Search

Aggressive breast cancer is an invasive form with G3, G4 differentiation degree, the absence of receptors for estrogen and progesterone and the absence or presence of HER2 (+ or 3+) gene. The final diagnosis is established by cumulating the clinical, paraclinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical diagnosis. Material and method: 84 out of 268 aggressive breast cancer cases were presented in the study, which were operated in October 2011-September 2013. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are exposed in the study lot and the treatment schemes. Results: For the study lot (lot A made up of 36 cases, lot B made up of 41 cases, lot C made up of 7 cases) the distribution was presented on age groups, histopathological and immunohistochemical classification, etiologic factors, type of surgery, postoperative staging and complications. Conclusions: The treatment of aggressive breast cancer depends on the level of the aggressiveness of the disease, the biologic status and the age that imposes the order of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgical treatment and target therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aggressive breast cancer is an invasive form with a differentiation degree G3/G4, the absence of estrogen receptor and progesterone and the absence or presence of the gene HER 2(+ or 3+). The immunohistochemical tests have an important role in establishing the diagnosis and the therapy. Material and method: It was shown that the aggressive breast cancers, 97 out of 316 cases were operated in the period October 2011 - February 2014. The criteria of inclusion/ exclusion in the study groups and the treatment schemes were exposed. Results: For the study group (group A=43/ group B=45/ group C=9 cases), the distribution according to the age group and immunohistochemical classification, were shown and, histologically, the type of surgical intervention, postoperative staging, postoperative complications were highlighted. Conclusions: The treatment of the aggressive forms of breast cancer, neoadjuvant and adjuvant can both be set only by IHC tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A supersymmetric integral theorem that extends results of Parisi, Sourlas, Efetov, Wegner, and others is rigorously proved. In particular, arbitrary generators are allowed in the integrand (instead of canonical ones) and the invariance condition is very much relaxed. The connection with Cauchy’s integral formula is made transparent. In passing, the unitary Lie supergroup is studied by using elementary methods. Applications in the theory of disordered systems are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Let B1 be the Borel transform of f, f(0)≠0. By means of an integral equation similar to that proposed by ’t Hooft [The Whys of Subnuclear Physics, edited by A. Zichichi (Plenum, New York, 1979)] an explicit representation of the Borel transform B2 of 1/f as a series in convolution powers of B1 and its derivative is given. It is proved that the singularities of B1, B2 on the circle of convergence coincide and have the same strength when approaching these singularities on a path inside their common analyticity domain, but possibly outside the circle of convergence of their power series representation (Borel circle). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]