Search

Acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) represents the Achilles' heel of targeted treatment in lung cancer. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKIs are considered the standard first-line treatment for patients with EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer; however, after a median of 9 to 12 months, virtually all patients develop acquired resistance, which is mediated by the development of an EGFR-T790M secondary mutation in approximately 60% of cases. Different mechanisms of acquired resistance have also been described with lower incidence, including mutations in other driver oncogenes or phenotypic transformation. Herein, we report the first case of a patient with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with a long-lasting response to first-line erlotinib treatment who acquired resistance to treatment because of acquisition of both EGFR-T790M mutation and "high-grade" large cell neuroendocrine transformation. This case also shows how resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib can be mediated by the development of phenotypic neuroendocrine transformation, which in the present case occurred during first-line treatment with erlotinib. In addition, our report highlights the pivotal role of rebiopsy and of molecular profiling at the time of progression to guide clinicians to choose the right therapy for the right patient., (Copyright © 2017 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In this work high throughput technology and computational analysis were used to study two stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with standard chemotherapy with markedly different survival (128 months vs 6 months, respectively) and whose tumor samples exhibit a dissimilar protein activation pattern of the signal transduction. Tumor samples of the two patients were subjected to Reverse Phase Protein Microarray (RPPA) analysis to explore the expression/activation levels of 51 signaling proteins. We selected the most divergent proteins based on the ratio of their RPPA values in the two patients with short (s-OS) and long (l-OS) overall survival (OS) and tested them against a EGFR-IGF1R mathematical model. The model with RPPA data showed that the activation levels of 19 proteins were different in the two patients. The four proteins that most distinguished the two patients were BADS155/136 and c-KITY703/719 having a higher activation level in the patient with short survival and p70S6S371/T389 and b-RAFS445 that had a lower activation level in the s-OS patient. The final model describes the interactions between the MAPK and PI3K-mTOR pathways, including 21 nodes. According to our model mTOR and ERK activation levels were predicted to be lower in the s-OS patient than the l-OS patient, while the AMPK activation level was higher in the s-OS patient. Moreover, KRAS activation was predicted to be higher in the l-OS KRAS -mutated patient. In accordance with their different biological properties, the Moment Independent Robustness Indicator in s-OS and l-OS predicted the interaction of MAPK and mTOR and the crosstalk AKT with p90RSK as candidates to be prognostic factors and drug targets., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

The identification of epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) mutations represented a fundamental step forward in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as they define a subset of patients who benefit from the administration of specifically designed targeted therapies. The inhibition of mutant EGFR through EGFR -tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), either reversible, first-generation gefitinib and erlotinib, or irreversible, second-generation afatinib, has dramatically improved the prognosis of patients harboring this specific genetic alteration, leading to unexpected clinical benefit. Unfortunately, virtually all patients who initially respond to treatment develop acquired resistance to EGFR -TKIs within 9-14 months. The EGFR T790M secondary mutation has emerged as a cause of treatment failure in approximately 60% of resistant cases. To date, several compounds designed with the aim to overcome T790M-mediated resistance are under clinical investigation. The aim of this review is to discuss emerging data regarding the third-generation EGFR -TKI, osimertinib, for the treatment of EGFR T790M mutant advanced NSCLC., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

In the era of personalized medicine, the identification of targetable genetic alterations represented a major step forward in anticancer therapy. NTRK rearrangements represent the molecular driver of a subset of solid tumors, including 3% of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Preliminary data indicate that molecularly selected NSCLC patients harboring NTRK fusions derive an unprecedented clinical benefit from Trk-directed targeted therapies. The aim of this review is to describe the molecular biology of NTRK signaling pathway and to summarize the preclinical data on novel Trk inhibitors, touching upon the clinical development of these inhibitors for the treatment of advanced NSCLC, which have already shown encouraging anticancer activity and acceptable safety profile in early phase I clinical trials.

Introduction: Immune checkpoint blockaders (ICBs) act by unbalancing the immune system, thus favoring the development of an immune-mediated antitumor effect. ICBs targeting the programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) have recently been investigated in a number of advanced tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 kappa directed against PD-1, has been the first ICB to be approved for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Areas covered: In this review we focus on the clinical development of nivolumab for the treatment of advanced NSCLC, with an emphasis on its safety profile. In addition, we summarize the most common types of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with nivolumab, mainly due to organ inflammation secondary to autoimmunity. Expert opinion: Nivolumab is the preferred treatment option for platinum-pretreated advanced NSCLC, having convincingly shown higher efficacy compared with standard docetaxel chemotherapy in phase III trials. The same trials showed far less incidence of either any grade and severe treatment-related AEs with nivolumab compared with chemotherapy. IrAEs associated with nivolumab are rarely severe in intensity, and often resolve with prompt management. Future studies will explore nivolumab in combination strategies with either platinum-based chemotherapy or other ICBs in treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients.

The bovine leukaemia virus (BLV) envelope protein (Env) is synthesized as a polyprotein precursor (gp72) proteolytically cleaved into the mature surface (SU) and transmembrane (TM) glycoproteins. The amino-terminal region of SU contains conformational epitopes F, G and H, which require a glycosylated SU to be recognized by monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) and antibodies from BLV-infected cattle. The SU contains eight asparagine (N) residues that are putative N-glycosylation sites. The N129, N203, N230 and N251 appear involved in carbohydrate binding, play an essential role in the in vitro infection. To determine which sites were actually glycosylated, we generated mutated SU forms, where each N-glycosylation site was changed to alanine (A). Subsequently, these N to A mutations were inserted into the env gene to generate Env mutants. The increase of electrophoretic mobility of EnvA256 and EnvA271 derived SU showed that the asparagine residues N256 and N271 were also glycosylated. ELISA revealed that only the N129 oligosaccharide determined the antigenic conformation of SU. The syncytium formation induced by EnvA129 showed that fusogenic capacity was independent of amino-terminal SU glycan conformational structure. Finally, anti-BLV serum inhibited syncytia formation even with the EnvA129 mutant. The latter inhibition was higher than Env, suggesting that the oligosaccharides could be also involved in the glycan shield for viral escape., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for 80% of all lung cancers. Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) is one of the deadliest cancer-related proteins and plays a pivotal role in the most aggressive and lethal human cancers, including lung adenocarcinoma where it represents one of the most frequently mutated oncogene. Although therapeutic progresses have made an impact over the last decade, median survival for patients with advanced lung cancer remains disappointing, with a 5-year worldwide survival rate of <15%. For more than 20 years it has been recognized that constitutively active signaling downstream of KRAS is a fundamental driver of lung tumorigenesis. However, years of pursuit have failed to yield a drug that can safely curb KRAS activity; up to now no approved therapies exist for KRAS-mutant NSCLC. The aim of this review is to discuss the current knowledge of KRAS-mutated NSCLC, touching upon KRAS clinical relevance as a prognostic and predictive biomarker, with an emphasis on novel therapeutic approaches for the treatment of KRAS-variant NSCLC.

Objectives: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is sensitive to treatment with an ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (-TKI). However, the benefit of sequential treatment with a 2nd ALK-TKI in patients who fail a 1st ALK-TKI has been poorly addressed., Materials and Methods: We collected the data of 69 advanced ALK-positive NSCLCs who were treated with one or more ALK-TKIs at three Italian institutions. The clinical outcome of treatment with an ALK-TKI and the patterns of treatment upon failing a 1st ALK-TKI were recorded., Results: Objective response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (PFS) on a 1st ALK-TKI (mostly crizotinib) were 60.9% and 12 months, respectively. Of the 50 patients who progressed on a 1st ALK-TKI, 22 were further treated with a 2nd ALK-TKI (either ceritinib or alectinib), for whom an ORR of 86.4% and median PFS of 7 months, respectively, were reported. Conversely, 13 patients underwent rapid clinical/radiographic disease progression leading to death shortly after discontinuation of the 1st ALK-TKI, 7 patients were managed with a 1st ALK-TKI beyond progression, and 8 patients transitioned to other systemic treatments (mostly chemotherapy). Post-progression survival (PPS) significantly favored the 22 patients who were sequentially treated with a 2nd ALK-TKI over those who transitioned to other systemic treatments (P=0.03), but not versus those who were treated with a 1st ALK-TKI beyond progression (P=0.89)., Conclusion: Sequential treatment with a 2nd ALK-TKI is effective in patients who fail a 1st ALK-TKI. Continuous ALK-inhibition upon failing a 1st ALK-TKI may be associated with improved clinical outcome., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically changed the prognosis of advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) that harbour specific EGFR activating mutations. However, the efficacy of an EGFR-TKI is limited by the onset of acquired resistance, usually within one year, in virtually all treated patients. Moreover, a small percentage of EGFR-mutant NSCLCs do not respond to an EGFR-TKI, thus displaying primary resistance. At the present time, several mechanisms of either primary and acquired resistance have been elucidated, and new drugs are currently under preclinical and clinical development in order to overcome resistance to treatment. Nevertheless, there still remains much to be thoroughly investigated, as so far research has mainly focused on the role of proteincoding genes involved in resistance to EGFR-TKIs. On the other hand, in line with the data underscoring the relevance of non-coding RNAs in the pathogenesis of lung cancer and modulation of response to systemic therapies, microRNAs (miRNAs) have been supposed to play an important role in resistance to EGFR-TKIs. The aim of this review is to briefly summarise the existing relationship between miRNAs and resistance to EGFR-TKIs, and also focusing on the possible clinical applications of miRNAs in reverting and overcoming such resistance.

Recent advances in the understanding of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) biology have revealed a number of 'targetable' genetic alterations that underlie cancer growth and survival in specific patients subgroups. The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement identifies a population of NSCLCs in whom dysregulation of ALK-tyrosine kinase (-TK) leads to uncontrolled proliferation of cancer cells, thus providing the basis for the therapeutic use of ALK-TK inhibitors (-TKIs) in ALK-rearranged (-positive) disease. Crizotinib was the first ALK-TKI to undergo clinical development in ALK-positive advanced NSCLC, in which it has been shown to greatly outperform the best available chemotherapy regimen in either second- or first-line setting. More recently, the novel second-generation ALK-TKI ceritinib has been shown to be highly active in either crizotinib-pretreated or -naïve population. Nevertheless, as mechanisms of resistance to crizotinib and ALK-TKIs in general are being progressively elucidated, the treatment landscape of ALK-positive NSCLC is expected to evolve rapidly. In the present review we will briefly discuss the current knowledge of ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Also, we will touch upon new developments on drugs/combination regimens aimed at inhibiting the ALK-TK, in an attempt to delineate how treatment of ALK-positive disease may change in the next future., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The discovery that protein-coding genes represent less than 2% of all human genome, and the evidence that more than 90% of it is actively transcribed, changed the classical point of view of the central dogma of molecular biology, which was always based on the assumption that RNA functions mainly as an intermediate bridge between DNA sequences and protein synthesis machinery. Accumulating data indicates that non-coding RNAs are involved in different physiological processes, providing for the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. They are important regulators of gene expression, cellular differentiation, proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and stem cell maintenance. Alterations and disruptions of their expression or activity have increasingly been associated with pathological changes of cancer cells, this evidence and the prospect of using these molecules as diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets, make currently non-coding RNAs among the most relevant molecules in cancer research. In this paper we will provide an overview of non-coding RNA function and disruption in lung cancer biology, also focusing on their potential as diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of developmental screening on the identification of developmental delays, early intervention (EI) referrals, and EI eligibility., Methods: This randomized controlled, parallel-group trial was conducted from December 2008 to June 2010 in 4 urban pediatric practices. Children were eligible if they were <30 months old, term, without congenital malformations or genetic syndromes, not in foster care, and not enrolled in EI. Children were randomized to receive 1 of the following: (1) developmental screening using Ages and Stages Questionnaire-II (ASQ-II and Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) with office staff assistance, (2) developmental screening using ASQ-II and M-CHAT without office staff assistance, or (3) developmental surveillance using age-appropriate milestones at well visits. Outcomes were assessed using an intention-to-treat analysis., Results: A total of 2103 children were enrolled. Most were African-American with family incomes less than $30,000. Children in either screening arm were more likely to be identified with delays (23.0% and 26.8% vs 13.0%; P < .001), referred to EI (19.9% and 17.5% vs 10.2%; P < .001), and eligible for EI services (7.0% and 5.3% vs 3.0%; P < .001) than children in the surveillance arm. Children in the screening arms incurred a shorter time to identification, EI referral, and EI evaluation than children in the surveillance arm., Conclusions: Children who participated in a developmental screening program were more likely to be identified with developmental delays, referred to EI, and eligible for EI services in a timelier fashion than children who received surveillance alone. These results support policies endorsing developmental screening.