Search

The use of electronic cigarettes has become increasingly popular with claims suggesting healthier alternatives to tobacco cigarettes. However, research regarding the safety of such devices has been limited to an analysis of the inhaled vapor and the short and long-term effects on the body. A lesser recognized risk of electronic cigarette use is that of lithium-ion battery failure causing ignition, leading to severe thermal injury. Such incidents have been reported in the media but with inconsistencies from a lack of focus on the injuries sustained and a cause of ignition. The cases presented here are among the first recognized thermal injuries sustained from electronic cigarette lithium-ion battery failure, the potential rationale for these failures, and a need for increased awareness of the safety hazards of these devices., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.)

Anticoagulation and antiplatelet (ACAP) medications are increasingly prescribed to patients at high risk for falls. Many trauma centers have developed protocols for obtaining repeat head CT (HCT) for patients with low-altitude falls on ACAP therapy. We assess the need for routine scheduled repeat HCT in this population. Prospective, observational analysis of all low-altitude fall (<6 feet) patients on ACAP therapy evaluated at a Level II trauma center. All low-altitude fall patients with visible or suspected head trauma received an initial HCT. Patients were admitted and repeat HCT was obtained 12 hours later or earlier if acute neurologic decline developed. Chi-squared, Fischer exact, t, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. Total of 1501 patients enrolled suffering low-altitude falls with initial HCT. Among them 1379(91.2%) were negative and 122(8.1%) were initially positive for intracranial hemorrhage. Mean age was 79.9 ± 11.4 years, 61 per cent were female and 85 per cent had visible head trauma at presentation. One hundred ninety-nine were excluded secondary to not receiving repeat HCT. Of the 1180 patients with normal initial HCT who underwent repeat HCT, only 7 (0.51%) had delayed intracranial hemorrhage. None of these patients required surgery, major changes in medical management or suffered head trauma-related mortality; 69 per cent were taking aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid, ASA), 19 per cent warfarin, 17 per cent clopidogrel, 6 per cent other anticoagulants, and 11 per cent were on combination therapy. Repeat HCT for patients on any ACAP therapy after low-altitude fall with a negative initial HCT is not necessary. Thorough neurologic examination and close monitoring is as effective as obtaining a repeat HCT.

Background: Resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) has been the standard therapy in patients with acute arrest due to hemorrhagic shock. However, with the development of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), its role as a potential adjunct to a highly morbid intervention such as RT is being discussed. The aim of this study was to identify patients who most likely would have potentially benefited from REBOA use based on autopsy findings., Methods: We performed a 4-year retrospective review of all RTs performed at our Level I trauma center. Patients with in-hospital mortality and who underwent subsequent autopsies were included. Patients were divided into blunt and penetrating trauma with and without thoracic injuries. Autopsy reports were reviewed to identify vascular and solid organ injuries. Outcome measure was potential benefit with REBOA. Potential benefit with REBOA was defined based on the ability to safely deploy REBOA. In patients without cardiac, aortic, and major pulmonary vasculature injuries, REBOA was considered potentially beneficial. In all other patients, it was considered as nonbeneficial., Results: A total of 98 patients underwent an RT, of whom 87 had subsequent autopsies and were reviewed. The mean age was 35.25 (SD, 17.85) years, mean admission systolic blood pressure was 51.38 (SD, 70.11) mm Hg, median Injury Severity Score was 29 (interquartile range [IQR], 25-42), and 44 had penetrating injury. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta would have been potentially beneficial in 51.2% of patients (22 of 43 patients) with blunt mechanism of trauma, whereas REBOA would have been potentially beneficial in 38.6% of patients (17 of 44 patients) with penetrating mechanism of trauma. A subgroup analysis showed that REBOA use would have been potentially beneficial in 50.0% of blunt thoracic and 33.3% of penetrating thoracic trauma patients., Conclusions: There are a great enthusiasm and premature efforts to introduce REBOA as an alternative to RT. While there exists a great potential for benefit with REBOA use in the management of noncompressible torso hemorrhage, the current indications for REBOA need to be defined better. Patients with penetrating chest trauma in extremis should be considered an absolute contraindication for REBOA use. The majority of patients with blunt trauma in extremis may potentially benefit from REBOA. However, better criteria will help increase these patients who may potentially benefit from REBOA placement., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, level V.

Background. Lung injury prediction score (LIPS) is valuable for early recognition of ventilated patients at high risk for developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This study analyzes the value of LIPS in predicting ARDS and mortality among ventilated surgical patients. Methods. IRB approved, prospective observational study including all ventilated patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit at a single tertiary center over 6 months. ARDS was defined using the Berlin criteria. LIPS were calculated for all patients and analyzed. Logistic regression models evaluated the ability of LIPS to predict development of ARDS and mortality. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrated the optimal LIPS value to statistically predict development of ARDS. Results. 268 ventilated patients were observed; 141 developed ARDS and 127 did not. The average LIPS for patients who developed ARDS was 8.8 ± 2.8 versus 5.4 ± 2.8 for those who did not (p < 0.001). An ROC area under the curve of 0.79 demonstrates LIPS is statistically powerful for predicting ARDS development. Furthermore, for every 1-unit increase in LIPS, the odds of developing ARDS increase by 1.50 (p < 0.001) and odds of ICU mortality increase by 1.22 (p < 0.001). Conclusion. LIPS is reliable for predicting development of ARDS and predicting mortality in critically ill surgical patients.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare vasopressor requirements between African American (AA) patients and white patients in septic shock., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort review conducted over a 2-year period measuring total and mean dosage of various vasopressors used between two racial groups during the treatment of patients admitted with septic shock. The study included patients admitted to the intensive care unit with septic shock at an 805-bed tertiary, academic center. All septic shock patients were managed with vasopressors. Vasopressor selection, dosage, and duration were at the discretion of the treating physician. Total, mean, and duration of vasopressor dosing requirements were obtained for study participants. Comorbidities, prehospitalization antihypertensive medication requirements, intravenous fluids given during the septic shock phase, and source of infection were analyzed., Results: One hundred fifty-nine patients with septic shock were analyzed, of which 96 (60.4%) were AAs (P < 0.059). African Americans had higher rates of end-stage renal disease and hypertension compared with whites, 85.7% vs. 14.3% (P < 0.011; odds ratio [OR], 15.684) and 68.3% vs. 31.7% (P < 0.007; OR, 3.357), respectively. Norepinephrine (NE) was administered to 150 patients, 57.2% of which were AAs (P < 0.509). Thirteen patients received dopamine (5% AAs, P < 0.588), 40 patients received phenylephrine (15.7% AAs, P < 0.451), and five patients received epinephrine (1.9% AAs, P < 0.660). Comparing vasopressors between races, only NE showed statistical significance via logistic regression modeling for the AA race in terms of total dosage (AAs 736.8 [SD, 897.3] μg vs. whites 370 [SD, 554.2] μg, P < 0.003), duration of vasopressor used (AAs 38.38 [SD, 34.75] h vs. whites 29.09 [SD, 27.11] h, P < 0.037), and mean dosage (AAs 21.08 [SD, 22.23] μg/h vs. whites 12.37 [SD, 13.86] μg/h, P < 0.01). Mortality between groups was not significant. Logistic regression identified discrepancy of the mean dose NE in AAs compared with whites, with OR of 1.043 (P = 0.01)., Conclusions: African American patients with septic shock were treated with higher doses of NE and required longer duration of NE administration compared with white patients.