Search

Background: Lung transplantation in patients older than 65 years is increasingly common, but questions remain regarding risk vs benefit and procedure choice. We identified short-term and long-term outcomes in older single-lung transplant (SLT) and bilateral-lung transplant (BLT) recipients., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of United Network for Organ Sharing data for patients who underwent lung transplantation between May 2005 and December 2012. Patients were grouped by age, and we calculated short-term and long-term survival rates and compared survival distributions., Results: Of the 11,776 patients who received lung transplants, 9,317 (79%) were aged 12 to 64 years, 1,902 (16%) were 65 to 69, 486 (4%) were 70 to 74, and 71 (1%) were 75 to 79. Short-term survival was similar across all age groups and procedure types except those aged 75 to 79, who had lower short-term survival for BLT. Those aged 12 to 64 had higher 5-year survival for SLT and BLT than all other groups (p < 0.001), and BLT offered a long-term survival advantage over SLT in this group (p < 0.0001). Older age groups trended toward better long-term survival for BLT compared with SLT (65 to 69, p = 0.059; 70 to 74, p = 0.079). Although data were lacking for 5-year survival for those aged 75 to 79, the 3-year survival for BLT in this group was inferior., Conclusions: Lung transplant can be offered to select older patients up to age 74 with acceptable outcomes. SLT may be preferred for elderly patients, but BLT offers acceptable long-term outcomes without significant short-term risk. Patients older than 75 have acceptable short-term outcomes for SLT, but long-term outcomes for SLT and BLT in this group are poor., (Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)