Search

The strongest genetic risk factor for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been known as HLA-DRB1 based on amino acid positions 11, 71, and 74. This study analyzed the association between specific HLA-DRB1 locus and treatment response to abatacept or TNF inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with seropositive RA. A total of 374 Korean RA patients were treated with abatacept (n = 110) or TNFi (n = 264). Associations between HLA-DRB1 and treatment response after 6 months were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Seropositive RA patients with HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) had a favorable response to abatacept (OR = 3.67, P = 0.067) and an inversely associated response to TNFi (OR 0.57, P = 0.058) based on EULAR response criteria, but the difference was not statistically significant in comparison to those without SE. In analyses using amino acid positions of HLA-DRB1, a significant association was found between valine at amino acid position 11 of SE and good response to abatacept (OR = 6.46, P = 5.4 × 10 -3 ). The VRA haplotype also showed a good response to abatacept (OR = 4.56, P = 0.013), but not to TNFi. Our results suggest that treatment response to abatacept or TNFi may differ depending on HLA-DRB1 locus in seropositive RA, providing valuable insights for selecting optimal therapy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Myocardial infarction (MI) is irreversible damage to the myocardial tissue caused by prolonged ischemia/hypoxia, subsequently leading to loss of contractile function and myocardial damage. However, after a perilous period, ischemia-reperfusion (IR) itself causes the generation of oxygen free radicals, disturbance in cation homeostasis, depletion of cellular energy stores, and activation of innate and adaptive immune responses. The present study employed Abatacept (ABT), which is an anti-inflammatory drug, originally used as an antirheumatic response agent. To investigate the cardioprotective potential of ABT, primarily, the dose was optimized in a chemically induced model of myocardial necrosis. Thereafter, ABT optimized the dose of 5 mg/kg s.c. OD was investigated for its cardioprotective potential in a surgical model of myocardial IR injury, where animals ( n  = 30) were randomized into five groups: Sham, IR-C, Telmi10 + IR (Telmisartan, 10 mg/kg oral OD), ABT5 + IR, ABT perse . ABT and telmisartan were administered for 21 days. On the 21st day, animals were subjected to LAD coronary artery occlusion for 60 min, followed by reperfusion for 45 min. Further, the cardioprotective potential was assessed through hemodynamic parameters, oxidant-antioxidant biochemical enzymatic parameters, cardiac injury, inflammatory markers, histopathological analysis, TUNEL assay, and immunohistochemical evaluation, followed by immunoblotting to explore signaling pathways. The statistics were performed by one-way analysis of variance, followed by the Tukey comparison post hoc tests. Noteworthy, 21 days of ABT pretreatment amended the hemodynamic and ventricular functions in the rat models of MI. The cardioprotective potential of ABT is accompanied by inhibiting MAP kinase signaling and modulating Nrf-2/HO-1 proteins downstream signaling cascade. Overall, the present work bolsters the previously known anti-inflammatory role of ABT in MI and contributes a mechanistic insight and application of clinically approved drugs in averting the activation of inflammatory response., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest between the authors., (Copyright © 2024 Vipin Kumar Verma et al.)

Abatacept (ABT) is a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARDs) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when conventional synthetic DMARDs are ineffective. We aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of ABT on joint destruction in patients treated for over 2 years. Radiographic progression was evaluated using the van der Heijde-modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) by two rheumatologists at ABT initiation and after 2 years. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with structural remission, defined as the mean annual change in mTSS ≤0.5. Among the 111 patients included, 48 discontinued, and 63 continued ABT treatment until radiographic evaluation was performed. The rate of patients who achieved estimated TSS REM (yearly progression of van der Heijde modified total Sharp scores ≤0.5) was significantly lower in ABT-dropouts than in the ABT-continued group (69% vs. 48%, p  = .0336 by Fisher's exact test). Among the continued ABT cases, concomitant glucocorticoid treatment at ABT initiation was the strongest negative predictive factor of estimated TSS REM in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Radiographic progression after ABT administration should be evaluated separately for dropout and non-dropout cases. Glucocorticoids at the initiation of ABT may serve as a predictive factor for joint destruction in long-term ABT use.

Objective: The optimal strategy for difficult-to-treat (D2T) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has not been identified, and the ultrasound characteristics of D2T RA have not been reported. We investigated the clinical characteristics and factors contributing to the outcome in D2T RA in a multicentre RA ultrasound observational cohort., Method: We reviewed 307 Japanese patients diagnosed with RA who underwent treatment with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). We compared the differences in patient characteristics between the D2T RA and non-D2T RA groups. We examined the factors contributing to a good response [defined as b/tsDMARD continuation and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤ 10 at 12 months] in the D2T RA patient group., Results: Forty-three patients (14%) were categorized as D2T RA and the remaining 264 (86%) as non-D2T RA at baseline. The grey-scale (GS) score, disease duration, and CDAI at the initiation of treatment were significantly higher in the D2T RA group than in the non-D2T RA group. In contrast, the power Doppler (PD) score was not significantly different between the two groups. Of the 43 D2T RA patients, 20 achieved a good response. The introduction of CTLA4-Ig (n = 5) was significantly associated with a good response in analysis based on inverse probability weighting with propensity score. GS and PD scores at baseline were not significantly associated with therapeutic response at 12 months in D2T RA patients., Conclusions: Patients with D2T RA had high clinical and ultrasound activity and poor responses to treatment with b/tsDMARDs. CTLA4-Ig was associated with a good response at 12 months in D2T RA patients.

Background: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the leading cause of death beyond the first year after lung transplantation. The development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is a recognized risk factor for CLAD. Based on experience in kidney transplantation, we hypothesized that belatacept, a selective T-cell costimulatory blocker, would reduce the incidence of DSA after lung transplantation, which may ameliorate the risk of CLAD., Methods: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) at 2 sites to assess the feasibility and inform the design of a large-scale RCT. All participants were treated with rabbit antithymocyte globulin for induction immunosuppression. Participants in the control arm were treated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone, and participants in the belatacept arm were treated with tacrolimus, belatacept, and prednisone through day 89 after transplant then converted to belatacept, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone for the remainder of year 1., Results: After randomizing 27 participants, 3 in the belatacept arm died compared with none in the control arm. As a result, we stopped enrollment and treatment with belatacept, and all participants were treated with standard-of-care immunosuppression. Overall, 6 participants in the belatacept arm died compared with none in the control arm (log rank P  = 0.008). We did not observe any differences in the incidence of DSA, acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, CLAD, or infections between the 2 groups., Conclusions: We conclude that the investigational regimen used in this pilot RCT is associated with increased mortality after lung transplantation., Competing Interests: M.A. is on the scientific advisory board of Immunocoer and One Lambda. V.P. is a consultant for PrecisCa. D.K. is on the scientific advisory board of Sana Biotechnology. R.H. received grant funding from Bristol Myers Squibb. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We investigated methotrexate safety and the influence of dose on efficacy outcomes in combination with three different biologic treatments and with active conventional treatment (ACT) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: This post hoc analysis included 812 treatment-naïve patients with early RA who were randomized (1:1:1:1) in the NORD-STAR trial to receive methotrexate in combination with ACT, certolizumab-pegol, abatacept, or tocilizumab. Methotrexate safety, doses, and dose effects on Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission were assessed after 24 weeks of treatment., Results: Compared with ACT, the prevalence of methotrexate-associated side effects was higher when methotrexate was combined with tocilizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-1.84) but not with certolizumab-pegol (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.79-1.23) or with abatacept (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.75-1.16). With ACT as the reference, the methotrexate dose was significantly lower when used in combination with tocilizumab (β -4.65, 95% CI -5.83 to -3.46; P < 0.001) or abatacept (β -1.15, 95% CI -2.27 to -0.03; P = 0.04), and it was numerically lower in combination with certolizumab-pegol (β -1.07, 95% CI -2.21 to 0.07; P = 0.07). Methotrexate dose reductions were not associated with decreased CDAI remission rates within any of the treatment combinations., Conclusion: Methotrexate was generally well tolerated in combination therapies, but adverse events were a limiting factor in receiving the target dose of 25 mg/wk, and these were more frequent in combination with tocilizumab versus ACT. On the other hand, methotrexate dose reductions were not associated with decreased CDAI remission rates within any of the four treatment combinations at 24 weeks., (© 2023 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: We compared the incidence rates of hospitalized infections (HIs) between tocilizumab (TCZ) and other biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in adults aged ≥75 years with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: We used a Japanese claims database from Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) to perform a retrospective longitudinal population-based study in patients with RA who were prescribed b/tsDMARDs between 2014 and 2019. We calculated adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) for HIs in three age groups (<65, ≥65 and <75, and ≥75 years)., Results: Of 5506 patients, 2265 (41.1%) were <65 years, 1709 (31.0%) were 65-74 years, and 1532 (27.8%) were ≥75 years. Crude incidence rates (/100 person-years) of HIs were 3.99, 7.27, and 10.77, respectively. In the oldest group, aRRs (95% confidence interval) for HIs (b/tsDMARDs versus TCZ) were as follows: etanercept, 2.40 (1.24-4.61); adalimumab, 1.90 (0.75-4.83); golimumab, 1.21 (0.66-2.23); and abatacept, 0.89 (0.49-1.62). In the other age groups, the noticeable difference was a lower aRR of etanercept versus TCZ in the youngest group (0.30, 0.11-0.85)., Conclusion: In patients with RA aged ≥75 years, b/tsDMARDs have a similar risk of HIs to tocilizumab except for etanercept., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Objectives: The aim of the article is to investigate the associations of disease duration and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) status with the effectiveness of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: We performed post hoc analyses of the Orencia® Registry in Geographically Assembled Multicenter Investigation (ORIGAMI) study of biologic-naïve RA patients aged ≥20 years with moderate disease activity who were prescribed abatacept. Changes in the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) at 4, 24, and 52 weeks of treatment were analysed in patients divided according to ACPA serostatus (positive/negative), disease duration (<1/≥1 year), or both., Results: SDAI scores decreased from baseline in all groups. SDAI scores tended to decrease more in the ACPA-positive group and disease duration <1-year group than in the ACPA-negative group and disease duration ≥1-year group, respectively. In the disease duration <1-year group, SDAI tended to decrease more in the ACPA-positive group than in the ACPA-negative group. Disease duration was independently associated with the change in SDAI and SDAI remission at Week 52 in multivariable regression models., Conclusions: These results suggest that starting abatacept within 1 year of diagnosis was associated with greater effectiveness of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with RA and moderate disease activity., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Objectives: Obesity is associated with lower treatment response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In patients with obesity, abatacept was suggested as a preferable option to tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors. We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of etanercept, infliximab and abatacept, compared with adalimumab, in patients with RA with obesity. Secondarily, we also investigated this in patients with overweight and normal weight for completeness., Design: Observational cohort study., Setting: Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases (SCQM) registry (1997-2019)., Participants: Adult patients with RA from the SCQM registry who received etanercept, infliximab, abatacept or adalimumab as their first biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug were classified based on their body mass index (BMI) at the start of that treatment in three cohorts: obese, overweight, normal weight. They were followed for a maximum of 1 year., Exposure: The study exposure of interest was the patients' first biological, particularly: etanercept, infliximab and abatacept, compared with adalimumab., Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: The primary study outcome was remission within 12 months, defined as 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) <2.6. Missingness was addressed using confounder-adjusted response rate with attrition correction. Logistic regression was used to compare the effectiveness of etanercept, infliximab and abatacept versus adalimumab. Each BMI cohort was addressed and analysed separately., Results: The study included 443 obese, 829 overweight and 1243 normal weight patients with RA. There were no statistically significant differences in the odds of DAS28-remission at ≤12 months for etanercept, infliximab and abatacept, compared with adalimumab, in any of the BMI cohorts., Conclusions: No differences in DAS28-remission were found between the study drugs and adalimumab as first biologic in patients with RA, independently of the BMI cohort. We did not find evidence that treatment with abatacept increased the likelihood of remission compared with adalimumab among obese patients with RA., Competing Interests: Competing interests: EV-Y, TB and AMB declare no competing interests. AF received funding from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos and Pfizer to the Geneva University Hospital, and consultancies or honoraria from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli-Lilly, MSD and Pfizer to the Geneva University Hospital., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: Machine learning models can support an individualized approach in the choice of bDMARDs. We developed prediction models for 5 different bDMARDs using machine learning methods based on patient data derived from the Austrian Biologics Registry (BioReg)., Methods: Data from 1397 patients and 19 variables with at least 100 treat-to-target (t2t) courses per drug were derived from the BioReg biologics registry. Different machine learning algorithms were trained to predict the risk of ineffectiveness for each bDMARD within the first 26 weeks. Cross-validation and hyperparameter optimization were applied to generate the best models. Model quality was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). Using explainable AI (XAI), risk-reducing and risk-increasing factors were extracted., Results: The best models per drug achieved an AUROC score of the following: abatacept, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54-0.78); adalimumab, 0.70 (95% CI, 0.68-0.74); certolizumab, 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.89); etanercept, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.55-0.87); tocilizumab, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69-0.77). The most risk-increasing variables were visual analytic scores (VAS) for abatacept and etanercept and co-therapy with glucocorticoids for adalimumab. Dosage was the most important variable for certolizumab and associated with a lower risk of non-response. Some variables, such as gender and rheumatoid factor (RF), showed opposite impacts depending on the bDMARD., Conclusion: Ineffectiveness of biological drugs could be predicted with promising accuracy. Interestingly, individual parameters were found to be associated with drug responses in different directions, indicating highly complex interactions. Machine learning can be of help in the decision-process by disentangling these relations., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients seropositive for hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) and negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) are at risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation when treated with biologic or targeted synthetic (b/ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The study aims to investigate the risk in this population., Methods: From January 2004 through December 2020, 1068 RA patients undergoing b/tsDMARDs therapy and 416 patients with HBsAg-/HBcAb+ were enrolled. Factors associated with HBV reactivation were analysed., Results: During 2845 person-years of follow-up, 27 of 416 (6.5%,9.5 per 1000 person-years) patients developed HBV reactivation, with a cumulative rate of HBV reactivation of 3.5% at 5 years, 6.1% at 10 years and 24.2% at 17 years. The median interval from beginning b/tsDMARDs to HBV reactivation was 85 months (range: 9-186 months). The risk of HBV reactivation varied by type of b/tsDMARD, with rituximab having the highest risk (incidence rate: 48.3 per 1000 person-years), followed by abatacept (incidence rate: 24.0 per 1000 person-years). In multivariate analysis, rituximab (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 15.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.12-60.32, p = .001), abatacept (aHR: 9.30, 1.83-47.19, p = .007), adalimumab (aHR: 3.86, 1.05-14.26, p = .04) and negative baseline HBV surface antibody (anti-HBs, <10 mIU/mL) (aHR: 3.89, 1.70-8.92, p < .001) were independent risk factors for HBV reactivation., Conclusion: HBsAg-/HBcAb+ RA patients are susceptible to HBV reactivation during b/tsDMARD therapy. Those with negative baseline anti-HBs and those on certain b/tsDMARDs, such as rituximab, abatacept and adalimumab, have high reactivation risks. Risk stratification and management should be based on the patient's baseline anti-HBs titre and type of therapy., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a major risk factor for osteoporosis/osteoporotic fractures. We aimed to elucidate the role of treatment choices among osteoporosis/osteoporotic fractures., Methodology: We utilized the Chang-Gung Research Database to assess the risks of osteoporosis/osteoporotic fractures among independently treated RA patients, using retrospective time-to-event outcomes analysis., Results: A total of 3509 RA patients with a mean of 63.1 ± 8.6 years were analyzed. Among all, 1300 RA patients (37%) were diagnosed with newly diagnosed osteoporosis. The crude incidence of newly diagnosed osteoporosis was the highest among those treated with other conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs; 74.1 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 66.0-82.3), followed by those with a non-treatment period (68 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 63.1-72.9), methotrxate (MTX) monotherapy (60.7 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 41.2-80.3), MTX plus other cDMARDs (51.9 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 43.4-60.3), and abatacept/rituximab (48.6 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 14.9-82.3). The lowest crude incidence was found in patients treated with anti-TNFi biologics (40.4 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 28.6-52.2) and other biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs; 40.1 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 8.0-72.1). A total of 270 patients (20.8%) suffered from an incident fracture during follow-ups. The crude incidence of fracture was the highest among those treated with abatacept/rituximab (49.0 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 6.0-91.9), followed by those with non-treatment periods (24.3 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 19.3-29.4), other cDMARDs (24.2 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 18.1-30.2), anti-TNFi biologics (20.2 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 8.8-31.6). Other bDMARDs (13.3 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 0-39.2), MTX mono (12.5 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 0.3-24.8), and MTX plus other cDMARDs (11.4 events/1000-PYs, 95%CI 5.4-17.4) were low incidences., Conclusion: The treatment option has emerged as a critical determinant in the context of future osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture risks among RA. These findings offer a valuable resource for clinicians, empowering them to tailor bespoke treatment strategies for RA patients, thereby mitigating the potential for future osteoporosis and fractures., (© 2024 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: To compare persistence of disease-modifying antirheumatic (DMARDs), with a focus on Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in Australian rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients., Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted among 4,521 RA patients (females n=3,181 [70.4%]), using data from the Services Australia 10% Pharmaceuticals Benefits Scheme (PBS) dataset, aged ≥18 years and initiating a DMARD between 2011 to 2021. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate persistence rates, defined as occurrence of 6 months gap after the end of a drug dispensing., Results: Twelve-month persistence rates were 72% for upadacitinib, 61% for baricitinib, 58% for subcutaneous tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi), 55% for tocilizumab, 53% for tofacitinib, and 49% for abatacept. Median treatment persistence was not reached for upadacitinib (n=574) and baricitinib (n=553); and was 15.0 months for tofacitinib (95% CI 13.5-19.5), 20.5 months for TNFi (95% CI 19.0-22.4), 19.1 months for tocilizumab (95% CI 17.9-23.6), and 12.5 months for abatacept (95% CI 10.4-14.9). Persistence rates on first-line JAK inhibitors were 68% for upadacitinib and baricitinib and 55% for tofacitinib, and 49% for TNFi, 55% for abatacept, and 57% for tocilizumab; rates were sustained for upadacitinib, TNFi, and tocilizumab but dropped to 59% for baricitinib and 47% for abatacept in the second-line treatment. For each b/tsDMARD, persistence rates were higher when combined with methotrexate or other conventional synthetic DMARDs. The median oral glucocorticoid dose decreased from 4.3 mg/day (range:0-40) to 2.3 mg/day (range:0-22) over 2 years. Changes were significant for all RA DMARDs, tofacitinib and baricitinib combined (1-2 years post initiation only), TNFi, abatacept, and tocilizumab., Conclusions: In a real-world setting, we showed highest persistence rates on upadacitinib, followed by baricitinib and then TNFi therapy and was improved by co-therapy. All agents appeared to be corticosteroid sparing., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest This work was supported by Pfizer (ASPIRE Rheumatology Grant 2020) and Dr. Scheepers received a fellowship from The Trustee for Farrell Foundation (2020-2021). All authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Desensitization is one of the strategies to reduce antibodies and facilitate heart transplantation in highly sensitized patients. We describe our center's desensitization experience with combination of plasma cell (PC) depletion therapy (with proteasome inhibitor or daratumumab) and costimulation blockade (with belatacept)., Methods: We reviewed five highly sensitized patients who underwent desensitization therapy with plasma cell depletion and costimulation blockade. We evaluated the response to therapy by measuring the changes in cPRA, average MFI, and number of positive beads > 5000MFI., Results: Five patients, mean age of 56 (37-66) years with average cPRA of 98% at 5000 MFI underwent desensitization therapy. After desensitization, mean cPRA decreased from 98% to 70% (p = .09), average number of beads > 5000 MFI decreased from 59 to 37 (p = .15), and average MFI of beads > 5000 MFI decreased from 16713 to 13074 (p = .26)., Conclusion: Combined PC depletion and CoB could be a reasonable strategy for sustained reduction in antibodies in highly sensitized patients being listed for heart transplantation., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Solid organ transplant donor-recipient eplet mismatch has been correlated with donor-specific antibody (DSA) formation, antibody-mediated rejection, and overall rejection rates. However, studies have been predominantly in patients on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression regimens and have not fully explored differences in ethnically and racially diverse populations. Evidence indicates that patients on belatacept have lower rates of DSA formation, suggesting mediation of the immunogenicity of mismatched human leukocyte antigen polymorphisms. We performed a retrospective, single-center analysis of class II eplet disparity in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients treated using belatacept with tacrolimus induction (Bela/Tac TL ) or tacrolimus regimens between 2016 and 2019. Bela/Tac TL (n = 294) and tacrolimus (n = 294) cohorts were propensity score-matched with standardized difference <0.15. Single-molecule eplet risk level was associated with immune event rates for both groups. In Cox regression analysis stratified by eplet risk level, Bela/Tac TL immunosuppression was associated with a decreased rate of DSA (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.4), antibody-mediated rejection (HR = 0.2), and rejection (HR = 0.45). In the low-risk group, cumulative graft failure was lower for patients on Bela/Tac TL (P < .02). Analysis of eplet mismatch burden may be a useful adjunct in identifying high-risk populations with increased immunosuppression requirements and should encourage the design of allocation rules to incentivize lower-risk pairings without negatively impacting equity in access., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 American Society of Transplantation & American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Belatacept, a modified form of CTLA-Ig that blocks CD28-mediated co-stimulation of T cells, is an immune-suppressant that can be used as an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). In kidney transplant recipients, belatacept has been associated with improved renal function and reduced cardiovascular toxicity. Monocytes as well as T-lymphocytes play causal roles in the pathophysiology of atherosclerotic disease. We hypothesized that the beneficial impact of the use of belatacept over CNIs on cardiovascular risk could be partly explained by the impact of belatacept therapy on these circulating leukocytes. Hence, we phenotyped circulating leukocytes in transplanted patients with a stable renal function that were randomized between either continuation of CNI or conversion to belatacept in two international studies in which we participated. In 41 patients, we found that belatacept-treated patients consistently showed lower numbers of B-lymphocytes, T-lymphocytes as well as CD14-negative monocytes (CD14NM), especially in non-diabetic patients. Our observation that this decrease was associated to plasma concentrations of TNFα is consistent with a model where CD14NM-production of TNFα is diminished by belatacept-treatment, due to effects on the antigen-presenting cell compartment., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) is a risk factor for the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the production of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) in RA patients. Our objective was to examine the real-world effectiveness of abatacept versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with RA who were SE and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP3) positive., Methods: Abatacept or TNFi initiators who were SE + and anti-CCP3+ (> 20 U/mL) at or prior to treatment and had moderate or high CDAI score (> 10) at initiation were identified. The primary outcome was mean change in CDAI score over six months. Analyses were conducted in propensity score (PS)-trimmed and -matched populations overall and a biologic-experienced subgroup. Mixed-effects models were used., Results: In the overall PS-trimmed (abatacept, n = 170; TNFi, n = 157) and PS-matched cohorts (abatacept, n = 111; TNFi, n = 111), there were numerically greater improvements in mean change in CDAI between abatacept and TNFi but were not statistically significant. Similar trends were seen for biologic-experienced patients, except that statistical significance was reached for mean change in CDAI in the PS-trimmed cohort (abatacept, 12.22 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) 10.13 to 14.31]; TNFi, 9.28 [95%CI 7.08 to 11.48]; p = 0.045)., Conclusion: In this real world cohort, there were numerical improvements in efficacy outcomes with abatacept over TNFi in patients with RA who were SE + and ACPA+, similar to results from a clinical trial population The only statistically significant finding after adjusting for covariates was greater improvement in CDAI with abatacept versus TNFi in the bio-experienced PS-trimmed cohort.., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment has become an important therapeutic option for various cancer types. Although the treatment is effective, ICI can overstimulate the patient's immune system, leading to potentially severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including hepatitis, colitis, pneumonitis and myocarditis. The initial mainstay of treatments includes the administration of corticosteroids. There is little evidence how to treat steroid-resistant (sr) irAEs. It is mainly based on small case series or single case reports. This systematic review summarizes available evidence about sr-irAEs. We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed. Additionally, we included European Society for Medical Oncology, Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Society of Clinical Oncology Guidelines for irAEs in our assessment. The study population of all selected publications had to include patients with cancer who developed hepatitis, colitis, pneumonitis or myocarditis during or after an immunotherapy treatment and for whom corticosteroid therapy was not sufficient. Our literature search was not restricted to any specific cancer diagnosis. Case reports were also included. There is limited data regarding life-threatening sr-irAEs of colon/liver/lung/heart and the majority of publications are single case reports. Most publications investigated sr colitis (n=26), followed by hepatitis (n=21), pneumonitis (n=17) and myocarditis (n=15). There is most data for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to treat sr hepatitis and for infliximab, followed by vedolizumab, to treat sr colitis. Regarding sr pneumonitis there is most data for MMF and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) while data regarding infliximab are conflicting. In sr myocarditis, most evidence is available for the use of abatacept or anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (both with or without MMF) or ruxolitinib with abatacept. This review highlights the need for prompt recognition and treatment of sr hepatitis, colitis, pneumonitis and myocarditis. Guideline recommendations for sr situations are not defined precisely. Based on our search, we recommend-as first line treatment-(1) MMF for sr hepatitis, (2) infliximab for sr colitis, followed by vedolizumab, (3) MMF and IVIG for sr pneumonitis and (4) abatacept or ATG (both with or without MMF) or ruxolitinib with abatacept for sr myocarditis. These additional immunosuppressive agents should be initiated promptly if there is no sufficient response to corticosteroids within 3 days., Competing Interests: Competing interests: ED: None. TW: None. DK: Received consulting/advisor fees from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Drohne, MSD and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Amgen, Roche, Sanofi. AZ: Received consulting/advisor fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Hoffmann–La Roche, NBE Therapeutics, Secarna, ACM Pharma, and Hookipa, and maintains further non-commercial research agreements with Secarna, Roche, Vectorbiopharma, T3 Pharma and Bright Peak Therapeutics. HL: Received travel grants and consultant fees from BMS, Alector, and MSD; received research support from BMS, Novartis, GlycoEra and Palleon Pharmaceuticals. JN: Received consulting/advisor fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche/Genentech, Arcus Biosciences, NGM Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Regeneron, Takeda, Pfizer, Elevation Oncology, AbbVie, Kaleido Biosciences, Daiichi Sankyo. JN: Received research support from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche/Genentech, Arcus Biosciences and Mirati. LC: Research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The biological mechanisms underlying the differential response to abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are unknown. Here, we aimed to identify cellular, transcriptomic, and proteomic features that predict resistance to abatacept in patients with RA., Methods: Blood samples were collected from 22 RA patients treated with abatacept at baseline and after 3 months of treatment. Response to treatment was defined by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria at 3 months, and seven patients were classified as responders and the others as non-responders. We quantified gene expression levels by RNA sequencing, 67 plasma protein levels, and the expression of surface molecules (CD3, 19, and 56) by flow cytometry. In addition, three gene expression data sets, comprising a total of 27 responders and 50 non-responders, were used to replicate the results., Results: Among the clinical characteristics, the number of monocytes was significantly higher in the non-responders before treatment. Cell type enrichment analysis showed that differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between responders and non-responders were enriched in monocytes. Gene set enrichment analysis, together with single-cell analysis and deconvolution analysis, identified that Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) and interleukin-17 receptor A (IL17RA) pathway in monocytes was upregulated in non-responders. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) correlated with this signature showed higher concentrations in non-responders before treatment. The DEGs in the replication set were also enriched for the genes expressed in monocytes, not for the TLR5 and IL17RA pathway but for the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) pathway., Conclusions: Monocyte-derived transcriptomic features before treatment underlie the differences in abatacept efficacy in patients with RA. The pathway activated in monocytes was the TLR5 and IL17RA-HGF signature in the current study, while it was the OXPHOS pathway in the replication set. Elevated levels of HGF before treatment may serve as a potential biomarker for predicting poor responses to abatacept. These findings provide insights into the biological mechanisms of abatacept resistance, contributing valuable evidence for stratifying patients with RA., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objectives: The link between the HLA-DRB1 locus and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) shown in genome-wide association studies strengthens the shared epitope (SE) hypothesis. We aimed to assess the impact of the double dose of the SE (double SE) on RA and explore its clinical associations, including the response to abatacept., Methods: We evaluated RA patients treated with csDMARDs or abatacept for HLA-DRB1 typing, clinical characteristics at baseline, and disease activity and ultrasound findings over 12 months., Results: Patients with the double SE (n = 12) had significantly higher anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) titers, higher total grayscale (GS) score, and power Doppler (PD) score at baseline than patients without the double SE. Patients with the double SE exhibited reduced rates of SDAI remission and pronounced improvements in multiple disease activity between baseline and 12 months, including SDAI, CDAI, total GS score, and total PD score. When focusing on abatacept-treated patients, the decreases in SDAI, CDAI, and total PD score between baseline and 12 months were significantly larger in patients with the double SE., Conclusions: Patients with the double SE exhibited distinct characteristics, increased disease activity, and improved response to abatacept treatment., (© 2024 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) immunosuppression regimens are given as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Most GVHD prophylaxis regimens are based on calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Unfortunately, CNIs are associated with significant associated morbidity, frequently cannot be tolerated, and often need to be discontinued. There is no consensus as to which alternative immunosuppression should be used in cases where CNIs have to be permanently discontinued. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4-immunoglobulin (CTLA4-Ig) blocking agents are well tolerated and have been used extensively in patients with autoimmune disease and as post-transplant immunosuppression. There are two CTLA4-Ig agents: belatacept and abatacept. Belatacept is routinely used in adult kidney transplantation to prevent rejection and abatacept has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for GVHD prophylaxis in patients undergoing a matched or one allele-mismatched unrelated allogenic HCT. Herein, we describe a case in which abatacept was given off-label to replace tacrolimus GVHD prophylaxis in a patient with neurotoxicity undergoing haploidentical HCT. This case suggests that CTLA4-Ig blockade may be a good alternative to a CNI in cases where the CNI needs to be discontinued and warrants further investigation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dimitrios Tzachanis has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb and Divya Koura has served on the advisory board for Bristol Myers Squibb within the past 12 months.

Aim: Mental health is an essential issue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but remains unclear among those receiving biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). We aim to assess the incidence and factors associated with mental illness among patients with RA who underwent b/tsDMARD therapy., Method: We used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database for the period 2001-2020 to identify patients with RA receiving b/tsDMARDs. The primary outcome was newly developed mental illness, including anxiety and mood disorders. We performed a Cox regression analysis to determine factors associated with mental illness and presented as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI)., Results: We enrolled 10 852 patients, with 7854 patients receiving tumor necrosis factors inhibitors (TNFi), 1693 patients receiving non-TNFi bDMARDs, and 1305 patients treated with tsDMARD. We found that 13.62% of enrolled patients developed mental illness, with an incidence rate of 4054 per 100 000 person-year. Those receiving tocilizumab (aHR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.51-0.82), abatacept (aHR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.55-0.86), or tsDMARDs (aHR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47-0.73) had a lower risk of mental illness compared with those receiving TNFi. We also found that old age, low income, diabetes mellitus, use of cyclosporine, and use of steroids were associated with incident mental illness., Conclusion: This population-based study investigated the incidence and factors associated with mental illness among patients with RA receiving b/tsDMARDs. Our findings highlight the need for vigilance with respect to the possibility of mental illness in patients with RA., (© 2023 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Abatacept (CTLA4-Ig)-a monoclonal antibody which restricts T cell activation-is an effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Nevertheless, only 50% of RA patients attain clinical responses, while predictors of response are rather limited. Herein, we aimed to investigate for early biomarkers of response to abatacept, based on a detailed immunological profiling of peripheral blood (PB) cells and serum proteins. We applied flow cytometry and proteomics analysis on PB immune cells and serum respectively, of RA patients starting abatacept as the first biologic agent. After 6 months of treatment, 34.5% of patients attained response. At baseline, Th1 and FoxP3+ T cell populations were positively correlated with tender joint counts ( p -value = 0.047 and p -value = 0.022, respectively). Upon treatment, CTLA4-Ig effectively reduced the percentages of Th1 and Th17 only in responders ( p -value = 0.0277 and p -value = 0.0042, respectively). Notably, baseline levels of Th1 and myeloid cell populations were significantly increased in PB of responders compared to non-responders ( p -value = 0.009 and p -value = 0.03, respectively). Proteomics analysis revealed that several inflammatory mediators were present in serum of responders before therapy initiation and strikingly 10 amongst 303 serum proteins were associated with clinical responses. Finally, a composite index based on selected baseline cellular and proteomics' analysis could predict response to abatacept with a high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (88.24%).

Background: LPS-responsive beige-like anchor (LRBA) deficiency (LRBA -/- ) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA4) insufficiency (CTLA4 +/- ) are mechanistically overlapped diseases presenting with recurrent infections and autoimmunity. The effectiveness of different treatment regimens remains unknown., Objective: Our aim was to determine the comparative efficacy and long-term outcome of therapy with immunosuppressants, CTLA4-immunoglobulin (abatacept), and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in a single-country multicenter cohort of 98 patients with a 5-year median follow-up., Methods: The 98 patients (63 LRBA -/- and 35 CTLA4 +/- ) were followed and evaluated at baseline and every 6 months for clinical manifestations and response to the respective therapies., Results: The LRBA -/- patients exhibited a more severe disease course than did the CTLA4 +/- patients, requiring more immunosuppressants, abatacept, and HSCT to control their symptoms. Among the 58 patients who received abatacept as either a primary or rescue therapy, sustained complete control was achieved in 46 (79.3%) without severe side effects. In contrast, most patients who received immunosuppressants as primary therapy (n = 61) showed either partial or no disease control (72.1%), necessitating additional immunosuppressants, abatacept, or transplantation. Patients with partial or no response to abatacept (n = 12) had longer disease activity before abatacept therapy, with higher organ involvement and poorer disease outcomes than those with a complete response. HSCT was performed in 14 LRBA -/- patients; 9 patients (64.2%) showed complete remission, and 3 (21.3%) continued to receive immunosuppressants after transplantation. HSCT and abatacept therapy gave rise to similar probabilities of survival., Conclusions: Abatacept is superior to immunosuppressants in controlling disease manifestations over the long term, especially when started early, and it may provide a safe and effective therapeutic alternative to transplantation., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) can be life-threatening, if hemoglobin (Hb) levels continue to decline after established treatments with glucocorticoids, rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulins, and plasmapheresis. Impaired regulatory T cells (Treg) are proposed to alleviate AIHA development through decreased binding of CTLA-4 to antigen-presenting cells. Abatacept is a fusion protein with a CTLA-4 domain and is approved for use in rheumatoid arthritis. It mimics the immunosuppressive CTLA-4 effect of Treg. Thus, application of abatacept in refractory AIHA might be reasonable. A 54-year-old woman with known AIHA was admitted to our clinic due to therapy-refractory hemoglobin decrease to 4.0 g/dl. Previously, multiple courses of glucocorticoids, rituximab, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and a splenectomy failed to stop or stabilize hemoglobin levels and hemolysis. A new immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine was initiated and erythropoiesis was stimulated with darbepoetin alfa. Again, therapy failed even though we tried to support immunosuppressive therapy by reducing the amount of pathogenic antibody through plasmapheresis. We stopped the treatment with cyclosporine and applied abatacept instead. After seven days hemoglobin stabilized at 4.3 g/dl and no further red blood cells transfusions were necessary. About one month later hemolysis aggravated again and azathioprine was added to the ongoing abatacept treatment. Finally, the combination of abatacept and azathioprine led to a long-lasting increase of the Hb level above 11 g/dl six months later. Abatacept can be applied to overcome therapy refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia but should be combined with an additional immunosuppressive medication such as azathioprine.

Objectives: The objective was to assess the adherence, persistence, and costs of bDMARDs through a multicentre study of nine Italian hospital pharmacies., Methods: The drugs analysed were Abatacept, Adalimumab, Certolizumab, Etanercept, Golimumab and Tocilizumab.Adult subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis were considered in the analysis.In this study, we calculated the following metrics: Adherence to treatment was evaluated as dose-intensity, which is the ratio between the amount of medication received and probably taken by the patient at home (Received Daily Dose, RDD) and the amount prescribed by the clinician (Prescribed Daily Dose, PDD). Persistence was calculated as the number of days between the first and last dispensing of the same drug. Lastly, costs were assessed based on persistence to treatment and normalized for adherence., Results: Adherence to treatment was found to be above 0.8 for all drugs studied. The median persistence for a 5-year treatment period was 1.4 years for Abatacept, 1.7 years for Adalimumab, 1.8 years for Certolizumab, 1.4 years for Etanercept, 1.3 years for Golimumab, and 1.6 years for Tocilizumab., Conclusions: This multicentre retrospective observational study of bDMARDs used in the treatment of RA showed that, for all the drugs studied, there was no problem with adherence to treatment but rather a difficulty in maintaining treatment with the same drug over time.

Although biologics have their own characteristics, there are no clear criteria for selecting them to treat the patients with rheumatoid arthritis. To assist in selecting biologics, we investigated the retention rates of biologics at our institution. We examined retention rates, and reasons for dropout for biologics in 393 cases and 605 prescriptions (of which 378 prescriptions were as naive) at our hospital since October 2003. Throughout the entire course of the study, etanercept (ETN) was the most frequently used biologic, followed by adalimumab (ADA) and tocilizumab (TCZ). When narrowed down to the later period from 2010, ETN was still the most used, followed by TCZ and abatacept (ABT). When the retention rates were compared in biologic naive patients, the retention rates were TCZ, ABT, ETN, certolizumab pegol (CZP), golimumab (GLM), infliximab (IFX), and ADA, in that order. The retention rates were better with the first use of each biologic. The main reasons for dropout were primary ineffectiveness, secondary ineffectiveness, and infection. ETN was the most used biologic in our hospital, with an increasing trend toward the use of non-TNF inhibitors. Retention rates were higher in non-TNF inhibitors., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The adoptive transfer of insulin-producing cells (IPCs) is one of the promising treatments for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. While the use of allogeneic cell resources is inevitable in the case of a series of patients, alloimmune responses are a major barrier ahead of the successful implementation of allogeneic therapeutic cells. This study is aimed at evaluating the potential of CTLA4-Ig, as an approved immunomodulatory biologic, in protecting the IPCs against allogeneic immune responses. The C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice were used to establish a murine model of allogeneic cell transplantation. The mouse bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells were in vitro differentiated into IPCs, and the in vitro as well as the in vivo immune responses against IPCs were evaluated in the presence and absence of CTLA4-Ig. The allogeneic IPCs induced the in vitro activation of CD4 + T-cells, IFN-γ release, and the proliferation of lymphocytes, which all were controlled by CTLA4-Ig. Upon in vivo transfer of IPC into an allogeneic host, the splenic CD4 + and CD8 + T-cells exhibited a significant activation, and there was a significant donor-specific antibody response. Either of the mentioned cellular and humoral responses were modulated by a CTLA4-Ig regimen. This regimen also reduced the infiltration of CD3 + T-cells into the IPC injection site along with the improved overall survival of diabetic mice. CTLA4-Ig could be a complementary therapy for improving the efficacy of allogeneic IPC therapy through modulating the cellular and humoral responses that can lead to prolonged durability of IPCs within an allogeneic host., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of novel biologics for the treatment of lupus nephritis based on a reticulated meta-analysis approach. Registered clinical trials in 4 major databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials) and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched with a search time frame of build to June 2022. And we screened registered randomized controlled clinical trials of biologics for the treatment of lupus nephritis according to the protocol's nadir criteria. Trials were evaluated for quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool, and data were statistically analyzed using Stata 16.0 and Review Manager 5.3 software to compare and rank differences in effectiveness and safety between the biologics. A total of 10 registered randomized controlled clinical trials involving 2148 subjects were included in this study. The interventions were ranked from best to worst in terms of the primary outcome indicator of effectiveness, renal complete remission: belimumab > anifrolumab (900 + 300) mg > obinutuzumab > ocrelizumab 400 mg > abatacept 30/10 mg/kg > belimumab + rituximab > abatacept 10/10 mg/kg > abatacept (30/10 + 10/10) mg/kg > placeo > ocrelizumab 1000 mg > rituximab > anifrolumab 300 mg, belimumab was superior to placebo [OR = 1.75, 95% CI (1.13, 2.70)] and anifrolumab 300 mg [OR = 3.27, 95% CI (1.05, 10.14)], anifrolumab (900 + 300) mg was superior to anifrolumab 300 mg [OR = 3.56, 95% CI (1.30, 9.76)], and all were statistically significant. The ranking of each intervention in terms of overall renal remission for secondary outcome indicators from best to worst was: obinutuzumab > belimumab + rituximab > anifrolumab (900 + 300) mg > ocrelizumab 1000 mg > ocrelizumab 400 mg > belimumab > rituximab 1000 mg > abatacept 30/10 mg/kg > abatacept (30/10 + 10/10) mg/kg > placeo > abatacept 10/10 mg/kg > anifrolumab 300 mg, obinutuzumab was superior to placebo [OR = 2.27, 95% CI (1.11, 4.67)] and belimumab was also superior to placebo [OR = 1.56, 95% CI (1.07, 2.27)], and all were statistically significant. In terms of safety, with a focus on serious adverse events and serious infections, the results were: Serious adverse events at 1 year of monitoring occurred better with ocrelizumab 1000 mg than ocrelizumab 400 mg [OR = 0.51, 95% CI (0.29, 0.89)] and were statistically different; serious adverse events at 2 years of monitoring infection adverse events occurred better with obinutuzumab than with abatacept (30/10 + 10/10) mg/kg [OR = 0.24, 95% CI (0.07, 0.81)] and were statistically different. The safety of the new biologics in combination with conventional standard therapies is generally good, but it is belimumab and obinutuzumab that are most effective in achieving complete and overall remission in the kidney. This study protocol has been registered with PROSPERO, with a registration number of CRD42021262498., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Objective: To describe the efficacy and safety data of children with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pcJIA) treated with abatacept (ABA) + methotrexate (MTX) or ABA monotherapy when prior MTX use was either ineffective or not tolerated., Methods: Posthoc analysis of 2 phase III trials of subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) ABA over 2 years in patients with pcJIA (aged 2-17 years). Patients were stratified by treatment with ABA + MTX or ABA monotherapy and further by prior biologic use. Efficacy outcomes included JIA-American College of Rheumatology (JIA-ACR) responses, Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 27 joints using C-reactive protein (JADAS27-CRP), and safety. Descriptive pharmacokinetic analyses were also performed., Results: Efficacy responses (JIA-ACR and JADAS27-CRP) were similar between patients receiving ABA + MTX (n = 310) or ABA monotherapy (n = 99) and persisted over 2 years. Clinical response rates were similar in biologic-naïve patients and prior biologic users; this was independent of MTX use. Across both studies, ABA + MTX and ABA monotherapy displayed similar safety profiles. Pharmacokinetic results revealed similar minimum steady-state trough ABA concentrations between studies. Further, baseline MTX did not influence ABA clearance and was not a significant predictor of JIA-ACR responses., Conclusion: ABA monotherapy (SC and IV) was effective and well tolerated in children with pcJIA when prior MTX use was ineffective or not tolerated. Treatment effects of ABA appear to be independent of MTX coadministration. Consequently, ABA monotherapy can be considered for those with prior biologic therapy if MTX use is inappropriate. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01844518 and NCT00095173)., (Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) causes bone loss, only partly related to inflammation. The impact of RA treatments on bone metabolism and their ability to mitigate bone loss remains uncertain. The primary goal of our study was to examine the influence of abatacept on serum levels of markers and regulators involved in bone turnover. Secondary objectives included evaluating changes in bone mineral density (BMD), bone health parameters, erosions, and exploring potential correlations among these parameters. We conducted a prospective observational study on patients with active seropositive RA failure to biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs initiating treatment with abatacept. We measured at baseline and after 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months: serum bone turnover markers (CTX, P1nP, B-ALP), bone modulators (Dkk-1, sclerostin, vitamin D, PTH, OPG and RANKL), BMD and radiographic parameters (modified Sharp van der Heijde score [mSvdH], bone health index [BHI] and metacarpal index [MCI]). Disease activity and glucocorticoid intake was monitored. 33 patients were enrolled in the study. We found a significant increase in markers of bone formation (B-ALP and P1nP) from baseline to M6 and M12. PTH increased significantly at M6 but not at M12. All other bone markers and modulators did not change. We found a significant decrease in BHI and MCI from baseline to M12 (median difference - 0.17 95% CI - 0.42 to - 0.10, p 0.001 and - 0.09 95% CI - 0.23 to - 0.07, respectively). BMD at femoral neck transitorily decreased at M6 (mean difference - 0.019 g/cm 2 95% CI - 0.036 to - 0.001 p 0.04). BMD at total hip, lumbar spine and mSvdH score did not change significantly. P1nP delta at M12 correlated with delta mSvdH. Treatment with abatacept was associated with a significant increase in bone formation markers. The secondary and transient increase in PTH serum levels may be responsible of the transitory bone loss., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

Objectives: CTLA4 deficiency (CTLA4d) is a disease with multisystem autoimmune features, including neurologic manifestations. We aimed to describe neurologic involvement in these patients., Methods: We performed a cross-sectional observational study using the French Reference Centre for Primary Immunodeficiencies (CEREDIH) registry plus a surveillance in national society networks. Participants with confirmed CTLA4d and neurologic involvement were included. Clinical, laboratory, and radiologic features were collected, as well as treatments. Available MRI was double-reviewed., Results: Among 70 patients with CTLA4d, 13 patients (21%) had neurologic involvement. Neurologic symptoms began at a median age of 18 [15-45] years, mostly occurring after systemic manifestations (median delay: 8.5 [4.5-10.5] years). Main symptoms included headaches, focal deficit (54% each), and seizures (38%). MRI detected at least 1 large contrast-enhancing lesion in 8 patients. Lesions reminiscent of multiple sclerosis lesions were found in 6 patients. Cerebellar (6 patients) and large spinal cord lesions (3 patients) were common. Ten patients were treated with abatacept, of whom 9 (90%) showed good clinical and radiologic response., Discussion: Neurologic involvement is common among patients with CTLA4d. Despite its rarity, and considering the suspected efficacy of abatacept, neurologists should be aware of the characteristics of CTLA4d neurologic involvement., (© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.)

Combined antigen-specific T cell receptor stimulation and costimulation are needed for complete T cell activation. Belatacept and abatacept are nondepleting fusion proteins blocking CD28/B7 costimulation, whereas siplizumab is a depleting antiCD2 immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody targeting CD2/CD58 costimulation. Herein, the effect of siplizumab combination therapy with abatacept or belatacept on T cell alloreactivity in mixed lymphocyte reactions was investigated. In contrast to monotherapy, the combination of siplizumab with belatacept or abatacept induced near-complete suppression of T cell proliferation and increased the potency of siplizumab-mediated T cell inhibition. Furthermore, dual targeting of CD2 and CD28 costimulation enhanced the selective depletion of memory T cells compared with monotherapy. Although siplizumab monotherapy leads to significant regulatory T cell enrichment, high doses of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 and a human IgG1 Fc fragment in the combination therapy reduced this effect. These results support the clinical evaluation of dual costimulation blockade, combining siplizumab with abatacept or belatacept, for the prophylaxis of organ transplant rejection and improvement of long-term outcomes following transplantation. Ongoing investigative research will elucidate when other forms of siplizumab-based dual costimulatory blockade may be able to induce similarly strong inhibition of T cell activation although still allowing for enrichment of regulatory T cells., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: David Berglund reports financial support was provided by ITB-MED. David Berglund reports a relationship with ITB-MED that includes: employment, equity or stocks, and funding grants. David Berglund has patent pending to ITB-MED.Erik Berglund reports financial support was provided by ITB-MED. Erik Berglund reports a relationship with ITB-MED that includes: employment and equity or stocks. Erik Berglund has patent pending to ITB-MED. Filip Cvetkovski reports financial support was provided by ITB-MED. Filip Cvetkovski reports a relationship with ITB-MED that includes: employment. Filip Cvetkovski has patent pending to ITB-MED. The other authors have nothing to declare. The authors of this manuscript have conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation. F. Cvetkovski, R. Razavi, E. Berglund, and D. Berglund are employees of ITB-MED. E. Berglund and D. Berglund own shares in ITB-MED. F. Sellberg is a former employee of ITB-MED. The ITB-MED Group has applied for patent protection for the use of siplizumab in combination with CTLA4-Ig treatment., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of non-conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (ncs-DMARD) strategies on patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD)., Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles from inception to 1 June 2022. The results obtained from the analysis were expressed as mean difference (MD), effect size and 95% CI., Results: A total of 17 studies, including 1315 patients with RA-ILD, were eligible. The ncs-DMARDs included abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, tumour necrosis factor and Janus kinase inhibitors. Compared with the baseline, there were no significant changes in forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV 1 ) and diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) values in the pooled data after ncs-DMARD treatment (alone or combined with conventional therapy) (p=0.36 for FVC; p=0.96 for FEV 1 and p=0.46 for DLCO). Of note, FVC was obviously increased in rituximab subgroup (MD=-4.62, 95% CI -8.90 to -0.33, p=0.03). Also, high-resolution CT non-progression rate and fatality rate due to ILD progression in patients with RA-ILD were 0.792 (95% CI 0.746 to 0.834, p=0.015) and 0.049 (95% CI 0.035 to 0.065, p=0.000), respectively., Conclusion: ncs-DMARDs alone or combined with conventional therapy might be an optimal and promising treatment for stabilising or improving ILD in patients with RA-ILD., Prospero Registration Number: CRD42022356816., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The optimal first-line treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is debated. We compared clinical and radiographic outcomes of active conventional therapy with each of three biological treatments with different modes of action., Methods: Investigator-initiated, randomised, blinded-assessor study. Patients with treatment-naïve early RA with moderate-severe disease activity were randomised 1:1:1:1 to methotrexate combined with (1) active conventional therapy: oral prednisolone (tapered quickly, discontinued at week 36) or sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine and intra-articular glucocorticoid injections in swollen joints; (2) certolizumab pegol; (3) abatacept or (4) tocilizumab. Coprimary endpoints were week 48 Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission (CDAI ≤2.8) and change in radiographic van der Heijde-modified Sharp Score, estimated using logistic regression and analysis of covariance, adjusted for sex, anticitrullinated protein antibody status and country. Bonferroni's and Dunnet's procedures adjusted for multiple testing (significance level: 0.025)., Results: Eight hundred and twelve patients were randomised. Adjusted CDAI remission rates at week 48 were: 59.3% (abatacept), 52.3% (certolizumab), 51.9% (tocilizumab) and 39.2% (active conventional therapy). Compared with active conventional therapy, CDAI remission rates were significantly higher for abatacept (adjusted difference +20.1%, p<0.001) and certolizumab (+13.1%, p=0.021), but not for tocilizumab (+12.7%, p=0.030). Key secondary clinical outcomes were consistently better in biological groups. Radiographic progression was low, without group differences.The proportions of patients with serious adverse events were abatacept, 8.3%; certolizumab, 12.4%; tocilizumab, 9.2%; and active conventional therapy, 10.7%., Conclusions: Compared with active conventional therapy, clinical remission rates were superior for abatacept and certolizumab pegol, but not for tocilizumab. Radiographic progression was low and similar between treatments., Trial Registration Number: NCT01491815., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MØ received the study drug from BMS and UCB; research grants from Abbvie, BMS, Merck, Novartis and UCB; speaker fees from Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, MEDAC, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and UCB; and consultancy fees from Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, MEDAC, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz and UCB. RFvV received the study drug from BMS and UCB; research grants from BMS, GSK, UCB and AstraZeneca; consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, BMS, Galapagos, Janssen, Miltenyi, Pfizer and UCB; expert fees from AbbVie, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, R-Pharma and UCB; and advisory board fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, BMS, Galapagos, Janssen, Miltenyi, Pfizer and UCB. MLH received research grants from AbbVie, Biogen, BMS, Celtrion, Eli Lily, Janssen Biologics B.V., Lundbeck Foundation, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Biopies, Sandoz and Novartis; and institution pay from Pfizer, Medac, AbbVie and Sandoz; chaired the steering committee of the Danish Rheumatology Quality Registry (DANBIO), which receives public funding from the hospital owners and funding from pharmaceutical companies; cochairs EuroSpA, which generates real-world evidence of treatment of psoriatic arthritis and axial spondylorthritis based on secondary data and is partly funded by Novartis. DCN received consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB' meeting support from Pfizer; advisory board participation fee from Novartis; and other service fee by BMS. MTN received research grants from AbbVie, BMS, Pfizer, Galapagos, Amgen and Eli Lily. BG received consulting fee from Novartis and honorary lecture payment from Novartis and Nordic-Pharma. IG received royalty fee for book authorship and support for attending meetings by EULAR. DG received advisory board fee from Eli Lily and AbbVie and speakers fee from Eli Lily. A-BA received speakers fee from AbbVie, Eli Lily, Novartis and Pfizer. CG received the study drug from BMS and UCB. MKL received advisory board fee from AbbVie. AS received advisory board fee from GSK (institution pay). LU received speakers fee from Janssen and support for meeting/travel from AbbVie and Eli Lily. DJS received honorarium fee from UCB (not a part of this, unrelated medication). GB received consultancy fee from UCB. ICO received research grants from EU Horizon 2020 and EU Horizon Europe, advisory board participation from IMPRESS-Norway, ALPHA2PREVENT, FLECAPRO and EVOLVD, and meeting/travel support from European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network. The remaining authors declared no disclosures., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: To compare a treat-to-target (T2T) approach and routine care (RC) in adults with active to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating subcutaneous abatacept., Methods: A 12-month cluster-randomized trial in active RA patients treated with abatacept was conducted. Physicians were randomized to RC or T2T with a primary endpoint of achieving sustained Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) low disease activity (LDA) at two consecutive assessments approximately 3 months apart. Additional outcomes included Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Disease Activity Score 28-CRP (DAS28-CRP), Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Time to achieve therapeutic endpoints was assessed with survival analysis., Results: Among the 284 enrolled patients, 130 were in the T2T group and 154 in RC. Primary endpoint was achieved by 36.9% and 40.3% of patients in T2T and RC groups, respectively. No significant between-group differences were observed in the odds of achieving secondary outcomes, except for a higher likelihood of CDAI LDA in the T2T group vs. RC (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.33 [1.03-1.71], p = 0.0263). Compared with RC, patients in the T2T group achieved SDAI remission significantly faster (Kaplan-Meier-estimated mean [standard error]: 14.0 [0.6] vs. 19.3 [0.8] months, p = 0.0428) with a trend toward faster achievement of CDAI LDA/remission, DAS28-CRP remission, and HAQ-DI minimum clinically important difference., Conclusions: Patients managed per T2T and those under RC experienced significant improvements in RA disease activity at 12 months of abatacept treatment. T2T was associated with higher odds of CDAI LDA and a shorter time to achieving therapeutic endpoints., Trial Registration: Name of the registry: ClinicalTrials.gov., Trial Registrations: NCT03274141 . Date of registration: September 6, 2017., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by hyperplasia of keratinocytes and immune cell infiltration. The IL-17-producing T cells play a key role in psoriasis pathogenesis, while regulatory T (Treg) cells are diminished during psoriatic inflammation. Current psoriasis treatments largely focus on IL-17 and IL-23, however, few studies have explored therapeutic drugs targeting an increase of Treg cells to control immune homeostasis. In this study, we investigated the effects of a cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) signaling peptide (dNP2-ctCTLA-4) in Th17, Tc17, γδ T cells, Treg cells in vitro and a mouse model of psoriasis. Treatment with dNP2-ctCTLA-4 peptide showed a significant reduction of psoriatic skin inflammation with increased Treg cell proportion and reduced IL-17 production by T cells, indicating a potential role in modulating psoriatic skin disease. We compared dNP2-ctCTLA-4 with CTLA-4-Ig and found that only dNP2-ctCTLA-4 ameliorated the psoriasis progression, with increased Treg cells and inhibited IL-17 production from γδ T cells. In vitro experiments using a T cell-antigen presenting cell co-culture system demonstrated the distinct mechanisms of dNP2-ctCTLA-4 compared to CTLA-4-Ig in the induction of Treg cells. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of dNP2-ctCTLA-4 peptide in psoriasis by augmenting Treg/Teff ratio, offering a new approach to modulating the disease., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer JL declared a shared affiliation with the author JHK to the handling editor at the time of review., (Copyright © 2023 Lee, Nam, Kim, Kim, Kim, Shin, Kim and Choi.)

HLA-DRB1 shared epitope risk alleles are the strongest genetic risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and potential biomarkers for treatment response to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). This study aimed to investigate the association between treatment response and individual HLA-DRB1 alleles in RA patients receiving different bDMARDs. We recruited 106 patients with active RA who had started abatacept, tocilizumab, or TNF inhibitors as a first-line bDMARDs. We examined the relationship between Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) improvement at 3 months and HLA-DRB1 allele carriage. The results revealed that the HLA-DRB1*04:05 allele, a shared-epitope allele, was significantly associated with better SDAI improvement only after abatacept treatment (SDAI improvement 28.5% without the allele vs 59.8% with allele, p = 0.003). However, no significant association was found with other treatments. Both multivariate linear regression and mediation analysis confirmed that the HLA-DRB1*04:05 allele was independently associated with abatacept treatment response, regardless of anti-CCP antibody titers. The study concluded that in patients with RA receiving their first-line bDMARD treatment, carrying the HLA-DRB1*04:05 allele was associated with better SDAI improvement specifically in abatacept-treated patients. These disease-risk HLA alleles have the potential to serve as genomic biomarkers for predicting treatment response with co-stimulation blockage therapy., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

Introduction: Belatacept is associated with a higher incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and atypical presentations. Ocular manifestations are rare, representing up to 5% of disease manifestations and previous cases consisted in isolated retinitis., Case Description: Herein, we report the case of an 81-year-old kidney transplant recipient who developed an anterior and intermediate uveitis under belatacept therapy. The diagnosis was established using quantitative CMV polymerase chain reaction assays in the aqueous humor. Belatacept was interrupted and oral and topical valganciclovir treatments were instituted. Lesions however extended, leading to intensify the treatment by intra-venous and intra-vitreal ganciclovir injections. Visual acuity stabilized and ocular inflammation was finally controlled after 3 months., Conclusion: Clinicians should be aware of CMV infection as a cause of anterior uveitis under belatacept-based regimen, even in the absence of symptoms suggestive of systemic CMV replication.

Background/aim: A real challenge for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and rheumatologists is primary nonresponse status (PNRS) or secondary nonresponse status (SNRS) to various therapies. Despite their detrimental influence on patient life quality, PNRS and SNRS have no accurate definition and no early predictive criteria for their development exist. Patients with RA under 40 years of age are rare, hence PNRS and SNRS data for this age group are scarce. This study examined the PNRS and SNRS according to sex, age, BMI, therapy type, and duration., Patients and Methods: Retrospectively, 115 patients with RA having PNRS and/or SNRS were stratified by age (22-39, 40-59, and 60-81). The association between body mass index (BMI), proinflammatory cytokines inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, and TNF-alpha inhibitors, sex, age, and PNRS and SNRS was examined., Results: All three proinflammatory cytokine inhibitors (rituximab, tocilizumab, and abatacept) were associated with PNRS and SNRS in women with a high BMI aged 40-59 years. Abatacept-related PNRS and SNRS was significant in women with normal BMI aged 60-81 years. Adalimumab, infliximab, and golimumab affected SNRS differently in women with normal BMI aged 22-39 years and women with high BMI aged 60-81 years. Etanercept and infliximab were associated with SNRS status in men with high-BMI aged 40-59 years., Conclusion: PNRS and SNRS development in patients with RA is significantly influenced by age, sex, and BMI, but most importantly is closely and differentially related to therapy type and duration., (Copyright © 2023, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Belatacept may provide benefit in delayed graft function, but its association with infectious complications is understudied. We aim to assess the incidence of CMV and BK viremia in patients treated with sirolimus or belatacept as part of a three-drug immunosuppression regimen after kidney transplantation., Materials and Methods: Kidney transplant recipients from 01/01/2015 to 10/01/2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Maintenance immunosuppression was either tacrolimus, mycophenolate and sirolimus (B 0 ) or tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and belatacept (5.0 mg/kg monthly) (B 1 ). Primary outcomes of interest were BK and CMV viremia which were followed until the end of the study period. Secondary outcomes included graft function (serum creatinine, eGFR) and acute rejection through 12 months., Results: Belatacept was initiated in patients with a higher mean kidney donor profile index (B 0 :0.36 vs. B 1 :0.44, p = .02) with more delayed graft function (B 0 :6.1% vs. B 1 :26.1%, p < .001). Belatacept therapy was associated with more "severe" CMV viremia >25,000 copies/mL (B 0 :1.2% vs. B 1 :5.9%, p = .016) and CMV disease (B 0 :0.41% vs. B 1 :4.2%, p = .015). However, there was no difference in the overall incidence of CMV viremia >200 IU/mL (B 0 :9.4% vs. B 1 :13.5%, p = .28). There was no difference in the incidence of BK viremia >200 IU/mL (B 0 :29.7% vs. B 1 :31.1%, p = .78) or BK-associated nephropathy (B 0 :2.4% vs. B 1 :1.7%, p = .58), but belatacept was associated with "severe" BK viremia, defined as >10,000 IU/mL (B 0 :13.0% vs. B 1 :21.8%, p = .03). The mean serum Cr was significantly higher with belatacept therapy at 1-year follow up (B 0 :1.24 mg/dL vs. B 1 :1.43 mg/dL, p = .003). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (B 0 :1.2% vs. B 1 :2.6%, p = .35) and graft loss (B 0 :1.2% vs. B 1 :0.84%, p = .81) were comparable at 12 months., Conclusions: Belatacept therapy was associated with an increased risk of CMV disease and "severe" CMV and BK viremia. However, this regimen did not increase the overall incidence of infection and facilitated comparable acute rejection and graft loss at 12-month follow up., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no financial or other conflicts of interest. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)