501. Management of suspected pulmonary embolism patients with low clinical and low V/Q probability.
- Author
-
Salaun PY, Le Duc-Pennec A, Le Gal G, Couturaud F, Guillo P, Mottier D, Bizais Y, and Leroyer C
- Subjects
- Algorithms, Angiography methods, Anticoagulants pharmacology, Anticoagulants therapeutic use, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Perfusion, Probability, Risk, Thromboembolism diagnosis, Thromboembolism therapy, Treatment Outcome, Ultrasonography methods, Pulmonary Embolism diagnosis, Pulmonary Embolism diagnostic imaging, Radionuclide Imaging methods, Ventilation-Perfusion Ratio
- Abstract
Objective: To assess whether guidelines for the management of suspected PE, recommending that ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy should be followed by other imaging in case of non-diagnostic result, and interpreted along with the clinical probability, are applied in daily practice., Design: Two-year audit study., Setting: Tertiary hospital in France., Participants: All patients referred to the nuclear medicine department for a suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), with a low clinical probability, a positive D-Dimer test, and a low V/Q scintigraphy., Intervention: We reviewed medical records to collect data on further diagnostic strategy and therapeutic management., Main Outcome Measure: Thromboembolic risk during a three-month follow up in patients who did not undergo anticoagulation therapy on the basis of a negative diagnostic work up., Results: Of the 456 selected patients, PE was excluded on the basis of a low pretest probability and a low V/Q scintigraphy probability without further testing in 184 (group 1). In the other 272 patients (group 2), 4 venous thromboembolism (VTE) events were diagnosed by leg vein ultrasonography and/or computed tomography pulmonary angiography. In patients who did not receive anticoagulant treatment during follow up, one patient from group 1 (0.6%, 95% confidence interval 0.1 to 3.3) and two patients from group 2 (0.9%, 95% CI 0.2 to 3.2) had an acute venous thromboembolic event., Conclusion: Different attitudes are adopted by physicians in patients with a low clinical probability and a low V/Q scintigraphy probability, without impact on safety, as assessed by a non-significant difference in the three-month thromboembolic risks between these two groups.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF