Search

Background: Vaccination coverages need to be constantly maintained and improved with the implementation of vaccination strategies. This paper describes the development of an evidence-based tool to guide their planning and evaluation. Methods: A scoping review was performed in MEDLINE and institutional websites to search for similar available tools. A first version of the tool was developed considering review results and a four-step method used for the control and continuous improvement of processes and products, namely the Deming cycle. A panel of eight experts was then involved in a Delphi study for the finalization of the tool that was eventually discussed in a face-to-face meeting. Results: The scoping review found only one document and the first version of the tool was composed of 30 items. After the Delphi first round, 11 additional items were suggested and 5 original items amended. After the Delphi second round 41 items were eventually included. During the face-to-face meeting, 7 items were recognized as requisites for setting vaccination strategies, whereas 17 as relevant ones. Conclusions: Current public health challenges impose the need for evidence-based tools to organize effective vaccination strategies. Our tool is a first proposal which aims to reflect this focus., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Calabrò, Carini, Tognetto, Mancinelli, Sarnari, Colamesta, Ricciardi, de Waure and The BRAVE Project Expert panel.)

A Surgical Suite (SS) is a complex system in which different healthcare professionals work. Inefficient management could lead to waste of money and time and reduce quality of care. The aim of the study was to carry out an organizational assessment of a SS in northern Italy, in order to identify weaknesses and inadequacies related to its performance and promote strategies to increase efficiency. The study was conducted by process mapping of the working context, qualitative and quantitative analysis of patient documents and an evaluation of the critical issues using the root cause analysis (RCA) tool. The Plan Do Check Act (PDCA) method was used to implement the necessary changes. A detailed description of the staff involved, medical devices available, organization and timing of the SS was performed. Inefficiencies in the unit were caused mainly by insufficient medical devices and underusage of the radiological software Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Root causes of inefficiencies were identified and classified into four areas: organization/structure, personnel, technologies and methods. In particular, critical issues were identified in: the planning processes, the heterogeneity of technical and Information technology skills and educational background of nursing staff, the presence of several computerized information systems and lack of a connection interface between the different software, the lack of internal procedures and paths and lack of continuing professional education opportunities. Two multidisciplinary working tables were launched by the hospital management in order to identify improvement strategies. The evaluation allowed us to define the root causes of SS inefficiency in this hospital, leading to a reorganization with a view to continuous improvement. An innovative aspect of the present study was the use of RCA to perform an organizational assessment in healthcare, rather than as a reactive risk management tool.