51. A Review of Phosphorus Removal Structures: How to Assess and Compare Their Performance
- Author
-
Aleksandar Klimeski, Isis Chagas, Chad J. Penn, and Gry Lyngsie
- Subjects
lcsh:Hydraulic engineering ,Phosphorus removal structures ,Geography, Planning and Development ,Phosphorus removal ,Inflow ,phosphorus sorption materials ,010501 environmental sciences ,Aquatic Science ,01 natural sciences ,Biochemistry ,water quality ,best management practices ,lcsh:Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes ,Urban stormwater ,lcsh:TC1-978 ,legacy phosphorus ,Drainage ,phosphorus ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Water Science and Technology ,lcsh:TD201-500 ,phosphorus removal ,Chemistry ,Phosphorus sorption materials ,Environmental engineering ,Phosphorus ,Sorption ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,Water quality ,Water body ,Wastewater ,urban stormwater ,Environmental chemistry ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,phosphorus removal structures ,Best management practices ,Legacy phosphorus ,Retention time - Abstract
Controlling dissolved phosphorus (P) losses to surface waters is challenging as most conservation practices are only effective at preventing particulate P losses. As a result, P removal structures were developed to filter dissolved P from drainage water before reaching a water body. While many P removal structures with different P sorption materials (PSMs) have been constructed over the past two decades, there remains a need to evaluate their performances and compare on a normalized basis. The purpose of this review was to compile performance data of pilot and field-scale P removal structures and present techniques for normalization and comparison. Over 40 studies were normalized by expressing cumulative P removal as a function of cumulative P loading to the contained PSM. Results were further analyzed as a function of retention time (RT), inflow P concentration, and type of PSM. Structures treating wastewater were generally more efficient than non-point drainage water due to higher RT and inflow P concentrations. For Ca-rich PSMs, including slag, increased RT allowed for greater P removal. Among structures with low RT and inflow P concentrations common to non-point drainage, Fe-based materials had an overall higher cumulative removal efficiency compared to non-slag and slag materials.
- Published
- 2017