Search

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a renal complication occurring after the administration of iodinated contrast agents routinely used in medical imaging. CIN causes acute renal failure of varying severity. The pathophysiology of CIN is probably multifactorial: it involves (i) renal vasoconstriction inducing tissue hypoxia, and (ii) a possible direct toxicity of iodine derivatives leading to tubular inflammation and necrosis. Several risk factors are associated with CIN, some related to the procedure itself, others to the patient's co-morbid profile. In particular, the pre-existence of chronic renal failure, dehydration, congestive heart failure, diabetes or hypotension has been associated with an increased risk of CIN, as summarized in the Mehran score. Prevention of CIN relies essentially on adequate i.v. hydration before and after the procedure, and on the administration of the lowest possible volumes of contrast. In patients at high risk of CIN, the use of metformin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is contraindicated at the time of contrast medium i.v. injection. In these patients, renal function assessment after 3-7 days post imaging is required.

For patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), no reliable biomarkers for predicting therapeutic response or assisting in treatment selection and sequencing are currently available. Using the recent European Association of Urology and European Association of Nuclear Medicine recommendations, we aimed to compare response assessment between prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT and conventional imaging in mCRPC patients starting first-line treatment with a novel hormonal agent (NHA) and to perform a sequential comparative analysis of PSMA PET/CT-derived parameters after 4 and 12 wk of therapy. Methods: Data from 18 mCRPC patients who started NHA treatment and underwent 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT before therapy initiation (baseline), at week 4 (W4), and at week 12 (W12) in addition to conventional imaging (bone scintigraphy, CT) at baseline and W12 were retrospectively included. PET/CT images were quantitatively analyzed for maximum and mean SUV and total PSMA ligand-positive lesions. Comparative analysis of PET/CT-derived parameters was performed, and patients were classified as having nonprogressive disease or progressive disease (PD) according to 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, prostate-specific antigen, and conventional imaging criteria. Results: Treatment response was evaluable by 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in 16 of 18 patients (89%) and by conventional imaging in 11 of 18 patients (61%). Five of 16 patients classified as having PD by 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT at W12 had already met progression criteria at W4, and substantial agreement was observed between W4 and W12 (κ, 0.74) 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT results. Nonetheless, 2 of 16 patients (13%) were incorrectly classified as having PD because of a flare phenomenon on PSMA PET/CT that disappeared at W12. Conclusion: Volumetric assessments of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging can improve response evaluation in NHA-treated patients with mCRPC. Although early response assessments at W4 need to be approached with caution because of flare, 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging at W4 and W12 revealed substantial agreement in therapy response assessments; these findings warrant further investigation to distinguish PD from flare at W4 and help improve the understanding of resistance to therapy., (© 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

The detection rates of whole-body combined [ 18 F]NaF/[ 18 F]FDG positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT), CT alone, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI), and X-ray were prospectively studied in patients with treatment-requiring plasma cell disorders The detection rates of imaging techniques were compared, and focal lesions were classified according to their anatomic location. Twenty-six out of 30 initially included patients were assessable. The number of focal lesions detected in newly diagnosed patients (n = 13) and in relapsed patients (n = 13) were 296 and 234, respectively. The detection rate of PET/CT was significantly higher than those of WB-MRI (P < 0.05) and CT (P < 0.0001) both in patients with newly diagnosed and in those with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). The X-ray detection rate was significantly lower than those of all other techniques, while CT detected more lesions compared with WB-MRI at diagnosis (P = 0.025). With regard to the infiltration patters, relapsed patients presented more diffuse patterns, and more focal lesions located in the limbs compared with newly diagnosed patients. In conclusion, the detection rate of [ 18 F]NaF/[ 18 F]FDG PET/CT was significantly higher than those of CT, MRI, and X-ray, while the detection rate of X-rays was significantly lower than those of all other imaging techniques except for focal lesions located in the skull., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

An observational study was set up to assess the feasibility of [ 18 F]FPRGD 2 PET/CT for imaging patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and to compare its detection rate with low dose CT alone and combined [ 18 F]NaF/[ 18 F]FDG PET/CT images. Four patients (2 newly diagnosed patients and 2 with relapsed MM) were included and underwent whole-body PET/CT after injection of [ 18 F]FPRGD 2 . The obtained images were compared with results of low dose CT and already available results of a combined [ 18 F]NaF/[ 18 F]FDG PET/CT. In total, 81 focal lesions (FLs) were detected with PET/CT and an underlying bone destruction or fracture was seen in 72 (89%) or 8 (10%) FLs, respectively. Fewer FLs (54%) were detected by [ 18 F]FPRGD 2 PET/CT compared to low dose CT (98%) or [ 18 F]NaF/[ 18 F]FDG PET/CT (70%) and all FLs detected with [ 18 F]FPRGD 2 PET were associated with an underlying bone lesion. In one newly diagnosed patient, more [ 18 F]FPRGD 2 positive lesions were seen than [ 18 F]NaF/[ 18 F]FDG positive lesions. This study suggests that [ 18 F]FPRGD 2 PET/CT might be less useful for the detection of myeloma lesions in patients with advanced disease as all FLs with [ 18 F]FPRGD 2 uptake were already detected with CT alone.