Search

What is known and objectives The French Society of Clinical Pharmacy has developed a website, named Act-IP©, enabling hospital pharmacists to document and analyse pharmacists' interventions (PIs) proposed during medication order review when a drug-related problem is detected. This study analyses PIs documented in Act-IP© and assesses factors associated with physicians' acceptance of PIs. Methods PIs documented into Act-IP© over a 30-month period were analysed. Independent predictors of physicians' acceptance were assessed using multiple logistic regression. Results and discussion A total of 34 522 PIs were registered by 201 pharmacists working in 59 hospitals. PIs were mostly related to 'dose adjustment' (25%), 'drug discontinuation' (20%) and 'drug switch' (19%). Of the 43 343 medications involved, 28% targeted drugs acting on the central nervous system, 17% anti-infective drugs and 16% cardiovascular drugs. Sixty-eight per cent of PIs were accepted by physicians (15% refusals and 17% non-assessable). Physicians' acceptance was significantly associated with 1/ drug group: antineoplastics and immunomodulators (OR = 2·29, CI 95[1·94-2·69]), anti-infectives (OR = 1·19, CI 95 [1·11-1·28]); 2/ type of intervention: drug switch (OR = 1·54, CI 95 [1·43-1·65]), drug discontinuation (OR = 1·38, CI 95 [1·29-1·48]), administration modality optimization (OR = 1·19, CI 95 [1·11-1·29]), addition of a new drug (OR = 1·12, CI 95 [1·00-1·24]); 3/ ward specialty: paediatrics (OR = 1·83, CI 95 [1·24-2·70]) and intensive care (OR = 1·34, CI 95 [1·10-1·64]); 4/ level of pharmacist integration in the ward: higher when the pharmacist is regularly in the ward compared with occasionally (OR = 0·74, CI 95 [0·70-0·79]) or never (OR = 0·68, CI 95 [0·60-0·75]) present. What is new and conclusion This study highlights the role of routine pharmacist review of medication orders to prevent drug-related problems and gives new insights for a successful collaboration between physicians and pharmacists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The French Health Authority recently published guidelines about patient self-administration of medications for voluntary hospitalized patients under medical supervision. This study aimed to assess medication management practices in our hospital and provide recommendations for self-administration medication. A prospective monocentric study was performed from January to June 2023, involving patient and nurse surveys based on the guidelines from the French Health Authority. A total of 207 patients participated in the survey, with a mean age of 59.6years. Among them, 56% were inclined to self-manage treatments initiated during hospitalization. Among patients with regular treatments, 62% were inclined to self-manage them in the hospital. In weekday hospitalization units, 92% of patients were inclined to self-manage their regular treatments, and 75% of those initiated during hospitalization. Among the 26 surveyed nurses, 71% reported patient autonomy for taking drugs in narrative transmissions, and 88% verified medication intake through self-administration, while 96% digitally traced it. The concept of self-administration of medication appears promising, especially within weekday hospitalization units, particularly for patients with a good understanding of their treatment. Nurses currently assess patient autonomy without specific monitoring tools. Collaborative efforts among healthcare professionals, with pharmacists playing a central role, are essential for the success of this innovative approach., (Copyright © 2024 Académie Nationale de Pharmacie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: National and international scientific societies advocate for a regular, systematic, and standardized global evaluation of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients. However, there are no recommendations specifying the content of this global evaluation. This initiative aimed to propose a standardized reporting framework, using evidence-based and consensus approaches, to collect data on all domains of axSpA., Methods: A literature review and consensus process involved a steering committee and an expert panel of 37 rheumatologists and health professionals. The first steering committee took place in March 2022 and identified the main domains for inclusion in the standardized report. A hierarchical literature review was conducted to identify items within these domains and tools for assessment. The items and tools for assessment were discussed and consensus was reached through a vote session during an expert meeting that took place in March 2023., Results: The steering committee identified four main domains to include in the standardized reporting framework: disease assessment, comorbidities, lifestyle, and quality of life. Items and tools for assessment were adopted after the expert meeting. Additionally, recommendations regarding digital tools (websites, apps, social media) were provided., Conclusion: This initiative led to a consensus, based on evidence and expertise, on a reporting framework for use during periodic systematic global evaluations of axSpa in daily practice., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Prescribing errors related to computerized physician order entry are current and may have serious consequences for patients. They can be detected by pharmacists during prescriptions analysis and lead to pharmacist's interventions. In France, few monocentric studies have studied Pharmacist Interventions triggered by prescribing errors identified as System-Related Errors (PISREs) in French hospitals. However, their respective analysis method prevent any comparison between computerized physician order entry systems in order to identify the safest and rule out the most dangerous. A computerized physician prescribing error related to the software is characterized by its causes, consequences and mechanism of occurrence. US researchers have developed and validated a tool to classify and illustrate these three characteristics. The objectives of this article are to present this tool, to propose a French adaptation and to describe the perspectives analyze and understand prescription errors related to computerized physician order entry based on data of Act-IP©. The adaptation was performed using PISREs extracted from the Act-IP© observatory of the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy. Each item of the codification is illustrated with an example of PI. We are considering a training plan in order to allow wide use of this tool. Once adopted this tool, the next step will be to organize a prospective multicenter study including as many computerized prescription order entry systems as possible. The aim of this study will be identifying the safest systems. Consequently, it will then be possible to have arguments to qualify the most dangerous and thus propose their withdrawal from the market., (Copyright © 2023 Académie Nationale de Pharmacie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Biologics (bDMARDs) have revolutionized the prognosis of patients with inflammatory arthritis, but are not without serious side effects. The patient must be able to identify them, acquire self-care abilities or skills and adhere to their treatment. Multidisciplinary consultations, including a pharmaceutical consultation could improve the care of these patients. The pharmaceutical presence make it easier to switch to a biosimilar with etended patient support thanks to the community-hospital network. The return on investment is possible thanks to the more frequent use of biosimilars and the pricing of this type of consultation by the "Forfait de Prestation Intermédiaire"., Methodology: Eligible patients are patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis, treated with subcutaneous bDMARDs. The criteria assessed were patient's knowledge of their biotherapy using the Biosecure score, their medication adherence using the CQR-5, the total of switch to biosimilars perform and the financial statement of the consultations. An assessment of the actions deployed for the community-hospital network., Results: Two hundred and ninety-five patients (47.4%) benefited multidisciplinary consultation. The mean score of the Biosecure score was 69.6/100 (moderate knowledge) and 261 patients (88.5%) were highly adherent. 57 patients (73%) accepted the switch to biosimilar. 197 pharmacy were contacted, all of witch for patients who receive the switch. Overall patient's satisfaction was 26.9/28., Conclusion: Multidisciplinary consultations with involvement of the pharmacist should optimized patient care and the management of outpatients treated with bDMARDs. Patients have already expressed their satisfaction with this course of care and the return on investment is positive., (Copyright © 2022 Académie Nationale de Pharmacie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Patients treated with oral anticoagulants need an adapted education in order to optimize the management of these treatments. The objective was to assess the knowledge of patients before and after a pharmaceutical interview carried out by pharmacy students on digital tablets at the hospital., Methods: A prospective study took place in the cardiology department, with a first phase from December 2016 to June 2018. Patient's knowledge were assessed during a pharmaceutical interview; additional informations were done for unacquired concepts. The second phase took place in October 2018, and patient's knowledge were assessed during a phone call for patients who had at least given one wrong answer on the four selected questions., Results: Sixty-eight and twenty-two patients were included respectively for phases 1 and 2 (mean age=70±3.4; treatments number=8.2±0.9). 36 patients were treated by Vitamin K antagonists and 32 by direct oral anticoagulants. 57% of patients with oral anticoagulants gave a good answer for principles of the treatment and the surveillance during phase 1, and 33% for signs of overdose. A significant improvement for the 22 patients with poor knowledge was observed in phase 2 (1.73 vs. 2.5; P=0.006)., Conclusions: The playful interview improves the patient's knowledge over time. Developing the relationship between the hospital and community pharmacists would allow us to optimize the patient follow-up., (Copyright © 2021 Académie Nationale de Pharmacie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Despite several studies proving the efficacy and safety of biosimilars compared with original drugs, switching to a biosimilar remains challenging when the decision is at the discretion of physicians with mandatory consent from patients. Educating patients about biosimilars seems important to increase the prescription rate of biosimilars. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a clinical pharmacist consultation on the switch to and retention rate of a biosimilar for patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases., Methods: This retrospective study compared 2 groups of adult patients receiving (intervention) or not (control) a consultation with a pharmacist right before the rheumatologist consultation. The primary outcome was the frequency of patients who switched to a biosimilar at the end of the rheumatologist visit., Results: We analysed 141 patients (50% women, 50±15years old, on original adalimumab (62%) or etanercept (38%)) who had never used biosimilars: 85 in the intervention group and 56 in the control group. The switch rate to a biosimilar significantly differed between the groups: 69.4% versus 41.1% in the intervention group versus the control group respectively (P<0.01). After a 1-year follow-up period, 72.5% versus 81.3% of patients who switched were still on biosimilar in the intervention versus control group respectively., Conclusions: This study highlights the positive impact of a pharmacist consultation before the physician's one on switching to a biosimilar, but more studies are needed to assess the impact of this pharmacist consultation on preventing the nocebo effect and therefore on improving the retention rate of biosimilars., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To study in daily practice the risk of immunogenicity of patients treated with the biosimilar rituximab (RTX) GP2013 used for chronic inflammatory rheumatic disorders., Methods: A prospective monocentric routine care study was carried out between September 2018 and May 2021, including consecutive patients treated with the biosimilar RTX GP2013. Biosamples were taken before each infusion to quantify anti-RTX antibodies (ADAbs) and serum RTX trough levels by ELISA (Lisa Tracker Duo Rituximab, LTR005, Theradiag)., Results: 168 GP2013-treated patients were included (129 who switched from originator RTX and 39 originator RTX naïve). The analysis of 602 samples identified 15 patients (8%) with positive ADAbs including 6 and 9 with transient and persistent ADAbs, respectively. The switch from originator RTX to GP2013 did not increase the risk of immunogenicity, with an incidence rate of 0.8 for 100 patient years. The frequency of persistent ADAs was higher in non-RA patients (5/56, 9% vs. 4/112, 3.5%). Patients with positive persistent ADAbs were more frequently non-caucasian (7/9, 78%, vs. 56/159, 35%, p<0.01) and all had detectable circulating B cells (vs. 40% in ADAb-negative patients, P<0.001). ADAb positivity was not associated with disease activity or RTX discontinuation but patients with ADAb titers >100 ng/mL experienced reduced treatment efficacy or severe infusion-related reaction., Conclusion: Within the study duration, the immunogenicity of GP2013 is a rare event affecting the pharmacodynamics of RTX. Although development of ADAbs had no impact on treatment discontinuation, possible harmful consequences may be observed in patients with high antibody levels., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest JA: Honoraria: Galapagos, Lilly, Pfizer, Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Roche-Chugai, Nordic Pharma, Medac, Novartis, Biogen, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, and MSD. Research grants: Pfizer (Passerelle), Novartis (Dreamer), Fresenius kabi. AM: Honoraria: Abbvie, UCB, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Janssen, BMS, Biogen, MSD, Galapagos; Grants: UCB, Pfizer (Passerelle). CMR: Abbvie, GSK, Lilly, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Galapagos, BMS; Grants: Roche, Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Novartis, Biogen, Mylan, (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Computerised physician order entry (CPOE) systems facilitate the review of medication orders by pharmacists. Reports have emerged that show conception flaws or the misuse of CPOE systems generate prescribing errors. We aimed to characterise pharmacist interventions (PIs) triggered by prescribing errors identified as system-related errors (PISREs) in French hospitals., Design: This was a cross-sectional observational study based on PIs prospectively documented in the Act-IP observatory database from January 2014 to December 2018., Setting: PISREs from 319 French computerised healthcare facilities were analysed., Participants: Among the 319 French hospitals, 232 (72.7%) performed SRE interventions, involving 652 (51%) pharmacists., Results: Among the 331 678 PIs recorded, 27 058 were qualified as due to SREs (8.2%). The main drug-related problems associated with PISREs were supratherapeutic (27.5%) and subtherapeutic dosage (17.2%), non-conformity with guidelines/contraindications (22.4%) and improper administration (17.9%). The PI prescriber acceptation rate was 78.9% for SREs vs 67.6% for other types of errors. The PISRE ratio was estimated relative to the total number of PIs. Concerning the certification status of CPOE systems, the PISRE ratio was 9.4% for non-certified systems vs 5.5% for certified systems (p<0.001). The PISRE ratio for senior pharmacists was 9.2% and that for pharmacy residents 5.4% (p<0.001). Concerning prescriptions made by graduate prescribers and those made by residents, the PISRE ratio was 8.4% and 7.8%, respectively (p<0.001)., Conclusion: Computer-related prescribing errors are common. The PI acceptance rate by prescribers was higher than that observed for PIs that were not CPOE related. This suggests that physicians consider the potential clinical consequences of SREs for patients to be more frequently serious than interventions unrelated to CPOE. CPOE medication review requires continual pharmacist diligence to catch these errors. The significantly lower PISRE ratio for certified software should prompt patient safety agencies to undertake studies to identify the safest software and discard software that is potentially dangerous., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: In spondyloarthritis (SpA), improving patients' knowledge on their biologics is a key factor to enhance adherence. The information given to the patient has to ensure the acquisition of safety skills regarding their treatment. The aims of this trial were to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist's educational interview on knowledge and adherence to biologics in these patients., Methods: Consecutive adult patients with well-controlled axial SpA, stable on biologics were enrolled in a randomised, controlled, single-centre, open-label, 6-month trial. A pharmacist's educational interview provided information on biologics management at baseline in the intervention group and at month 6 in the control group. The changes in a weighted knowledge score concerning the management of biologics and the change in the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) at month-6 were primary outcomes. The changes in disease activity (BASDAI) and patients' satisfaction regarding the pharmacists' interview were secondary outcomes., Results: Patients' characteristics at baseline were comparable among the 89 included patients (46 in the intervention group, 43 in the control group). The patient's knowledge score concerning biologics management improved at a greater magnitude in the educational group (+11.0±11.5 vs. +3.0 ±10.6 in the intervention versus the control group, respectively, p<0.0001). There was also a trend in a better adherence (+2.2±13.9 vs. -0.6±18.9 in the intervention versus the control group, respectively, p=0.691). The disease activity remained stable in both groups., Conclusions: This study is strongly in favour of the benefit of a pharmacist's educational interview in the management of patients with axial SpA.

Objectives: Clinical pharmacists' interventions (PIs) are an important element in ensuring good pharmaceutical care. We aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive multidimensional tool for assessing the potential impact of PIs for daily practice of medication review., Methods: Experts of the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy (SFPC) developed the CLinical, Economic and Organisational (CLEO) tool, consisting of three independent dimensions concerning clinical, economic and organisational impact. They were asked to analyse 30 scenarios of PIs, and re-rated 10 PIs with a washout of 1 month (internal validation). Then, seven external experts not involved in the development of the tool rated 60 scenarios collected when using the CLEO in daily practice. Inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were determined by calculation of the intra-class correlation (ICC A,1 ). Users' satisfaction and acceptability of the tool were assessed on a 7-level Likert scale with a 17-item questionnaire., Results: For internal reliability, the inter-rater reliability for the CLEO tool was good for clinical dimensions (ICC A,1 =0.693), excellent for economic dimensions (ICC A,1 =0.815) and fair for organisational dimensions (ICC A,1 =0.421); and the intra-rater reliability was good for clinical dimensions (ICC A,1 =0.822), excellent for economic dimensions (ICC A,1 =0.918) and good for organisational dimensions (ICC A,1 =0.738). For external reliability, the inter-rater reliability was good for clinical dimensions (ICC A,1 =0.649), excellent for economic dimensions (ICC A,1 =0.814) and fair for organisational dimensions (ICC A,1 =0.500). CLEO was viewed as relevant (mean±SD 4.93±1.27), acceptable (4.81±1.78), practicable (5.56±1.45) and precise (5.38±1.47)., Conclusions: CLEO is a comprehensive tool assessing clinical, economic and organisational impacts of PIs which has been developed, validated and was reliable and feasible for use in routine clinical practice., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© European Association of Hospital Pharmacists 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To evaluatre the risk of immunogenicity in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases who experienced successive non-medical swiches to different biosimilars infliximab., Patients and Methods: Observational study over a 3-year observation period assessing the risk of immunogenicity in i) patients in maintenance therapy with innovator infliximab who were successively switched to CT-P13, then to SB2 (cohort-1) and ii) biologic-naive patients initiated with CT-P13 before being switched to SB2 (cohort-2). A propotion meta-analysis was also performed, integrating our results to 16 additional studies., Results: Cohort-1 included 265 patients who switched to CT-P13, and 140 patients were subsequently switched to SB2. Among the 235 anti-drug antibody (ADA)-free patients at baseline, 20 patients (8.5%) developed ADA over the 3-year observation period (rate of 3 for 100 patient years). Cohort-2 included 44 patients, of whom 29 subsequently switched to SB2. A total of 11 patients (25%) developed ADA within 3 years (rate of 14 for 100 patients years). We found no influence of the number of biosimilars infliximab received on ADA deveopment in both cohorts. The risk of treatment discontinuation was significantly higher in patients with positive ADA in both cohorts. The meta-analysis including our data exposed an incidence of immunogenicity of 4.7% (95% CI 3.5-6.1%) after the switch from innovator infliximab to biosimilar infliximab and 21.1% (95% CI 13.1-30.3%) in patients initiating biosimilar infliximab., Conclusion: Immunogenicity was not favored by successive non-medical switches to biosimilars infliximab in our study, but was associated with treatment discontinuation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate effectiveness of systematic switching treatment from innovator infliximab to biosimilar infliximab, and its associated factors., Methods: In this prospective observational study, all adult patients receiving maintenance therapy with innovator infliximab in Cochin University Hospital were systematically switched to biosimilar infliximab. Effectiveness was assessed by the retention rate of biosimilar infliximab at the time of the third infusion. Sensitivity analyses for effectiveness included changes of disease activity parameters and infliximab trough levels between baseline and the last visit as well as the occurrence of adverse events leading to drug discontinuation. Factors associated with biosimilar infliximab discontinuation at the last visit were explored., Results: A total of 260 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including 31 rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 131 axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and 64 inflammatory bowel diseases. The retention rate was 85% (221/260 patients) at the time of the third biosimilar infusion. Between baseline and the last visit (mean follow-up of 34 weeks), 59 patients (23%) discontinued biosimilar infliximab, mainly due to experienced inefficacy (n = 47, 80%). No clinical or biological factors were associated with biosimilar discontinuation. No serious adverse events occurred. No change in objective disease activity parameters or infliximab trough levels was detected. However, a significant increase of BASDAI (2.94 ± 2.20 vs. 3.18 ± 2.21, P = 0.046, before vs. after switch, respectively) was observed in patients with axSpA. Innovator infliximab was re-established in 47/59 patients (80%)., Conclusion: No changes in drug trough levels or objective parameters were observed after the systematic switch to biosimilar infliximab in a real clinical practice setting. Only changes in patient-reported outcomes were observed, suggesting attribution effects rather than pharmacological differences., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Combination of alpha-blockers with potent CYP3A4 inhibitors is either contra-indicated or not recommended. We searched data supporting this classification and guiding prescribers when such an interaction occurs., Methods: We analyzed reports published by the French agency for drug safety, reference books and performed search in databases of pharmacokinetics studies and case or case series related with these interactions., Results: The classification of the potential severity of these interactions defined by the French agency for drug safety evolved over time. Our literature search did not identify any cases or case series reporting serious clinical consequences of such interactions and no pharmacoepidemiological studies on the association between alpha-blockers and inhibitors of CYP3A4. The content of the summaries of product characteristics indicate that the combination of ketoconazole with alfuzosin, silodosin and tamsulosin increases the area under the curve of the alpha-blocker 3 fold., Conclusion: Data demonstrating the clinical consequences of an association between alpha-blocker and a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor are lacking. The 3 fold increase of the area under the curve for alfuzosin, silodosin and tamsulosin associated with ketoconazole while the association with the two first is contra-indicated and is not recommended with the third raises questions. This lack of data leaves doctors and pharmacists in a situation of uncertainty on how to proceed when such an interaction occurs., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The recommended daily dose of acetaminophen is limited to 60mg/kg/day with a maximum of 3g daily dose in adults weighing less than 50kg or in patients undergoing certain risk factors. This study aimed at assessing the fulfillment of those recommendations and the possible impact on the liver dysfunction at supra-therapeutic doses of acetaminophen., Methods: This study was performed one day in 9 services. Patients characteristics, acetaminophen dose, daily dose administered, physiopathological aspects, markers of liver damage were collected., Results: Among 542 prescriptions analyzed, 343 of them contained acetaminophen. The median age of patients studied was 81 years and one third weighed less than 50kg. The main risk factor of supra-therapeutic prescriptions was the lack of dose acetaminophen based on weight with 14% patients concerned and this risk raised at 17% when the pathophysiological conditions were included. The presence of pharmacists in medicals departments was more effective than the use of informatics programs limiting the dose systematically to 3g/day, or a distant pharmaceutical validation from care services to reduce the risk of acetaminophen overdose. According to the statement of administrations, only 4 of 49 patients received doses above 60mg/kg/day with a low impact on liver function tests., Conclusion: The continuous presence in pharmaceutical care services was the most effective measure to ensure effective implementation of acetaminophen recommendations., (Copyright © 2016 Académie Nationale de Pharmacie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Assessing the significance of pharmacist interventions (PIs) is essential to demonstrate the added value of pharmacists. Methods and tools for assessing the potential significance of PIs are diverse and their properties are questionable., Objectives: We aimed to systematically review the tools available to assess the potential significance of PIs., Methods: We conducted a systematic search for English- or French-language publications from 1986 to 2013 in PubMed, PsycINFO, PASCAL, and CINAHL. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers based on inclusion/exclusion criteria and were abstracted for content, structure of tools, and validation process., Results: Of 873 citations screened, 82 distinct tools were identified from 133 studies. While clinical aspects were often defined quite clearly, terminology regarding humanistic, economic, and process-related aspects of PIs was omitted, incomplete, or ambiguous in most tools. The probabilities of consequences of PIs/drug-related problems were evaluated in 20/82 tools. Few tools simultaneously measured economic, clinical, humanistic, and process-related variables. Structure of the tools varied from an implicit, mono-dimensional tool to an explicit, multi-dimensional algorithm. Validation processes were diverse in terms of quantification and number of raters, rating method, and psychometric parameters. Of 133 identified studies, there was limited evidence of validity (8/133, 6.0%), inter-rater reliability (49/133, 36.8%), and intra-rater reliability (2/133, 1.5%)., Conclusions: The majority of tools focused primarily on assessing clinical aspects and failed to detect comprehensive impacts. The heterogeneity of tools and assessment processes hindered our ability to synthesize the results of evaluations. Limited results for their validity and reliability cast doubt on the credibility of this methodology for justification of the value of PIs. Recommendations for development of tools with optimal theoretical, pragmatic, and psychometric properties are proposed.

Introduction: The French Society of Clinical Pharmacy (SFPC) through the special interest group "standardization and optimization of clinical pharmacy activities" stated that the study of pharmacists' interventions (PIs) conducted during prescription analysis was a priority. The SFPC developed an internet website named Act-IP(®) (http://www.sfpc.eu/fr/) where French speaking pharmacists were able to document PIs using a normalized codification. The objective of this study was to analyze medication-related problems linked to psychotropic drugs in hospital and to investigate PIs performed during prescription analysis., Materials and Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective, observational study using PIs involving psychotropic medications recorded between September 2006 and February 2009 on the Act-IP(®) website., Results: Four thousand six hundred and twenty PIs recorded by 165 pharmacists in 57 hospitals were related to psychotropic drugs. Patients concerned by these drug-related problems were 64 years old on average. Seven categories of medication-related problems represented more than 69% of PIs (1.1-Non Conformity of the drug choice compared to the formulary; 4.1 Supratherapeutic dose; 5.3 Therapeutic redundancy; 6.2 Drug interaction (all levels of severity); 7.0 Adverse drug reaction; 8.3 Inappropriate drug form; 8.5 Inappropriate timing of administration). The PIs related to 9.2 Patient's non compliance, 2.0 Untreated indication and 3.2 Length of the treatment too short were infrequent (less than 1%). The most common type of intervention was the dose adjustment. Almost 45% of these PIs involved Zopiclone or Zolpidem prescription in elderly patients. Seven hundred and nine drug interactions were identified by pharmacists. The most common type of drug interaction considered the risk of cardiac arrhythmias due to antipsychotic medications. One hundred and thirty-three PIs concerned adverse drug reaction. The most frequent adverse drug reactions were a fall (36 PIs), hemorrhage/bleeding (32 PIs), drowsiness (12 PIs) and extrapyramidal syndrome (12 PIs). Antidepressant drugs were the greatest pharmacological class concerning adverse drug reaction. The overall acceptance rate was 57%. Eight hundred and seventy-four PIs (19%) were refused and 1111 (24%) were non-assessable., Discussion: PIs avoids drug-related problems, such as the polyprescription of benzodiazepine or supratherapeutic dose. However, few PIs concern compliance to therapy or polyprescription of antipsychotic drugs. These two categories of medication-related problems are known to be an issue in mental health therapy. The lack of guidelines describing mental health pathology (such as the HAS guideline) is an obstacle for performing evidence-based PIs. The lack of information describing the context of the prescription is a limitation of this study. In order to improve their practice, pharmacists have to focus more on the context in which patients are evolving, and to take into account its entire situation based on Anglo-Saxon approaches. A second way is to identify clinical settings where PIs are useful and to describe PIs needed. Doctors and pharmacists should get together and talk about these clinical situations and PIs, because some may be misunderstood or disapproved by prescribers. This collaboration could take the form of a thesaurus combining clinical situation and PIs., Conclusion: It appears important for pharmacists to show their daily involvement in the quality of medical care. This feedback on medication problems encountered and PIs proposed should help prescribers to identify clinical situations at risk. Nevertheless, this study also suggests that progress is possible. Dialogue must allow pharmacists and physicians to delete misunderstandings about their practices., (Copyright © 2014 L’Encéphale, Paris. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The huge number of drug interactions makes it impossible to memorize them all. Detecting them and preventing adverse effects requires the use of reference works or databases. There are numerous discordances between the so-called "reference" books and databases. Nonexistent and unconfirmed interactions are published. The wording of the "drug interactions" section of the summary of product characteristics (SCP) sometimes sheds very little light on the risks involved. The delay by AFSSAPS in updating its drug interaction thesaurus may present problems in clinical practice. It is essential to know the limitations of the computerized systems for detecting and reporting drug interactions.

Objective: To compare and analyze the number and types of pharmacist interventions when prescriptions were handwritten (period 1) or entered on 2 different computerized physician order entry systems (CPOE): Phedra (period 2) and Actipidos (period 3)., Methods: This study took place over 54 weeks (18 weeks for each period) in a 46-bed internal medicine department. Pharmacist interventions were categorized as either simple substitution to an available drug or "complex" interventions such as changing dosage (D), changing drug (M), stopping or substituting in cases of contraindication or overdosing (CO), new medication (N) and identifying errors due to CPOE (C)., Results: The study analyzed 12420 prescriptions that led to 1420 interventions. There were 720 substitutions and 98 interventions in period 1, 40 and 238 in period 2, and 97 and 227 in period 3. The percentage of interventions by types for each of the three periods, respectively were D: 52, 37 and 34%; M: 21, 22 and 35%; CO: 16, 12 and 16%; N: 11, 5 and 2%; and C: 0, 24 and 13%. The errors due to CPOE were mainly wrong dosage units and duplicate orders., Discussion: Introduction of CPOE drastically reduced the number of simple substitutions and significantly increased the complex interventions. CPOE introduced new risks of serious errors., Conclusion: In our study, CPOE did not prevent medication errors and led to new types of errors. The presence and intervention of clinical pharmacists remained necessary.

Objective: To validate an instrument for documentation of clinical pharmacy interventions in French speaking hospitals in France and outside of France., Method: A panel of 12 French speaking clinical pharmacists (six from France; six from French speaking countries) was asked to analyse a set of 60 pharmacist's interventions on drug prescription. They used a form including (1) the identification of the drug related problems (DRPs) (10 items), (2) the pharmacist's intervention (7 items). We assessed the level of agreement between the 12 pharmacists on the test DRPs and on the interventions., Main Outcome Measures: Kappa coefficient of concordance was used to assess the level of agreement between experts for DRPs and interventions. We also assessed the userfriendliness of the instrument using Likert scales., Results: The level of concordance observed in the validation was 0.76 for DRPs and 0.89 for the type of intervention. Eleven experts out of 12 were "very satisfied" or "satisfied" and one "not satisfied" with the tool. Ten out of the 12 experts were ready to use it in daily practise., Conclusion: The present instrument proposed by the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy (SFPC) is the first coding system for pharmacist's interventions with a French interface. The validation process using a standard statistical methodology helps support the external validity of our tool. The level of concordance between users can be considered as satisfactory, allowing the use of the tool in daily clinical pharmacy practise. To enhance the diffusion of the instrument and of the general process of routine documentation of interventions, a spreadsheet is provided on the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy website.

Study Objectives: To assess the knowledge of prescribers regarding intravenous to oral conversions of fluoroquinolones, the frequency and time until conversion, and to compare prescriber knowledge with the data collected concerning the reasons stated for continuation of intravenous fluoroquinolones., Design: Prospective chart review and questionnaire., Setting: Large teaching hospital in Paris, France., Patients: Fifty-one males and females., Intervention: Data were collected on in-patients receiving intravenous fluoroquinolone for at least three days and hospitalized in one of six in-patient units. Patients receiving intravenous fluoroquinolone for less than three days were excluded. A questionnaire to assess the awareness of a potential conversion was distributed to those practitioners who had patients reviewed during the data-collection phase., Main Results: The questionnaire revealed the ten most common reasons for continuing intravenous administration for more than three days. However, the physicians agreed that most patients should be converted as soon as possible. Practice patterns differed, with only 17 of 51 patients actually converted to oral therapy., Conclusion: In theory, the clinicians were aware of when to perform the conversion. However, in practice, the frequency of conversion was lower than optimum. Changes in clinical practice are needed to decrease the costs of intravenous therapy, without jeopardizing quality of care.

Problem: Need to improve the efficiency of postoperative pain management by early switching from intravenous to oral acetaminophen., Design: Implementation of local guidelines aimed at improving nurses' and doctors' behaviour. A controlled, prospective, before and after study evaluated its impact on appropriateness and costs., Background and Setting: Orthopaedic surgery department (intervention) and all other surgical departments (control) of a university hospital. Five anaesthetists and 30 nurses of orthopaedic department participated in study., Key Measures for Improvement: Reducing number of acetaminophen injections per patient, reducing consumption of acetaminophen injections; cost savings over a one year period., Strategies for Improvement: Multifaceted intervention included a local consensus process, short educational presentation, poster displayed in all nurses' offices, and feedback of practices six months after implementation of guidelines., Effects of Change: Mean number of acetaminophen injections per patient decreased from 6.81 before intervention to 2.36 six months after. Monthly consumption of acetaminophen injections per 100 patients decreased by 320.9 (95% confidence interval 192.4 to 449.4) in intervention department and remained unchanged in control departments. Annual cost reduction was projected to be pound 15,100., Lessons Learnt: Simple and locally implemented guidelines can improve practices and cut costs. Educational interventions can improve professionals' behaviour when they are based on actual working practices, use interactive techniques such as discussion groups, and are associated with other effective implementation strategies.

The aim of this work was to assess the impact of circulating guidelines for correct prescription practices of colony stimulating factors (CSF). Two hospital groups were compared, a 'guidelines' group (seven teaching hospitals) that circulated the guidelines and a control group (eight teaching hospitals) that did not. In addition, two periods were compared before and after distribution of the guidelines: from 17 February to 2 March 1996 and from 17 February to 2 March 1997. The assessment involved compliance with the guidelines for the following parameters: indications, dose regimen, time to start of CSF therapy and duration of CSF therapy between the control and guideline groups and also between the two periods. The population included 404 patients analyzed (209 in 1996 and 195 in 1997) for the indication of post-chemotherapy neutropenia. Total compliance in the first period (all four items) was 44.2% in the control group and 50.8% in the guideline group (nonsignificant), and during the second period was 31.9 and 59.6% in the two groups (p<0.001). During the first period, the differences in compliance with the guidelines for indication, dose regimen, time to start of treatment and duration between the groups were not significant. In the second period, this difference became significant and in favor of the guideline group for dose regimen (p = 0.009) and treatment duration (p = 0.02). The results of this study show the need to continuously define prescription reference systems according to available data, and to circulate them widely to improve the quality of health care and to control expenses.

Objective: The efficiency of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) has not been established in non surgical patients, so their official preventive use has been limited in France since 1995 to surgery. However, a survey conducted in 5 university hospitals in non surgical patients showed that 21-29% of patients still received a LMWH prescription. It seemed necessary to define the medical conditions for which the practical use of these heparins would be justified. We contacted external experts to obtain a consensus by using the Delphi method., Methods: The Delphi method, created by the "Rand Corporation" in the USA and used in medicine since the nineteen seventies, is based on a light logistic, with questionnaires been sent by mail with a feed-back report A total of 48 experts were chosen by local staff teams in the 5 hospitals. For the 3 rounds, from March to October 1998, questions were devised by a multicentred staff team., Results: Among the 48 experts contacted, 32 completed the 3 questionnaires, 7 of them did for 2, and 43 did for at least one questionnaire. The experts first defined a list of 12 risk or high risk situations and 11 aggravating factors. For any high risk situation, prescription is justified. For other cases, 2 risk situations are required, or one risk situation with at least 2 aggravating factors, to justify a prescription. If no risk situation is present, prescription is, according to experts, usually not justified., Conclusion: The maximal agreement defines the situations in which one use of low molecular weight heparins is proposed to prevent deep venous thrombosis in non surgical inpatients, in most current hospital situations and for more than 24 hours of hospitalization. Clinical trials are needed, to validate their effectiveness and define the optimal dose in these indications. To date, epidemiological studies should be conducted to evaluate the experts proposals by estimating risk factors for deep venous thrombosis.

Purpose: We propose a noninvasive method for the measurement of orocecal transit time assessed by the sulfapyridine appearance time in saliva after ingestion of sulfasalazine., Method: In 12 healthy volunteers, we studied the correlation between plasma and saliva sulfapyridine appearance times and then the sulfapyridine appearance times in saliva under various experimental conditions to assess the reproducibility, the effects of meals, and the role of the formulation, and the effects of gastrointestinal kinetic drugs., Results: The correlation between saliva and plasma sulfapyridine appearance times was strong (r = 0.84; p = 0.0004). The sulfapyridine saliva appearance time was significantly delayed by the meal. Compared with placebo, the saliva sulfapyridine appearance time was reduced by cisapride (312 +/- 128 versus 551 +/- 97 minutes; p = 0.0001) and increased by loperamide (674 +/- 267 versus 501 +/- 131 minutes; p = 0.044)., Conclusion: We propose the salivary sample method as a validated simplification of the plasma sulfasalazine-sulfapyridine test for the measurement of orocecal transit time.