Search

The methods used for abortion in the second trimester have changed considerably in recent years. The surgical procedure dilatation and evacuation (D&E) has replaced hysterotomy. Instead of injecting different compounds, such as hypertonic saline, prostaglandin analogues are administered by non-invasive routes. The most effective medical method is combining a prostaglandin analogue with mifepristone. The consequence of these developments is that abortion in the second trimester can be be performed significantly more effectively and that the currently recommended methods being used are associated with fewer side effects and complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The safety and efficacy of the anti-progestogen Org 31710 in improving cycle control in healthy women using the desogestrel progestogen-only pill was investigated in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.Methods: A total of 103 women using the 75 micro g desogestrel progestogen-only pill daily also received either 150 mg Org 31710 or placebo once every 28 days, starting on day 1, for a duration of 4-7 treatment cycles.Results: The percentage of women with bleeding or spotting (B/S) every day in the placebo group was on average 30% during the whole treatment period and no days without reported B/S occurred. In contrast, a cyclic pattern was observed for the Org 31710 group; a peak incidence of B/S was observed on day 3 or 4 of each cycle, followed by a sharp decrease on cycle days 9-15. Compared with controls, less subjects in the Org 31710 group reported irregular, frequent or prolonged bleeding. These differences were clearly observed in the initial cycles, but were somewhat less pronounced during the later cycles of the treatment period. A relatively high incidence of B/S episodes starting in the second section of the cycle was also observed.Conclusion: The addition of Org 31710 once a month improved cycle control in women using daily treatment with 75 micro g desogestrel. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effect of a low dose of mifepristone (RU486) on ovarian and endometrial function was studied in 14 healthy women. The study included one control and two treatment cycles. During the treatment cycles, either 2.5 mg (n = 9) or 5 mg (n = 5) of mifepristone was administered once weekly. The concentration of ovarian steroids and luteinizing hormone (LH) in urine was measured daily, cortisol in blood once weekly and glycodelin (placental protein 14; PP14) at the time of menstruation. Ovarian function was monitored by vaginal ultrasound. An endometrial biopsy was taken in each cycle in the mid-luteal phase, based on self-measurement of the LH peak, or on cycle day 22 if no LH peak could be detected. In the evaluation of the results, the outcome of the enzyme immunoassay of LH was used to date the biopsy. Endometrial progesterone and oestrogen receptors and Dolichus biflorus agglutmin (DBA) lectin binding were measured. Ovulation was not inhibited by treatment with mifepristone, and an LH peak could be determined in all control and treatment cycles. However, in four subjects (one with the higher and three with the lower dose) the follicular phase was prolonged by 6–13 days. The duration of the luteal phase and the concentrations of pregnanediol and oestrone glucuronide were not affected by treatment A dose of 5 mg, and to a lesser extent 2.5 mg, mifepristone once weekly caused desynchron-ization of endometrial development Endometrial progesterone receptor, but not oestrogen receptor, concentration was significantly increased by the higher dose. A significant reduction in DBA-lectin binding and in serum glycodelin concentrations was also found. Thus, low doses of mifepristone do not inhibit ovulation but delay endometrial development and impair secretory activity. Whether these effects are sufficient to prevent implantation remains to be established. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The effect of a single post-ovulatory dose of RU486 on endometrial maturation was studied in the implantation phase. A total of 11 healthy women were followed for one control and one or two treatment cycles. In treatment cycles, a dose of 200 or 400 mg RU486 was administered on day luteinizing hormone (LH)+2. In both control and treatment cycles, an endometrial biopsy was obtained on LH+6 to LH+8. These biopsies were assessed by morphometric and immunohistochemical analyses. The treatment with RU486 did not disturb the normal menstrual rhythm but caused a significant inhibition in the endometrial development. Glandular progesterone receptor staining was significantly more pronounced after RU486 treatment, while there was a reduction in the Dolichos biflorus agglutinin lectin binding, indicating inhibition of the normal secretory transformation of the endometrium. It is likely that these effects on endometrial development and secretory activity represent the basis of the contraceptive effect of post-ovulatory RU486 treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It has been shown that the antiprogestin RU 486 (mifepristone) increases the sensitivity of the early pregnant human uterus to the stimulatory action of synthetic prostaglandin E (PGE) analogues. To examine if RU 486 also increases uterine sensitivity to the naturally occurring PGE2 given orally, two investigative approaches were used in the present studies: (i) direct registration of uterine contractions before and after PGE2 administration in untreated and RU 486-treated early pregnant women; and (ii) a double-blind, randomized, controlled efficacy trial involving treatment of pregnant women (amenorrhoea of less than or equal to 49 days) with RU 486 (25 mg twice daily for 4 days) and PGE2 (1 mg once or twice) or placebo on the last day of RU 486 treatment. The results indicate that oral PGE2 at the doses employed had little or no stimulatory effect on uterine contractility and that it did not improve the rate of complete abortion achieved with RU 486 alone. Overall, 25 of 42 women (59%) had a complete abortion, 15 women (36%) did not abort and the remaining two had incomplete abortions. Women with complete abortions had significantly lower pretreatment levels of progesterone and a longer duration of induced bleeding than those who did not abort. Thus oral PGE2, when given in clinically acceptable doses, is not a suitable alternative to synthetic PGE analogues for use in combination with RU 486 for termination of early pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Seventeen healthy women aged 24–45 years with regular menstrual periods, proven fertility and not using steroidal contraceptives or IUD were recruited for the study. The volunteers were followed during one control, one treatment and one follow-up cycle. Daily morning urine samples were obtained during the control and the treatment cycle. The samples were analysed with regard to pregnanediol glucuronide (P-G), oestrone glucuronide (E-G), oestradiol (E), progesterone (P), LH and creatinine. During the entire 3-month study the subjects kept a record of uterine bleeding and side effects. The subjects received 50 mg RU486 daily either on cycle days 7–10 ( = 7) or on cycle days 20–23 ( = 10). An endometrial biopsy was taken on cycle day 10 in the first group and on cycle days 21–28 in the second group of patients. Treatment during the proliferative phase caused significant prolongation of the cycle length due to a delay of the oestrogen and LH surge. However, once the oestrogen concentration started to increase, the remaining part of the cycle was normal. The length of the follow-up cycle was similar to that of the control cycle. The morphology of the endometrium did not differ from control samples taken from untreated women at the same time of the cycle. All ovulating women ( = 9) treated in the mid-luteal phase started to bleed on the 3rd to 4th day of the treatment. In four of these women the bleeding was scanty and followed by a menstrual-like bleeding at expected time, while in the remaining five volunteers the treatment bleeding was heavier and not followed by a new bleeding until a month later. The duration of the secretory phase was 16.5 ± 1.3 days in women with two bleeding episodes and 11.8 ± 1.9 days in women with one bleeding episode ( < 0.05). The hormonal parameters were similar in both groups up to the start of the treatment. In the patients with one bleeding episode, the treatment was associated with a reduction in progesterone concentration, while in the patients with two bleeding episodes the progesterone concentration remained elevated until the second bleeding episode. Light microscopic examination of the endometrium revealed unique changes in the endometrial morphology. The results indicate that RU486 acts mainly on the endometrium but a direct or indirect effect on the corpus luteum cannot be excluded. The age of the corpus luteum may be of importance for its susceptibility to RU486 treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]