51. Biotechnology or organic? Extensive or intensive? Global or local? A critical review of potential pathways to resolve the global food crisis
- Author
-
Krishna Kc, Alexander Legwegoh, Rylea Johnson, Mike CoDyre, Rickey Y. Yada, Rene C. Van Acker, Evan D. G. Fraser, Hannah Wittman, Sri Sethuratnam, Lisa Ohberg, John Smithers, Goretty Dias, Ralph C. Martin, Shelley Hazen, Jennifer Vansteenkiste, and Lauren Q. Sneyd
- Subjects
education.field_of_study ,Food security ,Poverty ,business.industry ,Population ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,010501 environmental sciences ,01 natural sciences ,Food sovereignty ,Biotechnology ,Food distribution ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,Economics ,Food processing ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,Food systems ,Agricultural productivity ,education ,business ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Food Science - Abstract
While experts agree that poverty, population, energy prices, climate change, and socio-political dynamics undermine global food security, there is no agreement on effective strategies to meet this challenge. For example, some promote “high tech” solutions (e.g. biotechnology) designed to boost yield while others prefer local food systems. To better understand these debates, this article explores four perspectives from the literature: (1) technology to increase food production; (2) equitable food distribution; (3) policies to reduce pollution and waste; and (4) community action to promote sovereign food systems. The paper concludes with recommendations on how food scientists can navigate these controversies to help research and policy making.
- Published
- 2016