Search

Squamous cell head and neck cancer is a relatively uncommon malignancy in North America. Nonetheless, it has been of considerable interest to medical oncologists because of its remarkable sensitivity to systemic chemotherapy. Even in patients with relapsed or metastatic disease, meaningful tumour shrinkage can be achieved with systemic therapy. This has led to the performance of carefully conducted clinical trials exploring the role of systemic chemotherapy, not only in the palliative setting, but as part of definitive multi-modality treatment. Chemotherapy has been used as the initial (or induction) treatment, as an adjuvant treatment after definitive surgery and/or radiation, and concurrent with both definitive and adjuvant radiation therapy. Evidence-based conclusions have been drawn from these clinical trials and have led to significant changes in the current standards of care for this disease. In this article, the available data supporting the use of systemic chemotherapy as palliative treatment, and as part of the definitive management for this disease will be reviewed.

Objective: We sought to determine whether chemoradiotherapy after esophagectomy improves survival., Methods: From 1994 to 2000, 31 patients with locoregionally advanced esophageal carcinoma (90% pT3, 81% pN1, and 13% pM1a) received postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Concurrently, 52 patients with advanced carcinoma underwent esophagectomy alone and survived at least 10 weeks, the time frame for adjuvant therapy. A propensity score based on demographic, tumor, and surgical factors was used to identify matched pairs to determine the association of adjuvant therapy with outcomes., Results: For patients receiving adjuvant therapy versus esophagectomy alone, risk-unadjusted median, 1-year, and 4-year survivals were 28 versus 14 months, 68% +/- 8.4% versus 60% +/- 6.8%, and 44% +/- 9.0% versus 17% +/- 5.6%, respectively (P =.05). Similarly, risk-unadjusted median time to recurrence was 25 versus 13 months (P =.15), and median recurrence-free survival was 22 versus 11 months (P =.04). Among propensity-matched patients, median, 1-year, and 4-year survivals for those receiving adjuvant therapy versus esophagectomy were 28 versus 15 months, 60% +/- 11.0% versus 65% +/- 10.7%, and 44% +/- 11.3% versus 0% (P =.05). Median time to recurrence was 25 versus 13 months (P =.04), and recurrence-free survival was 22 versus 10 months (P =.02)., Conclusion: In patients with locoregionally advanced esophageal carcinoma, addition of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy to esophagectomy alone doubled survival time, time to recurrence, and recurrence-free survival. Patients with locoregionally advanced carcinoma after esophagectomy should be considered for adjuvant therapy.

Background: The role of neck dissection (ND) after definitive chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell head and neck cancer is incompletely defined. We retrospectively reviewed 109 patients with N2-N3 disease treated with chemoradiotherapy to identify predictors of a clinical complete response in the neck (CCR-neck), pathologic complete response after ND (PCR-neck), and regional failure., Method: All patients were given 4-day continuous infusions of 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2/d) and cisplatin (20 mg/m2/d) during the first and fourth weeks of either once daily (n = 68) or twice daily (n = 41) radiation therapy. ND was considered for all patients after completion of chemoradiotherapy and was performed in 32 of the 65 patients achieving a CCR-neck after chemoradiotherapy and in all 44 patients with residual clinical evidence of neck disease. CCR-neck, PCR-neck, and regional failure were then correlated with potential predictors, including T, N, largest lymph node size (<3 cm, > or =3 cm), primary tumor site, and radiation fractionation schedule., Results: Achievement of a CCR-neck was predicted by N, N2 vs N3 (53 of 80 vs 12 of 29, p =.019) and by largest lymph node size, <3 cm vs > or =3 cm (19 of 25 vs 46 of 84, p =.06). Achievement of a PCR-neck could not be predicted by any clinical parameter. Regional failure occurred both in patients undergoing ND and those not dissected (5 of 76 vs 4 of 33, p =.33) and proved more likely only in the ND patients with residual positive pathology compared with those achieving a PCR-neck (5 of 25 vs 0 of 51, p <.001). Primary site was not a useful predictor of CCR-neck, PCR-neck, or regional failure. Most importantly, CCR-neck (vs

Objectives: This study was undertaken to assess accelerated multimodality therapy in patients with IIIA and IIIB non-small cell lung cancer in terms of toxicity, feasibility, response, survival, and recurrence (value) and to identify predictors of pathologic response and improved survival., Methods: Between October 1994 and September 2000, a total of 105 patients with stage pIIIA (n = 78) or pIIIB (n = 27) non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled in a study of accelerated multimodality therapy, consisting of hyperfractionated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy (paclitaxel and cisplatin) followed by resection and postoperative chemoradiation. Multivariable correlates of pathologic response and survival were assessed., Results: Toxic effects related to induction therapy necessitated hospitalization in 40% of patients (n = 42); treatment-related mortality was 9% (n = 9). With respect to feasibility, 100% of patients completed induction therapy, 93% (n = 98) of cancers were operable, 79% (n = 83) of cancers were curatively resectable, and 77% (n = 81) of patients completed all therapy. Sterilization of mediastinal nodes was similar (P =.6) for pN2 (35%) and pN3 (30%) disease. Median, 2-year, and 5-year survivals were 27 months, 53%, and 32%, respectively. Locoregional recurrence, distant recurrence, and both were seen in 6% (n = 6), 45% (n = 47), and 3% (n = 3) of patients, respectively. Pathologic response was not predictable. Nodal status predicted incrementally decreasing survival for patients with cancers downstaged to ypN0 or ypN1 (n = 35) versus ypN2 (n = 44) versus ypN3 (n = 20; P <.001). In addition, advancing age, squamous histologic type, and higher pT predicted poorer survival., Conclusions: Accelerated multimodality therapy is equally valuable in IIIA and IIIB non-small cell lung cancers. Despite unpredictable response to induction therapy, younger patients and those with nonsquamous histologic type, sterilization of mediastinal lymph nodes, and lower pT benefit most. A ypN2 stage reduces but does not preclude long-term survival.

There are over 200,000 cases of brain metastases (BrM) every year, but very few are from esophageal cancer primaries. In order to determine predictors for outcome of these patients, the authors conducted a retrospective review of twenty-seven patients with BrM from esophageal carcinoma diagnosed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between 1991 and 2001. For the entire cohort, median follow-up and median survival was 3.6 months and 3.6 months, respectively. On univariate analysis, patients with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) >/= 70, low recursive partitioning analysis score, single BrM, no systemic disease, and aggressive treatment [surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) + whole brain radiation (WBRT), SRS + surgery + WBRT, surgery + WBRT)] had a significantly improved survival. In a multivariate model, patients with higher KPS and aggressive treatment had improved survival. The 1-year survival for the WBRT alone group and the aggressive treatment group was 6%, and 36% respectively. We conclude that based on the data presented here, patients with BrM from esophageal cancer have poor outcome. Aggressive treatment and favorable KPS are associated with longer survival for selected patients. We recommend esophageal cancer patients with BrM be enrolled in clinical trials to better delineate the role of treatment and potentially improve results.

Objective: Cancer staging is dynamic, reflecting accrual of knowledge and experience in treatment. The objectives of this study were to assess current esophageal cancer staging and to determine whether refinements of classification and stage grouping are necessary., Methods: From 1983 through November 2000, 480 patients underwent esophagectomy without induction therapy. Depth of tumor invasion (T), regional lymph node status (N), distant status (M), number of metastatic regional lymph nodes, and histopathologic type and grade were subjected to survival-tree analysis, multivariable Cox and hazard function analysis, and residual misclassification risk analysis., Results: Inhomogenity of survival was found within and lack of distinction was found between current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging groups, supporting the need for refinement. T1 and N1 were redefined on the basis of survival differences. T1a is intramucosal cancer, T1b is submucosal cancer (P =.008), N1 is 1 or 2 metastatic regional lymph nodes, and N2 is 3 or more metastatic regional lymph nodes (P =.01). Current subclassification of M1 is not warranted (P =.9). Histopathologic type (P =.17) and grade (P =.3) minimally refined staging. Reassignment of staging groups constrained by American Joint Committee on Cancer definitions of stages 0 and IV produced less monotonic, distinctive, and homogeneous survival than free assignment of staging groups., Conclusions: Current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging of esophageal cancer is inadequate. Refinement requires redefinition of T1, N1, and M1 classifications. Stage grouping within the constraints of American Joint Committee on Cancer definitions produces less accurate prognosis than free assignment based on survival data.

Objective: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical staging of depth of tumor invasion (cT), the relationship of cT to survival, the benefits of downstaging cT, and the role of cT in treatment decisions., Methods: The accuracy of determining T by means of endoscopic ultrasonography and the relationship of cT to survival were assessed in 209 patients undergoing esophagectomy alone for esophageal carcinoma. The benefit of downstaging cT was assessed in 128 patients undergoing induction therapy and esophagectomy. The role of cT in treatment decisions was determined by integrating these results with the results of previous work., Results: Compared with pathologic T (pT), cT was 87% accurate, 82% sensitive, 91% specific, 89% positively predictive, and 86% negatively predictive of tumors confined to (< or =T2) or invading beyond (>T2) the esophageal wall. In cN0, increasing cT was predictive of progressively poorer survival. For each category of pT N0, cT accurately predicted survival, except for pT3, which was underestimated (P <.0001). In cN0, downstaging by induction therapy was beneficial only if tumors invaded beyond the wall (> or =cT3, P =.0003). In cN1, it was beneficial only when downstaging was synchronous in cT3/T4 (P <.001)., Conclusions: cT should be the principal determinant of treatment in cN0. In cN0, if endoscopic ultrasonography identifies tumors of greater than cT2, multimodality therapy should be considered. However, only when cT3/T4 tumors are downstaged to pT2 or less will patients benefit, but their survival will not equal that of patients with tumors of cT2 or less having esophagectomy alone. If endoscopic ultrasonography identifies tumors of cT2 or less, esophagectomy alone should be used because induction therapy might adversely affect survival.

Successful management of squamous cell cancer of the oropharynx must address two, sometimes conflicting, treatment goals. The first goal is disease eradication, and the second is preservation of oropharyngeal function. For early cancers, definitive surgical excision often represents the most effective and least morbid approach. When surgery is likely to result in functional deficits of speech or swallowing, definitive radiation therapy can also be used successfully. Often the choice of treatment modality is based on institutional expertise and bias. However, for the more frequent patients with advanced disease, treatment choices become more complex. Historically, surgery and radiation therapy have been used together, often with suboptimal control of locoregional disease and significant long-term functional deficits, reflecting surgical excision, radiation-induced long-term toxicities, and any initial functional impairment resulting from the tumor. The addition of systemic chemotherapy to definitive radiation has now been demonstrated to produce a significant survival benefit for patients with advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer originating in the oropharynx and elsewhere. Although there are still specific indications for primary surgical resection, the use of chemotherapy and radiation has become a standard of care for the management of patients with this disease, with surgery often reserved for salvage of those who fail definitive nonoperative treatment. Debate continues as to the best tolerated and most successful combination of chemotherapy drugs, radiation fractionation schema, and coordination of treatment modalities; however, a reproducible survival benefit has been demonstrated only for the concomitant, platinum-based treatment schedules. The focus of future investigation must be on optimizing these multimodality approaches, minimizing toxicities and functional deficits while maximizing treatment success. It is hoped that the addition of the newer therapeutic approaches, including epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition and gene therapy, may further improve the results of more traditional treatment combinations. Continued enrollment of patients in well-designed and conducted clinical trials is of paramount importance.

Purpose: The Head and Neck Intergroup conducted a phase III randomized trial to test the benefit of adding chemotherapy to radiation in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer., Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were randomly assigned between arm A (the control), single daily fractionated radiation (70 Gy at 2 Gy/d); arm B, identical radiation therapy with concurrent bolus cisplatin, given on days 1, 22, and 43; and arm C, a split course of single daily fractionated radiation and three cycles of concurrent infusional fluorouracil and bolus cisplatin chemotherapy, 30 Gy given with the first cycle and 30 to 40 Gy given with the third cycle. Surgical resection was encouraged if possible after the second chemotherapy cycle on arm C and, if necessary, as salvage therapy on all three treatment arms. Survival data were compared between each experimental arm and the control arm using a one-sided log-rank test., Results: Between 1992 and 1999, 295 patients were entered on this trial. This did not meet the accrual goal of 362 patients and resulted in premature study closure. Grade 3 or worse toxicity occurred in 52% of patients enrolled in arm A, compared with 89% enrolled in arm B (P <.0001) and 77% enrolled in arm C (P <.001). With a median follow-up of 41 months, the 3-year projected overall survival for patients enrolled in arm A is 23%, compared with 37% for arm B (P =.014) and 27% for arm C (P = not significant)., Conclusion: The addition of concurrent high-dose, single-agent cisplatin to conventional single daily fractionated radiation significantly improves survival, although it also increases toxicity. The loss of efficacy resulting from split-course radiation was not offset by either multiagent chemotherapy or the possibility of midcourse surgery.

Objectives: This study was undertaken to identify management strategies that maximize survival of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer and metachronous brain metastases and to determine whether any apparent improved survival was due to treatment or simply to patient selection., Methods: Treatment evaluations of both primary non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases were performed in 91 patients. Optimal treatment was identified by multivariable analysis. Propensity scoring and multivariable analysis were used to separate treatment benefit from patient selection., Results: Risk-unadjusted median, 12-, and 24-month survivals were 5.2 months, 22%, and 10%, respectively. Younger age (P =.006), good performance status (P =.003), stage IIIA (P =.001), lung resection (P =.02), no other systemic metastases at time of diagnosis of brain metastases (P =.02), and either metastasectomy (P <.001) or stereotactic radiosurgery (P <.001) predicted best survival. However, metastasectomy or stereotactic radiosurgery was more common after lung resection (P =.02) and in patients with good performance status (P =.006), no other systemic metastases at time of diagnosis of brain metastases (P =.01), and fewer brain metastases (P <.001), suggesting that the patients with the best risk profile were selected for aggressive therapy of both lung primary and brain metastases. Despite this selection, analysis of propensity-matched patients demonstrated the benefit of lung resection and metastasectomy or stereotactic radiosurgery (P <.001)., Conclusions: Younger patients with resected stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer who have isolated metachronous brain metastases and good performance status do best when treated with metastasectomy or stereotactic radiosurgery. This survival benefit is a brain treatment effect, not the result of selecting the best patients for aggressive therapy.

The low surgical cure rate in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer has prompted an exploration of multimodality treatment strategies. Mature results are presented from a phase II trial of accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy, concurrent paclitaxel/cisplatin chemotherapy and surgery for these patients. Between 1994 and 1997, 45 patients with surgically demonstrated stage III non-small cell lung cancer underwent induction treatment with a 96 h continuous cisplatin infusion (20 mg/m(2) per day) and a 24 h infusion of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) given concurrently with accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy (1.5 Gy twice daily) to a total dose of 30 Gy. Induction was completed in ten treatment (12 total) days. Surgical resection was scheduled 4 weeks later with a second identical course of chemoradiotherapy given 4-6 weeks post-operatively, to a total radiation dose of 60-63 Gy. Thirty-five patients had stage III(A) disease and ten had stage III(B) disease (eight with N(3) tumors). Induction toxicity included nausea in 89%, dysphagia in 89%, and neutropenia <1000/mm(3) in 84% which required hospitalization for fever in 40%. There were no toxic deaths during induction. About 40 of the 45 patients (89%) were operable and 32 (71%) were resectable for cure. A pathologic response was identified in 22 patients (49%); five patients (11%) had no residual disease. Fourteen patients (31%) were downstaged to mediastinal node negativity. With a median follow-up of 60 months, the Kaplan-Meier projected 5-year overall survival was 29%; locoregional control 79%; and distant metastatic disease control 38%. The projected 5-year survival for the 14 patients downstaged to mediastinal node negativity was 50%. For the 19 patients with residual ipsilateral mediastinal node involvement at surgery it was 32%. This short-course of paclitaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy and concurrent accelerated fractionation radiation is tolerable despite significant myelosuppression. Locoregional control is excellent and survival is better than historical expectations. Patients downstaged to mediastinal node negativity have a prognosis similar to those with de novo stage I(B) and II disease. Distant metastases are the major cause of treatment failure.

Purpose: Results are reported from an aggressive chemoradiotherapy protocol for advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer were treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (72 Gy at 1.2 Gy twice per day) and two courses of concurrent chemotherapy with fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m(2)/d) and cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d), both given as 96-hour continuous intravenous infusions during weeks 1 and 4 of radiation therapy. Primary-site resection was reserved for residual or recurrent primary-site disease after chemoradiotherapy. Neck dissection was considered for N2 or greater disease, irrespective of clinical response, and for residual or recurrent neck disease after nonoperative treatment., Results: Forty-one patients with stage IV disease were treated. Toxicity was significant, with grade 3 to 4 mucositis in 98%, dysphagia in 88%, and skin reaction in 85%. Neutropenic fever requiring hospitalization occurred in 51%. Despite feeding tube placement in 35 patients (85%), the mean weight loss during chemoradiotherapy was 13.3% of initial body weight. One patient died during treatment as a result of a pulmonary embolus. At a median follow-up period of 30 months, the 3-year Kaplan-Meier projected overall survival was 59%, disease-specific survival 69%, likelihood of local control without surgical resection 91%, and local control with surgical resection 97%. The likelihood of distant disease control at 3 years was 74%, and distant metastases were present in eight of 13 patients who died., Conclusion: This chemoradiotherapy schedule produces considerable but manageable toxicity. Survival and organ preservation are excellent for this poor-prognosis patient cohort. Distant metastases are the most common cause of treatment failure.