251. Differentiating separate primary lung adenocarcinomas from intrapulmonary metastases with emphasis on pathological and molecular considerations: Recommendations from the IASLC Pathology Committee.
- Author
-
Chou TY, Dacic S, Wistuba I, Beasley MB, Berezowska S, Chang YC, Chung JH, Connolly C, Han Y, Hirsch FR, Hwang DM, Janowczyk A, Joubert P, Kerr KM, Lin D, Minami Y, Mino-Kenudson M, Nicholson AG, Papotti M, Rekhtman N, Roden AC, Thunnissen E, von der Thüsen JH, Travis W, Tsao MS, Yatabe Y, Yeh YC, Bubendorf L, Chang WC, Denninghoff V, Fernandes Tavora FR, Hayashi T, Hofman P, Jain D, Kim TJ, Lantuejoul S, Le Quesne J, Lopez-Rios F, Matsubara D, Noguchi M, Radonic T, Saqi A, Schalper K, Shim HS, Sholl L, Weissferdt A, and Cooper WA
- Abstract
Introduction: With the implementation of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, multiple pulmonary tumor nodules (MPTN) are diagnosed with increasing frequency and the selection of surgical treatments versus systemic therapies has become challenging on a daily basis in clinical practice. In the presence of multiple carcinomas, especially adenocarcinomas, pathologically determined to be of pulmonary origin, the distinction between separate primary lung carcinomas (SPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs) is important for staging, management, and prognostication., Methods: We systemically reviewed various means that aid in the differentiation between SPLCs and IPMs explored by histopathologic evaluation and molecular profiling, the latter includes DNA microsatellite analysis, array comparative genomic hybridization, TP53 and oncogenic driver mutation testing and, more recently, with promising effectiveness, next-generation sequencing (NGS) comprising small- or large-scale multi-gene panels., Results: Comprehensive histologic evaluation may suffice to differentiate between SPLCs and IPMs. However, molecular profiling using larger-scale NGS typically provides superior discriminatory power, allowing for more accurate classification. Based on the literature review and expert opinions, we proposed a combined 4-step histologic and molecular classification algorithm for addressing MPTN of adenocarcinoma histology that encourages a multidisciplinary approach. It is also noteworthy that new technologies combining machine learning and digital pathology may develop into valuable diagnostic tools for distinguishing SPLCs from IPMs in the future., Conclusions: Although histopathologic evaluation is often adequate to differentiate SPLCs from IPMs, molecular profiling should be performed when possible, especially in cases with tumors exhibiting similar morphology. This manuscript summarized the previous efforts in resolving the current challenges and highlighted the recent progress in the differentiation methods and algorithms used in categorizing multiple lung adenocarcinomas into SPLCs or IPMs, which are becoming more and more critical in precision lung cancer management., (Copyright © 2024 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF