Search

Background: The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has caused a global COVID-19 pandemic, leading to worldwide changes in public health measures. In addition to changes in the public sector (lockdowns, contact restrictions), hospitals modified care to minimize risk of infection and to mobilize resources for COVID-19 patients. Our study aimed to assess the impact of these measures on access to care and behaviour of patients with thoracic malignancies.Methods: Thoracic oncology patients were surveyed in October 2020 using paper-based questionnaires to assess access to ambulatory care services and tumor-directed therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, behaviour regarding social distancing and wearing of face masks were assessed, as well as COVID-19 exposure, testing and vaccination. Results are presented as absolute and relative frequencies for categorical variables and means with standard deviation for numerical variables. We used t-test, and ANOVA to compare differences in metric variables and Chi2-test to compare proportions between groups.Results: 93 of 245 (38%) patients surveyed completed the questionnaire. Respiration therapy and physical therapy were unavailable for 57% to 70% of patients during March/April. Appointments for tumor-directed therapy, tumor imaging, and follow-up care were postponed or cancelled for 18.9%, 13.6%, and 14.8% of patients, respectively. Patients reported their general health as mostly unaffected. The majority of patients surveyed did not report reducing their contacts with family. The majority reduced contact with friends. Most patients wore community masks, although a significant proportion reported respiratory difficulties during prolonged mask-wearing. 74 patients (80%) reported willingness to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2.Conclusions: This survey provides insights into the patient experience during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Munich, Germany. Most patients reported no negative changes to cancer treatments or general health; however, allied health services were greatly impacted. Patients reported gaps in social distancing, but were prepared to wear community masks. The willingness to get vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 was high. This information is not only of high relevance to policy makers, but also to health care providers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment of advanced NSCLC, leading to a string of approvals in recent years. Herein, a narrative review on the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) in the ever-evolving treatment landscape of advanced NSCLC is presented. Methods: This comprehensive review will begin with an introduction into current treatment paradigms incorporating ICIs; the evolution of CT-based criteria; moving onto novel phenomena observed with ICIs and the current state of hybrid imaging for diagnosis, treatment planning, evaluation of treatment efficacy and toxicity in advanced NSCLC, also taking into consideration its limitations and future directions. Conclusions: The advent of ICIs marks the dawn of a new era bringing forth new challenges particularly vis-à-vis treatment response assessment and observation of novel phenomena accompanied by novel systemic side effects. While FDG PET/CT is widely adopted for tumor volume delineation in locally advanced disease, response assessment to immunotherapy based on current criteria is of high clinical value but has its inherent limitations. In recent years, modifications of established (PET)/CT criteria have been proposed to provide more refined approaches towards response evaluation. Not only a comprehensive inclusion of PET-based response criteria in prospective randomized controlled trials, but also a general harmonization within the variety of PET-based response criteria is pertinent to strengthen clinical implementation and widespread use of hybrid imaging for response assessment in NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • Most genes involved in collagen metabolism are upregulated in NSCLC. • High expression of those genes is associated with poor outcome. • In vitro RAS inhibitors led to a dose dependent decrease of collagen deposition. • RAS inhibitor intake was associated with improved survival in a large NSCLC cohort. • Our results point towards collagen biosynthesis as a promising target in NSCLC. The tumor-microenvironment (TME) represents an attractive therapeutic target in NSCLC and plays an important role for efficacy of cancer therapeutics. We hypothesized that upregulation of collagen synthesis might be associated with adverse outcome in NSCLC. Literature evidence suggests that renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) decrease collagen deposition. Therefore, we aimed to explore the prognostic role of RASi intake and their influence on the TME in NSCLC. Four publicly available datasets were used to evaluate the impact of key enzymes involved in collagen biosynthesis. To investigate the influence of RASi intake on the TME and prognosis we evaluated a cohort of metastatic NSCLC patients and performed histopathological characterization of the TME. A three-dimensional microtissue in vitro model was developed to define the impact of RASi on collagen synthesis. Expression of three genes of the collagen synthesis pathway, ALDH18A1 , PLOD2 and P4HA1 , was upregulated in NSCLC compared to normal lung tissue and linked to shortened overall survival in all investigated cohorts. Together, these genes formed a 'Collagen Signature' which represents an independent unfavourable prognostic factor in two NSCLC cohorts and was linked to alterations of the extracellular matrix deposition and cell cycle pathways. In the cohort of metastatic NSCLC, RASi intake was linked to improved overall response rate and survival. Exploratory in vitro experiments revealed that RASi led to a dose dependent reduction of collagen deposition and degradation of three-dimensional lung cancer cell spheroids. We demonstrate that collagen synthesis is a key upregulated process in the NSCLC TME and its transcriptional readout, the three gene Collagen Signature is independently associated with poor outcome. Pharmacological targeting of this pathways e.g. by RASi bears potential of improving outcome in NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Treatment with single agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has tremendously changed second line therapy in NSCLC. However, there are still no reliable biomarkers predicting response and survival in this group of patients. PD-L1 revealed to be a correlating, but no perfect marker. Therefore, we sought to investigate in this prospective study, whether inflammation status and cytokine profile could serve as additional biomarkers guiding treatment decision for single agent ICIs in NSCLC. 29 stage IV NSCLC patients receiving single agent PD-1 checkpoint-inhibitor in second line were prospectively enrolled. Inflammatory scores and cytokine profiles (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IFN-γ and TNFα) have been obtained before treatment and at the time of the first staging. Cytokine profiles were correlated with response and survival. Patients with signs of pre-therapeutic inflammation (elevated, NLR, SII, IL-6, IL-8) showed significantly lower response to ICI treatment and reduced PFS. Contrary, elevated levels of IFN-γ revealed to characterize a subgroup of patients, who significantly benefits from ICI treatment. Furthermore, low systemic inflammation and high levels of IFN-γ characterized patients with long term-response to ICI treatment. Pre-therapeutic assessment of inflammation and cytokine profiles has the ability to predict response and survival in NSCLC patients treated with single agent ICIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune microenvironment plays a critical role in lung cancer control versus progression and metastasis. In this investigation, we explored the effect of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte subpopulations on lung cancer biology by studying in vitro cocultures, in vivo mouse models, and human lung cancer tissue. Lymphocyte conditioned media (CM) induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and migration in both primary human lung cancer cells and cell lines. Correspondingly, major accumulation of Th9 and Th17 cells was detected in human lung cancer tissue and correlated with poor survival. Coculturing lung cancer cells with Th9/Th17 cells or exposing them to the respective CM induced EMT in cancer cells and modulated the expression profile of genes implicated in EMT and metastasis. These features were reproduced by the signatory cytokines IL-9 and IL-17, with gene regulatory profiles evoked by these cytokines partly overlapping and partly complementary. Coinjection of Th9/Th17 cells with tumor cells in WT, Rag1-/-, Il9r-/-, and Il17ra-/- mice altered tumor growth and metastasis. Accordingly, inhibition of IL-9 or IL-17 cytokines by neutralizing antibodies decreased EMT and slowed lung cancer progression and metastasis. In conclusion, Th9 and Th17 lymphocytes induce lung cancer cell EMT, thereby promoting migration and metastatic spreading and offering potentially novel therapeutic strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Loco-regional and distant failure are common in inoperable stage III non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, there is limited real-world data on failure pattern, patient prognosis and salvage options.Methods: We analysed 99 consecutive patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC treated with CRT between 2011 and 2016. Follow up CT scans from date of the first-site failure were matched with the delivered radiation treatment plans. Intra-thoracic loco-regional relapse was defined as in-field (IFR) vs. out-of-field recurrence (OFR) [in- vs. outside 50Gy isodose line in the involved lung], respectively. Extracranial distant (DMs) and brain metastases (BMs) as first site of recurrence were also evaluated. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, impact of salvage surgery (sS), radiotherapy (sRT), chemotherapy (sCT) and immunotherapy (sIO) on patient survival was assessed.Results: Median follow-up was 60.0 months. Median PFS from the end of CRT for the entire cohort was 7.5 (95% CI: 6.0-9.0 months) months. Twenty-six (26%) and 25 (25%) patients developed IFR and OFR. Median time to diagnosis of IFR and OFR was 7.2 and 6.2 months. In the entire cohort, onset of IFR and OFR did not influence patient outcome. However, in 73 (74%) patients who survived longer than 12 months after initial diagnosis, IFR was a significant negative prognostic factor with a median survival of 19.3 vs 40.0 months (p < 0.001). No patients with IFR underwent sS and/or sRT. 18 (70%) and 5 (19%) patients with IFR underwent sCT and sIO. Three (12%) patients with OFR underwent sS and are still alive with 3-year survival rate of 100%. 5 (20%) patients with OFR underwent sRT with a median survival of 71.2 vs 19.1 months (p = 0.014). Four (16%) patients with OFR received sIO with a numerical survival benefit (64.6 vs. 26.4 months, p = 0.222). DMs and BMs were detected in 27 (27%) and 16 (16%) patients after median time of 5.8 and 5.13 months. Both had no impact on patient outcome in the entire cohort. However, patients with more than three BMs showed significantly poor OS (9.3 vs 26.0 months; p = 0.012).Conclusions: After completion of CRT, IFR was a negative prognostic factor in those patients, who survived longer than 12 months after initial diagnosis. Patients with OFR benefit significantly from salvage local treatment. Patients with more than three BMs as first site of failure had a significantly inferior outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/aim: mmune checkpoint inhibition (CPI) has an increasing impact in the multimodal treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Increasing evidence suggests treatment outcome depending on tumor cell PD-L1 expression. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells in combination with CD8+ tumor stroma-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density in inoperable LA-NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT).Patients and Method: We retrospectively assessed clinical characteristics and initial tumor biopsy samples of 31 inoperable LA-NSCLC patients treated with concurrent CRT. Prognostic impact of tumor cell PD-L1 expression (0% versus ≥1%) and CD8+ TIL density (0-40% vs. 41-100%) for local control, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as well as correlations with clinicopathological features were evaluated.Results: Median OS was 14 months (range: 3-167 months). The OS rates at 1- and 2 years were 68 and 20%. Local control of the entire cohort at 1 and 2 years were 74 and 61%. Median PFS, 1-year and 2-year PFS were 13 ± 1.4 months, 58 and 19%. PD-L1 expression < 1% on tumor cells was associated with improved OS, PFS and local control in patients treated with concurrent CRT. Univariate analysis showed a trend towards improved OS and local control in patients with low CD8+ TIL density. Evaluation of Tumor Immunity in the MicroEnvironment (TIME) appears to be an independent prognostic factor for local control, PFS and OS. The longest and shortest OS were achieved in patients with type I (PD-L1neg/CD8low) and type IV (PD-L1pos/CD8low) tumors (median OS: 57 ± 37 vs. 10 ± 5 months, p = 0.05), respectively.Conclusion: Assessment of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells in combination with CD8+ TIL density can be a predictive biomarker in patients with inoperable LA-NSCLC treated with concurrent CRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET exon 14 skipping (METΔ14ex) remains controversial. 110 consecutive METΔ14ex NSCLC patients receiving first-line chemotherapy (CHT) and/or immunotherapy (IO) in 10 German centers between 2016–2022 were analyzed. Combined CHT-IO was given to 35/110 (32%) patients, IO alone to 43/110 (39%), and CHT to 32/110 (29%) upfront. Compared to CHT, CHT-IO showed longer progression-free survival (median PFS 6 vs. 2.5 months, p = 0.004), more objective responses (ORR 49% vs. 28%, p = 0.086) and numerically longer overall survival (OS 16 vs. 10 months, p = 0.240). For IO monotherapy, OS (14 vs. 16 months) and duration of response (26 vs. 22 months) were comparable to those of CHT-IO. Primary progressive disease (PD) was more frequent with IO compared to CHT-IO (13/43 vs. 3/35, p = 0.018), particularly for never-smokers (p = 0.041). Higher PD-L1 TPS were not associated with better IO outcomes, but TP53 mutated tumors showed numerically improved ORR (56% vs. 32%, p = 0.088) and PFS (6 vs. 3 months, p = 0.160), as well as longer OS in multivariable analysis (HR=0.54, p = 0.034) compared to their wild-type counterparts. Any second-line treatment was administered to 35/75 (47%) patients, with longer survival for capmatinib or tepotinib compared to crizotinib (PFS 10 vs. 3 months, p = 0.013; OS 16 vs. 13 months, p = 0.270). CHT-IO is superior to CHT, and IO alone also effective for METΔ14ex NSCLC, especially in the presence of TP53 mutations and independent of PD-L1 expression, but never-smokers are at higher risk of primary PD. • Chemoimmunotherapy prolongs PFS compared to chemotherapy in METΔ14ex NSCLC. • IO monotherapy confer long responses and OS similar to that of CHT-IO. • PD-L1 expression does not correlate with immunotherapeutic efficacy. • TP53 mutations are linked to better IO outcomes and may assist therapeutic decisions. • The rate of second-line treatment in the real-world setting is approximately 50%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We analysed a correlation between pre- to post-treatment primary tumour metabolic volume (PT-MV) reduction on 18F-FDG-PET/CT and survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT).Methods: Sixty consecutive patients with NSCLC stage IIIA-B (UICC 7th edition), treated with chemoradiotherapy, who underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT at the same institution before and 6 weeks after treatment, were analysed. Different metabolic response values were investigated on their correlation with survival parameters: complete response (100% PT-MV reduction); major response (80-99% PT-MV reduction); moderate response (50-79% PT-MV reduction); minor response (1-49% PT-MV reduction) and non-response (no change or increase in uptake).Results: From 60 patients, 52 (87%) had repeat PET/CT scans 6 weeks after completion of CRT. Complete metabolic response (CR) was reached in ten (17%), whereas major and moderate metabolic responses occurred in 16 (27%) and 15 (25%) patients, respectively. Four patients (7%) had minor metabolic response. Non-response was documented in seven patients (12%). Median overall survival (MS) for the entire cohort was 17 months (95% CI: 11.9-22.1 months). MS according to the different metabolic response values was as follows: 34 months (95% CI: 0-84.1); 22 months (95% CI: 14.2-29.8); 12 months (95% CI: 0.4-23.6); 11 months (95% CI: 0.2-21.8) and 17 months in patients with complete, major, moderate, minor and non-response (95% CI: 6.7-27.3), respectively (p = 0.008).On multivariate analysis, significant predictors of survival included ECOG performance status (p = 0.035, HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.25-0.95) as well as complete and major metabolic response as a continuous variable with PT-MV reduction of at least 80% (p = 0.021, HR 0.36, 95% CI: 0.15-0.86). Moderate metabolic response did not correlate with improved outcome (p = 0.522).Conclusions: In this homogeneous locally-advanced NSCLC single-centre patient cohort, a PT-MV reduction of at least 80% (complete and major metabolic response) following CRT was necessary to significantly improve patient outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Treatment perspectives for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been significantly expanded by the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors into multimodal therapy concepts. Currently, combined, immune checkpoint-inhibitor-based therapy concepts are also advancing into early, resectable stages of NSCLC. Neoadjuvant and perioperative chemoimmunotherapy opened up a promising new preoperative treatment approach, but also raises some new questions and challenges. With the expanded perioperative treatment options and the perspective on a further improvement in the absence of recurrence after tumor resection, there is push towards comprehensively collecting therapy-relevant findings for imaging, molecular and histopathological diagnostics at an early stage. All patients with lung carcinoma, regardless of the therapy intention, should be presented to an interdisciplinary tumor board with thoracic oncological expertise. This is regularly given in certified lung cancer centers.A standardized procedure contributes to optimized pre-therapeutic diagnostics and facilitates coordination for the best possible multimodal approach in the interdisciplinary tumor board. In the case of centrally located resectable tumors, for example, neoadjuvant treatment increases the chances of a procedure that is as parenchymal sparing as possible. Some questions cannot yet be answered conclusively. Perioperative systemic therapy with molecular-targeted and immune checkpoint inhibitors is the subject of numerous ongoing studies. The considerable dynamics in newly approved therapies and the development of perioperative therapy concepts require continuous adaptation of diagnostic algorithms and standards. Integration into standard pre-surgical routine makes rapid classification of the relevant findings as well as close coordination between the diagnostic and interventional disciplines essential., Competing Interests: KW: Aktienbesitz (AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, Bayer, Novartis, J&J); indirekte Interessen (Präsidentschaft DGT 2021-23; VS-Mitgliedschaft DGT, DGCH; VS Mitgliedschaft ESTS); Mitarbeit an Advisory Boards/Data Safety Monitoring Boards (AstraZeneca, BMS, Roche, J&J). DJ: Erstattung von Fortbildungsbeiträgen. AD: Honorare für Vortragstätigkeit (Takeda); Mitarbeit an Advisory Boards/Data Safety Monitoring Boards (BMS). CKS: Honorare für Beratungstätigkeit (AstraZeneca, Amgen, BMS, Daiichi-Sankyo, MSD, onkowissen, Roche, Sanofi), Honorare für Vortragstätigkeit (Amgen, AstraZeneca, Art tempi/medtoday, BMS, Daiichi-Sankyo, MSD, Lilly, Novartis, onkowissen, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Streamed Up, Takeda); indirekte Interessen (AIO, POA, SDGP); Reise-/Tagungskostenzuschüsse (Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS Boheringer Ingelheim, Janssen). AS: Honorare für Vortragstätigkeit; Mitarbeit an Advisory Boards (Aignostics, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eli Lilly, Illumina, Incyte, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Qlucore, QuiP, Roche, Sanofi, Seagen, Servier, Takeda, Thermo Fisher); Förderung von Forschungsvorhaben (Bayer, BMS, Chugai, Incyte). AT: Honorare für Beratungstätigkeit; Honorare für Vortragstätigkeit (AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Daiichi-Sankyo, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi); indirekte Interessen (AIO, ERS); Reise-/Tagungskostenzuschüsse (AstraZeneca, BMS, Daiichi-Sankyo, MSD, Janssen, Sanofi). MZ: Honorare für Beratungstätigkeit (AstraZeneca, BMS, Novocure); Honorare für Vortragstätigkeit (AstraZeneca); Mitarbeit an Advisory Boards (AstraZeneca, BMS); Reise-/Tagungskostenzuschüsse (AstraZeneca, BMS). MT: Förderung von Forschungsvorhaben (AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck, Roche Takeda); Honorare für Beratungstätigkeit; Mitarbeit an Advisory Boards (Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda); Honorare für Vortragstätigkeit; Mitarbeit an Advisory Boards (Amgen, AstraZeneca, Beigene, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda); Reise-/Tagungskostenzuschüsse (AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda)., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

This study investigates the predictive capability of radiomics in determining programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (>=1%) status in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using a newly collected [18F]FDG PET/CT dataset. We aimed to replicate and validate the radiomics-based machine learning (ML) model proposed by Zhao et al. [1] predicting PD-L1 status from PET/CT-imaging. An independent cohort of 254 NSCLC patients underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging, with primary tumor segmentation conducted using lung tissue window (LTW) and more conservative soft tissue window (STW) methods. Radiomics models ("Rad-score" and "complex model") and a clinical-stage model from Zhao et al. were evaluated via 10-fold cross-validation and AUC analysis, alongside a benchmark-study comparing different ML-model pipelines. Clinicopathological data were collected from medical records. On our data, the Rad-score model yielded mean AUCs of 0.593 (STW) and 0.573 (LTW), below Zhao et al.'s 0.761. The complex model achieved mean AUCs of 0.505 (STW) and 0.519 (LTW), lower than Zhao et al.'s 0.769. The clinical model showed a mean AUC of 0.555, below Zhao et al.'s 0.64. All models performed significantly lower than Zhao et al.'s findings. Our benchmark study on four ML pipelines revealed consistently low performance across all configurations. Our study failed to replicate original findings, suggesting poor model performance and questioning predictive value of radiomics features in classifying PD-L1 expression from PET/CT imaging. These results highlight challenges in replicating radiomics-based ML models and stress the need for rigorous validation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Node-positive non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) present a challenge for treatment decisions, particularly in patients ineligible for concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) due to poor performance status and compromised lung function. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of pretreatment positron emission tomography (PET) parameters in high-risk patients undergoing hypofractionated radiotherapy., Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 42 consecutive patients with inoperable node-positive NSCLC, who underwent hypofractionated radiotherapy between 2014 and 2021 at a single institution. Clinical, treatment-related, and [ 18 F]FDG PET-based parameters were correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Median dichotomisation was performed to establish risk groups. Statistical analyses included univariable and multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses., Results: After a median follow-up of 47.1 months (range: 0.5-101.7), the median PFS and OS were 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.4-22.0), and 24.3 months (95% CI: 14.1-31.8). In univariable Cox regression analysis, significant predictors of PFS included receipt of salvage systemic treatment (p=0.007), SUVmax (p=0.032), and tMTV (p=0.038). Similarly, ECOG-PS (p=0.014), Histology (p=0.046), and tMTV (p=0.028) were significant predictors of OS. Multivariable Cox regression analysis (MVA) identified SUVmax as a significant predictor for PFS [HR: 2.29 (95% CI: 1.02-5.15); p=0.044]. For OS, ECOG-PS remained a significant prognosticator [HR: 3.53 (95% CI: 1.49-8.39); p=0.004], and tMTV approached significance [HR: 2.24 (95% CI: 0.95-5.26); p=0.065]. Furthermore, the high tMTV group exhibited a median PFS of 5.3 months [95% CI: 2.8-10.4], while the low tMTV group had a PFS of 15.2 months [95% CI: 10.1-33.5] (p=0.038, log-rank test). Median OS was 33.5 months [95% CI: 18.3-56.8] for tMTV ≤ 36.6 ml vs. 14.1 months [95% CI: 8.1-27.2] for tMTV > 36.6 ml (p=0.028, log-rank test)., Conclusion: Pretreatment PET parameters, especially tMTV, hold promise as prognostic indicators in NSCLC patients undergoing hypofractionated radiotherapy. The study highlights the potential of PET metrics as biomarkers for patient stratification., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Rationale: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related pneumonitis is a serious autoimmune event affecting as many as 20% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet the factors underpinning its development in some patients and not others are poorly understood. Objectives: To investigate the role of autoantibodies and autoreactive T cells against surfactant-related proteins in the development of pneumonitis. Methods: The study cohort consisted of patients with NSCLC who provided blood samples before and during ICI treatment. Serum was used for proteomics analyses and to detect autoantibodies present during pneumonitis. T-cell stimulation assays and single-cell RNA sequencing were performed to investigate the specificity and functionality of peripheral autoreactive T cells. The findings were confirmed in a validation cohort comprising patients with NSCLC and patients with melanoma. Measurements and Main Results: Across both cohorts, patients in whom pneumonitis developed had higher pretreatment levels of immunoglobulin G autoantibodies targeting surfactant protein (SP)-B. At the onset of pneumonitis, these patients also exhibited higher frequencies of CD4 + IFN-γ-positive SP-B-specific T cells and expanding T-cell clonotypes recognizing this protein, accompanied by a proinflammatory serum proteomic profile. Conclusions: Our data suggest that the cooccurrence of SP-B-specific immunoglobulin G autoantibodies and CD4 + T cells is associated with the development of pneumonitis during ICI therapy. Pretreatment levels of these antibodies may represent a potential biomarker for an increased risk of developing pneumonitis, and on-treatment levels may provide a diagnostic aid.

HER2 mutation and amplification have been identified as distinct molecular targets in lung cancer with different therapeutic and prognostic values. The coexistence of HER2 and EGFR mutations is extremely rare, and therefore, no data exist on the best treatment in these cases., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2024 The Authors.)

The wide use of immune checkpoint inhibitors has increased the frequency of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). While many are managed with corticosteroids or hormone substitution, up to 14.9% of irAEs are steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent and thus require second-line treatment. These should reduce irAE-related morbidity and mortality and induce a few side effects of their own while maintaining the antitumor response. There is little comparative data on second-line therapies for irAEs. Two cases of irAEs could not be sufficiently managed with corticosteroids and subsequently received treatment with extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), including one patient with immune-related erosive oral lichen planus and one patient with immune-related colitis. In both cases, the irAE resolved with ECP in combination with immunosuppressive drugs, that is 4 weeks and 10 weeks after the start of ECP, respectively. To investigate this approach, a prospective clinical study that compares ECP and other second-line therapies for the treatment of steroid-refractory and steroid-dependent irAEs with regard to immunophenotype and therapy response has been designed. ECP could be a treatment option for steroid-refractory and steroid-dependent irAEs, given its good safety profile and lack of adverse effects on antitumor response. Comparative prospective studies are needed to generate an evidence base., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate a first-site-metastasis pattern (FSMP) in unresectable stage III NSCLC after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) with or without immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI)., Methods: We defined three patient subgroups according to the year of initial multimodal treatment: A (2011-2014), B (2015-2017) and C (2018-2020). Different treatment-related parameters were analyzed. Observed outcome parameters were brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS), extracranial distant metastasis-free survival (ecDMFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS)., Results: 136 patients treated between 2011 and 2020 were included with ≥ 60.0 Gy total dose and concurrent chemotherapy (cCRT); thirty-six (26%) received ICI. Median follow-up was 49.7 (range:0.7-126.1), median OS 31.2 (95% CI:16.4-30.3) months (23.4 for non-ICI vs not reached for ICI patients, p = 0.001). Median BMFS/ecDMFS/DMFS in subgroups A, B and C was 14.9/16.3/14.7 months, 20.6/12.9/12.7 months and not reached (NR)/NR/36.4 months (p = 0.004/0.001/0.016). For cCRT+ICI median BMFS was 53.1 vs. 19.1 months for cCRT alone (p = 0.005). Median ecDMFS achieved 55.2 vs. 17.9 (p = 0.003) and median DMFS 29.5 (95% CI: 1.4-57.6) vs 14.93 (95% CI:10.8-19.0) months (p = 0.031), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age over 65 (HR:1.629; p = 0.036), GTV ≥ 78 cc (HR: 2.100; p = 0.002) and V20 ≥ 30 (HR: 2.400; p = 0.002) were negative prognosticators for BMFS and GTV ≥ 78 cc for ecDMFS (HR: 1.739; p = 0.027). After onset of brain metastasis (BM), patients survived 13.3 (95% CI: 6.4-20.2) months and 8.6 months (95% CI: 1.6-15.5) after extracranial-distant-metastasis (ecDM). Patients with ecDM as FSMP reached significantly worse overall survival of 22.1 (range:14.4-29.8) vs. 40.1 (range:18.7-61.3) months (p = 0.034) in the rest of cohort. In contrast, BM as FSMP had no impact on OS., Conclusion: This retrospective analysis of inoperable stage III NSCLC patients revealed that age over 65, V20 ≥ 30 and GTV ≥ 78 cc were prognosticators for BMFS and GTV ≥ 78 cc for ecDMFS. ICI treatment led to a significant improvement of BMFS, ecDMFS and DMFS. ecDM as FSMP was associated with significant deterioration of OS, whereas BM as FSMP was not., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Despite many advances in molecular procedures many lung cancer patients do not receive full panel testing. This can limit the comprehensive understanding of their disease and potentially hinder personalized treatment options., Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we used results from next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing of 154 patients with adenocarcinoma (AC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung treated at the University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität (LMU) Munich between 2018 and 2021. We compared different clinicopathological features and patients' baseline characteristics with results of NGS testing. We used t -test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare metric- and χ 2 -test and Fisher's exact test to compare categorical variables., Results: NGS testing found mutations in 107 (69.5%) patients; 44 patients (28.6%) had more than one mutation. The majority (79.2%) of patients had AC and 64.9% were metastasized at diagnosis. Patients with detected mutations had significantly higher PD-L1 expression than those without mutations (36.4% vs. 19.2%, P=0.005). Mean PD-L1 expression also differed between different mutations ranging from 24.0% in EGFR to 56.8% in patients with MET alterations, and increased with the number of different mutations (P=0.07). EGFR mutations were significantly more common in females compared to males (22.9% vs. 9.5%, P=0.04) and PIK3CA mutations significantly more common in SCC (21.9% vs. 2.5%, P=0.004). We found 23 different mutations in AC and 13 different gene mutations in SCC., Conclusions: Mutation profiles differed by histological type and metastases status and were significantly associated with PD-L1 expression. In the context of limited resources, our results may help prioritize patient for testing when tissue material and funding is limited., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-23-751/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

Despite therapeutic advances, early mortality in lung cancer is still prevalent. In this study, we aimed to assess risk factors for 30- and 60-day mortality in German lung cancer patients. In this retrospective cross-sectional analysis, we used data of lung cancer patients treated at LMU Hospital Munich between 2015 and 2019. We categorized patients into 30-day mortality, 60 day-mortality, and longer survival. We used Student's t-test and ANOVA to compare means and Chi 2 -test to compare frequencies. We used logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with a risk for early mortality. Of the 2454 lung cancer patients, 2.0% (n = 50) died within 30 and 1.7% (n = 41) within 30 to 60 days of diagnosis. Older age and advanced stage at diagnosis were significantly associated with early mortality in the univariate and the multivariate analysis. Patients in the 30-day mortality group significantly more often did not receive tumor-directed therapy. They were also more likely to die in an acute care setting compared to the 60-day mortality group. The group of patients who died unexpectedly (12.0%) was dominantly female, with a high proportion of patients with unintentional weight loss at the time of diagnosis. Our results suggest that in the treatment of patients with lung cancer there is a need for a greater focus on older patients. Moreover, physicians should pay special attention to females with recent weight loss and patients with a comorbidity of diabetes mellitus or renal impairment. Engaging a case manager focused on detecting patients with the above characteristics could help improve overall care., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

As a result of advances in the treatment of lung cancer, the life expectancy of lung cancer patients has improved significantly, but it remains the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. For decades, most of the initial tumor biopsies have been obtained by bronchoscopy or computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic lung biopsy without concerning reports of cancer seeding following the latter. In this case report we discuss the patient history of a 56-year old women with low-differentiated squamous cell lung cancer who developed tumor seeding following a CT-guided transthoracic biopsy 11 months after the intervention. This is put into context reviewing former and current literature., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

The current S3 Lung Cancer Guidelines are edited with fundamental changes to the previous edition based on the dynamic influx of information to this field:The recommendations include de novo a mandatory case presentation for all patients with lung cancer in a multidisciplinary tumor board before initiation of treatment, furthermore CT-Screening for asymptomatic patients at risk (after federal approval), recommendations for incidental lung nodule management , molecular testing of all NSCLC independent of subtypes, EGFR-mutations in resectable early stage lung cancer in relapsed or recurrent disease, adjuvant TKI-therapy in the presence of common EGFR-mutations, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in resected lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, obligatory evaluation of PD-L1-status, consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-pos. tumor, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition in patients withPD-L1 ≥ 50% stage IIIA and treatment options in PD-L1 ≥ 50% tumors independent of PD-L1status and targeted therapy and treatment option immune chemotherapy in first line SCLC patients.Based on the current dynamic status of information in this field and the turnaround time required to implement new options, a transformation to a "living guideline" was proposed., Competing Interests: Die Ergebnisse der Interessenkonfliktbewertung und die Konsequenzen sind der Tabelle im Leitlinienreport (dort Kapitel 11.2) zu entnehmen., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

In rheumatic diseases the possibility of pulmonary manifestation must always be considered and checked. Interstitial lung disease can often be fatal in these cases. In the presented case, the link between progressive dyspnea and newly occurring skin irritation is to be seen as particularly important. A good outcome can be achieved by immediate therapy with immunosuppression and plasmapheresis., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: In patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), durvalumab maintenance treatment after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) significantly improves survival. So far, however, metabolic changes of tumoral lesions and secondary lymphoid organs under durvalumab are unknown. Hence, we assessed changes on [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT in comparison to patients undergoing CRT alone., Methods: Forty-three patients with [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT both before and after standard CRT for unresectable stage III NSCLC were included, in 16/43 patients durvalumab maintenance treatment was initiated (CRT-IO) prior to the second PET/CT. Uptake of tumor sites and secondary lymphoid organs was compared between CRT and CRT-IO. Also, readers were blinded for durvalumab administration and reviewed scans for findings suspicious for immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAE)., Results: Initial uptake characteristics were comparable. However, under durvalumab, diverging metabolic patterns were noted: There was a significantly higher reduction of tumoral uptake intensity in CRT-IO compared to CRT, e.g. median decrease of SUV max -70.0% vs. -24.8%, p = 0.009. In contrast, the spleen uptake increased in CRT-IO while it dropped in CRT (median + 12.5% vs. -4.4%, p = 0.029). Overall survival was significantly longer in CRT-IO compared to CRT with few events (progression/death) noted in CRT-IO. Findings suggestive of irAE were present on PET/CT more often in CRT-IO (12/16) compared to CRT (8/27 patients), p = 0.005., Conclusion: Durvalumab maintenance treatment after CRT leads to diverging tumoral metabolic changes, but also increases splenic metabolism and leads to a higher proportion of findings suggestive of irAE compared to patients without durvalumab. Due to significantly prolonged survival with durvalumab, survival analysis will be substantiated in correlation to metabolic changes as soon as more clinical events are present., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: In 2016, the University of Munich Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) was implemented to initiate a precision oncology program. This review of cases was conducted to assess clinical implications and functionality of the program, to identify current limitations and to inform future directions of these efforts., Methods: Charts, molecular profiles, and tumor board decisions of the first 1000 consecutive cases (01/2016-03/2020) were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were applied to describe relevant findings., Results: Of the first 1000 patients presented to the MTB; 914 patients received comprehensive genomic profiling. Median age of patients was 56 years and 58% were female. The most prevalent diagnoses were breast (16%) and colorectal cancer (10%). Different types of targeted or genome-wide sequencing assays were used; most of them offered by the local department of pathology. Testing was technically successful in 88%. In 41% of cases, a genomic alteration triggered a therapeutic recommendation. The fraction of patients receiving a tumor board recommendation differed significantly between malignancies ranging from over 50% in breast or biliary tract to less than 30% in pancreatic cancers. Based on a retrospective chart review, 17% of patients with an MTB recommendation received appropriate treatment., Conclusion: Based on these retrospective analyses, patients with certain malignancies (breast and biliary tract cancer) tend to be more likely to have actionable variants. The low rate of therapeutic implementation (17% of patients receiving a tumor board recommendation) underscores the importance of meticulous follow-up for these patients and ensuring broad access to innovative therapies for patients receiving molecular tumor profiling., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by aggressive growth and poor prognosis. Although SCLC affects nearly exclusively heavy smokers and leads to frequent respiratory symptoms, the impact of pre-therapeutic lung function testing in SCLC is sparely investigated until now. Therefore, we sought to examine whether we could find prognostic markers in pre-therapeutic lung function testing of SCLC patients., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analysed a cohort of 205 patients with the diagnosis of SCLC between 2010 and 2018. Pre-therapeutic values of spirometry, body plethysmography and measurement of diffusing capacity was extracted from patients' charts. Comparisons between groups were performed using the Mann-Whitney U- test or by chi-square tests as appropriate. Kaplan-Meier analyses and COX-regression models were performed to correlate lung function parameters with patients' outcome., Results: Airway obstruction itself, or the diagnosis chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on GOLD definitions did not correlate with survival in SCLC patients. Hyperinflation measured by increased residual volume and residual volume to total lung capacity ratio (log-rank p  < 0.001) and reduced diffusing capacity (log-rank p  = 0.007) were associated with reduced survival. Furthermore, patients with hyperinflation as well as impairments in gas exchange representing an emphysematic phenotype had the worst outcome (log-rank p  < 0.001)., Conclusion: We recommend including body plethysmography and measurement of diffusing capacity in the pre-therapeutic assessment of SCLC patients. Our findings suggest that reduction of hyperinflation may lead to better outcome in SCLC patients. Thus, in addition to effective tumour therapy, adequate therapy of the comorbidity of COPD should also be provided. In particular, measures to reduce hyperinflation by means of dual bronchodilation as well as respiratory physiotherapy should be further assessed in this setting.

Background: EGFR exon20 insertions (ex20ins) are targeted by novel compounds in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data about outcome under conventional therapies and the influence of molecular features are scarce., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analysed 118 patients with evaluation of radiologic response based on RECIST v1.1. TP53 status was available for 88 cases., Results: Platinum doublets and chemoimmunotherapy showed similar response rates (20-25%), disease control rates (80%) and median progression-free survival (mPFS, ≈7 months), which were longer compared to monochemotherapy (9%, 59%, 4.1 months), EGFR inhibitors (0%, 46%, 3.0) and PD-(L)1 inhibitors (0%, 30%, 2.1; p < 0.05). Overall survival (OS) was not dependent on the choice of first-line treatment, but related to more lines of systemic therapy (p < 0.05). TP53 mutations and brain metastases were associated with shorter PFS under platinum doublets and EGFR inhibitors (HR 3.3-6.1, p < 0.01), and shorter OS for patients receiving both treatments (p < 0.05). More tumour CD8 + and less Th1 cells were associated with longer OS independent of brain and TP53 status (p < 0.01). No difference in outcome was noted according to the ex20ins site and use of pemetrexed (vs. other cytotoxics) or bevacizumab. Long-lasting responses (>1 year) occasionally occurred under EGFR inhibitors for both 'near-' and 'far-loop' variants., Conclusions: Platinum doublets and chemoimmunotherapy have the highest activity with ORR of 20-25% and mPFS of approximately 7 months, regardless of the cytotoxic partner, while PD-(L)1 inhibitors show limited efficacy. TP53 mutations, brain metastases and a lower tumour CD8/Th1-cell ratio are independently associated with shorter survival., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement PC: research funding from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, and advisory board/lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda. JR: lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim. FCS: research funding from Roche; non-financial support from Lilly; personal fees from Takeda, and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. BH: advisory board/lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, MSD, Roche, Pfizer. JK: research funding from AstraZeneca and Celgene. MJ: speaker's honoraria from Roche, Boehringer, and travel grants from Daiichi Sankyo. DK: advisory boards/speakers honoraria from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda. FE: speaker's honoraria from Roche. FB: research funding from AstraZeneca, BMS and Roche, and travel grants from BMS and MSD. RS: research funding from BMS, and speaker's honoraria from AstraZeneca and Roche. AT: research funding from BMS. MW: research funding from Roche; Personal fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, Boehringer, Kite, Novartis, Merck, BMS, Heidelberg Pharma; Non-financial support from AstraZeneca, BMS, Glenmark; outside the submitted work. SL: advisory board, speaker's honoraria and travel support from BerGenBio, Novartis, Lilly, BMS, MSD, Roche, Celgene, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, as well as research funding from Roche, BMS, BerGenBio. WB: consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi. Travel grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Roche. CS: advisory board honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Takeda. Speaker's honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer, Lilly, Roche, MSD, Takeda. DM: advisory board/lecture fees from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and Takeda (no personal honoraria) NF: advisory board/lecture fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Roche, MSD, Takeda. JK: advisory board member without receiving any personal fees for Roche Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, MSD, Amgen, Lilly and Takeda. MR: advisory board/lecture fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung. FG: grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, as well as personal fees from AbbVie, Tesaro/GSK, Blueprint Medicines, Amgen. CG: advisory board/lecture fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Takeda, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, AbbVie, Tesaro/GSK and Blueprints Medicines. AS: advisory board honoraria from BMS, AstraZeneca, ThermoFisher, Novartis, speaker's honoraria from BMS, Illumina, AstraZeneca, Novartis, ThermoFisher, MSD, Roche, and research funding from Chugai and BMS. MT: advisory board honoraria from Novartis, Eli Lilly, BMS, MSD, Roche, Celgene, Takeda, AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, speaker's honoraria from Eli Lilly, MSD, Takeda, Pfizer, research funding from AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, and travel grants from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Boehringer. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab maintenance treatment represents the new standard of care in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this prospective hypothesis-generating single-center study, we aim to identify a framework of prognostic and predictive biomarkers by longitudinal characterization of tumor- and patient (host)-related parameters over all phases of multimodal treatment., Methods: This study will enroll 40 patients (≥18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-2, with a diagnosis of PD-L1 positive (≥1%), inoperable stage III NSCLC) with an indication for CRT followed by maintenance treatment with durvalumab according to European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval. Comprehensive analysis will include peripheral blood cellular and humoral immunophenotyping and circulating tumor DNA as well as gut/saliva microbiota analyses. Additional morphological analysis with 18 F-FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) before, 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months after the end of CRT is included. Statistical analysis using multiple testing will be used to examine the impact of different parameters on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as well as tumor response and response duration., Discussion: This protocol describes the methodology of a comprehensive biomarker study in order to identify a framework of prognostic and predictive markers for unresectable stage III NSCLC in a real-world setting., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT05027165), data registered on August 2021., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-21-1010/coif). AJ receives honoraria, worked in consulting or advisory role and received expenses for travel and accomodations by Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck KGaA, Novartis, Qiagen, Roche Pharma and Takeda. AT serves in the advisory boards: Lilly, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, GSK, Celgene, Roche, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Amgen, AstraZeneca. Projects financed by AstraZeneca und Takeda. AT receives travel support from Pfizer and Amgen. CB receives grants or contracts from any entity but not related to this manuscript from Viewray, Brainlab and ELEKTA. CB receives honoraria from BMS, ROCHE, MERCK, Astrazeneca and Viewray. CB receives support for attending meetings and/or travel from BMS, ROCHE, MERCK, Astrazeneca and Viewray. CB receives BMS, ROCHE, MERCK, Astrazeneca and Viewray. CB serves in a fiduciary role in the ESTRO. CE receives grants or contracts from any entity but not related to this manuscript from German Cancer Aid. CE receives consulting fees from Novartis. CE receives support for attending meetings and/or travel from Novartis. CS has received lecture honoraria from Falk and Janssen. EN receives honoraria from Astrazeneca, Hexal, Ipsen and Roche. EN serves in consulting or advisory board of Definiens and Visiopharm. EN receives research funding from Phio Pharmaceuticals (Inst). EN receives royalties or licenses from Medigne (Inst). FK is co-founder of the company ‘Aignostics GmbH’ and receives honoraria from BMS, Merck, Agilent, Novartis, Roche, Lilly, MSD. FM receives an unrestricted Research Institutional Grant from AstraZeneca. FM receives honoraria from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, Lilly, Elekta and Brainlab. FM serves in the advisory board of AstraZeneca, Novartis. LK receives honoraria from AMGEN. NR reports receiving honoraria for speaker activities and participation in advisory boards for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2022 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To understand European non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients' perceptions of disease burden, treatment, and future expectations of treatment and care., Materials and Methods: A 32-item online survey was conducted on a sample of NSCLC patients across Europe. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. Results were presented by disease stage (I-III vs. IV)., Results: NSCLC patients (N = 292) from 10 countries responded. Most patients resided in France, Spain, Italy, Germany and UK, with 16 patients from five other countries. Patients' knowledge of biomarker testing was limited (23% of 376 responses indicated no knowledge). Patients reported fear (stage I-III: 40%, stage IV: 27%), anxiety (stage I-III: 44%, stage IV: 33%) and depression (stage I-III: 24%, stage IV: 20%), but also hope (stage I-III: 57%, stage IV: 59%). Professional status was majorly impacted for 43% of stage I-III patients and 58% stage IV patients. Household finances were impacted for ∼70% of all patients. Oral treatment was preferred (60%), and respondents understood dosing schedules (stage I-III: 82%, stage IV: 97%) remembering to take medications (stage I-III: 82%, stage IV: 87%). Most respondents were willing to take more pills, but some indicated that this would be difficult., Conclusion: Approximately half of the patients in this survey were aware of clinical trial options, but most lacked information about their molecular tumor profile, making it difficult for patients to engage in discussions about their care. The results also suggest that NSCLC patients have significant information and support needs, especially in the areas of emotional and financial burden. Action is needed to address these burdens associated with NSCLC. Furthermore, patients should be provided with the information needed to actively participate in treatment decisions., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Most SCLC patients are diagnosed with extensive disease (ED) and the prognosis in this cohort remains poor. However, some patients are diagnosed with limited (LD) or very limited (VLD, T1-2, N0-1, M0) disease and previous data suggest that surgical resection might improve outcomes in these patients. Most of the existing evidence comes from small case series. For this reason, we investigated clinical features and surgical outcomes in a large cohort of resected SCLC patients., Patients and Methods: We used a large pseudomized dataset (n = 32432) provided by the Munich Cancer Registry to analyze all documented SCLC patients (n = 5043) between 2002 and 2015. We correlated patients' characteristics as well as surgery modalities with survival data and describe trends in the role of surgery in SCLC over the time., Results: We analyzed 5043 SCLC patients. A total of 161 (3.2%) received either oncological (lobectomy, bilobectomy and pneumonectomy) or limited resection (segmentectomy and wedge resection). We found a significant trend suggesting that resections in SCLC patients become less common in all stages of disease, accompanied by an increased proportion of oncological resections. This suggests a more accurate preoperative staging. In VLD resection was significantly associated with longer survival compared to nonsurgical management (log-rank P = .013). Survival was better with oncological resection compared to atypical resection. Administration of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better outcome in all resected patients (P = .01)., Conclusion: VLD SCLC patients benefit from oncological resection. We recommend invasive staging in these patients to ensure VLD. Furthermore, adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered to all resected patients., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) may result not only in acute symptoms such as severe pneumonia, but also in persisting symptoms after months. Here we present a 1 year follow-up of a patient with a secondary tension pneumothorax due to COVID-19 pneumonia., Case Presentation: In May 2020, a 47-year-old male was admitted to the emergency department with fever, dry cough, and sore throat as well as acute chest pain and shortness of breath. Sputum testing (polymerase chain reaction, PCR) and computed tomography (CT) confirmed infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Eleven days after discharge, the patient returned to the emergency department with pronounced dyspnoea after coughing. CT showed a right-sided tension pneumothorax, which was relieved by a chest drain (Buelau) via mini open thoracotomy. For a period of 3 months following resolution of the pneumothorax the patient complained of fatigue with mild joint pain and dyspnoea. After 1 year, the patient did not suffer from any persisting symptoms. The pulmonary function and blood parameters were normal, with the exception of slightly increased levels of D-Dimer. The CT scan revealed only discrete ground glass opacities (GGO) and subpleural linear opacities., Conclusion: Tension pneumothorax is a rare, severe complication of a SARS-CoV-2 infection but may resolve after treatment without negative long-term sequelae., Level of Evidence: V., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: The present study evaluates outcome after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with concurrent and/or sequential Programmed Cell Death 1 (PD-1) or Ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibition (CPI) for inoperable stage III NSCLC patients depending on planning target volume (PTV)., Method and Patients: Prospective data of thirty-three consecutive patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC treated with CRT and sequential durvalumab (67%, 22 patients) or concurrent and sequential nivolumab (33%, 11 patients) were analyzed. Different PTV cut offs and PTV as a continuous variable were evaluated for their association with progression-free (PFS), local-regional progression-free (LRPFS), extracranial distant metastasis-free (eMFS) and brain-metastasis free-survival (BMFS)., Results: All patients were treated with conventionally fractionated thoracic radiotherapy (TRT); 93% to a total dose of at least 60 Gy, 97% of patients received two cycles of concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 19.9 (range: 6.0-42.4) months; median overall survival (OS), LRFS, BMFS and eMFS were not reached. Median PFS was 22.8 (95% CI: 10.7-34.8) months. Patients with PTV ≥ 900ccm had a significantly shorter PFS (6.9 vs 22.8 months, p = 0.020) and eMFS (8.1 months vs. not reached, p = 0.003). Furthermore, patients with PTV ≥ 900ccm and stage IIIC disease (UICC-TNM Classification 8th Edition) achieved a very poor outcome with a median PFS and eMFS of 3.6 vs 22.8 months (p < 0.001) and 3.6 months vs. not reached (p = 0.001), respectively. PTV as a continuous variable also had a significant impact on eMFS (p = 0.048). However, no significant association of different PTV cut-offs or PTV as a continuous variable with LRPFS and BMFS could be shown. The multivariate analysis that was performed for PTV ≥ 900ccm and age (≥ 65 years), gender (male), histology (non-ACC) as well as T- and N-stage (T4, N3) as covariates also revealed PTV ≥ 900ccm as the only factor that had a significant correlation with PFS (HR: 5.383 (95% CI:1.263-22.942, p = 0.023))., Conclusion: In this prospective analysis of inoperable stage III NSCLC patients treated with definitive CRT combined with concurrent and/or sequential CPI, significantly shorter PFS and eMFS were observed in patients with initial PTV ≥ 900ccm., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose of Review: The current review presents clinically relevant driver alterations in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the targeted treatments currently available for clinical use as well as those in clinical trials and advanced stages of drug development., Recent Findings: Mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, proto-oncogene B-RAF (BRAF), proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS (ROS1), rearranged during transfection (RET) and neurotrophic tyrosine kinase are rare genetic driver alterations, each present in a small subset of patients with NSCLC. Treatments targeting BRAF, ROS1, RET and neurotrophic tyrosine kinase are approved in Europe, and promising treatments targeting mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 are available in clinical trials and compassionate use programs. The response rates, duration of response and tolerability observed in trials of targeted drugs in this setting are presented in detail here., Summary: While rare driver alterations are, by definition, rare, their recognition can change the course of NSCLC for those patients affected. Targeted treatments for many rare driver alterations are well tolerated and effective. Screening for molecular changes in advanced NSCLC should include screening for rare drivers, and patients should be directed to clinical trials in setting where treatment of the driver alterations is not otherwise available., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy (RTCT) has become a new standard of care for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. However, little is known about the prognostic role of immune response markers in this setting. We analysed PD-L1 expression and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TiLs) in tumour biopsies from the multicenter German Intergroup Lung Trial (GILT), which previously randomised patients with stage III NSCLC to RTCT with or without consolidation chemotherapy., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed tumour biopsies from patients treated in the GILT trial. PD-L1 expression was analysed using the Ventana SP263 assay and TiL score (low, intermediate, high) and pattern (excluded, inflamed, desert) were assessed. The primary endpoint of the biomarker analysis was PFS in patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1% vs. PD-L1 < 1% NSCLC. Secondary endpoints explored the prognostic relevance of additional PD-L1 expression levels and TiL score and pattern., Results: Biopsies were available from 92 patients treated with RTCT. Patients with available tumor tissue did not differ significantly from the whole study population. PD-L1 scores from 78 samples were available for analysis. There was no difference in PFS in the PD-L1 < 1% vs. PD-L1 ≥ 1% subgroups. TiL score was available in 66 patients. Patients with high TiL score showed favourable overall survival compared to the low TiL subgroup. This trend was most pronounced in those patients treated with consolidative chemotherapy., Conclusion: In this analysis, PD-L1 expression did not correlate with PFS following RTCT. However, patients with TiLs > 10% were found to have longer overall survival, especially for those patients treated with consolidation chemotherapy after the end of RTCT. Further analyses to explore the prognostic and predictive relevance of TiLs in the context of consolidative checkpoint inhibition with durvalumab are required., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the clinical use and real-world efficacy of durvalumab maintenance treatment after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in unresectable stage, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). All consecutive patients with unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 expression (≥1%) treated after October 2018 were included. Regular follow up, including physical examination, PET/CT and/or contrast-enhanced CT-Thorax/Abdomen were performed every three months after CRT. Descriptive treatment pattern analyses, including reasons of discontinuation and salvage treatment, were undertaken. Statistics were calculated from the last day of thoracic irradiation (TRT). Twenty-six patients were included. Median follow up achieved 20.6 months (range: 1.9-30.6). Durvalumab was initiated after a median of 25 (range: 13-103) days after completion of CRT. In median 14 (range: 2-24) cycles of durvalumab were applied within 6.4 (range 1-12.7) months. Six patients (23%) are still in treatment and seven (27%) have completed treatment with 24 cycles. Maintenance treatment was discontinued in 13 (50%) patients: 4 (15%) patients developed grade 3 pneumonitis according to CTCAE v5 after a median of 3.9 (range: 0.5-11.6) months and 7 (range: 2-17) cycles of durvalumab. Four (15%) patients developed grade 2 skin toxicity. One (4%) patient has discontinued treatment due to incompliance. Six and 12- month progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 82% and 62%, median PFS was not reached. No case of hyperprogression was documented. Eight (31%) patients have relapsed during maintenance treatment after a median of 4.8 (range: 2.2-11.3) months and 11 (range: 6-17) durvalumab cycles. Two patients (9%) developed a local-regional recurrence after 14 and 17 cycles of durvalumab. Extracranial distant metastases and brain metastases as first site of failure were detected in 4 (15%) and 2 (8%) patients, respectively. Three (13%) patients presented with symptomatic relapse. Our prospective study confirmed a favourable safety profile of durvalumab maintenance treatment after completion of CRT in unresectable stage, locally advanced NSCLC in a real-world setting. In a median follow-up time of 20.6 months, durvalumab was discontinued in 27% of all patients due to progressive disease. All patients with progressive disease were eligible for second-line treatment., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Objective: Canakinumab is an interleukin (IL)-1β inhibitory antibody. Recently, a large trial of canakinumab in cardiac patients described lower lung cancer incidence in patients treated with canakinumab compared to controls. This finding is the basis for ongoing clinical trials of canakinumab in lung cancer. To address the underlying mechanism, we established lung cancer co-cultures to investigate the interactions between lung cancer cells and immunocyte macrophages as related to the expression of IL-1β and the effect of IL-1β on the NF-κB pathway on lung cancer cells., Methods: Lung cancer cell lines H838 and H1975 and macrophages were mono-cultured separately as control groups. Lung cancer cell lines and macrophages were co-cultured respectively in a ratio of 5:1 under the conditions of 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO 2 for seven days. Cell culture supernatants were collected at predetermined time points, and cell morphology was observed and photographed by microscopy. IL-1β was detected by ELISA. H838 and H1975 cells were treated with PBS or IL-1β for 24 hours. Cells were harvested and lysed, then analyzed in a proteome profiler array., Results: Cells in co-cultures initially grew well. IL-1β was almost undetectable in lung cancer cell lines and macrophage monoculture groups but was highly expressed in co-cultures after 24h and declined at the 7th day. In the H838 and H1975 co-culture group, the lung cancer cells occupied a great majority. IL-1β activates the NF-κB pathway on H838 and H1975 cells., Conclusion: Our data showed that in a lung cancer co-culture incorporating lung cancer cells and macrophages lead to a higher expression of IL-1β than monoculture. It is possible that such dynamic changes in IL-1β expression may also occur in vivo in response to changes in the tumor microenvironment and interactions with immune cell populations. These interactions are likely important components to be considered when studying and modeling the expression of IL-1β as a potential therapeutic target in lung cancer., (© 2021 by the Association of Clinical Scientists, Inc.)

Introduction: The NICOLAS study is the first completed single-arm phase II trial in stage III NSCLC evaluating hierarchically first the safety and then the efficacy of adding nivolumab concurrently to standard definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The safety end point was reported earlier; here, we present the efficacy results., Methods: Stage IIIA-B unresectable treatment-naive patients with NSCLC received three cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy and concurrent radiotherapy (66 Gy, 33 fractions), along with nivolumab (360 mg, 3-weekly). Nivolumab was continued as monotherapy consolidation for a maximum of 1 year (480 mg, 4-weekly). The primary end point was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), with a target improvement compared with historical data of at least 15%, from 45% to 60%. To test this efficacy hypothesis, a sample size of 74 assessable patients provided a power of 83% with a one-sided alpha of 5%., Results: A total of 79 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 21.0 months (interquartile range: 15.8-25.8 mo) for the primary PFS analysis. A total of 35.4% of the patients had stage IIIA, and 63.3% had stage IIIB disease. The 1-year PFS was 53.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42.0%-64.0%) and the median PFS was 12.7 months (95% CI: 10.1-22.8 mo). Because 37 PFS events occurred in the first year posttreatment among the first 74 assessable patients, a 1-year PFS rate of at least 45% could not be rejected (p = 0.23). At an extended follow-up (median 32.6 mo), 37 deaths have been recorded, with a median overall survival (OS) of 38.8 months (95% CI: 26.8 mo-not estimable) and a 2-year OS rate of 63.7% (95% CI: 51.9%-73.4%). The OS of patients with stage IIIA disease was found to be significantly higher than patients with stage IIIB disease, with a 2-year OS of 81% and 56%, respectively (p = 0.037)., Conclusions: PFS and OS are arithmetically higher in studies involving the same population. However, on the basis of the formal hierarchical efficacy analysis, we could not reject that the 1-year PFS rate is at least 45%., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: In light of political discussions about minimum case volumes and certified lung cancer centers, this observational study investigates differences in therapy and survival between high vs. low patient volume hospitals (HPVH vs. LPVH)., Methods: We identified 12,374 lung cancer patients treated in HPVH (>67 patients) and LPVH in 2013 from German health insurance claims. Stratified by metastasis status (no metastases, nodal metastases, systemic metastases), we compared HPVHs and LPVHs regarding likelihood of resection and systemic therapy, type of systemic therapy, and surgical outcomes, using multivariate logistic models. Three-year survival was modeled using Cox regression. We adjusted all regression models for age, gender, comorbidity, and residence area, and included a cluster variable for the hospital., Results: Around 24 % of patients were treated in HPVHs. Irrespective of stratum and subgroup, three-year survival was significantly better in HPVHs. In patients with systemic metastases (OR = 1.84, CI=[1.22,2.76]) and without metastases (OR = 3.28, CI=[2.13, 5.04]), resection was more likely in HPVHs. Among patients with systemic therapy, the odds of receiving pemetrexed was higher in HPVHs, in patients with nodal metastases (OR = 1.57, CI=[1.01,2.45]). In resected patients without metastases the odds ratio of receiving a thoracoscopic lobectomy was 2.28 (CI=[1.04,4.99]) in HPVHs., Conclusion: Our data suggests that case volume is clinically relevant in resected and non-resected lung cancer patients, but optimal minimum case volumes may differ for subgroups., Competing Interests: Declarations of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a heterogeneous disease regarding principal patient- and tumor characteristics. A simple score may aid in personalizing multimodal therapy., Methods: The data of 99 consecutive patients with performance status ECOG 0-1 treated until the end of 2016 with multimodal approach for inoperable NSCLC (UICC 7 th edition stage IIIA/B) were evaluated. Patient- and tumor-related factors were examined for their impact on overall survival. Factors showing a negative association with prognosis were then included in the score. Three subgroups with low, intermediate and high-risk score were defined. The results were then validated in the prospective cohort, which includes 45 patients., Results: Most Patients were treated with concurrent (78%) or sequential (11%) chemoradiotherapy. 53% received induction chemotherapy. Median survival for the entire cohort was 20.8 (range: 15.3-26.3) months. Age (P=0.020), gender (P=0.007), pack years (P=0.015), tumor-associated atelectasis (P=0.004) and histology (P=0.004) had a significant impact on overall survival and were scored with one point each. Twelve, 59 and 28 patients were defined to have a low (0-1 points), intermediate (2-3 points) and high-risk (4-5 points) score. Median survival, 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates were not reached, 100%, 83% and 67% in the low, 22.9 months, 80%, 47% and 24% intermediate and 13.7 months, 57%, 25% and 18% high-risk patients, respectively (P<0.001). Median survival was not reached in prospective cohort; analysis has revealed a trend for the 1-year survival rates with 100% for the low, 93% intermediate and 69% high-risk patients (P=0.100)., Conclusions: The score demonstrated remarkable survival differences in inoperable stage III NSCLC patients with good performance status receiving multimodal therapy., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2019 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this article is to present the current guideline recommendations for the follow-up and surveillance of lung cancer patients and to outline an evidence-based approach to planing individualised follow-up care., Competing Interests: Thomas Duell erhielt Honorare für Vorträge und Beratungstätigkeit von Roche, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, sowie Honorare für Vorträge von BMS und Novartis. Die anderen Autoren geben an, dass keine Interessenkonflikte vorliegen., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Purpose: Mediastinal, hilar, and peripheral pulmonary lymphadenopathy is a hallmark sign of different benign and malignant diseases of the chest. Contrast-enhanced (CE) chest CT is a test frequently applied to examine thoracic lymph node zones. We attempted to find out whether mediastinal, hilar, and peripheral lymph nodes delineate equally in CE chest CT with reduced dose (CE-LDCT, about 1 mSv) when compared with accepted standard CE chest CT (CE-SDCT)., Materials and Methods: In this ethics committee-approved, mono-institutional, retrospective (20 months) matched case-control study, two independent, blinded observers compared measurable lymph node delineation (yes-no) in six different International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) zones (upper mediastinal, aortopulmonary, subcarinal, lower mediastinal, hilar, peripheral) between 62 CE-LDCT cases and 124 CE-SDCT controls (respective tube charge, 100, 120 KVp, computed tomography dose index, 1.66 ± 0.51, 5.36 ± 2.24 mGy, automatic exposure control-modulated 64-row multi-detector chest CT with iterative image reconstruction). Individual matching for gender (53% female), age (53 ± 19 years), body height, weight, anterior-posterior and transverse diameters of chest and lung ruled out pre-test confounders. Lymph node size (cut-off value, 1 cm) was a potential post-test confounder. Two-tailed T test and Chi-square test were significant for p < 0.05., Results: Measurable lymph nodes delineated equally in cases (261/372 IASLC zones, 70%; 280/372, 75%) and controls (528/744, 71%; 519/744, 70%; no significant differences, power 90%). One observer delineated significantly more peripheral zone lymph nodes in cases (35/62) than in controls (43/124); there were no significant differences otherwise. Lymph node size did not differ significantly; effective dose was 1.0 ± 0.3 mSv in cases and 3.4 ± 1.5 mSv in controls., Conclusion: CE-LDCT with about 1 mSv demonstrated equal delineation of thoracic lymph nodes when compared with accepted standard CE-SDCT.

Purpose: To assess rural-urban differences in healthcare utilization and supportive care at the end-of-life in German lung cancer patients., Methods: We identified 12,929 patients with incident lung cancer in 2009 from claims data and categorized them to four district types (major city, urban, rural, remote rural). We compared site of death, unplanned hospitalizations, hospital days, outpatient doctor, general practitioner (GP) and home visits, structured palliative care, therapy with antidepressants, pain relief medication and chemotherapy, and therapeutic puncturing in the last 30 and 14 days of life using mixed models with logistic link function for binary outcomes and log link function for count data. We adjusted all models by age, sex, comorbidities, metastases location and presence of multiple tumors at diagnosis, survival in months, and type of tumor-directed treatment., Results: We found significant differences in two of the outcomes measured. The likelihood of > 14 hospital days in the last 30 days was significantly higher in rural districts than in remote rural districts (1.27 [1.05, 1.52], p = 0.0003). The number of visits to the GP in the last 30 days of life was significantly lower in urban districts than in remote rural districts (β = - 0.19 [- 0.32, - 0.06], p = <0.0001). No other endpoints were associated with regional differences. Triggering factors for high and low utilization of healthcare were mostly age, comorbidities, and prior anticancer treatment., Conclusion: Healthcare utilization and supportive care did not differ significantly between different district types. Results reject the hypothesis of regional inequity in end-of-life care of lung cancer patients in Germany.

Purpose: Positron emission tomography with 2‑deoxy-2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-d-glucose integrated with computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) has an established role in the initial diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. However, a prognostic value of PET/CT during multimodality treatment has not yet been fully clarified. This study evaluated the role of primary tumor metabolic volume (PT-MV) changes on PET/CT before, during, and after chemoradiotherapy (CRT)., Methods: A total of 65 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) UICC stage IIIA/B (TNM 7th Edition) were treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (sequential or concurrent setting). PET/CT was acquired before the start, at the end of the third week, and 6 weeks following CRT., Results: Median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 16 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12-20). In all, 60 (92.3%) patients were eligible for pre-treatment (pre-PT-MV), 28 (43%) for mid-treatment (mid-PT-MV), and 53 (81.5%) for post-treatment (post-PT-MV) volume analysis. Patients with pre-PT-MV >63 cm 3 had worse OS (p < 0.0001). A reduction from mid-PT-MV to post-PT-MV of >15% improved OS (p = 0.001). In addition, patients with post-PT-MV > 25 cm 3 had significantly worse outcome (p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, performance status (p = 0.002, hazard ratio [HR] 0.007; 95% CI 0.00-0.158), pre-PT-MV1 < 63 cm 3 (p = 0.027, HR 3.98; 95% CI 1.17-13.49), post-PT-MV < 25 cm 3 (p = 0.013, HR 11.90; 95% CI 1.70-83.27), and a reduction from mid-PT-MV to post-PT-MV > 15% (p = 0.004, HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.02-0.31) correlated with improved OS., Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that pre- and post-treatment PT-MV, as well as an at least 15% reduction in mid- to post-PT-MV, significantly correlates with OS in patients with inoperable locally advanced NSCLC.

Objective: The TNM 8 lung cancer staging system reclassifies patients with a solitary extrathoracic metastasis as M1b and two or more extrathoracic metastases as M1c. This study investigates the clinical relevance of this change., Methods: Advanced lung cancer patients were retrospectively restaged according to the TNM8 M1b and M1c classifiers. Overall survival was compared in M1b and M1c patients staged with and without PET-CT. We then summarized the TNM 8 staging classification and the relevant literature on the treatment of oligometastatic lung cancer., Results: In all, 82 patients with metastatic lung cancer were reclassified according to the TNM 8: 14 had M1b and 58 had M1c disease. Those with M1b disease lived significantly longer than those with M1c disease (15.2 vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.0029). Among those with M1b disease, survival was the highest when M1b status was confirmed by PET-CT (21.4 vs. 7 months). M1c patients with 4 or less distant metastases had a trend to longer survival vs. M1c patients with 5 or more metastases (9.4 vs. 7.3 months), especially when PET-CT staging was used (13.9 months)., Conclusions: We confirmed the prognostic value of the M1b and M1c descriptors in a Western European tertiary care population. The use of PET-CT seems to increase the prognostic value of the M descriptor and may define an additional oligometastatic subgroup of M1c patients. Clinical trials investigating the treatment of patients with varying degrees of metastatic disease are needed and should be based on PET-CT staging.