Search

The aim of this study was to develop and validate an innovative protocol for the diagnosis of Echinococcus granulosus and other Taeniidae in dogs. For this purpose, three experiments were performed, using faecal samples from naturally infected dogs. Firstly, the FLOTAC technique was calibrated with five flotation solutions: saturated sodium chloride (specific gravity, s.g. = 1.20), zinc sulphate (s.g. = 1.35), zinc chloride (s.g. = 1.45), Breza (s.g. = 1.30) and modified Breza (s.g. = 1.40). Then, FLOTAC was compared with four techniques of flotation in centrifuge using: zinc sulphate (s.g. = 1.20), Breza (s.g. = 1.30), modified Breza (s.g. = 1.40), and zinc chloride (s.g. = 1.45). Finally, four different protocols of DNA extraction were compared for Taeniidae identification: QIAamp Tissue Kit and QIAamp Stool from eggs; QIAamp Stool and Wizard Magnetic Purification System for Food from faeces. FLOTAC with zinc sulphate was the most efficient method to detect Taeniidae eggs, showing highest mean of eggs per gram (EPG) of faeces. The QIAamp Stool, using eggs concentrated by FLOTAC, was the best method for DNA extraction. The combination of these protocols provided the highest number of positive samples with PCR, i.e., 47/50 (94.0%). The three negative samples showed a low faecal egg count (2 EPG) below the detection limit (4 EPG) of the protocol. From sequencing of the 47 positive samples: 6 samples were identified as E. granulosus sensu stricto (s.s.), 28 as Taenia hydatigena and 6 as T. pisiformis. A co-infection between different genera of Taeniidae was found in 7 samples.

The objective of this study was to investigate the exposure to Ostertagia ostertagi in dairy cattle herds across Italy through measurement of antibody concentration in the bulk tank milk (BTM) and to evaluate the possible effect of regions, seasons and pasture management practices on the level of exposure to the parasite. The O. ostertagi antibody levels in milk were determined using a commercial ELISA kit (SVANOVIR® O. ostertagi-Ab) and expressed as optical density ratio (ODR). From March 2015 to September 2017, BTM samples were collected in 1209 dairy cattle farms located in 15 regions of Northern, Central and Southern Italy. As reported in previous studies, BTM samples were classified in three different categories according to the level of exposure to O. ostertagi as follows: (i) positive with ODR values >0.60; (ii) negative with ODR values <0.30 and (iii) grey zone with ODR values between 0.30 and 0.60. Finally, differences in ODR values between regions, seasons and herd management practices were studied using the one-way analysis of variance. The overall mean ODR revealed a value of 0.49 in Italy; in particular, dairy cattle farms located in Southern Italy showed the highest O. ostertagi BTM ODR values than the other regions (p < 0.05). The ODR values ranged from 0.45 in autumn to 0.53 in spring and the seasonal difference was significant (p < 0.05). Furthermore, a positive association was found between the ODR values and the access to pasture; herds with access to pasture showed significantly higher titres (p < 0.0001) of O. ostertagi antibodies in milk (mean ODR = 0.63) than in those in total-confinement housing (mean ODR = 0.42). This study, the first of its kind in Italy, will provide a quantitative assessment exposure to O. ostertagi of Italian dairy herds and represents a significant step forward in evidence-based medicine for dairy veterinarians, advisors and farmers., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Loperamide is a piperidine analogue, acting as agonist on peripheral opioid receptors, exhibiting affinity and selectivity for the cloned mu human opioid receptor compared with the delta human opioid receptor. Automatic docking studies of loperamide, using AutoDock, on human mu- and delta-opioid receptors is described. Whilst no meaningful difference was detected concerning the docking of the arylpiperidine moiety, mu/delta selectivity could be explained as a different accommodation of the two phenyl groups in two lipophylic pockets of receptors.