Search

Results from a recent field campaign are used to assess the accuracy of wind speed and direction precision estimates produced by a Doppler lidar wind retrieval algorithm. The algorithm, which is based on the traditional velocity-azimuth-display (VAD) technique, estimates the wind speed and direction measurement precision using standard error propagation techniques. For this study, the lidar was configured to execute an 8-beam plan-position-indicator (PPI) scan once every 12 minutes during the 6 week deployment period. Several wind retrieval trials were conducted using different schemes for estimating the uncertainty in the radial velocity measurements. The resulting wind speed and direction precision estimates were compared to differences in wind speed and direction between the VAD algorithm and sonic anemometer measurements taken on a nearby 300-m tower.

All trials produced qualitatively similar wind fields with negligible bias, but substantially different wind speed and direction precision fields. The most accurate wind speed and direction precisions were obtained when the radial velocity uncertainty was determined by direct calculation of radial velocity standard deviation along each pointing direction and range gate of the PPI scan. By contrast, setting the radial velocity uncertainty to the radial velocity precision (thereby ignoring turbulence effects) resulted in wind speed and direction precisions that were biased far too low and poor indicators of data quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During the eXperimental Planetary boundary layer Instrumentation Assessment (XPIA) campaign, which was carried out at the Boulder Atmospheric Observatory (BAO) in spring 2015, multiple-Doppler scanning strategies were performed with scanning wind lidars and Ka-band radars. Specifically, step-stare measurements were performed simultaneously with three scanning Doppler lidars, while two scanning Ka-band radars performed simultaneous range height indicator (RHI) scans. The XPIA experiment provided the unique opportunity to compare directly virtual tower measurements performed simultaneously with Ka-band radars and Doppler wind lidars. Furthermore, multiple-Doppler measurements were assessed against sonic anemometer data acquired from the met-tower present at the BAO site and a lidar wind profiler. This survey shows that despite the different technologies, measurement volumes and sampling periods used for the lidar and radar measurements, a great accuracy is achieved for both remote sensing techniques for probing horizontal wind speed and wind direction with the virtual tower scanning technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Addressing the need for high-quality wind information aloft in the layer occupied by turbine rotors (~30-150 m above ground level) is one of many significant challenges facing the wind energy industry. Without wind measurements at heights within the rotor sweep of the turbines, characteristics of the flow in this layer are unknown for wind energy and modeling purposes. Since flow in this layer is often decoupled from the surface, near-surface measurements are prone to errant extrapolation to these heights, and the behavior of the near-surface winds may not reflect that of the upper-level flow. INSETS: PROFILING;DIURNAL CYCLE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of the Indianapolis Flux Experiment (INFLUX) is to develop, evaluate and improve methods for measuring greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from cities. INFLUX's scientific objectives are to quantify CO 2 and CH 4 emission rates at 1 km resolution with a 10% or better accuracy and precision, to determine whole-city emissions with similar skill, and to achieve high (weekly or finer) temporal resolution at both spatial resolutions. The experiment employs atmospheric GHG measurements from both towers and aircraft, atmospheric transport observations and models, and activity-based inventory products to quantify urban GHG emissions. Multiple, independent methods for estimating urban emissions are a central facet of our experimental design. INFLUX was initiated in 2010 and measurements and analyses are ongoing. To date we have quantified urban atmospheric GHG enhancements using aircraft and towers with measurements collected over multiple years, and have estimated whole-city CO 2 and CH 4 emissions using aircraft and tower GHG measurements, and inventory methods. Significant differences exist across methods; these differences have not yet been resolved; research to reduce uncertainties and reconcile these differences is underway. Sectorally- and spatially-resolved flux estimates, and detection of changes of fluxes over time, are also active research topics. Major challenges include developing methods for distinguishing anthropogenic from biogenic CO 2 fluxes, improving our ability to interpret atmospheric GHG measurements close to urban GHG sources and across a broader range of atmospheric stability conditions, and quantifying uncertainties in inventory data products. INFLUX data and tools are intended to serve as an open resource and test bed for future investigations. Well-documented, public archival of data and methods is under development in support of this objective., Competing Interests: Competing interests The authors have no competing interests to declare.