Search

Introduction: It is important for robotic surgery to be cost-effective, especially by reducing the length of stay (LOS). Therefore, we developed a protocol for day-case robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). This study aimed to validate this as a safe practice of care and to assess the potential benefits to the hospital and patient., Methods: In this single-centre study, all patients booked for RARP between April 2022 and October 2022 were screened for suitability for day case. All tumour types were included. Exclusion criteria were a history of complex abdominal surgeries, salvage prostatectomy, body mass index (BMI) > 35 and patient living alone or > 150 km away from the hospital. All day-case RARPs were performed as a morning case with a protocol for review throughout the day with evening discharge if mobilising independently and eating/drinking well. The primary outcome of the study was success rate of discharge home on day of surgery (DOS) with secondary outcomes of readmissions and complications. A patient questionnaire was completed at home including both visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction rating., Results: Forty-five patients underwent day-case RARP over a 6-month period with minimum of 30 days of follow-up. 41/45 (91%) had successful DOS discharge home. The four admissions overnight were due to dizziness, low oxygen saturation, intraoperative complications and a diagnosis of COVID-19. There were no readmissions and no 30-day complications. The most common issues at home were catheter discomfort and constipation with low mean VAS pain score and low nausea reported. The overall patient satisfaction rating was very high at 4.8/5, and 97% said they would recommend to a family member. The cost saving for the hospital was 400 pounds per patient., Conclusion: Day-case procedure is a viable, safe and efficient pathway for appropriately selected and counselled patients undergoing RARP., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction Urinary bladder diverticulum (UBD) is commonly seen in urological practice and, in most cases, does not need treatment specifically directed towards it. However, it can give rise to symptoms that are not distinct from this finding. This makes the evaluation and management of this complex patient group challenging. We present our experience with robotic bladder diverticulectomy (RBD) for acquired bladder diverticulum to assess the outcomes and safety of this procedure when patient symptoms have failed to respond to either medical or surgical treatment directed at other associated contributing factors. Methods We retrospectively collected data on all patients who underwent RBD for persistent lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) at Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, between 2016 and 2021, including baseline characteristics, urodynamic findings, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and a six-month follow-up. Patients who were diagnosed with cancer in the diverticulum, associated pathology that may contribute to their symptoms, or who had concomitant procedures at the time of RBD were excluded from this study. Results We had six patients who underwent RBD; the median age and body mass index (BMI) were 63.8 years (range 48-73) and 27.1 kg/m 2  (range 24-32), respectively. The most common presenting symptoms were refractory LUTS and recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs). The urodynamic evaluation revealed varying findings like bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), poor compliance, and equivocal readings in these patients. All patients reported incomplete bladder emptying and double voiding, with half practicing clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC). Diverticulum size averaged 9.4 cm (range 8.5-12). The median operative time and blood loss were 166 mins (range 150-180) and 75 mls (range 50-100), respectively. The average length of stay was 1.6 days (range 1-3). Three patients developed UTIs within a month after surgery, requiring a course of oral antibiotics. Post-void residual (PVR) measured an average of 32.6 mls (range 0-161) postoperatively compared to a preoperative average of 249 mls (range 125-400), showing a two-tailed p-value of 0.016. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score for these patients showed an average of 27.83 (range 24-31) preoperatively compared to the postoperative average of eight (range 7-12), showing a two-tailed p-value of 0.0001. Final histology showed no malignancy, and all patients reported symptom improvement, with none requiring CISC after surgery. Conclusion RBD is a safe and effective procedure in carefully selected patients with refractory LUTS and UTIs showing good postoperative and functional outcomes. The presence of a large diverticulum can have a complex effect on bladder dynamics. In the era of robotic surgery and enhanced recovery, discussion about diverticulectomy should be encouraged after proper evaluation and counseling for patients who have failed to improve with other measures of treatment for their symptoms., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Janardanan et al.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Introduction: The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has overwhelmed most health services. As a result, many surgeries have been deferred and diagnoses delayed. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic at a high-volume pelvic oncology centre., Methods: A retrospective review was performed of clinical activity from 2017 to 2020. We compared caseload for index procedures 2017-2019 (period 1) versus 2020 (period 2) to see the effect of the COVID pandemic. We then compared the activity during the first lockdown (March 23rd) to the rest of the year when we increased our theatre access by utilising a 'clean' site., Results: The average annual number of robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed during period 1 was 82 and 352 respectively. This reduced to 68 (17.1% reduction) and 262 (25.6% reduction) during period 2. The number of patients who underwent prostate brachytherapy decreased from 308 to 243 (21% reduction). The number of prostate biopsies decreased from 420 to 234 (44.3% reduction). The number of radical orchidectomies decreased from 18 to 11 (39% reduction). The mean number of RARC and RARP per month during period 2 was 5.5 and 22. This decreased to 4 and 9 per month during the first national lockdown but was maintained thereafter despite two further lockdowns., Conclusion: There has been a substantial decrease in urological oncology caseload during the COVID pandemic. The use of alternate pathways such as 'clean' sites can ensure continuity of care for cancer surgery and training needs.

Androgen therapy is the mainstay of treatment in female to male (FtM) transgender persons to increase testosterone levels, suppress oestrogens and treat gender dysphoria. Testosterone is widely used for male hypogonadism, but is comparatively under-investigated in FtM transgender persons. The aim of our study was to identify treatment and safety outcomes associated with testosterone use in transgender medicine. Androgens in FtM transgender persons are effective to lower voice frequency, increase facial hair-growth, and increase hematocrit and hemoglobin levels to adult male reference ranges. A 1.2-fold-3.7-fold higher rate of myocardial infarction has been reported retrospectively, compared to cisgender women. Blood pressure, glycaemic control and body mass index remained unchanged in FtM transgender persons. Androgens in FtM transgender persons have important cardio-metabolic implications. Randomised control trials, longer follow-up periods and studies involving older persons may further improve the management of FtM transgender persons., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To report clinical and functional outcomes for patients who have undergone salvage robot-assisted seminal vesicle excision (RA-SVE) for the focal treatment of isolated seminal vesical (SV) recurrence after treatment for prostate cancer by low-dose-rate brachytherapy., Patients and Methods: Patients with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB) underwent multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) of the prostate and 11 C-Choline or 68 Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen ( 68 Ga-PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan, followed by targeted transperineal biopsy of the prostate and SVs. Isolated SV recurrence were identified in 17 (0.38%) LDR-PB patients. These 17 patients were offered RA-SVE., Results: The median total operative time was 90 min and blood loss 50 mL with no postoperative transfusions required. The median hospital stay was 1 day. No intra- or postoperative complications were documented. Continence status was unaffected, no patient required urinary pads. Postoperative pathology confirmed SV invasion in all specimens. Surgical margins were positive in seven (41%) patients. All patients had at least one positive imaging study, although three (18%) mp-MRI and five (29%) PET/CT assessments were negative. One (6%) pre-SVE biopsy was also negative but with positive imaging. Salvage SVE failure, defined as three consecutive PSA rises or the need for further treatment, occurred in six patients of whom three had a positive margin. Overall failure-free survival rates were 86%, 67%, and 53% at 1, 2, and 3 years after SVE, respectively., Conclusions: Salvage RA-SVE appears to be a safe focal treatment, with very low morbidity, for patients with localised SV recurrence after LDR-PB. It permits deferral of androgen deprivation therapy in selected patients. Bilateral SVE is mandatory. This surgical option should be considered in patients with isolated prostate cancer recurrence to the SV., (© 2021 The Authors BJU International © 2021 BJU International.)

Objective: To assess treatment satisfaction and decision regret post robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and correlate these with clinical, demographic and quality of life indicators. Our study took place at a high-volume United Kingdom center and patients were assessed at a minimum of 18 months postsurgery., Methods: Patients who underwent RARP between June 2011 and May 2016 were invited to participate through mailed questionnaires. A total of 207 patients formed our cohort. The questionnaires included European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life of Cancer patients 30 and PR25 modules, sexual health inventory in men and Likert decisional regret scale. A Decisional Regret Scale score of >15 was used to define an outcome of high decision regret., Results: The mean patient age was 63 years and the mean duration of follow up was 36 months. Of the 106 responders, 51 (48%) were fully satisfied with the decision to undergo RARP and 32 (30%) recorded high regret. The mean Decisional Regret Scale score was 11.3. High decision regret associated with the length of time from RARP to questionnaire administration, higher prostate specific quality of life symptom scores and lower sexual and erectile function scores., Conclusion: Our study represents the first contemporary United Kingdom series assessing decision regret following the management of localised prostate cancer with RARP. Higher regret was seen in one third of patients and was associated with worse disease-specific quality of life, sexual and erectile function measures. To minimize regret, collaborative and detailed discussion should take place pre-operatively when counselling patients about RARP. The potential longevity and impact on quality of life of these side effects should be made clear., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None declared for any of the authors, (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We aim to outline our technique of performing a robotic-assisted bladder diverticulectomy at our institution and report our surgical outcomes. We report the cases of three robotic-assisted bladder diverticulectomies, performed at the Royal Surrey County Hospital during the period of January 2014 to December 2015. Patient was positioned in low dorsal lithotomy position. A 6Fr double-J stent was prophylactically inserted at the start of the procedure. Foley catheter was placed over guide wire into the diverticulum and balloon inflated on the diverticulum neck. We used a transperitoneal extravesical approach to mobilise the distended bladder diverticulum, dissected en bloc and transected at the diverticulum neck in all cases. The bladder was closed in two layers with absorbable sutures. The procedures were uneventful, without post-operative complications and minimal blood loss. The median length of stay was 3 days and all three patients reported a significant improvement in all symptoms with non-significant post-void residuals. Robotic-assisted bladder diverticulectomy is a safe and effective procedure that results in both symptom relief and minimal post-void residuals.

Unlabelled: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: Erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy constitutes a challenge to the urologist. The mainstay of medical treatment after radical prostatectomy to restore spontaneous erectile function remains phosphodiesterase (PDE5) inhibitors, despite the fact that data from animal studies suggesting that PDE5 inhibitors can prevent smooth muscle apoptosis and fibrosis have not yet been extrapolated to humans because of a lack of standardized protocols. If the above treatment fails, second-line therapies such as intraurethral prostaglandins, penile injection therapy and vacuum devices are offered. When less invasive therapies are ineffective, interventions that preserve sexual function such as penile prosthesis implantation become the treatment of choice. Our study reveals the alternative of penile prosthesis implantation as first-line treatment in erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. It also highlights its superiority to the oral PDE5 inhibitor treatment, regarding the erection, frequency, firmness, maintenance and penetration ability. This suggests that a concept of an early penile intervention in the future would be promising for those patients who wish to remain sexually active without depending on oral formulations with doubtful and delayed results., Objective: To evaluate the outcome of penile prosthesis surgery in comparison to oral phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor administration, in men with erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, as early penile intervention therapy., Patients and Methods: A total of 174 patients treated by nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) for clinically localized prostate cancer, between January 2006 and September 2009 enrolled in the study, 153 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and 69 (45%) patients presented with post-RRP erectile dysfunction 6 months after primary surgery. Fifty-four patients were disease-free and subdivided into two arms according to treatment modality, either tadalafil three times/week or penile prosthesis implantation. All patients were evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire preoperatively and at 6, 12 and 24 month postoperatively. Repeated measurements analysis of variance was conducted to evaluate the effect of time and group on IIEF total score., Results: There was a significant reduction in IIEF score from preoperative values to the first measurement after surgery in both treatment groups. The overall degree of change from the first time point immediately after surgery to 2 years was greater in the penile prosthesis group than the tadalafil group (20.4 ± 1.3 vs 8.1 ± 2.4, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: The efficacy and satisfaction results of both treatment types are considered acceptable. However, regarding the erection frequency, firmness, penetration ability, maintenance and erection confidence it seems that penile prosthesis implantation is superior to oral treatment. The concept of early penile intervention should be considered and is promising for all patients with post-RRP erectile dysfunction., (© 2012 BJU International.)