901. Influence of <scp>D</scp>‐amphetamine, Benactyzine, and Chlorpromazine on Performance on an Auditory Vigilance Task
- Author
-
E. A. Alluisi, Glenn R. Hawkes, W. O. Evans, and Michel Loeb
- Subjects
Benactyzine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Acoustics and Ultrasonics ,medicine.drug_class ,business.industry ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Audiology ,Placebo ,Tranquilizer ,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) ,medicine ,Anticholinergic ,Amphetamine ,Response criteria ,business ,Chlorpromazine ,medicine.drug ,Vigilance (psychology) ,media_common - Abstract
Detections, false responses, and response latencies were measured for subjects monitoring auditory signals (more‐intense noise pulses in a periodic‐noise pulse train) over a 1‐h period following administration of a stimulating drug (D‐amphetamine), an antiadrenergic tranquilizer (chlorpromazine), an anticholinergic tranquilizer (benactyzine), and a placebo. It was tentatively concluded that changes in performance over time following administration of the placebo could be explained in terms of shifts in subjects' criteria for responding and that, following administration of the tranquilizer, shifts both in effective sensitivity and response criteria were occurring. Following injection of D‐amphetamine, performance remained relatively constant throughout the monitoring period.
- Published
- 1965