Search

Drug discrimination procedures typically provide for multiple choice opportunities per training session. This practice allows non-drug cues (presence or absence of reinforcement) to mediate choice behavior during that portion of the session following the initial choice. In this experiment, rats were trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg cyclazocine from saline using a novel procedure that employed a single-choice trial per training session. Drug discrimination acquisition and generalization were compared to those of rats given discrimination training with 30 choice trials per session. The one-trial procedure yielded stable and reliable acquisition but more slowly than did the multiple trials procedure. The one-trial procedure produced longer first trial choice latencies and enhanced the tendency for subjects to respond on both choice levers during the first trial. The cyclazocine generalization functions were comparable, but the one-trial subjects more often responded on both choice levers, particularly when administered intermediate test doses of cyclazocine. Control of choice behavior by the reinforcer cue was evaluated on a mid-session cue reversal test. Multiple-trial subjects persisted in responding on the saline level following a mid-session injection of cyclazocine, whereas one-trial subjects shifted to the cyclazocine-appropriate lever.

Phencyclidine (PCP), haloperidol, and naloxone were administered alone and in combination to rats responding under a fixed-interval schedule for water presentation. Lower doses of PCP (0.25–2.0 mg/kg) and naloxone (0.001–0.1 mg/kg) produced increases while higher doses produced dose-dependent decreases in response rate. Haloperidol (0.0625–0.5 mg/kg) produced a monotonic dose-dependent decrease in responding. When a dose of naloxone (8.0 mg/kg) that did not alter responding was administered prior to the PCP, the PCP dose-response curve was shifted to 6.5-fold lower doses of PCP. When a dose of haloperidol (0.0625 mg/kg) that did not alter responding was administered prior to the PCP, the PCP dose-response curve was shifted to 1.5-fold higher dose of PCP. These observations are discussed in relation to current views of the mechanism of PCP action.

Training pigeons with random presentations of a tone and food proactively interferes with the acquisition of autoshaped keypecking to a lighted key. The interference effect is context-specific (observed only when testing for autoshaping occurs in the initial training environment). An interpretation based on blocking by background cues is suggested by the data.

Thirty pigeons were given variable interval training to peck a 555-nm. light and then were tested for wavelength generalization. The subjects were later assigned to 1 of 3 groups, matched for both relative generalization slope and response rate. One group then received successive discrimination training between the 555-nm. stimulus (S+) and a vertical white line on a 555-nm. background (S minus); another group experienced the same S+ but a vertical white line on a black background as S minus. A third group received a comparable amount of single stimulus training with the 555-nm. value. On a second wavelength generalization test, the first group yielded greater sharpening of generalization than the second group, whereas the third group showed no change from Test 1. These results indicate that the sharpening of generalization gradients by discrimination training is directly related to the similarity of the discrimination training stimuli.