Search

Unblinded interim analyses in clinical trials with adaptive designs are gaining increasing popularity. Here, the type I error rate is controlled by defining an appropriate conditional error function. Since various approaches to the selection of the conditional error function exist, the question of an optimal choice arises. In this article, we extend existing work on optimal conditional error functions by two results. Firstly, we prove that techniques from variational calculus can be applied to derive existing optimal conditional error functions. Secondly, we answer the question of optimizing the conditional error function of an optimal promising zone design and investigate the efficiency gain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Valid measurement of drug use in patients enrolled in clinical trials that treat substance use disorder is vital to determine the trial's outcome. Self-reports are often used but their validity has been studied with mixed results. Urinalysis may sometimes be employed as an alternative or supplement to self-reports. Objectives: This study examined how estimating drug use by either method would affect the results from a randomized clinical trial conducted in a methadone treatment program. At the initial Baseline interview and four follow-up interviews, participants were asked about their drug use history and provided a urine specimen for drug testing. Results: In most cases, the urinalyses detected more drugs than the patients had reported using. A major exception was heroin, whose use was an eligibility criterion for enrollment in the study and methadone treatment. Conclusions: The patients' self-reports would have led us to conclude that the use of heroin and fentanyl had declined from the initial Baseline interview to the final follow-up interview, while the urinalysis results indicated no change in exposure to heroin and an increase in exposure to fentanyl. Clinical trials would be well served to employ the use of biological tests in addition to self-reports to measure recent drug use and to accurately estimate the efficacy of the experimental protocols and patients' exposure to drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The hemagglutinating virus of Japan envelope (HVJ-E) is an inactivated Sendai virus particle with antitumor effect and inducing antitumor immunity. However, its dosage and efficacy have not been verified. We conducted a phase I clinical study on chemotherapy-resistant malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) aiming to determine the recommended dosage for a phase II study through dose-limiting toxicity and evaluate HVJ-E's preliminary efficacy. HVJ-E was administered intratumorally and subcutaneously to the patients with chemotherapy-resistant MPM. While no serious adverse events occurred, known adverse events of HVJ-E were observed. In the preliminary antitumor efficacy using modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria, three low-dose patients exhibited progressive disease, while all high-dose patients achieved stable disease, yielding disease control rates (DCRs) of 0% and 100%, respectively. Furthermore, the dose-dependent effect of HVJ-E revealed on DCR modified by RECIST and the baseline changes in target lesion size (by CT and SUL-peak; p < 0.05). Comparing targeted lesions receiving intratumoral HVJ-E with non-injected ones, while no clear difference existed at the end of the study, follow-up cases suggested stronger antitumor effects with intratumoral administration. Our findings suggest that HVJ-E could be safely administered to patients with chemotherapy-resistant MPM at both study doses. HVJ-E exhibited some antitumor activity against chemotherapy-resistant MPM, and higher doses tended to have stronger antitumor effects than lower doses. Consequently, a phase II clinical trial with higher HVJ-E doses has been conducted for MPM treatment. Trial registration number: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (#UMIN000019345). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In plaque psoriasis, palmoplantar areas are more difficult to treat. Evaluate the safety and efficacy of risankizumab (RZB) versus placebo (PBO) for the treatment of palmoplantar psoriasis. Patients were randomized to RZB or PBO for 16 weeks followed by RZB through week 52. The primary and secondary end points were achievement of palmoplantar Investigator's Global Assessment of "clear" or "almost clear" with ≥2-point reduction from baseline (ppIGA 0/1), achievement of ≥75%, ≥90%, and 100% improvement in Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PPASI 75, PPASI 90, PPASI 100) and achievement of static Physician Global Assessment of "clear" or "almost clear" with ≥2-point reduction from baseline (sPGA 0/1) at week 16. Safety was based on treatment-emergent adverse events. RZB demonstrated significant efficacy compared to PBO at week 16 in the patients achieving ppIGA 0/1 (33.3% vs 16.1% [ P =.006]), PPASI 75 (42.5% vs 14.9% [ P <.001]), PPASI 90 (27.6% vs 5.7% [ P <.001]), sPGA 0/1 (32.2% vs 11.5% [ P <.001]), and PPASI 100 (17.2% vs 1.1% [ P <.001]). Results improved through week 52 with no new safety signals. No biologic comparator. RZB demonstrated good tolerance and efficacy in palmoplantar psoriasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Response‐adaptive randomization (RAR) procedures have been extensively studied in the literature, but most of the procedures rely on updating the randomization after each response, which is impractical in many clinical trials. In this article, we propose a new family of RAR procedures that dynamically update based on the responses of a group of individuals, either when available or at fixed time intervals (weekly or biweekly). We show that the proposed design retains the essential theoretical properties of Hu and Zhang's doubly adaptive biased coin designs (DBCD), and performs well in scenarios involving delayed and randomly missing responses. Numerical studies have been conducted to demonstrate that the new proposed group doubly adaptive biased coin design has similar properties to the Hu and Zhang's DBCDs in different situations. We also apply the new design to a real clinical trial, highlighting its advantages and practicality. Our findings open the door to studying the properties of other group response adaptive designs, such as urn models, and facilitate the application of response‐adaptive randomized clinical trials in practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A 12-week randomized controlled trial demonstrated that brexpiprazole is efficacious for treating agitation in patients with dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. Objective: To assess the long-term safety and tolerability of brexpiprazole for the treatment of agitation associated with dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. Methods: This 12-week, active-treatment (oral brexpiprazole 2 or 3 mg/day) extension trial ran from October 2018–September 2022 at 66 sites in Europe/US. Patients with agitation in dementia due to Alzheimer's disease in a care facility/community-based setting who completed the randomized trial were eligible (N = 259 enrolled/analyzed for safety; 88.4% completed). Stable Alzheimer's disease medications were permitted. The primary safety endpoint was the frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Change in Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) total score was an exploratory efficacy endpoint. Results: Mean (SD) age was 74.3 (7.6) years, 145 patients (56.0%) were female, and 248 (95.8%) were White. TEAEs were reported by 67 patients (25.9%), most commonly headache (3.5%) and fall (2.3%). Most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity; 5 patients (1.9%) reported a severe TEAE, including 3 severe falls attributed to tripping, misjudging sitting, or dehydration. Twelve patients (4.6%) discontinued due to TEAEs. No patients died. Mean CMAI total score improved by 9.1 points over 12 weeks. Conclusions: Considering the randomized and extension trials together, brexpiprazole 2 or 3 mg was generally well tolerated for up to 24 weeks in elderly patients with agitation associated with dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. Patients showed continued improvement in agitation. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03594123 (registration date: July 11, 2018). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acute mountain sickness (AMS) is a debilitating condition that individuals may develop on ascent to high altitude. It is characterized by headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and fatigue with the potential to progress to fatal disease. Although the pathophysiology of AMS remains unclear, proposed mechanisms are hypothesized to be similar to migraine. Prochlorperazine, a first-line treatment for acute migraine, has been shown to abort migraine early and thus may be effective in preventing AMS. Its action as a respiratory stimulant additionally makes it a promising novel agent for AMS prevention. Methods: In this randomized double-blinded trial, participants will be randomized to receive oral prochlorperazine maleate or placebo for 24 h of three times daily dosing on a rapid ascent to 4348 m. Participants will be adults, aged 18, and older who are unacclimatized. Participants will remain at this elevation overnight. The Lake Louise Questionnaire will be utilized to define the primary outcome and presence of AMS and will be assessed the evening of and morning after ascent to peak altitude. Discussion: Currently, acetazolamide is the preferred option for the chemoprophylaxis of AMS, which has been studied and utilized since the 1970s and involves potential prohibitive side effects. Other more efficacious options with more tolerable side effects are needed. Preventing AMS has the potential to limit both the morbidity and mortality associated with developing AMS and more serious diseases (notably high-altitude cerebral edema). Additionally, there is a substantial economic and environmental impact of AMS that could be prevented. Trial registration: Clinicaltrial.gov, NCT06450899. Registered on June 2024. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recruiting a sufficient number of patients is often a challenge for conducting clinical trials. Published data reveal that only 10% of eligible patients according to inclusion and exclusion criteria are enrolled in clinical trials. Consequentially, identifying barriers and facilitators may improve enrollment. These factors may differ in the pediatric population, for example, due to the involvement of parents in the decision-making process. We aimed to conduct an overview of systematic reviews to summarize the barriers and facilitators influencing the enrollment of pediatric participants in clinical trials. Methods: A systematic literature search in PubMed and Epistemonikos of published systematic reviews focusing on barriers and facilitators influencing the enrollment of pediatric patients in clinical trials was conducted. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by two authors independently. The methodological quality was judged using a critical appraisal tool. Finally, data were narratively synthesized. Results: Of 283 identified systematic reviews, four met the inclusion criteria and were included in the overview. Parents belonging to an ethnic minority or having low socioeconomic status were identified as barriers to enrollment whereas higher parental education and higher age served as facilitators. Additionally, existing expectations, previous treatment experiences and preferences, study duration, type of control group, and the child's attitude toward study participation could favor or hinder participation. Furthermore, physicians' opinions of study-related treatments may also influence the enrollment process. Conclusion: This overview provides a summary of barriers and facilitators to the enrollment of pediatric patients in clinical trials. Taking into account this information may enhance the enrollment of this hard-to-reach population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Consensus on what outcomes should be included in trials of psychological therapies on acute psychiatric inpatient wards is currently lacking. Inclusion of different viewpoints, including service user perspectives, is crucial in ensuring that future trials measure outcomes which are meaningful and important. Development of a Core Outcome Set (COS), a minimum standardised set of outcomes to be measured and reported, would help improve synthesis and interpretation of clinical trial data in this area. Methods: Stage 1 of the COS development involved compiling a comprehensive long-list of outcomes from key sources including i) a systematic review of outcomes from published trials, ii) online survey of key stakeholders (service users, carers, healthcare professionals, researchers, and end users of research), iii) qualitative interviews with service users and carers. Stage 2 involved stakeholder groups short-listing the outcomes using consensus methods (e-Delphi survey). The final outcome set was derived from the short-list at a consensus meeting of stakeholders, facilitated by an Independent Chair. Results: A long-list of 68 outcomes was compiled from the systematic review (n = 30 trials), online stakeholder survey (n = 100 participants) and qualitative interviews (n = 15 participants). Fifty stakeholders took part in the e-Delphi study, where the long-list was cut down to a short-list of 12 outcomes over 2 rounds. Nine stakeholders took part in the final consensus meeting, and after some outcomes were removed and/or amalgamated, a final set of 6 outcomes was recommended for inclusion in the COS. These were Ability to Cope, Hopefulness, Quality of Life, Psychosis Symptoms, Mood, and Self-Harm Behaviours. Conclusions: Widespread future adoption of the COS will reduce research waste by ensuring that outcomes are more easily comparable across trials, and that the full range of stakeholder priorities are represented in trial outcomes. This makes it more likely that effective therapies will be identified in a timely fashion and successfully implemented in routine clinical practice. The final 6-outcome COS should be feasible to implement given the need keep participant burden to a minimum in inpatient trials. Further work is needed to make recommendations for the best outcome measurement instruments to use, including the use of patient-reported outcomes alongside clinician-rated measures. Trial registration: Not applicable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose Methods Results Conclusions X‐linked Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth disease type 1 (CMTX1) ranks as the second most prevalent hereditary neuropathy and, currently, has no definitive cure. Emerging preclinical trials offer hope for potential clinical studies in the near future. While it is widely accepted that experimental groups in these trials should be balanced for age and gender, there is a current shortfall in data regarding phenotype–genotype correlations. Our aim was to provide a more detailed understanding of these correlations to facilitate the formation of well‐matched patient groups in upcoming clinical trials.We conducted a retrospective evaluation of CMTX1 patients from 13 designated reference centers in France. Data on genetics, clinical features, and nerve conduction were systematically gathered.We analyzed the genotype–phenotype correlations in 275 CMTX1 patients belonging to 162 families and carrying 87 distinct variants. Patients with variants affecting the transmembrane domains demonstrated significantly greater severity, as evidenced by a Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth Examination Score of 10.5, compared to 7.1 for those with intracellular domain variants and 8.7 for extracellular domain variants (p < 0.000). These patients also experienced an earlier age of onset, showed slower ulnar nerve conduction velocities and had more substantial loss of motor amplitude.This study confirms the presence of a correlation between the mutated protein domain and the clinical phenotype. Patients with a variant in the transmembrane domains demonstrated a more severe clinical and electrophysiological profile. Consequently, the genotype could play a prognostic role in addition to its diagnostic role, and it will be essential to consider this in future clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Methods and results Conclusion Beta‐blockers may inhibit neprilysin activity and conversely, neprilysin inhibition may have a sympatho‐inhibitory action. Consequently, sacubitril/valsartan may have a greater effect in patients not receiving a beta‐blocker compared to those treated with a beta‐blocker.We examined the effect of sacubitril/valsartan compared to enalapril on outcomes according to background beta‐blocker treatment in the 8399 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction enrolled in PARADIGM‐HF. The primary outcome was time to first heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death. Compared to the 7811 patients taking a beta‐blocker, the 588 patients not receiving a beta‐blocker were older, more frequently female, but had a similar mean left ventricular ejection fraction and New York Heart Association class distribution, with little difference in N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide. Patients not taking beta‐blockers had a higher rate of the primary endpoint than those taking beta‐blockers. The benefit of sacubitril/valsartan on the primary endpoint was evident in both the no beta‐blocker subgroup (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45–0.82) and the beta‐blocker subgroup (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75–0.90; p‐interaction = 0.06). The respective HRs for cardiovascular death were 0.47 (95% CI 0.32–0.69) versus 0.84 (95% CI 0.75–0.95; p‐interaction <0.01) and for HF hospitalization 0.76 (95% CI 0.51–1.12) versus 0.80 (95% CI 0.71–0.90; p‐interaction = 0.73). For all‐cause death, the HR in the no beta‐blocker group was 0.50 (95% CI 0.36–0.71) compared to 0.89 (95% CI 0.80–0.99) in the beta‐blocker group (p‐interaction <0.01). Safety outcomes related to sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril did not differ according to background beta‐blocker use.Sacubitril/valsartan may be more effective than enalapril in reducing the risk of death in patients not treated with a beta‐blocker compared to those treated with a beta‐blocker, but is effective regardless of beta‐blocker use.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01035255. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The meta-analysis study examines the association between glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) receptor agonists and the risk of ischemic optic neuropathy. The study includes data from randomized controlled trials on GLP1 receptor agonists approved for obesity and type 2 diabetes. Results show no significant difference in the risk of optic ischemic neuropathy between GLP1-RA therapy and control groups. The study suggests that while rare, the potential risk increase of optic neuropathy should be further investigated, especially for semaglutide. [Extracted from the article]

The win ratio method for analysing a composite clinical hierarchy of outcomes is growing in popularity especially in cardiovascular trials. This article gives a perspective on its use so far and the issues derived from that experience. Specifically, it focuses on the limitations of a conventional composite outcome; how does the win ratio work, what does it mean, and how to display its findings; guidance on choosing an appropriate clinical hierarchy of outcomes including clinical events, quantitative outcomes, and other options; the additional value of the win difference as a measure of absolute benefit: extension to stratified win ratio, subgroup analysis, matched win ratio, and covariate adjustment; determining trial size for a win ratio outcome; specific insights such as adaptive designs, use of repeat events, and use of margins and time averages for quantitative outcomes; a critique of potential misuses; availability of statistical software; and a statistical appendix on the methodological details. Throughout, each principle is illustrated by examples from specific cardiology trials. The article concludes with a set of recommendations for future use of the win ratio. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Conformal proctectomy with sphincter preservation (CPSP) is designed to preserve the rectal wall as much as possible in very low rectal cancer patients. Evaluations of anal function and quality of life outcomes are lacking. Methods: This study included male patients with very low (≤ 5 cm from the anal verge) rectal adenocarcinoma between January 1, 2020, and January 1, 2022. A LARS score questionnaire survey and EORTC-QLQ-CR38 questionnaire survey were administered. Results: A total of 21 very low rectal cancer patients were enrolled in follow-up. The average age of the patients was 56.7 years, the tumors were 1.9 ± 0.6 cm in size, and the distance from the anal verge was 4.8 ± 0.5 cm. All patients were followed up, and the mean follow-up period was 2.7 ± 0.5 years. The LARS score increased significantly from 4.1 ± 2.8 before surgery to 19.1 ± 6.0 at the 1st year after surgery (P < 0.001) and then decreased to 13.1 ± 4.2 (P < 0.001) at the 2nd year. The quality of life of patients was also lower at the 1st year after surgery (61.1 ± 9.6 vs. 74.2 ± 11.2, P < 0.001) and was restored at the 2nd year after surgery (80.6 ± 11.9 vs. 74.2 ± 11.2, P = 0.029). During standard follow-up at the outpatient department, no rectal tumor relapse was confirmed in these patients, although 2 patients were found to have suspected recurrence of local lymph node metastasis. Conclusions: These results suggest that the CPSP technique preserves acceptable defecation function and is a safe and feasible option for male patients with very low rectal cancer. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ , identifier ChiCTR2100052094. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an antiplatelet‐antibody‐mediated disorder with accelerated platelet clearance and decreased platelet production. Rozanolixizumab, a monoclonal IgG4 anti‐FcRn antibody, blocks IgG recycling and decreases IgG levels. We report efficacy and safety of rozanolixizumab in adults with persistent/chronic ITP in 24‐week phase 3 studies (TP0003; TP0006), and their 52‐week open‐label extension (OLE). Primary end‐point was durable clinically meaningful platelet response (DCMPR) of ≥50 × 109/L for 8/12 weeks during Weeks 13–25 in the double‐blind studies. Operational delays and evolving ITP treatment landscape led the sponsor to terminate these studies early; thus, only 21 and 12 (TP0003) and 20 and 10 (TP0006) patients were randomised to rozanolixizumab or placebo. Forty‐three patients enrolled in the OLE: 42 started on every 2‐week dosing; 21 later switched to weekly dosing. More rozanolixizumab‐treated than placebo‐treated patients achieved DCMPR: 4/21 versus 0 (TP0003) and 1/20 versus 0 (TP0006). Platelet increases to ≥50 × 109/L were observed on Day 8 in 52.4% (TP0003; 2/12 placebo) and 45.0% (TP0006; 1/10 placebo) of rozanolixizumab‐treated patients. OLE platelet increases were maintained while on weekly dosing. The most frequent treatment‐emergent adverse events overall were headache, pyrexia and nausea, as seen previously. Weekly dosing appears more efficacious than every 2‐week dosing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chronic insomnia increases the risk of various health problems and mental illness. Existing research suggests promise for both transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treating chronic insomnia individually. However, the combined effects of tDCS and rTMS on this condition remain unclear. This study aimed to verify the efficacy and safety of tDCS combined with rTMS for the treatment of adult patients with chronic insomnia. Methods: This was a randomised double-blind parallel-group controlled study. Overall, 157 participants with chronic insomnia were randomly assigned to one of three neurotherapy regimens: tDCS + rTMS, sham tDCS + rTMS, or tDCS + sham rTMS. All groups received 20 treatment sessions over 4 consecutive weeks. The primary outcome was the change in patients' sleep as assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months of follow-up. The secondary outcome was the assessment of different dimensions of depression and anxiety in patients through the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), as well as the occurrence of adverse events. Results: Throughout the intervention and after the 3-month follow-up, the tDCS + rTMS group had significantly reduced total PSQI scores compared with the other two groups [tDCS + rTMS, 9.21 vs. sham tDCS + rTMS, 10.03; difference − 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), − 1.82 to − 0.38; p = 0.003; tDCS + rTMS, 9.21 vs. tDCS + sham rTMS, 10.76; difference − 2.14; 95% CI, − 2.90 to − 1.38; p < 0.001; sham tDCS + rTMS, 10.03 vs. tDCS + sham rTMS, 10.76; difference − 1.04; 95% CI, − 1.82 to − 0.26; p = 0.010), indicating improved overall sleep quality. Total HAMD and insomnia factor scores were significantly lower in the tDCS + rTMS group than in the other two groups after treatment (p < 0.05). Notably, no adverse events or serious adverse reactions were observed during the study period. Conclusions: Combining tDCS with rTMS effectively relieved insomnia symptoms, achieving a significant therapeutic effect after 2-week of intervention, and demonstrating the persistence of treatment effects in later follow-up, emphasising the advantages of combination therapy in improving treatment stability and long-term benefits, reflecting the rapid and effective augmentation of combination therapy. This combined therapy may serve as a safe and effective treatment for adults with chronic insomnia. Trial registration: This study was registered as a clinical trial with the China Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR2100052681). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Results from randomized control trials (RCTs) may not be representative when individuals refuse to be randomized or are excluded for having a preference for which treatment they receive. If trial designs do not allow for participant treatment preferences, trials can suffer in accrual, adherence, retention, and external validity of results. Thus, there is interest surrounding clinical trial designs that incorporate participant treatment preferences. We propose a Partially Randomized, Patient Preference, Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (PRPP‐SMART) which combines a Partially Randomized, Patient Preference (PRPP) design with a Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (SMART) design. This novel PRPP‐SMART design is a multi‐stage clinical trial design where, at each stage, participants either receive their preferred treatment, or if they do not have a preferred treatment, they are randomized. This paper focuses on the clinical trial design for PRPP‐SMARTs and the development of Bayesian and frequentist weighted and replicated regression models (WRRMs) to analyze data from such trials. We propose a two‐stage PRPP‐SMART with binary end of stage outcomes and estimate the embedded dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs). Our WRRMs use data from both randomized and non‐randomized participants for efficient estimation of the DTR effects. We compare our method to a more traditional PRPP analysis which only considers participants randomized to treatment. Our Bayesian and frequentist methods produce more efficient DTR estimates with negligible bias despite the inclusion of non‐randomized participants in the analysis. The proposed PRPP‐SMART design and analytic method is a promising approach to incorporate participant treatment preferences into clinical trial design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The impacts of biological sex on cancer treatment outcomes are understudied, but differences in immune-related adverse events and oncologic outcomes have been associated with biological sex for patients with melanoma receiving checkpoint blockade therapy. In a recent trial, we also identified a difference in clinical outcomes between biological female and male patients with metastatic melanoma who received an experimental melanoma vaccine. Here, we examine whether treatment-related adverse events with the vaccine differ by biological sex. Background/Objective: Biological females experience more autoimmune disease than males and more treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) after immune checkpoint blockade therapy. However, little is known about sex-related differences in TRAEs after cancer vaccines. Methods: The Mel44 clinical trial (NCT00118274) enrolled 167 eligible patients with high-risk melanoma to treatment with either of two melanoma multipeptide vaccines. We hypothesized that females would experience higher rates and grades of TRAEs. TRAE rates and grades were compared between sexes, with adjustment for multiple comparisons, and with mixed-effects models. Results: Multiple sex-related differences in TRAE rate and grade were observed in unadjusted comparisons, but only hyperglycemia and hypopigmentation were significantly higher-grade by sex after correcting for multiple comparisons: they were increased in males. In mixed-effect models, vaccination strategy, but not patient sex, was independently associated with TRAE rates and grades. Conclusions: These data do not support our hypothesis that TRAEs would be increased in females. Vaccine safety was supported for both males and females. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Cellular immunotherapy represents a rapidly advancing field in cancer treatment, particularly for multiple myeloma (MM). Notably, two approved chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) have demonstrated substantial clinical efficacy, offering renewed hope for patients with this hitherto incurable disease. However, achieving sustained remission across a wider patient population remains challenging. This review examines the landscape of current clinical trials in MM cellular immunotherapy, highlighting key challenges and opportunities. It also explores recent innovations aimed at overcoming existing barriers, including broadening the spectrum of used cell types, optimizing manufacturing processes and targeting novel antigens. Together, these strategies could improve clinical outcomes, paving the way to push immunotherapy to earlier lines of MM treatment. Multiple myeloma (MM) treatment remains challenging due to its relapsed/refractory disease course as well as intra- and inter-patient heterogeneity. Cellular immunotherapies, especially chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), mark a major breakthrough, achieving long-lasting remissions and instilling hope for a potential cure. While ongoing clinical trials are increasingly driving approved cellular products towards earlier lines of therapy, novel targets as well as advanced approaches employing natural killer (NK) cells or dendritic cell (DC) vaccines are currently under investigation. Treatment resistance, driven by tumor-intrinsic factors such as antigen escape and the intricate dynamics of the tumor microenvironment (TME), along with emerging side effects such as movement and neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events (MNTs), are the major limitations of approved cellular therapies. To improve efficacy and overcome resistance, cutting-edge research is exploring strategies to target the microenvironment as well as synergistic combinatorial approaches. Recent advances in CAR-T cell production involve shortened manufacturing protocols and "off-the-shelf" CAR-T cells, aiming at decreasing socioeconomic barriers and thereby increasing patient access to this potential lifesaving therapy. In this review, we provide an extensive overview of the evolving field of cellular therapies for MM, underlining the potential to achieve long-lasting responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a common and often fatal cancer type. Despite recent progress in our understanding of DLBCL biology, the translation of this knowledge into clinical initiatives has lagged, and the first-line treatment for this tumor type, the immunochemotherapy R-CHOP, has been the same for more than two decades. We previously identified the cyclic-AMP/phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) axis as a critical modulator of B-cell receptor (BCR) signals and PI3K activity in DLBCL. Pre-clinically and clinically, we confirmed that PDE4 inhibition suppressed PI3K activity, and downstream to it, angiogenesis in the lymphoma microenvironment. Here, we report on a phase 1 clinical trial that combines the PDE4 inhibitor roflumilast with R-CHOP in treatment-naïve DLBCL patients. We show that this combination is safe, active, and inhibits PI3K activity and VEGF-A levels. Further, we preliminarily identified the genetic subtypes of DLBCL that may be especially vulnerable to this new drug combination. Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a common and often fatal malignancy. The standard-of-care immunochemotherapy, R-CHOP, cures only about 60% of DLBCL patients. Improving this cure rate will likely require the effective translation of basic biology knowledge into clinical activities. We previously identified the cyclic-AMP/phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) axis as an important modulator of lymphomagenic processes. We also showed that the FDA-approved PDE4 inhibitor roflumilast can suppress B-cell receptor (BCR) signals, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) activity and angiogenesis. These data suggested that combining roflumilast with R-CHOP may be beneficial in DLBCL. Methods: We conducted a single-center, single-arm, open-label, phase 1 study of roflumilast in combination with the standard of care, R-CHOP (Ro+R-CHOP), in pathologically proven, treatment-naïve, high-risk DLBCL patients. Results: Ro+R-CHOP was safe, and at a median follow-up time of 44 months, 70% of patients were alive and disease free (median OS not reached, PFS 44% (95% CI, 21–92). In this pilot series, we found that the addition of roflumilast suppressed PI3K activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and VEGF-A secretion in the urine. We also encountered preliminary evidence to suggest that the Ro+R-CHOP combination may be particularly beneficial to patients diagnosed with high-risk genetic subtypes of DLBCL, namely MCD and A53. Conclusions: These initial findings suggest that roflumilast may be an alternative agent able to inhibit BCR/PI3K activity and angiogenesis in DLBCL, and that the testing of Ro+R-CHOP in a larger series of genetically characterized tumors is warranted. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03458546. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder. It is characterized by the progressive loss of dopaminergic (DAnergic) neurons in the substantia nigra and decreased dopamine (DA) levels, which lead to both motor and non-motor symptoms. Conventional PD treatments aim to alleviate symptoms, but do not delay disease progression. PD gene therapy offers a promising approach to improving current treatments, with the potential to alleviate significant PD symptoms and cause fewer adverse effects than conventional therapies. DA replacement approaches and DA enzyme expression do not slow disease progression. However, DA replacement gene therapies, such as adeno-associated virus (AAV)–glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) and L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) gene therapies, which increase DA transmitter levels, have been demonstrated to be safe and efficient in early-phase clinical trials. Disease-modifying strategies, which aim to slow disease progression, appear to be potent. These include therapies targeting downstream pathways, neurotrophic factors, and midbrain DAnergic neuronal factors, all of which have shown potential in preclinical and clinical trials. These approaches focus on maintaining the integrity of DAnergic neurons, not just targeting the DA transmitter level itself. In particular, critical midbrain developmental and maintenance factors, such as Nurr1 and Foxa2, can interact synergistically with neighboring glia, in a paracrine mode of action, to protect DAnergic neurons against various toxic factors. Similar outcomes could be achieved by targeting both DAnergic neurons and glial cells with other candidate gene therapies, but in-depth research is needed. Neurotrophic factors, such as neurturin, the glial-cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), are also being investigated for their potential to support DAnergic neuron survival. Additionally, gene therapies targeting key downstream pathways, such as the autophagy–lysosome pathway, mitochondrial function, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, offer promising avenues. Gene editing and delivery techniques continue to evolve, presenting new opportunities to develop effective gene therapies for PD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The most important issues in acute myeloid leukemia are preventing relapse and treating relapse. Although the remission rate has improved to approximately 80%, the 5-year survival rate is only around 30%. The main reasons for this are the high relapse rate and the limited treatment options. In chronic myeloid leukemia patients, when a deep molecular response is achieved for a certain period of time through tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, about half of them will reach treatment-free remission, but relapse is still a problem. Therefore, potential therapeutic targets for myeloid leukemias are eagerly awaited. Autophagy suppresses the development of cancer by maintaining cellular homeostasis; however, it also promotes cancer progression by helping cancer cells survive under various metabolic stresses. In addition, autophagy is promoted or suppressed in cancer cells by various genetic mutations. Therefore, the development of therapies that target autophagy is also being actively researched in the field of leukemia. In this review, studies of the role of autophagy in hematopoiesis, leukemogenesis, and myeloid leukemias are presented, and the impact of autophagy regulation on leukemia treatment and the clinical trials of autophagy-related drugs to date is discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a disease that causes severe pain that can seriously affect the quality of life. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two different low-level laser therapies (LLLT) as alternatives to medical treatment to reduce pain and improve the quality of life in patients with TN. Methods: A total of 45 patients were randomly divided into 3 groups. In the first group, a new-generation diode laser (GRR laser) was applied at predetermined points in the trigeminal nerve line. In the second group, a low-level neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser was applied along the affected nerve line. The placebo group received the same protocol with a Nd:YAG laser without the device switched on. The scores were recorded pre- and post-treatment using the Brief Pain Inventory-Facial (BPI-facial) scale. Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the pre- and post-treatment values of all four variables in the GRR laser, Nd:YAG laser, and placebo groups. When the post-treatment values were compared, statistically significant differences were found between the groups in pain frequency, pain intensity, and interference in facial-specific activities, but no differences were found in general activities. Conclusions: Both LLLTs can be considered alternative treatment modalities for TN, but the GRR laser treatment was more effective than the Nd:YAG laser treatment in reducing pain and improving the quality of life in patients with TN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The CapaCiTY programme includes three, multi-centre, randomised controlled trials aiming to develop an evidence based adult chronic constipation treatment pathway. The trials were conducted in the United Kingdom, National Health Service, aiming to recruit 808 participants from 26 March 2015 to 31 January 2019. Sites were selected based on their responses to site feasibility questionnaires (2014–2015), a common tool employed by sponsors to assess a site's recruitment potential and ability to undertake the trial protocol. Failure to recruit the planned sample jeopardises reliability of results and wastes significant time and resources. The purpose of this study was to investigate barriers to recruitment in 2017. Methods: We conducted site feasibility assessments with thirty-nine sites prior to trial commencement. Twenty-seven were selected to participate in the CapaCiTY programme, twelve were deemed unsuitable. We compared site contracted recruitment rates with actual recruitment rates and conducted a telephone survey and analysis from 5 July to 7 December 2017 (n = 24) to understand barriers to recruitment. Three sites declined to participate in the survey. Results: At the time of survey, 15% of sites in the CapaCiTY programme were meeting recruitment targets, 85% were recruiting half or less of their target. Of these, 28% recruited no participants. The main barriers to recruitment were lack of resources, high workloads, lack of suitable participants and study design not being compatible with routine care. Despite multiple strategies employed to overcome these barriers, the trials were eventually stopped due to futility, recruiting only 34% of the programme sample size. Conclusions: Improving the reliability of site feasibility assessments could potentially save a substantial amount in failed research investments and speed up the time to delivery of new treatments. We recommend 1) investment in training researchers in conducting and completing site feasibility; 2) funders to require pilot and feasibility data in grant applications, with an emphasis on patient and public involvement in trial design; 3) conducting site feasibility assessment at the pre-award stage; 4) development of a national database of sites' previous trial recruitment performance; 5) data-driven site level assessment of recruitment potential. Trial registration: ISRCTN11791740; 16/07/2015, ISRCTN11093872; 11/11/2015, ISRCTN11747152; 30/09/2015. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ketogenic diet (KD) is an excess fat, enough protein, and minimal carbohydrate diet. The high fat content in KD lowers the oesophageal sphincter tone, slows gastric emptying, and decreases intestinal transit time. The primary aim of the current clinical trial was to study the effect of L-carnitine supplementation on gastric emptying in children with drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) on KD. Assessment of the protective effect of L-carnitine on bowel function and habits in those patients was a secondary aim. The current study recruited 30 patients aged 12 months to 18 years newly diagnosed with DRE assigned to start KD who were following up at the Pediatric Clinical Nutrition and Neurology Outpatient Clinics or were admitted due to DRE at the Pediatric Neurology Inpatient Department, Children's Hospital, Ain Shams University (Egypt). Participants were assigned randomly into 2 arms; arm I: received KD with L-carnitine supplementation, arm II: received KD only. Patients were assessed at baseline and after 3 months of starting KD, the assessments of children included: 24-hour dietary recall, Chalfont Seizures Severity Scale, gastrointestinal symptoms score and Bristol stool chart, frequency of defecation per week, anthropometric measurements assessment, fasting serum lipid profile and measurement of the antral length by ultrasound. There was significant increase in antral length in the patients who received KD with L-carnitine supplementation compared to the non-supplemented group. The antral length showed a significant negative correlation with GI symptoms score in all cases and the L-carnitine supplemented group. It also showed a significant positive correlation with Bristol stool score in all patients and a significant positive correlation with stool frequency in the L-carnitine supplemented group only. L-carnitine supplementation to children with DRE on KD has a significant role in improving gastric motility and it increases the frequency of defecation. Further studies are recommended to explore additional benefits, meanwhile it is prudent to advise L-carnitine supplementation for such patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Neoantigen vaccines can induce or enhance highly specific antitumor immune responses with minimal risk of autoimmunity. We have developed a neoantigen DNA vaccine platform capable of efficiently presenting both HLA class I and II epitopes and performed a phase 1 clinical trial in triple-negative breast cancer patients with persistent disease on surgical pathology following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a patient population at high risk of disease recurrence. Methods: Expressed somatic mutations were identified by tumor/normal exome sequencing and tumor RNA sequencing. The pVACtools software suite of neoantigen prediction algorithms was used to identify and prioritize cancer neoantigens and facilitate vaccine design for manufacture in an academic GMP facility. Neoantigen DNA vaccines were administered via electroporation in the adjuvant setting (i.e., following surgical removal of the primary tumor and completion of standard of care therapy). Vaccines were monitored for safety and immune responses via ELISpot, intracellular cytokine production via flow cytometry, and TCR sequencing. Results: Eighteen subjects received three doses of a neoantigen DNA vaccine encoding on average 11 neoantigens per patient (range 4–20). The vaccinations were well tolerated with relatively few adverse events. Neoantigen-specific T cell responses were induced in 14/18 patients as measured by ELISpot and flow cytometry. At a median follow-up of 36 months, recurrence-free survival was 87.5% (95% CI: 72.7–100%) in the cohort of vaccinated patients. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates neoantigen DNA vaccines are safe, feasible, and capable of inducing neoantigen-specific immune responses. Clinical trial registration number: NCT02348320. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundMethodsResultsConclusionEmerging evidence indicates that gut microbiota-targeted interventions may lead to improvements in cognition. We assessed whether a prebiotic-rich dietary intervention, probiotic supplement, or synbiotic combination of both would improve human cognition, as part of the ‘Gut Feelings’ trial.An 8-week, 2 × 2 factorial randomised controlled trial was conducted on 118 adults with low mood and potential for dietary improvement. Treatment arms: (1) probiotic supplement and diet-as-usual (probiotic group); (2) high-prebiotic diet and placebo supplement (prebiotic diet group); (3) probiotic supplement and high-prebiotic diet (synbiotic group); and (4) placebo supplement and diet-as-usual (placebo group). At baseline and 8-weeks, the Cogstate Brief Battery was administered, testing processing speed, attention, visual learning, and working memory. Data were analysed using Bayesian linear regression.We found weak evidence that the probiotic improved working memory (Cohen’s d = −0.32, 95% CI: –0.67, 0.03; posterior probability [post. prob] of benefit: 96%). For the other treatments, there was little or no evidence of cognitive improvement. We found weak evidence that the prebiotic diet impaired processing speed (d = 0.25, 95% CI: –0.02, 0.51; post. prob of harm: 97%). There was little indication of a synergistic interaction between the probiotic and prebiotic diet.We found suggestive evidence of a probiotic-induced improvement in working memory, and prebiotic-induced impairment in processing speed. However, the evidence remains inconclusive regarding any cognitive benefit or harm induced by the probiotic, prebiotic diet, or synbiotic treatments. Larger intervention studies are recommended, with inclusion of neuroimaging or electrophysiology measures.Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000795392; registered 31 May 2017). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objective: Optimal vitamin D levels are required for bone health and proper functionality of the nervous, musculoskeletal and immune systems. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety profiles of new weekly calcifediol formulations with the potential to improve adherence and outcome. Methods: A Phase II-III, double-blind, randomized, multicentre trial (EudraCT 2020-001099-14 and NCT04735926). Subjects were randomized 2:2:1 to calcifediol 75 µg, 100 µg and placebo. 25(OH)D levels were measured at 4, 16, 24, 32 and 52 weeks. The main outcome was the percentage of subjects who achieved a response defined as 25(OH)D levels ≥20 ng/mL and/or ≥30 ng/mL at week 16. Results: 398 subjects (51.1 ± 15.96 years, 74.2% females, 98.7% Caucasian) with plasma 25(OH)D levels between 10 and 20 ng/mL were randomized. A total of 376 subjects completed 16 weeks of treatment, and 355 subjects completed the study. Six patients withdrew due to an adverse event, all unrelated to treatment. At week 16, 93.6% and 74.4% of subjects receiving calcifediol 75 µg achieved response levels of ≥20 ng/mL and ≥30 ng/mL, respectively. The calcifediol 100 µg group showed 98.7% and 89.9% of responders for ≥20 ng/mL and ≥30 ng/mL, respectively. Both calcifediol groups showed superiority over placebo at each response level at all time points analyzed (p < 0.0001). Calcifediol treatments increased 25(OH)D levels from baseline to week 24 and remained stable thereafter. The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was balanced between groups. Conclusions: New weekly calcifediol 75 and 100 µg formulations showed an effective and sustained response with a good long-term safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: ProC6C is a multi-stage malaria vaccine which includes Plasmodium falciparum Circumsporozoite Protein (PfCSP), Pfs48/45 and Pfs230 sequences, designed to elicit functional antibodies that prevent sporozoite invasion of human hepatocytes (PfCSP) and parasite development in mosquitoes (Pfs48/45 and Pfs230). ProC6C formulated on Alhydrogel was evaluated in combination with Matrix-M in a Phase 1 trial in Burkina Faso. The PfCSP antibody responses were assessed for magnitude, specificity, avidity and functionality. These results compliment the prior reported safety and tolerability of ProC6C as well as the transmission reducing activity of ProC6C. Methods: The PfCSP response of ProC6C in Burkinabes in the Phase 1 trial (PACTR202201848463189) was profiled through the three vaccine administrations of 100 µg protein on Alhydrogel® alone (AlOH) or combined with 50 µg Matrix-M™ adjuvant (AlOH/Matrix-M). Serology was completed against full-length PfCSP and major/minor repeat peptides using antibody equivalence to PfCSP monoclonal antibodies (mAb 311, mAb 317 and mAb L9). Comparison of the ProC6C responses were made to those that received RTS,S/AS01 in a study conducted in Thailand. Bio-Layer Interferometry was further used to determine antibody avidity. The human IgG was subsequently purified, pooled, and evaluated in a mouse sporozoite challenge model to determine functionality. Results: A single administration of ProC6C-AlOH/Matrix-M seroconverted 19 of 20 volunteers against PfCSP and significantly enhanced antibody titers to major and minor repeats (and present through D180). At D70, ProC6C-AlOH/Matrix-M PfCSP antibodies were found to be similar to responder pools generated from Thai adults receiving RTS,S/AS01. Additionally, ProC6C antibodies were found to be competitive to established PfCSP antibodies such as mAb 317 and mAb L9. The purified and pooled IgG from human volunteers, used in a passive transfer mouse sporozoite challenge model, showed a median of 50% inhibition (P=0.0058). ProC6C PfCSP antibodies were functional in this in vivo assessment and consistent with inhibition seen by other Circumsporozoite vaccines in this model. Discussion: This analysis supports continued investigation of the antibody responses elicited by the ProC6C multi-stage malaria vaccine. This Phase 1 clinical trial demonstrated the short PfCSP sequence included in ProC6C can induce significant PfCSP antibodies in humans, which importantly were determined to be functional. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Physical activity research among patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is limited. This study examined the feasibility and potential benefits of Fit2ThriveMB, a tailored mHealth intervention. Methods: Insufficiently active individuals with MBC (n = 49) were randomized 1:1 to Fit2ThriveMB (Fit2ThriveMB app, Fitbit, and weekly coaching calls) or Healthy Lifestyle attention control (Cancer.Net app and weekly calls) for 12 weeks. Fit2ThriveMB aimed to increase daily steps via an algorithm tailored to daily symptom rating and step goal attainment. The primary outcome was feasibility defined as ≥ 80% completion rate. Secondary feasibility metrics included meeting daily step goal and wearing the Fitbit ≥ 70% of study days, fidelity, adherence to intervention features and safety. Secondary outcomes included physical activity, sedentary time, patient reported outcomes (PROs), health-related quality of life (QOL) and social cognitive theory constructs. A subsample (n = 25) completed functional performance tests via video conferencing. Results: The completion rate was 98% (n = 1 died). No related adverse events were reported. Fit2ThriveMB participants (n = 24) wore the Fitbit 92.7%, met their step goal 53.1%, set a step goal 84.6% and used the app 94.1% of 84 study days. Intent-to-treat analyses indicated trends toward improvements in activity, QOL, and some PROs, social cognitive theory constructs, and functional performance tests favoring the Fit2ThriveMB group. Significant effects favoring Fit2ThriveMB were observed for self-efficacy and goal-setting. However, some PROs and functional performance improvements favored the control group (p-values > 0.05). Conclusions: Fit2ThriveMB is feasible and safe for patients with MBC and warrants further evaluation in randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes. Registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04129346, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04129346 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) is a rare malignant nonepithelial disease, calling for combined modality treatments with surgery to further improve local control rates and long-term survival, especially in patients with multiple local recurrences with or without risk of amputation. In this double-arm, open-label, Phase II clinical trial, we will enroll 30 patients with pathologically confirmed ESTS without nodal involvement or distant metastases. Patients are randomly assigned to the combination treatment group or the radiation monotherapy group. Additionally, tumor and biological samples will be obtained directly before and after neoadjuvant therapy, allowing for studies of immune response and primary drug resistance mechanisms. Clinical Trial Registration:ChiCTR2200060659 (http://www.chictr.org.cn) (ClinicalTrials.gov). Article highlights A combined modality treatments with preoperative radiation therapy and intratumoral immunotherapy for patients with extremity soft tissue sarcomas is proposed. The clinical benefit will rely on the enhancement of immune effects and reduction of related toxicities. Neoadjuvant radiation has a comparable effect on local control and long-term survival with adjuvant radiotherapy after prolonged follow-up. Still, it has significant advantages of less late toxicity and potential benefits from de-escalated surgery, especially for patients with borderline resectable extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy with hypofractionated regimens has a shorter course of treatment since the total dose is split into larger doses given per fraction compared with standard fractionation. Notably, hypofractionated radiotherapy can facilitate antigen presentation and regulate immune function. Intratumoural injection of antitumor immunomodulator can increase therapeutic effectiveness by mediating agent accumulation in the tumor microenvironment and tumor-draining lymph nodes and may also enhance anti-tumor immunity in combination with radiotherapy. Furthermore, intratumoral immunotherapy is expected to decrease systemic immune exposure while keeping the therapeutic benefits of local control. The nRS group (neoadjuvant radiotherapy alone before surgery) will serve as a control, contrasting the nRIS group (neoadjuvant radiotherapy plus immunotherapy before surgery) in further studies. This study will access radiologic and pathological responses for efficacy evaluation and collect biological samples such as blood draws, stool samples and tumor tissues before and after neoadjuvant therapy for comprehensive mechanistic study. Research team was multidisciplinary and consisted of radiation and medical oncologists, musculoskeletal oncologic surgeons, interventional radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians and specialized pathologists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gender and racial equality, or the lack thereof, is a constantly recurring theme in neurosurgery and under-reported in neurotrauma literature. This perspective piece addresses the underrepresentation and challenges faced by women and racial minorities in neurosurgery, and within the workforce of neurotrauma, specifically. The literature demonstrates that there is still a scarcity of females and racial minorities in neurosurgery leadership positions and that females are less likely to receive invited papers. The persistent challenges in navigating gender and racial dynamics in neurosurgery/neurotrauma underscore the need for progress in advancing intersectionality within the field, emphasizing the importance of addressing inequalities. Several strategies to improve gender and racial diversity in neurotrauma workforce, leadership and academics are presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiorenal diseases represent a complex interplay between heart failure and renal dysfunction, being clinically classified as cardiorenal syndromes (CRS). Recently, the contributions of altered nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) metabolism, through deficient NAD+ synthesis and/or elevated consumption, have proved to be decisive in the onset and progress of cardiorenal disease. NAD+ is a pivotal coenzyme in cellular metabolism, being significant in various signaling pathways, such as energy metabolism, DNA damage repair, gene expression, and stress response. Convincing evidence suggests that strategies designed to boost cellular NAD+ levels are a promising therapeutic option to address cardiovascular and renal disorders. Here, we review and discuss the implications of NAD+ metabolism in cardiorenal diseases, focusing on the propitious NAD+ boosting therapeutic strategies, based on the use of NAD+ precursors, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, sirtuin activators, and other alternative approaches, such as CD38 blockade, nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase activation and combined interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In western Kenya, menstrual hygiene management (MHM) is a pervasive problem. Challenges are compounded for economically constrained women who continue to engage in sex during menses and resort to practices such as vaginal insertion of tissue and cotton to maintain dryness during sex. These practices can be harmful to the vaginal microbiome (VMB) and can lead to high rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV. This study will evaluate whether menstrual cups that can be worn during intercourse may be beneficial to the VMB and help prevent Bacterial vaginosis (BV) and STI acquisition among these economically vulnerable women. Methods: In this single-arm trial among economically vulnerable women in semi-urban western Kenya, we will evaluate the preliminary efficacy of menstrual cups on non-optimal VMB, BV, and STIs, and investigate safety, acceptability, and implementation needs. Through peer referral we aim to recruit 402 menstruating women aged 15–35 who exchange sex for money or basic needs. Women who are pregnant, have delivered in the past six months, or use an intrauterine device (IUD) will not be eligible. Participants will be seen every six months for 24 months and be asked about their sexual and MHM practices, with samples collected to assess BV and VMB. At baseline, 12-, and 24-month visits, additional samples will be collected to measure HIV and STIs (C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and T. vaginalis). HSV-2 status will be assessed at baseline. Intervention provision will consist of one reusable disc-shaped menstrual cup per participant and a group-based training within four weeks of the 12-month visit, followed by monthly telephone surveys for the first three months to assess cup use, adverse events, and provide any assistance. Primary analyses of preliminary efficacy will compare probabilities of optimal VMB, BV, and STIs in the pre-intervention period to the post-intervention period. Primary safety analyses will compare occurrence of menstrual toxic shock syndrome and cervicovaginal laceration. Discussion: If demonstrated safe and effective, this multipurpose reproductive health intervention will offer a dignified solution for the menstrual hygiene needs of women who engage in sex for livelihood and reduce their occurrence of non-optimal VMB, BV, and STIs. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05666778 (28th December, 2022); Pan African Clinical Trials Registry 202,305,912,778,108 (25th May, 2023). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Purpose Methods Results Conclusion Clinical trials play a large role in oncological. Many barriers to participation in cancer clinical trials exist, including a patient's status as “culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD)”. Globally, it is thought that CALD patients experience lower rates of trial participation, although very few studies quantify rates of cancer clinical trial participation in this group. Our study therefore aims to characterize CALD participation in cancer clinical trials in an Australian setting.We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from the Cancer Clinical Trials Centre at Austin Health, a large tertiary metropolitan cancer center in Melbourne, Australia. Participation in cancer clinical trials between groups was compared using simple descriptive analysis, Chi‐squared analysis, and logistic regression.Of 2568 patients (mean age 57.9 years, 37% female) offered entry into a cancer clinical trial between 2018 and 2023, 26% were from a CALD background (n = 678), and 9% had a preferred language other than English (n = 219). A greater proportion of non‐CALD patients participated in a cancer clinical trial compared with CALD patients (37% versus 33% respectively, p = 0.04). In logistic regression models, Arabic (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21–0.93 [univariate]) and Greek (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31–0.91 [multivariate]) language groups, along with overall CALD status (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67–0.99 [univariate]) were associated with lower cancer clinical trial participation.We found that CALD patients, those born in non‐English speaking countries, and specific language groups, were associated with lower cancer clinical trial participation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: African children with severe malaria are at increased risk of non-typhoidal salmonellae co-infection. Broad-spectrum antibiotics are recommended by guidelines but the optimal class and dose have not been established. We investigated the optimal dose of oral dispersible azithromycin and whether simple clinical criteria and point-of-care biomarkers could target antibiotics to those at greatest risk of bacterial co-infection. Methods: We conducted a phase I/II trial in Ugandan children with severe malaria comparing a 5-day course of azithromycin: 10, 15 and 20 mg/kg of azithromycin (prescribed by weight bands) spanning the dose-range effective for other salmonellae infection. We generated relevant pharmacokinetic (PK) data by sparse sampling during dosing intervals and investigated associations between azithromycin exposure and potential mechanisms (PK-pharmacodynamics) using change in C-reactive protein (CRP), a putative marker of sepsis, at 72 h (continuous) and microbiological cure (7-day) (binary), alone and as a composite with 7-day and 90-day survival. To assess whether clinical or biomarkers could identify those at risk of sepsis, a non-severe malaria control was concurrently enrolled. Results: Between January 2020 and January 2022, 105 cases were randomised azithromycin doses: 35 to 10 mg/kg, 35 to 15 mg/kg and 35 to 20 mg/kg. Fifty non-severe malaria controls were concurrently enrolled. CRP reduced in all arms by 72 h with a mean reduction of 65.8 mg/L (95% CI 57.1, 74.5) in the 10 mg/kg arm, 64.8 mg/L (95% CI 56.5, 73.1; p = 0.87) in the 20 mg/kg arm and a smaller reduction 51.2 mg/L (95% CI 42.9, 59.5; p = 0.02) in the 15 mg/kg arm. Microbiological cure alone outcome was not analysed as only one pathogen was found among cases. Three events contributed to the composite outcome of 7-day survival and microbiological cure, with no events in the 15 mg/kg arm. The odds ratio comparing 20 vs 10 mg/kg was 0.50 (95% CI 0.04, 5.79); p = 0.58. Due to the low number of pathogens identified, it was not possible to identify better methods for targeting antibiotics including both the cases and controls. Conclusions: We found no evidence for an association between systemic azithromycin exposure and reduction in CRP. Further work is needed to better identify children at highest risk from bacterial co-infection. Trial registration: ISRCTN49726849 (registered on 27th October 2017). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (RARH) as a minimally invasive procedure in patients with cervical cancer that is curable by surgery. Materials and methods: This study was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm clinical trial. The short-term outcome of open radical hysterectomy was used as the historical control. The primary endpoint was successful surgery with minimal blood loss (300 mL or less) and negative surgical margins. Secondary endpoints included surgical outcomes, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) rates. Results: Overall, 101 cases were enrolled in this study at 10 participating medical institutions and 100 underwent RARH. Among these cases, 89 met the primary endpoint, exceeding the threshold of 0.75 set by the lower limit. At 2 years postoperatively, 17 cases had recurrences, 4 were classified as International federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Stage IB1 or lower, while 13 as IB2 or higher. There were three deaths, including one in Stage IB1 and two in Stage IIB in the second postoperative year, all of which had lymph node metastasis. The oncological outcomes for all cases showed RFS and OS rates of 82.7% and 96.9%, respectively, over a median observation period of 37 months. For cases with Stage IB1, RFS and OS were 94.1% and 98.5%, respectively. Conclusion: RARH demonstrated a significant reduction in blood loss while ensuring radicality, indicating the safety and efficacy of this procedure compared to conventional RH. Although it is conceivable that the results of this oncological analysis could change, as the data collection has not been fully completed, we plan to further evaluate the oncologic outcomes of RARH in future studies. Trial registration: UMIN-CTR: UMIN000022278, registered on 11th May 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary The study aims to test the efficacy of a family‐centred healthy lifestyle program in primary care health centres among children with overweight or obesity, evaluating the results at 3, 6, and 9 months post‐intervention. A single‐blind, randomised controlled cluster study where participants will be blinded to group assignment to reduce bias will be followed. The intervention comprises a 6‐month program with intensive and maintenance behavioural therapies, including dietary modifications and guidelines for physical activity, administered by a multidisciplinary team. Participants will be assigned to an intervention group or a treatment‐as‐usual control group. Primary health centres in Seeb Wilayat, serving densely populated areas and willing to participate, will be included. Randomisation will be conducted at the cluster level to improve recruitment efficiency. A sample size calculation will ensure adequate power to detect significant differences. Ethical approval is granted and informed consent/assent will be obtained from all participants. The proposed study focusses on testing the efficacy of a family‐centred healthy lifestyle program in primary care centres through a controlled, randomised study. Successful outcomes could lead to informed interventions, improvements in the health system, policy recommendations, positive community impacts, information on behavioural therapies, and improved long‐term health outcomes for affected children and their families. This study will contribute to the literature by providing a culturally sensitive and evidence‐based solution to a pressing public health issue, which can be adapted to similar contexts in Oman and beyond. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Materials and Methods Results Conclusions Type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with a clinical phenotype characterized by a high degree of insulin resistance are at increased risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD). We previously demonstrated that the endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) atrasentan reduced insulin resistance in T2D. In this study, we compared the effect of atrasentan on insulin resistance across different phenotypic clusters of patients with T2D.We performed a post hoc analysis of the SONAR trial, a randomized, placebo‐controlled trial of the ERA atrasentan in patients with T2D and CKD. Patients were stratified into four previously identified phenotypic clusters: severe insulin‐deficient diabetes (SIDD), severe insulin‐resistant diabetes (SIRD), mild obesity‐related diabetes (MOD) and mild age‐related diabetes (MARD). Changes in insulin resistance, assessed by HOMA‐IR, were compared between the phenotypic clusters using a mixed effects model.In total, 931 patients were included in the analysis. In the overall population, atrasentan compared to placebo reduced HOMA‐IR by 12.9% [95%CI 3.5,21.4]. This effect of atrasentan was more pronounced in clusters characterized by insulin resistance or deficiency: (SIRD cluster 26.2% [95% CI 3.8,43.3] and SIDD cluster 18.5% [95%CI −3.8,35.9]), although the latter did not reach statistical significance. The effect of atrasentan compared to placebo was less pronounced in the other two clusters (MARD 12.2% [95% CI −1.7,24.12] and MOD −5.3% [95% CI −28.9,13.9]).Atrasentan significantly improved insulin sensitivity in patients with T2D and CKD, especially in those characterized by high insulin resistance (SIRD cluster). Further studies are warranted to investigate the long‐term clinical outcomes of atrasentan treatment in these distinct phenotypic clusters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Methods Results Conclusion Left ventricular (LV) unloading is a crucial intervention to decrease the harmful consequences of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on hemodynamic status in cardiogenic shock (CS) patients. However, a lingering question preoccupies experts: Should we intervene early or wait until clinical deterioration caused by increasing afterload is detected?A systematic review and meta‐analysis synthesizing studies, which were retrieved by systematically searching PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through December 2023. We used R V. 4.3 to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). PROSPERO ID: CRD42024501643.Eight studies with 2.117 patients were included. Early/prophylactic LV unloading was associated with a lower incidence of all‐cause mortality [RR: 0.87 with 95% CI (0.79, 0.95), p < 0.01]. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding cardiac mortality [RR: 1.01 with 95% CI (0.68, 1.48), p = 0.98], non‐cardiac mortality [RR: 0.86 with 95% CI (0.46, 1.62), p = 0.64], and in‐hospital mortality [RR: 0.95 with 95% CI (0.86, 1.05), p = 0.30]. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding ECMO weaning, myocardial recovery, ECMO duration, and length of hospitalization.Early/prophylactic LV unloading during ECMO for CS patients was associated with a decreased incidence of all‐cause mortality and sepsis or infection, with no effect on ECMO weaning, myocardial recovery, ECMO duration, and hospital length of stay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aficamten is a cardiac myosin inhibitor that mitigates left ventricular outflow gradients in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). The clinical efficacy of aficamten across multiple outcome domains in oHCM has not been fully defined. This responder analysis from the SEQUOIA-HCM (Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Aficamten Compared to Placebo in Adults With Symptomatic oHCM) trial characterizes the clinical impact of aficamten. Patients who were symptomatic of oHCM were randomized to aficamten (n = 142) or placebo (n = 140) daily for 24 weeks. Outcomes assessed included the proportion of patients with complete hemodynamic response (rest and Valsalva gradient <30 mm Hg and <50 mm Hg, respectively), relief in limiting symptoms (≥1 improvement in NYHA functional class and/or ≥10-point change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire–Clinical Summary Score), enhanced exercise capacity (≥1.5 mL/kg/min change in peak oxygen uptake), and ≥50% reduction in N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide. Eligibility for septal reduction therapy was also evaluated. At 24 weeks, patients treated with aficamten vs placebo showed significant improvement in limiting symptoms (71% vs 42%), were more likely to have complete hemodynamic response (68% vs 7%), demonstrated enhanced exercise capacity (47% vs 24%), and showed a decrease ≥50% in N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (84% vs 8%) (P ≤ 0.002 for all). An improvement in ≥1 of these outcome measures was achieved in 97% of patients treated with aficamten (vs 59% placebo), including 23% on aficamten who achieved all 4 outcomes compared with none in placebo. Among 32 patients receiving aficamten and 29 patients receiving placebo who were eligible for septal reduction therapy, 28 (88%) from the aficamten group were no longer eligible at 24 weeks compared with 15 (52%) from the placebo group (P = 0.002). Treatment with aficamten was associated with substantial improvements across a broad range of clinically relevant efficacy measures. These results underscore the wide-ranging potential of aficamten for treatment of patients with symptomatic oHCM (Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Aficamten Compared to Placebo in Adults with oHCM [SEQUOIA-HCM]; NCT05186818) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is an acute brain injury caused by sudden occlusion of a blood vessel. Endovascular therapy is the most effective way to restore blood flow. However, despite the restoration of blood flow in some patients, their clinical prognosis often remains unsatisfactory. Albumin has shown neuroprotective effects in animal models of AIS. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of local arterial infusions of 20% human serum albumin solution as an adjuvant therapy after endovascular therapy in patients with AIS. Methods: This study is a prospective, therapeutic exploratory, non-randomized, open-label, phase 1 clinical trial testing the use of 20% human serum albumin solution injected via the artery immediately after successful reperfusion in patients with AIS. The study is divided into two stages. In the first stage, a single-dose-finding will explore the maximum safe dose according to the 3 + 3 dose escalation principle;, with the maximum dose being 0.60 g/kg. After recanalizing the occluded blood vessel, human serum albumin solution will be injected into the internal carotid artery region through a guiding catheter for 30 min. The second stage involves an albumin adjuvant therapy cohort (AT) and an endovascular treatment lonely cohort (ET). The AT cohort will encompass at least 15 additional participants to complete safety trials at the maximum safe dose determined in the first stage. The ET cohort will include well-matched patients receiving endovascular therapy alone, derived from a contemporaneous prospective registry, who will be excluded from having cardiopulmonary disorders and from receiving any neuroprotective therapy. The primary outcome of this study will be symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Efficacy outcomes will include the proportion of patients with the progression of cerebral infarction volume, a modified Rankin Scale of 0–2 on day 90 after randomization. An exploratory secondary outcome will be the analysis of thromboinflammatory and neuroprotective molecule profiles. Conclusion: This pilot trial aims to explore the safety and efficacy of arterial infusion of an albumin solution after occlusive vessel opening in AIS. The results will provide data parameters for subsequent tests on the arterial infusion of albumin solutions. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05953623. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper proposes a trial design for locating group‐specific doses when groups are partially or completely ordered by dose sensitivity. Previous trial designs for partially ordered groups are model‐based, whereas the proposed method is model‐assisted, providing clinicians with a design that is simpler. The proposed method performs similarly to model‐based methods, providing simplicity without losing accuracy. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, the proposed method is the first paper on dose‐finding for partially ordered groups with convergence results. To generalize the proposed method, a framework is introduced that allows partial orders to be transferred to a grid format with a known ordering across rows but an unknown ordering within rows. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To test whether a personality feedback intervention improves three domains of cancer self‐management: self‐awareness, self‐efficacy, and positive affect. Methods: From 11/2020‐02/2021, 372 adults diagnosed with cancer participated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an intervention that entailed reading a brief personality‐related excerpt during an online survey. Eligibility included self‐reported age ≥ 18 years, current or past cancer diagnosis, and ability to read English. The survey included a baseline assessment with a personality questionnaire, then randomized participants to one of two groups. The intervention group (n = 184) received a personality feedback report with tailored self‐care tips, whereas the control group (n = 188) received a generic reading on personality theory. At the end of the survey, participants completed outcome measures of self‐awareness (primary), self‐efficacy for illness management, and positive affect. General linear models tested between‐group differences in changes from baseline to post‐test on each outcome. Results: There was no intervention effect on self‐awareness (primary outcome) or positive affect. However, compared to controls, intervention participants experienced a greater increase in self‐efficacy for illness management (d = 0.33, p = 0.002), including in 2 of 3 constituent domains: self‐efficacy for managing symptoms (d = 0.36, p < 0.001) and self‐efficacy for managing treatments/medication (d = 0.22, p = 0.035). Conclusion: Despite the primary outcome's null results, this was the first RCT of a personality feedback intervention to show improvements in self‐efficacy for managing chronic illness. Given the important role of self‐efficacy in self‐management, the intervention has implications for other cancer outcomes. Follow‐up studies on longer‐term outcomes such as health behaviors and quality of life should be explored. Trial Registration: NCT04625439 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease of the pilosebaceous unit frequently cited as the most common condition diagnosed and treated by dermatologists. Among the many therapies developed for treating acne, none are effective for all patients and new treatments are always being sought. A commercial nutraceutical formulated with vitamins, minerals and a proprietary blend of botanicals has been used as a safe and effective adjunctive therapy for non-cystic acne (Clear Skin Formula; VitaMedica®). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this nutraceutical for treating non-cystic acne. METHODS: Subjects randomly received study product (n=26) or placebo capsules (n=14) which were taken daily for 84 days. RESULTS: Treatment with the nutraceutical supplement decreased mean (SD) inflammatory lesions counts from 21.4 (9.3) to 10.4 (8.1) (p=0.0001), decreased non-inflammatory lesion counts from 35.0 (17.1) to 19.5 (13.2) (p<0.0001) versus nonsignificant changes for placebo-treated subjects. Mean baseline IGA scores improved by nearly 1 grade from 2.3 (0.5) to 1.4 (0.6) after 84 days of treatment (p<0.0001) versus no change for subjects treated with placebo. The clinical improvements corresponded with significant improvements in acne-related quality of life measures. The nutraceutical supplement was well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate this nutraceutical to be safe and effective adjunctive therapy for patients with non-cystic acne. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Nab‐sirolimus (ABI‐009, nab‐rapamycin; Aadi Bioscience Inc. [Aadi]) is a human albumin‐bound form of sirolimus nanoparticles, a potent mTOR inhibitor. This phase I trial was conducted to define dose‐limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated or recommended phase II dose (MTD/RP2D), and pharmacokinetics of Nab‐sirolimus in combination with temozolomide and irinotecan. Methods: Using a rolling 6 design, Nab‐sirolimus was administered intravenously (IV) on days (D) 1 and 8 of cycle (C) 1. In subsequent cycles, Nab‐sirolimus was administered D1 and D8 in combination with temozolomide (125 mg/m2/dose, maximum 250 mg/dose) and irinotecan (90 mg/m2/dose) orally, daily on D1–5. Cycle duration was 21 days. Three dose levels (DL) of Nab‐sirolimus were investigated (DL1: 35 mg/m2/dose, DL‐1: 20 mg/m2/dose, and DL‐2: 15 mg/m2/dose). The observation period for estimating the MTD/RP2D was defined by cycles 1 and 2. Results: Thirty‐three patients were enrolled, 32 were eligible. Dose determination included 17 evaluable patients, median (range) age 12 (2–20) years and six additional patients were enrolled (four evaluable for toxicity) on a pharmacokinetic cohort. C1 or C2 DLTs were primarily thrombocytopenia including 2/5 patients at DL1, 2/6 patients at DL‐1, and 1/6 patients at DL‐2. One patient (DL1) with Ewing Sarcoma had a partial response and remained on study for 35 cycles. Rapamycin clearance was dose dependent. Irinotecan clearance and its active metabolite SN‐38 exposure were not affected by coadministration with Nab‐sirolimus. Conclusion: The MTD for Nab‐sirolimus was 15 mg/m2/dose IV on D1 and D8 in combination with temozolomide 125 mg/m2/dose and oral irinotecan 90 mg/m2/dose daily for 5 days during 21D cycles. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02975882 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antibody‐drug conjugates (ADCs), chemotherapeutic agents conjugated to an antibody to enhance their targeted delivery to tumors, represent a significant advancement in cancer therapy. ADCs combine the precise targeting capabilities of antibodies and the potent cell‐killing effects of chemotherapy, allowing for enhanced cytotoxicity to tumors while minimizing damage to healthy tissues. Here, we provide an overview of the current clinical landscape of ADCs, highlighting 11 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)‐approved products and discussing over 500 active clinical trials investigating newer ADCs. We also discuss some key challenges associated with the clinical translation of ADCs and highlight emerging strategies to overcome these hurdles. Our discussions will provide useful guidelines for the future development of safer and more effective ADCs for a broader range of indications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Given the prevalence of hematological conditions, surgeries, and trauma incidents, hemostats—therapeutics designed to control and arrest bleeding—are an important tool in patient care. The prophylactic and therapeutic use of hemostats markedly enhances survival rates and improves the overall quality of life of patients suffering from these conditions. Since their inception in the 1960s, hemostats have witnessed remarkable progress in terms of the active ingredients utilized, therapeutic outcomes, demonstrated efficacy, and the storage stability. In this review, we provide a comprehensive analysis of commercially available hemostats approved by the FDA, along with newer investigative hemostats currently in active clinical trials. We delve into the modality of active ingredients, route of administration, formulation type, and disease indications of these approved and investigative hemostats. Further, we analyze the trends observed in the hemostat actives for Hemophilia A and B, concluding with insights into the emerging patterns and noteworthy developments to watch for in this dynamic field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]