51. Assessing the Feasibility of an Alternative Payment Model for Mohs Micrographic Surgery at an Academic Center.
- Author
-
Auh S, Chitgopeker P, Hammel J, Ferguson N, Johnson-Jahangir H, and Van Beek M
- Subjects
- Academic Medical Centers economics, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Clinical Laboratory Techniques economics, Clinical Laboratory Techniques methods, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Dermatologic Surgical Procedures economics, Episode of Care, Feasibility Studies, Female, Health Care Costs, Hospital Costs, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Perioperative Care economics, Plastic Surgery Procedures economics, Retrospective Studies, Skin pathology, Specimen Handling economics, United States, Medicare economics, Mohs Surgery economics, Patient Care Bundles economics, Skin Neoplasms economics, Skin Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Background: Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a cost-effective treatment for nonmelanoma skin cancer that bundles costs for surgical excision, tissue processing, and histopathological interpretation. A comprehensive MMS bundle would include all aspects of an episode of care (EOC), including costs of reconstruction, preoperative, and postoperative care., Objective: To assess the feasibility of an alternative payment model for MMS and reconstruction., Methods: Retrospective chart review and payment analysis for 848 consecutive patients with 1,056 tumors treated with MMS. Average Medicare payment of an EOC was compared with bundles based on specific repair types., Results: The bundle for a flap/graft repair averaged $1,028.08 (confidence interval [CI] 95% $951.37-1,104.79), whereas the bundle for a linear closure (LC) averaged $585.07 (CI 95% $558.75-611.38). The average bundle including all repairs was $730.05 (CI 95% $692.31-767.79), which was statistically significant from both the flap/graft and LC bundles., Conclusion: Bundling surgical repairs with MMS based on an average payment does not represent the heterogeneity of the care provided and results in either underpayment or overpayment for a substantial portion of cases. Consequently, EOC payments bundling MMS and surgical repairs would inaccurately reimburse physicians for work completed. Current payment methodology allows for accurate payment for this already cost-effective therapy., (Copyright © 2019 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF