451. Differential requirements for the Pax6(5a) genes eyegone and twin of eyegone during eye development in Drosophila.
- Author
-
Yao JG, Weasner BM, Wang LH, Jang CC, Weasner B, Tang CY, Salzer CL, Chen CH, Hay B, Sun YH, and Kumar JP
- Subjects
- Animals, Animals, Genetically Modified, Base Sequence, DNA genetics, DNA metabolism, DNA Primers genetics, DNA-Binding Proteins chemistry, Drosophila Proteins chemistry, Drosophila melanogaster embryology, Drosophila melanogaster metabolism, Eye embryology, Eye metabolism, Eye Proteins chemistry, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Homeodomain Proteins chemistry, In Situ Hybridization, PAX5 Transcription Factor chemistry, PAX6 Transcription Factor, Paired Box Transcription Factors chemistry, Protein Structure, Tertiary, RNA, Messenger genetics, RNA, Messenger metabolism, Recombinant Fusion Proteins genetics, Repressor Proteins chemistry, DNA-Binding Proteins genetics, Drosophila Proteins genetics, Drosophila melanogaster genetics, Drosophila melanogaster growth & development, Eye growth & development, Eye Proteins genetics, Genes, Insect, Homeodomain Proteins genetics, PAX5 Transcription Factor genetics, Paired Box Transcription Factors genetics, Repressor Proteins genetics
- Abstract
In eye development the tasks of tissue specification and cell proliferation are regulated, in part, by the Pax6 and Pax6(5a) proteins respectively. In vertebrates, Pax6(5a) is generated as an alternately spliced isoform of Pax6. This stands in contrast to the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, which has two Pax6(5a) homologs that are encoded by the eyegone and twin of eyegone genes. In this report we set out to determine the respective contributions that each gene makes to the development of the fly retina. Here we demonstrate that both eyg and toe encode transcriptional repressors, are expressed in identical patterns but at significantly different levels. We further show, through a molecular dissection of both proteins, that Eyg makes differential use of several domains when compared to Toe and that the number of repressor domains also differs between the two Pax6(5a) homologs. We predict that these results will have implications for elucidating the functional differences between closely related members of other Pax subclasses.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF