Search

Objective: To report 77 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who developed skin-related adverse events (AEs) following treatment with cladribine., Methods: We evaluated our prospective bicentric cladribine cohort. Cladribine-treated patients with a skin AE were identified., Results: Two hundred thirty-nine cladribine-treated patients with MS were evaluated. Seventy-seven patients (32%) showed at least 1 skin AE at median 1 month after cladribine initiation (range: 1-12). Within first 3 months following last cladribine exposition, hair thinning (n = 28, 12%), skin rash (n = 20; 8%), mucositis (n = 13, 5%), and pruritus (n = 6, 3%) were observed. Furthermore, 35 patients (15%) developed herpes virus infections (time since last cladribine exposition: median 83 [range: 10-305]). In 15 patients, herpes zoster infection was severe (CTCAE grade ≥ 3) and required hospitalization. Delayed skin AEs (≥3 months after a cladribine treatment cycle) involved 1 case of leukocytoclastic vasculitis and 2 cases of alopecia areata. Finally, 2 patients presented with in total 3 isolated precancerous lesions (1 leukoplakia simplex and 2 actinic keratosis) and 1 patient developed a squamous cell carcinoma., Conclusion: Skin AEs are common in patients with MS treated with cladribine. Until risk management plans have been adjusted to include these phenomena, clinicians should perform a thorough clinical follow-up and in suspicious cases seek early interdisciplinary support. In light of the observed delayed skin reactions, we further emphasize the necessity of careful clinical surveillance of cladribine-treated patients for yet undescribed secondary autoimmune events., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that skin-related AEs are frequent in patients with MS following cladribine in a real-world setting., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

The nucleoside analogue, 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2CDA), was reported to be an active treatment for childhood Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) without risk organ (RO-) involvement. However, we lack data on long-term effects of 2CDA treatment, including the disease reactivation rate, permanent sequelae and long-term tolerance. This study included 44 children from the French LCH registry, treated for a RO- LCH with 2CDA monotherapy (median number of six courses). The median age at the beginning of 2CDA was 3·6 years (range, 0·3-19·7 years) and the median follow-up after was 5·4 years (range, 0·6-15·1 years). Objective response to 2CDA was observed in 25 patients (56·8%), while six patients (13·6%) had stable disease and 13 patients (29·5%) exhibited progressive disease. Among patients without progression, only two experienced disease reactivation after 2CDA discontinuation. The five-year cumulative incidence of disease progression or reactivation after 2CDA therapy initiation was 34·3%. The lymphopenia reported in all cases [72% below absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) of 0·5 G/l], was addressed with appropriate prophylactic measures. Other toxicities above grade 2 were uncommon, and no second malignant neoplasm or neuropathy was reported. The five-year overall survival was 97·7%. In conclusion, we could confirm that 2CDA monotherapy was a beneficial long-term therapy for treating patients with RO- LCH. Appropriate management of induced immune deficiency is mandatory., (© 2020 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Oral cladribine is a highly effective pulsed selective immune reconstitution therapy licensed for relapsing multiple sclerosis. A full treatment course comprises two treatment cycles given with 1 year of intermission. Further dosing is not routinely recommended in years 3 and 4., Areas Covered: The long-term management of patients treated with oral cladribine has not been fully defined on the basis of clinical studies as of yet. The authors provide their expert opinion on this., Expert Opinion: Based on available evidence and experience from routine clinical use, the authors suggest a structured approach to the long-term management of patients treated with cladribine tablets according to their responder type, i. e. the degree and timing of disease activity, if any, after treatment initiation. Informed treatment decisions require structured patient monitoring by established clinical and imaging parameters. In patients with relevant disease activity in year 3 or 4 and beyond, the use of additional cycle(s) of oral cladribine might become an option. For patients requiring a treatment switch, the choice of therapies primarily includes moderately to highly effective MS drugs.

Background: Long-term safety data are of particular interest for any newly approved treatment in multiple sclerosis such as cladribine tablets 10 mg (MAVENCLAD®; 3.5 mg/kg cumulative dose over 2 years, referred to as cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg), which is approved in Europe and the USA. Here we provide the final report on the integrated analysis of the safety profile of cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg from the clinical development program, including final data from the PREMIERE registry., Methods: Safety data for cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg from three previously reported Phase III studies (CLARITY, CLARITY Extension and ORACLE-MS), as well as the prospective, observational PREMIERE registry (which ran from November 2009 to October 2018; consisting of patients who had participated in at least one of the Phase III trials) were combined to provide the Monotherapy Oral cohort. Serious adverse events (SAEs) and predefined SAEs of special interest were recorded. Observation-adjusted incidence rates per 100 patient-years (Adj-AE per 100 PY) were used to assess adverse events (AEs). Standardized incidence ratios for malignancies were calculated in relation to a matched GLOBOCAN reference population, and risk differences (cladribine tablets versus placebo) were estimated., Results: The Monotherapy Oral cohort comprised 923 patients who received cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg and 641 patients who received placebo. Overall, the reported number of SAEs was higher in the cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg group (133/923 [14.4%] patients with at least 1 SAE), versus the placebo group (68/641 [10.6%] patients with at least 1 SAE). Four patients in the cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg group had lymphopenia classified as a serious event (resulting in an Adj-AE of 0.10 per 100 PY) and 2 patients had serious herpes zoster (resulting in an Adj-AE of 0.05 per 100 PY). There were no cases in the corresponding placebo groups. There was no difference between the cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg group and placebo in the overall incidence of infections. However herpetic infection AEs occurred more frequently in the cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg group (driven primarily by herpes zoster, followed by oral herpes and herpes simplex). Overall, there was a numerical imbalance in malignancy incidence between cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg and placebo, with an Adj-AE of 0.26 and 0.12 per 100 PY, respectively; however the difference was not statistically significant. The rate of malignancies observed with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg in the final integrated safety analysis was not different from the expected rate in the matched GLOBOCAN reference population (standardized incidence ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.44-1.69)., Conclusion: Additional patient-years of observation do not significantly alter the conclusions of earlier interim analyses, and no new major safety findings were identified in this consolidated analysis of safety data of cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg monotherapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Most cases of COVID-19 are considered mild, but patients with immunosuppressant treatment might be prone to severe courses of disease. Expert panels advise to delay treatment with cell-depleting MS therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic., Methods: We report a case of a patient with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who developed COVID-19 pneumonia 2 weeks after the first week of cladribine therapy., Results: Despite a severe lymphopenia (absolute lymphocyte count 240/µL), the patient had a moderate course of COVID-19., Conclusion: Apart from maximal supportive treatment, this could be due to cladribine reducing inflammatory response, which probably contributes considerably to severe courses of COVID-19 pneumonia.

Introduction: Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a B-cell lymphoid malignancy that accounts for approximately 2% of all leukemias. Treatment with purine nucleoside analogs (PNA) results in a high response rate and remains the standard of care. Long term follow-up shows that most patients relapse and require retreatment. Newer combination strategies and agents have emerged to try to reduce the relapse rate and to address cases of PNA refractoriness., Areas Covered: The authors reviewed the literature on the pharmacological management of HCL, including recent studies that led to new agents being incorporated into practice., Expert Opinion: Combination of cladribine plus rituximab produces a high rate of measurable residual disease-negative complete remission. In our center, newly diagnosed patients are offered cladribine followed by 8 weekly doses of rituximab in an ongoing phase II trial. Patients in first relapse are also offered this combination if they were initially treated with a single-agent PNA, or if the remission duration was ≥5 years after first-line cladribine plus rituximab. Patients who relapse within 5 years are offered therapy with a novel agent that may include the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib, alone or in combination with rituximab, dabrafenib in combination with trametinib, the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib, or moxetumomab pasudotox.

Objective: To report three cases of severe skin reactions in patients treated with cladribine for multiple sclerosis., Methods: Case study., Results: Patients developed severe rash 3-192 days after receiving cladribine. All were effectively treated with steroids and antihistamines. Additional doses of cladribine were administered after pretreatment with steroids and anti-histamines. One patient developed mild recurrence following re-exposure, which resolved within three days, whilst another patient tolerated re-exposure without further adverse reaction., Conclusion: Severe skin reactions, well described in patients receiving cladribine for treatment of haematological conditions, may occur in patients treated with this compound for multiple sclerosis. Neurologists need to be aware of this rare, but significant adverse reaction. Re-exposure may be safe with standard pre-treatment against allergic reactions., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None considered relevant. MMC, SR, EO, DTS, YO and APK have nothing to declare. JM has received advisory boards fees from Novartis and Merck. DB has received compensation for consultancies presentations and/or advisory board activities from Merck. DB is shareholder of Canbex Therapeutics and has received compensation for activities related to Canbex therapeutics, Japan tobacco, Roche and Sanofi-Genzyme; GG has received honoraria and meeting support from AbbVie Biotherapeutics, Biogen, Canbex, Ironwood, Novartis, Merck, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Synthon, Teva and Vertex; KS has received honoraria and/or meeting support from Biogen, Lipomed, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Although use of contraception was pre-specified during cladribine clinical trials for multiple sclerosis, some pregnancies did occur., Objective: This analysis reports on pregnancy outcomes in the cladribine clinical development program., Methods: Pregnancy outcomes in female patients (direct pregnancies) and those arising from partner pregnancies (i.e., female partners of male study participants with multiple sclerosis) were evaluated from an integrated safety analysis of ten studies of cladribine in multiple sclerosis (nine clinical trials and a long-term safety registry), with patients treated with cladribine tablets, parenteral cladribine, or placebo (all-exposed cohort; 1976 patients received cladribine and 802 received placebo). Pregnancies that occurred during the 'at-risk' period for cladribine (during treatment or within 6 months thereafter) are reported as a separate group., Results: In the all-exposed cohort, 70 direct pregnancies occurred among 62 female patients (cladribine, n = 49; placebo, n = 21). Pregnancy outcomes were: live births (cladribine, n = 19 [38.8%]; placebo, n = 9 [42.9%]), elective terminations (cladribine, n = 14 [28.6%]; placebo, n = 4 [19.0%]), spontaneous abortions (cladribine, n = 11 [22.4%]; placebo, n = 5 [23.8%]), and therapeutic terminations (cladribine, n = 5 [10.2%]; placebo, n = 2 [9.5%]); in the remaining placebo recipient, the pregnancy outcome was unknown. There were two reports of congenital malformations (cladribine, n = 1; placebo, n = 1), both of which occurred with pregnancies arising > 2 years after exposure to the last dose of study medication. Sixteen direct pregnancies occurred during the 'at-risk' period for cladribine; outcomes for these were: live births, n = 3 (18.8%); elective terminations, n = 10 (62.5%); spontaneous abortions, n = 2 (12.5%); and therapeutic terminations, n = 1 (6.2%). Corresponding findings for direct pregnancies among placebo recipients were (n = 11): live births, n = 5 (45.5%); elective terminations, n = 2 (18.2%); spontaneous abortions, n = 3 (27.3%); and unknown, n = 1 (9.1%). No cases of congenital malformation were reported for pregnancies during the 'at-risk' period. There were an additional nine partner pregnancies in female partners of cladribine-treated male patients, all of which resulted in live births; of these, two pregnancies occurred within the 'at-risk' period for cladribine., Conclusions: While limited by the small number of pregnancies and related data from the cladribine clinical development program, highlighting the need for further study, the observations made in the present analysis were generally consistent with epidemiological data on pregnancy outcomes for the general population or women with multiple sclerosis. There were no congenital malformations in pregnancies that occurred during cladribine treatment or within 6 months after the last dose. As the data available for cladribine-exposed pregnancies in patients with multiple sclerosis are limited, a non-interventional post-authorization safety study has been initiated to obtain more information on this subject., Clinical Trial Registration: CLARITY: NCT00213135; CLARITY Extension: NCT00641537; ORACLE MS: NCT00725985; ONWARD: NCT00436826; PREMIERE: NCT01013350.

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare protean disease that usually affects children. Few data are available for management of adult-onset cases. A complete picture of the efficacy and safety of 2CdA (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine, cladribine) is lacking. We report a retrospective multicentre study of 23 adult LCH (a-LCH) patients who received single-agent 2CdA and a systematic literature review. All had previously received systemic therapy (vinblastine, n = 19). Response to 2CdA was evaluable in 22 cases. Overall response rate (ORR) was 91%. Complete response (CR) occurred in 11 cases (50%). Nine patients (39%) developed grade 3-4 neutropenia and/or severe infection. A literature review yielded 48 additional cases. A pooled analysis confirmed our findings (ORR: 88%, CR: 49%). CRs were rare with cumulative dose <50 mg/m 2 . Disease progression rates were 20% and 30% at two and five years, respectively. Partial response (PR) to 2CdA was predictive of disease progression. Among eight re-treated patients, five went into CR, two in PR, and one died. Single-agent 2CdA is effective in reactivated a-LCH, including at intermediate doses. Toxicity, significant but acceptable, warrants infectious prophylaxis. Complete responders may enter prolonged remission. Further studies are needed to determine 2CdA sequencing with other agents (vinblastine, cytarabine)., (© 2020 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims: To assess the cost-utility of cladribine tablets versus fingolimod in patients with highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Portugal. Methods: A 1-year cycle cohort-based Markov state transition model was developed to simulate disease progression, measured by Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), relapses, and conversion to secondary-progressive MS (SPMS). Patients were assumed to remain on treatment until progression to EDSS level 7, conversion to SPMS, or complete loss of efficacy due to waning effect. Natural history was based on British Columbia Multiple Sclerosis registry, London Ontario database, UK MS Trust, and cladribine tablets clinical trial (CLARITY). Portuguese all-cause mortality was adjusted for the MS associated increased mortality. Clinical inputs for active treatments (disability progression and relapse rate) were estimated on a network meta-analysis. Utility weights were derived from UK-MS Survey and published literature. Resource consumption by EDSS and due to relapses was based on published literature, National DRG microdata and expert opinion. Unit costs were obtained from official sources. The analysis was conducted from payers' perspective, time horizon of 50 years and discount rate of 5%, for both costs and benefits. Uncertainty was assessed via probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses. Results: Compared to fingolimod, cladribine tablets were associated with a delay in progression, resulting in a gain of 0.85 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and a cost decrease of 25,935 €. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis resulted in a mean ICER of -31,781 € per QALY and was dominant in 98.7% of the simulations. Cladribine tablets were dominant across the scenario analyses tested. Conclusions: Treatment of highly active RRMS with cladribine tablets was less costly and more effective than treatment with fingolimod. Hence, it is a dominant strategy in the Portuguese setting. No conclusions can be drawn from the present study regarding other treatment options, in particular natalizumab and alemtuzumab.

Background and Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of cladribine treatments in a population of patients with refractory myasthenia gravis (MG)., Methods: In a prospective open-label study of cladribine in refractory MG, 13 patients received cladribine at baseline with repetitive cycles driven by clinical response. A Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) score was obtained and a standard dose of steroids was administered., Results: A total of 11 patients achieved significant clinical improvement in MGC score during their therapy. The mean MGC score declined from 15.1 to 6.3 points within 4 months of observation. The dosage of prednisolone declined from 9.5 to 1.9 mg. None of the patients required intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange treatments and no adverse events occurred in the study period., Conclusion: Cladribine seems to be a safe and effective emergency therapy in a population of patients with refractory MG., (© 2019 European Academy of Neurology.)

Introduction: Cladribine is a prodrug, a synthetic analogue of deoxyadenosine, approved for use as selective immune reconstitution therapy in very active recurring multiple sclerosis in adults., Aims: To review the development of the drug, its mechanism of action and the efficacy and safety data obtained to date, as well as to establish recommendations of Spanish experts for its use in clinical practice., Development: The treatment of multiple sclerosis has been simplified with cladribine tablets, and two short courses of administration for two consecutive years (maximum 20 days) are needed to maintain an efficacy of up to four years after the first dose. Results of clinical trials have demonstrated the safety, tolerability and long-term efficacy of cladribine tablets in patients with recurring multiple sclerosis. Thus, patients treated with cladribine presented a significant reduction in the rate of flare-ups, in the risk of disability progression and in the development of new lesions in magnetic resonance imaging compared to those treated with placebo. In terms of safety, the treated patients had a higher frequency of lymphopenia, in relation to its mechanism of action, and of infections by herpes zoster virus. Long-term results with eight years' follow-up have shown that treated patients are not at greater risk of developing serious events, such as malignant neoplasms or opportunistic infections., Conclusions: Cladribine is the first short-course oral therapy that has been shown to be effective and safe in patients with very active recurring multiple sclerosis, and with a sustained effect over time. The recommendations of Spanish experts on its usage are a fundamental complement to the considerations described by the regulatory agencies.

In this report, we present a young infant with multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis, who after cladribine and cytarabine salvage treatment developed immune thrombocytopenia (IT). On review of the literature, there were no previous reports of Langerhans cell histiocytosis-associated IT. Treatment of the IT with intravenous immunoglobulin and oral corticosteroids was unsuccessful. Eltrombopag, in combination with a 4-day course of dexamethasone was commenced as second-line therapy. Platelet recovery occurred 10 days after initiation of eltrombopag. The immune thrombocytopenia remains in long-term remission despite cessation of eltrombopag. Eltrombopag was safe and well tolerated.

Altered DNA methylation and histone acetylation in lymphoma provided the rationale for using vorinostat (SAHA), cladribine and rituximab (SCR) in non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) in this phase 1-2 study (NCT00764517). Treatment included cladribine 5 mg/m 2 intravenously (IV) (days 1-5), rituximab 375 mg/m 2 IV (weekly 4× for cycle 1 and 1×/month) and vorinostat orally once daily (days 1-14) every 28 days for up to six cycles. Phase 1 included relapsed patients (n = 10) in a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design (vorinostat: 200, 300 and 400 mg). No dose-limiting toxicities were seen. The phase 2 dose for vorinostat was 400 mg po (days 1-14). The majority of phase 2 patients had mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) (n = 57; 39 previously untreated, 10 relapsed). The primary objective was objective response rate [complete response (CR) + partial response] which was 39% (7/18) in relapsed patients and 97% (38/39) with 80% (31/39) attaining a CR in previously untreated MCL. At a median follow-up of 42 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for relapsed NHL were 19·5 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2·0-33·0] and 25·0 (95% CI: 12·0-45·0) months respectively. Median PFS for previously untreated MCL was 84·0 months; OS could not be estimated. Toxicities were primarily haematological., (© 2019 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims: Cladribine tablets have shown significant efficacy for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis, a chronic and debilitating immune-mediated disorder. This study was conducted to examine acute and/or cumulative effects of cladribine tablets 10 mg (3.5 or 5.25 mg/kg cumulative dose over 2 years) on heart rate, AV conduction and cardiac repolarization in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS)., Methods: CLARITY was a 96-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial which evaluated the safety and efficacy of cladribine tablets 3.5 and 5.25 mg/kg body weight in patients with RRMS. A total of 135 patients were included in the ECG substudy, providing a total of 1534 post-dose ECGs. ECG data were collected 15 minutes pre-dose and between 0.5 and 3 hours post-dose at pre-study evaluation, study Day 1 and Weeks 5, 9, 13, 48 and 52., Results: For cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg, the maximum change in placebo-adjusted post-dose QTcF vs. visit-baseline (BL) was -0.42 ms (90% CI: -3.61-4.44) at Week 1 (acute effects), and 3.20 ms (90% CI: -0.08-6.33) for cladribine tablets 5.25 mg/kg. The greatest observed differences in post-dose QTcF vs. study BL occurred at Week 48 for both the 3.5 and 5.25 mg/kg doses of cladribine tablets with 5.99 ms (90% CI: 0.53-11.44) and 8.74 ms (90% CI: 3.18-14.31), respectively. No significant changes were observed in T-wave morphology in either treatment group., Conclusions: Cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg (approved dose in Europe/other regions) did not confer clinically meaningful effects on heart rate, AV conduction and ventricular repolarization., (© 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Objectives: Statistical methods to adjust for treatment switching are commonly applied to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in oncology. Nevertheless, RCTs with extension studies incorporating nonrandomized dropout require consideration of alternative adjustment methods. The current study used a recognized method and a novel method to adjust for treatment switching in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS)., Methods: The Cladribine Tablets Treating Multiple Sclerosis Orally (CLARITY) RCT evaluated the efficacy of cladribine versus placebo over 96 weeks. Many (but not all) CLARITY participants enrolled in the 96-week CLARITY extension study; placebo-treated patients from CLARITY received cladribine (PP→LL), and cladribine-treated patients were re-randomized to placebo (LL→PP) or continued cladribine (LL→LL). End points were time to first qualifying relapse (FQR) and time to 3-month and 6-month confirmed disability progression (3mCDP, 6mCDP). We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of the LL→PP treatment strategy compared with a counterfactual (unobserved) PP→PP strategy. We applied the commonly used rank-preserving structural failure time model (RPSFTM) and a novel approach that combined propensity score matching (PSM) with inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW)., Results: The RPSFTM resulted in LL→PP versus PP→PP hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.48 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.62) for FQR, 0.62 (95% CI 0.46-0.84) for 3mCDP, and 0.62 (95% CI 0.44-0.88) for 6mCDP. The PSM+IPCW resulted in HRs of 0.47 (95% CI 0.38-0.63) for FQR, 0.61 (95% CI 0.43-0.86) for 3mCDP, and 0.63 (95% CI 0.40-0.87) for 6mCDP., Conclusions: The PSM+IPCW HRs were consistent with those from the RPSFTM, suggesting that the results were not substantially biased by informative dropout, assuming that all relevant confounders were controlled for. There was no statistical evidence of a reduction in the cladribine treatment effect during the extension period., (Copyright © 2019 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Major advances in the treatment of patients with hairy cell leukemia (HCL) have been made following the introduction of purine analogues. The major significant short-term toxicity of cladribine therapy are neutropenia and neutropenic fever (NF) which may be life-threatening., Aim: In this retrospective study, we compared the incidence and duration of neutropenia and hospitalization in patients with HCL treated with cladribine followed by peg-filgrastim as primary prophylaxis versus daily filgrastim given "on demand" according to absolute neutrophil count (ANC)., Methods: Medical records of patients with HCL diagnosed and followed in 12 medical centers in Israel during 1985-2015 were examined for details of disease at diagnosis. The efficacy of peg-filgrastim and filgrastim was assessed by evaluating the incidence of neutropenia (ANC < 1.0 × 10 [9]/L), number and length of hospitalizations, and number of days from the last day of therapy to recovery of ANC to >1.0 × 10 [9]/L., Results: The study population included 202 patients with HCL, 159 of whom (80.7%) were treated with cladribine; 78 patients (49%) required hospitalization for the administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics due to NF. Twenty-eight (19%) patients were treated with peg-filgrastim as primary prophylaxis, while 74 (64%) received filgrastim "on demand" due to neutropenia. Median length of hospitalization, and nadir duration were 8 and 18 days respectively (p = 0.71, p = 0.44)., Conclusions: Infectious complications post-cladribine treatment remain high. No difference was found in terms of incidence of NF, number of febrile days, and nadir duration in patients receiving primary peg-filgrastim prophylaxis compared to filgrastim given on demand. Both approaches are justifiable, and the choice remains at the physician's discretion., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate the overall efficacy and toxicity of cladribine and cladribine-based chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) based on meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE database, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. Eligible studies were clinical trials of refractory AML assigned to cladribine with data on efficacy including complete remission (CR) rate, overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival. Toxicity was evaluated based on the early death rate and the incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs). Results: A total of 10 clinical trials including 422 refractory AML patients were analyzed. The overall CR rate was 42.2% (95% CI: 31.0-54.3%). And the ORR of seven trials including 235 patients was 49.7% (95% CI: 33.5-66.0%). The overall early death rate of 260 patients enrolled in five trials was 6.8% (95% CI: 4.3-10.6%). Thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, and infection were the most common grade 3 and 4 AEs. Conclusion: Cladribine is effective for refractory AML, and its efficacy can be increased with the combination of cladribine, cytarabine, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor regimen., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Background: In the CLARITY (CLAdRIbine Tablets treating multiple sclerosis orallY) study, Cladribine Tablets significantly improved clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes (vs placebo) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis., Objective: Describe two clinically relevant definitions for patients with high disease activity (HDA) at baseline of the CLARITY study (utility verified in patients receiving placebo) and assess the treatment effects of Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg compared with the overall study population., Methods: Outcomes of patients randomised to Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg or placebo were analysed for subgroups using HDA definitions based on high relapse activity (HRA; patients with ⩾2 relapses during the year prior to study entry, whether on DMD treatment or not) or HRA plus disease activity on treatment (HRA + DAT; patients with ⩾2 relapses during the year prior to study entry, whether on DMD treatment or not, PLUS patients with ⩾1 relapse during the year prior to study entry while on therapy with other DMDs and ⩾1 T1 Gd+ or ⩾9 T2 lesions)., Results: In the overall population, Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg reduced the risk of 6-month-confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) worsening by 47% vs placebo. A risk reduction of 82% vs placebo was seen in both the HRA and HRA + DAT subgroups (vs 19% for non-HRA and 18% for non-HRA + DAT), indicating greater responsiveness to Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg in patients with HDA. There were consistent results for other efficacy endpoints. The safety profile in HDA patients was consistent with the overall CLARITY population., Conclusion: Patients with HDA showed clinical and MRI responses to Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg that were generally better than, or at least comparable with, the outcomes seen in the overall CLARITY population.

Background: Immune reconstitution therapies (IRT) for patients with multiple sclerosis are used for short, intermittent treatment periods to induce immune resetting and allow subsequent treatment-free periods. Cladribine tablets are postulated to be an IRT that causes selective and transient reductions in CD19 + B cells and T cells, followed by reconstitution of adaptive immune function., Objective: To characterize long-term lymphocyte count changes in pooled data from the 2-year CLARITY and subsequent 2-year CLARITY Extension studies, and the PREMIERE registry (Long-term CLARITY cohort)., Methods: Data from patients randomized to placebo (n = 435) or cladribine tablets 10 mg (MAVENCLAD ® ; 3.5 mg/kg cumulative dose over 2 years, referred to as cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg; n = 685) in CLARITY or CLARITY Extension, including time spent in the PREMIERE registry were pooled to provide long-term follow-up data. The study investigated absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) up to 312 weeks and B and T cell subsets up to 240 weeks after the first dose, in patients receiving placebo or cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg administered as two short (4 or 5 days) weekly treatments at the start of months 1 and 2 in each treatment year, followed by no further active treatment., Results: Treatment with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg resulted in selective reductions in B and T lymphocytes. Lymphocyte recovery began soon after treatment in each of years 1 and 2. Median ALC recovered to the normal range and CD19 + B cells recovered to threshold values by week 84, approximately 30 weeks after the last dose of cladribine tablets in year 2. Median CD4 + T cell counts recovered to threshold values by week 96 (approximately 43 weeks after the last dose of cladribine tablets in year 2). Median CD8 + cell counts never dropped below the threshold value., Conclusion: These results show the dynamics of lymphocyte count changes following treatment with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg. The immune cell repopulation results provide further evidence that cladribine tablets may represent a form of IRT., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Treating patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) with cladribine tablets (two times 4 or 5 days of treatment each year for 2 years) results in long-lasting efficacy, with continued stability in many patients for 4 or more years. Safety and tolerability outcomes from individual clinical studies with cladribine tablets have been reported previously., Objective: Report safety data from an integrated analysis of clinical trials and follow-up in patients with MS to further characterize the safety profile of cladribine tablets., Methods: Data for patients treated with cladribine tablets 10 mg (MAVENCLAD ® ; 3.5 mg/kg cumulative dose over 2 years, referred to as cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg) as monotherapy (n = 923) or placebo (n = 641) in Phase III clinical trials (CLARITY, CLARITY Extension and ORACLE-MS) and followed up in the PREMIERE registry were aggregated (Monotherapy Oral cohort). To better characterize rare events, additional data from earlier studies which involved the use of parenteral cladribine in patients with MS, and the ONWARD study, in which patients were given cladribine tablets in addition to interferon (IFN)-β or placebo plus IFN-β were included in an All Exposed cohort (cladribine, n = 1926; placebo, n = 802). Adjusted adverse events incidences per 100 patient-years (Adj-AE per 100 PY) were calculated for the integrated analyses., Results: The incidence rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the Monotherapy Oral cohort was 103.29 vs. 94.26 Adj-AEs per 100 PY for placebo. TEAEs that occurred more frequently with cladribine tablets were mainly driven by the TEAEs of lymphopenia (Adj-AE per 100 PY 7.94 vs. 1.06 for placebo) and lymphocyte count decreased (Adj-AE per 100 PY 0.78 vs. 0.10 for placebo) as anticipated due to the mode of action of cladribine. An increase in TEAE incidence rate was also observed in the cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg group vs. placebo for herpes zoster (Adj-AE per 100 PY 0.83 vs. 0.20, respectively). There were no cases of systemic, serious disseminated herpes zoster attributed to treatment with cladribine tablets. In general there was no increase in the risk of infections including opportunistic infections with cladribine tablets versus placebo, except for herpes zoster. Periods of severe lymphopenia (< 0.5 × 10 9 cells/L) were associated with an increased frequency of infections, but the nature of these was not different to that observed in the overall patient group treated with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg. Within the constraints of a limited sample size, malignancy rates in the overall clinical program for cladribine in MS did not show evidence of an increase compared to placebo-treated patients and there was no increase in the incidence of malignancies over time in cladribine-treated patients., Conclusion: The AE profile for cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg as a monotherapy has been well-characterized in a pooled population of patients from early to more advanced relapsing MS. There was no increased risk for infections in general except for a higher incidence of herpes zoster. Lymphopenia was amongst the most frequently observed TEAEs that occurred at a higher incidence with cladribine relative to placebo. There was also no increase in malignancy rates for cladribine relative to placebo., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

The combination of cytarabine and an anthracycline has been the standard of care for the induction of remission in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The response to treatment and survival of adult patients with AML are still variable and depend on multiple factors. Therefore, there have been many efforts to improve the response to treatment and survival rates by either increasing the cytarabine dose or adding a third agent to the standard induction chemotherapy regimen. Unfortunately, attempts to improve response and survival have been mostly unsuccessful. Recent clinical trials and retrospective studies explored the addition of cladribine to standard induction chemotherapy for AML. Some of these studies showed higher rates of complete remission, and one showed improved survival. In this review, we will discuss the antileukemic properties of cladribine and summarize the recent clinical data regarding its incorporation into the induction therapy for adult AML.

Background: Whilst there is a broad selection of drugs licensed as disease modifying treatments (DMTs) for people with relapsing multiple sclerosis (pwRMS), access to DMTs remains restricted, particularly for people with progressive MS (pwPMS). Cladribine has shown efficacy at all stages of MS. Following withdrawal from the market of oral cladribine in 2011, partly due to issues associated with lymphopenia, and following a thorough risk assessment, we started using subcutaneously injected cladribine (Litak ® ) to treat both pwRMS and pwPMS. Here, we report on the real life safety and tolerability of this treatment option., Methods: Cladribine was offered to (i) pwRMS as a choice despite fulfilling NHS England (NHSE) criteria for licensed DMTs, and (ii) pwRMS and pwPMS not eligible for NHSE approved DMTs. To avoid lymphocyte depletion lower than 0.5 × 10 9 /l (WHO grade 2) cladribine was administered using a personalised dosing scheme (30-40 mg in week 1; and another 0-30 mg in week 5 pending total lymphocyte count at week 4). Anti-viral prophylaxis was given from day 1 for 60 days. Patients approaching week 48 were given a second treatment cycle. Data collection included side effects, relapses, change in disability and MRI indices., Results: Seventy-one pwMS (40 female, 31 male; 36 RMS, 35 PMS,) received at least one treatment cycle. Mean age for starting cladribine was 44 years (range 22-72 years), median EDSS was 5 (range 1-8.5). Maximum follow-up was 28 months. 35/71 pwMS were followed up for at least 20 weeks. These patients had a median EDSS of 5.0 (range 1.0-7.5) at baseline and 5.5 (range 1.0-8.0) after a mean follow-up of 11 months (range 5-28). Cladribine was well tolerated with very few treatment-related adverse events observed. Personalised dosing led to grade 1-2 lymphopenia in 50% of cases. A single patient developed transient grade 3 lymphopenia. No cases of varicella or other infections were observed. Four/17 people with relapsing MS, experienced a total of six relapses during a mean follow-up of 13 months (range 5-28 months). In people with PMS (n = 18) median EDSS was 5.5 (2.0-7.5) at baseline and 6.0 (2.5-7.5) after a median of 10 months (range 5-18). In pwPMS MRI showed that 25% had active scans at baseline, and 0% at follow-up., Conclusion: Personalised dosing of cladribine avoided severe lymphopenia in all but one patients and was very well tolerated across a large spectrum of disease severity. Our data suggests cladribine may offer benefit people with relapsing and progressive MS alike. The personalised protocol used appears safe, however warrants controlled studies to more definitively assess efficacy and safety, particularly in groups of pwMS who are not eligible for licensed DMT including oral cladribine (Mavenclad ® )., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objectives: The aims of this manuscript were to review the evidence for the efficacy and safety of cladribine in multiple sclerosis (MS) and to review the molecular and cellular mechanisms by which cladribine acts as a disease-modifying therapy in MS., Methods: This is a narrative review of the available clinical and preclinical data on the use of cladribine in MS., Results: Clinical trial data argue strongly that cladribine is a safe and effective therapy for relapsing MS and that it may also be beneficial in progressive MS. The pharmacology of cladribine explains how it is selectively toxic towards lymphocytes. Immunophenotyping studies show that cladribine depletes lymphocyte populations in vivo with a predilection for B cells. In vitro studies demonstrate that cladribine also exerts immunomodulatory influences over innate and adaptive immunity., Conclusions: Cladribine is a safe and effective form of induction therapy for relapsing MS. Its mechanism of benefit is not fully understood but the most striking action is selective, long-lasting, depletion of B lymphocytes with a particular predilection for memory B cells. The in vivo relevance of its other immunomodulatory actions is unknown. The hypothesis that cladribine's action of benefit is to deplete memory B cells is important: if correct, it implies that selective targeting of this cell population and sparing of other lymphocytes could modify disease activity without predisposing to immunosuppression-related complications., Competing Interests: Competing interest: DB reports being a founder and consultant to Canbex Therapeutics and receiving research funds from Canbex Therapeutics, Sanofi-Genzyme and Takeda in the past 3 years. GG reports receiving fees for participation in the advisory board for AbbVie Biotherapeutics, Biogen, Canbex, Ironwood, Novartis, Merck, Inc, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Synthon, Teva and Vertex; speaker fees from AbbVie, Biogen, Bayer HealthCare, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Sanofi-Aventis and Teva and research support from Biogen, Genzyme, Ironwood, Merck, Inc, Merck Serono and Novartis. KS reports being a principal investigator of trials sponsored by Novartis, Roche, Teva and Medday; involved in trials sponsored by Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, BIAL, Cytokinetics and Canbex and receiving speaking honoraria for lecturing and advisory activity and/or meeting support from Biogen, Merck, Inc, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. All authors have presented posters at the European Congress for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) annual congress., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

To assess treatment response and overall survival (OS) in refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) patients treated by different common salvage chemotherapy regimens.Medical records data from 142 R/R AML patients were reviewed in this retrospective study. Patients were treated with regimens based on the following drugs: cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and fludarabine (FLAG) (n = 46); cytarabine and G-CSF in addition to aclarubicin or daunorubicin (CAG/DAG) (n = 30); cytarabine, G-CSF, and cladribine (CLAG) (n = 27); cytarabine, etoposide, and mitoxantrone (MEA) (n = 17); cytarabine plus idarubicin, daunorubicin, or mitoxantrone (IA/DA/MA) (n = 12); and homoharringtonine, cytarabine, and aclarubicin or daunorubicin (HAA/HAD) (n = 10).A total of 43 (35.2%) patients achieved complete remission (CR), 60 (49.2%) patients achieved overall remission rate (ORR), and 18 (14.8%) patients received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) after CR. Median OS was 8.0 (95% CI 6.6-9.4) months with a 1-year OS rate of (29.9 ± 3.9)% and 3-year OS rate of (11.1 ± 3.6)%. No difference of CR (P = .621), ORR (P = .385), and allo-HSCT (P = .537) achievement was observed among different chemotherapy regimens. Interestingly, we observed that the CLAG-based regimen did not affect CR (P = .165), while it achieved a numerically higher ORR (P = .093) and was an independent factor for prolonged OS (P = .016). No other regimens were determined to be correlated with CR, ORR, or OS.FLAG-, CAG/DAG-, CLAG-, MEA-, IA/DA/MA- and HAA/HAD-based regimens were found to achieve similar CR rates, while the CLAG-based regimen achieved numerically higher ORR rates and significant favorable OS. Therefore, CLAG-based regimens should be a prioritized treatment option for R/R AML patients.

Objective: To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of cladribine tablets versus alternative disease modifying treatments (DMTs) in patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), and in a subgroup with high disease activity (HRA + DAT), using systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA)., Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, MEDLINE In-Process and CENTRAL databases were systematically searched to identify English-language publications of relevant studies of approved DMTs for RRMS. Searches were conducted from database inception to January 2017. Conference websites and trial registries were also searched. NMA considered the effects of DMTs on annualized relapse rate (ARR), confirmed disease progression (CDP), no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) and safety., Results: Of 10,825 articles retrieved and screened, 44 studies assessing 12 DMTs contributed to the NMA. In patients with active RRMS, cladribine tablets were associated with a significant 58% reduction in ARR versus placebo (p < .05); cladribine tablets were similar or significantly better than other DMT regimens and ranked fourth among DMTs, behind alemtuzumab, natalizumab and ocrelizumab. For CDP for 6 months and NEDA, improvements with cladribine tablets were significantly greater than those of placebo (p < .05), with no comparator DMT demonstrating significantly better results. Similar findings were reported in the HRA + DAT population. Overall adverse event risk for cladribine tablets did not differ significantly from that of placebo and most alternative DMTs., Conclusion: In this first NMA to consider cladribine tablets, ocrelizumab and daclizumab for treatment of RRMS, cladribine tablets are a comparatively effective and safe alternative to other DMTs in both active RRMS and HRA + DAT populations.

Background: The mechanism of action of oral cladribine, recently licensed for relapsing multiple sclerosis, is unknown., Objective: To determine whether cladribine depletes memory B cells consistent with our recent hypothesis that effective, disease-modifying treatments act by physical/functional depletion of memory B cells., Methods: A cross-sectional study examined 40 people with multiple sclerosis at the end of the first cycle of alemtuzumab or injectable cladribine. The relative proportions and absolute numbers of peripheral blood B lymphocyte subsets were measured using flow cytometry. Cell-subtype expression of genes involved in cladribine metabolism was examined from data in public repositories., Results: Cladribine markedly depleted class-switched and unswitched memory B cells to levels comparable with alemtuzumab, but without the associated initial lymphopenia. CD3 + T cell depletion was modest. The mRNA expression of metabolism genes varied between lymphocyte subsets. A high ratio of deoxycytidine kinase to group I cytosolic 5' nucleotidase expression was present in B cells and was particularly high in mature, memory and notably germinal centre B cells, but not plasma cells., Conclusions: Selective B cell cytotoxicity coupled with slow repopulation kinetics results in long-term, memory B cell depletion by cladribine. These may offer a new target, possibly with potential biomarker activity, for future drug development.

Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated and neurodegenerative disease with an unpredictable outcome. Immune-modulatory treatment aims at decreasing long-term disability. With the increasing number of treatment options, it is essential to fully digest the possible side effects of the available therapeutics and to monitor patients is essential., Areas Covered: All approved disease-modifying drugs (DMD) for MS are discussed in this review. Mode of action, adverse effects, reported risks for infections and malignancies, and pregnancy related issues are discussed in the review. The authors also provide suggestions for monitoring therapy. For all approved DMDs the pivotal studies have been included for possible side effects, as well as reports by health authorities. For this manuscript, PubMed was checked for reports on side effects for various drugs., Expert Opinion: Treatment options in MS are manifold, each carrying different risks. The safety-risk profile for approved agents is favorable. Knowing and monitoring these possible side effects is essential to minimize risks associated with treatment. Presently, the long-term experience for some of these therapies is missing and this must be addressed.

In the UK, there are twelve disease-modifying drugs licensed for various forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), of which three are oral therapies. An oral formulation of cladribine (Mavenclad - Merck Serono Europe Limited) was recently licensed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of adult patients with highly active relapsing MS. 1,2 It is claimed to be "an innovatively simple approach" for treating this form of MS and "the only disease modifying therapy that can deliver and sustain 4 years of disease control with a maximum of 20 days oral treatment in the first 2 years." 3 Here, we consider the evidence for its use in the treatment of highly active relapsing MS., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.)

Introduction: No standard salvage chemotherapy regimen is available for relapsed or refractory (RR) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Preclinical data have suggested synergy in vitro between cytarabine and imatinib mesylate (IM) on AML cell growth inhibition. After demonstrating the safety and feasibility in a phase I study, we conducted a phase II clinical study of CLAG (cladribine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) regimen combined with IM for patients with RR-AML., Patients and Methods: We performed a single-institution 2-stage phase II study. The primary endpoint was the remission rate measured using the standard AML response criteria. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: From August 2009 to April 2011, 38 patients were treated at the Moffitt Cancer Center. Their median age was 62 years (range, 26-79 years). Of the 38 patients, 7 (18%) had refractory AML, 19 (50%) had early relapse, and 12 (32%) had late relapse. At the original diagnosis, only 2 patients had favorable risk factors, 18 had intermediate risk, and 16 had poor risk; for 2 patients, the karyotype was missing. The overall response rate for all 38 evaluable patients was 37%. The median OS was 11.1 months (95% CI, 4.8-13.4 months), the median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI, 1.6-11.7 months). Among the responders, 8 of 14 patients subsequently underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation., Conclusion: CLAG plus IM was well tolerated, with encouraging signs of activity in patients with poor-risk AML., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Despite recent progress, currently available therapies for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) are only partly effective, and their use is limited by tolerability and safety issues, as well as high cost. Cladribine was originally rejected by the regulatory authorities in both the European Union and USA in 2011, but in June 2017 the European Medical Agency recommended marketing authorization for treatment of aggressive relapsing MS. Areas covered: We provide an update on chemistry, mechanism of action, efficacy and safety of cladribine for the treatment of MS. Expert opinion: Cladribine is well tolerated, it is dosed orally in cycles of one year, the need for regular blood testing during treatment is likely limited, and the two-year efficacy data for treatment of relapsing MS are at least in the same range as the most efficient licensed treatments. The increased risk of malignancies reported in the pivotal trial seems to be caused by unexpectedly low numbers of malignancies in the placebo group. Cladribine could therefore be an alternative for many patients with relapsing remitting MS. The main caveat is the lack of long term efficacy and safety data. Currently there are insufficient data to guide further treatment of patients who have completed two treatment cycles of cladribine.

Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis (PLCH) is a rare sporadic cystic lung disease of unknown aetiology that is characterised by the infiltration and destruction of the wall of distal bronchioles by CD1a + Langerhans-like cells. In adults, PLCH is frequently isolated and affects young smokers of both sexes. Recent multicentre studies have led to the more standardised management of patients in clinical practice. Smoking cessation is essential and is occasionally the only suitable intervention. Serial lung function testing is important because a significant proportion of patients may experience an early decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s and develop airflow obstruction. Cladribine was reported to dramatically improve progressive PLCH in some patients. Its efficacy and tolerance are currently being evaluated. Patients who complain of unexplained dyspnoea with decreased diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide should be screened for pulmonary hypertension by Doppler echocardiography, which must be confirmed by right heart catheterisation. Lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for patients with advanced PLCH.The identification of the BRAF V600E mutation in approximately half of Langerhans cell histiocytosis lesions, including PLCH, and other mutations of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in a subset of lesions has led to targeted treatments (BRAF and MEK (MAPK kinase) inhibitors). These treatments need to be rigorously evaluated because of their potentially severe side-effects., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Disclosures can be found alongside this article at err.ersjournals.com, (Copyright ©ERS 2017.)

Importance: While cladribine is best known for the treatment of hairy cell leukemia and other lymphoid cancers, it also has activity against myeloid neoplasms, such as Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD)., Objective: To assess the efficacy of cladribine (2-chloro-2'-deoxyadenosine) in the treatment of ECD., Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was a single-institution retrospective medical record review from January 1, 1998, to April 6, 2016, at a tertiary academic medical center. In all eligible cases, the diagnosis of ECD was made using clinical criteria in conjunction with histopathologic findings., Exposure: Cladribine therapy in first-line treatment or later., Main Outcomes and Measures: Two response criteria were used, clinical and radiological. For clinical response, the following criteria were used: complete response (complete resolution of symptoms attributed to ECD), partial response (partial resolution of symptoms attributed to ECD), stable disease (no change in symptoms attributed to ECD), and progressive disease (worsening of symptoms attributed to ECD). For radiological response, the following categories were used: complete response (complete resolution of proven or suspected lesion due to ECD), partial response (partial resolution of proven or suspected lesion due to ECD), stable disease (no significant change in proven or suspected lesion due to ECD for ≥3 months), and progressive disease (progression or worsening of proven or suspected lesion due to ECD)., Results: A total of 63 adult patients with confirmed ECD were identified. Their median age at diagnosis of ECD was 54 years (age range, 18-80 years), and 67% (42 of 63) were male. Cladribine was the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agent and was administered in 21 of 63 patients (33%). Their median age at the time of cladribine therapy was 62 years (age range, 40-78 years). Cladribine was used as the first-line treatment in 9 patients and as later-line treatment in the remaining 12 patients. The median number of cycles of cladribine administered was 2.5 (range, 1-6). The overall clinical response rate was 52% (9 of 17) (6% [1 of 17] complete response and 46% [8 of 17] partial response), with 18% (3 of 17) stable disease and 30% (5 of 17) progressive disease. Among patients who responded to cladribine therapy, the median duration of clinical response was 9 months (range, 6-129 months), with ongoing response in 2 patients. The overall radiological response rate was 54% (8 of 15) (all partial response), with 26% (4 of 15) stable disease and 20% (2 of 15) progressive disease. Treatment-related adverse effects included 2 infectious complications (pneumonia and central line infection, both requiring hospitalization) and 2 hematologic adverse effects (grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 neutropenia, both requiring therapy discontinuation)., Conclusions and Relevance: Cladribine has moderate clinical efficacy in the treatment of ECD and can be considered a treatment option in cases without the BRAF V600E mutation. It is generally well tolerated and may result in a durable response.

Histiocytic sarcoma, a rare hematopoietic neoplasm with evidence of histiocytic differentiation, is often refractory to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and its prognosis is generally dismal. The optimal management of this malignancy has not been established. We report a case of 8-year-old girl with histiocytic sarcoma involving the left femur. The tumor rapidly responded to a combination of cladribine and high-dose cytosine arabinoside, an aggressive salvage regimen for refractory Langerhans cell histiocytosis, and became impalpable during the first cycle. The patient has remained in complete remission more than 7 years from diagnosis.

IgM flare is a transient, treatment-induced, increase of monoclonal IgM levels in lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia (LPL/WM) patients. Until recently this phenomenon was observed in patients treated with Cladribine and Rituximab. Here we report a case of a heavily pretreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patient with an atypically high immunoglobulin production who developed clinically significant immunoglobulin flare following Idelalisib treatment.

The purine analogue 2-chloro-deoxyadenosine (2-CDA, cladribine) +/- rituximab has been successfully tested in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (MALT lymphoma) patients. However, studies using cladribine in other indications have reported the potential for prolonged hematological side effects and secondary hematologic and non-hematologic malignancies. To date, there have been no data on long-term effects of cladribine in MALT lymphoma patients. We have analyzed a large number of 49 patients treated with cladribine at our institution 1997-2011. All patients were treated within clinical trials and had undergone a standardized follow-up protocol minimizing a potential bias in the detection of late sequels and relapses. After a median follow-up time of 61 months (interquartile range: 43-72) for 49 analyzed patients, 35 (71%) are alive, while 14 (29%) have died. In the entire collective, three cases (6%) of prolonged pancytopenia including manifest myelodysplastic syndrome in one patient (2%), three cases (6%) of secondary lymphoid malignancies, and five cases (10%) of non-hematologic cancers were documented. In terms of outcome, 42/49 (86%) patients responded to cladribine-containing treatment, and only 10/42 (24%) responding patients needed further treatment after a median time to progression of 14 months (interquartile range, 8-34). Currently, 25/35 (71%) patients being alive are in ongoing complete remission and 2/35 (6%) in ongoing stable disease, respectively. Eight patients (23%) are free of lymphoma after second-line therapy, with the median overall survival not having been reached. Our data suggest that cladribine might be safely applied in patients with MALT lymphoma, also in terms of long-term toxicities. These data also confirm the potential of cladribine to induce durable remissions. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., (Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: The treatment of multiple sclerosis has changed over the last 20 years. The advent of disease-modifying drugs in the mid-1990s heralded a period of rapid progress in the understanding and management of multiple sclerosis. With the support of magnetic resonance imaging early diagnosis is possible, enabling treatment initiation at the time of the first clinical attack. As most of the disease-modifying drugs are associated with adverse events, patients and clinicians need to weigh the benefit and safety of the various early treatment options before taking informed decisions., Objectives: 1. to estimate the benefit and safety of disease-modifying drugs that have been evaluated in all studies (randomised or non-randomised) for the treatment of a first clinical attack suggestive of MS compared either with placebo or no treatment;2. to assess the relative efficacy and safety of disease-modifying drugs according to their benefit and safety;3. to estimate the benefit and safety of disease-modifying drugs that have been evaluated in all studies (randomised or non-randomised) for treatment started after a first attack ('early treatment') compared with treatment started after a second attack or at another later time point ('delayed treatment')., Search Methods: We searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the CNS Group Trials Register, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, clinicaltrials.gov, the WHO trials registry, and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports, and searched for unpublished studies (until December 2016)., Selection Criteria: We included randomised and observational studies that evaluated one or more drugs as monotherapy in adult participants with a first clinical attack suggestive of MS. We considered evidence on alemtuzumab, azathioprine, cladribine, daclizumab, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate, immunoglobulins, interferon beta-1b, interferon beta-1a (Rebif®, Avonex®), laquinimod, mitoxantrone, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, pegylated interferon beta-1a, rituximab and teriflunomide., Data Collection and Analysis: Two teams of three authors each independently selected studies and extracted data. The primary outcomes were disability-worsening, relapses, occurrence of at least one serious adverse event (AE) and withdrawing from the study or discontinuing the drug because of AEs. Time to conversion to clinically definite MS (CDMS) defined by Poser diagnostic criteria, and probability to discontinue the treatment or dropout for any reason were recorded as secondary outcomes. We synthesized study data using random-effects meta-analyses and performed indirect comparisons between drugs. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) along with relative 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all outcomes. We estimated the absolute effects only for primary outcomes. We evaluated the credibility of the evidence using the GRADE system., Main Results: We included 10 randomised trials, eight open-label extension studies (OLEs) and four cohort studies published between 2010 and 2016. The overall risk of bias was high and the reporting of AEs was scarce. The quality of the evidence associated with the results ranges from low to very low. Early treatment versus placebo during the first 24 months' follow-upThere was a small, non-significant advantage of early treatment compared with placebo in disability-worsening (6.4% fewer (13.9 fewer to 3 more) participants with disability-worsening with interferon beta-1a (Rebif®) or teriflunomide) and in relapses (10% fewer (20.3 fewer to 2.8 more) participants with relapses with teriflunomide). Early treatment was associated with 1.6% fewer participants with at least one serious AE (3 fewer to 0.2 more). Participants on early treatment were on average 4.6% times (0.3 fewer to 15.4 more) more likely to withdraw from the study due to AEs. This result was mostly driven by studies on interferon beta 1-b, glatiramer acetate and cladribine that were associated with significantly more withdrawals for AEs. Early treatment decreased the hazard of conversion to CDMS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.60). Comparing active interventions during the first 24 months' follow-upIndirect comparison of interferon beta-1a (Rebif®) with teriflunomide did not show any difference on reducing disability-worsening (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.66). We found no differences between the included drugs with respect to the hazard of conversion to CDMS. Interferon beta-1a (Rebif®) and teriflunomide were associated with fewer dropouts because of AEs compared with interferon beta-1b, cladribine and glatiramer acetate (ORs range between 0.03 and 0.29, with substantial uncertainty). Early versus delayed treatmentWe did not find evidence of differences between early and delayed treatments for disability-worsening at a maximum of five years' follow-up (3% fewer participants with early treatment (15 fewer to 11.1 more)). There was important variability across interventions; early treatment with interferon beta-1b considerably reduced the odds of participants with disability-worsening during three and five years' follow-up (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.84 and OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.89). The early treatment group had 19.6% fewer participants with relapses (26.7 fewer to 12.7 fewer) compared to late treatment at a maximum of five years' follow-up and early treatment decreased the hazard of conversion to CDMS at any follow-up up to 10 years (i.e. over five years' follow-up HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.73). We did not draw any conclusions on long-term serious AEs or discontinuation due to AEs because of inadequacies in the available data both in the included OLEs and cohort studies., Authors' Conclusions: Very low-quality evidence suggests a small and uncertain benefit with early treatment compared with placebo in reducing disability-worsening and relapses. The advantage of early treatment compared with delayed on disability-worsening was heterogeneous depending on the actual drug used and based on very low-quality evidence. Low-quality evidence suggests that the chances of relapse are less with early treatment compared with delayed. Early treatment reduced the hazard of conversion to CDMS compared either with placebo, no treatment or delayed treatment, both in short- and long-term follow-up. Low-quality evidence suggests that early treatment is associated with fewer participants with at least one serious AE compared with placebo. Very low-quality evidence suggests that, compared with placebo, early treatment leads to more withdrawals or treatment discontinuation due to AEs. Difference between drugs on short-term benefit and safety was uncertain because few studies and only indirect comparisons were available. Long-term safety of early treatment is uncertain because of inadequately reported or unavailable data.

Background: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare opportunistic brain infection caused by the human polyomavirus JC (JCPyV). A particular problem with the drug cladribine seems to be prolonged suppression of the CD4+ T-cells, a well-known risk factor for PML., Case Description: A 67-year-old male presented with a 3-weeks history of unsteady gait, dysarthria and a dysfunctional right arm. Seven years earlier, he had been diagnosed with urticaria pigmentosa, and 2 years later aggressive systemic mastocytosis. Cladribine treatment was initiated and regarded effective, but the course was complicated with bouts of severe anemia and recurrent episodes of salmonella associated gastroenteritis. His lymphocyte count fell to 0.1×10 9 /L at its lowest level, but gradually rose. Despite this, in the 6 month wake of the last dose of cladribine given, the patient experienced herpetic stomatitis, had CMV present in blood, and ultimately developed the neurological symptoms. An MRI scan revealed a lesion in the right cerebellar hemisphere compatible with PML, and PCR analysis of the CSF showed positive for JCPyV DNA with a load of 323 950 copies/ml. No pathological cells were seen on CSF flow cytometry. The CD4/CD8-ratio was 0.45 (160 CD4+ cells/mm 3 and 360 CD8+ cells/mm 3 ). The patient passed away 3 weeks later., Conclusion: PML may be the consequence of prolonged lymphopenia due to the use of cladribine., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We report our single-center experience with cytarabine and idarubicin for induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an additional 5 days of cladribine (IAC therapy). From July 2012 to September 2014, 38 patients completed a full course of IAC induction. Median patient age was 61 years, 61% of patients were ≥60 years old, and 71% were male. The complete remission (CR) rate was 63% following a single induction course, three patients (8%) required a second induction course to achieve CR, for an overall response rate of 71%. The median duration of severe neutropenia was 30.5 days. Thirty-two percent of patients developed mucositis, 76% experienced diarrhea, and 61% developed a rash. Incidence of CR following IAC induction therapy for AML was comparable to historical data, but with frequent diarrhea, rash, and fungal infections. This study found IAC efficacy and toxicity was similar irrespective of age., (Copyright© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

An international phase 2 study combining cladribine and cytarabine (Ara-C) was initiated for patients with refractory, risk-organ-positive Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) in 2005. The protocol, comprising at least two 5-day courses of Ara-C (1 g/m(2) per day) plus cladribine (9 mg/m(2) per day) followed by maintenance therapy, was administered to 27 patients (median age at diagnosis, 0.7 years; median follow-up, 5.3 years). At inclusion, all patients were refractory after at least 1 course of vinblastine (VBL) plus corticosteroid, all had liver and spleen involvement, and 25 patients had hematologic cytopenia. After 2 courses, disease status was nonactive (n = 2), better (n = 23), or stable (n = 2), with an overall response rate of 92%. Median disease activity scores decreased from 12 at the start of therapy to 3 after 2 courses (P < .0001). During maintenance therapy, 4 patients experienced reactivation in risk organs. There were 4 deaths; 2 were related to therapy toxicity and 2 were related to reactivation. All patients experienced severe toxicity, with World Health Organization grade 4 hematologic toxicity and 6 documented severe infections. The overall 5-year survival rate was 85% (95% confidence interval, 65.2%-94.2%). Thus, the combination of cladribine/Ara-C is effective therapy for refractory multisystem LCH but is associated with high toxicity., (© 2015 by The American Society of Hematology.)