Search

Background: Autologous fat is a safe and effective soft tissue filler. Recent evidence also suggests improved wound healing and immune modulation with fat grafting., Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe a novel technique utilizing fat grafting during primary open rhinoplasty. We hypothesize a more rapid resolution of bruising and edema., Methods: Patients who underwent rhinoplasty were reviewed and compared by presence or absence of concurrent fat grafting. Three-dimensional images were analyzed employing Mirror (Vectra, Canfield Scientific, NJ). Ecchymoses were outlined utilizing a magnetic lasso followed by an area measurement. Volumetric edema measurements were also taken and assessed. Edema and ecchymosis were measured at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05., Results: Sixty-two patients were included. Thirty-three patients (53.2%) received autologous fat grafting and 29 (46.8%) did not. Age, gender, surgical approach, and osteotomy distribution were similar between the groups. The fat grafted group showed 7.29 cm2 fewer ecchymoses (P < 0.001) and 0.73 cc less edema (P = 0.68) in the early postoperative interval. Six weeks postoperatively, the fat grafted group showed 1 cc less edema (P = 0.36) with negligible differences in bruising., Conclusions: Autologous fat grafting is a useful adjunct to rhinoplasty and is associated with significantly fewer ecchymoses in the acute postoperative period., (© 2019 The Aesthetic Society. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: To the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared the patient profiles for 1- versus 2-team surgery within head and neck oncosurgery., Patients and Methods: A retrospective study of the data from 2968 patients who had undergone concurrent head and neck extirpative and reconstructive surgery in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2010 to 2017) was conducted. Patients were stratified into 1- and 2-team surgery groups, and the demographic data were compared. Univariate analyses of the outcomes before and after propensity score matching were conducted., Results: Most ablative and reconstructive head and neck procedures (68.5%) were performed using a 1-team approach. The patients who had undergone 2-team surgery were more likely to have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (P < .001), to require mandibulectomy (P < .001) or glossectomy (P < .001), and to receive a microvascular free flap (P < .001) but were less likely to require parotidectomy (P < .001) or to receive a rotational flap (P < .001). Before propensity score matching, the patients undergoing 2-team surgery had longer operative times (P < .001), longer postoperative stays (P < .001), greater rates of a return to the operating room (P = .001), and an increased rate of complications (P < .001). After propensity score matching, the 2-team approach continued to have longer operative times (P < .001) and an increased incidence of complications (P < .001) but no significant differences in the length of stay or rate of return to the operating room after Bonferroni's correction., Conclusions: Nationally, most head and neck ablative and reconstructive surgeries were completed by 1 team. More complicated reconstructive procedures involving microvascular free flaps have been more commonly performed by 2 teams, resulting in slightly longer operative times and greater associated complication rates., (Copyright © 2019 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This study sought to compare patient demographics, operative course, and peri-operative outcomes between unilateral and bilateral cleft patients. Primary cleft lip repairs were isolated from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric Database (NSQIP-P). Unilateral and bilateral cases of primary cleft lip were identified by ICD codes. Demographics, comorbidities, and post-operative outcomes were compared between cohorts. Patients were propensity matched to control for differences before repeating the analysis. About 4550 cleft lip repairs were evaluated over the 5-year period. Of the cases where the cleft type was identifiable, 75.5% were unilateral clefts and 24.5% were bilateral clefts. The bilateral cleft population had significantly more comorbidities including higher rates of ventilator dependence (1.0% versus 0.4%, p  = 0.02), asthma (1.6% versus 0.7%, p  = 0.011), tracheostomy (1.6% versus 0.5%, p  < 0.001), gastrointestinal disease (16.9% versus 12.7%, p  < 0.001), previous cardiac surgery (3.6% versus 2.2%, p  = 0.015), developmental delay (9.9% versus 4.6%, p  < 0.001), structural central nervous system abnormalities (5.0% versus 2.5%, p  < 0.001), and nutritional support (8.0% versus 3.2%, p  < 0.001). Following propensity matching, there were no significant differences in complications, readmissions, or reoperations between the cohorts. Patients with bilateral cleft lip have significantly more comorbidities than unilateral cleft lip patients. However, peri-operative outcomes are comparable between the groups.

Background: The impact of insurance and socioeconomic status on breast reconstruction modalities when access to care is controlled is unknown., Methods: Records for patients who underwent breast reconstruction at an academic medical center between 2013 and 2017 were reviewed and analyzed using chi-square analysis and logistic regression., Results: One thousand six hundred eighty-three breast reconstructions were analyzed. The commercially insured were more likely to undergo microvascular autologous breast reconstruction (44.4 percent versus 31.3 percent; p < 0.001), with an odds ratio of 2.22, whereas patients with Medicare and Medicaid were significantly more likely to receive tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction, with an odds ratio of 1.42 (41.7 percent versus 47.7 percent; p = 0.013). Comparing all patients with microvascular reconstruction, the commercially insured were more likely to receive a perforator flap (79.7 percent versus 55.3 percent versus 43.9 percent), with an odds ratio of 4.23 (p < 0.001). When stratifying patients by median household income, those in the highest income quartile were most likely to receive a perforator flap (82.1 percent) (p < 0.001), whereas those in the lowest income quartile were most likely to receive a muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (36.4 percent) (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Patients at the same academic medical center had significantly different breast reconstruction modalities when stratified by insurance and household income. Despite similar access to care, differences in insurance types may favor higher rates of perforator flap breast reconstruction among the commercially insured., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Risk, II.

Objective: The Veau classification represents the most commonly used system for characterizing cleft palate severity. Conflicting evidence exists as to how increasing Veau classification affects outcomes. This study compared perioperative outcomes between Veau III and IV cleft palate repairs., Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric (NSQIP-P) database was used to identify cleft palate repairs between 2012 and 2016 using CPT codes. Patients with alveolar bone grafts were excluded. Veau III (unilateral) and Veau IV (bilateral) cleft palate repairs were identified using International Classification of Disease code 9 and 10 (ICD-9 and -10 codes. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and adverse events were compared between the cohorts., Results: A total of 5026 patients underwent cleft palate repair between 2012 and 2016. Of the 2114 patients with identifiable Veau classification, 1302 had Veau III cleft palates and 812 had Veau IV cleft palates.The Veau IV cleft palate patient population was older (377.8 versus 354.1 days, P < 0.001) and had significantly more comorbidities including a higher incidence of chronic lung disease (P = 0.014), airway abnormalities (P = 0.001), developmental delay (P = 0.018), structural central nervous system deformities (P < 0.001), and nutritional support (P < 0.001). Veau IV cleft palate repairs also had longer operative times (153.2 versus 140.2 minutes, P < 0.001). Despite significant differences in comorbidities and perioperative factors, there were no differences in 30-day complications, readmissions, or reoperation rates between Veau III and IV cleft palate repairs., Conclusions: Patients undergoing Veau IV cleft palate repair have a significantly greater number of comorbidities than Veau III cleft palate repairs. Despite differences in patient populations, 30-day surgical outcomes are comparable between the cohorts.

Background: Cleft lip is the most common craniofacial malformation with an incidence of 1 in 700 live births. Our study sought to evaluate incidences and risk factors readmission following CLP repair using a well-validated national surgical database., Methods: All cleft lip repairs performed between 2012 and 2016 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric Database. Patient demographics, surgical variables, and reasons for readmission were analyzed and identified. A binary logistic regression was performed to identify factors independently associated with readmission following cleft lip repair., Results: The 4550 cleft lip repairs were identified with a thirty-day readmission rate of 3.8% (173 patients). A higher incidence of readmission was identified among patients with developmental delay (P ≤0.001), seizure disorder (P <0.001), structural central nervous system abnormality (P ≤0.001), steroid use within 30 days (P ≤0.001), a requirement for nutritional support (P <0.001), and ASA of 3 or higher (17.3% vs 9.9%, P <0.001). Readmitted patients were more likely to have deep incisional surgical site infections (P <0.001), deep wound dehiscence (P = 0.002), reoperation (P <0.001), pneumonia (P <0.001), and unplanned intubation (P <0.001).Multivariate regression identified seizure disorder (OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.3-8.3; P = 0.012) and steroid use within 30 days (OR = 3.8; 95% CI = 1.1-12.2; P = 0.030) as independently associated with readmission. The mean time of readmission was 9 days after operation., Conclusion: Patients with seizure disorder and steroid use were significantly more likely to be readmitted. Physicians should be cautious with management of patients with these risk factors.

Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) are generally preventable causes of increased cost, morbidity, and mortality. Further, HAI carry penalties in the era of hospital value-based care. However, very little is known about the incidence and outcomes of HAI among patients hospitalized with common cardiovascular conditions. Using a national database, we identified adults aged ≥18 years hospitalized with 5 common cardiovascular conditions, including heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, cardiogenic shock, and atrial fibrillation or flutter. We assessed for temporal trends in incidence, cost, length of stay (LOS), and mortality associated with ventilator-associated pneumonia, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, central line-associated bloodstream infection, and Clostridium difficile infections. Between 2008 and 2015, we identified 159,021 hospitalizations ≥1 HAI (49.6% heart failure, 20.4% acute myocardial infarction, 10.5% coronary artery bypass grafting, 18.6% cardiogenic shock, and 11.9% atrial fibrillation or flutter). Clostridium difficile infections (75.4%) were the most common followed by catheter-associated urinary tract infections (15.1%), ventilator-associated pneumonia (7.9%), and central line-associated bloodstream infection (3.1%). Nearly half of the patients (46.3%) with HAI required discharge to a skilled care facility compared with 15.7% of patients who did not. After propensity matching, HAI remained associated with an increased LOS (4.9 vs 9.6 days, p <0.0001), total hospital charges ($79,227 vs $50,699, p <0.0001), and in-hospital mortality (13% vs 10.4%, p <0.0001) compared with patients who did not acquire a HAI. In conclusion, patients with cardiovascular disease acquiring a HAI had substantially higher costs, LOS, and mortality., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Microvascular reconstruction is the standard of care in head and neck reconstruction, though its perioperative safety in an older population has been controversial due to safety concerns, warranting further investigation., Materials and Methods: An "older" (≥71 years) cohort undergoing reconstruction after mandibulectomy/glossectomy was compared to the remaining population in a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2008-2016) analysis. Cases required both a mandibulectomy/glossectomy and microvascular or local flap reconstruction (exclusion criteria: missing ages and simultaneous microvascular and local flap reconstruction). Demographics, comorbidities, and procedure types were analyzed on 985 patients (236 [24.4%] were ≥71). Outcomes were compared by reconstruction type. Regressions were performed calculating the impact of age on length of hospital stay (LOHS) and operative time., Results: Ablative procedures were comparable, but older patients received local flaps at higher rates (22.5% vs. 9.6%; p < .001). The older population had more comorbidities (higher ASA class [p < .001], diabetes [p < .001], and hypertension [p < .001]). After Bonferroni correction, univariate subgroup analyses of soft tissue and bone/composite microvascular flaps revealed similar outcomes (except increased medical complications in the older cohort undergoing a bone free flap [p = .002]). Controlling for a variety of factors, older age resulted in longer LOHS (B: 1.4 days; 95% CI: 0.1-2.8 days; p = .035), but not operative time (B: -21.90 min; 95% CI: -52.76 to 8.96 min; p = .164)., Conclusion: While increased age (≥70 years) was associated with a longer LOHS, complication rates were comparable. Although limited by the retrospective nature, evidence supports microvascular reconstruction in the elderly population with comparable outcomes., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objective: Previous studies have identified the impact of affective disorders on preoperative and postoperative perception of pain. However, there is a scarcity of data identifying the impact of affective disorders on postdischarge narcotic refills. The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with affective disorders have more narcotic refills after complex spinal fusion for deformity correction., Methods: The medical records of 121 adult (≥18 years old) spine deformity patients undergoing elective, primary complex spinal fusion (≥5 level) for deformity correction at a major academic institution from 2010 to 2015 were reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, baseline and postoperative patient-reported pain scores, ambulatory status, and narcotic refills were collected for each patient. The primary outcome was the rate of 6-week and 3-month narcotic refills., Results: Of the 121 patients, 43 (35.5%) had a clinical diagnosis of anxiety or depression (affective disorder) (AD n = 43; No-AD n = 78). Preoperative narcotic use was significantly higher in the AD cohort (AD 65.9% vs. No-AD 37.7%, P = 0.0035). The AD cohort had significantly higher pain scores at baseline (AD 6.5 ± 2.9 vs. No-AD 4.7 ± 3.1, P = 0.004) and at the first postoperative pain score reported (AD 6.7 ± 2.6 vs. No-AD 5.6 ± 2.9, P = 0.049). However, there were no significant differences in narcotic refills at 6 weeks (AD 34.9% vs. No-AD 25.6%, P = 0.283) and 3 months (AD 23.8% vs. No-AD 17.4%, P = 0.411) after discharge between the cohorts., Conclusions: Our study suggests that whereas spinal deformity patients with affective disorders may have a higher baseline perception of pain and narcotic use, the impact of affective disorders on narcotic refills at 6 weeks and 3 months may be minimal after complex spinal fusion., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Health policy changes have led to increased emphasis on value-based care to improve resource utilization and reduce inpatient hospital length of stay (LOS). Recently, LOS has become a major determinant of quality of care and resource utilization. For adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), the determinants of extended LOS after elective posterior spinal fusion (PSF) remain relatively unknown. In the present study, the authors investigated the impact of patient and hospital-level risk factors on extended LOS following elective PSF surgery (≥ 4 levels) for AIS., Methods: The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) was queried for the year 2012. Adolescent patients (age range 10-17 years) with AIS undergoing elective PSF (≥ 4 levels) were selected using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification coding system. Extended hospital LOS was defined as greater than the 75th percentile for the entire cohort (> 6 days), and patients were dichotomized as having normal LOS or extended LOS. Patient demographics, comorbidities, complications, LOS, discharge disposition, and total cost were recorded. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the odds ratio for risk-adjusted LOS. The primary outcome was the degree to which patient comorbidities or postoperative complications correlated with extended LOS., Results: Comorbidities were overall significantly higher in the extended-LOS cohort than the normal-LOS cohort. Patients with extended LOS had a significantly greater proportion of blood transfusion (p < 0.001) and ≥ 9 vertebral levels fused (p < 0.001). The overall complication rates were greater in the extended-LOS cohort (20.3% [normal-LOS group] vs 43.5% [extended-LOS group]; p < 0.001). On average, the extended-LOS cohort incurred $18,916 more in total cost than the normal-LOS group ($54,697 ± $24,217 vs $73,613 ± $38,689, respectively; p < 0.001) and had more patients discharged to locations other than home (p < 0.001) than did patients in the normal-LOS cohort. On multivariate logistic regression, several risk factors were associated with extended LOS, including female sex, obesity, hypertension, fluid electrolyte disorder, paralysis, blood transfusion, ≥ 9 vertebrae fused, dural injury, and nerve cord injury. The odds ratio for extended LOS was 1.95 (95% CI 1.50-2.52) for patients with 1 complication and 5.43 (95% CI 3.35-8.71) for patients with > 1 complication., Conclusions: The authors' study using the KID demonstrates that patient comorbidities and intra- and postoperative complications all contribute to extended LOS after spinal fusion for AIS. Identifying multimodality interventions focused on reducing LOS, bettering patient outcomes, and lowering healthcare costs are necessary to improve the overall value of care for patients undergoing spinal fusion for AIS.

Introduction: Cleft palate repair has rare, but potentially life-threatening risks. Understanding the risk factors for adverse events following cleft palate repair can guide surgeons in risk stratification and parental counseling., Methods: Patients under 2 years of age in National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Pediatric Database (NSQIP-P) from 2012 to 2016 who underwent primary cleft palate repair were identified. Risk factors for adverse events after cleft palate repair were identified., Results: Outcomes for 4989 patients were reviewed. Mean age was 1.0 ± 0.3 years and 53.5% were males. Adverse events occurred in 6.4% (320) of patients. The wound dehiscence rate was 3.1%, and the reoperation rate was 0.9%.On multivariate analysis, perioperative blood transfusion (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 30.2), bronchopulmonary dysplasia/chronic lung disease (aOR 2.2), and prolonged length of stay (LOS) (aOR 1.1) were significantly associated with an adverse event.When subdivided by type of adverse event, reoperation was associated with perioperative blood transfusion (aOR 286.5), cerebral palsy (aOR 11.3), and prolonged LOS (aOR 1.1). Thirty-day readmission was associated with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification class III (aOR 2.0) and IV (aOR 4.8), bronchopulmonary dysplasia/chronic lung disease (aOR 2.5), cerebral palsy (aOR 5.7), and prolonged LOS (aOR 1.1). Finally, wound dehiscence was significantly associated with perioperative blood transfusion only (aOR 8.2)., Conclusions: Although adverse events following cleft palate surgery are rare, systemic disease remains the greatest predictor for readmission and reoperation. Neurologic and pulmonary diseases are the greatest systemic risk factors. Intraoperative adverse events requiring blood transfusion are the greatest surgical risk factor for post-surgical complications.

Background: Posterior vault distraction (PVD) can rapidly expand calvarial volume in infancy. Limited data exist regarding its perioperative and postoperative safety profile. This study sought to investigate the patient profile, outcomes, and safety of PVD using a national pediatric database., Methods: Posterior vault distraction patients between 2012 and 2016 were isolated from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database. Patient background, perioperative outcomes, and risk factors were analyzed using chi-squared, t test analysis, and multivariate regression., Results: Ninety-four patients who underwent PVD were isolated with 67 ultimately meeting inclusion criteria for the study. The majority of patients undergoing PVD had limited other documented comorbidities. No patients required reoperation or 30-day readmission. There were no incidences of stroke, surgical site infection, or death. Subdividing outcomes by specialty, plastic surgeons performed PVD on significantly older patients than neurosurgeons (188 days vs 138 days, P = 0.008). Increasing age was associated with increasing operative time (P < 0.001). Furthermore, increasing age is associated with greater absolute transfusion requirements (P = 0.018) and higher, but not significant, risk of requiring any volume of blood transfusion (P = 0.105)., Conclusions: Posterior vault distraction is a safe procedure to rapidly expand calvarial volume in the setting of craniosynostosis. Increasing patient age is the strongest predictor for prolonged operative time and higher blood transfusion volumes.

Background: CT angiography (CTA) can be performed pre-operatively for perforator mapping in autologous breast reconstruction. The full impact of incidental CTA findings on breast reconstruction remains unclear., Methods: CTAs were reviewed for all patients who underwent imaging prior to autologous breast reconstruction at Yale New Haven Hospital from 2013-2018. CTA findings and all resulting follow-up imaging, treatment, and change in management were catalogued. Our findings were compared to other published reports in the literature to better categorize the impact of CTA findings on patient care., Results: Records from 341 patients were reviewed. One hundred fifty-four patients (45.2%) had incidental findings with 15.6% requiring further imaging or biopsy. Three patients (0.9%) underwent a change in management. One patient was diagnosed with metastatic disease prior to mastectomy. Another two patients required gynecologic procedures as a result of the CTA findings. Data was pooled with three other series in the literature for aggregate analysis of 959 operative planning CTAs. In total, incidental findings were present in 53.7% of patients. In the meta-analysis, 10.4% of patients required additional imaging or biopsy and 1.4% of screening CTAs impacted medical management., Conclusion: Pre-operative autologous breast reconstruction planning reveals incidental findings in approximately half of all imaging studies. In an analysis of nearly 1000 CTAs, patient care was impacted in 1.4% of cases. If imaging is obtained for planning purposes, the reconstructive microsurgeon should carefully review the full imaging report given its potential impact on patient care., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Corticosteroid use continues to rise nationally. Studies have evaluated the impact of chronic steroid use on surgical outcomes in smaller populations. This study investigated the impact of chronic steroid use on perioperative surgical outcomes in a surgical cohort of more than 5 million surgical patients, using a statistically rigorous methodology., Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database was queried 2008-2016 to evaluate chronic steroid use. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were compared, using χ 2 and t test analysis, and then repeated after propensity score matching. Finally, a double-adjustment logistic regression was utilized, yielding odds ratios to assess the effect of chronic steroids on perioperative outcomes within the matched population., Results: Between 2008 and 2016, a total of 5,244,588 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 181,901 (3.5%) were taking steroids for a minimum of 30 days before surgery. Patients on chronic steroids had significantly more comorbidities compared with the remaining population. After propensity score matching and double-adjusted logistic regression, chronic steroid use was found to be associated with increased surgical complications and poorer surgical outcomes. Chronic steroid use significantly increased a patient's risk of having a hospital stay longer than 30 days by 19%, risk of readmission within 30 days by 58%, risk of reoperation by 21%, and risk of death by 32%., Conclusion: After controlling for differences in comorbidities and demographics, patients on chronic steroids have significantly poorer perioperative outcomes. Chronic steroid use should be evaluated and, if possible, addressed before surgery, given their significant impact on surgical outcomes., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Two-stage implant breast reconstruction is the most commonly performed breast reconstruction procedure. Limited data exist regarding reconstruction complication rates examined by mastectomy indication., Methods: Patients who underwent two-stage implant breast reconstruction at Yale New Haven Hospital from 2011 to 2017 were included in the study. Perioperative complications were compared. Chi-square analysis, t tests, and Fisher's exact tests were used to determine significant associations. A binary logistic regression was used to determine variables with a significant impact on the likelihood of mastectomy flap necrosis., Results: Between 2011 and 2017, complete perioperative records were available for 141 patients who underwent 226 mastectomies followed by two-stage tissue expander/permanent implant reconstruction. Of the 226 mastectomies, 134 were therapeutic and 92 were prophylactic. On regression analysis, there were no significant differences in demographics, comorbidities, or mastectomy and reconstructive details between the two breast groups except for there being more modified radical mastectomies in therapeutic breasts (p = 0.003). When comparing complications, there was a significantly higher risk of mastectomy flap necrosis in the therapeutic group (p = 0.017). Therapeutic mastectomies had a 9.5 times higher risk of mastectomy flap necrosis than prophylactic mastectomies when adjusted for confounding variables. There were no significant differences in other reconstructive complications between the two groups., Conclusions: Patients undergoing therapeutic mastectomies have a significantly higher risk of mastectomy flap necrosis than those undergoing prophylactic mastectomies. Although the underlying cause still needs to be determined, differences in technique may be related to mastectomy flap necrosis., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Risk, II.

Background: Two-stage tissue expander (TE)/permanent implant (PI) breast reconstruction remains the most commonly performed technique in breast reconstruction. Predictions for the PI size preoperatively impact on the number and range of implants made available at TE exchange. This study aims to identify critical preoperative variables and create a predictive model for PI size., Methods: Patients who underwent 2-stage implant breast reconstruction from 2011 to 2017 were included in the study. Linear and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify significant preoperative variables for PI volume., Results: During the study period, 826 patients underwent 2-stage TE/PI breast reconstruction. Complete records were available for 226 breasts. Initial TE fill ranged from 0% to 102% with a mean final fill of 100.6% of TE volume. The majority of PIs were smooth round (98.2%), silicone (90%) implants. In a multivariate analysis, significant variables for predicting PI size were TE final fill volume ( P < 0.0001), TE size ( P = 0.03), and a history of preoperative radiation ( P = 0.001). Relationships between these 3 variables were utilized to form a predictive model with a regression coefficient of R 2 = 0.914., Conclusions: Significant variables for predicting PI volume were TE final fill volume, TE size, and a history of preoperative radiation. The ability to more accurately predict the PI volume can improve surgical planning, reduce consignment inventory, and simplify operating room workflow.