Search

The KEYNOTE-659 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line pembrolizumab plus S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) (cohort 1) or S-1 and cisplatin (SP) (cohort 2) for advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer in Japan. Herein, we update the results of cohort 1 and describe the results of cohort 2. This open-label phase IIb study enrolled patients with advanced programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive (combined positive score ≥ 1) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. The primary end-point was the objective response rate (ORR). Other end-points were duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. One hundred patients were enrolled. In cohorts 1 and 2, median follow-up time was 16.9 and 17.1 months; ORR (central review), 72.2% and 80.4%; DOR, 10.6 and 9.5 months; DCR (central review), 96.3% and 97.8%; median PFS (central review), 9.4 and 8.3 months; and median OS, 16.9 and 17.1 months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in all patients, including peripheral sensory neuropathy (94.4%, cohort 1), decreased neutrophil count (82.6%, cohort 2), nausea (59.3% and 60.9% in cohorts 1 and 2), and decreased appetite (61.1% and 60.9% in cohorts 1 and 2). Grade 3 or higher TRAEs were reported by 59.3% (cohort 1) and 78.3% (cohort 2), including decreased platelet count (14.8%, cohort 1) and decreased neutrophil count (52.2%, cohort 2). Pembrolizumab in combination with SOX or SP showed favorable efficacy and safety in patients with PD-L1-positive, HER2-negative G/GEJ adenocarcinoma., (© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Objective: Many clinical trials for older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have been conducted, and fluoropyrimidine and bevacizumab are standard treatments. However, the relationship between age and the efficacy and safety of this treatment is unclear in older metastatic colorectal cancer patients., Methods: Individual data from two phase II studies on older (≥75 years), non-frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with uracil-tegafur/leucovorin or S-1 combined with bevacizumab were collected. Patient characteristics were evaluated with multiple regression analyses for survival outcomes, using the Cox proportional hazard model and linear regression analyses for the worst grade of adverse events., Results: We enrolled 102 patients with a median age of 80 years (range, 75-88 years). Of the 70 patients who died, seven (10%) died of causes unrelated to disease or treatment. The study treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 19 patients (18.6%), with 63% aged ≥85 years. The adverse event that most commonly resulted in treatment discontinuation was grade 2 fatigue (21%). Chronological age was not associated with progression-free survival (Hazard ratio, 1.03; P = 0.40) or overall survival (Hazard ratio, 1.02; P = 0.65). Age was weakly associated with non-hematologic adverse events (regression coefficient [R], 0.27; P = 0.007), especially fatigue (R, 0.23; P = 0.02) and nausea (R, 0.19; P = 0.06), but not with hematologic (R, 0.05; P = 0.43) or bevacizumab-related (R, -0.06; P = 0.56) adverse events., Conclusions: The efficacy of fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab was age-independent in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer aged ≥75 years, and attention should be paid to non-hematologic adverse events as age increases., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.)

Background: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and irinotecan are treatment options for heavily pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer, but their efficacies are limited. We investigated the combination of FTD/TPI and irinotecan for such patients., Methods: Patients who were refractory to fluoropyrimidine, platinum and taxane were enrolled into four cohorts (Level 1A/1B/2A/2B) and treated with irinotecan (100 [Level 1] or 125 [Level 2] mg/m 2 on days 1 and 15) and FTD/TPI (35 mg/m 2 /dose, twice daily, on days 1-5 and 8-12 [Level A] or on days 1-5 and days 15-19 [Level B]) of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoints were the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and recommended phase II dose (RP2D); the secondary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR)., Results: Eleven patients were enrolled: 2 at Level 1A, 3 at Level 1B, and 6 at Level 2B. DLTs occurred in 2/2 patients at Level 1A and 2/6 patients at Level 2B. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (90.9%), leukopenia (54.5%), anemia (45.5%) and febrile neutropenia (18.2%). One patient at Level 2B achieved a partial response, and the DCR was 72.7% (95% CI, 39.0%-94.0%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival periods were 3.0 months (95% CI, 0.92-not reached) and 10.2 months (95% CI, 2.2-not reached), respectively., Conclusion: The RP2D of FTD/TPI combined with irinotecan was determined to be Level 1B; this level was associated with manageable hematologic toxicities and feasible non-hematologic toxicities. Further evaluation of the efficacy of RP2D treatment is necessary., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective S-1 and modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) were often used as the second-line chemotherapies after failure of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) in unresectable pancreatic cancer (UPC) until nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin therapy was approved as an alternative in Japan in 2020. However, the clinical outcomes of S-1 and mFFX after GnP have scarcely been reported. Therefore, we retrospectively studied them. Methods We extracted the clinical data of 86 patients with UPC who received second-line chemotherapy after GnP between 2015 and 2020. Among the patients who had a good organ functions and no massive ascites, 41 patients treated with S-1 and 21 treated with mFFX were enrolled. Results Compared to S-1, mFFX tended to be used for younger patients with a good general condition (median age, 63 vs. 71 years, p<0.01; and performance status 0, 67% vs. 37%, p<0.05). The median progression-free and overall survival were similar between the S-1 (3.7 and 7.2 months, respectively) and mFFX (3.3 and 7.4 months, respectively) groups. The response rate in patients with measurable lesions was 4% (n=1/23) in the S-1 group and 17% (n=2/12) in the mFFX group. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 20% in the S-1 group and 57% (neutrophil count decreased in 43%) in the mFFX group (p<0.01). Conclusion S-1 and mFFX were both acceptable second-line chemotherapies after GnP therapy for UPC, although attention should be paid to myelosuppression during mFFX treatment. Further studies involving nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin therapy are necessary to facilitate the selection of the optimal regimen for each patient.

The applicability of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genotyping to inform enrollment of patients with cancer in clinical trials has not been established. We conducted a phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification prospectively confirmed by tumor tissue or ctDNA analysis ( UMIN000027887 ). HER2 amplification was confirmed in tissue and/or ctDNA in 30 patients with mCRC. The study met the primary endpoint with a confirmed objective response rate of 30% in 27 tissue-positive patients and 28% in 25 ctDNA-positive patients, as compared to an objective response rate of 0% in a matched real-world reference population treated with standard-of-care salvage therapy. Post hoc exploratory analyses revealed that baseline ctDNA genotyping of HER2 copy number and concurrent oncogenic alterations adjusted for tumor fraction stratified patients according to efficacy with similar accuracy to tissue genotyping. Decreased ctDNA fraction 3 weeks after treatment initiation associated with therapeutic response. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab showed similar efficacy in patients with mCRC with HER2 amplification in tissue or ctDNA, showing that ctDNA genotyping can identify patients who benefit from dual-HER2 blockade as well as monitor treatment response. These findings warrant further use of ctDNA genotyping in clinical trials for HER2-amplified mCRC, which might especially benefit patients in first-line treatment., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

The phase III AXEPT study showed the noninferiority of modified capecitabine plus irinotecan (mXELIRI) with or without bevacizumab relative to fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) with or without bevacizumab as a second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. We evaluated the associations between the UGT1A1 genotype linked to adverse events-caused by irinotecan-and the efficacy and safety of mXELIRI and FOLFIRI. The UGT1A1 genotype was prospectively determined and patients were categorized into three groups according to WT (*1/*1), single heterozygous (SH; *28/*1 or *6/*1), and double heterozygous or homozygous (DHH; *28/*28, *6/*6, or *28/*6). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, response rate, and safety were assessed. The UGT1A1 genotype was available in all 650 randomized patients (WT, 309 [47.5%]; SH, 291 [44.8%]; DHH, 50 [7.7%]). The median OS was 15.9, 17.7, and 10.6 months in the WT, SH, and DHH groups, respectively, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-2.09; P = .008) for DHH vs WT or SH. The median OS in the mXELIRI and FOLFIRI arms was 18.1 vs 14.3 months (HR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.62-1.03) in the WT group, 16.3 vs 18.3 months (HR 1.04; 95% CI, 0.79-1.36) in the SH group, and 13.0 vs 9.1 months (HR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.39-1.31) in the DHH group, respectively. Modified capecitabine plus irinotecan with or without bevacizumab could be a standard second-line chemotherapy in terms of efficacy and safety regardless of the UGT1A1 genotype., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Purpose: FGFR2 amplification is associated with poor prognosis in advanced gastric cancer and its subclonal heterogeneity has been revealed. Here, we examined whether circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was useful for detecting FGFR2 amplification and co-occurring resistance mechanisms in advanced gastric cancer., Experimental Design: We assessed genomic characteristics of FGFR2 -amplified advanced gastric cancer in a nationwide ctDNA screening study. We also analyzed FGFR2 amplification status in paired tissue and plasma samples with advanced gastric cancer. In addition, we examined patients with FGFR2 -amplified advanced gastric cancer identified by ctDNA sequencing who received FGFR inhibitors., Results: FGFR2 amplification was more frequently detected by ctDNA sequencing in 28 (7.7%) of 365 patients with advanced gastric cancer than by tissue analysis alone (2.6%-4.4%). FGFR2 amplification profiling of paired tissue and plasma revealed that FGFR2 amplification was detectable only by ctDNA sequencing in 6 of 44 patients, which was associated with a worse prognosis. Two patients in whom FGFR2 amplification was detected by ctDNA sequencing after tumor progression following previous standard chemotherapies but not by pretreatment tissue analysis had tumor responses to FGFR inhibitors. A third patient with FGFR2 and MET co-amplification in ctDNA showed a limitation of benefit from FGFR inhibition, accompanied by a marked increase in the MET copy number., Conclusions: ctDNA sequencing identifies FGFR2 amplification missed by tissue testing in patients with advanced gastric cancer, and these patients may respond to FGFR inhibition. The utility of ctDNA sequencing warrants further evaluation to develop effective therapeutic strategies for patients with FGFR2 -amplified advanced gastric cancer., (©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Cancer treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs) often induces severe xerotic dermatitis. Various irritants facilitate development of dermatitis in xerotic skin. As zinc deficiency plays a role in the development of irritant dermatitis, we measured serum zinc levels in 25 patients with xerotic dermatitis due to treatment with EGFRIs. Of these patients, nine were treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and 16 were treated with anti-EGFR antibody alone or in combination with other anticancer agents. Serum zinc levels of all patients were lower than the normal range of >80 μg/dL, with a mean ± SD serum zinc level of 56.4 ± 11.7 μg/dL. These were correlated with serum magnesium levels in patients. As the serum magnesium level is known to be reduced by the inhibition of EGFR, a similar mechanism may also be involved in decreasing the serum zinc level. Among 21 patients treated with zinc supplementation for more than 2 months, xerotic dermatitis markedly improved, with an increase of serum zinc levels in 16 patients. The other five patients exhibited no significant improvement in their skin condition, and insufficient and unstable increase in serum zinc levels. In conclusion, zinc supplementation may be beneficial in supportive care for patients with EGFRI-induced xerotic dermatitis., (© 2021 Japanese Dermatological Association.)

Objective: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line S-1 plus cisplatin in combination with cetuximab for Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer, including gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma., Methods: This open-label, single arm, multicenter, phase 2 trial was conducted to assess first-line cetuximab plus S-1 plus cisplatin for advanced gastric cancer. A total of 40 patients from 10 centers were enrolled. Cetuximab was administered weekly, with the initial infusion at 400 mg/m2 and then 250 mg/m2 each subsequent week. S-1 plus cisplatin chemotherapy was concomitantly conducted in a 5-week cycle: S-1 (40-60 mg, adjusted for body surface area) was given twice daily for 3 consecutive weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period, and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) was given on day 8 of each cycle for a maximum of 8 cycles. Treatment continued until the occurrence of radiographically confirmed progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was the best overall response. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and safety., Results: A total of 40 patients were evaluable. One patient (2.5%) had a complete response; 15 patients (37.5%) had a partial response. The observed overall response rate according to the independent review committee was 40.0% (95% confidence interval, 24.9-56.7; P = 0.7043 [one-sided null hypothesis: overall response rate ≤ 43%]); median PFS was 5.6 months (95% confidence intervals, 4.2-8.3). No adverse events leading to death were reported during the study, and no specific safety concerns were observed., Conclusions: Overall, the addition of cetuximab to S-1 plus cisplatin was well tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancer but provided no additional clinical benefit in this study. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01388790., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: OncoBEAM™ is a circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) test that uses the BEAMing digital PCR technology. We clarified the association between the baseline tumor burden and discordance in the RAS status by metastatic sites in patients with a single metastatic site., Experimental Design: Data from previous Spanish and Japanese studies investigating the concordance of the RAS status between OncoBEAM™ and tissue biopsy in 221 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were used. We collected data from patients with liver, peritoneal, or lung metastases and evaluated the concordance rates according to the metastatic site and the association between the concordance rate and tumor burden., Results: Patients had metastases in the liver ( n = 151), peritoneum ( n = 25), or lung ( n = 45) with concordance rates of 91% (95% confidence interval, 85%-95%), 88% (68%-97%), and 64% (49%-78%), respectively. Factors associated with concordance included the baseline longest diameter and lesion number ( P = 0.004), and sample collection interval ( P = 0.036). Concordance rates ≥90% were observed in the following groups: liver metastases alone, regardless of the baseline longest diameter and lesion number; peritoneal metastases alone in patients with a baseline longest diameter ≥20 mm; and lung metastases alone in patients with a baseline longest diameter ≥20 mm and/or number of lesions ≥10., Conclusions: Plasma ctDNA-based liquid biopsy in patients with mCRC may be useful depending on the metastatic site. The maximum diameter and lesion number should be carefully considered when determining patients' RAS status with only peritoneal or lung metastases., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Nivolumab is an increasingly used standard care treatment for heavily pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer, with increasing clinical use in Japan. Data from retrospective studies on various tumors have shown the objective response rate to cytotoxic chemotherapy potentially improves after an exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Based on these data, we conducted the multicenter observational REVIVE study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cytotoxic chemotherapy in nivolumab-refractory or nivolumab-intolerant patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients who are refractory or intolerant to nivolumab and scheduled to receive irinotecan monotherapy, oxaliplatin combination treatment or oral trifluridine/tipiracil hydrochloride therapy will be included. The primary end point is overall survival of nivolumab-pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer after the cytotoxic chemotherapy. Clinical trial registration: UMIN000032182 (umin.ac.jp).

Purpose: We conducted a phase I/II study to investigate the safety and efficacy of nivolumab with paclitaxel plus ramucirumab., Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) refractory to first-line chemotherapy were included. Patients received nivolumab (3 mg/kg on days 1 and 15) combined with paclitaxel (80 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, and 15) and ramucirumab (8 mg/kg on days 1 and 15) every 4 weeks. After feasibility evaluation in six patients (phase I), 37 additional patients were enrolled in the phase II part with the primary endpoint of 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate with two-sided 80% confidence interval (CI). The combined positive score (CPS) was defined as the number of programmed death-ligand 1-positive cells divided by the total number of viable tumor cells multiplied by 100., Results: Forty-three patients were enrolled. Of these, 60.5% had CPS ≥ 1. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in two patients, and the recommended dose was determined as level 1. Thirty-nine (90.7%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (AEs) grade ≥3 and 14 (32.6%) patients experienced immune-related AEs grade ≥3. The overall response rate was 37.2% (95% CI, 23.0%-53.5%) and the 6-month PFS rate was 46.5% (80% CI, 36.4%-55.8%; P = 0.067). Median survival time was 13.1 months (95% CI, 8.0-16.6 months): 13.8 months (95% CI, 8.0-19.5 months) in patients with CPS ≥ 1 and 8.0 months (95% CI, 4.8-24.1 months) in patients with CPS < 1., Conclusions: Nivolumab with paclitaxel plus ramucirumab demonstrated promising antitumor activity with manageable toxicities as second-line treatment for AGC., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Comprehensive genomic profiling enables genomic biomarker detection in advanced solid tumors. Here, to evaluate the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genotyping, we compare trial enrollment using ctDNA sequencing in 1,687 patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer in SCRUM-Japan GOZILA (no. UMIN000016343), an observational ctDNA-based screening study, to enrollment using tumor tissue sequencing in the same centers and network (GI-SCREEN, 5,621 patients). ctDNA genotyping significantly shortened the screening duration (11 versus 33 days, P < 0.0001) and improved the trial enrollment rate (9.5 versus 4.1%, P < 0.0001) without compromising treatment efficacy compared to tissue genotyping. We also describe the clonal architecture of ctDNA profiles in ~2,000 patients with advanced GI cancer, which reinforces the relevance of many targetable oncogenic drivers and highlights multiple new drivers as candidates for clinical development. ctDNA genotyping has the potential to accelerate innovation in precision medicine and its delivery to individual patients.

Purpose: This is a phase I/II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of napabucasin plus pembrolizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)., Patients and Methods: Phase I was conducted to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in a dose escalation design of napabucasin (240 to 480 mg twice daily) with 200 mg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks. Phase II included cohort A ( n = 10, microsatellite instability high, MSI-H) and cohort B ( n = 40, microsatellite stable, MSS). The primary endpoint was immune-related objective response rate (irORR). PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS), genomic profiles, and the consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) of colorectal cancer were assessed., Results: A total of 55 patients were enrolled in this study. In phase I, no patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities, and napabucasin 480 mg was determined as RP2D. The irORR was 50.0% in cohort A and 10.0% in cohort B. In cohort B, the irORR was 0%, 5.3%, and 42.9% in CPS < 1, 1≤ CPS <10, and CPS ≥ 10, respectively. Patients with objective response tended to have higher tumor mutation burden than those without. Of evaluable 18 patients for CMS classification in cohort B, the irORR was 33.3%, 0%, 33.3%, and 33.3% in CMS1, CMS2, CMS3, and CMS4, respectively. The common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events included fever (10.0%) in cohort A and decreased appetite (7.5%) and diarrhea (5.0%) in cohort B., Conclusions: Napabucasin with pembrolizumab showed antitumor activity with acceptable toxicities for patients with MSS mCRC as well as MSI-H mCRC, although it did not meet the primary end point. The impact of related biomarkers on the efficacy warrants further investigations in the additional cohort. See related commentary by Nusrat, p. 5775 ., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Definitive chemoradiotherapy(CRT)for esophageal cancer is the standard treatment and alternative to surgery. However, the tolerability of CRT in elderly patients is not well known. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 60 patients with esophageal cancer who were treated with CRT(5-FU 700 mg/m2, cisplatin 70 mg/m2, radiation 60 Gy)at our hospital between January 2015 and September 2017. The patients were divided into 2 groups: an elderly group comprising 16 patients aged >75 years and a non-elderly group comprising 44 patients aged <74 years. The relative dose intensity of cisplatin in the elderly group was significantly lower than that in the non-elderly group. Radiotherapy was successfully executed in both groups. More patients in the elderly(25%)than the non-elderly group(7%)developed pneumonitis, and all patients who developed severe pneumonitis in the elderly group died. Application of definitive CRT and irradiation methods in elderly patients with a subpleural reticular shadow should be carefully considered before initiating therapy.

Background: Predictive markers for the clinical outcomes of second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remain unclear., Objective: This retrospective biomarker study was conducted to explore predictive markers for patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type mCRC who were treated with FOLFIRI plus panitumumab (Pani) or bevacizumab (Bev) in the WJOG6210G trial., Patients and Methods: The associations of early tumor shrinkage (ETS), tumor location, and VEGF-D with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to analyze the association of depth of response (DpR) with PFS and OS. Serum VEGF-D levels were measured in samples collected before treatment using magnetic bead panel Milliplex xMAP kits., Results: In total, 101 patients (Pani, n = 49; Bev, n = 52) were enrolled in this study. Patients with ETS had longer PFS (Pani: hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, P = 0.009; Bev: HR 0.078, P = 0.0002) and OS (Pani: HR 0.49, P = 0.044; Bev: HR 0.35, P = 0.048) than patients without ETS. The DpR was moderately correlated with PFS and OS in Pani (rs = 0.75, P < 0.001; rs = 0.60, P < 0.001) and Bev groups (rs = 0.68, P < 0.001; rs = 0.44, P = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in PFS and OS between the two treatment groups even if in left-sided tumors. No significant interaction between VEGF-D levels and treatment was observed in PFS and OS., Conclusions: ETS and DpR serve as surrogate markers of PFS and OS in the second-line treatment with FOLFIRI plus targeted agent for mCRC.

Background: While the BRAF V600E mutation occurs in 5%-15% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), BRAF non-V600E mutations were recently reported to range from 1.6% to 5.1%. We have previously reported that BRAF non-V600E mutations could have a negative impact on efficacy outcomes as well as BRAF V600E mutation for antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody treatment for pretreated patients with mCRC. Recently, simultaneous inhibitions of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK), BRAF and EGFR exhibited relevant antitumour activities in patients with BRAF V600E mutant and also in BRAF non-V600E mutant but only in the preclinical model., Trial Design: The BIG BANG (study is a multicentre, phase II study to assess the efficacy, safety and proof of concept of the combinations of binimetinib+encorafenib+cetuximab in patients with BRAF non-V600E mutated mCRC, identified by either tumour tissue (tumour tissue group) or blood samples (liquid biopsy group). Key eligibility criteria include Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of ≤1, mCRC with BRAF non-V600E mutant and RAS wild type, refractory or intolerant to at least one fluoropyrimidine-based regimen and no prior history of regorafenib, and no prior history of anti-EGFR antibody treatment (primary analysis cohort and liquid biopsy cohort) or refractory to prior anti-EGFR antibody treatment in patients with class 3 BRAF mutations (anti-EGFR antibody refractory class three cohort). Enrolled patients receive binimetinib (45 mg, two times per day), encorafenib (300 mg, once a day) and cetuximab (initially 400 mg/m 2 and subsequently 250 mg/m 2 , once per week). The primary endpoint is the confirmed objective response rate in the primary analysis cohort., Trial Registration Numbers: UMIN000031857 and 000031860., (© 2020 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier Limited on behalf of European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Background: BRAF V600E mutations are associated with aggressive biology and limited response to standard chemotherapy, especially during second-line and beyond therapies. BRAF V600E mutant and wild-type colorectal cancers (CRCs) differ in their expression profiles, and preclinical evidence suggests that microtubule inhibitors have an antitumour effect on xenograft models of BRAF V600E mutant CRCs. Eribulin has the best growth inhibitory activity in vitro of the microtubule inhibitors. Also, we have evidenced a hint of activity for patients with BRAF V600E mutant metastatic CRC (mCRC) with tumour shrinkage following eribulin treatment., Trial Design: The BRAVERY study is a multicentre phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eribulin in patients with BRAF V600E mutant mCRC detected in either tumour tissues (primary analysis part) or circulating tumour DNA assays (liquid biopsy part). Key eligibility criteria are refractoriness and intolerance to at least one regimen (including irinotecan or oxaliplatin) containing fluoropyrimidine and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Eribulin is to be administered intravenously at a dose of 1.4 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8 and repeated every 21 days. The primary endpoint is the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by investigator's assessment. We calculated the sample size of the primary analysis part at 27 patients using a two-stage design with 25% ORR deemed promising and 5% unacceptable (one-sided α, 0.05; β, 0.1). Secondary endpoints include disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival and adverse events. Moreover, we will collect pretreated tissue and serial blood samples for biomarker analyses, focusing on gene expression associated with BRAF mutant-like CRC to find predictive markers and acquired gene alterations to detect resistance mechanisms to eribulin. We initiated patient enrolment in March 2018, completed the primary analysis on May 2019, and are currently continuing with the liquid biopsy part., Trial Registration Number: UMIN000031221 and 000031552., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TM has received honoraria from Takeda, Chugai, Merck Serono, Taiho, Bayer, Lilly Japan, Yakult Honsha, and Sanofi and has received research funding from Yakult Honsha, MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, and Ono; HT has received honoraria from Takeda, Chugai, Merck Serono, Taiho, Bayer, Lilly Japan, and Yakult Honsha, Sanofi; DK has received honoraria from Takeda, Chugai, Lilly and Merck Serono; HB has received honoraria from Taiho and Eli Lilly Japan and has received research funding from Taiho, Astrazeneca and Sysmex; YK has received honoraria Takeda, Chugai, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ono, Merck Biopharma, Taiho, Bayer, Lilly, Yakult Honsha, Sanofi, Nipro, Moroo, Asahi Kasei, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Otsuka, Medical Review, and Shiseido and has received research funding from MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, NanoCarrier, Eisai, Sysmex, Shionogi, IQVIA, Parexel International, Astellas, Mediscience, Sumitomo Dainippon, A2 Healthcare, Ono, Taiho, Bayer, Yakult Honsha, and Sanofi, ES has received honoraria from Taiho, Yakult, Chugai, Lilly, Sanofi, Merck bioparm, and Takeda; TEN has received honoraria from Takeda, Chugai, Merck Serono, Taiho, Bayer, Lilly Japan, Sanofi, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Sawai, Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan, Ono, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, MSD, Nippon Kayaku, Celltrion Healthcare Japan, and Teijin and has received research funding from Takeda, Chugai, Merck Serono, Taiho, Lilly Japan, Sanofi, Ono, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, MSD, Nippon Kayaku, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo, A2 Healthcare and Solasia Pharma; TS has received honoraria from Chugai, Merck Serono, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Yakult Honsha, Lilly, Bayer Yakuhin, Ono, Merck, Astellas Pharma, Taiho and Nihonkayaku, has received consulting or advisory role from Bayer, Lilly, Ono, Takara Bio, Merck Serono, and Nihonkayaku, and has received research funding from Yakult Honsha, Chugai, Ono, Sanofi, Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Serono, Gilead Sciences, and Dainippon Sumitomo; TE has received honoraria from Lilly, Taiho, Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Serono, Chugai, Ono, Takeda, Bayer, and Sanofi and has received research funding from Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Dainippon Sumitomo, Ono, Astellas Pharma, Lilly, Bayer, Nihonkayaku, Pfizer, and Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan; MW has received honoraria from Chugai and Johnson and Johnson; SN has received honoraria from Taiho and Astrazeneca, AS has received research funding from MSD, Eisai, Ono, Taiho, Takeda, and Bayer, Atsushi Ohtsu has received honoraria from Ono, BMS, Chugai, Taiho, Eisai, and Amgen and has received research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb and immediate family member of Atsushi Ohtsu have been employed by Celgene, and Takayuki Yoshino has received research funding from Novartis, MSD, Sumitomo Dainippon, Chugai, Sanofi, Daiichi Sankyo, Parexel, Ono, GlaxoSmithKline and Boehringer Ingelheim., (© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Background: We investigated early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) using data from the G-SOX study comparing S-1 plus oxaliplatin with S-1 plus cisplatin as the first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC)., Methods: ETS was determined as % decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions at the first evaluation of week 6 compared to baseline. DpR was the maximum % shrinkage during the study treatment. The impact of ETS (cutoff value 20%) and DpR (continuous value) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis including prognostic factors obtained in the G-SOX study; ECOG performance status, baseline sum of tumor diameters, disease status (recurrent/unresectable), and histology (diffuse/intestinal)., Results: Among 685 patients enrolled in the G-SOX study, 632 patients who had the first tumor evaluation were analyzed. Patients with ETS ≥ 20% had longer PFS (median 4.5 vs. 2.8 months, p < 0.0001) and OS (median 14.8 vs. 10.5 months, p < 0.0001) than those with ETS < 20%. Adjusted hazard ratios of ETS < 20 vs. ≥ 20% were 0.606 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.506-0.725) for PFS and 0.589 (95% CI 0.492-0.704) for OS. DpR was also significantly associated with PFS and OS (both p < 0.0001). These results were similar between the SOX and CS groups., Conclusions: In AGC patients receiving the first-line therapy, ETS and DpR might be predictors for PFS and OS.

Introduction This phase 1, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, dose-escalation study aimed to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics of erdafitinib (JNJ-42756493), an oral selective pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and to determine the recommended phase 2 dose in Japanese patients with advanced or refractory solid tumors. Methods Three to 6 patients were enrolled into sequentially escalating dose cohorts (erdafitinib 2, 4, or 6 mg) with a daily dosing schedule of 21-day cycles or a 7 days-on/7 days-off intermittent schedule (erdafitinib 10 mg or 12 mg) of 28-day cycles. Results Nineteen patients received escalating doses of erdafitinib with a daily or intermittent schedule. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were hyperphosphatemia (73.7%), nausea (36.8%), stomatitis (26.3%), dysgeusia (26.3%) and dry mouth (21.1%). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached in this study. No Grade 3 or higher TEAEs, or serious TEAEs were noted and no clinically significant changes in vital signs, laboratory parameters, and electrocardiogram readings were observed. However, one case of dose-limiting toxicity in the 12 mg intermittent dosing group was observed: Grade 2 detachment of retinal pigment epithelium (bilateral) with treatment discontinuation. The maximum plasma concentrations of erdafitinib exhibited a dose-dependent increase. The median t max ranged from 2 to 3 h after the initial dose to 2-6 h following multiple daily dosing. Based on the safety and PK data, the 10 mg 7 days-on/7 days-off regimen was determined as the recommended phase 2 dose in this study. Conclusions Erdafitinib was well tolerated in Japanese patients with advanced or refractory solid tumors., Trial Registration: NCT01962532.

Objective: To evaluate the safety (including adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs]), tolerability, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of the investigational MET inhibitor rilotumumab alone in patients with advanced solid tumors (Part 1) or in combination with cisplatin plus capecitabine (CX) in patients with MET-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (Part 2)., Methods: Adult patients received 10 or 20 mg/kg intravenous (IV) rilotumumab every 2 weeks (Part 1) or 15 mg/kg IV rilotumumab every 3 weeks plus 80 mg/m2 cisplatin on Day 1 and 1000 mg/m2 capecitabine twice daily on Days 1-14 of every 21-day cycle (Part 2)., Results: Nine patients enrolled in Part 1; 12 patients enrolled in Part 2. One DLT occurred (Grade 3 decreased appetite and stomatitis [Part 2]). Adverse events related to any treatment occurred in 17 patients (81%) and were Grade ≥3 in nine patients (43%). Rilotumumab pharmacokinetics appeared linear, and exposure was unaffected by CX. No patient who received rilotumumab monotherapy in Part 1 had a response. In Part 2, five of eight patients (63%) with measureable disease at baseline had a partial response and two patients (25%) had stable disease; median (95% CI) progression-free survival was 7.0 (2.4-15.4) months; overall survival was 18.2 (5.6-20.4) months., Conclusions: In combination with CX, rilotumumab appeared tolerable and showed antitumor activity in Japanese patients with MET-positive gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer. However, owing to the results of recent Phase 3 trials of MET inhibitors (including rilotumumab), further development of rilotumumab in this setting is not being pursued. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01791374., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: We aimed to better clarify the role of germline variants of the FCG2 receptor, FCGR2A-H131R and FCGR3A-V158F, on the therapeutic efficacy of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A large cohort with sufficient statistical power was assembled., Design: To show a HR advantage of 0.6 in progression-free survival (PFS) for FCGR2A-HH versus the rest and FCGR3A-VV versus the rest, with an 80% power, 80 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) wild-type (KRAS-WT) and 52 KRAS-WT patients are required, respectively. This leads to a total sample size of 952 and 619 patients, respectively. Samples were collected from 1123 mCRC patients from 15 European centres treated with cetuximab alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Fc gamma receptor (FCGR) status was centrally genotyped. Two additional externally genotyped series were included., Results: Incidences of FCGR2A-HH and FCGR3A-VV in KRAS-WT patients were 220/660 (33%) and 109/676 (16.1%) respectively. There was no difference in median PFS (mPFS) for KRAS-WT patients with FCGR2A-HH (22.0 weeks; 95% CI18.8 to 25.2) versus non-HH (22.0 weeks; 95% CI 19.4 to 24.6) or for FCGR3A-VV (16.4 weeks; 95% CI 13.0 to 19.8) versus non-VV (23 weeks; 95% CI 21.1 to 24.9) (p=0.06). Median overall survival, response rate and disease control rate assessments showed no benefit for either HH or VV., Conclusions: No differences in mPFS were found between the FCGR polymorphisms HH and the others and VV versus the others in KRAS-WT mCRC patients refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil treated with cetuximab. We cannot confirm the effects of other IgG1 antibodies, which may be weaker than previously suggested. Other markers may be needed to study the actual host antibody response to cetuximab., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Purpose: The FIRIS study previously demonstrated non-inferiority of IRIS (irinotecan plus S-1) to FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with irinotecan) for progression-free survival as the second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as the primary endpoint. The overall survival (OS) data were immature at the time of the primary analysis., Methods: Between 30 January 2006 and 29 January 2008, 426 patients with mCRC who failed in first-line chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive either FOLFIRI or IRIS. After the primary analysis, the follow-up survey was cut off on 29 July 2010, and the final OS data were analysed., Results: With a median follow-up of 39.2 months, the median OS was 17.4 months in the FOLFIRI group and 17.8 months in the IRIS group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.900; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.728-1.112]. In the pre-planned subgroup of patients who received prior chemotherapy containing oxaliplatin, the median OS was 12.7 months in the FOLFIRI group and 15.3 months in the IRIS group (HR 0.755; 95% CI 0.580-0.983)., Conclusions: IRIS is non-inferior to FOLFIRI for OS as second-line chemotherapy for mCRC. IRIS can be an option for second-line chemotherapy of mCRC. (ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT00284258).

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 18 F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET/CT) has become established in cancer imaging, and derived maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) add functional information regarding cancer, including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical significance and association of tumor progression using SUVmax derived from PET/CT images in patients with ESCC. In total, 101 patients with ESCC were assessed using FDG-PET/CT and the SUVmax was then compared with the clinical backgrounds and prognoses of the patients. Endoscopic ESCC biopsy specimens were obtained in order to analyze mRNA expression relative to tumor progression. The results showed that values for SUVmax were significantly higher in patients with tumor progression factors, particularly those with lymph node metastasis. Analysis of receiver operating characteristics curves revealed an optimum SUVmax cut-off value of 10.26 for node-positive disease. Patients with SUVmax ≥10.26 had gene alterations with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and significantly worse overall survival (P=0.0012). A higher SUVmax in patients with ESCC was associated with lymph node metastasis and a poorer prognosis. Thus, the SUVmax may reflect the potential of EMT in patients with ESCC.

Background: Retrospective analyses in the West suggest that mutations in KRAS codons 61 and 146, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA are negative predictive factors for cetuximab treatment in colorectal cancer patients. We developed a novel multiplex kit detecting 36 mutations in KRAS codons 61 and 146, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA using Luminex (xMAP) assay in a single reaction., Methods: Tumor samples and clinical data from Asian colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab were collected. We investigated KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations using both the multiplex kit and direct sequencing methods, and evaluated the concordance between the 2 methods. Objective response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were also evaluated according to mutational status., Results: In total, 82 of 83 samples (78 surgically resected specimens and 5 biopsy specimens) were analyzed using both methods. All multiplex assays were performed using 50 ng of template DNA. The concordance rate between the methods was 100%. Overall, 49 (59.8%) patients had all wild-type tumors, 21 (25.6%) had tumors harboring KRAS codon 12 or 13 mutations, and 12 (14.6%) had tumors harboring KRAS codon 61, KRAS codon 146, BRAF, NRAS, or PIK3CA mutations. The response rates in these patient groups were 38.8%, 4.8%, and 0%, respectively. Median PFS in these groups was 6.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.1-9.2), 2.7 months (1.2-4.2), and 1.6 months (1.5-1.7); median OS was 13.8 months (9.2-18.4), 8.2 months (5.7-10.7), and 6.3 months (1.3-11.3), respectively. Statistically significant differences in both PFS and OS were found between patients with all wild-type tumors and those with KRAS codon 61, KRAS codon 146, BRAF, NRAS, or PIK3CA mutations (PFS: 95% CI, 0.11-0.44; P < 0.0001; OS: 95% CI, 0.15-0.61; P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Our newly developed multiplex kit is practical and feasible for investigation of a range of sample types. Moreover, mutations in KRAS codon 61, KRAS codon 146, BRAF, NRAS, or PIK3CA detected in Asian patients were not predictive of clinical benefits from cetuximab treatment, similar to the result obtained in European studies.

Pancreatic cancer shows the worst prognosis among the solid tumors, and survival for patients with high-grade liver metastasis is estimated at around a few months. We reported the effects of combination therapy with gemcitabine and S-1 (GS therapy) on pancreatic cancer patients with high-grade hepatic metastasis. Patients with severe metastatic pancreatic cancer received chemotherapy comprising S-1 (30mg/m² p.o. b.i.d., days 1-14) and gemcitabine (1000mg/m² on days 1 and 8), repeated every 3 weeks. Fourteen patients (7 men, 7 women) received treatment at a mean age of 56.5 years (range, 39-76 years), achieving complete response in 1 patient, partial response in 5 patients, and stable disease in 3 patients and progressive disease in 5 patients. The response rate was thus 43%. Median progression-free survival was 186 days (95% confidence interval, 40-247 days). Median overall survival was 261 days (95% confidence interval, 162-358 days). GS therapy appears to be well-tolerated and effective in patients with high-grade hepatic metastasis.

Irinotecan-induced severe neutropenia is associated with homozygosity for the UGT1A1*28 or UGT1A1*6 alleles. In this study, we determined the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan in patients with UGT1A1 polymorphisms. Patients who had received chemotherapy other than irinotecan for metastatic gastrointestinal cancer were enrolled. Patients were divided into three groups according to UGT1A1 genotypes: wild-type (*1/*1); heterozygous (*28/*1, *6/*1); or homozygous (*28/*28, *6/*6, *28/*6). Irinotecan was given every 2 weeks for two cycles. The wild-type group received a fixed dose of irinotecan (150 mg/m(2)) to serve as a reference. The MTD was guided from 75 to 150 mg/m(2) by the continual reassessment method in the heterozygous and homozygous groups. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and pharmacokinetics were evaluated during cycle 1. Of 82 patients enrolled, DLT was assessable in 79 patients (wild-type, 40; heterozygous, 20; and homozygous, 19). Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in one patient in the wild-type group, none in the heterozygous group, and six patients (grade 4 neutropenia) in the homozygous group. In the homozygous group, the MTD was 150 mg/m(2) and the probability of DLT was 37.4%. The second cycle was delayed because of neutropenia in 56.3% of the patients given the MTD. The AUC(0-24 h) of SN-38 was significantly greater (P < 0.001) and more widely distributed in the homozygous group. Patients homozygous for the UGT1A1*28 or UGT1A1*6 allele can receive irinotecan in a starting dose of 150 mg/m(2), but many required dose reductions or delayed treatment in subsequent cycles. UMIN Clinical Trial Registration number: UMIN000000618., (© 2011 Japanese Cancer Association.)

Background & Aims: Two major types of gastric cancer, intestinal and diffuse, develop through distinct mechanisms; the diffuse type is considered to be more influenced by genetic factors, although the mechanism is unknown. Our previous genome-wide association study associated 3 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with diffuse-type gastric cancer (DGC); 1 was a functional SNP (rs2294008) in prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA), but the loci of the other 2 were not investigated., Methods: We performed high-density mapping to explore a linkage disequilibrium status of the 2 SNPs at chromosome 1q22. A DGC case-control study was conducted using DNA from 606 cases and 1264 controls (all Japanese individuals) and validated using DNA from Japanese (304 cases, 1465 controls) and Korean (452 cases, 372 controls) individuals. The effects of SNPs on function were analyzed by reporter assays and analyses of splice variants., Results: A region of a strong linkage disequilibrium with the 2 SNPs contained mucin 1 (MUC1) and other 4 genes and SNPs significantly associated with DGC (rs2070803: P = 4.33 × 10(-13); odds ratio [OR], 1.71 by meta-analysis of the studies on the 3 panels) but not with intestinal-type gastric cancer. Functional studies demonstrated that rs4072037 (P = 1.43 × 10(-11); OR, 1.66 by meta-analysis) in MUC1 affects promoter activity and determines the major splicing variants of MUC1 in the gastric epithelium. Individuals that carry both SNPs rs2294008 in PSCA and rs4072037 in MUC1 have a high risk for developing DGC (OR, 8.38)., Conclusions: MUC1 is the second major DGC susceptibility gene identified. The SNPs rs2070803 and rs4072037 in MUC1 might be used to identify individuals at risk for this type of gastric cancer., (Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Early gastric cancer (EGC) has a favorable prognosis after surgical gastrectomy. For intramucosal EGC with little risk of lymph node metastasis, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an accepted treatment method. Herein we document a noteworthy case of small undifferentiated gastric cancer with nodal metastasis. A 60-year-old Japanese woman underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for the treatment of EGC in the lower gastric body. Histological examination revealed that signet-ring cell carcinoma was located in approximately one-third of the superficial portion of the mucosal layer, with a tumor size of 13 mm. No lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, or fibrosis was observed in the submucosal layer. This case had nodal metastasis and was finally diagnosed as stage IB (T1N1M0) according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (JCGC). The patient is alive without recurrence 6 years after treatment.

Background: Fluorouracil and folinic acid with either oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or irinotecan (FOLFIRI) are widely used as first-line or second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. However, infusional fluorouracil-based regimens, requiring continuous infusion and implantation of an intravenous port system, are inconvenient. We therefore planned an open-label randomised controlled trial to verify the non-inferiority of irinotecan plus oral S-1 (a combination of tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine, and potassium oxonate; IRIS) to FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer., Methods: Between Jan 30, 2006, and Jan 29, 2008, 426 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer needing second-line chemotherapy from 40 institutions in Japan were randomly assigned by a computer-based minimisation method to receive either FOLFIRI (n=213) or IRIS (n=213). In the FOLFIRI group, patients received folinic acid (200 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (150 mg/m(2)) and then a bolus injection of fluorouracil (400 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and a continuous infusion of fluorouracil (2400 mg/m(2)) over 46 h, repeated every 2 weeks. In the IRIS group, patients received irinotecan (125 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 15 and S-1 (40-60 mg according to body surface area) twice daily for 2 weeks, repeated every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, with a non-inferiority margin of 1.333. Statistical analysis was on the basis of initially randomised participants. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00284258., Findings: All randomised patients were included in the primary analysis. After a median follow-up of 12.9 months (IQR 11.5-18.2), median progression-free survival was 5.1 months in the FOLFIRI group and 5.8 months in the IRIS group (hazard ratio 1.077, 95% CI 0.879-1.319, non-inferiority test p=0.039). The most common grade three or four adverse drug reactions were neutropenia (110 [52.1%] of 211 patients in the FOLFIRI group and 76 [36.2%] of 210 patients in the IRIS group; p=0.0012), leucopenia (33 [15.6%] in the FOLFIRI group and 38 [18.1%] in the IRIS group; p=0.5178), and diarrhoea (ten [4.7%] in the FOLFIRI group and 43 [20.5%] in the IRIS group; p<0.0001). One treatment-related death from hypotension due to shock was reported in the FOLFIRI group within 28 days after the end of treatment; no treatment-related deaths were reported in the IRIS group., Interpretation: Progression-free survival with IRIS is not inferior to that with FOLFIRI in patients receiving second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Treatment with IRIS could be an additional therapeutic option for second-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer., Funding: Taiho Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Daiichi Sankyo Co Ltd., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

PURPOSE Everolimus, an oral inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, has shown antitumor activity in gastric cancer in preclinical and phase I studies. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of everolimus in pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced gastric cancer who experienced progression despite prior chemotherapy received everolimus 10 mg orally daily until disease progression or study discontinuation. The primary end point was disease control rate (DCR; ie, complete response, partial response, or stable disease). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Fifty-three patients were assessable (median age, 63 years; 51% and 49% received one or two prior chemotherapy regimens, respectively). Although no complete or partial response was obtained, a decrease in tumor size from baseline was observed in 45% of patients by central review. The DCR was 56.0% (95% CI, 41.3% to 70.0%); median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI, 1.6 to 3.0 months). At a median follow-up time of 9.6 months, median OS was 10.1 months (95% CI, 6.5 to 12.1 months). Common grade 3 or 4 adverse events included anemia, hyponatremia, increased gamma-glutamyltransferase, and lymphopenia. Grade 1 or 2 pneumonitis was reported in eight patients (15.1%). CONCLUSION Everolimus monotherapy resulted in a promising DCR in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer. Adverse events are consistent with the reported safety profile of everolimus. These results warrant further evaluation in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Objective: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a possible alternative to surgery for esophageal cancer. As complete response (CR) to CRT is essential for a good prognosis, potential biomarkers predictive of CR were explored., Methods: Endoscopic tumor biopsies were obtained from 41 patients with stage II-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma before 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin-based definitive CRT. cDNA was derived from RNA isolated from microdissected tumor cells. mRNA expression levels of 10 genes involved in CRT or tumor biology were measured using quantitative real-time RT-PCR., Results: Expression levels of orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT) and dihydrofolate reductase mRNA were significantly higher in the CR group compared with the non-CR group (p = 0.0206 and 0.0191, respectively). Matrix metalloproteinase 9 mRNA expression was significantly lower in the CR group (p = 0.0436). CR rates were significantly higher in patients with node-negative disease and high expression levels of OPRT and dihydrofolate reductase genes (p = 0.0448, 0.0104 and 0.0104, respectively). No significant difference in CR rates was observed for other variables. Multivariate analysis revealed that high OPRT gene expression was an independent predictive factor of CR (p = 0.0192). It was also significantly associated with good prognosis (p = 0.0450)., Conclusion: High OPRT gene expression may be a predictive factor of CR to 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin-based CRT in esophageal cancer., (Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: Cetuximab is a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody that specifically blocks the epidermal growth factor receptor. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of cetuximab in combination with irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidines., Methods: Cetuximab was administered initially at a dose of 400 mg/m(2) followed by weekly infusions at 250 mg/m(2). Irinotecan was administered either weekly at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) or every 2 weeks at 150 mg/m(2)., Results: Between October 2005 and February 2006, 39 consecutive patients were enrolled. The response and disease control rates (complete or partial response, or stable disease) were 30.8% (95% CI, 17.0-47.6) and 64.1% (95% CI, 47.2-78.8), respectively. With a median follow-up of 14.4 months, median time to progression was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.7-5.1) and median survival time was 8.8 months (95% CI, 5.9-12.8). Patients (5.1%) developed Grade 3 acne-like rash., Conclusions: Combination therapy of cetuximab and irinotecan is effective and well-tolerated in patients with metastatic CRC refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidines.

Gastric cancer is classified into intestinal and diffuse types, the latter including a highly malignant form, linitis plastica. A two-stage genome-wide association study (stage 1: 85,576 SNPs on 188 cases and 752 references; stage 2: 2,753 SNPs on 749 cases and 750 controls) in Japan identified a significant association between an intronic SNP (rs2976392) in PSCA (prostate stem cell antigen) and diffuse-type gastric cancer (allele-specific odds ratio (OR) = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.38-1.89, P = 1.11 x 10(-9)). The association was far less significant in intestinal-type gastric cancer. We found that PSCA is expressed in differentiating gastric epithelial cells, has a cell-proliferation inhibition activity in vitro and is frequently silenced in gastric cancer. Substitution of the C allele with the risk allele T at a SNP in the first exon (rs2294008, which has r(2) = 0.995, D' = 0.999 with rs2976392) reduces transcriptional activity of an upstream fragment of the gene. The same risk allele was also significantly associated with diffuse-type gastric cancer in 457 cases and 390 controls in Korea (allele-specific OR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.56-2.33, P = 8.01 x 10(-11)). The polymorphism of the PSCA gene, which is possibly involved in regulating gastric epithelial-cell proliferation, influences susceptibility to diffuse-type gastric cancer.

This trial was performed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the FOLFOX4 regimen in Japanese patients with ACRC until the end of the third cycle according to the regulation of the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare. Thirty-nine patients received FOLFOX4 and 38 patients were evaluable for safety analysis. Thirty-four patients completed all three cycles, 18 of whom did not need dose reduction or prolongation of administration. The most frequent of grade 3/ 4 adverse events (the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0) were neutropenia (42.1%), nausea (5.3%), and anorexia (5.3%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Neuro-sensory toxicity was a highly-frequent adverse event (78.9%), but no grade 3/4 neurotoxicity was seen. The FOLFOX4 regimen was acceptable to Japanese patients with ACRC in at least 3 cycles.

The clinical efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus infusional fluorouracil/l-leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in patients with fluoropyrimidine-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer were studied retrospectively. 20 patients were treated with FOLFIRI at our hospital between October 2003 and November 2005. The objective overall response rate was 28% (5/18; 95% confidence interval, 9.7-54%). The disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 61%. The most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse event was neutropenia, and it was seen in 50%. Non-hematological toxicities were mild. The median survival time was 11 months. The 1-year survival rate was 34%. This study showed the activity and safety of FOLFIRI in practice.

Background: For intramucosal differentiated early gastric cancer that has little risk of lymph node metastasis, local treatment such as endoscopic mucosal resection has been generally accepted as an adequate treatment. We studied clinicopathological characteristics of undifferentiated early gastric cancer at our institution to identify the predictive factors for lymph node metastasis and qualify lesions that should be referred for gastrectomy and not endoscopic mucosal resection., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features (patient age and gender, tumor size, location, macroscopic type and histological type, presence of ulceration, depth of tumor invasion, and lymphatic-vascular involvement) in 332 patients with undifferentiated early gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection., Results: Lymph node metastasis was observed in 45 patients (14%). Univariate analysis revealed that depth of tumor invasion (submucosa), tumor size (>30 mm), and lymphatic-vascular involvement (positive) were associated with lymph node metastasis. Only lymphatic-vascular involvement (positive) was found to have a significant association (odds ratio, 7.4; 95% confidence interval, 2.9-19.0) by multivariate analysis., Conclusions: Lymphatic-vascular involvement was the only independent predictive risk factor for lymph node metastasis. This pathologic factor was not useful for identifying patients at high risk of lymph node metastasis who should be offered gastrectomy rather than endoscopic mucosal resection.

Purpose: Based on the synergistic effect in preclinical studies, a phase I clinical trial for the combination of paclitaxel and doxifluridine (an intermetabolite of capecitabine) was performed to determine the recommended dose for the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer., Methods: The dose of paclitaxel was increased from 60 mg/m2 at level 1 to 90 mg/m2 at level 5. It was administered as a 1-h infusion on days 1 and 8. The dose of doxifluridine was fixed at 600 mg/m2 per day up to level 3, and escalated to 800 mg/m2 per day at levels 4 and 5. It was administered orally for 2 weeks. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks., Results: A total of 28 patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed at levels 1 and 2 (paclitaxel 70 mg/m2). A DLT of grade 4 neutropenia lasting for more than 4 days was observed in one patient at level 3 (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2). In addition, the first five of six patients in this group experienced grade 3 neutropenia during the first treatment cycle. A further six patients were added in order to confirm the safety of this dosage level, and no more DLTs except for grade 3 nausea in one patient were observed in the second cohort. No DLT was seen in three patients at level 4 (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2). DLTs (grade 3 neuropathy in one patient and a treatment delay of the second cycle for more than 1 week due to grade 3 neutropenia in another) were observed in two out of six patients at level 5 (paclitaxel 90 mg/m2), and this dose level was determined as the maximum tolerated dose. The tumor response rate was 42% (95% confidence interval 20-67%) in 19 patients with measurable lesions., Conclusions: The recommended dose was determined as 80 mg/m2 of paclitaxel (days 1 and 8) and 800 mg/m2) of doxifluridine (days 1-14) every 3 weeks. The results of this phase I study are encouraging and a phase II trial is thus warranted.

The clinical efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy were studied retrospectively in the patients with recurrent or metastatic pancreatic cancer. The subjects were 30 patients who were treated with GEM at our center between May 2001 and August 2003. The objective overall response rate was 11% (3/28; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-28%). The disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 54%. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was most frequently seen in 46%. Non-hematological toxicities were mild. The median survival time was 4.8 months. One-year survival rate was 15%. This study showed the reproducible activity and safety of GEM in practice.

The clinical efficacy and safety of irinotecan (CPT-11) therapy were studied retrospectively in patients with fluoropyrimidine-resistant advanced colorectal cancer. The subjects were 44 patients who were treated with CPT-11 alone or with a combination of CPT-11 and mitomycin C (MMC) at our institute from April 1999 to March 2003. CPT-11 (120-150 mg/m2) alone or CPT-11 with MMC (5 mg/m2) was administered every 2 weeks. The objective overall response rate was 11% (95% confidence interval, 3.8-25%). In 38 patients who were treated until October 2002, the median survival time was 12 months. Two-year survival rate was 13%. Grade 3 anorexia or diarrhea occurred in 6 patients (14%) and 5 patients (11%), respectively. There was no treatment-related death or early death within 30 days from the last administration of CPT-11 (+MMC). This retrospective study demonstrated the reproducible activity and safety of CPT-11 for the treatment of fluoropyrimidine-resistant advanced colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

The aim of this work was to determine whether intratumour contents of thymidine phosphorylase (TP), which converts 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR) to 5-fluorouracil, and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), which degrades 5-fluorouracil to inactive molecules, could be useful in predicting the response of patients with metastatic gastric cancer to chemotherapy using 5'-DFUR. Endoscopic biopsy specimens for the measurement of TP and DPD were obtained from the primary lesions before the start of combination chemotherapy, in which 5'-DFUR, cisplatin and mitomycin C were administered. TP and DPD were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays after the objective responses to chemotherapy had been confirmed. Twenty five patients were enrolled in this study and data for 22 patients in whom responses were confirmed were analysed. The median levels (ranges) of TP and DPD were 80 (4.9-360) and 44 (15-82) U/mg protein, respectively. The median value (range) of TP to DPD ratios was 1.9 (0.25-5.1). Eight patients with a complete or partial response to chemotherapy had significantly higher TP to DPD ratios than did the remaining patients with stable or progressive disease (P = 0.014). When a cut-off level of TP to DPD ratio was defined as the median value, the high-ratio group (n = 11) showed a significantly higher response rate (64% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.024) than the low-ratio group (n = 11). Overall survival of the high-ratio group was significantly longer than that of the low-ratio group (the median survival time; 300 days vs. 183 days, P = 0.047). The efficacy of 5'-DFUR could be optimised by preselecting patients with high TP/ DPD ratios in their tumour tissues, and this would be applicable to the treatment with capecitabine.

Background: The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasing worldwide because of the growing public interest in natural or holistic therapies and because of the flow of information through the Internet. However, there is a lack of communication between cancer patients and their physicians on topics relating to CAM. The authors performed a cross-sectional survey to evaluate the perceptions and attitudes of Japanese clinical oncologists toward cancer CAM., Methods: The CAM questionnaires were sent to 2118 clinical oncologists. The questionnaires gathered data on background (age, gender, years in practice, specialty, and knowledge of cancer CAM), perception (effectiveness/ineffectiveness, scientific evidence, and drug interactions), and attitude (experience with and response to CAM users). Questions about oncologists' perceptions and attitudes to CAM were limited to herbs and other natural products that were sold over the counter., Results: One hundred sixty-six questionnaires were returned as undeliverable. Of the remaining questionnaires, 751 were returned (a response rate of 39%). Two-thirds of the responders were surgical oncologists and most of the remaining responders were medical oncologists. The majority of oncologists (82%) believed that CAM products were ineffective against cancer. The main reason for this belief was a lack of reliable information (as cited by 85% of oncologists). Only 13% of oncologists had experienced CAM-associated disease improvement in their cancer patients. Of all the oncologists, 84% considered the possibility of drug interactions between anticancer drugs and CAM products. The majority of oncologists (80%) replied that they could neither promote the use of CAM products nor recommend quitting the products, when they were asked about the use of CAM products by cancer patients., Conclusions: Negative perceptions of CAM products persist among clinical oncologists. A lack of proven effectiveness of CAM products and concerns about drug interactions with anticancer treatment suggest a need for both accurate information on CAM products and clinical trials., (Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.)

The clinical efficacy and safety of TS-1 therapy were studied retrospectively in patients with inoperable and recurrent gastric cancer. The subjects were 45 patients who were treated with TS-1 for more than 4 weeks at our center between May 1999 and July 2002. The objective overall response rate was 32% (14/44; 95% confidence interval, CI, 19-48). The response rate in the chemo-naive patients was 44% (11/25; 95% CI, 24-65), and that in the patients with previous chemotherapy was 16% (3/19; 95% CI, 3.4-40). Although doses or durations of TS-1 administration were reduced in 22 patients (reduction group) due to adverse effects or poor performance status, they achieved a fairly high response rate of 38% (8/21). For primary lesions, the response rate was 30% (8/27). The prevalence of adverse reactions with a grade of 3 or 4 was 36%. However, the prevalence of each grade 3 or 4 adverse effect was relatively low, at 13% for neutropenia, and around 5% for anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. The median administration period was 10 weeks (4-47 weeks) in all patients and 11 weeks (6-47 weeks) in the reduction group. The relative dose intensity was 0.89 in all patients and 0.81 in the reduction group. In patients who were treated until August 2001, the median survival time (MST) was 13 months with 1-year and 2-year survival rates of 53% and 14%, respectively. These results were similar to those reported in the phase II study for the new drug approval. This study demonstrated the reproducible activity and safety of TS-1 in practice.

The endoscopic examination of a 66-year-old male patient revealed a protruding lesion close to a reddish IIc area in the antrum of the stomach. The protruding lesion and reddish area were resected completely with endoscopic mucosal resection using an insulation-tip diathermic knife (IT-EMR). Histological examination of the protruding lesion revealed proliferation of fibroblasts and infiltration of inflammatory cells, and it was diagnosed as an inflammatory fibroid polyp (IFP). Adenocarcinoma in the IIc area was present adjacent to the IFP. This may be the first report of gastric cancer concomitant with gastric IFP treated by endoscopic mucosal resection.

A case of granular cell tumor occurring in the sigmoid colon is reported. The patient, a 56-year-old man, visited our hospital for further evaluation of occult blood in his stool. Endoscopic examination revealed a yellowish, hemispheric submucosal tumor (SMT) with redness, about 6 mm in diameter, in the sigmoid colon. Endoscopic mucosal resection using a transparent cap (EMR-C) was performed, and histological examination revealed that the tumor consisted of a nested growth of large tumor cells with ample granular cytoplasm and small round nuclei. The tumor cells expressed S-100 protein and were stained with neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and periodic acid-Schiff, but were negative for desmin, vimentin, and cytokeratin. The resected tumor was diagnosed as a granular cell tumor. This may be the first report of a colorectal granular cell tumor successfully treated with EMR-C.

Most gastric cancer patients with jaundice caused by extensive liver metastasis show no tumor shrinkage response to systemic chemotherapy, while often showing severe adverse reactions. Their prognosis is very poor. We experienced two patients for whom hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin through an implantable port was effective for treating extensive liver metastasis. One patient had jaundice (serum bilirubin level before HAI therapy, 12.4 mg/dl) caused by metachronous liver metastasis, and prior systemic chemotherapy with 5-FU and irinotecan had not been effective. The other patient had gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis and also exhibited jaundice (serum bilirubin level before HAI therapy, 11.8 mg/dl). Both patients were treated with HAI of cisplatin, 20 mg/m(2) for 30 min on day 1, and continuous intraarterial infusion of 5-FU, 300 mg/m(2), from day 1 to day 4 every week. Their metastatic liver tumors were significantly reduced in volume and the jaundice disappeared. They survived for 30 and 27 weeks, respectively. A pharmacokinetic study conducted during the period of partial remission revealed that the extraction ratios of 5-FU and cisplatin in the liver were 0.89 and 0.024, respectively, suggesting a favorable first-pass effect of 5-FU. Although our findings here suggest that the successful local control of liver metastasis could improve the deteriorated condition and prolong the survival in some patients with far advanced cancer, it is essential to pay much attention to possible adverse effects during the treatment.