Search

Copyright of Estudios Gerenciales is the property of Universidad ICESI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of REMAH Journal is the property of Research & Development of Human Recourses Center (REMAH) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This study investigates the effect of historical military conflict (between the home countries of venture capital (VC) firms and portfolio companies) on the performance of cross‐border VC investments. Using exhaustive data on global cross‐border investments during 1986–2017, we find that adverse memories imprinted by historical military conflict have a negative effect on cross‐border performance as measured by internal rate of return and public market equivalent. We show that nation‐dyadic (i.e. political affinity) and ownership control strategy (i.e. board seat and syndication)‐related contingencies moderate the relationship between historical military conflict and cross‐border performance. Collectively, our findings shed light on the presence of intergroup interaction challenges and mistrust when investing in cross‐border VC deals and demonstrate channels to mitigate their adverse effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examines whether institutional investors invest less into overvalued firms due to their informational advantage. Considering high media sentiment as a source of overvaluation, we show that institutional investors tend to hold fewer stocks of firms that receive high media sentiment. The size of the overvaluation is empirically shown as a channel through which media sentiment influences the ownership structure in firms. We conclude this paper by showing institutional investors do not view high media sentiment as a chance to withdraw their money from firms with poor corporate governance structure that the institutional investors cannot exert much influence on. Instead, institutional investors tend not to invest in these firms from the start. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Contemporary Accounting Research is the property of Canadian Academic Accounting Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This study selects stock data of listed companies in China's A-share stock market from 2011 to 2020 as research samples. Using a fixed-effects model, it examines the impact of analyst optimism on stock price collapses and the moderating effect of information disclosure quality. Simultaneously, it conducts additional research to explore the potential transmission mechanisms involved. The main findings are as follows: Firstly, a positive correlation exists between analyst optimism and the risk of stock price collapse. Secondly, improving information disclosure quality of listed companies can enhance the positive impact of analyst optimism on the risk of stock price collapses and expedite the market's adjustment of overly optimistic valuations of listed companies. Additionally, analyst optimism can increase the risk of stock price collapses by affecting institutional ownership. These findings provide theoretical support for regulatory authorities to revise and improve the "information disclosure evaluation" system, regulate the analyst industry, guide analyst behavior, and encourage listed companies to enhance internal governance and improve information disclosure practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study is to measure the risk disclosure level and to determine the relationship between ownership structure dimensions (institutional ownership, foreign ownership and family ownership) and corporate risk disclosure in Jordan. Design/methodology/approach: This study used a sample of 94 Jordanian listed firms from the Amman Stock Exchange for the period from 2014 to 2017. This study measured risk disclosure using the number of risk-related sentences in the annual report, while random effects regression was used for hypotheses testing. Findings: The results revealed that family ownership has a negative effect on risk disclosure practices, but institutional ownership, foreign ownership, firm size and leverage have no significant effect on the risk disclosure level. Practical implications: The finding of this study is more likely be useful for many concerned parties, researchers, authorities, investors and financial analysts alike in understanding the current practices of the risk disclosure in Jordan, thus helping them in reconsidering and reviewing the accounting standards and improving the credibility and transparency of the financial reports in the Jordanian capital market. Originality/value: This study offers novel evidence detailing the impact of ownership structure toward corporate risk disclosure, its implementation in emerging markets following the minimal amount of scholarly efforts on the topic. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first examination of the impact of ownership structure on corporate risk disclosure. Thus, this study has important implications for the decisions of executives, policymakers, shareholders and lenders, as it enables them to better understand the linkage between ownership structure on corporate risk disclosure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to examine the Analysis of the Effect of Leverage, Profitability, Firm Size, Sales Growth and Institutional Ownership on Tax Avoidance. The object of this research is a manufacturing company in the consumer goods industry sector (goods consumer industry). The sample used in this study was 115 samples consisting of 23 companies for 5 years. With purposive sampling technique, the method used is multiple regression analysis, classical assumption test and descriptive statistics. The results showed that Leverage had no effect on tax avoidance, Profitability had a positive effect on tax avoidance, Firm size had no effect on tax avoidance, Sales Growth had a negative effect on tax avoidance, and Institutional ownership had no effect on tax avoidance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This paper aims to review empirical research on the relationship between institutional ownership (IO) and board governance (85 studies). Design/methodology/approach: Based on agency and upper echelons theory, the heterogeneous monitoring function of specific types and the nature of institutional investors on board composition, compensation and chief executive officer (CEO) characteristics will be focused. Findings: The author found that most studies have referred to archival studies, analyzed the impact of board governance on IO, focused on CEO characteristics, neglected IO heterogeneity and advanced regression models to address endogeneity concerns. In line with the theoretical framework, the relationship between total IO and board governance is heterogeneous. However, specific types such as foreign, dedicated and pressure-resistant institutions represent active monitoring tools and push for increased board governance. Research limitations/implications: The author provided useful recommendations for future research from a content and methodological perspective, e.g. the need for analyzing the impact of IO on sustainable board governance and other characteristics of top management team members, e.g. the chief financial officer. Practical implications: As many regulatory bodies implemented regulations to promote shareholder rights and board governance, this literature review highlights the connections of both corporate governance mechanisms. Managers should conduct a careful and timely investor analysis and change the composition and compensation of the board of directors in line with institutional investors' preferences. Originality/value: This analysis makes useful contributions to prior research by focusing on IO and board governance, whereas the author structured the heterogeneous variables and results within the structured literature review. The authors guides researchers, regulatory bodies and business practice in this corporate governance topic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Environmental disclosure conveys non‐financial information primarily through narrative descriptions. The readability of such narratives affects the effectiveness of environmental communication and shapes information content. Prior research on the influence of institutional ownership on corporate disclosure strategy remains inconclusive due to the heterogeneity of institutional investors. In this study, we analyze a comprehensive sample of A‐share Chinese companies that issued corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports to examine the impact of institutional investors on the overall readability of environmental disclosure. Our findings indicate that long‐term institutional investors have a positive influence on the readability of environmental disclosure, while short‐term institutional investors do not show significant correlation with readability. Furthermore, corporate governance acts as a mediating factor in the relationship between long‐term institutional investors and readability. We also find that long‐term institutional investors can enhance firm value by improving the readability of environmental disclosures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine whether and how financial performance feedback influences green innovation performance by drawing on the behavioral theory of the firm (BTOF) and relying on motivation-based logic. Design/methodology/approach: A total of 17,558 firm-year observations from 3,062 publicly traded firms in China are used as the research sample. Findings: The results reveal that low-performing firms are less likely to conduct green innovation activities because managers burden pressure to meet short-term targets. This study further finds that these relations are moderated by institutional ownership. Originality/value: This study contributes to the BTOF literature by linking performance feedback to green innovation activities. This study applies a motivation-based logic to relate performance below and above aspirations to green innovation activities. This study introduces institutional ownership as a boundary condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We show that the post-earnings announcement drift (PEAD) is stronger for conglomerates than single-segment firms. Conglomerates, on average, are larger than single segment firms, so it is unlikely that limits-to-arbitrage drive the difference in PEAD. Rather, we hypothesize that market participants find it more costly and difficult to understand firm-specific earnings information regarding conglomerates, as they have more complicated business models than single-segment firms. This in turn slows information processing about them. In support of our hypothesis, we find that, compared to single-segment firms with similar firm characteristics, conglomerates have relatively low institutional ownership and short interest, are covered by fewer analysts, and these analysts have less industry expertise and make larger forecast errors. Finally, we find that an increase in organizational complexity leads to larger PEAD and document that more complicated conglomerates have even greater PEAD. Our results are robust to an extensive list of alternative explanations of PEAD as well as alternative measures of firm complexity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using an international data set that quantifies corporate environmental costs, we analyze the influence of institutional investor ownership, particularly investment horizon and investor origin, on the monetized environmental impact generated by their investee firms. Institutional investor ownership is negatively related to corporate environmental costs. This effect is driven by long‐term foreign institutional investors, especially investors from advanced economies. Corporate environmental costs are negatively correlated with firm valuation and positively correlated with the cost of equity. Since corporate environmental costs are not reflected in environmental, social and governance ratings, our results shed new light on the role of institutional investors in shaping corporate environmental impact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This research aims to obtain empirical evidence regarding the influence of liquidity as measured by the Current Ratio, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, and profitability as measured by Return on Assets on capital structure. Firms increase leverage to support growth or to offset poor performance. The population of this study is companies listed as consumers of the non-cyclical sector on the IDX in 2018-2022, with as many as 113 companies. The method used is quantitative with statistical analysis of panel data regression. Capital structure is the dependent variable, and profitability, liquidity, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership are independent variables. The method used is quantitative, with statistical analysis of panel data regression using the SPSS Analysis tool. Capital structure is a framework that describes how equity and debt are used to finance company operations to generate optimal returns for shareholders and maximise company returns by considering the level of risk. The results showed that the Probability (ROA) and Liquidity (CR) were partially significant to the Capital Structure. Institutional and managerial ownership have no significant effect on the Capital Structure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper investigates the effects of institutional investor horizons on investment efficiency in China. By analysing 26,831 firm‐year observations from Chinese listed companies, we find that long‐term (short‐term) institutional ownership is negatively (positively) associated with the level of inefficient investments. A battery of robustness tests indicates causality. Further analyses reveal that the rise in environmental uncertainty and information asymmetry are transmission channels for increased inefficient investments. Moreover, we find that the single controlling shareholder and state owner can curb the management myopia induced by short‐term institutional investors while they do not impede the monitoring effort of long‐term institutional investors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using Korean firms that are cross-listed in the US market, this paper investigates whether there are standalone effects of geographic and market proximity of institutional investors on monitoring performance. We find that Korean institutional ownership is negatively associated with earnings management while the US institutional ownership has no impact on earnings management. This suggests that there is the geographic proximity advantage over the market proximity advantage in the emerging markets. Furthermore, we also show that the impact of geographic proximity is stronger for firms with high informational opacity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigates the impact of board governance mechanism on investment efficiency (IE) in PSX-listed firms. The study also examines the role of institutional ownership (IO) in board-IE relationships. In addition, we extend our analysis to re-examine this relationship by splitting the sample into two groups, i.e., the introductory phase of corporate governance (CG) i.e., 2004 to 2013, and revised codes of CG (2014 to 2018) to examine the impact of these separately on IE. The sample data comprises 155 non-financial PSX-listed firms from 2004 to 2018. IE is measured using firms' growth opportunities. The random effect model is used to test the study's hypotheses. A robustness test is also performed to validate the study's findings. The paired-sample t-test results show a significant improvement in IE after revising the CG codes in 2012. According to the regression results, board size has a significant direct, whereas board diversity has a significant inverse effect on IE. Regarding moderating effect, IO was found to moderate the relationship between board independence and IE significantly. Furthermore, it was discovered that following the issuance of revised CG codes-2012, the level of board independence and diversity increased in PSX-listed firms; however, only diversity positively impacted IE, and board independence had no impact on IE from 2014 to 2018. Despite the issuance of revised CG codes-2012, the level of CG among PSX-listed firms is low, which is a source of concern for regulators such as the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this research is to obtain empirical evidence regarding the influence of management ownership, institutional ownership, independent ownership boards, audit committees on profitability (Return On Equity) in companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sampling technique used purposive sampling, the research samples obtained were 15 companies for the 2019-2022 period so there were 60 analysis units. The research design is quantitative descriptive. The analysis technique in this research uses the panel data regression method. The research results show that management ownership, independent board ownership, and audit committee have no effect on profitability. Meanwhile, institutional ownership has a significant negative effect on profitability. The implication of this research is that companies must pay attention to institutional ownership shares, because they can have a negative impact on the company's profitability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Management & Organization Review is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In this paper, we investigate the role of institutional investors on firm value in Brazil. Given this purpose, we construct a longitudinal dataset of Brazilian companies in which 2,019 distinct institutional investors from 47 countries had equity holdings from 2009 to 2018. In contrast with previous studies, panel data regressions indicate that foreign institutional ownership decreases corporate value, even when we mitigate for endogeneity concerns through the generalized method of moments estimator. Additionally, the negative effect of foreign institutional ownership on firm value is greater during times of high political uncertainty. Our findings suggest that foreign institutional investors may induce family-controlling shareholders to adopt short-term strategies that destroy company value, which is consistent with the "locust foreign capital" view. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This research investigates whether institutional ownership contributes to enhancement of stock liquidity in emerging markets. The study examines data of listed companies on the Vietnamese stock market. Using a comprehensive data set for all stocks listed on Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange (HOSE) and Hanoi Stock Exchange (HNX) from 2008 to 2017, the statistical findings consistently demonstrate that institutional ownership has a negative impact on stock liquidity. In other words, the empirical evidence supports the adverse selection hypothesis that the upward trend of institutional ownership could reduce stock liquidity because the institutional investors with superior and advantageous information could exacerbate informational asymmetry issues. By using a case study in Vietnam, this research makes an original contribution to the academic literature by examining the relationship between institutional investors and stock liquidity in emerging markets. In addition, this study offers policymakers, authorities, agencies, and managers some insightful recommendations and implications that will help to not only promote the active participations of professional institutions but also improve stock liquidity, fairness, and efficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this research is to examine the effect of tax planning on earnings management using institutional ownership as a moderating variable. The data source for this research uses secondary data, the population of this research data is various manufacturing companies in various industrial sectors listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) during the 2015-2020 period. The data sample for this research is 60 samples from 10 companies that carried out Objective Sampling, namely sampling based on certain considerations. Data analysis was carried out using multiple linear statistics processed in SPSS version 25. Based on the results of research conducted using the T-test, it can be concluded that tax planning has no effect on income management and the moderating variable of institutional ownership cannot strengthen the relationship between tax planning and income management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study is to obtain empirical evidence of the, Managerial's Ownership, Institutional Ownership, independent board of commissioners, board of directors, and audit committee on the Banking Company firm's performance listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sampling technique used purposive sampling, the research samples obtained totaled 6 companies with a research period from 2018-2022 so that there were 30 units of analysis. The research design was quantitative descriptive. The analysis technique in this research is multiple regression analysis method. The results showed that Managerial's Ownership and Audit Committee has a significant positive effect, Institutional Ownership, independent board of commissioners, board of directors has no effect on firm's perfromance. The implication of this research is that companies must pay attention to that Managerial's Ownership and Audit Committee and those that can affect profitabilty so that company performance can increase. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the effect of the classification of origin country of institutional shareholder (domestic, developed and developing country) and its status on stock exchange (listed and unlisted) on environmental disclosure level in Indonesian companies. Design/methodology/approach: The data set comprises 474 non-financial firms listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) for the period of 2017 to 2019. The study uses an environmental disclosure checklist to measure the extent of environmental disclosure in companies' reports. Panel regression analysis technique is adopted to investigate the association between total percentage of shares held by institutional shareholders based on the classification of origin country and the status in stock exchange, and the extent of environmental disclosure. Findings: The study reveals that the extent of environmental disclosure is positively and significantly associated with institutional investors from domestic, developed countries, listed and unlisted institutional investors. Further analysis shows interesting results that institutions from developing countries have a negative and significant relationship with environmental disclosure in non-sensitive industries. Research limitations/implications: The authors recognize the issue of authors' subjectivity in the measurement process of environmental disclosure. The sample for this study encompasses Indonesian listed firms. Thus, the results may not be generalized to Indonesian unlisted firms and other countries or regions. Practical implications: This study suggests managers to engage more with institutional shareholders because they have greater concern for environmental disclosure practices. The current study also suggests managers to make strong environmental policies as they are important to ensure that institutional shareholders' investments are safe. Social implications: Given the positive impact institutional shareholders have on the level of environmental disclosure, it indirectly indicates that institutional shareholders have a strong motivation to make the world a better place. Originality/value: This study offers in-depth insights into the effect of institutional ownership on environmental disclosure based on the classification of origin country and listing status of institutional investors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the roles of intellectual capital efficiency and institutional ownership on cash holdings and their speed of adjustment. Design/methodology/approach: Using a sample of 432 firm-year observations of tourism-listed companies, three measures of cash holdings are used as dependent variables and intellectual capital efficiency and institutional ownership as independent variables. The financial data is collected from the S&P Capital IQ database for the period 2015–2020. Two system-generalized methods of moment estimation are used for the robustness checks of the results. Findings: The study provides evidence that an increase in intellectual capital efficiency in tourism firms results in lower cash holdings. The research findings also report that characteristics such as firm size, age and market-to-book value ratio are associated with cash holdings. Furthermore, institutional ownership in these firms did not affect the cash holdings. The results also confirm the existence of a target cash holding level to which the tourism firms attempt to converge. These results are robust to the alternative proxy of cash holding and endogeneity tests. Research limitations/implications: The study uses intellectual capital efficiency measured by the model proposed by Pulic. Alternative measures of intellectual capital can be included in future studies. Future research can also investigate the impact on cash holdings before and during the pandemic for tourism companies. The study is limited to the impact of institutional ownership; thus, research can be extended to consider other types of ownership. Practical implications: The findings of this study indicate that tourism companies should take into account the impact of intellectual capital efficiency on their cash holding decisions. The industry uses a specific financial management strategy in light of better efficiency and possibly values the opportunity cost of holding more cash. Additionally, regulators should re-examine the role of institutional ownership in tourism firms, as it was found to have no impact on cash holdings. The regulators may need to consider other factors, such as firm size and age, when developing policies and regulations to ensure that tourism firms have adequate cash holdings. Originality/value: This study adds to the body of knowledge on the factors that influence cash management and ideal cash levels for the tourism industry. The examination of the effect of intellectual capital on cash holdings is a novel contribution, filling a gap in the existing literature. The findings on the speed of adjustment towards optimal cash holdings also provide support for the trade-off theory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to examine the relationship between internal audit functions and the board of commissioners on financial performance with institutional ownership as a moderating variable. The research method involved all public banking sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period from 2020 to 2022, collecting 51 company-year observations. Based on the analysis of previous research results, it is shown that the internal audit function and the board of commissioners have a negative impact on the financial performance of the company. These findings indicate that the role of internal audit functions and boards of commissioners in providing value-added services related to financial performance in Indonesian public companies is relatively small. This research is expected to enhance the understanding of the roles of internal audit functions and boards of commissioners and to encourage the practice of internal audit functions in public financial sector companies in Indonesia to improve financial performance in their consultative roles, especially regarding ROA performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the impact of ownership by large shareholders (blockholders) on corporate cash holdings. The study further investigates heterogeneity in the relationship between blockholder ownership and corporate cash holdings. Design/methodology/approach: Building on the precautionary and agency motives of corporate cash holdings, the study focuses on publicly listed firms from 22 European countries for the period from 2006 to 2015. Multiple pooled ordinary least square and fixed effects regression models are employed to examine the relationship between blockholder ownership and firms' cash holdings. Findings: This study documents a positive relationship between blockholder ownership and corporate cash holdings which indicates the role of blockholders in influencing firms' cash holdings policies. However, further analyses show that the effect of blockholding on cash holdings depends on the type of blockholder. While the relationship is still positive between cash holdings and ownership by strategic blockholders, it turns negative for the ownership by institutional blockholders. Research limitations/implications: This study provides evidence for the important role played by firms' ownership structures, and especially blockholding, in shaping firms' cash holdings decisions. The findings are therefore of great value for investors, firms' management and board and policy makers. Originality/value: This paper contributes to the literature by providing an explanation of the contradictory results documented in the literature on the impact of blockholders on corporate cash holdings. This study, to the best of the author's knowledge, is the first to examine the effect of blockholder ownership on cash holdings by distinguishing between different types of blockholder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper studies the cost of capital effect of a major regulatory technology, or RegTech, event: the staggered implementation of the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) system of the Securities and Exchange Commission in the period from 1993 to 1996. This event represents a largely exogenous shock to corporate information dissemination technologies, resulting in a considerable reduction in information acquisition costs for investors. Using a difference-in-differences research design, we show that the cost of equity capital declines substantially after a firm switches from paper filing to mandatory electronic filing in EDGAR. The effect is stronger for small firms and firms with low analyst coverage and low institutional ownership. We identify three channels through which EDGAR affects a firm's cost of capital: the liquidity, risk-taking, and corporate governance channels. EDGAR implementation also improves a firm's investment efficiency significantly. We find evidence that the marginal value of a firm's capital investment and cash is higher during the post-EDGAR period. This paper was accepted by Suraj Srinivasan, accounting. Funding: C. Lin acknowledges financial support from the National Science Foundation of China [Grant 72192841] and the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administration Region, China [Project HKU R7054-18 and T35/710/20R]. S. Lai acknowledges financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [Grants 107-2410-H-002-038-MY3 and 110-2410-H-002-079-MY2] and the E. Sun Academic Award. X. Ma acknowledges research support from the University of Macau [Grants SRG2019-00158-FBA and MYRG2020-00259-FBA]. Supplemental Material: Data are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4660. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The study examines the quality of sustainability reporting (SR), the relationship between ownership structures (namely institutional ownership (IO), managerial ownership (MO), and family ownership (FO)) and SR, and the existence of a non-linear relationship between ownership structures and SR based on the inconsistent results of previous studies. The study collected secondary data from the annual and sustainability reports of 261 Malaysian public listed companies (PLCs) in 2018 and 2019 and analysed the data using content analysis. The results report a slight increment in the quality of SR in 2019, and using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression, it is found that only IO has a positive and significant association with SR, which indicates that companies with major institutional shareholdings attain superior SR quality. Further exploration reveals a curvilinear relationship (inverse U-shape) between IO and SR quality, whereby the effect declines when IO reaches a certain threshold. As such, these findings shed light on the changes in investors' motivation towards their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) commitment based on their company holdings, showing the delicate balance needed between oversight and the aligning of interests. This means that large institutional investors in a company should collaborate with management to advocate for policies and practices that support social and environmental objectives that are aligned with the company's long-term view of value creation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stocks can be mispriced for at least two reasons: value-relevant information is not timely incorporated or investor sentiment can induce mispricing. Using the mispricing measure proposed by Stambaugh, Yu, and Yuan (2015), we show that informed trading in the options market, proxied by the implied volatility spread, can substantially alleviate stock mispricing. Higher implied volatility spread reliably predicts subsequently lower stock mispricing after controlling for an array of economic variables including firm size, illiquidity, idiosyncratic volatility, institutional ownership, and investor’s divergence of opinions. In addition, this effect is more pronounced when the options trading volume is higher, consistent with the notion that higher options trading volume provides better camouflage for informed trading in the spirit of Kyle (1985). Our findings highlight the importance of information incorporation to reduce asset mispricing. We further show that a self-financing monthly portfolio that goes long on most underpriced stocks and short on most overpriced stocks when the implied volatility spread is the lowest yields statistically and economically significant abnormal returns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Contemporary Accounting Research is the property of Canadian Academic Accounting Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

We examine the effect of media competition on analyst forecast properties in an international setting using 113,436 firm-year observations from 32 countries spanning 2000 through 2012. We find that firms in countries with stronger media competition enjoy more accurate, less optimistically biased, and less dispersed analyst forecasts. The effects of media competition on the properties of analyst forecasts are stronger for firms with lower institutional ownership, for firms followed by fewer analysts or by analysts from smaller brokerage houses, and for firms with weaker financial performance. This suggests that media competition plays a more pronounced role in shaping the information environment when information from nonmedia channels is likely to be limited or of lower quality. Finally, we find that analysts in countries with stronger media competition tend to follow more firms, suggesting that stronger media competition reduces analysts' information acquisition costs, which in turn, improves the properties of their forecasts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Contemporary Accounting Research is the property of Canadian Academic Accounting Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose – As the influence of institutional investors over managerial decision-making grows, so does the importance of understanding the effect of institutional investor ownership (IO) on firm outcomes. The authors take a comprehensive approach to studying the effect of IO on earnings management (EM). Design/methodology/approach – The authors study the relation between IO and EM using a sample of 59,503 listed U.S. firm-year observations from 1981–2019. The authors proxy EM with earnings surprises and with accrual-based and real activity measures. The authors test for nonlinear relations and analyze changes resulting from the passage of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act. Findings – The findings support a positive IO-EM relation overall, but show that the relation is dynamic and heavily context-dependent with evidence of nonlinearity. The authors also find evidence that IO positively affects accrual-based EM and real activities EM negatively. Originality/value – To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study of the IO-EM relation to consider evidence of nonlinearity in the U.S. context, measuring changes to the relation over time, and with the use of several measures of EM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Addressing financial risks draws attention from both government and academia. Current studies primarily focus on the impact of CSR on stock-price crash risk, overlooking the regulatory role of institutional ownership and internal control, and the mediating effect of analyst coverage. This paper investigates the relationship between CSR and stock price crash risk using data from A-share listed companies (2015–2021). Findings suggest that better CSR helps reduce stock-price crash risk. The mediating effect test shows that improved CSR attracts analysts' attention and enhances information transparency, thus reducing stock-price crash risk. Institutional ownership, internal control and CSR have substitution relations in inhibiting stock-price crash risk. Further research shows CSR's significant role in reducing stock-price crash risk for non-state-owned, eastern regions, and non-Big Four audited enterprises. This study enriches literature on stock-price crash risk and CSR and guide firms in reducing stock-price crash risk, promoting capital market development and enhancing enterprise evaluation systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present study seeks to influence the impact of stock liquidity on the excess financial leverage emphasizing the moderating role of institutional shareholders. The scope of the study includes the firms listed in the Tehran Securities Exchange over 2012-2018, among which 202 firms were selected through systematic elimination and data was analyzed using a regression model. The present study is considered among applied research and is a correlation study. Desk research has been used to collect information and data while financial statements, explanatory notes, and the stock exchange monthly have been used to collect research data. Variance heterogeneity pre-tests, the F-Limer test, the Hausman test, and the Jarque-Bra test were used first to analyze data, and a multiple regression test was then used to confirm or reject the research hypothesis (Eviews software). Results indicated that stock liquidity has a significant influence on surplus financial leverage, while institutional ownership influenced the relationship between stock liquidity and surplus financial leverage significantly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examined the relationship between ownership structures and the level of corporate disclosure (LCD) among Tanzanian listed companies. Relationships between director, government, institutional and foreign ownership and LCD were examined. The 105 firm-year observations for 21 listed companies were examined from 2016 to 2020. The agency theory was used. An explanatory research design was employed. Data were gathered through balanced panel data using a survey method. Descriptive and inferential analysis using Ordinary Least Square was used. Descriptive and inferential analysis using Ordinary Least Square was used. The study found that director, government, and foreign ownership positively affect the LCD, while institutional ownership negatively affects it. This implied that in Tanzania, ownership structures were very important in determining LCD. The study concluded that Tanzania's LCD is moderate, and companies should disclose director ownership, establish independent oversight mechanisms, collaborate with foreign investors, and engage with institutional investors to align corporate governance practices with international standards. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Riwayat: Educational Journal of History & Humanities is the property of Riwayat: Educational Journal of History & Humanities and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Given the ubiquity of family businesses and the growing importance of ecological sustainability, it is crucial to promote family businesses to carry out green innovation activities and enhance their green innovation capability. In recent years, the prevalence of common institutional ownership in capital markets has attracted the attention of the academic community. Drawing on socioemotional wealth theory and strategic reference point theory, this paper tries to explore the impact of common institutional ownership on green innovation in family businesses. Using data from Chinese‐listed family businesses from 2009 to 2021, this paper finds that common institutional ownership can facilitate green innovation in family businesses. The higher the degree of their linkage and the greater the shareholding, the more pronounced the synergistic effect. The findings remained valid after considering the endogeneity issue and conducting robustness tests. The mechanism test suggests that common institutional ownership enhances green innovation in family businesses by improving the internal control quality and reducing financing constraints. This paper contributes to the study of how to effectively facilitate green innovation in family businesses by identifying the common institutional ownership from the perspective of external governance mechanisms. In addition, this paper enriches the research on the economic consequences of common institutional ownership. Finally, various practical implications for family businesses and policymakers may be realized, which may help family businesses to enhance their green innovation capabilities and contribute to the green transformation of society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This research was aimed to determine the effects of independent commissioners, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and audit committee, on the integrity of financial statements in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesian stock exchange. The analysis model used is panel data regression analysis and data processing using Eviews9. The sample in this research is 33 manufacturing companies in various industry sectors and the consumer goods industry sector in the 2017-2019 research year. The type of data in this study is secondary data with a sample selection method that is purposive sampling method. The results of this study indicate that the variables of independent commissioners, institutional ownership, and audit committee affect the integrity of financial statements, while managerial ownership variables do not affect the integrity of financial statements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Applying the principles of Good Corporate Governance is a major factor in building a solid and reliable corporate fundamentals to achieve sustainable corporate profitability. The aim of this research is to examine the influence of CSR and Independent Commissioners on Profitability which is moderated by Value Added Human Capital and Institutional Ownership. This study uses a quantitative method, where the data source used secondary data taken from the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The contribution of this research is the higher the proportion of independent commissioners, the more independent commissioners will carry out optimal supervision of operational activities. The board of independent commissioners greatly determines the company's success in achieving goals and improving the company's financial performance so that the company's ROA has increased. VAHC can weaken Komi's effect on ROA and is not significant. In principle, appropriate human capital activities can motivate Komi to achieve profitability. Institutional ownership affects company performance because institutional ownership can encourage more optimal supervision and monitoring mechanisms can guarantee shareholder prosperity, so institutional ownership will encourage managers to show good performance in front of shareholders. Institutional Ownership Contribution in moderating the influence of the Committee on ROA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We study the effect of managerial time horizon on two key operations decisions: inventory levels and capacity investment. For identification, we exploit a quasi‐natural experiment provided by the staggered adoption of constituency statutes, which alleviate managerial short‐termism by providing legal protection to executives adopting a long‐term approach in their corporate decisions. Using a staggered difference‐in‐differences design, we find that, after the reforms, firms incorporated in constituency states (treated firms) increased inventory and capacity investment by 5.2% and 15.4%, respectively, relative to firms not incorporated in constituency states (control firms). We also find that these increases are gradual and persist over time, suggesting that they are structural in nature. We further show that the effect of constituency statutes on inventory levels and capacity investment are stronger for firms with ex ante higher level of managerial short‐termism, such as firms with low institutional ownership. Performance also increases relatively more for affected firms with higher ex ante managerial short‐termism. Our results pass a battery of robustness and validity tests. Interestingly, while constituency statutes are intended to protect executives from short‐term oriented shareholder sanctions, our findings suggest that these statutes ultimately benefited not only executives, but also potentially the long‐term interest of shareholders. Even in the absence of regulation, executives facing short‐term pressure could intensify communication efforts with shareholders on how specific operational decisions and investments would be beneficial to the company. Notably, executives could use various media channels to help shape retail investors' attitude toward operational investments that may create future value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to the increasingly serious environmental pollution, stakeholders are paying more attention on the environmental behavior of enterprises. Our paper investigates how institutional investors affect the quality of corporate environmental information disclosure (EID). Using a sample of A-share listed firms from the heavily polluting industries in China during 2008 to 2016, we conduct correlation analysis, OLS regression, and Tobit regression methods and find that institutional investors' shareholdings are positively correlated with the quality of EID. When institutional investors increase 1% shareholdings of the firm, the EID quality improves by 0.03%. In addition, the high concentration of institutional ownership enhances the impact of institutional investors' shareholdings on the EID quality. But this positive correlation is only observed in companies in regions with a high marketization level. Our paper extends the research on the influential factors of EID and improves the understanding of the impact of institutional investors on corporate environmental behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Voluntary disclosure, especially disclosure of carbon emissions in mining companies, is still low. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of carbon emission disclosure on financial performance and to find out whether the ownership of institutions can moderate the impact of carbon emission disclosure on financial performance. The data for this study was collected from annual reports and sustainability reports. The sample for this research is 305 mining companies and transportation companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange and Malaysia Stock Exchange in 2018 - 2022. The research model used is moderated regression analysis (MRA). The research results show that carbon emission disclosure has a negative effect on financial performance and institutional ownership can moderate the effect of carbon emission disclosure on financial performance. Disclosure of carbon emissions is so expensive that some companies do not disclose it. Disclosing information about carbon would be an advantage for companies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This research explores the role of corporate governance, audit quality, and fiscal loss compensation in influencing tax avoidance strategies within firms in the Indonesian banking sector. Using financial statements and annual reports of companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2017-2021, we employed panel data regression analysis to investigate these relationships. The selection of companies was based on specific criteria, which are detailed within the paper. Our findings revealed that while independent commissioners and audit committees negatively affect tax avoidance, institutional ownership and audit quality had no significant impact. Interestingly, fiscal loss compensation was found to positively influence tax avoidance. Our study indicates that not all corporate governance mechanisms are effective in curbing tax avoidance in the banking sector. Additionally, we highlight the unintended consequences of fiscal loss compensation policies, which may facilitate tax avoidance. These findings have important implications for policy and governance in the banking sector. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aims to collect new empirical evidence to determine how different forms of ownership structure responded to the recent COVID-19 crisis. In light of this tragedy, it explores the relationship between ownership structure forms (i.e. block-holders, foreign, institutional and family ownerships) and audit quality (proxied by audit fees). Design/methodology/approach: In total, 3,200 firm-year observations for Jordanian enterprises covering the years 2005 through 2020 are used in an ordinary least squares regression with firm-clustered standard error to assess the hypotheses. Findings: The regression results showed that COVID-19 strengthens the association between each type of ownership (i.e. block-holders, foreign, institutional ownership forms) and audit quality. This result reflects the need for high-quality audit services during the pandemic by such owners to improve their business decisions and limit agency-conflict issues. However, the analysis failed to find any effect of COVID-19 when it comes to family ownership. Family-controlled firms may react faster in crisis situations, and correspondingly, they do not bear high audit costs. The extended analysis covering the years 2005–2022 came to the same results. Practical implications: The results aid authorities in their control and management of the auditing business. The findings have important consequences for policymakers, lawmakers, regulators and the audit profession as they assess the growing issues in an uncertain economic environment. Evidence is provided that may be used to reassure investors and aid authorities as they devise appropriate remedies to the pandemic-triggered economic crisis. The findings may aid in the improvement of legislation that governs Jordan's auditing industry. Furthermore, the results can be generalized to other Middle Eastern countries. Originality/value: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to empirically evaluate how different types of ownership affect audit quality in response to a dramatic shift in auditors' working conditions brought on by the global health calamity. In emerging economies like Jordan, this type of analysis allows for preliminary assumptions to be established about ownership status during the COVID-19 outbreak. It adds to the body of auditing knowledge by shedding light on how various kinds of ownership affect responses to adverse events. This assessment is intended to serve as the definitive testimony in the field of accounting regarding the effects of the coronavirus across various corporations' portfolios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examines the impact of heterogeneous foreign institutional investors on innovation in Chinese listed firms from 2009 to 2020. Empirical results indicate that foreign institutional investors from regions with high cultural distance are associated with a significant increase in corporate innovation of Chinese firms. Moreover, the results remain robust to alternative cultural distance measures and methods that address endogeneity. This research provides novel evidence regarding the role of foreign institutional investors in China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to determine the effect of corporate governance on tax avoidance, the effect of sales growth and the effect of capital intensity on tax avoidance in pharmaceutical manufacturing companies in the consumer goods sector listed on the IDX in 2020-2022. This study uses quantitative methods and focuses on hypothesis testing by using numerical variable analysis and statistical data analysis in manufacturing companies in the pharmaceutical consumer goods subsector listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX). The type of research data used in this study is secondary data. The analysis method uses descriptive analysis, classical assumption test, and research hypothesis testing with a sample population of 10 companies. The results showed that corporate governance proxy independent board of commissioners has a positive impact on tax evasion, proxy institutional ownership has a negative influence on tax evasion, sales growth has a positive impact on tax avoidance, and capital intensity has a positive influence on tax avoidance from manufacturing companies in the pharmaceutical sector consumer goods sector in 2020-2022. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]