51. The uneven weight distribution between predators and prey: Comparing gut fill between terrestrial herbivores and carnivores
- Author
-
Daryl Codron, Andrew J. Abraham, Annelies De Cuyper, Carlo Meloro, Dennis W. H. Müller, Marcus Clauss, Geert Janssens, University of Zurich, and Clauss, Marcus
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Dietary Fiber ,10253 Department of Small Animals ,1303 Biochemistry ,Range (biology) ,Physiology ,Metabolizable Energy ,Carnivora ,01 natural sciences ,Biochemistry ,Retention time ,Predation ,Nutritional Ecology ,Body Size ,Carnivore ,Predator ,Trophic level ,Motility Capsule System ,0303 health sciences ,630 Agriculture ,Consumer ,Prey ,Body size ,Nutrient Intake ,Gut Fill/content ,Different-sized Particles ,Digestion ,Retention Time ,Gut fill/content ,Food Chain ,Biology ,010603 evolutionary biology ,03 medical and health sciences ,QH301 ,Animal science ,Species Specificity ,1312 Molecular Biology ,Animals ,Dry matter ,Veterinary Sciences ,Herbivory ,Molecular Biology ,030304 developmental biology ,Herbivore ,QL ,Body Weight ,Body-mass ,Biology and Life Sciences ,1314 Physiology ,Feeding Behavior ,Feed Consumption ,QP ,Diet ,Gastrointestinal Tract ,Predatory Behavior ,570 Life sciences ,biology ,Gastrointestinal Transit Times ,Digesta Retention - Abstract
The general observation that secondary consumers ingest highly digestible food and have simple short guts and small abdominal cavities intuitively results in the assumption that mammalian carnivores carry less digesta in their gut compared to herbivores. Due to logistic constraints, this assumption has not been tested quantitatively so far. In this contribution, we estimated the dry matter gut contents (DMC) for 25 species of the order Carnivora (including two strictly herbivorous ones, the giant and the red panda) using the physical 'Occupancy Principle', based on a literature data collection on dry matter intake (DMI), apparent dry matter digestibility (aD DM) and retention time (RT), and compared the results to an existing collection for herbivores. Scaling exponents with body mass (BM) for both carnivores and herbivores were in the same range with DMI similar to BM0.75; aD DM similar to BM0; RT similar to BM0.11 and DMC similar to BM0.88. The trophic level (carnivore vs herbivore) significantly affected all digestive physiology parameters except for RT. Numerically, the carnivore DMI level reached 77%, the RT 32% and DMC only 29% of the corresponding herbivore values, whereas the herbivore aD DM only reached 82% of that of carnivores. Thus, we quantitatively show that carnivores carry less inert mass or gut content compared to herbivores, which putatively benefits them in predator-prey interactions and might have contributed to the evolution towards unguligradism in herbivores. As expected, the two panda species appeared as outliers in the dataset with low aD DM and RT for a herbivore but extremely high DMI values, resulting in DMC in the lower part of the herbivore range. Whereas the difference in DMI and DMC scaling in herbivores might allow larger herbivores to compensate for lower diet quality by ingesting more, this difference may allow larger carnivores not to go for less digestible prey parts, but mainly to increase meal intervals, i.e. not having to hunt on a daily basis.
- Published
- 2020