR molecules that undergo androgen binding. FKBP51 stimulates androgen-dependent transcription and cell growth, and FKBP51 is part of a positive feedback loop that is regulated by AR and androgen. Finally, depleting FKBP51 levels by short hairpin RNA reduces the transcript levels of genes regulated by AR and androgen. Because the superchaperone complex plays a critical role in determining the ligand-binding competence and transcription function of AR, it provides an attractive target for inhibiting AR activity in prostate cancer cells.

The acceptor sites for small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) are conserved in the N-terminal domains of several nuclear receptors. Here, we show that androgens induce rapid and dynamic conjugation of SUMO-1 to androgen receptor (AR). Nuclear import of AR is not sufficient for SUMOylation, because constitutively nuclear apo-ARs or antagonist-bound ARs are only very weakly modified by SUMO-1 in comparison with agonist-bound ARs. Of the SUMO-specific proteases (SENP)-1, -2, -3, -5, and -6, only SENP1 and SENP2 are efficient in cleaving AR-SUMO-1 conjugates in intact cells and in vitro. Both SENP1 and -2 are nuclear and found at sites proximal to AR. Their expression promotes AR-dependent transcription, but in a promoter-selective fashion. SENP1 and -2 stimulated the activity of holo-AR on compound androgen response element-containing promoters. The effects of SENP1 and -2 on AR-dependent transcription were dependent on catalytic activity and required intact SUMO acceptor sites in AR, indicating that their coactivating effects are mainly due to their direct isopeptidase activity on holo-AR. In prostate cancer cells, ectopic expression of SENP1, but not that of SENP2, increased the transcription activity of endogenous AR. Silencing of SENP1 attenuated the expression of several AR target genes and blunted androgen-stimulated growth of LNCaP cells. Our results indicate that SENP1 reverses the ligand-induced SUMOylation of AR and helps fine tune the cellular responses to androgens in a target promoter-selective manner.

Prostate cancer (PC) initially appears as an androgen-dependent disease but progresses to one that is refractory to hormone ablation therapy. Substantial evidence suggests that autocrine and paracrine growth factor loops fuel PC progression to hormone independence: (1) overexpression of numerous growth factors and their cognate receptors correlates with PC progression; (2) ectopic overexpression of some receptors can drive hormone-independent growth; and (3) neuroendocrine (NE)-like cells that produce growth-regulatory

Ruthenium(II) tris(bipyridine)-centered poly(ethylenimine) (Ru PEI) was synthesized via acid hydrolysis of Ru tris(bipyridine)-centered poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (Ru PEOX), and the luminescence, DNA entrapment, and transfection efficiencies were evaluated. Emission maxima for Ru PEI samples are red-shifted compared to Ru PEOX precursors, and the luminescence lifetimes are shorter in both methanol and aqueous solutions. Slower oxygen quenching of Ru PEOX and Ru PEI luminescence versus [Ru(bpy)3]Cl2 (bpy = bipyridine) is attributed to polymer shielding effects. Ru PEI luminescence is similar in the presence and absence of DNA. Ru PEI (7900 Da) and linear PEI (L-PEI; 22,000 Da) fully entrapped DNA (5.4 kb; pcDNA) at an N/P ratio of 2. LNCaP prostate cancer cells were transfected with a plasmid encoding for green fluorescent protein using Ru PEI and L-PEI vectors for comparison. For N/P = 48, the transfection efficiency for Ru PEI was approximately 50% relative to that of L-PEI.

Fifty percent of cutaneous melanomas are driven by activated BRAF V600E, but tumors treated with RAF inhibitors, even when they respond dramatically, rapidly adapt and develop resistance. Thus, there is a pressing need to identify the major mechanisms of intrinsic and adaptive resistance and develop drug combinations that target these resistance mechanisms. In a combinatorial drug screen on a panel of 12 treatment-naïve BRAF V600E mutant melanoma cell lines of varying levels of resistance to mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway inhibition, we identified the combination of PLX4720, a targeted inhibitor of mutated BRaf, and lapatinib, an inhibitor of the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases, as synergistically cytotoxic in the subset of cell lines that displayed the most resistance to PLX4720. To identify potential mechanisms of resistance to PLX4720 treatment and synergy with lapatinib treatment, we performed a multi-platform functional genomics analysis to profile the genome as well as the transcriptional and proteomic responses of these cell lines to treatment with PLX4720. We found modest levels of resistance correlated with the zygosity of the BRAF V600E allele and receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) mutational status. Layered over base-line resistance was substantial upregulation of many ErbB pathway genes in response to BRaf inhibition, thus generating the vulnerability to combination with lapatinib. The transcriptional responses of ErbB pathway genes are associated with a number of transcription factors, including ETS2 and its associated cofactors that represent a convergent regulatory mechanism conferring synergistic drug susceptibility in the context of diverse mutational landscapes.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer death in American men, and the cure for metastatic disease remains a significant challenge. While nearly all patients with disseminated PCa initially respond to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), virtually every patient will relapse and develop incurable castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathways continue to play a crucial role in CRPC progression. Previous studies have shown that signal transduction pathways can stimulate AR activation, suggesting that the ability of signaling cascades to influence AR function may have a significant role in CRPC progression, and that CRPC may not be effectively treated by ligand-directed therapy alone. A high-throughput RNAi screen identifying signaling pathways that regulate PCa cell growth led to our discovery that knockdown of Checkpoint Kinase 2 (CHK2) dramatically increased PCa proliferation in the presence and absence of androgen. Furthermore, CHK2 depletion hypersensitized cells to castrate androgen levels. These CHK2-mediated effects on growth were dependent on the downstream signaling proteins CDC25C and CDK1 and could be blocked by the AR antagonist MDV3100. Immunohistochemical analysis of CHK2 in patient samples demonstrated that reduced CHK2 expression significantly correlated with increased Gleason score indicating the clinical relevance of CHK2 in PCa. Moreover, CHK2 expression is lower in castration-resistant C4-2 and CWR22Rv1 cells compared to androgen-sensitive LNCaP cells consistent with loss of CHK2 expression during PCa progression. CHK2 depletion increased AR transcriptional activity on both androgen-activated and androgen-repressed genes, substantiating that CHK2 affects PCa growth through the AR. Remarkably, quantitative PCR, chromatin immunoprecipitation, and western blot analyses revealed that CHK2 is a novel AR-repressed gene, suggesting a negative feedback loop between CHK2 and the AR. Furthermore, we show that CHK2 physically associates with the AR, and that cellular stress, such as DNA damage and serum starvation, increases this association. Based on these data, we propose that CHK2 is a negative regulator of androgen sensitivity and PCa growth. Thus, alterations to CHK2 signaling may sensitize CRPC to ADT and radiation. Citation Format: Huy Q. Ta, Melissa L. Ivey, Henry F. Frierson, Mark R. Conaway, Jaroslaw Dziegielewski, James M. Larner, Daniel Gioeli. Checkpoint kinase 2 is a novel regulator of prostate cancer cell growth. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 5049. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-5049

BACKGROUND Phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) is lost as a function of prostate tumor androgen dependence. While the transcriptional activity of the androgen receptor (AR) is inhibited by PTEN in androgen sensitive prostate cancer (CaP), the role of PTEN in androgen disease is unclear. METHODS We developed a system where PTEN can be conditionally re-expressed at physiologic levels into a PTEN null metastatic human CaP cell line, C4-2, and androgen responsiveness examined. RESULTS PTEN induction reduces cell growth and blocks the growth effect of synthetic androgen R1881. The anti-androgen Casodex enhances the growth-inhibitory action of PTEN and this effect is independent of Akt phosphorylation. Combined PTEN induction and Casodex, result in a further decrease in prostate specific antigen promoter activity compared to PTEN but not Casodex alone. CONCLUSIONS PTEN induction confers androgen independent CaP cells enhanced responsiveness to the anti-proliferative effects of anti-androgens and this action may involve non-AR mediated effects. Prostate 66: 1114-1123, 2006. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The tumor antigens simian virus 40 small t antigen (ST) and polyomavirus small and medium T antigens mediate cell transformation in part by binding to the structural A subunit of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A). The replacement of B subunits by tumor antigens inhibits PP2A activity and prolongs phosphorylation-dependent signaling. Here we show that ST mediates PP2A A/C heterodimer transfer onto the ligand-activated androgen receptor (AR). Transfer by ST is strictly dependent on the agonist-activated conformation of AR, occurs within minutes of the addition of androgen to cells, and can occur in either the cytoplasm or the nucleus. The binding of ST changes the conformation of the A subunit, and ST rapidly dissociates from the complex upon PP2A A/C heterodimer binding to AR. PP2A is transferred onto the carboxyl-terminal half of AR, and the phosphatase activity is directed to five phosphoserines in the amino-terminal activation function region 1, with a corresponding reduction in transactivation. Thus, ST functions as a transfer factor to specify PP2A targeting in the cell and modulates the transcriptional activity of AR.

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among men and the second leading cause of male cancer deaths in the United States. When prostate cancer initially presents in the clinic, the tumour is dependent on androgen for growth and, therefore, responsive to the surgical or pharmacological ablation of circulating androgens. However, there is a high rate of treatment failure because the disease often recurs as androgen-independent metastases. Surprisingly, this late-stage androgen-independent prostate cancer almost always retains expression of the AR (androgen receptor), despite the near absence of circulating androgens. Although late-stage prostate cancer is androgen-independent, the AR still seems to play a role in cancer cell growth at this stage of disease. Therefore a key to understanding hormone-independent prostate cancer is to determine the mechanism(s) by which the AR can function even in the absence of physiological levels of circulating androgen. This review will focus on the role of growth factor signalling in prostate cancer progression to androgen independence and thus outline potential molecular areas of intervention to treat prostate cancer progression.

Progression of prostate cancer ultimately results in a disease that is refractory to hormone ablation therapy but nevertheless continues to require the androgen receptor. Progression to hormone refractory disease is often correlated with overexpression of growth factors and receptors capable of establishing autocrine and/or paracrine growth-stimulatory loops. Many of these growth factor receptors engage the Ras/mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway as part of their signaling activities. This raises the possibility that chronic activation of Ras/MAP kinase signaling could cause or contribute to the progression of prostate cancer. We have demonstrated previously that MAP kinase activation correlates with the progression to advanced hormone refractory disease in patient samples. Here we demonstrate that stable expression of Ras effector-loop mutants that activate the Ras/MAP kinase pathway is sufficient to reduce the androgen requirement of LNCaP prostate cancer cells for growth, prostate-specific antigen expression, and tumorigenicity. We propose that chronic activation of endogenous c-Ras by autocrine and paracrine growth factor stimulation sensitizes the androgen receptor transcriptional complex to subphysiological levels of androgen. This provides a common mechanism for prostate cancer progression driven by diverse agonists.

Progression of prostate cancer to androgen-refractory disease is correlated with increased expression of growth factors and receptors capable of establishing autocrine and/or paracrine growth-stimulatory loops. Many of these growth factor receptors engage Ras as part of their normal signaling activities, raising the possibility that activation of endogenous c-Ras could be a common mechanism for prostate cancer progression. Here we demonstrate that inducible expression of a dominant negative form of Ras restores androgen sensitivity to a hormone-refractory prostate cancer cell line. We show that expression of RasN17 in the hormone-refractory C4-2 cell line enhances in vitro sensitivity to the growth-inhibitory action of the antiandrogen Casodex and inhibits anchorage-independent cell growth. Moreover, although induction of RasN17 by itself has no observable effect on the growth of C4-2 xenografts in intact male mice, it restores androgen dependence to the C4-2 xenografts so that they dramatically regress after surgical androgen ablation.

Activation of signal transduction kinase cascades has been shown to alter androgen receptor (AR) activity. Although it has been suggested that changes in AR phosphorylation might be directly responsible, the basal and regulated phosphorylations of the AR have not been fully determined. We have identified the major sites of AR phosphorylation on ARs expressed in COS-1 cells using a combination of peptide mapping, Edman degradation, and mass spectrometry. We describe the identification of seven AR phosphorylation sites, show that the phosphopeptides seen with exogenously expressed ARs are highly similar to those seen with endogenous ARs in LNCaP cells and show that specific agonists differentially regulate the phosphorylation state of endogenous ARs in LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Treatment of LNCaP cells with the synthetic androgen, R1881, elevates phosphorylation of serines 16, 81, 256, 308, 424, and 650. Ser-94 appears constitutively phosphorylated. Forskolin, epidermal growth factor, and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate increase the phosphorylation of Ser-650. The kinetics of phosphorylation of most sites in response to hormone or forskolin is temporally delayed, reaching a maximum at 2 h post-stimulation. The exception is Ser-81, which continues to display increasing phosphorylation at 6 h. These data provide a basis for analyzing mechanisms of cross-talk between growth factor signaling and androgen in prostate development, physiology, and cancer.