Search

Introduction/Aims The virtual cathode (VC) is a site near the anode where the nerve can be stimulated. Costimulation of neighboring nerves via the VC can affect recording and interpretation of responses. Hence, it is important to teach trainees the concept of the VC. The VC has been demonstrated previously with subtle changes in response latency, amplitude, and shape. Herein we describe an experiment that simply demonstrates a VC with its effects recognizable by gross changes in waveforms. Methods Compound muscle action potentials of the abductor pollicis brevis were recorded using various placements of the cathode and anode at different stimulus intensity levels. Studies were performed in nine healthy subjects. Results Three patterns were observed that demonstrated no stimulation, partial stimulation, and complete nerve stimulation by the VC. Partial stimulation yielded responses with long duration and low amplitude. Response patterns also depended on stimulus strength and proximity of the nerve from the skin surface. Discussion This experiment demonstrates that nerve stimulation can occur near the anode when high-intensity stimulus is used. It also illustrates collision of action potentials. This exercise can help trainees understand potential pitfalls in nerve conduction studies, especially at very proximal stimulation sites or when high stimulus intensity is used.

Introduction: In this study we describe a method called "multivariable extrapolated reference values" (MeRef) that derives reference values (RVs) using patient data and includes the dependence of these variables on multiple patient demographic variables, such as age and height. Methods: Computer simulations were used to generate "normal" and "patient" nerve conduction data. Median, ulnar, and tibial motor nerve conduction data from 500 patients studied were tabulated. Data were analyzed using the MeRef method. Results: The simulations showed great similarity between RVs obtained from MeRef of "patient" data and traditional analysis of "normal" data. In the real patient data, MeRef gave RVs as regression equations based on patient age and/or height. Discussion: MeRef can provide RVs by including patient demographic data and does not require subject grouping. It provides parameters of multivariable linear regression and standard deviation, and requires a few hundred patient studies to define reference values.

Introduction In contrast to needle electromyography (EMG), surface EMG recordings are painless. It is of interest to develop methods to analyze surface EMG for diagnostic purposes. Methods Surface EMG interference pattern (SIP) recordings from the abductor pollicis brevis muscle of healthy subjects and subjects with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) were analyzed by measuring root-mean-square (RMS) voltage, mean rectified voltage, form factor (FF), and the clustering index (CI). The FF vs SIP area plot was used for analysis. Results The SIP FF was increased and abnormal in ALS subjects, especially when SIP area was less than 200 mVms. Power regression showed a faster FF decline with SIP area in ALS patients than in healthy subjects. The CI and FF showed a strong correlation. Discussion FF is easy to calculate and demonstrates abnormalities in ALS patients.

Objective: The motor unit size index (MUSIX) is incorporated into the motor unit number index (MUNIX). Our objective was to assess the intra-/inter-rater reliability of MUSIX in healthy volunteers across single subject "round robin" and multi-centre settings. Methods: Data were obtained from (i) a round-robin assessment in which 12 raters (6 with prior experience and 6 without) assessed six muscles (abductor pollicis brevis, abductor digiti minimi, biceps brachii, tibialis anterior, extensor digitorum brevis and abductor hallucis) and (ii) a multi-centre study with 6 centres studying the same muscles in 66 healthy volunteers. Intrafinter-rater data were provided by 5 centres, 1 centre provided only intra-rater data. Intrafinter-rater variability was assessed using the coefficient of variation (COV), Bland-Altman plots, bias and 95% limits of agreement. Results: In the round-robin assessment intra-rater COVs for MUSIX ranged from 7.8% to 28.4%. Inter-rater variability was between 7.8% and 16.2%. Prior experience did not impact on MUSIX values. In the multi-centre study MUSIX was more consistent than the MUNIX. Abductor hallucis was the least reliable muscle. Conclusions: The MUSIX is a reliable neurophysiological biomarker of reinnervation. Significance: MUSIX could provide insights into the pathophysiology of a range of neuromuscular disorders, providing a quantitative biomarker of reinnervation.

Introduction: This study proposes guidelines for motor unit number index (MUNIX) recording and analysis. Methods: MUNIX was measured in control participants and in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Changes in MUNIX values due to E1 electrode position, number of surface electromyography interference pattern (SIP) epochs, SIP epoch duration, force of contraction, and outlier data points were investigated. Results: MUNIX depends on optimized compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude. Individual muscles showed variations when the number of epochs was low or when the SIP duration was short. Longer SIP duration allowed better recognition of artifacts. MUNIX results were affected by SIP values at all force levels but was more affected when SIP area was low. Discussion: We recommend changing the E1 electrode position to maximize CMAP amplitude. Twenty or more SIP signals of 500-ms duration should be recorded by using force levels ranging from slight to maximum. Traces should be reviewed to identify and exclude signals with tremor or solitary spikes.

Purpose:To study disease progression in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), we have developed the cumulative motor index (CMI) using the compound muscle action potential amplitude recorded in multiple upper and lower limb muscles.Methods:To study its reproducibility, CMI was measured by 2 operators in 10 healthy subjects on 2 occasions. In 15 patients with ALS, CMI and ALS functional rating score (revised) were measured at 3- to 6-month interval for 12 months or longer.Results:The CMI had good reproducibility in healthy subjects. In one patient with ALS, CMI and ALS functional rating score (revised) remained relatively unchanged. In all remaining 14 patients with disease progression, CMI decreased in a relatively monotonic manner. At 1 year after baseline study, CMI was reduced more than ALS functional rating score (revised) in 10 patients. CMI measurements were possible for longer time period, than analysis from a single distal muscle recording.Conclusions:The CMI can be measured using standard equipment and software available in most electrodiagnostic laboratories. This may be a simple measurement that can be used for clinical studies of ALS progression over longer time periods.