51. Simulation of Wellbore Drilling Energy Saving of Nanofluids Using an Experimental Taylor–Couette Flow System
- Author
-
Ahmad Sedaghat, Alibek Issakhov, Koshy Vaidyan, Joshuva Arockia Dhanraj, Seyed Amir Abbas Oloomi, Mohammad Sabati, Khalid Almutairi, Seyyed Shahabaddin Hosseini Dehshiri, Ali Mostafaeipour, Biltayib Misbah, Mahdi Ashtian Malayer, and Masoud Rashidi
- Subjects
Petroleum engineering ,Turbulence ,business.industry ,020209 energy ,05 social sciences ,Taylor–Couette flow ,Fossil fuel ,Rotational speed ,Laminar flow ,02 engineering and technology ,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology ,Power (physics) ,General Energy ,Nanofluid ,0502 economics and business ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,050207 economics ,business ,Voltage - Abstract
Power consumption of wellbore drilling in oil and gas exploitations count for 40% of total costs, hence power saving of WBM (water-based mud) by adding different concentrations of Al2O3, TiO2 and SiO2 nanoparticles is investigated here. A high-speed Taylor–Couette system (TCS) was devised to operate at speeds 0–1600 RPM to simulate power consumption of wellbore drilling using nanofluids in laminar to turbulent flow conditions. The TCS control unit uses several sensors to record current, voltage and rotational speed and Arduino microprocessors to process outputs including rheological properties and power consumption. Total power consumption of the TCS was correlated with a second-order polynomial function of rotational speed for different nanofluids, and the correlated parameters were found using an optimization technique. For the first time, energy saving of three nanofluids at four low volume concentrations 0.05, 0.1, 0.5 and 1% is investigated in the TCS simulating wellbore drilling operation. It is interesting to observe that the lower concentration nanofluids (0.05%) have better power savings. In average, for the lower concentration nanofluids (0.05%), power was saved by 39%, 30% and 26% for TiO2, Al2O3 and SiO2 WBM nanofluids, respectively. TiO2 nanofluids have better power saving at lower concentrations of 0.05 and 0.1%, while Al2O3 nanofluids have saved more power at higher concentrations of 0.5 and 1.0% compared with their counterpart nanofluids.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF