51. Derivation and validation of predictive indices for 30-day mortality after coronary and valvular surgery in Ontario, Canada
- Author
-
Louise Y. Sun, Vicki Alexopoulos, Anna Chu, Derrick Y. Tam, Christopher M Feindel, Peter C. Austin, Maral Ouzounian, Natasa Tusevljak, Garth H Oakes, Douglas S. Lee, Xuesong Wang, and Jiming Fang
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Bypass grafting ,Logistic regression ,Aortic valve replacement ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Internal medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,Registries ,Derivation ,Coronary Artery Bypass ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ,Ontario ,business.industry ,Research ,Mortality rate ,General Medicine ,Perioperative ,Middle Aged ,Health Services ,medicine.disease ,surgical procedures, operative ,30 day mortality ,Aortic Valve ,Cardiology ,Female ,business ,Ontario canada - Abstract
Background Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) are the 2 most common cardiac surgery procedures in North America. We derived and externally validated clinical models to estimate the likelihood of death within 30 days of CABG, AVR or combined CABG + AVR. Methods We obtained data from the CorHealth Ontario Cardiac Registry and several linked population health administrative databases from Ontario, Canada. We derived multiple logistic regression models from all adult patients who underwent CABG, AVR or combined CABG + AVR from April 2017 to March 2019, and validated them in 2 temporally distinct cohorts (April 2015 to March 2017 and April 2019 to March 2020). Results The derivation cohorts included 13 435 patients who underwent CABG (30-d mortality 1.73%), 1970 patients who underwent AVR (30-d mortality 1.68%) and 1510 patients who underwent combined CABG + AVR (30-d mortality 3.05%). The final models for predicting 30-day mortality included 15 variables for patients undergoing CABG, 5 variables for patients undergoing AVR and 5 variables for patients undergoing combined CABG + AVR. Model discrimination was excellent for the CABG (c-statistic 0.888, optimism-corrected 0.866) AVR (c-statistic 0.850, optimism-corrected 0.762) and CABG + AVR (c-statistic 0.844, optimism-corrected 0.776) models, with similar results in the validation cohorts. Interpretation Our models, leveraging readily available, multidimensional data sources, computed accurate risk-adjusted 30-day mortality rates for CABG, AVR and combined CABG + AVR, with discrimination comparable to more complex American and European models. The ability to accurately predict perioperative mortality rates for these procedures will be valuable for quality improvement initiatives across institutions.
- Published
- 2021