51. Influence of observer preferences and auscultatory skill on the choice of terms to describe lung sounds: a survey of staff physicians, residents and medical students
- Author
-
Gabriel Izbicki, Hava Azulai, Abraham Bohadana, George Kalak, and Amir Jarjoui
- Subjects
Adult ,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Students, Medical ,Stethoscope ,Breath sound ,Stridor ,lcsh:Medicine ,Lung sound ,Audiology ,law.invention ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Pleural friction rub ,law ,Physicians ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,medicine ,Humans ,Respiratory Physiology ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Israel ,Language ,Respiratory Sounds ,lcsh:RC705-779 ,Lung ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,lcsh:R ,Internship and Residency ,lcsh:Diseases of the respiratory system ,Auscultation ,Middle Aged ,not applicable ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,030228 respiratory system ,Crackles ,Clinical Competence ,medicine.symptom ,business - Abstract
BackgroundIn contrast with the technical progress of the stethoscope, lung sound terminology has remained confused, weakening the usefulness of auscultation. We examined how observer preferences regarding terminology and auscultatory skill influenced the choice of terms used to describe lung sounds.MethodsThirty-one staff physicians (SP), 65 residents (R) and 47 medical students (MS) spontaneously described the audio recordings of 5 lung sounds classified acoustically as: (1) normal breath sound; (2) wheezes; (3) crackles; (4) stridor and (5) pleural friction rub. A rating was considered correct if a correct term or synonym was used to describe it (term use ascribed to preference). The use of any incorrect terms was ascribed to deficient auscultatory skill.ResultsRates of correct sound identification were: (i) normal breath sound: SP=21.4%; R=11.6%; MS=17.1%; (ii) wheezes: SP=82.8%; R=85.2%; MS=86.4%; (iii) crackles: SP=63%; R=68.5%; MS=70.7%; (iv) stridor: SP=92.8%; R=90%; MS=72.1% and (v) pleural friction rub: SP=35.7%; R=6.2%; MS=3.2%. The 3 groups used 66 descriptive terms: 17 were ascribed to preferences regarding terminology, and 49 to deficient auscultatory skill. Three-group agreement on use of a term occurred on 107 occasions: 70 involved correct terms (65.4%) and 37 (34.6%) incorrect ones. Rate of use of recommended terms, rather than accepted synonyms, was 100% for the wheezes and the stridor, 55% for the normal breath sound, 22% for the crackles and 14% for the pleural friction rub.ConclusionsThe observers’ ability to describe lung sounds was high for the wheezes and the stridor, fair for the crackles and poor for the normal breath sound and the pleural friction rub. Lack of auscultatory skill largely surpassed observer preference as a factor determining the choice of terminology. Wide dissemination of educational programs on lung auscultation (eg, self-learning via computer-assisted learning tools) is urgently needed to promote use of standardised lung sound terminology.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF