Search

SIGNIFICANCE A multipurpose disinfecting solution (MPDS), which contains povidone-iodine (PI) as a disinfectant, has high disinfecting efficacy not only on planktonic bacterium but also on the case biofilms. The addition of case hygiene practice removed more bacteria from cases than MPDS alone. PURPOSE This study compared the ability of two MPDSs, one containing PI and another containing polyaminopropyl biguanide and polyquaternium, to reduce bacterial numbers in solution or adhered to the cases following case hygiene procedures. METHODS Bacterial strains (Delftia acidovorans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis) were exposed to the MPDSs for the recommended disinfection times, and the viable number evaluated according to ISO 14729. Cases were inoculated with bacterial strains and incubated for 24 hours to allow for biofilm formation. Cases were disinfected with both disinfecting solutions for 4 hours and rinsed, followed by recapping or air-drying, or tissue-wiping and air-drying for 18 hours. The number of survivors was counted using standard culture techniques. RESULTS Both products exceeded the recommended 3-log reduction against planktonic bacteria. Regarding biofilm, after rinsing and recapping wet, the numbers of D. acidovorans (mean difference [95% confidence interval] log10 colony-forming units per case, -2.9 [0.8 to -4.6], P < .01), P. aeruginosa (-2.0 [0.5 to -3.1], P < .01), S. marcescens (-1.7 [0.8 to -3.5], P < .05), and S. epidermidis (-2.1 [0.6 to -3.5], P < .05) in PI cases were significantly lower than in the dual-disinfectant MPDS storage cases. After air-drying, the PI storage cases had significantly lower numbers of S. maltophilia (-2.6 [0.6 to -4.0], P < .01), D. acidovorans (-1.6 [0.7 to -3.3], P < .05), and S. aureus (-1.6 [0.7 to -3.1], P < .05). The addition of tissue-wiping reduced the bacterial numbers in the MPDS storage cases to levels in the PI storage cases. CONCLUSIONS Contact lens users should be recommended to tissue-wipe and air-dry their lens storage cases after disinfection with regular MPDS.

Acanthamoeba keratitis is a sight-endangering eye infection, and causative organism Acanthamoeba presents a significant concern to public health, given escalation of contact lens wearers. Contemporary therapy is burdensome, necessitating prompt diagnosis and aggressive treatment. None of the contact lens disinfectants (local and international) can eradicate Acanthamoeba effectively. Using a range of compounds targeting cellulose, ion channels, and biochemical pathways, we employed bioassay-guided testing to determine their anti-amoebic effects. The results indicated that acarbose, indaziflam, terbuthylazine, glimepiride, inositol, vildagliptin and repaglinide showed anti-amoebic effects. Compounds showed minimal toxicity on human cells. Therefore, effects of the evaluated compounds after conjugation with nanoparticles should certainly be the subject of future studies and will likely lead to promising leads for potential applications.

To determine the antimicrobial efficacy of a povidone-iodine system (PVP-I; cleadew, OPHTECS Corporation, Kobe, Japan), a peroxide system (AOSEPT Plus with HydraGlyde, Alcon, Fort Worth, TX), and a chemical multipurpose system (renu fresh, BauschLomb, Rochester, NY) on contact lens case surfaces that are both in contact and not in contact with the solutions during lens disinfection.The surfaces of the inner walls, underside of the lid, and lens holder (if applicable) of the cases were inoculated with P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853. The cases were disinfected with the solutions as per their manufacturer instructions. After disinfection, the inoculated surfaces were swabbed and the amount of surviving P. aeruginosa was determined. Following this experiment, separate cases were inoculated and disinfected as before. This time the cases were agitated after recommended disinfection time and the amount of P. aeruginosa in the disinfecting solution was quantified immediately, and again after resting for 7 days. Experiments were conducted in triplicate (n = 3).Units are expressed in log CFU. All three solutions significantly reduced P. aeruginosa on direct-contact surfaces (all p0.039). On non-contact surfaces, the reduction of P. aeruginosa in the PVP-I system (pre-disinfection: 6.8 ± 0.5, post-disinfection: 1.0 ± 0.0; p0.001) was significant, but not for the hydrogen peroxide system (pre-disinfection: 6.3 ± 0.6, post: 5.5 ± 0.5; p = 0.194) and the chemical multipurpose system (pre-disinfection: 6.6 ± 0.1, post-disinfection: 5.6 ± 0.8; p = 0.336). After 7 days post-disinfection, no P. aeruginosa regrowth was observed in the PVP-I system (Day 1: 1.0 ± 0.0, Day 7: 1.0 ± 0.0; p = 1) and the chemical multipurpose system (Day 1: 4.2 ± 0.2, Day 7: 1.8 ± 0.9; p = 0.012), however regrowth was observed in the hydrogen peroxide system (Day 1: 3.4 ± 0.6, Day 7: 6.1 ± 0.4; p = 0.003).The PVP-I system was more effective against P. aeruginosa on non-contact surfaces than the hydrogen peroxide system or the chemical multipurpose system and is capable of inhibiting regrowth of P. aeruginosa for at least 7 days post-disinfection.

To provide a relationship between materials developed for silicone hydrogel contact lenses and multipurpose care solutions to identify improvements in wettability, for prelens noninvasive break-up time and subjective score.This systematic review was completed according to the updated PRISMA 2020 statement recommendations and followed the explanation and elaboration guidelines. The PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus scientific literature databases were searched from January 2000 to November 2021.A total of four clinical trials published between 2011 and 2017 were included in this investigation. All included studies were randomized clinical trials. The success of contact lenses is related to the comfort of their use and therefore to the stability of the tear film and the wettability of its surface. The relationship between these parameters and changes in the ocular surface and inflammatory and infectious processes has been demonstrated.Hyaluronan and propylene glycol multipurpose solution (MPS) wetting agents achieved slightly higher prelens noninvasive break-up times than poloxamine. Polyquaternium-1 achieved better wettability and patient comfort than polyhexamethylene biguanide in medium-term studies. Short-term studies did not demonstrate differences between MPSs in their effect on contact lens wettability.

Acanthamoeba castellanii is a protist pathogen that can cause sight-threatening keratitis and a fatal infection of the central nervous system, known as granulomatous amoebic encephalitis. In this study, effects of five malonic acid and salicylic acid-based deep eutectic solvents (DES) on A. castellanii were investigated. These are salicylic acid-trioctylphosphine (DES 1), salicylic acid- trihexylamine (DES 2), salicylic acid-trioctylamine (DES 3), malonic acid-trioctylphosphine (DES 4) and malonic acid-trihexylamine (DES 5). The experiments were done by performing amoebicidal, encystment, excystment, cytopathogenicity, and cytotoxicity assays. At micromolar dosage, the solvents DES 2 and DES 3 displayed significant amoebicidal effects (P 0.05), inhibited encystment and excystment, undermined the cell-mediated cytopathogenicity of A. castellanii, and also displayed minimal cytotoxicity to human cells. Conversely, the chemical components of these solvents: salicylic acid, trihexylamine, and trioctylamine showed minimal effects when tested individually. These results are very promising and to the best of our knowledge, are reported for the first time on the effects of deep eutectic solvents on amoebae. These results can be applied in the development of new formulations of novel contact lens disinfectants against Acanthamoeba castellanii.

Significance Midday fogging of scleral contact lenses requires frequent lens removal and reapplication for a large portion of lens wearers. Using a lens filling solution that mimics the composition of tears is hypothesized to have an impact on the production of material trapped under a scleral lens. Purpose The purposes of this open-label study were to assess the safety of a scleral lens filling solution, which closely approximates the ionic concentration and pH of human tears, and to assess signs and symptoms of midday fogging with this formulation and with subjects' habitual sodium chloride solutions. Methods Existing scleral lens wearers with midday fogging (N = 22) were examined and completed surveys of symptoms. Subjects filled the concavity of their current lenses with test solution and were assessed immediately and approximately 4 hours later for safety monitoring. Test solution was dispensed and used for 5 to 9 days when subjects were reexamined and repeated the surveys. Biomicroscopy and anterior optical coherence tomography images were used to assess midday fogging objectively. Results The median (interquartile range) Ocular Surface Disease Index score decreased from 27.1 (21.7) U when using habitual filling solution to 9.1 (20.1) U when using the test solution (P = .006). Current Symptoms Survey findings with the test solution compared with habitual solution resulted in statistically significant decreases in burning/stinging (P = .04), grittiness/foreign body sensation (P = .01), dryness (P = .002), blurry/fluctuating vision (P = .002), and overall pain/discomfort (P = .006). Objective assessment of corneal staining and fogging revealed decreases that were not statistically significant in this small sample size. Conclusions This study establishes the safety and subject tolerance of a scleral lens filling solution that mimics the ionic composition of human tears. Significant improvements in subjective ratings, although likely biased in this unmasked trial, suggest that further studies of the effectiveness of this solution in reducing midday fogging are warranted.

Purpose this survey aimed to assess levels of compliance with contact lens wear and care among university student’s population in Jordan. Methods An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to assess the extent of compliance among contact lens wearers toward contact lens care in a university population. The questionnaire included 12 questions regarding compliance with contact lens care, lens case/solution replacement, general hygiene procedures related to contact lens and adherence to aftercare visits. Results 210 contact lens wearers were interviewed. Of the study population 187 (89 %) were females and 23 (11 %) were males. The average age of the study group was 22.35 (± 3.77) years and all the study population were students (undergraduate or postgraduate).The average compliance rate of the study population was 75 %. High level of compliance was noticeable in the following aspects; not sharing lenses with others, not sleeping while wearing lenses, hand washing before lens use and not using water to clean lenses. Moderate level of compliance was reported in the following aspects; showering/swimming with lenses, using lenses longer than recommended replacement schedule and all behaviours related to contact lens care solution. However, low levels of compliance were reported in relation to cleaning and rinsing lens case and adherence to aftercare visits. Conclusion High to moderate levels of compliance were reported generally by participants. However, better strategies are recommended to further increase levels of compliance among contact lens wearers in Jordan related to adherence to aftercare visits. While this study is targeted contact lens wearers from a university student’s population, a future study is recommended to include larger sample of contact lens wearers from the general lay population.

When a contact lens is in contact with the eyelid and the cornea, tear proteins start to be accumulated on the lens and may subsequently undergo conformational changes. Protein adsorption or conformational changes on the lens may lead to discomfort, red eye, or even inflammatory reactions. Although measuring the friction coefficient of contact lens has been linked to comfort degree in vivo, there is not much research about the effects of tear protein deposition on the friction coefficient of the contact lens. Therefore, we investigated the friction coefficient of three distinct materials of contact lenses in two different lysosomal concentrations. We also studied lysozyme deposition on the lens without the influence of friction. The results demonstrated that although the amount of lysozyme deposition was high on all the materials we tested, it was not corresponded to higher friction coefficient. In addition, we investigated the effect of the contact lens care solution we developed on friction coefficient and lysozyme deposition of three different materials of contact lenses. The results showed that the care solution could reduce the increased friction coefficient caused by high lysosomal concentration. Therefore, we proposed a potential mechanism of why lysosomal deposition may result in high friction coefficient for certain types of hydrogel contact lenses.

Significance Scleral lenses have become an increasingly common treatment for ocular surface disease and irregular corneas. Multidose, preservative-free saline solutions are frequently used off-label to fill scleral lenses. Because the fluid resides over the ocular surface during lens wear, contaminated solutions may increase the risk of infectious complications. Purpose We sought to assess the viability of skin microorganisms and pathogens associated with keratitis once introduced into a multidose preservative-free saline (MDPFS) solution containing the bacteriostatic agent boric acid (PuriLens Plus; The Lifestyle Co., Inc., Freehold, NJ). Methods Eleven bacterial and one yeast isolate were each inoculated to three lots of MDPFS as well as to sterile normal saline for comparison. Microorganism concentrations were enumerated at baseline and days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28. Persistence of microorganism viability was compared between MDPFS lots and between MDPFS and normal saline for each organism. Results Duration of microorganism viability was ≥24 hours in MDPFS with no significant difference in the distribution of survival duration of microorganisms in MDPFS versus normal saline (P = .15). Candida albicans concentrations declined 14 days earlier in MDPFS, whereas concentrations of viable organisms in MDPFS remained within 1 log of baseline for the longest durations for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7 days), Escherichia coli (14 days), and Achromobacter xylosoxidans (≥28 days). Gram-positive organism concentrations remained within 1 log of baseline for no more than 3 days. Mild lot-to-lot variation in organism concentrations was noted near the end points of viability. Bacteriostasis was demonstrated in that concentrations of all organisms remained at or below baseline levels throughout the 28-day period. Conclusions After microbial contamination, persistence of organism viability was similar in PuriLens and normal saline. Environmental gram-negative organisms, many of which can contribute to infectious keratitis, can persist for weeks once introduced into saline solutions.

Objective During use, contact lens disinfecting solutions are exposed to tears and clinical microbial isolates. The current study was designed to test the performance of several disinfecting solution in the presence of organic soils or clinical isolates. Methods Standard and clinical isolates were exposed to the disinfecting solutions in the presence or absence of different organic soils. The number of microbial cells killed during disinfection was established by growing cells after disinfection on agar plates. Results The disinfecting activity of the povidone-iodine or hydrogen peroxide solutions was not affected by the organic soils or clinical isolates. The presence of yeast organic soil did not affect the performance of the disinfecting solutions when tested with standard microbial strains, but the addition of a model tear organic soil significantly reduced the disinfecting activity of the solutions containing various combinations of polyhexamethylene biguanide, polyquaternium-1, alexidine, and myristamindopropyl dimethylamine especially when tested against the standard fungal strains (reducing the effectiveness by between 0.5-4 log10) or the clinical bacterial isolates (reducing the effectiveness by between 0.5-3.5 log10). One disinfecting solution that contained polyquaternium-1 and myristamindopropyl dimethylamine had very poor activity against the clinical bacterial isolates in the absence or presence of either organic soil. Conclusions Povidone-iodine or hydrogen peroxide disinfecting solutions are not affected by organic soils and are very active against clinical bacterial isolates. Disinfecting solutions containing combinations of polyhexamethylene biguanide, polyquaternium-1, alexidine, and myristamindopropyl dimethylamine are affected by model tear organic soil and may have poor activity against clinical isolates.

Infection and inflammation during wearing contact lenses are the problems for the users of daily soft contact lenses. All Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and fungi play a role in this problem. In past decades, nanoparticles have largely been studied and shown good antimicrobial activity against various microorganisms. The present study aimed to prepare, characterize, and evaluate zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZNPs) as antimicrobial agents against different microorganisms.The ZNPs were synthesized in a special structure using the sol-gel process and characterized by XRD, TEM, and EDX. Antimicrobial properties of ZNPs suspension were investigated against different microorganisms (i.e.,The XRD, TEM, and EDX spectrum showed hexagonal structure and no impurity in the nanoparticles with a size of about 20 to 40 nanometers. Sterilized suspension of ZNPs was applied against bacterial species, and the results indicated 4 logarithms (CFU/mL) microbial growth reduction for most Gram-positive and Gram-negative species, except for Pseudomonas aeruginosa that showed 3.5 logarithms (CFU/mL) growth reduction. Furthermore, 1 and 1.7 logarithms (CFU/mL) growth reduction were observed for Candida albicans, applying 250 and 500 ppm ZNPs suspension, respectively, which is an acceptable result for fungal growth inhibition. Findings of this study indicated that the suspensions of ZNPs with 250 and 500 ppm showed acceptable bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects.ZNPs: Zinc oxide nanoparticles; XRD: X-ray diffraction; FWHM: Full width at half maximum; TEM: Transmission electron microscope; SEM: Scanning electron microscope; EDX: Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

Background: Contact lens usage is becoming increasingly popular amongst young people. Assessing their knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to contact lens wear is therefore important, so that gaps in understanding or incorrect practices can be rectified to promote continued safety and success of contact lens wear. Objectives: This study aimed to assess and describe the knowledge, attitudes and practices of contact lens wearers aged 18 to 30 years, in the greater Durban area of South Africa. Methods: A semi-structured questionnaire was used to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practice of the participants. Results: Two hundred and forty six participants completed the survey. Young contact lens wearers in this sample generally had poor knowledge with regards to appropriate hygiene and contact lens wear complications. Despite wearers exhibiting a positive attitude with satisfactory hand hygiene and lens cleaning practices, important aspects such as lens case hygiene, storage and lens removal practices were found to be unsatisfactory. Compliance with after-care visits was also unsatisfactory. Conclusion: There is a need for contact lens practitioners to educate young contact lens wearers regarding appropriate contact lens-related care, to promote long term ocular health and contact lens-related safety. Keywords: Contact lens use; adolescent population; South Africa.

Understanding the most efficacious products will allow clinicians to best communicate to patients and consumers the safest products on the market to reduce adverse events, including microbial keratitis, during contact lens use.

Significance: Compliance with hygiene and replacement of contact lens storage cases is key to avoid contact lens contamination and anterior ocular surface complications. However, compliance levels with these accessories remain low, even in patients with awareness of the risk associated with non-compliance. Purpose: To determine level of compliance with common practices regarding contact lens (CL) storage case hygiene and replacement, type of information provided by practitioners and risk perception. Methods: An ad hoc self-reported survey was used to collect demographic and CL wear details, compliance with storage case care, type of received information and risk perception (in a 1-to-5 scale). Inferential statistics explored the relationship of demographic details and type of received information with compliance and risk perception. Results: Non-daily disposable wearing participants returned 299 completed surveys, with a median age of 24 years (76.9% females). Monthly replacement silicone hydrogel CLs and multipurpose solutions were predominant. Self-reported compliance with storage case care was poor, with 19.1% of respondents never cleaning their cases, 68.6% exposing them to tap water, and 26.4% failing to replace them within 6 months of acquisition. Two-thirds of respondents received specific information on case maintenance, mainly in oral form. Perceived risk associated with poor-compliance practices was high (median values of 4 and 5), and increased with educational level (P= .02, regarding hand-washing; P= .03, regarding case hygiene), years of CL wear experience (P< .001, regarding hand-washing) and in those patients provided with specific information on CL case care (P= .01, regarding case replacement). Conclusions: Compliance with CL storage case hygiene and replacement was generally poor, although awareness of risk associated with non-compliance was high and influenced by factors related to demographic details, contact lens experience and patient-practitioner communication. Strategies must be explored to increase risk awareness through education as this may lead to better compliance practices.

Purpose To determine the amoebicidal activity of functionalized poly-epsilon-lysine hydrogels (pɛK+) against Acanthamoeba castellanii. Methods A. castellanii trophozoites and cysts were grown in the presence of pɛK solution (0–2.17 mM), pɛK or pɛK+ hydrogels, or commercial hydrogel contact lens (CL) for 24 hours or 7 days in PBS or Peptone-Yeast-Glucose (PYG) media (nutrient-deplete or nutrient-replete cultures, respectively). Toxicity was determined using propidium iodide and imaged using fluorescence microscopy. Ex vivo porcine corneas were inoculated with A. castellanii trophozoites ± pɛK, pɛK+ hydrogels or commercial hydrogel CL for 7 days. Corneal infection was assessed by periodic acid–Schiff staining and histologic analysis. Regrowth of A. castellanii from hydrogel lenses and corneal discs at 7 days was assessed using microscopy and enumeration. Results The toxicity of pɛK+ hydrogels resulted in the death of 98.52% or 83.31% of the trophozoites at 24 hours or 7 days, respectively. The toxicity of pɛK+ hydrogels resulted in the death of 70.59% or 82.32% of the cysts in PBS at 24 hours or 7 days, respectively. Cysts exposed to pɛK+ hydrogels in PYG medium resulted in 75.37% and 87.14% death at 24 hours and 7 days. Ex vivo corneas infected with trophozoites and incubated with pɛK+ hydrogels showed the absence of A. castellanii in the stroma, with no regrowth from corneas or pɛK+ hydrogel, compared with infected-only corneas and those incubated in presence of commercial hydrogel CL. Conclusions pɛK+ hydrogels demonstrated pronounced amoebicidal and cysticidal activity against A. castellanii. pɛK+ hydrogels have the potential for use as CLs that could minimize the risk of CL-associated Acanthamoeba keratitis.

ObjectiveSight-threatening infections can be caused by pathogenic micro-organisms colonising the cornea, leading to microbial keratitis (MK). These micro-organisms can be introduced to the eye via improper contact lens use and care. MK can also result from ineffective contact lens care solutions (CLCs), even if the patient is following best practice guidelines. Therefore, it is critical to understand the differences between the effectiveness of popular CLCs on the global market.Methods and analysisFollowing the International Standards Organisation standards 14 729 and 18259, bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus), fungi (Candida albicans, Fusarium strains) and Acanthamoeba strains were inoculated into each CLC with and without contact lenses, and held for the manufacturer’s stated disinfection time. Plate counts were conducted to determine the number of surviving micro-organisms.ResultsAll CLCs examined met the primary log reduction criteria during stand-alone testing for Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Candida and Fusarium. renu Multiplus, All Clean Soft, and Kombilösung Super did not meet the primary criteria when challenged with Serratia. Only OPTI-FREE Express exceeded 4 log reduction for both strains of Acanthamoeba tested. We noted a substantial reduction in disinfection efficacy when CLCs were challenged with Fusarium in the presence of lenses and cases versus stand-alone testing. OPTI-FREE Express demonstrated significantly less net log reduction loss than the other four CLCs tested.ConclusionOf the popular CLCs on the global market, the product which relies on dual biocides polyquaternium-1 and myristamidopropyl dimethylamine demonstrated the highest disinfection efficacy in microbial disinfection challenges in the absence and presence of contact lenses.

Acanthamoeba keratitis is a painful, sight-threatening infection. It is commonly associated with the use of contact lens. Several lines of evidence suggest inadequate contact lens solutions especially against the cyst forms of pathogenic Acanthamoeba, indicating the need to develop effective disinfectants.In this work, the application and assessment of montmorillonite clay (Mt-clay), cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) and cetylpyridinium chloride-montmorillonite clay complex (CPC-Mt) against keratitis-causing A. castellanii belonging to the T4 genotype was studied.Adhesion to human cells and amoeba-mediated cytopathogenicity assays were conducted to determine the impact of Mt-clay, CPC and CPC-Mt complex on amoeba-mediated binding and host cell death. Furthermore, assays were also performed to determine inhibitory effects of Mt-clay, CPC and CPC-Mt complex on encystment and excystment. In addition, the cytotoxicity of Mt-clay, CPC and CPC-Mt complex against human cells was examined.The results revealed that CPC and CPC-Mt complex presented significant antiamoebic effects against A. castellanii at microgram dose. Also, the CPC and CPC-Mt complex inhibited amoebae binding to host cells. Furthermore, CPC and CPC-Mt complex, were found to inhibit the encystment and excystment processes. Finally, CPC and CPC-Mt complex showed minimal host cell cytotoxicity. These results show that CPC and CPC-Mt complex exhibit potent anti-acanthamoebic properties.Given the ease of usage, safety, cost-effectiveness and long-term stability, CPC and CPC-Mt complex can prove to be an excellent choice in the rational development of contact-lens disinfectants to eradicate pathogenic Acanthamoeba effectively.

SIGNIFICANCE This investigation examines the effectiveness of several common contact lens solutions in the disinfection of Acanthamoeba, which causes a serious eye infection most often resulting from dysfunctional or improper use of contact lens products. PURPOSE Acanthamoeba keratitis is an eye infection caused by a free-living amoeba, which can lead to extensive corneal damage and frequently blindness. Acanthamoeba keratitis is linked with contact lens use combined with noncompliance with contact lens care cleaning regimens. The patient's choice and use of multipurpose solutions (MPSs) continue to be a risk factor for Acanthamoeba keratitis. Thus, it is critical that the Acanthamoeba disinfection efficacy of the popular MPSs be determined. Here we compare the efficacy of seven major MPSs on the global market. METHODS Using standard methods of Acanthamoeba disinfection and quantification, Acanthamoeba ATCC 30461, 30868, 50370, and 50676 trophozoites were inoculated into each MPS and held for the manufacturer's recommended disinfection time. Acanthamoeba recovery plates were incubated for 14 days, after which positive wells were identified and cell concentrations determined using the 50% endpoint method. RESULTS Members of the OPTI-FREE products (Express, Replenish, and Puremoist [Alcon, Fort Worth, TX]) demonstrated significantly higher percentages of antimicrobial activity compared with the renu Advanced Formula (Bausch + Lomb, Rochester, NY), Biotrue (Bausch + Lomb), Acuvue RevitaLens (Johnson & Johnson, Santa Ana, CA), and Lite products (Cooper Vision, Scottsville, NY) for four of the trophozoite strains tested. CONCLUSIONS Many of the popular MPS biocides maintain little or no antimicrobial activity against Acanthamoeba trophozoites, and the number of biocides in an MPS does not necessarily indicate its antimicrobial activity.

To assess the influence of contemporary contact lens (CL) materials on human coronavirus attachment and the influence of a rub and rinse step to remove these viruses.The binding rates of HCoV-229E and HCoV-OC43 to eight soft CL materials and four rigid gas permeable materials were analyzed. The impact of a rub and rinse step to remove these viruses from all materials was examined. The efficacy of Biotrue (BauschLomb), OPTI-FREE Puremoist (Alcon), Clear Care (Alcon) and cleadew (Ophtecs) to remove virus contamination from two representative soft lens materials (etafilcon A and lotrafilcon B) was also determined.Approximately 10Human coronavirus contamination can be easily removed from CL surfaces. Although CL care products containing hydrogen peroxide and povidone-iodine efficiently removed virus contamination from CL surfaces without the need for a rub and rinse step, a full regimen including rub and rinse steps is crucial when using CL care products based on non-oxidative systems.

Purpose To evaluate the antiviral potential of five multipurpose disinfecting solutions against coronavirus (mouse hepatitis virus, a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 human corona virus). Methods Test solutions (Biotrue, renu Advanced [Bausch and Lomb], ACUVUE RevitaLens [Johnson and Johnson Vision], cleadew [Ophtecs corp.] or AOSept Plus [Alcon]) were mixed with the coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus at 104 plaque forming units (PFU)/mL as the final concentration and incubated at room temperature for the specified disinfection time. Surviving virus from each sample was then quantified by standard plaque forming unit assay and the reduction of PFU for each disinfectant was compared to the phosphate buffer saline (PBS) treated negative control. A regimen test was also conducted using Biotrue. Results The three multipurpose disinfecting solutions Biotrue (containing PHMB and polyquaternium-1), renu Advanced (PHMB, polyquaternium-1 and alexidine) and ACUVUE RevitaLens (polyquaternium-1 and alexidine) did not kill the coronavirus at the manufacturers recommended disinfection time in the stand alone test. After treatment, the virus’s titer (3.8 ± 0.2 log10 for Biotrue, 3.7 ± 0.1 log10 for renu and 3.7 ± 0.2 log10 for RevitaLens) was similar to the negative control (3.7 ± 0.1 log10; p ≥ 0.996). AOSept Plus (hydrogen peroxide) and cleadew (povidone iodine) significantly (p

SIGNIFICANCE Water exposure during contact lens wear can transfer pathogenic microorganisms to the eye, causing ocular complications. This study determined that water exposure is prevalent among lens wearers and is independently associated with higher case contamination. Contact lens compliance education to minimize water exposure should be reenforced by contact lens organizations and practitioners. PURPOSE Given the increasing association between water exposure and contact lens disease, this study aimed to explore the effect of water exposure and storage case contamination in soft contact lens users. METHODS A total of 165 daily soft lens wearers completed a self-administered questionnaire on contact lens hygiene. Lens cases were collected, and microbial analysis was conducted using an adenosine triphosphate assay (for overall microbial bioburden) and limulus amebocyte lysate assay (for endotoxin levels). The lens hygiene (excellent, >35; moderate, 28 to 35; poor, 1, poor) scores measured the compliance and water exposure during lens wear, respectively. Multiple regression determined the association between water behaviors and case contamination. RESULTS The average (standard deviation) age of participants was 28 (13.5) years (18 to 78 years), and 65% were female. The average overall microbial bioburden of storage cases was 3.10 (0.98) log colony-forming unit/mL (1.09 to 5.94 log colony-forming unit/mL). Forty-five percent of participants reported showering, 49.7% reported swimming while wearing lenses (65.4% of whom swam without goggles), 27.8% used wet hands to handle lenses, and 17.5% used tap water to rinse storage cases. Showering with lenses significantly increased the risk of higher storage case bioburden (P = .001), whereas using wet hands (P = .01) doubled the risk of higher case endotoxin levels (odds ratio, 2.41; confidence interval 1.19 to 4.86). CONCLUSIONS Water contact behavior while wearing lenses is prevalent among soft lens wearers and is associated with higher case contamination. Practitioners may improve contact lens education to reduce water exposure and case contamination to reduce the risk of lens-related adverse events.

In this study, we utilized a micelle–clay complex composed of the surfactant octadecyltrimethylammonium bromide and montmorillonite clay and evaluated its antibacterial effects. Using Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Micrococcus luteus, bactericidal assays were performed to determine the effects of ODTMA-clay complex on the viability of bacterial pathogen at various doses and different intervals of time. Cytotoxicity assays were performed to investigate ODTMA-clay complex effects on human cells, as determined by release of intracellular lactate dehydrogenase. The results revealed that ODTMA-clay complex abolished bacterial viability at 100 μg/mL within 45 min against P. aeruginosa, S. epidermidis, and M. luteus. Cytotoxicity assays revealed that ODTMA-clay complex exhibited minimal toxicity of the human cells. Rapid and potent antibacterial effects of ODTMA micelle–clay complex were observed in vitro; however, research is needed to determine precise formulation of contact lens disinfectants comprising ODTMA micelle–clay complex. Additionally, studies should be conducted using in vivo models of keratitis, progressing to pre-clinical and clinical trials. ODTMA micelle–clay complex is an ideal candidate to be incorporated in a novel contact lens disinfectant given the cost-effectiveness and ease of application and can be incorporated as an effective preventative strategy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE Symbols are commonly used to represent information of health care products included multipurpose solutions (MPSs) for contact lens (CL) care. BACKGROUND Little knowledge is available about recognition and comprehension by regular soft CL wearers of commonly used symbols in the instructions of CL MPSs marketed worldwide. METHODS CL wearers from the UK and Spain were invited to answer an anonymous on-line questionnaire (distributed though Facebook and Twitter) concerning the recognition and comprehension of seven common symbols (ISO 15223:2017 and EN 980:2008) included in MPS package instructions. RESULTS Answers of one hundred-ten soft CL wearers who use MPS (27 in the UK and 83 in Spain) were analysed showing low recognition and comprehension of the surveyed symbols even in wearers with > 5 years of CL wear (71.8%). The CE marked was the most recognised (96% in the UK and 88% in Spain, P = 0.29) and understood (78% in the UK and 85% in Spain, P = 0.25) symbol, but other important symbols, such as 'Caution' and 'Do not reuse', were under recognised (22% in the UK and 19% in Spain, P = 0.78 and 11% in the UK and 6% in Spain, P = 0.40 respectively) and understood (close to 30% in both countries P > 0.15). Participants with > 5 years of experience, showed slightly higher comprehension (P

A screw-based portable and simple solid phase microextraction device was fabricated by a 3D printer and used in combination with the developed silver-incorporated porous polyaniline film pencil lead solid-phase microextraction fiber (Ag/PANI SPME). Scanning electron microscopy revealed a porous structure of the electrodeposited Ag/PANI film. The spectrum from energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and the elemental map confirmed the presence of silver in the porous polymer film. It was used under stirring for the extraction of five phthalate esters: dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP) and di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP). The extracted solution was identified and quantified by gas chromatography using a flame ionization detector (GC-FID). Under the optimum conditions of the developed method, a good linearity was obtained in a concentration range of 5.0–1000 μg L−1 for all five phthalate esters with limits of detection (LODs) of 4.41 ± 0.91 μg L−1, 3.98 ± 0.92 μg L−1, 3.65 ± 0.74 μg L−1, 4.91 ± 0.52 μg L−1 and 4.25 ± 0.66 μg L−1 for DMP, DEP, DBP, BBP and DEHP, respectively. The developed method provided good precision when tested with standard solutions (RSD

To compare the efficacy of cleaning of rigid contact lenses using two care solutions with and without rubbing.A masked randomised trial was conducted. The cleaning efficacy of two solutions recommended for rigid contact lenses, a one-step hydrogen peroxide solution (HP) and a povidone iodine-based solution (PI), were evaluated on 64 unworn orthokeratology (ortho-k) lenses subsequent to cleaning with rubbing (R) with a surfactant cleaner or without rubbing (NR). Either mascara or hand cream was applied as a contaminant to the lenses to simulate stubborn and loosely bounded deposits, respectively. For each type of deposit, the lenses were randomly assigned to four cleaning treatments: R with HP, NR with HP, R with PI, and NR with PI (n = 8 for each group). Each lens surface was assessed on site by a masked examiner under a low-magnification slit-lamp and with photo-documentation. Lenses were graded according to the deposit coverage area using a pre-set five-point scale [0 (20% coverage) - 4 (80% coverage)].For stubborn deposits (mascara), NR failed to remove deposits from 94% of lenses, whilst R removed more than 80% of deposits from 63% of the lenses. For oily deposits, 25% of NR lenses had80% coverage, whilst only one R lens had 60-80% coverage, with 19% having 40-60% coverage, and 38% with either 20-40% or20%. Rubbing improved lens cleanliness for both types of deposits, but only reached statistical significance for the stubborn deposit group. There were no significant differences between the solutions.Not Rubbing and using either HP or PI solutions, is not effective in removing stubborn deposits from ortho-k lenses. It is essential to rub lenses when cleaning rigid lenses to ensure optimal lens hygiene for ocular health, especially as rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses are intended to be reused for at least a year before replacement. Rubbing with a daily cleaner should be included in the instructions for use of the solutions tested for rigid lenses and practitioners should be encouraged to emphasise the importance of rubbing in lens care.

Purpose To compare the biocompatibility and subjective symptoms of four multipurpose solutions marketed in Palestine with hydrogel contact lenses. Methods 50 habitual soft contact lens wearers were recruited in this interventional crossover study. Subjects were asked to attend the optometry clinic five times. A new pair of hydrogel lenses (Bioxifilcon-B) were fitted each time. This pair was soaked randomly overnight in one of the following four-multipurpose solutions (NEOPLUS®, AvizorUnicaSensitive®, ReNuMultiPlus® and COMPLETERevitaLens®) which contain different disinfecting agents (PHMB, Phx, PAPB, and PQ-1 + Alexidine, respectively), or non-preserved saline. At each visit, corneal staining, ocular redness and subjective symptoms were assessed. Results The percentage of corneal staining increased significantly (P ≤ 0.050) after soaking the lenses with PHMB (86%), PAPB (64%) and Phx (32%) based-solutions. However, a non-significant increase was noticed after the use of PQ-1 + Alexidine based solution (30%, P = 0.083). Ocular redness evaluation showed a significant increase (P ≤ 0.050) in limbal hyperemia after the use of all solutions, while bulbar redness was significantly increased after the use of biguanide-based solutions (P ≤ 0.050). The subjective assessment analysis showed a non-significant change in comfort, dryness, photophobia and scratchiness (P ≥ 0.050) at 2-h intervention using all solutions, except for the PHMB based solution which showed a significant change in subjective symptoms (P ≤ 0.050). Conclusion The combination of Bioxifilcon-B hydrogel contact lenses and solution containing PHMB, PAPB and Phx-disinfectants induced a significant increase in corneal staining after 2 h of CL-wear with a higher severity when the PHMB-based solution was used, while the PQ-1 + Alexidine-based solution did not. Only the PHMB-based solution triggered a significant change in subjective symptoms which might which suggests that it might be related to the severity of staining rather than the induction of staining.

This study assessed microbiome adherent to contact lenses and defined the bacterial communities associated with use of lens care solutions.Among 84 lenses screened for adherent ocular surface bacterial microbiome using 16S rRNA molecular amplification, 63 (75%) generated bacterial-specific amplicons processed using the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine workflow. Data were stratified by solution use (peroxide vs. polyhexamethylene biguanide [PHMB]-preserved multipurpose solution [MPS]). Diversity of lens-adherent microbiome was characterized using Shannon diversity index and richness index. Data were analyzed using principal components analysis and Kruskal-Wallis tests.We identified 19 phyla and 167 genera of bacteria adherent to the lenses. Proteobacteria was the most abundant phyla, followed by Firmicutes and Actinobacteria. The most abundant bacterial genera (1% abundance) were Ralstonia, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Halomonas, Corynebacterium, Staphylococcus, Acinetobacter, Shewanella, Rhodococcus, and Cobetia. Sixteen of 20 lenses (80%) negative for bacterial DNA were worn by participants using peroxide solutions while only 4 (20%) were MPS-treated lenses (P=0.004). Genera diversity of lens-adherent microbiome showed a significant increase in MPS-treated lenses compared with peroxide (P=0.038). Abundance of Corynebacterium, Haemophilus, and Streptococcus were increased 4.3-, 12.3-, and 2.7-fold, respectively, in the MPS group compared with peroxide (P=0.014, 0.006, 0.047, respectively).Commensal, environmental, and pathogenic bacteria known to be present in the conjunctival microbiome can be detected on worn contact lenses. Although most contact lenses worn by asymptomatic wearers harbor bacterial DNA, compared with peroxide, lenses stored in a PHMB-preserved MPS have more quantifiable, abundant, and diverse bacterial communities adherent to them.

The presence of biofilm in the lens case has been shown to be a risk factor for contamination of lenses and consequently microbial keratitis. This study aimed to evaluate effectiveness of solutions for rigid contact lenses in prevention and disruption of biofilm in lens cases and methods for biofilm detection.This study adopted a stepwise approach to evaluate effectiveness of four rigid lens disinfecting solutions against biofilm. These included two polyhexamethylene bigiuanide (PHMB) solutions and a chlorhexidine/PHMB-based solution, as well as a novel povidone-iodine formulation. The presence of biofilm following exposure to the solutions was assessed using both crystal violet (CV) staining and MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) viability assay, taking into account the effect of lens case design. Three lens case designs, conventional flat, large bucket type, and cylindrical cases, were investigated for the ability to trap stain and allow biofilm formation.Considerable differences were noted between solutions in their ability to prevent and disrupt biofilm (p 0.001). Lens case design greatly influenced optical density (OD) measurements even in negative controls, as cylindrical cases trapped more stain, increasing OD readings. Correcting for this factor reduced variations, but could not differentiate between residues and biofilm. MTT assay revealed that both povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine-containing solutions could effectively kill 95% of organisms, whilst PHMB-based solutions were less effective with up to 55% of staphylococci and 41% of Pseudomonas surviving at 24 h.Biofilm can rapidly form in lens cases and may not be killed by disinfecting solutions. Of the solutions tested, none were able to prevent biofilm formation or disrupt established biofilm, but those containing chlorhexidine or povidone iodine were able to penetrate the biofilm and kill organisms. Assessment of biofilm by CV assay may be confounded by lens case design. Whilst CV assay can demonstrate presence of biofilm, this technique should be accompanied by viability assay to determine bactericidal activity.

An estimated 45 million U.S. residents enjoy the benefits of contact lens wear, but many of them might be at increased risk for complications stemming from improper wear and care behaviors (1). One of the most serious complications of contact lens wear is a corneal infection known as microbial keratitis, which can sometimes result in reduced vision or blindness (2). In 2014, 50% of contact lens wearers reported ever sleeping in contact lenses, and 55% reported topping off* their contact lens solutions (3), which put them at greater risk for a contact lens-related eye infection (2,4). Data on communication between eye care providers and contact lens wearers on contact lens wear and care recommendations are limited. Two surveys were conducted to better understand and assess contact lens education about nine recommendations: the first assessed contact lens wearer experiences regarding recommendations received from eye care providers during their most recent appointment; the second evaluated provider-reported practices for communicating contact lens wear and care recommendations to their patients. One third (32.9%) of contact lens wearers aged ≥18 years recalled never hearing any lens wear and care recommendations. Fewer than half (47.9%) recalled hearing their provider recommend not sleeping in lenses at their last visit, and 19.8% recalled being told to avoid topping off their contact lens solution. A majority of providers reported sharing recommendations always or most of the time at initial visits, regular checkups, and complication-related visits. Providers reported sharing nearly all recommendations more frequently at initial and complication-related visits than at regular checkups. Of the nine recommendations for safe contact lens wear and care, eye care providers at regular checkups most often recommend complying with the recommended lens replacement schedules (85% of regular visits), not sleeping in lenses (79.0% of regular visits), and not topping off solutions (64.4% of regular visits). Eye care providers play an important role in the health of their contact lens-wearing patients and can share health communication messages with their patients to help educate them about healthy wear and care habits. These findings can assist in the creation of health communication messages to help encourage eye care providers to communicate more effectively with their patients.

To compare the antimicrobial effects of CLEAR CARE, a 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) solution formulated for simultaneous cleaning, daily protein removal, disinfection, and storage of soft (hydrophilic) hydrogel, silicone hydrogel, and gas-permeable contact lenses, and CLEAR CARE PLUS, consisting of the 3% H2O2 solution plus a novel wetting agent, polyoxyethylene-polyoxybutylene (EOBO-21).Three lots each of the 2 solutions were incubated with 5 compendial microorganisms required by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 510(k) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14729 stand-alone procedures, 4 clinical isolates of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and trophozoites and cysts of 2 Acanthamoeba strains that are associated with microbial keratitis. Microbial loads were evaluated after disinfection and neutralization.Both solutions exceeded the FDA/ISO stand-alone primary criteria against Gram-positive and Gram-negative compendial bacteria, yeast, and mold after only 1.5-hr disinfection/neutralization. At the recommended minimum disinfection time, bacteria were reduced by 4.4 to 5.1 logs, yeast by 4.4 to 4.9 logs, and mold by 2.9 to 3.5 logs with and without organic soil. In addition, both solutions eliminated or effectively reduced populations of clinically relevant ocular bacterial isolates (4.5-5.0 logs), Acanthamoeba trophozoites (3.4-4.2 logs), and cysts (1.5-2.1 logs).Both solutions eliminated or reduced populations of FDA/ISO compendial bacteria and fungi as well as clinically relevant microorganisms and Acanthamoeba trophozoites and cysts. The addition of EOBO-21 to the 3% H2O2 lens care solution had no impact on antimicrobial activity.

Despite their established disinfection and safety benefits, the use of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) lens care systems among today's wearers of reusable contact lenses remains low in comparison with multipurpose solution (MPS) use. Multipurpose solution systems, however, present several potential drawbacks that may impact patient outcomes, including the use of chemical preservatives for disinfection, biocompatibility issues, and challenges with respect to lens care compliance. Given their unique composition and mechanism of action, one-step H2O2 systems offer the opportunity to avoid many of the challenges associated with MPS use. This article reviews the evolution of H2O2 lens care systems and examines the current scientific and clinical evidence regarding the relative ease of use, lens and tissue compatibility, disinfection efficacy, and ocular surface safety of H2O2 systems. Evaluation of the available data indicates that in comparison with MPS, one-step H2O2 systems tend to promote more favorable compliance, efficacy, comfort, and ocular surface outcomes for a wide range of contact lens-wearing patients. Based on the current published evidence, the authors recommend that eye care practitioners consider making one-step H2O2 systems their first-line contact lens care recommendation for most wearers of reusable lenses.

Introduction Various Acanthamoeba species are free-living organisms widely distributed in the human environment. Amphizoic amoebae as facultative parasites may cause vision-threatening eye disease – Acanthamoeba keratitis, mostly among contact lens wearers. As the number of cases is increasing, and applied therapy often unsuccessful, proper hygienic measures and effective contact lenses disinfection are crucial for the prevention of this disease. Available contact lens solutions are not fully effective against amphizoic amoebae; there is a need to enhance their disinfecting activity to prevent amoebic infections. The use of developing nanotechnology methods already applied with success in the prevention, diagnostic and therapy of other infectious diseases might be helpful regarding amoebic keratitis. This study assesses the in vitro effect of selected contact lens solutions conjugated with nanoparticles against Acanthamoeba trophozoites. Material and methods Three selected contact lens solutions conjugated with silver and gold nanoparticles in concentration of 0.25–2.5 ppm were used in vitro against the axenically cultured ATCC 30010 type Acanthamoeba castellanii strain. The anti-amoebic efficacy was examined based on the oxido-reduction of AlamarBlue. The cytotoxicity tests based on the measurement of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity were performed using a fibroblast HS-5 cell line. Results Enhancement of the anti-amoebic activity of contact lens solutions conjugated with selected nanoparticles expressed in the dose dependent amoebic growth inhibition with a low cytotoxicity profile was observed. Conclusions Results of the study showed that conjugation of selected contact lens solutions with silver nanoparticles might be a promising approach to prevent Acanthamoeba keratitis among contact lens users.

Biofilm formation caused by infrequent contact lens case replacement and the ineffectiveness of multi-purpose solutions (MPS) on biofilm removal is associated with high rates of bacterial keratitis infections. This study demonstrated biofilm elimination from the contact lens case by microwave irradiation.Staphylococcus aureus biofilms indicative of 3-9 months of contact wear were cultured in contact lens cases and visualized with crystal violet (CV) staining. Biofilms in contact cases were then exposed to four treatment regimens: No treatment (n = 8), 45 s microwave irradiation (n = 8), tap water (n = 6), and MPS (n = 9). Bacterial survival was assessed by colony forming unit (CFU) assay using streak dilutions.Visualization of the biofilms through CV staining revealed that biofilms coalesce between ribs of the contact case. In 5/8 cases no CFU were cultivated from the case after treatment with microwave irradiation. In tap water and MPS the first dilution averaged 6 ± 2 and 31 ± 13 CFUs per plate, respectively, while microwave irradiation averaged 1 CFU per plate. In Dilution 2, the average reduced to 0.7 ± 0.7 and 6 ± 5 CFUs per plate for tap water and MPS, respectively, while microwave irradiation had 0 CFUs in Dilution 2.Biofilms that coalesce between the ribs of the contact case pose a threat because this area is difficult to thoroughly scrub and could act as a basis for infection through fouling of contact lenses. Of the four treatment regimens, microwave irradiation displayed the most consistent and highest rate of bacterial eradication. Tap water was less effective compared to microwave irradiation, and poses other harmful side effects, but greatly reduced CFU count compared to no treatment. MPS displayed the poorest bacterial eradication of the treatments. Thus, microwave irradiation is worth further investigation as a viable in-home disinfecting option.

Significance Scleral lenses have become a widely used treatment option for patients with irregular corneas and ocular surface disease. Successful wear entails use of a nonpreserved saline solution to fill the lens before application on the eye. Purpose The purposes of this study were to evaluate solution from opened bottles of multidose preservative-free saline for microbiological growth and to better understand study participant hygiene habits while handling these bottles for scleral lens wear. Methods Eligible study participants in this single-center prospective study were patients who routinely used multidose preservative-free saline solution for scleral lens rinsing and filling. Study participants completed a 12-question survey regarding their scleral lens hygiene habits and donated their opened multidose preservative-free saline bottle (PuriLens Plus; The Lifestyle Company, Inc., Freehold, NJ), which was processed for bacterial and fungal cultures. Results Thirty-five participants (19 males, 16 females) with ages ranging from 6 to 81 years (mean, 47.9 years) were included. Indications for scleral lens wear included those with irregular corneas and ocular surface disease. The overall rate of microbial contamination among saline samples was 62.9% (n = 22). Twenty-one different microorganisms were identified. The survey responses did not differ significantly (P > .05) for any of the questions with regard to likelihood of positive culture. There were no significant age or sex differences between participants with positive or negative culture results. No significant differences were found between isolation of specific microorganisms and any of the survey responses. Conclusions This study suggests that off-label multidose preservative-free saline commonly used to rinse and fill scleral lenses before application on the eye may become contaminated with microorganisms once the bottle has been opened. Eye care practitioners and scleral lens patients should be aware of these potential contaminations and prioritize lens, hand, and environmental hygiene to minimize the risk of ocular complications.

SIGNIFICANCE This study provides insight into the current recommendations, clinical behaviors, and risk assessments of eye care professionals on the topic of rigid contact lens exposure to tap water. This knowledge may motivate professional organizations to develop initiatives to educate eye care professionals on the dangers of contact lens exposure to water. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate the practice patterns and risk perceptions of eye care professionals regarding gas-permeable contact lens exposure to tap water. METHODS A branched-logic survey was started by 320 clinicians, vision scientists, and industry personnel and was fully completed by 272 participants. The survey queried participants about their current practices, recommendations, and perceptions of risk regarding exposure of gas-permeable contact lenses to tap water. RESULTS Of those who prescribe gas-permeable contact lenses, 57.4% reported rinsing lenses with tap water, whereas only 32.7% reported engaging in this same behavior in front of patients. Of those who reported never rinsing lenses with tap water, 85.6% indicated that rinsing lenses with water increases infection risk, whereas 52.1% of those who rinse lenses with water reported the same perceived risk (P < .001). Of all participants, 60% indicated that wearing contact lenses while showering increases infection risk, and 50.2% of all participants advised patients to avoid this behavior. CONCLUSIONS A discrepancy exists between perceptions of risk concerning exposure of contact lenses to water and both clinical practices and patient education provided by professionals.

Objective The study aimed to assess contact lens (CL) wear and care habits among adults in Sudan. Design An observational, non-interventional, multi-center, cross-sectional study was conducted in the CL departments of all the eye hospitals and centers, and optical centers in the Khartoum State, Sudan. Participants Established CL wearers residing in Khartoum State, Sudan. Main outcomes and measures CL wear profile, CL usage habits, hand and CL hygiene habits were assessed using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Results The average age of the 442 participants was 24.57 (± 4.87) years. Women comprised 92% of the sample. Smoking was reported by 15.8% of the sample. 81.9% wore soft spherical CL, with 43.4% of the participants were prescribed CL on a yearly replacement schedule. Only 68.3% were prescribed CL by an eye care practitioner. Multipurpose solutions were used by 78.8% of the sample to clean CL, and by 52% to clean the lens case. Compliance rate for CL wear and care among participants was 81.1%. None of the participants reported sharing CL or CL case and rinsing the case with tap water. High compliance level was observed for overnight wear; swimming and showering with CL; handwashing before CL insertion; and cleaning of CL. Moderate compliance rates were recorded for cleaning and replacing lens case, and topping up or sharing solution. Low compliance was noted for attending after care visits. Conclusions and relevance CL wearers in Sudan exhibit high to moderate levels of compliance to most contact lens wear and care aspects, except for attending aftercare visits. CL practitioners in Sudan are encouraged to prescribe CL appropriate to the lifestyle and economic situation of patients and actively recommend care products. In addition, practitioners need to follow up with patients to attend aftercare appointments, where hygienic wear and care habits should be emphasized.

BACKGROUND Ophthalmic products are a common but often overlooked contributor to allergic contact dermatitis. Frequency of allergenic ingredients in over-the-counter ophthalmic products has not been well characterized. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of allergenic ingredients in most commonly bought eye lubricants and contact lens solutions. METHODS A product list of Amazon.com's best-selling ophthalmic products was curated by searching for "Best Sellers in Eye Drops, Lubricants & Washes" and "Best Sellers in Contact Lens Care Products." For exploratory analysis, indication, price, consumer ratings, number of reviews, and US Food and Drug Administration approval status were recorded. The products' ingredients were compiled using NLM DailyMed, and products that had 1 or more allergens or relevant cross-reactors on either the 2018 American Contact Dermatitis Society Core Allergen Series or the 2015-2016 North American Contact Dermatitis Group Standard Allergen Series were noted. RESULTS Forty-eight percent (n = 49) of the total products, (57.8% [n = 37] of eye lubricants, and 31.6% [n = 12] of contact lens solutions) had 1 or more allergens or associated cross-reactors. Identified allergens were benzalkonium chloride, propylene glycol, sorbic acid, amidoamine, sorbitan sesquioleate, chlorhexidine digluconate, lanolin alcohol, parabens, benzyl alcohol, and butylated hydroxytoluene. CONCLUSIONS Awareness of potential allergens is crucial to diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis to ophthalmic products and helping patients navigate online pharmacological chaos.

Background Acanthamoeba spp. are one of the free-living amoeba that spread worldwide causing keratitis. Owing to the increase in the use of lenses, whether for medical or cosmetic purposes, the incidence of disease increases every year. Contamination of the lenses with the Acanthamoeba trophozoites or cysts may lead to eye infection and cause sight-threatening keratitis in human. We isolated Acanthamoeba spp. from new lenses, used lenses, and contact lens disinfecting solutions and identified them based on morphological characteristics and molecular test. Methods New and used lenses and contact lens disinfecting solutions were cultured on monogenic media. Light and scanning electron microscope was used to identify Acanthamoeba spp. morphological features. Genotype identification was also evaluated using PCR sequencing of 18S rRNA gene specific primer pair JDP1 and JDP2. Results A hundred samples were examined, 29 (29%) were infected with Acanthamoeba spp. That belonged to two strains of Acanthamoeba (Acanthamoeba 41 and Acanthamoeba 68). 18S rRNA of the Acanthamoeba 41 had 99.69% sequence identity to Acanthamoeba castellanii clone HDU-JUMS-2, whereas Acanthamoeba 68 had 99.74% similar pattern to that of Acanthamoeba sp. isolate T4 clone ac2t4 that are morphologically identified as Acanthamoeba polyphaga. The obtained data revealed that the isolated strains belong to T4 genotype that was evolutionarily similar to strains isolated in Iran. Conclusions Cosmetic lenses and disinfectant solutions are a major transmissible mode for infection. This genotype is common as the cause of Acanthamoeba keratitis. To avoid infection, care must be taken to clean the lenses and their preservative solutions and prevent contamination with the parasite.