Search

The Wechsler Memory Scale-III Index was evaluated in 252 mixed clinical cases.

Confirmatory factor analyses of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition, were undertaken.

The BEST methods based on regression equations are more reliable in predicting premorbid IQ in neurologic patients than the Barona et al method based on demographic information. Two studies show that these two methods overestimate WAIS-R premorbid intelligence by 9 and 5 points, respectively. The BEST-3 approach which uses the three most robust equations is superior to the BEST-11 approach based on the Vanderploeg and Schinka equations in predicting group membership.

The present study examined the sensitivity of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in detecting the frontal lobe dysfunction that occurs with normal aging. Eighty normal, independently living older adults in four age groupings from 50 to 89 were administered the MMSE along with three neurocognitive measures sensitive to frontal lobe functioning. Results revealed age-related cognitive decline on frontal lobe tasks that also was detected by the MMSE. These findings are noteworthy because the MMSE was intended as a measure of gross cognitive status rather than of frontal lobe functioning.

16 right hemisphere and 16 left hemisphere, nonaphasic brain-injured stroke patients were compared with 16 matched normal controls on the verbal and visuospatial paired-associate tasks developed by Stark in 1961 as a partial replication to a more severely impaired population. Right brain-injured patients showed a significant visuospatial deficit and contralateral motor impairment; while left brain-injured patients, screened for aphasia, showed contralateral motor impairment but did not show impairment on the verbal task. Examination of the areas of infract resulting from the cerebrovascular accident in the left-hemisphere patients suggested that the presence of a contralateral motor deficit without verbal impairment results from specific focal occlusions of branches of the middle cerebral artery in this selective group of patients.

Aims: In neuropsychological evaluations, it is often difficult to ascertain whether poor performance on measures of validity is due to poor effort or malingering, or whether there is genuine cognitive impairment. Dunham and Denney created an algorithm to assess this question using the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT). We assessed the ability of their algorithm to detect poor validity versus probable impairment, and concordance of failure on the MSVT with other freestanding tests of performance validity. Methods: Two previously published datasets (n = 153 and n = 641, respectively) from outpatient neuropsychological evaluations were used to test Dunham and Denney's algorithm, and to assess concordance of failure rates with the Test of Memory Malingering and the forced choice measure of the California Verbal Learning Test, two commonly used performance validity tests. Results: In both datasets, none of the four cutoff scores for failure on the MSVT (70%, 75%, 80%, or 85%) identified a poor validity group with proportionally aligned failure rates on other freestanding measures of performance validity. Additionally, the protocols with probable impairment did not differ from those with poor validity on cognitive measures. Conclusions: Despite what appeared to be a promising approach to evaluating failure on the easy MSVT subtests when clinical data are unavailable (as recommended in the advanced interpretation program, or advanced interpretation [AI], of the MSVT), the current findings indicate the AI remains the gold standard for doing so. Future research should build on this effort to address shortcomings in measures of effort in neuropsychological evaluations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The application of the nine-subtest prorated version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III (WAIS-III) in estimating Verbal, Performance, and Full-Scale IQ scores was evaluated in a sample of 278 mixed clinical patients from two Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. The composite reliabilities of the three prorated summary scores, which excluded Comprehension and Picture Arrangement, did not differ from reliabilities from the full WAIS-III. All three prorated IQ summary scores demonstrated good alternate forms reliability with the standard WAIS-III summary scores. Verbal Performance discrepancy scores were accurate for 86% of the cases. The results of this study appear to support the regular use of prorated WAIS-III summary scores in estimating full WAIS-III summary scores. The benefit of this system is that by giving all of the subtests required for the index scores, not only are the index scores derived, but a very close estimation of the summary scores are generated. C 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Clin Psychol 56: 807--811, 2000. Keywords: assessment; intelligence; intelligence testing; IQ; IQ short forms; Wechsler

The purpose of the current study was to compare three potential profiles of the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT; Pass, Genuine Memory Impairment Profile [GMIP], and Fail) on other freestanding and embedded performance validity tests (PVTs). Notably, a quantitatively computed version of the GMIP was utilized in this investigation. Data obtained from veterans referred for a neuropsychological evaluation in a metropolitan Veteran Affairs medical center were included (N = 494). Individuals age 65 and older were not included to exclude individuals with dementia from this investigation. The sample revealed 222 (45%) in the Pass group. Of the 272 who failed the easy subtests of the MSVT, 221 (81%) met quantitative criteria for the GMIP and 51 (19%) were classified as Fail. The Pass group failed fewer freestanding and embedded PVTs and obtained higher raw scores on all PVTs than both GMIP and Fail groups. The differences in performances of the GMIP and Fail groups were minimal. Specifically, GMIP protocols failed fewer freestanding PVTs than the Fail group; failure on embedded PVTs did not differ between GMIP and Fail. The MSVT GMIP incorporates the presence of clinical correlates of disability to assist with this distinction, but future research should consider performances on other freestanding measures of performance validity to differentiate cognitive impairment from invalidity. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objective: The influence of demographic variables on the Trail Making Test (TMT) performance in older individuals and empirical findings on clinical validity in predementia states, such as Parkinson’s disease mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI), are limited. The principal aim of this study was to add normative data for the Czech population of older adults and explore the clinimetric properties between PD-MCI and PD patients with normal cognition (PD-NC).Method:The study included 125 PD patients classified as 77 PD-MCI and 48 PD-NC and 528 older individuals (60–74 years, further subdivided for normative tables into 60–64, 65–69 and 70–74 age groups) and very old individuals (aged 75–96, further subdivided into 75–79, 80–84, 85–96) cognitively intact Czech adults.Results:Mostly age, to a lesser extent education but not gender, was associated with most TMT basic and derived indices (TMT-B – A). However, the ratio of TMT-B/TMT-A was independent of both age and education. We provide correspondingT-scores that minimize the effect of demographic variables. The results showed a high discriminative validity of TMT basic and derived indices for the differentiation of PD-MCI from PD-NC (allp < .05). The classification accuracy for the differentiation of PD-MCI from controls was optimal for the TMT-B only (80% area under the curve) based on norm adjusted scores. The classification accuracy of the TMT for PD-MCI vs. PD-NC was suboptimal.Conclusions: The cut-offs and normative standards are useful in clinical practice for those working with PD patients and very old adults. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objective: This study explored the utility of combining data from measures of performance validity and symptom validity among Veterans undergoing neuropsychological evaluation for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Background: Persistent cognitive impairments following mTBI are often reported by returning combat veterans. However, objectively-measured cognitive deficits are not common among individuals with mTBI, raising the question of whether negative impression management influences self-ratings. Methods: Self-report ratings were obtained for memory, concentration, decision-making, and processing speed/organization using a 5-point scale ranging from 'none' to 'very severe'. Veterans also completed brief neuropsychological testing which included measures of performance validity. Results: Study 1 examined data from 122 participants and demonstrated that veterans reporting a 'very severe' cognitive deficit were over three times as likely to demonstrate poor effort on a validity test than those without a very severe rating. Study 2 replicated these findings in an independent sample of 127 veterans and also demonstrated that both severity of self-report ratings and performance on an embedded measure of effort were predictive of poor effort on a stand-alone performance validity test. Conclusion: Veterans with suspected mTBI who report 'very severe' cognitive impairment have a greater likelihood of putting forth sub-optimal effort on objective testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]