Search

By David Lambert. New York: Facts On File, 2002. 400p. acid free $60.50 (ISBN 0-8160-4547-X). Encyclopedia of Prehistory, described in its introduction as a 'thematic encyclopedia,' covers an ambitious range [...]

Walker's Manual of Community Bank Stocks. 1st ed. Lafayette, Calif.: Walker's Manual, LLC, 1997. 502p. $100 (ISBN 0-9652088-7-7). How many times have reference librarians advised patrons seeking company information that [...]

Objective: Tracheal gas insufflation (TGI) reduces PaCO2 by flushing the tracheal and mechanical deadspace, and may have its maximum benefit when TGI gas is unopposed by significant expiratory gas flow. Thus, limiting TGI to the late expiratory period may diminish tracheal exposure to TGI gas while preserving the efficacy of TGI. This study examined the gas exchange consequences of such late-expiratory TGI. Design and setting: Randomized controlled trial, animal study. Materials: Eleven pigs. Interventions: After stable lung injury was established using oleic acid 11 pigs were ventilated using a standardized lung protective strategy. Phasic expiratory TGI was applied for 30 min stages during the last 20%, 40%, 60%, and 100% of expiration in random sequence. PaCO2 was continuously measured via an indwelling blood gas analysis system. Measurements and results: PaCO2 at baseline was 86.1±4.7 mmHg, and decreased progressively with increasing TGI duration of 20%, 40%, and 60%, but not 100%, of expiration (PaCO2=75.7±5.2, 68.8±3.6, 65.1±5.3 and 65.2±5.2 mmHg, respectively). For all stages the reduction in PaCO2 relative to baseline was significant. Trends of increasing PaO2 and airway pressure with increasing TGI duration were noted and most likely associated with a TGI-induced increase in lung volume. Conclusions: Under these conditions confining TGI to the final 60% of expiration achieved effective PaCO2 reduction, not significantly different from panexpiratory TGI, while limiting exposure of the trachea to TGI gas, and reducing the potential for TGI-induced hyperinflation. These findings suggest that TGI is most effectively applied in a phasic manner in late expiration, with its duration titrated to effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reviews the computer software Market Share and Business Rankings Worldwide by Gale company. ISBN 0-7876-0285-X

Background and Purpose: Randomised trials testing 15- or 16-fraction regimens of adjuvant radiotherapy in women with early breast cancer have reported favourable outcomes compared with standard fractionation. To evaluate hypofractionation further, two 5-fraction schedules delivering 1 fraction per week have been tested against a 25-fraction regimen., Materials and Methods: Women aged ⩾50years with node negative early breast cancer were randomly assigned after microscopic complete tumour resection to 50Gy in 25 fractions versus 28.5 or 30Gy in 5 once-weekly fractions of 5.7 or 6.0Gy, respectively, to the whole breast. The primary endpoint was 2-year change in photographic breast appearance., Results: Nine hundred and fifteen women were recruited from 2004 to 2007. Seven hundred and twenty-nine patients had 2-year photographic assessments. Risk ratios for mild/marked change were 1.70 (95% CI 1.26-2.29, p<0.001) for 30Gy and 1.15 (0.82-1.60, p=0.489) for 28.5Gy versus 50Gy. Three-year rates of physician-assessed moderate/marked adverse effects in the breast were 17.3% (13.3-22.3%, p<0.001) for 30Gy and 11.1% (7.9-15.6%, p=0.18) for 28.5Gy compared with 9.5% (6.5-13.7%) after 50Gy. With a median follow-up in survivors of 37.3months, 2 local tumour relapses and 23 deaths have occurred., Conclusions: At 3years median follow-up, 28.5Gy in 5 fractions is comparable to 50Gy in 25 fractions, and significantly milder than 30Gy in 5 fractions, in terms of adverse effects in the breast., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Demand oxygen delivery systems (DODS) allot oxygen by interrupting the oxygen flow during exhalation, when it would mostly be wasted. Because DODS conserve oxygen by various methods, there are important performance differences between DODS. We studied certain performance factors that have not previously been carefully examined., Methods: A bench model was constructed to simulate a nose, airway, and alveolar chamber. A breathing simulator generated 4 respiratory patterns, at frequencies of 15, 20, 25, and 30 breaths/min. Eighteen models of DODS were tested at 4 settings, each up to the maximum output, and compared to continuous-flow oxygen. The variable of interest was the fraction of inspired oxygen (F(I)O(2)) in the alveolar chamber, which was measured for each condition., Results: The DODS differed from continuous-flow oxygen, delivering 0.5-2.1 times (mean = 1.13 times) the F(I)O(2) increase at similar settings. During maximum output the DODS showed a wide range of F(I)O(2), from 0.27 to 0.46. There was a direct relationship between volume output per pulse in the first 0.6 s of inhalation and the delivered F(I)O(2)., Conclusions: DODS settings were not equivalent to continuous-flow oxygen in a bench model assessment; with equivalent settings the DODS tended to deliver greater F(I)O(2) than did continuous-flow oxygen. The maximum output capacity differed markedly among the DODS, and the user should know the device's capacity. A volume-referenced setting system for DODS should be adopted that would allow more predictable oxygen prescription and delivery via DODS.